1. Comparison of intraoperative 2D vs. 3D imaging in open reduction and fixation of distal radius fractures
- Author
-
Georg Osterhoff, C.M.L. Werner, Diego Hammerle, Florin Allemann, University of Zurich, and Hammerle, Diego
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Adolescent ,Sports medicine ,Bone Screws ,610 Medicine & health ,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine ,Implant removal ,Intraoperative Period ,03 medical and health sciences ,Fixation (surgical) ,2732 Orthopedics and Sports Medicine ,Imaging, Three-Dimensional ,0302 clinical medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine ,Revision rate ,Intraoperative imaging ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies ,Aged, 80 and over ,030222 orthopedics ,Osteosynthesis ,business.industry ,030208 emergency & critical care medicine ,Mean age ,Middle Aged ,2746 Surgery ,10021 Department of Trauma Surgery ,Open Fracture Reduction ,Surgery, Computer-Assisted ,Emergency Medicine ,Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted ,Female ,Surgery ,Implant ,2711 Emergency Medicine ,2706 Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine ,Radius Fractures ,Tomography, X-Ray Computed ,Nuclear medicine ,business ,Bone Plates - Abstract
In the volar plating of distal radius fractures, intraoperative three-dimensional (3D) imaging is designed to allow better judgment regarding screw and implant positioning compared with conventional intraoperative two-dimensional (2D) imaging. We evaluated the impact of these two imaging modalities on the rates of intraoperative revision and secondary surgery, as well as the need for implant removal during follow-up. A retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who underwent volar plate osteosynthesis for isolated distal radius fractures between January 2008 and April 2016 was performed. Patient files were evaluated for intraoperative imaging findings, intraoperative and postoperative revision rates, and implant removal during follow-up. Additional analyses of radiation exposure, operation time, and hospitalization time were performed. A total of 314 patients were analyzed (mean age: 54 ± 19 years; 210 females). For 246 patients, only 2D imaging was performed, while the remaining 68 patients underwent both 2D and 3D imaging (O-Arm, Medtronic). The intraoperative revision rate was significantly (p
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF