1. Are suicides underreported? The impact of coroners versus medical examiners on suicide reporting.
- Author
-
Fernandez, Jose Manuel and Jayawardhana, Jayani
- Subjects
- *
PROOF & certification of death , *PUBLIC health laws , *SUICIDE , *CORONERS , *VITAL statistics - Abstract
Objective Data Sources and Study Setting Study Design Data Collection/Extraction Methods Principal Findings Conclusion To evaluate if state death investigation systems affect the reporting of suicides, particularly when comparing medical examiners to coroners.We used restricted‐access state mortality data from National Vital Statistics System between the years 1959 to 2016. These data were matched with state‐level changes in death investigation systems reported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention database on the Public Health Law Program: Coroner/ME Laws.We used difference‐in‐differences and event study methods for the analysis. We estimated the relative per capita changes in suicides, accidental deaths, and homicides when comparing coroner‐only states with other death investigation types. Sub‐analyses estimated differences by sex, race, and if coroners were required to receive training.Not Applicable.Coroners‐only states underreported suicides by 17.4% (p < 0.05) and performed 20.4% (p < 0.05) fewer autopsies compared to states with county coroners and a state medical examiner. This pattern is consistent by sex and race. Required coroner training did not affect death determination significantly.Coroners‐only states underreported suicides compared to states with county coroners and a state medical examiner. The disparity in the use of autopsies is a potential mechanism for underreporting of suicides by coroners. If all coroners‐only states adopted a state medical examiner, suicide reporting would increase by 2243–3100 deaths in the United States annually. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF