Search

1 To evaluate oral disopyramide phosphate in the prophylaxis of dysrhythmias occurring in acute myocardial infarction (MI) patients (presenting within 12 h of symptoms, age 21-70 years), a placebo- controlled, randomized double-blind, in hospital trial was conducted. After prognostic stratification (anterior and non-anterior MI at each of 4 regional hospitals) patients were randomly assigned to receive oral disopyramide phosphate (loading dose 150, 200, or 300 mg followed 6 h later by 100, 150, or 200 mg every 6 h for patients assessed to weigh less than 55, 55-85, or greater than 85 kg, respectively or matching placebo. The primary exclusion criteria were overt heart failure, systolic BP less than 100 mmHg, significant heart block or history of urinary retention. Active drug or placebo was continued for 7 days or until (a) detection of 'warning arrhythmias' requiring i.v. lignocaine intervention (greater than 5 for 7 days or until (a) detection of 'warning arrhythmias' requiring i.v. lignocaine intervention (greater than 5 premature ventricular contractions (PVCs)/min, R on T PVCs, multifocal PVCs, bigeminal PVCs, ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation) or (b) onset of exclusion criteria. In addition, plasma drug concentrations were determined and 24 h electrocardiographic tapes were obtained on day 1, and on one of days 4-7 but these results are not presented here. 2 Out of 121 patients entering the trial, 101 had confirmatory ECG and enzyme changes. Of these, 9 of 47 patients receiving disopyramide phosphate required lignocaine compared to 20 of 54 receiving placebo (19% v 37%; P = 0.047). Corresponding numbers for patients discontinuing trial medication for other non-fatal complications of MI were 5 and 3, and for those dying, were 3 (2 infarct extensions and 1 massive infarction), and 0, respectively. Respective numbers discontinuing trial medication for possible drug side effects (viz. urinary retention requiring catheterization) were 6 and 1 (P = 0.031). 3 In circumstances where i.v. therapy is deemed impractical, use of oral disopyramide phosphate given prophylactically in patients with acute MI may reduce the incidence of 'warning arrhythmias' by a clinically significant extent. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists have been shown to reduce mortality in patients after myocardial infarction with congestive heart failure. Whether routine use of spironolactone is beneficial after myocardial infarction is uncertain., Methods: In this multicenter trial with a 2-by-2 factorial design, we randomly assigned patients with myocardial infarction who had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention to receive either spironolactone or placebo and either colchicine or placebo. The results of the spironolactone trial are reported here. The two primary outcomes were a composite of death from cardiovascular causes or new or worsening heart failure, evaluated as the total number of events; and a composite of the first occurrence of myocardial infarction, stroke, new or worsening heart failure, or death from cardiovascular causes. Safety was also assessed., Results: We enrolled 7062 patients at 104 centers in 14 countries; 3537 patients were assigned to receive spironolactone and 3525 to receive placebo. At the time of our analyses, the vital status was unknown for 45 patients (0.6%). For the first primary outcome, there were 183 events (1.7 per 100 patient-years) in the spironolactone group as compared with 220 events (2.1 per 100 patient-years) in the placebo group over a median follow-up period of 3 years (hazard ratio adjusted for competing risk of death from noncardiovascular causes, 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69 to 1.21; P = 0.51). With respect to the second primary outcome, an event occurred in 280 of 3537 patients (7.9%) in the spironolactone group and 294 of 3525 patients (8.3%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio adjusted for competing risk, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.13; P = 0.60). Serious adverse events were reported in 255 patients (7.2%) in the spironolactone group and 241 (6.8%) in the placebo group., Conclusions: Among patients with myocardial infarction, spironolactone did not reduce the incidence of death from cardiovascular causes or new or worsening heart failure or the incidence of a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, stroke, or new or worsening heart failure. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and others; CLEAR ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03048825.)., (Copyright © 2024 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Background: Inflammation is associated with adverse cardiovascular events. Data from recent trials suggest that colchicine reduces the risk of cardiovascular events., Methods: In this multicenter trial with a 2-by-2 factorial design, we randomly assigned patients who had myocardial infarction to receive either colchicine or placebo and either spironolactone or placebo. The results of the colchicine trial are reported here. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, recurrent myocardial infarction, stroke, or unplanned ischemia-driven coronary revascularization, evaluated in a time-to-event analysis. C-reactive protein was measured at 3 months in a subgroup of patients, and safety was also assessed., Results: A total of 7062 patients at 104 centers in 14 countries underwent randomization; at the time of analysis, the vital status was unknown for 45 patients (0.6%), and this information was most likely missing at random. A primary-outcome event occurred in 322 of 3528 patients (9.1%) in the colchicine group and 327 of 3534 patients (9.3%) in the placebo group over a median follow-up period of 3 years (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85 to 1.16; P = 0.93). The incidence of individual components of the primary outcome appeared to be similar in the two groups. The least-squares mean difference in C-reactive protein levels between the colchicine group and the placebo group at 3 months, adjusted according to the baseline values, was -1.28 mg per liter (95% CI, -1.81 to -0.75). Diarrhea occurred in a higher percentage of patients with colchicine than with placebo (10.2% vs. 6.6%; P<0.001), but the incidence of serious infections did not differ between groups., Conclusions: Among patients who had myocardial infarction, treatment with colchicine, when started soon after myocardial infarction and continued for a median of 3 years, did not reduce the incidence of the composite primary outcome (death from cardiovascular causes, recurrent myocardial infarction, stroke, or unplanned ischemia-driven coronary revascularization). (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and others; CLEAR ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03048825.)., (Copyright © 2024 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Background: In the COMPLETE (Complete vs Culprit-Only Revascularization to Treat Multi-Vessel Disease After Early PCI for STEMI) trial, complete revascularization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel disease (MVD) reduced important outcomes compared with culprit-only percutaneous coronary intervention. Whether clinical outcomes in STEMI patients with MVD are influenced by the presence of a left anterior descending (LAD) nonculprit lesion (NCL) remains unknown., Objectives: This study sought to compare: 1) cardiovascular outcomes among patients with an NCL in the proximal/mid-LAD to patients with an NCL in other locations; and 2) the benefit of NCL revascularization in patients with and without a proximal/mid-LAD NCL., Methods: The COMPLETE trial enrolled patients presenting with STEMI and MVD to angiography-guided complete revascularization vs a culprit lesion-only strategy. All coronary angiograms were evaluated in a central core laboratory. In this prespecified subanalysis, treatment effect according to proximal/mid-NCL location was determined for the coprimary outcomes of: 1) cardiovascular death or new myocardial infarction; and 2) cardiovascular death, new myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven revascularization. Cox proportional hazards models were performed with an interaction term for treatment allocation and NCL location., Results: Of the 4,041 subjects in COMPLETE, 1,666 patients had a proximal/mid-LAD NCL (41.2%). The first coprimary outcome occurred in 8.5% (2.9%/y) of patients with a proximal/mid-LAD NCL vs 9.9% (3.4%/y) in those without (adjusted HR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.67-1.03). Complete revascularization had a similar benefit in reducing the first coprimary outcome for patients with a proximal/mid-LAD NCL (7.7% vs 9.2%; HR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.61-1.18) and those without (8.0% vs 11.9%; HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.50-0.86), with no differential treatment effect (interaction P = 0.235) CONCLUSIONS: Among patients presenting with STEMI and multivessel CAD, those with a proximal/mid-LAD NCL had similar event rates to those without. The benefit of complete revascularization between the groups was similar, with no evidence of heterogeneity., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The COMPLETE trial was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and through investigator-initiated research grants from AstraZeneca and Boston Scientific. Dr Pinilla-Echeverri has received research grant support from the Fundacion Alfonso Martin Escudero during the conduct of the study; and has received personal fees from Abbott and Conavi, outside of the submitted work. Dr Wood has received grants and other support from Edwards Lifesciences; and has received grants from Abbott and Boston Scientific, outside of the submitted work. Dr Bainey has received speaker honorarium from BI, HLS, and Novartis. Dr Schampaert has received speaker honorarium from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and Philips. Dr Džavík has received speaker honorarium from Medtronic. Dr Storey has received institutional research grants/support from AstraZeneca and Cytosorbents; and has received personal fees from Alfasigma, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim/Lilly, Chiesi, Cytosorbents, Daiichi-Sankyo, Idorsia, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, and Tabuk; has received personal fees from Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb/Pfizer, Haemonetics, Amgen, Portola, and Medscape; and has received grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Thromboserin, and Glycardial Diagnostics, outside of the submitted work. work. Dr Mehran has received institutional research payments from Abbott, Abiomed, Affluent Medical, Alleviant Medical, Amgen, AM-Pharma, Arena, AstraZeneca, AtriCure Inc, Biosensors, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, CardiaWave, CeloNova, CERC, Chiesi, Cleerly Health Inc, Concept Medical, Cytosorbents, Daiichi-Sankyo, Duke, Element Science, Essential Medical, Faraday, Idorsia Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, MedAlliance, Mediasphere, Medtelligence, Medtronic, MJH Healthcare, Novartis, OrbusNeich, Penumbra, PhaseBio, Philips, Pi-Cardia, PLx Pharma, Population Health Research Institute, Protembis, RecCor Medical Inc, RenalPro, RM Global, Sanofi, Shockwave, Vivasure, and Zoll; has received personal fees from Affluent Medical, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cardiovascular Research Foundation (CRF), Cordis, Daiichi-Sankyo Brasil, E.R. Squibb & Sons, Esperion Science/Innovative Biopharma, EuropaGroup/Boston Scientific, Gaffney Events, Educational Trust, Henry Ford Health Cardiology, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Lilly and Company, MedCon International, Novartis, NovoNordisk, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, TERUMO Europe N.V., Vectura, VoxMedia, WebMD, IQVIA, Radcliffe, and TARSUS Cardiology; serves on the AMA Scientific Advisory Board; is a SCAI Women in Innovations Committee member; has received faculty and CRF honoraria from JAMA Cardiology (Associate Editor) and ACC (BOT Member and SC Member CTR Program); and holds equity <1% in Elixir Medical, Stel, and CntrolRad (spouse). Dr Bossard has received consulting and speaker fees from Abbott Vascular, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi-Sankyo, Novartis, and SIS Medical. Dr Moreno has received personal fees from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Abbott Vascular, Biotronik, Biosensors, Daiichi-Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, Amgen, and Bayer, outside the submitted work. Dr Campo has received research grants from SMT, GADA, Abbott Vascular, and Siemens Healthcare, outside the present work. Dr Cairns has received research grants from Boston Scientific and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Mehta has received grants and other support from AstraZeneca; has received grants from Boston Scientific during the conduct of the study; and has received grants from AstraZeneca, outside of the submitted work. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Evidence on reappraisals of health technologies in Germany is limited, and for rare disease treatments (RDTs), the Federal Joint Committee follows different processes (limited or regular), depending on whether an annual revenue threshold has been exceeded. Our objective is to better understand (re)appraisal processes and their outcomes for RDTs in Germany., Methods: We analyzed appraisal documents of 55 RDT indications for which an initial appraisal and a reappraisal were conducted between 2011 and 2023. We extracted information for the type of evidence, the risk of bias, the availability of additional evidence, and the change in the maturity of survival data as proxies for evidence quality. Specifically, we reviewed the reasons for conducting reappraisals, examined how evidence quality and the clinical benefit rating (CBR) differed between initial appraisals and reappraisals, and explored the association between evidence quality and (1) the CBR and (2) the change in the CBR after reappraisal., Results: Most reappraisals were conducted because the annual revenue threshold was exceeded or the initial appraisal resolution was time limited. Almost all initial appraisals used the limited process, whereas the majority of reappraisals used the regular process. The CBR increased in only 9 and decreased in 21 of 55 reappraisals. There was some evidence that reappraisals with an accepted randomized controlled trial were significantly more likely to achieve a higher CBR., Conclusions: Findings confirmed that reasons and processes for conducting reappraisals of RDTs in Germany differ. Further, high CBRs in reappraisals were not common and evidence quality in initial appraisals and reappraisals was limited., Competing Interests: Author Disclosures Author disclosure forms can be accessed below in the Supplemental Material section., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Complete revascularization is the standard treatment for patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease. The FIRE trial (Functional Assessment in Elderly Myocardial Infarction Patients With Multivessel Disease) confirmed the benefit of complete revascularization in a population of older patients, but the follow-up is limited to 1 year. Therefore, the long-term benefit (>1 year) of this strategy in older patients is debated. To address this, an individual patient data meta-analysis was conducted in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction ≥75 years of age enrolled in randomized clinical trials investigating complete versus culprit-only revascularization strategies., Methods: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane database were systematically searched to identify randomized clinical trials comparing complete versus culprit-only revascularization. Individual patient-level data were collected from the relevant trials. The primary end point was death, myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven revascularization. The secondary end point was cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction., Results: Data from 7 randomized clinical trials encompassing 1733 patients (917 randomized to culprit-only and 816 to complete revascularization) were analyzed. The median age was 79 [interquartile range, 77-83] years. Of the patients, 595 (34%) were female. Follow-up ranged from a minimum of 6 months to a maximum of 6.2 years (median, 2.5 [interquartile range, 1-3.8] years). Complete revascularization reduced the primary end point up to 4 years (hazard ratio, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.63-0.96]) but not at the longest available follow-up (hazard ratio, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.69-1.01]). Complete revascularization significantly reduced the occurrence of cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction at the longest available follow-up (hazard ratio, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.58-0.99]). This was observed even when censoring the follow-up at each year. Long-term rate of death did not differ between complete and culprit-only revascularization arms., Conclusions: In this individual patient data meta-analysis of older patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease, complete revascularization reduced the primary end point of death, myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven revascularization up to 4 years. At the longest follow-up, complete revascularization reduced the composite of cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction but not the primary end point., Registration: URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/; Unique identifier: CRD42022367898., Competing Interests: None.

Background: Patients experiencing myocardial infarction (MI) remain at high risk of future major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). While low-dose colchicine and spironolactone have been shown to decrease post-MI MACE, more data are required to confirm their safety and efficacy in an unselected post-MI population. Therefore, we initiated the CLEAR SYNERGY (OASIS 9) trial to address these uncertainties., Methods: The CLEAR SYNERGY trial is a 2 × 2 factorial randomized controlled trial of low-dose colchicine 0.5 mg daily versus placebo and spironolactone 25 mg daily versus placebo in 7,062 post-MI participants who were within 72 hours of the index percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We blinded participants, healthcare providers, research personnel, and outcome adjudicators to treatment allocation. The primary outcome for colchicine is the first occurrence of the composite of cardiovascular death, recurrent MI, stroke, or unplanned ischemia-driven revascularization. The coprimary outcomes for spironolactone are (1) the composite of the total numbers of cardiovascular death or new or worsening heart failure and (2) the first occurrence of the composite of cardiovascular death, new or worsening heart failure, recurrent MI or stroke. We finished recruitment with 7,062 participants from 104 centers in 14 countries on November 8, 2022, and plan to present the results in the fall of 2024., Conclusions: CLEAR SYNERGY is a large international randomized controlled trial that will inform the effects of low-dose colchicine and spironolactone in largely unselected post-MI patients who undergo PCI. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03048825)., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Frailty is generally a marker of worse prognosis. The impact of frailty on both in-hospital and long-term outcomes in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients has not been well described. Given this context, we aimed to determine the prevalence and impact of frailty on in-hospital and 1-year outcomes in STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI)., Methods: This retrospective study reviewed STEMI patients aged ≥ 65 years who underwent pPCI at 1 of the 2 pPCI-capable hospitals at Vancouver Coastal Health. A frailty index (FI) was determined using a deficit-accumulation model, with those with an FI > 0.25 being defined as frail. The primary outcome was 1-year all-cause mortality. The secondary outcomes included in-hospital all-cause mortality, a composite of adverse in-hospital outcomes (all-cause mortality, cardiogenic shock, heart failure, reinfarction, major bleeding, or stroke), and the individual components of the composite., Results: A total of 1579 patients were reviewed, of which 228 (14.4%) were determined to be frail. After multivariable adjustment, greater frailty (ie, increasing FI) was associated with increased in-hospital all-cause mortality (odds ratio [OR], 1.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.50-2.35, P < 0.001), the composite adverse in-hospital outcome (OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.27-1.68, P < 0.001), and 1-year all-cause mortality (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.10-2.00, P  = 0.011)., Conclusions: In a contemporary STEMI cohort of older patients receiving pPCI, 1 in 7 patients were frail, with greater frailty being independently associated with increased in-hospital and long-term adverse outcomes. These findings highlight the need for the early recognition of frailty and implementation of an interdisciplinary approach toward the management of frail STEMI patients., (© 2024 The Authors.)

Background: ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is associated with high morbidity and mortality worldwide. Simple electrocardiogram (ECG) tools, including ST-segment resolution (STR) have been developed to identify high-risk STEMI patients after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)., Subjects and Methods: We evaluated the prognostic impact of STR in the ECG lead with maximal baseline ST-segment elevation (STE) 30-60 minutes after primary PCI in 7,654 STEMI patients included in the TOTAL trial. Incomplete or no STR was defined as < 70% STR and complete STR as ≥ 70% STR. The primary outcome was the composite of cardiovascular death, recurrent myocardial infarction (MI), cardiogenic shock, or new or worsening New York Heart Association (NYHA) class IV heart failure at 1-year follow-up., Results: Of 7,654 patients, 42.9% had incomplete or no STR and 57.1% had complete STR. The primary outcome occurred in 341 patients (10.4%) in the incomplete or no STR group and in 234 patients (5.4%) in the complete STR group. In Cox regression analysis, adjusted hazard ratio for STR < 70% to predict the primary outcome was 1.56 (95% confidence interval 1.32-1.89; P < .001) (model adjusted for all baseline comorbidities, clinical status during hospitalization, angiographic findings, and procedural techniques)., Conclusion: In a large international study of STEMI patients, STR < 70% 30-60 minutes post primary PCI in the ECG lead with the greatest STE at admission was associated with an increased rate of the composite of cardiovascular death, recurrent MI, cardiogenic shock, or new or worsening NYHA class IV heart failure at 1-year follow-up. Clinicians should pay attention to this simple ECG finding., Competing Interests: Disclosures None reported, (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: In ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), complete revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reduces major cardiovascular events compared with culprit-lesion-only PCI. Whether age influences these results remains unknown., Methods: COMPLETE was a multinational, randomized trial evaluating a strategy of staged complete revascularization, consisting of angiography-guided PCI of all suitable nonculprit lesions, versus a strategy of culprit-lesion-only PCI. In this prespecified subgroup analysis, treatment effect according to age (≥65 years vs <65 years) was determined for the first coprimary outcome of cardiovascular (CV) death or new myocardial infarction (MI) and the second coprimary outcome of CV death, new MI, or ischemia-driven revascularization (IDR). Median follow-up was 35.8 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 27.6-44.3 months)., Results: Of 4,041 patients randomized in COMPLETE, 1,613 were aged ≥ 65 years (39.9%). Higher event rates were observed for both coprimary outcomes in patients aged ≥ 65 years comparted with those aged < 65 years (11.2% vs 7.9%, HR 1.49, 95% CI 1.22-1.83; 14.4% vs 11.8%, HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.07-1.52, respectively). Complete revascularization reduced the first coprimary outcome in patients ≥ 65 years (9.7% vs 12.5%, HR 0.77; 95% CI, 0.58-1.04) and < 65 years (6.7% vs 9.1%, HR 0.72; 95% CI, 0.54-0.96)(interaction P = .74). The second coprimary outcome was reduced in those ≥ 65 years (HR 0.56, 95% CI, 0.43-0.74) and < 65 years (HR 0.48, 95% CI, 0.37-0.61 (interaction P = .37). A sensitivity analysis was performed with consistent results demonstrated using a 75-year threshold (albeit attenuated)., Conclusions: In patients with STEMI and multivessel CAD, complete revascularization compared with culprit-lesion-only PCI reduced major cardiovascular events regardless of patient age and could be considered as a revascularization strategy in older adults., Competing Interests: Disclosures The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: In the COMPLETE trial (Complete Versus Culprit-Only Revascularization to Treat Multivessel Disease After Early PCI for STEMI), a strategy of complete revascularization reduced the risk of major cardiovascular events compared with culprit-lesion-only percutaneous coronary intervention in patients presenting with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease. Patients with diabetes have a worse prognosis following STEMI. We evaluated the consistency of the effects of complete revascularization in patients with and without diabetes., Methods: The COMPLETE trial randomized a strategy of complete revascularization, consisting of angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention of all suitable nonculprit lesions, versus a strategy of culprit-lesion-only percutaneous coronary intervention (guideline-directed medical therapy alone). In prespecified analyses, treatment effects were determined in patients with and without diabetes on the first coprimary outcome of cardiovascular death or new myocardial infarction and the second coprimary outcome of cardiovascular death, new myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven revascularization. Interaction P values were calculated to evaluate whether there was a differential treatment effect in patients with and without diabetes., Results: Of the 4041 patients enrolled in the COMPLETE trial, 787 patients (19.5%) had diabetes. The median HbA1c (glycated hemoglobin) was 7.7% in the diabetes group and 5.7% in the nondiabetes group. Complete revascularization consistently reduced the first coprimary outcome in patients with diabetes (hazard ratio, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.59-1.29]) and without diabetes (hazard ratio, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.55-0.90]), with no evidence of a differential treatment effect (interaction P =0.36). Similarly, for the second coprimary outcome, no differential treatment effect (interaction P =0.27) of complete revascularization was found in patients with diabetes (hazard ratio, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.43-0.87]) and without diabetes (hazard ratio, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.39-0.60])., Conclusions: Among patients presenting with STEMI and multivessel disease, the benefit of complete revascularization over a culprit-lesion-only percutaneous coronary intervention strategy was consistent regardless of the presence or absence of diabetes., Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr Mehta reports grants from Canadian Institute of Health Research, grants from AstraZeneca and Boston Scientific, during the conduct of the study. Dr Mehran reports grants and other from Abbott, grants and other from Abiomed, grants and other from Applied Therapeutics, grants and other from Arena, grants from AstraZeneca, grants and other from Bayer, grants and other from Biosensors, grants, personal fees and other from Boston Scientific, grants and other from CardiaWave, grants from CellAegis, grants from CERC, grants and other from Chiesi, grants and other from Concept Medical, grants and other from CSL Behring, grants and other from DSI, grants from Insel Gruppe AG, grants and other from Medtronic, other from Novartis, grants from OrbusNeich, grants and other from Philips, grants from Transverse Medical, grants from Zoll, personal fees from California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM), personal fees from Cine-Med Research, personal fees from Janssen, personal fees from WebMD, personal fees from SCAI, other from AM Pharma, other from Alleviant Medical, other from CeloNova BioSciences, other from Duke University, other from Humacyte, from Idorsia Pharmaceuticals, personal fees from AMA, other from Biotronik, other from Elixir Medical, other from STEL, other from ControlRad, other from CRF, other from ACC, outside the submitted work. Dr Storey reports personal fees from Bayer, personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer, grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, grants and personal fees from Thromboserin, grants and personal fees from Glycardial Diagnostics, personal fees from Portola, personal fees from Medscape, grants and personal fees from Cytosorbents, personal fees from Intas Pharmaceuticals, personal fees from Hengrui, personal fees from Sanofi Aventis, personal fees from Idorsia, personal fees from PhaseBio, personal fees from Alnylam, personal fees from CSL-Behring, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Chiesi, outside the submitted work. Dr Pinilla-Echeverri reports grants from Boston Scientific, grants from AstraZeneca, grants from Canadian Institutes of Health Research, grants from Population Health Research Institute, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Abbott, personal fees from Philips, personal fees from Conavi, personal fees from Novartis, outside the submitted work. Dr Moreno reports other from Abbott Vascular, other from Boston Scientific, other from Biosensors, other from Biotronik, other from Medtronic Inc., other from Daiichi-Sankyo, other from AMGEN, other from AstraZeneca, other from Edwards Lifesciences, other from Terumo, other from Philips, other from Cardinal Health, outside the submitted work. Dr Steg reports grants and personal fees from Amarin, personal fees from Amgen, personal fees and nonfinancial support from AstraZeneca, grants and personal fees from Bayer, personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Idorsia, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Novo Nordisk, personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from Sanofi/Lexicon, grants and personal fees from Servier, personal fees from Myokardia, grants and personal fees from Sanofi, personal fees from Regeneron, personal fees from Phase Bio, outside the submitted work. Dr Cairns reports grants from Boston Scientific, grants from Astra Zeneca, grants from CIHR, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Abbott, personal fees from Bayer, personal fees from BMS Pfizer, outside the submitted work. Dr Sibbald reports grants from Abbott Vascular and Phillips. The remainder of authors have nothing to disclose.

Background: The prognostic significance of Q waves and T-wave inversions (TWI) combined and separately in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI has not been well established in previous studies., Methods: We included 7,831 patients from the TOTAL trial and divided the patients into categories based on Q waves and TWIs in the presenting ECG. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, recurrent myocardial infarction (MI), cardiogenic shock or new or worsening NYHA class IV heart failure within one year. The study evaluated the effect of Q waves and TWI on the risk of primary outcome and all-cause death, and whether patient benefit of aspiration thrombectomy differed between the ECG categories., Results: Patients with Q+TWI+ (Q wave and TWI) pattern had higher risk of primary outcome compared to patients with Q-TWI- pattern [33 (10.5%) vs. 221 (4.2%); adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 2.10; 95% CI, 1.45-3.04; p<0.001] within 40-days' period. When analyzed separately, patients with Q waves had a higher risk for the primary outcome compared to patients with no Q waves in the first 40 days [aHR 1.80; 95% CI, 1.48-2.19; p<0.001] but there was no additive risk after 40 days. Patients with TWI had a higher risk for primary outcome only after 40 days when compared to patients with no TWI [aHR 1.63; 95% CI, 1.04-2.55; p=0.033]. There was a trend towards a benefit of thrombectomy in patients with the Q+TWI+ pattern., Conclusions: Q waves and TWI combined (Q+TWI+ pattern) in the presenting ECG is associated with unfavourable outcome within 40-days. Q waves tend to affect short-term outcome, while TWI has more effect on long-term outcome., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The optimal strategy to prevent no-reflow in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is unknown., Aims: We aimed to examine the effect of thrombectomy on the outcome of no-reflow in key subgroups and the adverse clinical outcomes associated with no-reflow., Methods: We performed a post hoc analysis of the TOTAL Trial, a randomised trial of 10,732 patients comparing thrombectomy versus PCI alone. This analysis utilised the angiographic data of 1,800 randomly selected patients., Results: No-reflow was diagnosed in 196 of 1,800 eligible patients (10.9%). No-reflow occurred in 95/891 (10.7%) patients randomised to thrombectomy compared with 101/909 (11.1%) in the PCI-alone arm (odds ratio [OR] 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.71-1.28; p-value=0.76). In the subgroup of patients who underwent direct stenting, those randomised to thrombectomy compared with PCI alone experienced less no-reflow (19/371 [5.1%] vs 21/216 [9.7%], OR 0.50, 95% CI: 0.26-0.96). In patients who did not undergo direct stenting, there was no difference between the groups (64/504 [12.7%] vs 75/686 [10.9%)], OR 1.18, 95% CI: 0.82-1.69; interaction p-value=0.02). No-reflow patients had a significantly increased risk of experiencing the primary composite outcome (cardiovascular death, recurrent myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock, or NYHA Class IV heart failure) at 1 year (adjusted hazard ratio 1.70, 95% CI: 1.13-2.56; p-value=0.01)., Conclusions: In patients with STEMI treated by PCI, thrombectomy did not reduce no-reflow in all patients but may be synergistic with direct stenting. No-reflow is associated with increased adverse clinical outcomes.

Background: Mortality remains high in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS), and early reperfusion has been shown to improve outcomes. We analyzed the association between first medical contact (FMC)-to-percutaneous coronary angiography time with mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events among patients with STEMI with and without CS., Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of the Vancouver Coastal Health Authority STEMI registry, including all patients with STEMI who received primary percutaneous coronary angiography between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2020, and stratified them by presence or absence of CS at hospital arrival. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, the secondary outcome was in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events, defined as a composite of the first occurrence of mortality, cardiac arrest, heart failure, intracerebral hemorrhage, cerebrovascular accident, or reinfarction. Mixed effects logistic regression with restricted cubic splines was used to estimate the relationships between FMC-to-device time and the outcomes in the CS and non-CS groups., Results: 2929 patients were included, 9.4% (n=275) had CS. Median FMC-to-device time was 113.5 (interquartile range, 93.0-145.0) and 103.0 (interquartile range, 85.0-130.0) minutes for patients with CS and without CS, respectively. More patients with CS had FMC-to-device times above guideline recommendations (76.6% versus 54.1%, P <0.001). Between 60 and 90 minutes, for each 10-minute increase in FMC-to-device time, absolute mortality for patients with CS increased by 4% to 7%, whereas for patients without CS, it increased by <0.5%., Conclusions: Among patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary angiography, reperfusion delays among patients with CS are associated with significantly worse outcomes. Strategies to reduce FMC-to-device times for patients with STEMI presenting with CS are required., Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr Fordyce serves on advisory boards for Bayer, Novo Nordisk, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Sanofi. Dr Cairns has received research grant support from Medtronic, Sanofi Aventis, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boston Scientific, and Edwards Laboratories; has received speaker honoraria from Pfizer/Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), Bayer, Servier; has received consulting fees from St Jude Medical, Bayer, BMS, Servier; Data and Safety Monitoring Boards; ARTESiA ([Apixaban for the Reduction of Thrombo-Embolism in Patients With Device-Detected Sub-Clinical Atrial Fibrillation] apixaban; Canadian Institutes of Health Research [CIHR], BMS), COMPASS ([Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies] rivaroxaban; Bayer); and ATLAS- ICD ([Avoid Transvenous Leads in Appropriate Subjects Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator]; CIHR, Boston Scientific), OCEAN ([The Optimal Anti-Coagulation for Enhanced-Risk Patients Post-Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation] rivaroxaban; CIHR, Bayer, Biotronik). The other authors report no conflicts.

Background: The Vancouver Coastal Health (VCH) ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) program aimed to increase access to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) and reduce first-medical-contact-to-device times (FMC-DTs). We evaluated the long-term program impact on PPCI access and FMC-DT, and overall and reperfusion-specific in-hospital mortality., Methods: We analyzed all VCH STEMI patients between June 2007 and November 2019. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients receiving PPCI over 4 program implementation phases over 12 years. We also evaluated overall changes in median FMC-DT and the proportion of patients achieving guideline-mandated FMC-DT, in addition to overall and reperfusion-specific in-hospital mortality., Results: A total of 3138 of 4305 VCH STEMI patients were treated with PPCI. PPCI rates increased from 40.2% to 78.7% from 2007 to 2019 ( P < 0.001). From phase 1 to 4, median FMC-DT improved from 118 to 93 minutes (percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]-capable hospitals, P < 0.001) and from 174 to 118 minutes (non-PCI-capable hospitals, P < 0.001), with a concomitant increase in those achieving guideline-mandated FMC-DT (35.5% to 66.1%, P < 0.001). Overall in-hospital mortality was 9.0% ( P  = 0.20 across phases), with mortality differing significantly by reperfusion strategy (4.0% fibrinolysis, 5.7% PPCI, 30.6% no reperfusion therapy, P < 0.001). Mortality significantly decreased from phase 1 to phase 4 at non-PCI-capable centres (9.6% to 3.9%, P  = 0.022) but not at PCI-capable centres (8.7% vs 9.9%, P  = 0.27)., Conclusions: A regional STEMI program increased the proportion of patients who received PPCI and improved reperfusion times over 12 years. Although no statistically significant decrease occurred in overall regional mortality incidence, mortality incidence was decreased for patients presenting to non-PCI-capable centres., (© 2022 The Authors.)

Importance: In patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), complete revascularization reduces major cardiovascular events compared with culprit lesion-only percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Whether complete revascularization also improves angina-related health status is unknown., Objective: To determine whether complete revascularization improves angina status in patients with STEMI and multivessel CAD., Design, Setting, and Participants: This secondary analysis of a randomized, multinational, open label trial of patient-reported outcomes took place in 140 primary PCI centers in 31 countries. Patients presenting with STEMI and multivessel CAD were randomized between February 1, 2013, and March 6, 2017. Analysis took place between July 2021 and December 2021., Interventions: Following PCI of the culprit lesion, patients with STEMI and multivessel CAD were randomized to receive either complete revascularization with additional PCI of angiographically significant nonculprit lesions or to no further revascularization., Main Outcomes and Measures: Seattle Angina Questionnaire Angina Frequency (SAQ-AF) score (range, 0 [daily angina] to 100 [no angina]) and the proportion of angina-free individuals by study end., Results: Of 4041 patients, 2016 were randomized to complete revascularization and 2025 to culprit lesion-only PCI. The mean (SD) age of patients was 62 (10.7) years, and 3225 (80%) were male. The mean (SD) SAQ-AF score increased from 87.1 (17.8) points at baseline to 97.1 (9.7) points at a median follow-up of 3 years in the complete revascularization group (score change, 9.9 [95% CI, 9.0-10.8]; P < .001) compared with an increase of 87.2 (18.4) to 96.3 (10.9) points (score change, 8.9 [95% CI, 8.0-9.8]; P < .001) in the culprit lesion-only group (between-group difference, 0.97 points [95% CI, 0.27-1.67]; P = .006). Overall, 1457 patients (87.5%) were free of angina (SAQ-AF score, 100) in the complete revascularization group compared with 1376 patients (84.3%) in the culprit lesion-only group (absolute difference, 3.2% [95% CI, 0.7%-5.7%]; P = .01). This benefit was observed mainly in patients with nonculprit lesion stenosis severity of 80% or more (absolute difference, 4.7%; interaction P = .02)., Conclusions and Relevance: In patients with STEMI and multivessel CAD, complete revascularization resulted in a slightly greater proportion of patients being angina-free compared with a culprit lesion-only strategy. This modest incremental improvement in health status is in addition to the established benefit of complete revascularization in reducing cardiovascular events.

Background: The 3M-TAVR trial (3M-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement) demonstrated the feasibility and safety of next-day hospital discharge after transfemoral TAVR with implementation of a minimalist pathway. However, the economic impact of this approach is unknown. Therefore, we evaluated costs for patients undergoing minimalist TAVR compared with conventional TAVR., Methods: We used propensity matching to compare resource utilization and costs (from a US health care system perspective) for patients in the 3M-TAVR trial with those for transfemoral TAVR patients enrolled in the contemporaneous S3i trial (PARTNER SAPIEN-3 Intermediate Risk). Procedural costs were estimated using measured resource utilization for both groups. For the S3i group, all other costs through 30-day follow-up were assessed by linkage with Medicare claims; for 3M, these costs were assessed using regression models derived from S3i cost and resource utilization data., Results: After 1:1 propensity matching, 351 pairs were included in our study (mean age 82, mean Society of Thoracic Surgery risk score 5.3%). There were no differences in death, stroke, or rehospitalization between the 3M-TAVR and S3i groups through 30-day follow-up. Index hospitalization costs were $10 843/patient lower in the 3M-TAVR cohort, driven by reductions in procedure duration, anesthesia costs, and length of stay. Between discharge and 30 days, costs were similar for the 2 groups such that cumulative 30-day costs were $11 305/patient lower in the 3M-TAVR cohort compared with the S3i cohort ($49 425 versus $60 729, 95% CI for difference $9378 to $13 138; P <0.001)., Conclusions: Compared with conventional transfemoral TAVR, use of a minimalist pathway in intermediate-risk patients was associated with similar clinical outcomes and substantial in-hospital cost savings, which were sustained through 30 days., Registration: URL: https://www., Clinicaltrials: gov; Unique identifier: NCT02287662.

Study Objectives: Timely coronary reperfusion is critical for favorable outcomes after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). A substantial proportion of the total ischemic time is patient related, occurring before first medical contact (FMC). We aimed to expand the limited current understanding of the associations between prehospital intervals and clinical outcomes., Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of consecutive STEMI patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) (January 2009-March 2016) and assessed the associations between prehospital intervals and the incidence of new heart failure, cardiogenic shock, and hospital length of stay (LOS), adjusting for important clinical variables., Results: A total of 773 patients (77% men, median age 65 years) met eligibility criteria. The median pre-911 activation interval was 29 minutes (interquartile range: 11, 89); the median 911 call to FMC interval was 12 minutes (interquartile range: 9, 15). In multivariable analysis, there was a V-shaped relationship between the pre-911 activation interval and outcomes: a lower likelihood of new heart failure (odds ratio [OR] 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.30, 0.87), cardiogenic shock (OR 0.40; 95% CI: 0.21, 0.75) and prolonged LOS (OR 0.24; 95% CI: 0.14, 0.42) for midrange intervals (11-88 minutes) when compared to the early (< 11-minute) interval. There was no statistically significant relationship between total pre-FMC time and FMC to device activation time., Conclusions: Among ambulance-transported STEMI patients receiving pPCI, the shortest and longest pre-911 activation time intervals were associated with poorer outcomes. However, variation in post-FMC interval alone was not associated with outcomes, suggesting that interventions to reduce pre-FMC intervals must be prioritized., Competing Interests: Dr. Fordyce declares receiving consultant honoraria from Bayer, Novo Nordisk, Boehringer Ingelheim, Sanofi, Pfizer, Amgen, Novartis, and Pendopharm and receiving research grant support from Bayer, the Canadian Cardiovascular Society, and BMS‐Pfizer. Dr. Cairns reports research grants from Boston Scientific, Astra Zeneca, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, and Canadian Institutes of Health Research, as well as personal fees from Abbott, Bayer, and BMS Pfizer., (© 2022 The Authors. JACEP Open published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Emergency Physicians.)

Purpose: Breast cancers detected at screening need less aggressive treatment compared to breast cancers detected due to symptoms. The evidence on the quality of life associated with screen-detected versus symptomatic breast cancer is sparse. This study aimed to compare quality of life among Norwegian women with symptomatic, screen-detected and interval breast cancer, and women without breast cancer and investigate quality adjusted life years (QALYs) for women with breast cancer from the third to 14th year since diagnosis., Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study was focused on women aged 50 and older. A self-reported questionnaire including EQ-5D-5L was sent to 11,500 women. Multivariable median regression was used to analyze the association between quality of life score (visual analogue scale 0-100) and detection mode. Health utility values representing women's health status were extracted from EQ-5D-5L. QALYs were estimated by summing up the health utility values for women stratified by detection mode for each year between the third and the 14th year since breast cancer diagnosis, assuming that all women would survive., Results: Adjusted regression analyses showed that women with screen-detected (n = 1206), interval cancer (n = 1005) and those without breast cancer (n = 1255) reported a higher median quality of life score using women with symptomatic cancer (n = 1021) as reference; 3.7 (95%CI 2.2-5.2), 2.3 (95%CI 0.7-3.8) and 4.8 (95%CI 3.3-6.4), respectively. Women with symptomatic, screen-detected and interval cancer would experience 9.5, 9.6 and 9.5 QALYs, respectively, between the third and the 14th year since diagnosis., Conclusion: Women with screen-detected or interval breast cancer reported better quality of life compared to women with symptomatic cancer. The findings add benefits of organized mammographic screening., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Background: St Jude Medical (now Abbott) Optim-insulated implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) leads were expected to overcome problems with insulation abrasion and externalized conductors in earlier models. Long-term follow-up is essential to the evaluation of lead performance., Objective: To determine, in a prospective cohort of Optim-insulated ICD leads, the rates of all-cause mechanical failure and its subtypes (conductor fracture, insulation abrasion, externalized conductors, and other mechanical failures) and electrical dysfunction adjudicated as nonmechanical failure., Methods: Abbott established 3 prospective registries, enrolling 11,155 leads among 10,872 patients beginning in 2006. There was standardized baseline documentation, 6-monthly follow-up, adverse events reporting, and documentation of lead revision or inactivation, study withdrawal, and death or transplant. The Population Health Institute (McMaster University) reviewed database functions, adjudicated all potential mechanical lead failures, and conducted independent data analyses., Results: During a median follow-up of 4.6 years, there were 171 mechanical failures (1.53%, 95.4% freedom from failure by 12 years). There were no significant differences in survival among Durata DF4 and DF1 and Riata ST Optim leads. The year-to-year rate of failure of leads increased over time. There were 69 electrical dysfunctions (0.62%, 98.8% freedom from failure by 12 years) adjudicated as nonmechanical failure., Conclusion: During follow-up as long as 12 years (median 4.6 years), Optim-insulated leads had low rates of mechanical failure and electrical dysfunction. Independent analyses provide reliable data on the long-term outcomes essential to analyzing ICD lead performance., (© 2021 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: The importance of the grade of ischemia (GI) ECG classification in the risk assessment of patients with STEMI has been shown previously. Grade 3 ischemia (G3I) is defined as ST-elevation with distortion of the terminal portion of the QRS complex in two or more adjacent leads, while Grade 2 ischemia (G2I) is defined as ST-elevation without QRS distortion. Our aim was to evaluate the prognostic impact of the GI classification on the outcome in patients with STEMI., Methods: 7,211 patients from the TOTAL trial were included in our study. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, recurrent myocardial infarction (MI), cardiogenic shock, or New York Heart Association (NYHA) class IV heart failure within one year., Results: The primary outcome occurred in 153 of 1,563 patients (9.8%) in the G3I group vs. 364 of 5,648 patients (6.4%) in the G2I group (adjusted HR 1.27; 95% CI, 1.04 - 1.55; p=0.022). The rate of cardiovascular death (4.8% vs. 2.5%; adjusted HR 1.48; 95% CI 1.09 - 2.00; p=0.013) was also higher in patients with G3I., Conclusions: G3I in the presenting ECG was associated with an increased rate of the composite of cardiovascular death, recurrent MI, cardiogenic shock, or NYHA class IV heart failure within one year compared to patients with G2I. Patients with G3I also had a higher cardiovascular death compared to patients with G2I., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Women with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention historically experience worse in-hospital outcomes compared to men., Hypothesis: Implementation of a regional STEMI system will reduce care gaps in reperfusion times and in-hospital outcomes between women and men., Methods: 1928 patients (413 women, 21.4%) presented with an acute STEMI between June 2007 and March 2016. The population was divided into an early cohort (n = 728 patients, 2007-May 2011), and a late cohort (n = 1200 patients, June 2011-2016). The primary endpoints evaluated were reperfusion times and in-hospital outcomes., Results: Compared to men, women experienced significant delays in first medical contact (FMC) to arrival at the emergency room (26.0 vs. 22.0 min, p < 0.001) and FMC-to-device (109 vs. 101 min p = 0.001). Women had higher incidences of post-PCI heart failure and death compared to men (p < 0.05). Following multivariable adjustment, no mortality difference was observed for women versus men (adjusted OR; 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51-1.34; p = 0.433) or for early versus late cohorts (adjusted OR; 1.04; 95% CI, 0.68-1.60; p = 0.856)., Conclusion: Following STEMI regionalization, women continued to experience significantly longer reperfusion times, although there was no difference in adjusted mortality. These results highlight the ongoing disparity of STEMI care between women and men, and suggest that regionalization alone is insufficient to close sex-based care gaps., (© 2021 The Authors. Clinical Cardiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

[Figure: see text].

Background Guidelines recommend mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) use in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% following a myocardial infarction plus heart failure or diabetes mellitus, based on mortality benefit in the EPHESUS (Eplerenone Post-Acute Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure Efficacy and Survival Study) trial. The objective of this study was to evaluate the real-world utilization of MRAs for patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) with left ventricular dysfunction. Methods and Results The prospective, population-based, Vancouver Coastal Health Authority STEMI database was linked with local outpatient cardiology records from 2007 to 2018. EPHESUS criteria were used to define post-STEMI MRA eligibility (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% plus clinical heart failure or diabetes mellitus, and no dialysis-dependent renal dysfunction). The primary outcome was MRA prescription among eligible patients at discharge and the secondary outcome was MRA prescription within 3 months postdischarge. Of 2691 patients with STEMI, 317 (12%) were MRA eligible, and 70 (22%) eligible patients were prescribed an MRA at discharge. Among eligible patients with no MRA at discharge, 12/126 (9.5%) with documented postdischarge follow-up were prescribed an MRA within 3 months. In multivariable analysis, left ventricular ejection fraction (odds ratio [OR], 1.55 per 5% left ventricular ejection fraction decrease; 95% CI, 1.26-1.90) and calendar year (OR, 1.23 per year, 95% CI, 1.11-1.37) were associated with MRA prescription at discharge. Other prespecified variables were not associated with MRA prescription. Conclusions In this contemporary STEMI cohort, only 1 in 4 MRA-eligible patients were prescribed an MRA within 3 months following hospitalization despite high-quality evidence for use. Novel decision-support tools are required to optimize pharmacotherapy decisions during hospitalization and follow-up to target this gap in post-STEMI care.

Background: We aimed to determine the association of atrial fibrillation (AF) with 1-year outcome in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)., Methods: Patients (n = 8830) enrolled in the T rial o f Routine Aspiration T hrombectomy with PCI vs PCI Al one in Patients With STEMI (TOTAL) were followed for 1 year. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, recurrent myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock, or new or worsening class IV heart failure. The presence or absence of AF was determined from a single pre-PCI electrocardiogram., Results: Patients with AF (n = 437; 4.9%) were older, and more often had a history of stroke, hypertension, or myocardial infarction. The rate of the primary outcome was higher in the AF group than in the sinus rhythm (SR) group (17.4% vs 7.4%, P < 0.001), as was the rate of cardiovascular death (9.8% vs 3.3%, P < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, AF was independently predictive of the primary outcome (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.30-2.16, P < 0.001), cardiovascular death (aHR 1.69; 95% CI, 1.19-2.40, P  = 0.003), all-cause mortality (aHR 1.63; 95% CI, 1.18-2.24, P  = 0.003), and severe heart failure (aHR 1.96; 95% CI, 1.25-3.07, P  = 0.003). Among patients who were in SR, the primary outcome occurred in 307 of 4252 (7.2%) in the thrombectomy group and 310 of 4141 (7.5%) in the PCI alone group, and among those with AF, these rates were respectively 42 of 218 (19.3%) and 34 of 219 (15.5%) ( P interaction  = 0.26)., Conclusions: In STEMI patients, AF on the pre-PCI electrocardiogram is associated with a higher risk of the primary composite cardiovascular outcome, all-cause and cardiovascular death, and severe heart failure during 1-year follow-up than it is in patients with SR., (© 2021 The Authors.)

Background: Major bleeding (MB) is an independent predictor of mortality among ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). Prevention of access-site MB has received significant attention. However, limited data have been obtained on the influence of access-site MB vs non-access-site MB and association with subsequent adverse in-hospital outcomes in the STEMI population undergoing pPCI., Methods: We identified 1494 STEMI patients who underwent pPCI between 2012 and 2018. Unadjusted and adjusted differences among patients with no MB, access-site MB, non-access-site MB, and in-hospital clinical outcomes were assessed. The use of bleeding-avoidance strategies and their effects on MB were also evaluated., Results: MB occurred in 121 (8.1%) patients. Access-site MB occurred in 34 (2.3%) patients, and non-access-site MB occurred in 87 (5.8%). The median reduction in hemoglobin was 31 g/L (interquartile range: 19-43) with access-site MB, and 44 g/L (interquartile range: 29-62) with non-access-site MB. After multivariable adjustment, non-access-site MB was independently associated with in-hospital death (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 4.21; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.04-8.68), cardiogenic shock (aOR 10.91; 95% CI 5.67-20.98), and cardiac arrest (aOR 5.63; 95% CI 2.88-11.01). Conversely, access-site MB was not associated with adverse in-hospital outcomes. Bleeding-avoidance strategies were used frequently; however, after multivariable adjustment, no single bleeding-avoidance strategy was significantly associated with reduced MB., Conclusions: In STEMI patients undergoing pPCI, non-access-site MB was independently associated with adverse in-hospital outcomes, whereas access-site MB was not. Additional study of strategies to reduce the incidence and impact of non-access-site MB appears to be warranted., (© 2021 The Authors.)

The Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) atrial fibrillation (AF) guidelines program was developed to aid clinicians in the management of these complex patients, as well as to provide direction to policy makers and health care systems regarding related issues. The most recent comprehensive CCS AF guidelines update was published in 2010. Since then, periodic updates were published dealing with rapidly changing areas. However, since 2010 a large number of developments had accumulated in a wide range of areas, motivating the committee to complete a thorough guideline review. The 2020 iteration of the CCS AF guidelines represents a comprehensive renewal that integrates, updates, and replaces the past decade of guidelines, recommendations, and practical tips. It is intended to be used by practicing clinicians across all disciplines who care for patients with AF. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) system was used to evaluate recommendation strength and the quality of evidence. Areas of focus include: AF classification and definitions, epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical evaluation, screening and opportunistic AF detection, detection and management of modifiable risk factors, integrated approach to AF management, stroke prevention, arrhythmia management, sex differences, and AF in special populations. Extensive use is made of tables and figures to synthesize important material and present key concepts. This document should be an important aid for knowledge translation and a tool to help improve clinical management of this important and challenging arrhythmia., (Copyright © 2020 Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Useful tools for risk assessment in patients with STEMI are needed. We evaluated the prognostic impact of the evolving myocardial infarction (EMI) and the preinfarction syndrome (PIS) ECG patterns and determined their correlation with angiographic findings and treatment strategy., Methods: This substudy of the randomized Trial of Routine Aspiration Thrombectomy with PCI versus PCI Alone in Patients with STEMI (TOTAL) included 7860 patients with STEMI and either the EMI or the PIS ECG pattern. The primary outcome was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, recurrent MI, cardiogenic shock, or New York Heart Association (NYHA) class IV heart failure within one year., Results: The primary outcome occurred in 271 of 2618 patients (10.4%) in the EMI group vs. 322 of 5242 patients (6.1%) in the PIS group [AdjustedHR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.30 to 1.82; p < .001]. The primary outcome occurred in the thrombectomy and PCI alone groups in 131 of 1306 (10.0%) and 140 of 1312 (10.7%) patients with EMI [HR 0.94; 95% CI, 0.74-1.19] and 162 of 2633 (6.2%) and 160 of 2609 (6.1%) patients with PIS [HR 1.00; 95% CI, 0.81-1.25], respectively (p interaction  = 0.679)., Conclusions: Patients with the EMI ECG pattern proved to have an increased rate of the primary outcome within one year compared to the PIS pattern. Routine manual thrombectomy did not reduce the risk of primary outcome within the different dynamic ECG patterns. The PIS/EMI dynamic ECG classification could help to triage patients in case of simultaneous STEMI patients with immediate need for pPCI., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: In the COMPLETE (Complete vs Culprit-only Revascularization to Treat Multi-vessel Disease After Early PCI for STEMI) trial, angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of nonculprit lesions with the aim of complete revascularization reduced major cardiovascular (CV) events in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI) and multivessel coronary artery disease., Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of nonculprit-lesion stenosis severity measured by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) on the benefit of complete revascularization., Methods: Among 4,041 patients randomized in the COMPLETE trial, nonculprit lesion stenosis severity was measured using QCA in the angiographic core laboratory in 3,851 patients with 5,355 nonculprit lesions. In pre-specified analyses, the treatment effect in patients with QCA stenosis ≥60% versus <60% on the first coprimary outcome of CV death or new MI and the second co-primary outcome of CV death, new MI, or ischemia-driven revascularization was determined., Results: The first coprimary outcome was reduced with complete revascularization in the 2,479 patients with QCA stenosis ≥60% (2.5%/year vs. 4.2%/year; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.47 to 0.79), but not in the 1,372 patients with QCA stenosis <60% (3.0%/year vs. 2.9%/year; HR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.72 to 1.50; interaction p = 0.02). The second coprimary outcome was reduced in patients with QCA stenosis ≥60% (2.9%/year vs. 6.9%/year; HR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.34 to 0.54) to a greater extent than patients with QCA stenosis <60% (3.3%/year vs. 5.2%/year; HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.47 to 0.89; interaction p = 0.04)., Conclusions: Among patients with ST-segment elevation MI and multivessel coronary artery disease, complete revascularization reduced major CV outcomes to a greater extent in patients with stenosis severity of ≥60% compared with <60%, as determined by quantitative coronary angiography., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Importance: Recently, the Complete vs Culprit-Only Revascularization to Treat Multivessel Disease After Early PCI (percutaneous coronary intervention) for STEMI (ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction [MI]) (COMPLETE) trial showed that angiography-guided PCI of the nonculprit lesion with the goal of complete revascularization reduced cardiovascular (CV) death or new MI compared with PCI of the culprit lesion only in STEMI. Whether complete revascularization also reduces CV mortality is uncertain. Moreover, whether the association of complete revascularization with hard clinical outcomes is consistent when fractional flow reserve (FFR)- and angiography-guided strategies are used is unknown., Objective: To determine through a systematic review and meta-analysis (1) whether complete revascularization is associated with decreased CV mortality and (2) whether heterogeneity in the association occurs when FFR- and angiography-guided PCI strategies for nonculprit lesions are performed., Data Sources: A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, ISI Web of Science, and CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) from database inception to September 30, 2019, was performed. Conference proceedings were also reviewed from January 1, 2002, to September 30, 2019., Study Selection: English-language randomized clinical trials comparing complete revascularization vs culprit-lesion-only PCI in patients with STEMI and multivessel disease were included., Data Extraction and Synthesis: The combined odds ratio (OR) was calculated with the random-effects model using the Mantel-Haenszel method (sensitivity with fixed-effects model). Heterogeneity was measured using the I2 statistic. Publication bias was evaluated using the inverted funnel plot approach. Data were analyzed from October 2019 to January 2020., Main Outcomes and Measures: Cardiovascular death and the composite of CV death or new MI., Results: Ten randomized clinical trials involving 7030 unique patients were included. The weighted mean follow-up time was 29.5 months. Complete revascularization was associated with reduced CV death compared with culprit-lesion-only PCI (80 of 3191 [2.5%] vs 106 of 3406 [3.1%]; OR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.48-0.99]; P = .05; fixed-effects model OR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.55-0.99]; P = .04). All-cause mortality occurred in 153 of 3426 patients (4.5%) in the complete revascularization group vs 177 of 3604 (4.9%) in the culprit-lesion-only group (OR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.67-1.05]; P = .13; I2 = 0%). Complete revascularization was associated with a reduced composite of CV death or new MI (192 of 2616 [7.3%] vs 266 of 2586 [10.3%]; OR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.55-0.87]; P = .001; fixed-effects model OR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.57-0.84]; P < .001), with no heterogeneity in this outcome when complete revascularization was performed using an FFR-guided strategy (OR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.43-1.44]) or an angiography-guided strategy (OR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.38-0.97]; P = .52 for interaction)., Conclusions and Relevance: In patients with STEMI and multivessel disease, complete revascularization was associated with a reduction in CV mortality compared with culprit-lesion-only PCI. There was no differential association with treatment between FFR- and angiography-guided strategies on major CV outcomes.

Background: Complete revascularization with routine percutaneous coronary intervention of nonculprit lesions after primary percutaneous coronary intervention improves outcomes in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Whether this benefit is associated with nonculprit lesion vulnerability is unknown., Methods: In a prospective substudy of the COMPLETEs trial (Complete vs Culprit-Only Revascularization to Treat Multi-Vessel Disease After Early PCI for STEMI), we performed optical coherence tomography of at least 2 coronary arteries before nonculprit lesion percutaneous coronary intervention in 93 patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease; and the ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction culprit vessel if there was unstented segment amenable to imaging. Nonculprit lesions were categorized as obstructive (≥70% stenosis by visual angiographic assessment) or nonobstructive, and as thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA) or non-TCFA by optical coherence tomography criteria. TCFA was defined as a lesion with mean fibrous cap thickness <65 μm overlying a lipid arc >90°., Results: On a patient level, at least one obstructive TCFA was observed in 44/93 (47%) of patients. On a lesion level, there were 58 TCFAs among 150 obstructive nonculprit lesions compared with 74 TCFAs among 275 nonculprit lesions (adjusted TCFA prevalence: 35.4% versus 23.2%, P =0.022). Compared with obstructive non-TCFAs, obstructive TCFAs had similar lesion length (23.1 versus 20.8 mm, P =0.16) but higher lipid quadrants (55.2 versus 19.2, P <0.001), greater mean lipid arc (203.8° versus 84.5°, P <0.001), and more macrophages (97.1% versus 54.4%, P <0.001) and cholesterol crystals (85.8% versus 44.3%, P <0.001). For nonobstructive lesions, TCFA lesions had similar lesion length (16.7 versus 14.6 mm, P =0.11), but more lipid quadrants (36.4 versus 13.5, P <0.001), and greater mean lipid arc (191.8° versus 84.2°, P <0.001) compared with non-TCFA., Conclusions: Among patients who underwent optical coherence tomography imaging in the COMPLETE trial, nearly 50% had at least one obstructive nonculprit lesion containing complex vulnerable plaque. Obstructive lesions more commonly harbored vulnerable plaque morphology than nonobstructive lesions. This may help explain the benefit of routine percutaneous coronary intervention of obstructive nonculprit lesions in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01740479s.