Search

We performed a retrospective matched-cohort study to determine the risk factors for mortality among patients with Escherichia coli infections. From January 1996 to December 2003, 100 hospitalised patients with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing E. coli infections were compared with patients not infected with ESBL-producing E. coli. These patients were selected according to the same site of infection and the closest date of admission. Comparison of the two groups showed that empirical antibiotic therapy was more often inadequate in patients infected with ESBL-producing E. coli (44% vs 15%; P<0.01), and that early mortality (16% vs 6%; P=0.02) and overall mortality (25% vs 11%; P=0.01) were also significantly higher in patients with ESBL-producing E. coli infections. A multivariate model identified the urinary tract focus as the only independent risk factor influencing early mortality for E. coli infections [odds ratio (OR): 0.1; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.03-0.7; P=0.01]. All 12 patients with ESBL-producing E. coli urinary tract infections treated initially with an oxyimino-beta-lactam survived. Subsequent analysis of the factors influencing early mortality in the cohort of 130 patients with a non-urinary E. coli infection found inadequate empirical antibiotic therapy as an independent risk factor for mortality only for non-urinary E. coli infections (adjusted OR: 3.0; 95% CI: 1.0-8.6; P=0.03). The study showed that hospitalised patients with ESBL-producing E. coli infections more often receive inadequate empiric antibiotic therapy and have a higher mortality rate than those infected with non-ESBL-producing strains. The site of infection strongly influences mortality. The administration of inadequate empirical antibiotic therapy is independently associated with higher mortality only among patients with non-urinary tract infections. Copyright © 2008 The Hospital Infection Society [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hybrid immunity, resulting from a combination of SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination, offers robust protection against COVID-19 in the general population. However, its impact on immunocompromised patients remains unexplored. We investigated the effect of hybrid immunity against the Omicron variant in a population of kidney transplant recipients receiving the fourth dose mRNA monovalent vaccination. By extracting data from the clinical records and performing individual interviews, participants were categorized into the hybrid cohort (previously infected and vaccinated individuals) and the vaccine cohort (vaccinated-only individuals). The study comprised 1114 participants, 442 in the hybrid and 672 in the vaccine cohorts. From April 2022 to August 2023, 286 infections, 38 hospitalizations and 9 deaths were reported. The cumulative incidence of infection was 12.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.03-16.03) for the hybrid cohort and 36.54% (95% CI, 32.81-40.54) for the vaccine cohort after 300 days of follow-up. Hybrid immunity was associated to a 72% lower risk of infection (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.21-0.38) and a 96% lower risk of hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.01-0.32). No deaths occurred in the hybrid cohort. Hybrid immunity was associated with a lower incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19, underscoring its importance for risk stratification in this vulnerable patient population., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors of this manuscript have conflicts of interest to disclose as described by the American Journal of Transplantation. J.M. Cruzado is the Associate Editor of the American Journal of Transplantation. Other authors of this manuscript have no conflicts of interest to disclose as described by the American Journal of Transplantation., (Copyright © 2024 American Society of Transplantation & American Society of Transplant Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) affects 296 million people globally, causing 780 000 annual deaths. It has been estimated that 12-43 million individuals are co-infected with hepatitis D virus (HDV). In Spain, the prevalence of HBsAg in adults is 0.22%, with an anti-HDV prevalence of 7.7%, although not extensively documented since many HBsAg-positive cases are not tested for anti-HDV. The primary objective of this project is to optimise hepatitis D care by implementing a screening programme for anti-HDV in all HBsAg-positive individuals over a 1 year period in Catalonia. Secondary objectives include evaluating hepatitis D prevalence, establishing a digital registry for all anti-HDV positive cases, testing them for HDV-RNA in a centralised laboratory and offering linkage to care., Methods and Analysis: This prospective study will be performed in seven hospital centres in Catalonia, which attend to more than 95% of the adult population. Approximately, 9290 HBsAg-positive individuals are expected to be screened for anti-HDV in 1 year. All anti-HDV positive samples will be sent to a centralised laboratory for HDV-RNA quantification. All individuals testing positive for anti-HDV will be registered on an electronic platform and linked to care. The registry will collect data on demographics, infection stage, risk factors, disease awareness and previous diagnoses. No additional interventions will be conducted for those with adequate follow-up., Ethics and Dissemination: The Vall d'Hebron Hospital Ethics Committee (PR(AG)628/2023) and the Spanish Agency of Medicines and Medical Devices approved this study. These findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations., Trial Registration Study: Grant number: IN-ES-980-7058., Competing Interests: Competing interests: MB has served as a speaker and advisory board member for Gilead, AbbVie, Roche, Arbutus and GSK. No competing interests were declared for AP, AR-S, GF, LC, AS-S, DPdC, SMB, MMOPM, DT, JA, MAL, JCQ., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

We assessed whether multiplex real-time PCR plus conventional microbiological testing is safe and more effective than conventional microbiological testing alone for reducing antibiotic use in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). In this randomised trial, we recruited adults hospitalised with CAP at four Spanish hospitals. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to undergo either multiplex real-time PCR in non-invasive respiratory samples plus conventional microbiological testing or conventional microbiological testing alone. The primary endpoint was antibiotic use measured by days of antibiotic therapy (DOT). Between February 20, 2020, and April 24, 2023, 242 patients were enrolled; 119 were randomly assigned to multiplex real-time PCR plus conventional microbiological testing and 123 to conventional microbiological testing alone. All but one of the patients allocated to multiplex real-time PCR plus conventional microbiological testing underwent PCR, which was performed in sputum samples in 77 patients (65.2%) and in nasopharyngeal swabs in 41 (34.7%). The median DOT was 10.04 (IQR 7.98, 12.94) in the multiplex PCR plus conventional microbiological testing group and 11.33 (IQR 8.15, 16.16) in the conventional microbiological testing alone group (difference -1.04; 95% CI, -2.42 to 0.17; p = 0.093). No differences were observed in adverse events and 30-day mortality. Our findings do not support the routine implementation of multiplex real-time PCR in the initial microbiological testing in hospitalised patients with CAP. Clinicaltrials.gov registration: NCT04158492., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: The onset and spread of COVID-19 pandemic has forced clinical laboratories to rapidly expand testing capacity for SARS-CoV-2. This study evaluates the clinical performance of the TMA Procleix SARS-CoV-2 assay in comparison to the RT-PCR assay Allplex™ SARS-CoV-2 for the qualitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA., Methods: Between November 2020 and February 2021, 610 upper-respiratory specimens received for routine SARS-CoV-2 molecular testing were prospectively collected and selected at the Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron and the Hospital Universitari Bellvitge in Barcelona, Spain. All samples were processed in parallel with the TMA and the RT-PCR assays, and results were compared. Discrepancies were retested by an additional RT-PCR method and the clinical history of these patients was reviewed., Results: Overall, the level of concordance between both assays was 92.0% (κ, 0.772). Most discordant results (36/38, 94.7%) corresponded to samples testing positive with the TMA assay and negative with the RT-PCR method. Of these discrepant cases, most (28/36, 77.8%) were finally classified as confirmed or probable SARS-CoV-2 cases according to the discrepant analysis., Conclusion: In conclusion, the TMA Procleix SARS-CoV-2 assay performed well for the qualitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in a multisite clinical setting. This novel TMA assay demonstrated a greater sensitivity in comparison to RT-PCR methods for the molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2. This higher sensitivity but also the qualitative feature of this detection of SARS-CoV-2 should be considered when making testing algorithm decisions., (Copyright © 2022 Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The usefulness of routine microbiological testing for rationalising antibiotic use in hospitalised patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) continues to be a subject of debate. We aim to determine the effect of positive microbiological testing on antimicrobial de-escalation and clinical outcomes in CAP., Methods: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected cohort of non-immunosuppressed adults hospitalised with CAP was performed. The primary study outcome was antimicrobial de-escalation. Secondary outcomes included 30-day case-fatality rate, adverse events, and CAP recurrence. Adjustment for confounders was performed by inverse probability weighting propensity score, logistic regression, and cause-specific Cox model., Results: Of 3677 patients with CAP, 1924 (52.3%) had any positive microbiological test. Antimicrobial de-escalation was performed in 648/1924 (33.7%) of patients with positive microbiological testing and in 179/1753 (10.2%) of those with non-positive results. When propensity score was entered into the multivariate analysis, positive microbiological testing (adjusted OR (AOR)], 2.59; 1.96-3.41) and clinical stability at day 3 (AOR 1.87; 1.45-2.10) were two of the main factors independently associated with antimicrobial de-escalation. After applying an adjusted cause-specific Cox model, antimicrobial de-escalation was not associated with a higher 30-day case-fatality rate (adjusted hazard ratio (AHR), 0.44 (95% CI, 0.14-1.43)), higher frequency of adverse events (AHR, 0.77 (95% CI, 0.53-1.12)), or CAP recurrence (AHR, 0.65 (95% CI, 0.35-1.14))., Discussion: Antimicrobial de-escalation was more often performed in hospitalised patients with CAP who had positive microbiological tests than in those with non-positive results, and it did not adversely affect relevant clinical outcomes., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Objective: While the course of natural immunization specific to SARS-CoV-2 has been described among convalescent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) people without HIV (PWOH), a thorough evaluation of long-term serological and functional T- and B-cell immune memory among people with HIV (PWH) has not been reported., Methods: Eleven stable PWH developing mild ( n  = 5) and severe ( n  = 6) COVID-19 and 39 matched PWOH individuals with mild (MILD) ( n  = 20) and severe (SEV) ( n  = 19) COVID-19 infection were assessed and compared at 3 and 6 months after infection for SARS-CoV-2-specific serology, polyfunctional cytokine (interferon-γ [IFN-γ], interleukin 2 [IL-2], IFN-γ/IL-2, IL-21) producing T-cell frequencies against four main immunogenic antigens and for circulating SARS-CoV-2-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG)-producing memory B-cell (mBc)., Results: In all time points, all SARS-COV-2-specific adaptive immune responses were highly driven by the clinical severity of COVID-19 infection, irrespective of HIV disease. Notably, while a higher proportion of mild PWH showed a higher decay on serological detection between the two time points as compared to PWOH, persistently detectable IgG-producing mBc were still detectable in most patients (4/4 (100%) for SEV PWH, 4/5 (80%) for MILD PWH, 10/13 (76.92%) for SEV PWOH and 15/18 (83.33%) for MILD PWOH). Likewise, SARS-CoV-2-specific IFN-γ-producing T-cell frequencies were detected in both PWH and PWOH, although significantly more pronounced among severe COVID-19 (6/6 (100%) for SEV PWH, 3/5 (60%) for MILD PWH, 18/19 (94.74%) for SEV PWOH and 14/19 (73.68%) for MILD PWOH)., Conclusions: PWH develop a comparable short and long-term natural functional cellular and humoral immune response than PWOH convalescent patients, which are highly influenced by the clinical severity of the COVID-19 infection., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Long-term humoral immunity and its protective role in liver transplantation (LT) patients have not been elucidated. We performed a prospective multicenter study to assess the persistence of immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies in LT recipients 12 months after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). A total of 65 LT recipients were matched with 65 nontransplanted patients by a propensity score including variables with recognized impact on COVID-19. LT recipients showed a lower prevalence of anti-nucleocapsid (27.7% versus 49.2%; P = 0.02) and anti-spike IgG antibodies (88.2% versus 100.0%; P = 0.02) at 12 months. Lower index values of anti-nucleocapsid IgG antibodies were also observed in transplantation patients 1 year after COVID-19 (median, 0.49 [interquartile range, 0.15-1.40] versus 1.36 [interquartile range, 0.53-2.91]; P < 0.001). Vaccinated LT recipients showed higher antibody levels compared with unvaccinated patients (P < 0.001); antibody levels reached after vaccination were comparable to those observed in nontransplanted individuals (P = 0.70). In LT patients, a longer interval since transplantation (odds ratio, 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.20) was independently associated with persistence of anti-nucleocapsid IgG antibodies 1 year after infection. In conclusion, compared with nontransplanted patients, LT recipients show a lower long-term persistence of anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibodies. However, SARS-CoV-2 vaccination after COVID-19 in LT patients achieves a significant increase in antibody levels, comparable to that of nontransplanted patients., (© 2021 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

Long-term adaptive immune memory has been reported among immunocompetent individuals up to eight months following SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, limited data is available in convalescent patients with a solid organ transplant. To investigate this, we performed a thorough evaluation of adaptive immune memory at different compartments (serological, memory B cells and cytokine [IFN-γ, IL-2, IFN-γ/IL12 and IL-21] producing T cells) specific to SARS-CoV-2 by ELISA and FluoroSpot-based assays in 102 convalescent patients (53 with a solid organ transplants (38 kidney, 5 liver, 5 lung and 5 heart transplant) and 49 immunocompetent controls) with different clinical COVID-19 severity (severe, mild and asymptomatic) beyond six months after infection. While similar detectable memory responses at different immune compartments were detected between those with a solid organ transplant and immunocompetent individuals, these responses were predominantly driven by distinct COVID-19 clinical severities (97.6%, 80.5% and 42.1%, all significantly different, were seropositive; 84% vs 75% vs 35.7%, all significantly different, showed IgG-producing memory B cells and 82.5%, 86.9% and 31.6%, displayed IFN-γ producing T cells; in severe, mild and asymptomatic convalescent patients, respectively). Notably, patients with a solid organ transplant with longer time after transplantation did more likely show detectable long-lasting immune memory, regardless of COVID-19 severity. Thus, our study shows that patients with a solid organ transplant are capable of maintaining long-lasting peripheral immune memory after COVID-19 infection; mainly determined by the degree of infection severity., (Copyright © 2022 International Society of Nephrology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: SARS-CoV-2 vaccines' effectiveness is not yet clearly known in immunocompromised patients. This study aims to assess the humoral and cellular specific immune response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and the predictors of poor response in patients with common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) phenotype and in patients treated with B-cell depletion therapies (BCDT), as well as the safety of these vaccines., Methods: From March to September 2021, we performed a prospective study of all adult patients who would receive the SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and were previously diagnosed with (i) a CVID syndrome (CVID phenotype group; n=28) or (ii) multiple sclerosis (MS) treated with B-cell depleting therapies three to six months before vaccination (BCD group; n=24). Participants with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection; or prior SARS-CoV-2 vaccine administration; or use of any immunosuppressant (except BCDT in MS group) were excluded. A group of subjects without any medical condition that confers immunosuppression and who met all study criteria was also assessed (control group; n=14). A chemiluminescence immunoassay was used to determine pre- and post-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine anti-S IgG antibodies. T-cell specific response was assessed by analysis of pre- and post-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination blood samples with an interferon-gamma release assay. The baseline blood sample also included several biochemical, haematological and immunological analyses., Results: SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are safe in immunocompromised patients, although their effectiveness was lower than in healthy individuals. CVID phenotype patients showed impaired humoral (29%) and cellular (29%) response, while BCD patients fundamentally presented humoral failure (54%). Low IgA values, low CD19+ peripheral B cells, low switched memory B cells, and a low CD4+/CD8+ ratio were predictors of inadequate specific antibody response in CVID phenotype patients. No factor was found to predict poor cellular response in CVID phenotype patients, nor a defective humoral or cellular response in BCD patients., Conclusion: The effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in CVID phenotype and BCD patients is lower than in healthy individuals. Knowledge of predictive factors of humoral and cellular response failure in immunocompromised patients could be very useful in clinical practice, and thus, studies in this regard are clearly needed., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Antolí, Rocamora-Blanch, Framil, Mas-Bosch, Navarro, Bermudez, Martinez-Yelamos, Dopico, Calatayud, Garcia-Muñoz, Hernández-Benítez, Riera-Mestre, Bas, Masuet-Aumatell, Rigo-Bonnin, Morandeira and Solanich.)

We describe an outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 (B.1.351) in a nursing home. At the outbreak onset 96% of residents and 76% of HCW had received two doses of BNT162b2. Twenty-eight residents (28/53) and six HCW (6/33) were infected. Infected residents had lower levels of anti-S antibodies compared to those who were not infected (157 vs 552 U/mL). Among 50 residents with available serological status, nineteen (19/25) with serum concentration < 300 U/mL and seven (7/25) with concentration > 300 U/mL acquired SARS-CoV-2 (RR 2.7 [95 %CI 1.4-5.3]). The quantification of circulating antibodies could be useful in detecting people with an impaired immune response who are at high risk of acquiring and spreading SARS-CoV-2., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The onset and spread of COVID-19 pandemic has forced clinical laboratories to rapidly expand testing capacity for SARS-CoV-2. This study evaluates the clinical performance of the TMA Procleix SARS-CoV-2 assay in comparison to the RT-PCR assay Allplex TM SARS-CoV-2 for the qualitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA., Methods: Between November 2020 and February 2021, 610 upper-respiratory specimens received for routine SARS-CoV-2 molecular testing were prospectively collected and selected at the Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron and the Hospital Universitari Bellvitge in Barcelona, Spain. All samples were processed in parallel with the TMA and the RT-PCR assays, and results were compared. Discrepancies were retested by an additional RT-PCR method and the clinical history of these patients was reviewed., Results: Overall, the level of concordance between both assays was 92.0% (κ, 0.772). Most discordant results (36/38, 94.7%) corresponded to samples testing positive with the TMA assay and negative with the RT-PCR method. Of these discrepant cases, most (28/36, 77.8%) were finally classified as confirmed or probable SARS-CoV-2 cases according to the discrepant analysis., Conclusion: In conclusion, the TMA Procleix SARS-CoV-2 assay performed well for the qualitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in a multisite clinical setting. This novel TMA assay demonstrated a greater sensitivity in comparison to RT-PCR methods for the molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2. This higher sensitivity but also the qualitative feature of this detection of SARS-CoV-2 should be considered when making testing algorithm decisions., (© 2022 Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence studies are currently being recommended and implemented in many countries. Forming part of the COVID-19 monitoring and evaluation plan of the Catalan Government Health Department, our network aims to initiate a primary healthcare sentinel monitoring system as a surrogate of SARS-CoV-2 exposure in the Barcelona Metropolitan Area., Methods and Analysis: The seroCAP is a serial cross-sectional study, which will be performed in the Barcelona Metropolitan Area to estimate antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. From February 2021 to March 2022, the detection of serum IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 trimeric spike protein will be performed on a monthly basis in blood samples collected for diverse clinical purposes in three reference hospitals from the three Barcelona healthcare areas (BCN areas). The samples (n=2588/month) will be from patients attended by 30 primary healthcare teams at 30 basic healthcare areas (BHA). A lab software algorithm will systematically select the samples by age and sex. Seroprevalence will be estimated and monitored by age, sex, BCN area and BHA. Descriptive and cluster analysis of the characteristics and distribution of SARS-CoV-2 infections will be performed. Sociodemographic, socioeconomic and morbidity-associated factors will be determined using logistic regression. We will explore the association between seroprevalence, SARS-CoV-2 confirmed cases and the implemented measures using interrupted time series analysis., Ethics and Dissemination: Ethical approval was obtained from the University Institute Foundation for Primary Health Care Research Jordi Gol i Gurina ethics committee. An informed consent is not required regarding the approval of the secondary use of biological samples within the framework of the COVID-19 pandemic. A report will be generated quarterly. The final analysis, conclusions and recommendations will be shared with the stakeholders and communicated to the general public. Manuscripts resulting from the network will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)