Search

IntroductionThe combination of tacrolimus/mTORi compared to tacrolimus/mycophenolate (MMF) was shown to be safe in the TRANSFORM trial. For donors with a high KDPI (Kidney Donor Profile Index), however, there are no data to support the effectiveness of this regimen. The main objective of this study was to explore the influence of the KDPI on 12-month renal function (eGFR) in patients receiving mTORi or MMF.MethodsMulticenter cohort study of four Brazilian services that use the tacrolimus with mTORi as a protocol. Data from 2008 to 2018 of the tacrolimus/mycophenolate (MMF) and tacrolimus/mTORi (mTORi) regimens in renal transplant recipients over 18 years old were collected. For better homogeneity, the propensity score was used. Afterward, the method used for group selection (“match”) was the K-nearest neighbor (KNN) method. New analyses were performed on this new balanced sample, and two different subsamples were constituted based on the median KDPI.ResultsThe global analysis (n = 870) showed that the major determinant of worse kidney function was high KDPI. Afterward, the three strata were analyzed. In the first stratum (KDPI up to 50), 242 patients were evaluated, with 121 in each group. The eGFR was 64 ml/min/1.73 m2 in the mTORi group compared to 63 in the MMF group, p = 0.4, and when imputed eGFR was evaluated, 61 in the mTORi and 53 in the MMF, p = 0.065. In the second stratum (KDPI from 50 to 85), 282 patients were evaluated, with 141 in each group. eGFR was 46 ml/min/1.73 m2 in mTORi compared to 48 in MMF, p = 0.4, and when imputed eGFR was evaluated, 40 mTORi and 41 MMF, p = 0.8. In the last stratum (KDPI higher than 85) with n = 126 and 63 cases per group, eGFR was 36 ml/min/1.73 m2 in mTORi compared to 39 in MMF, p = 0.2, and when imputed eGFR was evaluated, 30 mTORi and 34 MMF, p = 0.2.DiscussionThe regimen using mTOR inhibitor is an effective and safe regimen when compared to the standard regimen. In addition, the scheme seems to offer additional protection against infections and may be an important ally in cases of high risk for these pathologies.

Introduction: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most common viral pathogen occurring in postrenal transplantation. CMV infection usually develops during the first few months after transplantation. The success of CMV prophylaxis with antivirals has resulted in a decrease in the incidence of CMV infection. However, CMV remains a significant pathogen, associated with allograft rejection and loss, mortality, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IF/TA) in protocol biopsies, and increased post-transplant costs. Purpose: To determine the incidence of cytomegalovirus disease in kidney transplant recipients receiving Everolimus and reduced Tacrolimus doses. Material and Methods: All low immunological risk patients, >18 years old whom received kidney transplantation at Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Juiz de Fora between January 2013 and February 2017 were retrospectively assessed. The first group received induction therapy with Basiliximab, and the post-operative maintenance regimen included Tacrolimus, Mycophenolic acid and Prednisone (BAS/MPS), and the second group received Polyclonal antilymphocyte globulins (2,25mg/kg) as induction therapy, and then low dose of Tacrolimus (2mg/10kg/day), Everolimus and Prednisone as maintenance regimen (r-ATG/EVR). None of the patients received pharmacological prophylaxis or preemptive therapy against CMV. Results: Patients receiving EVR showed a lower incidence of CMV when compared to those receiving MPS (4.2% x 17.5%, p=0.005). There was an important difference in the time of hospitalization to treat CMV disease. Patients of the MPS stayed hospitalized for about 20 days more than the EVR group (p=0.005). There was no difference as to the incidence of rejection, delayed graft function or graft survival. Conclusion: Results from this trial conducted in low immunological risk kidney transplant recipients receiving no CMV prophylaxis demonstrated that EVR was associated to a decrease in CMV disease incidence when compared to MPS. These data suggest that kidney transplant recipients receiving EVR may not need CMV prophylaxis.