Search

Objectives: To examine the relationship between angular insertion depth (AID), modiolar proximity, and speech recognition outcomes for cochlear implant (CI) recipients of a precurved electrode array., Study Design: Retrospective review., Setting: Tertiary academic referral center., Patients: Thirty-five adult CI recipients (n = 40 ears) of precurved electrode arrays listening with a CI-alone device., Interventions: Cochlear implantation with postoperative computed tomography., Main Outcome Measures: Consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) word recognition at 6 months post-activation., Results: A multivariate regression model demonstrated that both deeper apical AID and closer modiolar proximity in the basal turn were independently associated with better CNC word scores at 6 months (F2,37 = 7.264, p = 0.002). A deeper basal insertion depth was positively correlated with apical AID (r = 0.754, p < 0.001) but negatively correlated with modiolar proximity in the basal turn (r = -0.766, p < 0.001)., Conclusions: These data suggest that both apical cochlear coverage and modiolar proximity independently confer speech recognition benefit with a precurved array. However, these benefits are mutually exclusive for current precurved array designs as a deeper basal insertion depth results in greater apical coverage but lateralization of electrodes away from the modiolus in the basal turn. Future work is needed to elucidate mechanisms behind these findings that may motivate electrode array design modifications to further optimize outcomes for CI users., Competing Interests: Sources of support and disclosure of funding: K.D.B. serves on the surgical advisory board for MED-EL Corporation and Advanced Bionics Corporation, and is a consultant for Cochlear Corporation. M.T.D. is supported by a research grant from MED-EL Corporation provided to the university. M.W.C., N.J.T., A.M.S., and M.M.D. declare that involvement in research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024, Otology & Neurotology, Inc.)

Objectives: To examine the effects of scala tympani (ST) volume, cochlear duct length (CDL), and angular insertion depth (AID) on low-frequency hearing preservation for cochlear implant (CI) recipients of lateral wall electrode arrays., Methods: A retrospective review identified 45 adult CI recipients of 24-, 28-, or 31.5-mm lateral wall electrode arrays with preoperative unaided hearing thresholds ≤45 decibel hearing level (dB HL) at 250 Hz. All patients underwent preoperative and postoperative computed tomography to evaluate cochlear morphology and electrode array position. A linear mixed effects model evaluated effects of ST volume, CDL, AID, preoperative low-frequency pure-tone average (LFPTA; 125, 250, and 500 Hz), age at surgery, and biological sex on the postoperative change in LFPTA at activation and 6 months post-activation., Results: There were significant main effects of ST volume (p = 0.044), age (p = 0.028), and biological sex (p = 0.003), indicating better low-frequency hearing preservation for CI recipients with larger ST volumes, younger age at surgery, and female biological sex. Although CDL positively correlated with ST volume (r = 0.74, p < 0.001), there was no significant main effect of CDL (p = 0.367). A broad range in AID of the most apical electrode contact was observed (301.4°-681.8°); however, there was no significant main effect of AID on low-frequency hearing preservation (p = 0.700)., Conclusions: During the initial 6 months following implantation, intrinsic factors such as cochlear morphology may have a greater impact on low-frequency hearing preservation than apical positioning of a flexible lateral wall electrode array when using soft surgical techniques., Level of Evidence: 3 Laryngoscope, 2024., (© 2024 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.)

Objective: Some cochlear implant (CI) recipients with unilateral hearing loss (UHL) have functional acoustic hearing in the implanted ear, warranting the fitting of an ipsilateral electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) device. The present study assessed speech recognition and subjective hearing abilities over time for EAS users with UHL., Study Design: Prospective, repeated-measures., Setting: Tertiary referral center., Patients: Adult CI recipients with normal-to-moderate low-frequency acoustic thresholds in the implanted ear and a contralateral pure-tone average (0.5, 1, and 2 kHz) ≤25 dB HL., Main Outcome Measures: Participants were evaluated preoperatively and at 1, 3, and 6 months post-activation. Speech recognition for the affected ear was evaluated with CNC words in quiet. Masked speech recognition in the bilateral condition was evaluated with AzBio sentences in a 10-talker masker (0 dB SNR) for three spatial configurations: target from the front and masker either colocated with the target or presented 90 degrees toward the affected or contralateral ear. Responses to the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale subscales were used to assess subjective hearing abilities., Results: Participants experienced significant improvements in CNC scores ( F(3,13) = 14.90, p < 0.001), and masked speech recognition in the colocated ( F(3,11) = 3.79, p = 0.043) and masker toward the contralateral ear ( F(3,11) = 4.75, p = 0.023) configurations. They also reported significantly better abilities on the Speech Hearing ( F(3,13) = 5.19, p = 0.014) and Spatial Hearing ( F(3,13) = 10.22, p = 0.001) subscales., Conclusions: Adults with UHL and functional acoustic hearing in the implanted ear experience significant improvements in speech recognition and subjective hearing abilities within the initial months of EAS use as compared with preoperative performance and perceptions., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of Otology & Neurotology, Inc.)

Objectives: To investigate the incidence of electrode contacts within the functional acoustic hearing region in cochlear implant (CI) recipients and to assess its influence on speech recognition for electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) users., Study Design: Retrospective review., Setting: Tertiary referral center., Patients: One hundred five CI recipients with functional acoustic hearing preservation (≤80 dB HL at 250 Hz)., Interventions: Cochlear implantation with a 24-, 28-, or 31.5-mm lateral wall electrode array., Main Outcome Measures: Angular insertion depth (AID) of individual contacts was determined from imaging. Unaided acoustic thresholds and AID were used to calculate the proximity of contacts to the functional acoustic hearing region. The association between proximity values and speech recognition in quiet and noise for EAS users at 6 months postactivation was reviewed., Results: Sixty percent of cases had one or more contacts within the functional acoustic hearing region. Proximity was not significantly associated with speech recognition in quiet. Better performance in noise was observed for cases with close correspondence between the most apical contact and the upper edge of residual hearing, with poorer results for increasing proximity values in either the basal or apical direction ( r14 = 0.48, p = 0.043; r18 = -0.41, p = 0.045, respectively)., Conclusion: There was a high incidence of electrode contacts within the functional acoustic hearing region, which is not accounted for with default mapping procedures. The variability in outcomes across EAS users with default maps may be due in part to electric-on-acoustic interference, electric frequency-to-place mismatch, and/or failure to stimulate regions intermediate between the most apical electrode contact and the functional acoustic hearing region., Competing Interests: Disclosures of funding and conflicts of interest: Author K.D.B. serves on the surgical advisory board for MED-EL Corp and Advanced Bionics. M.T.D. is supported by a research grant from MED-EL Corporation. A.B.O. serves on the audiology advisory board for MED-EL Corporation and Advanced Bionics. She is also a consultant for Cochlear Corporation., (Copyright © 2023, Otology & Neurotology, Inc.)

Objectives: Facial dysmorphic disorder (FDD), a variant of body dysmorphic disorder, occurs when individuals are preoccupied with perceived defects in their facial appearance. Cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) requires many clinical interventions and has significant psychological impacts on a patient's perception of appearance. This study identified psychological burdens related to living as an adult with CL/P and characterizes the degree of FDD symptoms in an adult craniofacial population., Methods: This was a prospective, single-center, cross-sectional case-control study using semi-structured interviews and symptom assessments at a university-based craniofacial center. Patients without CL/P undergoing non-cosmetic facial surgery were recruited as controls (n = 20). Patients with an orofacial cleft (n = 30) were recruited from medical and dental providers at the University of North Carolina. Body Dysmorphic Disorder-Yale Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (BBD-YBOCS) scores were collected from a control population and patients with CL/P to assess FDD severity., Results: Demographic factors such age, biological sex, and ethnicity had no significant impact on FDD symptom scores. Patient with CL/P were more likely to have significant FDD symptoms (BDD-YBOCS greater than 16) than patients without CL/P (OR 10.5, CI 95 2.7-41.1), and had a mean difference in FDD symptoms scores of 10.04 (p < 0.0001; CI 95 5.5-14.6). Patients with CL/P seen by a mental health provider in the past 3 months had 3-fold lower overall FDD symptom scores (OR 0.081; CI 95 0.0085-0.77)., Conclusions: Adults with CL/P would benefit from treatment for cleft-specific needs and psychological support as they face unique stressors related to their appearance, including an increase in FDD-associated symptoms. This study emphasizes the importance of recognizing psychological symptoms and providing ongoing multidisciplinary care to adults with CL/P., Level of Evidence: 3; Individual case-control study Laryngoscope, 133:818-821, 2023., (© 2022 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.)

Purpose: Cochlear implant (CI) recipients with hearing preservation experience significant improvements in speech recognition with electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) as compared to with a CI alone, although outcomes across EAS users vary. The individual differences in performance may be due in part to default mapping procedures, which result in electric frequency-to-place mismatches for the majority of EAS users. This study assessed the influence of electric mismatches on the early speech recognition for EAS users., Method: Twenty-one participants were randomized at EAS activation to listen exclusively with a default or place-based map. For both groups, the unaided thresholds determined the acoustic cutoff frequency (i.e., > 65 dB HL). For default maps, the electric filter frequencies were assigned to avoid spectral gaps in frequency information but created varying magnitudes of mismatches. For place-based maps, the electric filter frequencies were assigned to avoid frequency-to-place mismatches. Recognition of consonant-nucleus-consonant words and vowels was assessed at activation and 1, 3, and 6 months postactivation., Results: For participants with default maps, electric mismatch at 1500 Hz ranged from 2 to -12.0 semitones ( Mdn = -5 semitones). Poorer performance was observed for those with larger magnitudes of electric mismatch. This effect was observed through 6 months of EAS listening experience., Conclusions: The present sample of EAS users experienced better initial performance when electric mismatches were small or eliminated. These data suggest the utility of methods that reduce electric mismatches, such as place-based mapping procedures. Investigation is ongoing to determine whether these differences persist with long-term EAS use., Supplemental Material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.22096523.

Introduction: Cochlear implant (CI) and electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) users may experience better performance with maps that align the electric filter frequencies to the cochlear place frequencies, known as place-based maps, than with maps that present spectrally shifted information. Individual place-based mapping procedures differ in the frequency content that is aligned to cochlear tonotopicity versus discarded or spectrally shifted. The performance benefit with different place-based maps may vary due to individual differences in angular insertion depth (AID) of the electrode array and whether functional acoustic low-frequency information is available in the implanted ear. The present study compared masked speech recognition with two types of place-based maps as a function of AID and presence of acoustic low-frequency information., Methods: Sixty adults with normal hearing listened acutely to CI or EAS simulations of two types of place-based maps for one of three cases of electrode arrays at shallow AIDs. The strict place-based (Strict-PB) map aligned the low- and mid-frequency information to cochlear tonotopicity and discarded information below the frequency associated with the most apical electrode contact. The alternative place-based map (LFshift-PB) aligned the mid-frequency information to cochlear tonotopicity and provided more of the speech spectrum by compressing low-frequency information on the apical electrode contacts (i.e., &lt;1 kHz). Three actual cases of a 12-channel, 24-mm electrode array were simulated by assigning the carrier frequency for an individual channel as the cochlear place frequency of the associated electrode contact. The AID and cochlear place frequency for the most apical electrode contact were 460° and 498 Hz for case 1, 389° and 728 Hz for case 2, and 335° and 987 Hz for case 3, respectively., Results: Generally, better performance was observed with the Strict-PB maps for cases 1 and 2, where mismatches were 2-4 octaves for the most apical channel with the LFshift-PB map. Similar performance was observed between maps for case 3. For the CI simulations, performance with the Strict-PB map declined with decreases in AID, while performance with the LFshift-PB map remained stable across cases. For the EAS simulations, performance with the Strict-PB map remained stable across cases, while performance with the LFshift-PB map improved with decreases in AID., Conclusions: Listeners demonstrated differences with the Strict-PB versus LFshift-PB maps as a function of AID and whether acoustic low-frequency information was available (CI vs. EAS). These data support the use of the Strict-PB mapping procedure for AIDs ≥335°, though further study including time for acclimatization in CI and EAS users is warranted., (© 2023 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Purpose: Cochlear implant (CI) recipients demonstrate variable speech recognition when listening with a CI-alone or electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) device, which may be due in part to electric frequency-to-place mismatches created by the default mapping procedures. Performance may be improved if the filter frequencies are aligned with the cochlear place frequencies, known as place-based mapping. Performance with default maps versus an experimental place-based map was compared for participants with normal hearing when listening to CI-alone or EAS simulations to observe potential outcomes prior to initiating an investigation with CI recipients., Method: A noise vocoder simulated CI-alone and EAS devices, mapped with default or place-based procedures. The simulations were based on an actual 24-mm electrode array recipient, whose insertion angles for each electrode contact were used to estimate the respective cochlear place frequency. The default maps used the filter frequencies assigned by the clinical software. The filter frequencies for the place-based maps aligned with the cochlear place frequencies for individual contacts in the low- to mid-frequency cochlear region. For the EAS simulations, low-frequency acoustic information was filtered to simulate aided low-frequency audibility. Performance was evaluated for the AzBio sentences presented in a 10-talker masker at +5 dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), +10 dB SNR, and asymptote., Results: Performance was better with the place-based maps as compared with the default maps for both CI-alone and EAS simulations. For instance, median performance at +10 dB SNR for the CI-alone simulation was 57% correct for the place-based map and 20% for the default map. For the EAS simulation, those values were 59% and 37% correct. Adding acoustic low-frequency information resulted in a similar benefit for both maps., Conclusions: Reducing frequency-to-place mismatches, such as with the experimental place-based mapping procedure, produces a greater benefit in speech recognition than maximizing bandwidth for CI-alone and EAS simulations. Ongoing work is evaluating the initial and long-term performance benefits in CI-alone and EAS users., Supplemental Material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.19529053.

Objectives: 1) To compare speech recognition outcomes between cochlear implant (CI) recipients of 28- and 31.5-mm lateral wall electrode arrays, and 2) to characterize the relationship between angular insertion depth (AID) and speech recognition., Study Design: Retrospective review., Setting: Tertiary academic referral center., Patients: Seventy-five adult CI recipients of fully inserted 28-mm (n = 28) or 31.5-mm (n = 47) lateral wall arrays listening with a CI-alone device., Interventions: Cochlear implantation with postoperative computed tomography., Main Outcome Measures: Consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) word recognition assessed with the CI-alone at 12 months postactivation., Results: The mean AID of the most apical electrode contact for the 31.5-mm array recipients was significantly deeper than the 28-mm array recipients (628° vs 571°, p < 0.001). Following 12 months of listening experience, mean CNC word scores were significantly better for recipients of 31.5-mm arrays compared with those implanted with 28-mm arrays (59.5% vs 48.3%, p = 0.004; Cohen's d = 0.70; 95% CI [0.22, 1.18]). There was a significant positive correlation between AID and CNC word scores (r = 0.372, p = 0.001), with a plateau in performance observed around 600°., Conclusions: Cochlear implant recipients implanted with a 31.5-mm array experienced better speech recognition than those with a 28-mm array at 12 months postactivation. Deeper insertion of a lateral wall array appears to confer speech recognition benefit up to ∼600°, with a plateau in performance observed thereafter. These data provide preliminary evidence of the insertion depth necessary to optimize speech recognition outcomes for lateral wall electrode arrays among CI-alone users., Competing Interests: This project was funded in part by the NIH through NIDCD (T32 DC005360). H.C.P., K.D.B., and B.P.O. have served on the surgical advisory board for MED-EL Corporation. H.C.P. is a consultant for MED-EL Corporation. B.P.O. is a consultant for Advanced Bionics and Johnson and Johnson. M.T.D. is supported by a research grant from MED-EL Corporation provided to the university. M.W.C. and M.M.D. declare that involvement in research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The authors disclose no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021, Otology & Neurotology, Inc.)

Introduction: Cochlear implant (CI) recipients with normal hearing (NH) in the contralateral ear experience a significant improvement in sound source localization when listening with the CI in combination with their NH-ear (CI + NH) as compared to with the NH-ear alone. The improvement in localization is primarily due to sensitivity to interaural level differences (ILDs). Sensitivity to interaural timing differences (ITDs) may be limited by auditory aging, frequency-to-place mismatches, the signal coding strategy, and duration of CI use. The present report assessed the sensitivity of ILD and ITD cues in CI + NH listeners who were recipients of long electrode arrays that provide minimal frequency-to-place mismatches and were mapped with a coding strategy that presents fine structure cues on apical channels., Methods: Sensitivity to ILDs and ITDs for localization was assessed using broadband noise (BBN), as well as high-pass (HP) and low-pass (LP) filtered noise for adult CI + NH listeners. Stimuli were 200-ms noise bursts presented from 11 speakers spaced evenly over an 180° arc. Performance was quantified in root-mean-squared error and response patterns were analyzed to evaluate the consistency, accuracy, and side bias of the responses. Fifteen listeners completed the task at the 2-year post-activation visit; seven listeners repeated the task at a later annual visit., Results: Performance at the 2-year visit was best with the BBN and HP stimuli and poorer with the LP stimulus. Responses to the BBN and HP stimuli were significantly correlated, consistent with the idea that CI + NH listeners primarily use ILD cues for localization. For the LP stimulus, some listeners responded consistently and accurately and with limited side bias, which may indicate sensitivity to ITD cues. Two of the 7 listeners who repeated the task at a later annual visit experienced a significant improvement in performance with the LP stimulus, which may indicate that sensitivity to ITD cues may improve with long-term CI use., Conclusions: CI recipients with a NH-ear primarily use ILD cues for sound source localization, though some may use ITD cues as well. Sensitivity to ITD cues may improve with long-term CI listening experience., (© 2022 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Objective: High rates of partial insertion have been reported for cochlear implant (CI) recipients of long lateral wall electrode arrays, presumably caused by resistance encountered during insertion due to cochlear morphology. With recent advances in long-electrode array design, we sought to investigate (1) the incidence of complete insertions among patients implanted with 31.5-mm flexible arrays and (2) whether complete insertion is limited by cochlear duct length (CDL)., Study Design: Retrospective review., Setting: Tertiary referral center., Methods: Fifty-one adult CI recipients implanted with 31.5-mm flexible lateral wall arrays underwent postoperative computed tomography to determine the rate of complete insertion, defined as all contacts being intracochlear. CDL and angular insertion depth (AID) were compared between complete and partial insertion cohorts., Results: Most cases had a complete insertion (96.1%, n = 49). Among the complete insertion cohort, the median CDL was 33.6 mm (range, 30.3-37.9 mm), and median AID was 641° (range, 533-751°). Two cases of partial insertion had relatively short CDL (31.8 mm and 32.3 mm) and shallow AID (542° and 575°). Relatively shallow AID for the 2 cases of partial insertion fails to support the idea that CDL alone prevents a complete insertion., Conclusion: Complete insertion of a 31.5-mm flexible array is feasible in most cases and does not appear to be limited by the range of CDL observed in this cohort. Future studies are needed to estimate other variations in cochlear morphology that could predict resistance and failure to achieve complete insertion with long arrays.

Objectives: To characterize the relationship between cochlear duct length (CDL) and initial hearing preservation among cochlear implant recipients of a fully inserted 31.5 mm flexible lateral wall electrode array., Study Design: Retrospective review., Setting: Tertiary academic referral center., Patients: Adult cochlear implant recipients who presented preoperatively with unaided hearing detection thresholds of ≤ 65 dB HL at 125 Hz and underwent cochlear implantation with a 31.5 mm flexible lateral wall array., Intervention: Cochlear implantation with a hearing preservation surgical approach., Main Outcome Measures: Computed tomography was reviewed to determine CDL. Hearing preservation was characterized by the shift in low-frequency pure-tone average (LFPTA; 125, 250, and 500 Hz), and shift in individual unaided hearing detection thresholds at 125, 250, and 500 Hz., Results: Nineteen patients met the criteria for inclusion. The mean CDL was 34.2 mm (range: 30.8-36.5 mm). Recipients experienced a mean LFPTA shift of 27.6 dB HL (range: 10-50 dB HL). Significant, negative correlations were observed between CDL and smaller threshold shifts at individual frequencies and LFPTA (p ≤ 0.048)., Conclusion: A longer CDL is associated with greater likelihood of preserving low-frequency hearing with long arrays. Low-frequency hearing preservation is feasible with fully inserted long flexible arrays within the initial months after cochlear implantation. Preoperative measurement of CDL may facilitate a more individualized approach in array selection to permit optimal cochlear coverage while enhancing hearing preservation outcomes., Competing Interests: This project was funded in part by the NIH through NIDCD (T32 DC005360). K.D.B. serves on the surgical advisory board for MED-EL Corporation. H.C.P. serves as a consultant for MED-EL Corporation and B.P.O. serves as a consultant for Advanced Bionics Corporation. M.T.D. and M.A.R. are supported by a research grant from MED-EL Corporation. E.S.H., M.W.C., A. L.B., S.A.D., A.Y., K.Q., and M.M.D. declare that involvement in research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021, Otology & Neurotology, Inc.)

Objectives/hypothesis: Speech recognition with a cochlear implant (CI) tends to be better for younger adults than older adults. However, older adults may take longer to reach asymptotic performance than younger adults. The present study aimed to characterize speech recognition as a function of age at implantation and listening experience for adult CI users., Study Design: Retrospective review., Methods: A retrospective review identified 352 adult CI recipients (387 ears) with at least 5 years of device listening experience. Speech recognition, as measured with consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) words in quiet and AzBio sentences in a 10-talker noise masker (10 dB signal-to-noise ratio), was reviewed at 1, 5, and 10 years postactivation., Results: Speech recognition was better in younger listeners, and performance was stable or continued to improve through 10 years of CI listening experience. There was no indication of differences in acclimatization as a function of age at implantation. For the better performing CI recipients, an effect of age at implantation was more apparent for sentence recognition in noise than for word recognition in quiet., Conclusions: Adult CI recipients across the age range examined here experience speech recognition benefit with a CI. However, older adults perform more poorly than young adults for speech recognition in quiet and noise, with similar age effects through 5 to 10 years of listening experience., Level of Evidence: 3 Laryngoscope, 131:2106-2111, 2021., (© 2021 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc..)

Objectives: Electrocochleography (ECochG), obtained before the insertion of a cochlear implant (CI) array, provides a measure of residual cochlear function that accounts for a substantial portion of variability in postoperative speech perception outcomes in adults. It is postulated that subsequent surgical factors represent independent sources of variance in outcomes. Prior work has demonstrated a positive correlation between angular insertion depth (AID) of straight arrays and speech perception under the CI-alone condition, with an inverse relationship observed for precurved arrays. The purpose of the present study was to determine the combined effects of ECochG, AID, and array design on speech perception outcomes., Design: Participants were 50 postlingually deafened adult CI recipients who received one of three straight arrays (MED-EL Flex24, MED-EL Flex28, and MED-EL Standard) and two precurved arrays (Cochlear Contour Advance and Advanced Bionics HiFocus Mid-Scala). Residual cochlear function was determined by the intraoperative ECochG total response (TR) measured before array insertion, which is the sum of magnitudes of spectral components in response to tones of different stimulus frequencies across the speech spectrum. The AID was then determined with postoperative imaging. Multiple linear regression was used to predict consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) word recognition in the CI-alone condition at 6 months postactivation based on AID, TR, and array design., Results: Forty-one participants received a straight array and nine received a precurved array. The AID of the most apical electrode contact ranged from 341° to 696°. The TR measured by ECochG accounted for 43% of variance in speech perception outcomes (p < 0.001). A regression model predicting CNC word scores with the TR tended to underestimate the performance for precurved arrays and deeply inserted straight arrays, and to overestimate the performance for straight arrays with shallower insertions. When combined in a multivariate linear regression, the TR, AID, and array design accounted for 72% of variability in speech perception outcomes (p < 0.001)., Conclusions: A model of speech perception outcomes that incorporates TR, AID, and array design represents an improvement over a model based on TR alone. The success of this model shows that peripheral factors including cochlear health and electrode placement may play a predominant role in speech perception with CIs., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To compare acute speech recognition with a cochlear implant (CI) alone or electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) device for place-based maps calculated with an organ of Corti (OC) versus a spiral ganglion (SG) frequency-to-place function., Patients: Eleven adult CI recipients of a lateral wall electrode array., Intervention: Postoperative imaging was used to derive place-based maps calculated with an OC versus SG function., Main Outcome Measure: Phoneme recognition was evaluated at initial activation with consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) words presented using an OC versus a SG place-based map., Results: For the 9 CI-alone users, there was a nonsignificant trend for better acute phoneme recognition with the SG map (mean 18 RAUs) than the OC map (mean 9 RAUs; p = 0.071, 95% CI [≤-1.2]). When including the 2 EAS users in the analysis, performance was significantly better with the SG map (mean 21 RAUs) than the OC map (mean 7 RAUs; p = 0.019, 95% CI [≤-6.2])., Conclusions: Better phoneme recognition with the SG frequency-to-place function could indicate more natural tonotopic alignment of information compared with the OC place-based map.A prospective, randomized investigation is currently underway to assess longitudinal outcomes with place-based mapping in CI-alone and EAS devices using the SG frequency-to-place function., Competing Interests: The authors disclose no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021, Otology & Neurotology, Inc.)

Objectives/hypothesis: Results from a prospective trial demonstrated better speech recognition for cochlear implant (CI) recipients implanted with a long lateral wall electrode array compared to subjects with a short array after 1 year of listening experience. As short array recipients may require an extended adaptation period, this study investigated whether differences in speech recognition continued through 4 years of CI use., Study Design: Long-term follow-up of a prospective randomized trial., Methods: Subjects were randomized to receive a MED-EL medium (24 mm) or standard (31.5 mm) array. Linear mixed models compared speech recognition between cohorts with word recognition in quiet and sentence recognition in noise at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 months postactivation. Postoperative imaging and electric frequency filters were reviewed to assess the influence of frequency-to-place mismatch and angular separation between neighboring contacts, a metric associated with peripheral spectral selectivity., Results: Long (31.5 mm) array recipients demonstrated superior speech recognition out to 4 years postactivation. There was a significant effect of angular separation between contacts, with more closely spaced contacts associated with poorer speech recognition. There was no significant effect of mismatch, yet this may have been obscured by changes in frequency filters over time., Conclusions: Conventional MED-EL CI recipients implanted with 31.5-mm arrays experience better speech recognition than 24-mm array recipients, initially and with long-term listening experience. The benefit conferred by longer arrays in the present cohort can be partially attributed to more widely spaced electrode contacts, presumably a result of reduced channel interaction., Level of Evidence: 2 Laryngoscope, 131:892-897, 2021., (© 2020 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.)

Objective: This study assessed the effect of ipsilateral bone-conduction amplification on spatial hearing abilities in subjects with congenital unilateral aural atresia (CUAA)., Patients: Twelve patients with unilateral conductive hearing loss secondary to CUAA and normal hearing in the contralateral ear were tested. Most (75%) had limited experience with a bone-conduction hearing aid (BCHA)., Intervention: Performance was evaluated with and without a BCHA fitted acutely on a softband., Main Outcome Measures: Spatial hearing abilities were evaluated in two paradigms. Spatial release from masking was evaluated by comparing masked sentence recognition with a target and two speech maskers either colocated at 0 degree or with the maskers separated at +90 degrees and -90 degrees. Sound source localization was evaluated in a 180 degrees arc of loudspeakers on the horizontal plane. Performance was evaluated at 50 and 75 dB SPL, and results were compared for patients tested with and without a BCHA., Results: Group level results indicate similar spatial release from masking in the aided and unaided conditions at both presentation levels. Localization at 50 dB SPL was similar aided and unaided, but at 75 dB SPL the root mean square error was lower unaided than aided (17.2 degrees vs 41.3 degrees; p = 0.010)., Conclusions: Use of a BCHA in patients with CUAA may interfere with auditory cues required for sound source localization when the signal level is intense enough to overcome the patient's conductive hearing loss. These findings have potential clinical implications in fitting of BCHAs to support optimal spatial hearing in patients with CUAA., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2020, Otology & Neurotology, Inc.)

Background: Balloon sinuplasty is increasingly used in the outpatient clinic for treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis, but radiologic analysis of its effects on sinonasal anatomy is largely uncharacterized in the known literature., Objective: The purpose of this study is to examine the anatomic effects of balloon sinuplasty in a cadaveric model., Methods: Five fresh cadaver heads underwent sequential endoscopic balloon dilation of maxillary ostia, frontal recess outflow tracts, and sphenoid ostia bilaterally by fellowship-trained rhinologists. Pre- and post-procedural CT imaging was obtained. CT scans were imported into Mimics™ software and sinonasal anatomy was analyzed systematically., Results: Visual confirmation of balloon dilation was achieved in all 3 sites bilaterally in each cadaver. Radiologic analysis demonstrated that the frontal sinus outflow tract was appropriately dilated 60% (6/10 sites) of the time while the agger was inadvertently dilated 30% of the time (3/10). The sphenoid os was successfully dilated 70% (7/10 sites) of the time. In two cases, a posterior sphenoethmoid (Onodi) cell was dilated instead of the sphenoid. Successful dilation of maxillary os was noted 60% of the time (6/10 sites). No significant change in maxillary os was noted after balloon dilation. Normal middle turbinates were significantly medialized following balloon dilation 75% (6/8 sites) of the time., Conclusions: While the goal of balloon sinuplasty is to improve natural sinonasal drainage by dilating existing outflow tracts, as evidenced by radiologic evaluation the procedure appears not to achieve this in all cases, while occasionally creating unintended changes in sinonasal anatomy as well. These unrecognized changes in anatomy may be responsible for the post-procedure change in symptomatology that some patients experience.

Background: The default mapping procedure for electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) devices uses the cochlear implant recipient's unaided detection thresholds in the implanted ear to derive the acoustic settings and assign the lowest frequency filter of electric stimulation. Individual differences for speech recognition with EAS may be due to discrepancies between the electric frequency filters of individual electrode contacts and the cochlear place of stimulation, known as a frequency-to-place mismatch. Frequency-to-place mismatch of greater than 1/2 octave has been demonstrated in up to 60% of EAS users. Aligning the electric frequency filters via a place-based mapping procedure using postoperative imaging may improve speech recognition with EAS., Methods: Masked sentence recognition was evaluated for normal-hearing subjects (n = 17) listening with vocoder simulations of EAS, using a place-based map and a default map. Simulation parameters were based on audiometric and imaging data from a representative 24-mm electrode array recipient and EAS user. The place-based map aligned electric frequency filters with the cochlear place frequency, which introduced a gap between the simulated acoustic and electric output. The default map settings were derived from the clinical programming software and provided the full speech frequency range., Results: Masked sentence recognition was significantly better for simulated EAS with the place-based map as compared with the default map., Conclusion: The simulated EAS place-based map supported better performance than the simulated EAS default map. This indicates that individualizing maps may improve performance in EAS users by helping them achieve better asymptotic performance earlier and mitigate the need for acclimatization.

Objectives: The spatial position of a cochlear implant (CI) electrode array affects the spectral cues provided to the recipient. Differences in cochlear size and array length lead to substantial variability in angular insertion depth (AID) across and within array types. For CI-alone users, the variability in AID results in varying degrees of frequency-to-place mismatch between the default electric frequency filters and cochlear place of stimulation. For electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) users, default electric frequency filters also vary as a function of residual acoustic hearing in the implanted ear. The present study aimed to (1) investigate variability in AID associated with lateral wall arrays, (2) determine the subsequent frequency-to-place mismatch for CI-alone and EAS users mapped with default frequency filters, and (3) examine the relationship between early speech perception for CI-alone users and two aspects of electrode position: frequency-to-place mismatch and angular separation between neighboring contacts, a metric associated with spectral selectivity at the periphery., Design: One hundred one adult CI recipients (111 ears) with MED-EL Flex24 (24 mm), Flex28 (28 mm), and FlexSOFT/Standard (31.5 mm) arrays underwent postoperative computed tomography to determine AID. A subsequent comparison was made between AID, predicted spiral ganglion place frequencies, and the default frequency filters for CI-alone (n = 84) and EAS users (n = 27). For CI-alone users with complete insertions who listened with maps fit with the default frequency filters (n = 48), frequency-to-place mismatch was quantified at 1500 Hz and angular separation between neighboring contacts was determined for electrodes in the 1 to 2 kHz region. Multiple linear regression was used to examine how frequency-to-place mismatch and angular separation of contacts influence consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) scores through 6 months postactivation., Results: For CI recipients with complete insertions (n = 106, 95.5%), the AID (mean ± standard deviation) of the most apical contact was 428° ± 34.3° for Flex24 (n = 11), 558° ± 65.4° for Flex28 (n = 48), and 636° ± 42.9° for FlexSOFT/Standard (n = 47) arrays. For CI-alone users, default frequency filters aligned closely with the spiral ganglion map for deeply inserted lateral wall arrays. For EAS users, default frequency filters produced a range of mismatches; absolute deviations of ≤ 6 semitones occurred in only 37% of cases. Participants with shallow insertions and minimal or no residual hearing experienced the greatest mismatch. For CI-alone users, both smaller frequency-to-place mismatch and greater angular separation between contacts were associated with better CNC scores during the initial 6 months of device use., Conclusions: There is significant variability in frequency-to-place mismatch among CI-alone and EAS users with default frequency filters, even between individuals implanted with the same array. When using default frequency filters, mismatch can be minimized with longer lateral wall arrays and insertion depths that meet the edge frequency associated with residual hearing for CI-alone and EAS users, respectively. Smaller degrees of frequency-to-place mismatch and decreased peripheral masking due to more widely spaced contacts may independently support better speech perception with longer lateral wall arrays in CI-alone users.

Background: Angular insertion depth (AID) of the electrode array provides valuable information regarding intracochlear positioning, which can be used to predict outcomes and optimize performance. While computed tomography (CT) offers high-resolution imaging, there is a need to develop technology to accurately determine AID from intraoperative x-rays acquired at unknown angles., Methods: An algorithm was developed using a three-dimensional model of the scala tympani to estimate AID from an x-ray acquired at an unknown angle. The model is manipulated over the x-ray until the projection angle is inferred and the location of the round window and individual electrode contacts are identified. Validation of the algorithm involved 1) assessing accuracy with deviation from cochlear view by comparing AID determined with simulated x-rays to those determined with CT in a temporal bone model, and 2) assessing reproducibility in the clinical setting, by comparing intra- and inter-rater reliability with intraoperative x-ray in cochlear implant (CI) recipients, which were subsequently compared to AID determined with postoperative CT., Results: Estimates of AID from x-rays were generally within 10 degrees of CT regardless of deviation from cochlear view. Excluding two outliers with poor imaging quality, the intraclass correlation coefficients for intra- and inter-rater reliability were excellent (0.991 and 0.980, respectively)., Conclusion: With intraoperative x-rays of sufficient quality, the helical scala tympani model can be used to accurately and reliably determine AID without the need to specify a preferred image angle. The application can therefore be used in most CI recipients when a postoperative CT is not available.

Objective: Default frequency filters of cochlear implant (CI) devices assign frequency information irrespective of intracochlear position, resulting in varying degrees of frequency-to-place mismatch. Substantial mismatch negatively influences speech recognition in postlingually deafened CI recipients, and acclimatization may be particularly challenging for older adults due to effects of aging on the auditory pathway. The present report investigated the influence of mismatch and age at implantation on speech recognition within the initial 6 months of CI use., Study Design: Retrospective review., Setting: Tertiary referral center., Subjects and Methods: Forty-eight postlingually deafened adult CI recipients of lateral wall electrode arrays underwent postoperative computed tomography to determine angular insertion depth of each electrode contact. Frequency-to-place mismatch was determined by comparing spiral ganglion place frequencies to default frequency filters. Consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) scores in the CI-alone condition at 1, 3, and 6 months postactivation were compared to the degree of mismatch at 1500 Hz and age at implantation., Results: Younger adult CI recipients experienced more rapid growth in speech recognition during the initial 6 months postactivation. Greater degrees of frequency-to-place mismatch were associated with poorer performance, yet older listeners were not particularly susceptible to this effect., Conclusions: While older adults are not necessarily more sensitive to detrimental effects of frequency-to-place mismatch, other factors appear to limit early benefit with a CI in this population. These results suggest that minimizing mismatch could optimize outcomes in adult CI recipients across the life span, which may be particularly beneficial in the elderly considering auditory processing deficits associated with advanced age.

Hypothesis: Patients with moderate-to-severe unilateral conductive hearing loss (UCHL) can make use of binaural difference cues when stimuli are presented at a high enough intensity to provide audibility in the affected ear., Background: Spatial hearing is essential for listening in complex environments and sound source localization. Patients with UCHL have decreased access to binaural difference cues, resulting in poorer spatial hearing abilities compared with listeners with normal hearing., Methods: Twelve patients with moderate-to-severe UCHL, most due to atresia (83.3%), and 12 age-matched controls with normal hearing bilaterally participated in this study. Outcome measures included: 1) spatial release from masking, and 2) sound source localization. Speech reception thresholds were measured with target speech (Pediatric AzBio sentences) presented at 0 degree and a two-talker masker that was either colocated with the target (0 degree) or spatially separated from the target (symmetrical, ±90 degrees). Spatial release from masking was quantified as the difference between speech reception thresholds in these two conditions. Localization ability in the horizontal plane was assessed in a 180 degree arc of 11 evenly-spaced loudspeakers. These two tasks were completed at 50 and 75 dB SPL., Results: Both children and adults with UCHL performed more poorly than controls when recognizing speech in a spatially separated masker or localizing sound; however, this group difference was larger at 50 than 75 dB SPL., Conclusion: Patients with UCHL experience improved spatial hearing with the higher presentation level, suggesting that the auditory deprivation associated with a moderate-to-severe UCHL does not preclude exposure to-or use of-binaural difference cues.

A prospective clinical trial evaluated the effectiveness of cochlear implantation in adults with asymmetric hearing loss (AHL). Twenty subjects with mild-to-moderate hearing loss in the better ear and moderate-to-profound hearing loss in the poorer ear underwent cochlear implantation of the poorer hearing ear. Subjects were evaluated preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-activation. Preoperative performance was evaluated unaided, with traditional hearing aids (HAs) or with a bone-conduction HA. Post-activation performance was evaluated with the cochlear implant (CI) alone or in combination with a contralateral HA (bimodal). Test measures included subjective benefit, word recognition, and spatial hearing (i.e., localization and masked sentence recognition). Significant subjective benefit was reported as early as the 1-month interval, indicating better performance with the CI compared with the preferred preoperative condition. Aided word recognition with the CI alone was significantly improved at the 1-month interval compared with preoperative performance with an HA and continued to improve through the 12-month interval. Subjects demonstrated early, significant improvements in the bimodal condition on the spatial hearing tasks compared with baseline preoperative performance tested unaided. The magnitude of the benefit was reduced for subjects with AHL when compared with published data on CI users with normal hearing in the contralateral ear; this finding may reflect significant differences in age at implantation and hearing sensitivity across cohorts.

Objective: The objective of this study is to determine the reliability of a new tablet-based software that utilizes postoperative computed tomography to determine angular insertion depth (AID), cochlear duct length (CDL), and the cochlear place frequency of individual electrodes in cochlear implant recipients., Patients: Twenty adult cochlear implant recipients with lateral-wall electrode arrays of varying lengths were included in the study., Intervention: Cochlear and electrode array measurements were made by 2 otolaryngologists using a tablet-based software. The user manually identifies the modiolus, round window, and each electrode contact to calculate AID. The user also manually identifies cochlear landmarks to calculate the CDL. The AID and CDL are applied to the Greenwood function to obtain an estimate of the cochlear place frequency for each electrode., Main Outcome Measure(s): The primary outcome measure was the reliability of the instrument, as assessed with intra and interrater reliability of measured AID and CDL. The resultant differences in the estimated cochlear place frequency of the most apical electrode were also evaluated., Results: A broad range of AIDs were observed (390°-659°). Intraclass correlation coefficients for intra (0.991) and interrater reliability (0.980) of AID of the most apical electrode contact were excellent. Intra (0.820) and interrater reliability (0.784) of CDL were also excellent. The estimated cochlear place frequency for the most apical electrode differed by an average of 6.7% (0-18.7%) across the 2 raters., Conclusion: There is excellent agreement amongst clinicians in the determination of AID and CDL, resulting in small changes in estimated cochlear place frequency of the most apical electrode using this new software.