Search

Purpose: To assess whether corneal nerve analysis can identify and differentiate patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) from those with epilepsy., Methods: Participants with MS (n = 83), participants with epilepsy (n = 50), and healthy controls (HCs) (n = 20) underwent corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) and quantification of automated corneal nerve fiber length (ACNFL), automated corneal nerve fractal dimension (ACNFrD), and ACNFrD/ACNFL ratio of the subbasal nerve plexus., Results: ACNFL (MS: P < 0.0001; epilepsy: P = 0.002) and ACNFrD (MS: P < 0.0001; epilepsy: P = 0.025) were significantly lower and the ACNFrD/ACNFL ratio (MS: P < 0.0001; epilepsy: P = 0.018) was significantly higher compared to HCs. ACNFL (P = 0.001), ACNFrD (P = 0.0003), and ACNFrD/ACNFL ratio (P = 0.006) were significantly lower in patients with MS compared to those with epilepsy. ACNFL had the highest diagnostic utility for identifying patients with MS (sensitivity/specificity 0.86/0.85, area under the curve [AUC] 0.90, P < 0.0001), and ACNFrD had the highest diagnostic utility for identifying patients with epilepsy (sensitivity/specificity 0.78/0.75, AUC 0.76, P = 0.0008). ACNFrD had the highest diagnostic utility for differentiating patients with MS from epilepsy (sensitivity/specificity 0.66/0.65, AUC 0.70, <0.0001)., Conclusions: Corneal neurodegeneration occurs in and is characterized by a distinct pattern that differentiates patients with MS and epilepsy., Translational Relevance: CCM identifies and differentiates patients with MS and epilepsy, albeit with moderate performance. Further validation, with a larger sample size, is needed.

Cladribine tablets (CladT), like alemtuzumab, acts as an immune reconstitution therapy. However, CladT is administered orally (alemtuzumab is given by infusion) and without the potential for serious side effects that limit the therapeutic use of alemtuzumab in multiple sclerosis (MS). Treatment with CladT, given initially as short courses of treatment 1 year apart, provides years of freedom from MS disease activity in responders to treatment. The appearance of mild or moderate MS disease activity after the initial 2 years of treatment may prompt careful follow-up or a further course of CladT, depending on the nature of the activity and individual circumstances. The appearance of severe MS disease activity requires a switch to an alternative high-efficacy disease-modifying treatment (DMT). The accumulating data from CladT-treated people with MS in real-world studies, including those with follow-up durations extending for years beyond the initial treatment, have demonstrated long-term freedom from MS disease activity in a good proportion of patients. This clinical experience has also confirmed that treatment with CladT is generally safe and well tolerated. The best time to prescribe a high-efficacy DMT is the subject of debate, with evidence that earlier versus later use of such agents may provide more effective long-term protection from disability progression. High-efficacy DMTs have traditionally been reserved for use in people with MS and high disease activity on presentation or breakthrough disease on one or more DMTs, as per the current product labels. The latest evidence from real-world studies suggests that CladT is effective and safe in DMT-naïve patients, including those with shorter disease duration., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

The increasing availability of high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies (DMT) for the management of relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) has increased the potential for individualised patient management but has added complexity to the design of treatment regimens. The long-term application of immune reconstitution therapy (IRT) is supported by an increasing database of real world studies that have added important information on the long-term safety and efficacy of this approach. Cladribine tablets (CladT) is an IRT given as two annual short courses of treatment, following which a majority of patients then demonstrate no significant MS disease activity over a period of years. Whether, and how, to treat patients beyond the first two years of treatment remains a matter for debate, as clinical evidence accumulates. We, a group of neurologists who manage people with RMS in Qatar, provide our expert consensus recommendations on the application and long-term management of CladT therapy based on our experience with treatment in the last 5 years. These include pragmatic recommendations for people with MS disease activity in years 3 and 4 (ie up to four years following first dose of CladT), and for people with or without MS disease activity in subsequent years. We believe our recommendations will help to ensure the optimal application of CladT-based IRT, with the potential benefit for the patient of achieving prolonged periods free of both MS disease symptoms and the burden of regular applications of immunosuppressive DMT., Competing Interests: DD has served on Advisory Boards of Merck, Novartis, Biologix, Roche and Sanofi and is a member of MENACTRIMS. BC has received travel, speaker and consultant honoraria from Merck, Novartis, Biologix, Roche and Sanofi. OE received an honorarium from Merck. MSA reported no duality of interest additional to participation in the consensus meeting funded by Merck Serono Middle East FZ-Ltd, Dubai, UAE, an affiliate of Merck KGaA described in the “Funding” section. AB is an employee of Merck Serono Middle East FZ-Ltd, Dubai, UAE, an affiliate of Merck KGaA. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work., (© 2023 Deleu et al.)

Background: Corneal immune cells (ICs) are antigen-presenting cells that are known to increase ocular and systemic inflammatory conditions., Objective: We aimed to assess longitudinal changes in corneal IC in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and relation to disability and ongoing treatment., Design: Prospective observational study conducted between September 2016 and February 2020., Methods: Patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) ( n  = 45) or secondary progressive MS (SPMS) ( n  = 15) underwent corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) at baseline and 2-year follow-up for estimation of corneal IC density [dendritic cells with (DCF) (cells/mm 2 ) or without nerve fiber contact (DCP); and non-dendritic cells with (NCF) or without nerve fiber contact (NCP)]. Optical coherence tomography, neuroimaging, and disability assessments were additionally performed. Healthy controls ( n  = 20) were assessed at baseline., Results: In both RRMS and SPMS compared to controls, DCP ( p  < 0.001 and p  < 0.001, respectively) and DCF ( p  < 0.001 and p  = 0.005) were higher and NCF ( p  = 0.007 and p  = 0.02) was lower at baseline. DCP showed excellent performance in identifying patients with MS (sensitivity/specificity = 0.88/0.90) followed by DCF (0.80/0.75) and NCF (0.80/0.85). At follow-up compared to baseline, DCP ( p  = 0.01) was significantly reduced, and NCP ( p  = 0.004) and NCF ( p  = 0.04) were increased. Subgroup analysis showed that baseline NCP and NCF were significantly higher ( p  = 0.04-0.05) in patients who switched disease-modifying treatment, and baseline NCP ( p  = 0.05) was higher in patients on interferon., Conclusion: Baseline and change in corneal IC were related to axonal degeneration and treatment status. Evaluation of corneal IC using CCM may allow an assessment of ongoing inflammation, disease progression, and the effect of treatment in MS., Competing Interests: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest., (© The Author(s), 2023.)

Background: Resourceful endpoints of axonal loss are needed to predict the course of multiple sclerosis (MS). Corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) can detect axonal loss in patients with clinically isolated syndrome and established MS, which relates to neurological disability., Objective: To assess corneal axonal loss over time in relation to retinal atrophy, and neurological and radiological abnormalities in MS., Methods: Patients with relapsing-remitting (RRMS) ( n  = 68) or secondary progressive MS (SPMS) ( n  = 15) underwent CCM and optical coherence tomography. Corneal nerve fibre density (CNFD-fibres/mm 2 ), corneal nerve branch density (CNBD-branches/mm 2 ), corneal nerve fibre length (CNFL-mm/mm 2 ) and retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL-μm) thickness were quantified along with neurological and radiological assessments at baseline and after 2 years of follow-up. Age-matched, healthy controls ( n  = 20) were also assessed., Results: In patients with RRMS compared with controls at baseline, CNFD ( p  = 0.004) and RNFL thickness ( p  < 0.001) were lower, and CNBD ( p  = 0.003) was higher. In patients with SPMS compared with controls, CNFD ( p  < 0.001), CNFL ( p  = 0.04) and RNFL thickness ( p  < 0.001) were lower. For identifying RRMS, CNBD had the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve (0.99); and for SPMS, CNFD had the highest AUROC (0.95). At follow-up, there was a further significant decrease in CNFD ( p  = 0.04), CNBD ( p  = 0.001), CNFL ( p  = 0.008) and RNFL ( p  = 0.002) in RRMS; in CNFD ( p  = 0.04) and CNBD ( p  = 0.002) in SPMS; and in CNBD ( p  = 0.01) in SPMS compared with RRMS. Follow-up corneal nerve loss was greater in patients with new enhancing lesions and optic neuritis history., Conclusion: Progressive corneal and retinal axonal loss was identified in patients with MS, especially those with more active disease. CCM may serve as an imaging biomarker of axonal loss in MS., Competing Interests: The authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article: Drs Ioannis N. Petropoulos, Fatima Al-Shibani, Gulfidan Bitirgen, Georgios Ponirakis, Adnan Khan, Hoda Gad, Ziyad R. Mahfoud, Heba Altarawneh, Muhammad Hassan Rehman, Karen John, Dhabia Al-Merekhi, Pooja George, Ali Ulvi Uca, Ahmet Ozkagnici, Faiza Ibrahim, Reny Francis, Beatriz Canibano, Dirk Deleu, Ahmed El-Sotouhy, Surjith Vattoth, Ahmed Own, Ashfaq Shuaib, Naveed Akhtar and Saadat Kamran declare no conflict of interest. Dr. Rayaz A. Malik is a principal investigator on grants from Proctor and Gamble and Pfizer and has received consulting honoraria for serving on advisory boards for Novo Nordisk, Aventis Pharma, and Proctor and Gamble., (© The Author(s), 2023.)

Background: Tumor necrosis factor antagonists (anti-TNF- α ) are an established therapeutic option for several autoimmune and inflammatory bowel diseases. Despite their clinical effectiveness, neurological adverse events have been reported, and literature data suggest a potential role of anti-TNF- α in the induction of demyelination. Case Presentation . In this series, we present three cases of demyelination after the use of anti-TNF- α agents. The first case involved a 21-year-old man with HLA-B27 negative peripheral spondylarthritis who had been taking adalimumab for 2 years. He developed headache, urinary incontinence, and bilateral lower extremity numbness that progressed to the middle of the trunk for 2 days. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed multiple hyperintense enhancement lesions in the left paramedian anterior pons consistent with multiple sclerosis (MS). The second case included a 17-year-old woman who was on 2 years of adalimumab treatment for juvenile idiopathic arthritis and chronic anterior uveitis and developed new-onset dizziness and tremors. The clinical examination showed signs of cerebellar dysfunction. MRI findings were consistent with multiple sclerosis. The third case was a 34-year-old male who was on 5 years of infliximab treatment for ankylosing spondylitis when he developed left hand numbness and weakness. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis and MRI findings were consistent with demyelination. Discontinuation of tumor necrosis factor antagonists (anti-TNF- α ) resulted in resolution of the symptoms with no recurrence in the first case, but there was evidence of recurrence in the other 2 cases, where one was managed with rituximab and the second one improved with pulse steroid therapy., Conclusion: Despite the small number of patients, our series adds to the growing body of evidence supporting a causal link between anti-TNF- α agents and demyelination. Thus, we can conclude that on suspicion of any neurological side effects, early discontinuation of the TNF- α blockers and requesting urgent MRI scan to confirm the diagnosis is of utmost importance., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Miral H. Gharib et al.)

This article describes consensus recommendations from an expert group of neurologists from the Arabian Gulf region on the management of relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) in the COVID-19 era. MS appears not to be a risk factor for severe adverse COVID-19 outcomes (though patients with advanced disability or a progressive phenotype are at higher risk). Disease-modifying therapy (DMT)-based care appears generally safe for patients with MS who develop COVID-19 (although there may be an increased risk of adverse outcomes with anti-CD20 therapy). Interferon-β, teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate, glatiramer acetate, natalizumab and cladribine tablets are unlikely to increase the risk of infection; fingolimod, anti-CD20 agents and alemtuzumab may confer an intermediate risk. Existing DMT therapy should be continued at this time. For patients requiring initiation of a DMT, all currently available DMTs except alemtuzumab can be started safely at this time; initiate alemtuzumab subject to careful individual risk-benefit considerations. Patients should receive vaccination against COVID-19 where possible, with no interruption of existing DMT-based care. There is no need to alter the administration of interferon-β, teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate, glatiramer acetate, natalizumab, fingolimod or cladribine tablets for vaccination; new starts on other DMTs should be delayed for up to 6 weeks after completion of vaccination to allow the immune response to develop. Doses of the Oxford University/AstraZeneca vaccine may be scheduled around doses of anti-CD20 or alemtuzumab. Where white cell counts are suppressed by treatment, these should be allowed to recover before vaccination., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Background Myocardial injury has been defined as an elevated troponin level. The frequency of acute myocardial injury of hospitalized coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients ranges from 7% to 36%. COVID-19 patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) have a four-fold higher risk of mortality (odds ratio, 4.33; CI 95%, 3.16-5.94). In COVID-19 hospitalized patients' study showed mortality rate was 18.5%. Rhabdomyolysis is considered as muscle necrosis and the release of intracellular muscles elements and enzymes into blood. In one of retrospective cohort study of COVID-19 hospitalized patients, incidence of rhabdomyolysis was 16.7%. Materials and methods This retrospective observational study consisted of 413 COVID-19 hospitalized patients. Patients with rhabdomyolysis was defined as creatine kinase level greater than 1,000 U/L and acute myocardial injury was defined as serum high-sensitivity troponin-T for males greater than 30 ng/l and for female greater than 20 ng/l. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality of COVID-19 patients with acute myocardial injury and rhabdomyolysis.  Results The incidence of acute myocardial injury and rhabdomyolysis in hospitalized COVID-19 patients was 23.9% (99) and 15.7% (65), respectively. The mortality rate of in hospitalized COVID-19 patients who developed acute myocardial injury (28.3%) was significantly higher in comparison to patients who developed rhabdomyolysis (13.8%). Discussion The binding of SARS-CoV-2 virus to the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) is a critical step in the pathophysiology in patients with COVID-19. There may be diverse direct and indirect mechanisms of acute myocardial injury in COVID-19 including ischemic injury, hypoxic injury (MI type 2), direct viral myocarditis, stress cardiomyopathy and systemic cytokine storm. Musculoskeletal injury may be caused by direct viral myositis or indirectly by host immune hyperinflammatory cytokine storm response that leads to skeletal muscle fiber proteolysis and fibrosis. Conclusions Acute myocardial injury and rhabdomyolysis were underreported in COVID-19 patients. The incidence and mortality of acute myocardial injury are higher than that of rhabdomyolysis in COVID-19 hospitalized patients. The outcome was worse in COVID-19 patients with severe acute myocardial injury. Patients with acute myocardial injury and rhabdomyolysis may get benefits from rehabilitation programs., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2021, Ali et al.)

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-Cov-2) may cause various neuro-ophthalmologic manifestations including optic perineuritis. Optic perineuritis is a rare form of orbital inflammatory disease in which optic nerve sheath is inflamed and nonspecific fibrotic thickening with classic radiological finding is a perineural enhancement of optic nerve sheath. A 45-year-old gentleman with known diabetes mellitus, hypertension and dyslipidemia was admitted with a critically ill COVID-19 infection. During the recovery period, the patient developed sudden onset of painless loss of vision. MRI head and orbit with gadolinium was suggestive of optic perineuritis. Other secondary causes of autoimmune or vasculitis myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibody disease and other common central nervous system (CNS) infection were excluded. The patient had dramatic response with steroids. This is the first rare case report of COVID-19-related optic perineuritis in critically ill COVID-19 patients with seronegative MOG antibody. Optic perineuritis is a rare orbital inflammatory disease and underlying mechanisms may arise from systemic response to COVID-19 infection as well as direct effects of the virus via angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE-2) receptors on ocular tissues. Optic perineuritis is a rare disease with inflammation restricted to the optic nerve sheath. Neuroimaging of the brain and orbit is the most important modality of choice for visualizing optic nerve sheath and optic nerve. Delay in the diagnosis of COVID-19-related optic perineuritis, may result in permanent optic nerve injury and irreversible vision loss., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2021, Ali et al.)

This article describes consensus recommendations from an expert group of neurologists from the Arabian Gulf region on the management of relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) in the COVID-19 era. MS appears not to be a risk factor for severe adverse COVID-19 outcomes (though patients with advanced disability or a progressive phenotype are at higher risk). Disease-modifying therapy (DMT)-based care appears generally safe for patients with MS who develop COVID-19 (although there may be an increased risk of adverse outcomes with anti-CD20 therapy). Interferon-β, teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate, glatiramer acetate, natalizumab and cladribine tablets are unlikely to increase the risk of infection; fingolimod, anti-CD20 agents and alemtuzumab may confer an intermediate risk. Existing DMT therapy should be continued at this time. For patients requiring initiation of a DMT, all currently available DMTs except alemtuzumab can be started safely at this time; initiate alemtuzumab subject to careful individual risk-benefit considerations. Patients should receive vaccination against COVID-19 where possible, with no interruption of existing DMT-based care. There is no need to alter the administration of interferon-β, teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate, glatiramer acetate, natalizumab, fingolimod or cladribine tablets for vaccination; new starts on other DMTs should be delayed for up to 6 weeks after completion of vaccination to allow the immune response to develop. Doses of the Oxford University/AstraZeneca vaccine may be scheduled around doses of anti-CD20 or alemtuzumab. Where white cell counts are suppressed by treatment, these should be allowed to recover before vaccination., (© The Author(s) 2021.)

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) is a prime focus for clinicians to maintain the homeostatic function in health and deliver the theranostics in brain cancer and number of neurological diseases. The structural hierarchy and in situ biochemical signaling of BBB neurovascular unit have been primary targets to recapitulate into the in vitro modules. The microengineered perfusion systems and development in 3D cellular and organoid culture have given a major thrust to BBB research for neuropharmacology. In this review, we focus on revisiting the nanoparticles based bimolecular engineering to enable them to maneuver, control, target, and deliver the theranostic payloads across cellular BBB as nanorobots or nanobots. Subsequently we provide a brief outline of specific case studies addressing the payload delivery in brain tumor and neurological disorders (e.g., Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, etc.). In addition, we also address the opportunities and challenges across the nanorobots' development and design. Finally, we address how computationally powered machine learning (ML) tools and artificial intelligence (AI) can be partnered with robotics to predict and design the next generation nanorobots to interact and deliver across the BBB without causing damage, toxicity, or malfunctions. The content of this review could be references to multidisciplinary science to clinicians, roboticists, chemists, and bioengineers involved in cutting-edge pharmaceutical design and BBB research.

Most disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) are contraindicated in pregnancy. Management of MS is especially challenging for pregnant patients, as withdrawal of DMDs leave the patient at risk of increased disease activity. We, a group of experts in MS care from countries in the Arab Gulf, present our consensus recommendations on the management of MS in these patients. Where possible, a patient planning pregnancy can be switched to a DMD considered safe in this setting. Interferon β now can be used during pregnancy, where there is a clinical need to maintain treatment, in addition to glatiramer acetate. Natalizumab (usually to 30 weeks' gestation for patients with high disease activity at high risk of relapse and disability progression) may also be continued into pregnancy. Cladribine tablets and alemtuzumab have been hypothesised to act as immune reconstitution therapies (IRTs). These drugs provide a period of prolonged freedom from relapses for many patients, but the patient must be prepared to wait for up to 20 months from initiation of therapy before becoming pregnant. If a patient becomes pregnant while taking fingolimod, and requires continued DMD treatment, a switch to interferon β or natalizumab after a variable washout period may be prescribed, depending on the level of disease activity. Women who wish to breastfeed should be encouraged to do so, and interferon β may also be used during breastfeeding. There is a lack of data regarding the safety of using other DMDs during breastfeeding.

Recent research has expanded our understanding of the natural history and clinical course of multiple sclerosis (MS) in the Arabian Gulf region. In addition, the number of available therapies for MS has increased greatly in recent years, which complicates considerably the design of therapeutic regimens. We, an expert group of physicians practising in Arabian Gulf countries, present pragmatic consensus recommendations for the use of disease-modifying therapy, according to the level of MS disease activity, according to objective criteria, and prior treatment (if any) received by a given patient.

Objective: The introduction of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) - with varying degrees of efficacy for reducing annual relapse rate and disability progression - has considerably transformed the therapeutic landscape of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). We aim to develop rational evidence-based treatment recommendations and algorithms for the management of clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) and RRMS that conform to the healthcare system in a fast-developing economic country such as Qatar., Research Design and Methods: We conducted a systematic review using a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, PubMed, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (1 January 1990 through 30 September 2016). Additional searches of the American Academy of Neurology and European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis abstracts from 2012 through 2016 were performed, in addition to searches of the Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency websites to obtain relevant safety information on these DMTs., Results: For each of the DMTs, the mode of action, efficacy, safety and tolerability are briefly discussed. To facilitate the interpretation, the efficacy data of the pivotal phase III trials are expressed by their most clinically useful measure of therapeutic efficacy, the number needed to treat (NNT). In addition, an overview of head-to-head trials in RRMS is provided as well as a summary of the several different RRMS management strategies (lateral switching, escalation, induction, maintenance and combination therapy) and the potential role of each DMT. Finally, algorithms were developed for CIS, active and highly active or rapidly evolving RRMS and subsequent breakthrough disease or suboptimal treatment response while on DMTs. The benefit-to-risk profiles of the DMTs, taking into account patient preference, allowed the provision of rational and safe patient-tailored treatment algorithms., Conclusions: Recommendations and algorithms for the management of CIS and RRMS have been developed relevant to the healthcare system of this fast-developing economic country.