1. The Impact of Systematic Depression Screening in Primary Care on Depression Identification and Treatment in a Large Health Care System: A Cohort Study
- Author
-
Michael B. Rothberg, Kathryn A. Martinez, Isabel Janmey, Elizabeth R. Pfoh, Irene L. Katzan, and Amit Anand
- Subjects
Adult ,Pediatrics ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Referral ,01 natural sciences ,Clinical decision support system ,Cohort Studies ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Health care ,Internal Medicine ,Humans ,Medicine ,030212 general & internal medicine ,0101 mathematics ,Medical prescription ,Depression (differential diagnoses) ,Retrospective Studies ,Primary Health Care ,Depression ,business.industry ,010102 general mathematics ,Capsule Commentary ,Patient Health Questionnaire ,Population study ,business ,Delivery of Health Care ,Cohort study - Abstract
Unless implementation of systematic depression screening is associated with timely treatment, quality measures based on screening are unlikely to improve outcomes. To assess the impact of integrating systematic depression screening with clinical decision support on depression identification and treatment. Retrospective pre-post study. Adults with a primary care visit within a large integrated health system in 2016 were included. Adults diagnosed with depression in 2015 or prior to their initial primary care visit in 2016 were excluded. Initiation of systematic screening using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) which began in mid-2016. Depression diagnosis was based on ICD codes. Treatment was defined as (1) antidepressant prescription, (2) referral, or (3) evaluation by a behavioral health specialist. We used an adjusted linear regression model to identify whether the percentage of visits with a depression diagnosis was different before versus after implementation of systematic screening. An adjusted multilevel regression model was used to evaluate the association between screening and odds of treatment. Our study population included 259,411 patients. After implementation, 59% of patients underwent screening. Three percent scored as having moderate to severe depression. The rate of depression diagnosis increased by 1.2% immediately after systematic screening (from 1.7 to 2.9%). The percent of patients with diagnosed depression who received treatment within 90 days increased from 64% before to 69% after implementation (p
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF