Search

Background: Aortic root remodeling is one of the principal forms of valve-preserving root replacement. Its value has been questioned by some, whereas others have achieved excellent valve durability. The purpose of this review is to summarize the existing information to determine which factors may have contributed both to failures and to successes., Methods: Publications on root remodeling for aneurysm or dissection with tricuspid aortic valves with >15 patients were reviewed for specific details of preoperative and intraoperative management., Results: The series were very heterogeneous. Most operations were performed for root aneurysm, and 10 publications included type A dissection. Connective tissue disease was present in 22% of patients. Mean patient age was 52 years, and 5-year survival varied between 58% and 100%. Most series did not include an annuloplasty. Importantly, no details on quantitative assessment of valve configuration were specified in most series, especially those with suboptimal valve function and durability. The introduction of the effective height concept to control valve configuration was associated with improved results and more frequent correction of cusp prolapse. Late freedom from aortic regurgitation and freedom from reoperation are good in the larger series., Conclusions: Root remodeling can lead to excellent valve durability if quantitative intraoperative measurement of valve configuration is performed. The addition of an annuloplasty seems to improve aortic valve competence further, even though its effect on durability is not unequivocally proven. The long-term results of root remodeling are good, also in the second postoperative decade, and it is a valid form of valve-preserving root replacement., Competing Interests: Disclosures The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The aim of this study was to report the long-term results of the clover and edge-to-edge repair techniques for complex tricuspid regurgitation (TR)., Methods: This was a single-center observational study. A competing risks proportional-hazards regression model, using the Fine and Gray model, was performed to analyze the time to TR ≥2+, considering death as a competing risk., Results: A total of 145 consecutive patients (57% female) with severe or moderately severe TR secondary to leaflet prolapse or flail (115 patients), tethering (27 patients), or mixed (3 patients) lesions underwent clover (110 patients) or edge-to-edge repair(35 patients). The TR origin was degenerative in 75% of cases, posttraumatic in 8%, and secondary to dilated cardiomyopathy in 17%. Ring (64%) or suture (31%) annuloplasty was performed in 95% of patients. Concomitant procedures (mainly mitral surgery) were performed in 80% of cases. Hospital death was 5.5%. Follow-up was 98% complete, and median was 15 years (interquartile range, 14-17 years). The 16-year overall survival was 56% ± 5%. Previous cardiac surgery (hazard ratio [HR], 2.83; 95% CI, 1.15-6.93; P = .023) and right ventricular dysfunction (HR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.01-4.95; P = .046) were identified as predictors of death. The 16-year cumulative incidence function (CIF) of cardiac death with noncardiac death as a competing risk was 19.6%, and previous cardiac surgery (HR, 3.44; 95% CI, 1.23-9.65; P = .019) was detected as the only predictor of the event. At 16 years, the CIF of TR ≥2+ with death as a competing risk was 23.8%. In particular, TR ≥3+ was detected in 4 patients (3%)., Conclusions: When TR could not be treated by annuloplasty alone, concomitant leaflet repair with the clover or edge-to-edge technique effectively restored valve competence with very satisfactory long-term results and a low rate of moderate or greater TR recurrence., Competing Interests: Disclosures The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

We present a modified technique of Hemispherical Aortic Annuloplasty Reconstructive Technology (HAART) 200 annuloplasty ring implantation in bicuspid aortic valve morphology by external fixation of the looping sutures to avoid common complications associated with the original implantation technique. Preliminary results are promising and should be confirmed in subsequent multicentre studies., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Cusp prolapse is an important cause of aortic regurgitation (AR) in tricuspid aortic valves (TAVs) and can be caused by myxomatous degeneration or cusp fenestration. Long-term data for prolapse repair in TAVs are scarce. We analyzed the results of aortic valve repair in patients with TAV morphology and AR caused by prolapse and compared the results for cusp fenestration and myxomatous degeneration., Methods: Between October 2000 and December 2020, 237 patients (221 male; 15-83 years) underwent TAV repair for cusp prolapse. Prolapse was associated with fenestrations in 94 (group I) and myxomatous degeneration in 143 patients (group II). Fenestrations were closed using a pericardial patch (n = 75) or suture (n = 19). In myxomatous degeneration, prolapse was corrected by free margin plication (n = 132) or triangular resection (n = 11). Follow-up was 97% complete (cumulatively 1531, mean 6.5, median 5.8 years). Cardiac comorbidities were present in 111 patients (46.8%), and more frequent in group II (P = .003)., Results: Ten-year survival was better in group I (I: 84.5%; II: 72.4%; P = .037), and patients without cardiac comorbidities (89.2% vs 67.0%; P = .002). Ten-year freedom from reoperation (P = .778), moderate or greater AR (P = .070), and valve-related complications (P = .977) were similar in both groups. AR at discharge was the only significant predictor for reoperation (P = .042). The type of annuloplasty did not affect repair durability., Conclusions: Repair of cusp prolapse in TAVs with preserved root dimensions can be performed with acceptable durability, even in the presence of fenestrations., (Copyright © 2023 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aim: Although current guidelines recommend concomitant tricuspid annuloplasty for moderate or greater tricuspid regurgitation (TR) and/or dilated annulus, there remains significant variation in undertaking concomitant tricuspid valve surgery (TVA) across different centres. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of concomitant tricuspid valve surgery for patients with moderate or greater TR and/or dilated annulus at the time of mitral valve (MV) surgery., Method: A systematic review of the literature using six databases. Eligible studies include comparative studies on TVA concomitant with MV surgery versus MV surgery alone. A meta-analysis was performed on studies reporting outcomes of interest to quantify the effects of concomitant tricuspid ring annuloplasty., Results: Two randomised controlled trials and six cohort studies were included in the analysis. 1,941 patients were included in the analysis, of whom, 1,090 underwent concomitant TVA and 851 underwent MV surgery alone. Pooled analysis demonstrated that there was less progression of moderate/severe TR in the concomitant group (3.0% vs 9.6%; odds ratio [OR] 0.29; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.13-0.55; p=0.0001). There was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality (3.0% vs 3.8%; OR 0.79; 95% CI 0.47-1.34; p=0.38). The rate of permanent pacemaker implantation was higher in the concomitant group although this did not reach statistical significance (7.6% vs 5.3%; OR 1.30; 95% CI 0.85-1.98; p=0.23). Cardiopulmonary bypass was longer in the concomitant TVA group by 20 minutes (mean difference 13.9-26.0; p<0.00001)., Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that concomitant tricuspid ring annuloplasty at the time of MV surgery is associated with a significantly lower rate of TR progression without increasing the operative mortality. There is a trend towards a higher permanent pacemaker implantation rate although this did not reach statistical significance., (Crown Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Aortic valve replacement is the common treatment of choice for severe aortic valve insufficiency (AI). AI is often caused by aortic root dilatation which leads to valve incompetence despite structurally normal valve leaflets. For this condition, aortic repair surgery with ring annuloplasty is considered a potentially superior option. Despite the availability of different annuloplasty rings, no guidelines for the surgical procedure nor the choice of annuloplasty ring exist. In this review, we outline the surgical treatment using valve-preserving procedures as an alternative to conventional aortic valve replacement., (Published under Open Access CC-BY-NC-BD 4.0. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.)

Purpose of Review: This review addresses treatment options for moderate to severe tricuspid valve regurgitation and the importance of right ventricular function and the pulmonary circulation., Recent Findings: Several interventional treatment options for severe tricuspid regurgitation have been developed including transcatheter edge-to-edge repair, annuloplasty and valve replacement. So far, transcatheter edge-to-edge repair is most frequently used with procedural success rates of more than 95% and improvements in functional and quality of life parameters for up to 2 years. Right ventricular function as well as pulmonary artery pressure and resistance levels are important outcome predictors. Mean pulmonary artery pressure more than 30 mmHg, transpulmonary gradient more than 17 mmHg and right ventricular to pulmonary artery coupling ratio less than 0.406 indicate poor outcome., Summary: Despite the remarkable safety of interventional treatment of severe tricuspid regurgitation right ventricular dysfunction and abnormal pulmonary hemodynamics are important determinants of procedural success and clinical outcome.Complete hemodynamic work-up should be an integral part of prerepair assessment although validated data predicting outcome are limited., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: A recent multicenter trial showed a reduction in tricuspid regurgitation (TR) progression when tricuspid annuloplasty was performed at the time of surgery for degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR), but with a 14% permanent pacemaker (PPM) rate. We present real-world outcomes at a high-volume center for degenerative MR surgery with/without tricuspid annuloplasty., Methods: Patients undergoing first-time degenerative mitral surgery between 2011 and 2021 were identified (n = 1738). After excluding patients undergoing aortic, aortic valve, or tricuspid replacement procedures, patients were stratified into mitral surgery alone (n = 1068) vs mitral surgery plus tricuspid annuloplasty (n = 417). Outcomes, including operative mortality, new PPM implantation, postoperative length of stay, and risk-adjusted overall mortality, were compared., Results: Among 1485 patients in this study, 98% underwent mitral repair. Compared with concomitant tricuspid annuloplasty patients, those undergoing mitral surgery alone were 6 years younger and had lower median The Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality. Among concomitant tricuspid repair patients, 85% (355 of 417) had moderate or less preoperative TR, whereas 15% (61 of 417) had severe TR. Operative mortality was 1.4%. The incidence of new PPM implantation was 0.7% (7 of 1068) in the mitral only group and 5.5% (23 of 417) in the concomitant tricuspid group (P < .001). Although unadjusted cumulative survival was lower in the concomitant tricuspid group, after risk adjustment, concomitant tricuspid surgery was not associated with worse overall mortality (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.53-1.19; P = .27)., Conclusions: Concomitant tricuspid annuloplasty is safe, with no difference in mortality and a <6% PPM rate at a high-volume mitral center. These data provide real-world context for concomitant tricuspid annuloplasty., Competing Interests: Disclosures Alexander A. Brescia is an Associate Editor for Digital Media and Digital Scholarship for The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. Matthew A. Romano reports a relationship with Edwards that includes: Consulting or advisory. Gorav Ailawadi reports a relationship with Edwards that includes: Consulting or advisory; with Abbott that includes: Consulting or advisory; with Medtronic that includes: Consulting or advisory; with Philips that includes: Consulting or advisory; with Arthrex that includes: Consulting or advisory. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Concomitant tricuspid valve (TV) repair is a safe and effective procedure to protect against late moderate or greater tricuspid regurgitation (TR) after left-sided valve surgery, but studies regarding its late outcomes and recurrent TR are limited. This study aimed to reveal the late outcomes and explore the predictors of mortality and recurrent TR among patients who underwent concomitant TV repair with left-sided valve surgery., Methods and Results: This study included 645 patients (mean age, 69.7 years; 44% male) who underwent concomitant TV repair with left-sided valve surgery (mitral valve surgery in 594 cases, aortic valve surgery in 172 cases) from 2006-2020. Preoperative TR was grade 4, 3, and less than 2 in 85, 235, and 325 patients, respectively. The median follow-up period was 4.6 (IQR 1.7-7.8) years. The in-hospital or 30-day mortality was 1.7% (n = 11). Regarding long-term outcomes after TV repair, 90.3% and 80.8% achieved 5- and 10-year survival, respectively, while 96.1% and 88.8% achieved 5- and 10-year freedom from recurrent TR, respectively. The following were independent predictors of overall mortality on multivariate analysis in patients with preoperative TR grade ≥ 3: prior pacemaker implantation, preoperative renal dysfunction, diabetes mellitus and NYHA class ≥ 3. Also, suture annuloplasty and ring type of ring annuloplasty were not independent risk factors for recurrent TR, classified as grade ≥ 3., Conclusions: Concomitant TV repair with left-sided valve surgery had acceptable outcomes in terms of survival and TR durability. In patients with preoperative TR grade ≥ 3, preoperative patient status had negative impacts on prognosis., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery.)

Computed tomography (CT) is used as a valuable tool for device selection for interventional therapy in tricuspid regurgitation (TR). We aimed to evaluate predictors of TR reduction using CT and automated deep learning algorithms. Patients with severe to torrential TR and CTs prior to either percutaneous annuloplasty (PA) or tricuspid transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (T-TEER) were enrolled. CTs were analyzed using automated deep learning algorithms to assess tricuspid valve anatomy, right heart morphology, and function. Outcome parameters comprised post-interventional TR ≤ 1 and all-cause mortality. 84 patients with T-TEER (n = 32) or PA treatment (n = 52) were enrolled. Patients with a post-interventional TR ≤ 1 presented lower tenting heights and smaller tenting angles compared to patients with a TR > 1. Tenting height showed the best accuracy for post-interventional TR > 1 with an AUC of 0.756 (95% CI 0.560-0.951) in the T-TEER and 0.658 (95% CI 0.501-0.815) in the PA group, consistent with a suggested threshold of 6.8 mm and 9.2 mm, respectively. Patients with a post-interventional TR ≤ 1 exhibited a mortality of 4% and those with a TR > 1 of 12% during a follow-up of 331 ± 300 and 370 ± 265 days, respectively (p = 0.124). To conclude, tenting is associated with procedural outcomes and should be considered during screening for interventional TR therapy., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objectives: Both aortic root remodelling and aortic valve (AV) reimplantation have been used for valve-sparing root replacement in patients with aortic root aneurysm with or without aortic regurgitation. There is no clear evidence to support one technique over the another. This study aimed to compare remodelling with basal ring annuloplasty versus reimplantation on a multicentre level with the use of propensity-score matching., Methods: This was a retrospective international multicentre study of patients undergoing remodelling or reimplantation between 2010 and 2021. Twenty-three preoperative covariates (including root dimensions and valve characteristics) were used for propensity-score matching. Perioperative outcomes were analysed along with longer-term freedom from AV reoperation/reintervention and other major valve-related events., Results: Throughout the study period, 297 patients underwent remodelling and 281 had reimplantation. Using propensity-score matching, 112 pairs were selected and further compared. We did not find a statistically significant difference in perioperative outcomes between the matched groups. Patients after remodelling had significantly higher reintervention risk than after reimplantation over the median follow-up of 6 years (P = 0.016). The remodelling technique (P = 0.02), need for decalcification (P = 0.03) and degree of immediate postoperative AV regurgitation (P < 0.001) were defined as independent risk factors for later AV reintervention. After exclusion of patients with worse than mild AV regurgitation immediately after repair, both techniques functioned comparably (P = 0.089)., Conclusions: AV reimplantation was associated with better valve function in longer-term postoperatively than remodelling. If optimal immediate repair outcome was achieved, both techniques provided comparable AV function., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Tricuspid valve regurgitation, or TR, is a difficult-to-manage condition. In addition to EVOQUE, percutaneous annuloplasty, and surgical repair, the TriClip G4 system has been added to the interventional therapeutic choices for TR. Recently, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the use of the TriClip G4 device to treat patients with symptomatic, severe TR who have received optimal medication therapy but are at intermediate or higher risk of surgery. This review attempts to offer a thorough examination of the procedural features, learning curves, results of the device and compares the TriClip G4 system to other interventional therapies for TR. TriClip G4 has shown to have promising results in pivotal clinical trials, be cost-effective, and improve the quality of life of patients. Furthermore, it has its unique advantages against other conventional techniques and devices., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: We investigated long-term outcomes of bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) repair, with external annuloplasty, according to aorta phenotype., Methods: Between 2003 and 2020, all patients with BAV operated on for aortic insufficiency (AI) and/or aneurysm were included. Repairs included isolated AI repair with subvalvular with or without sinotubular junction (STJ) (single or double) annuloplasty, supracoronary aorta replacement (with or without hemiroot remodeling), and root remodeling with external subvalvular ring annuloplasty., Results: Among 343 patients operated, reparability rate was 81.3% (n = 279; age 46 ± 13.3 years). At 10 years (median follow-up: 3.42 years; interquartile range, 1.1, 5.8), survival was 93.9% (n = 8 deaths, similar to general population), cumulative incidence of reoperation was 6.2% (n = 10), AI grade >2 was 5.8% (n = 9), and grade >1 was 23.0% (n = 30). BAV repair stabilizing both the annulus and STJ with annuloplasty, compared with nonstabilized STJ repair (single annuloplasty), had lower incidence of reoperation (2.6% vs 22.5%, P = .0018) and AI grade >2 (1.2% vs 23.6%, P < .001) at 9 years. Initial commissural angle <160° was not a risk factor for reoperation, compared with angle ≥160° if symmetrical repair was achieved (2.7% and 4.1%, respectively, at 6 years, P = .85). Multivariable model showed that absence of STJ stabilization (odds ratio, 6.7; 95% confidence interval, 2.1-20, P = .001) increased recurrent AI, but not initial commissural angle <160° (odds ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 0.39-2.63, P = .98). Commissures adjusted symmetrically led to lower transvalvular gradient, compared with nonsymmetrical repair (8.7 mm Hg vs 10.2 mm Hg, P = .029)., Conclusions: BAV repair, tailored to aorta phenotype, is associated with excellent durable outcomes if both annulus and STJ are reduced and stabilized with external ring annuloplasty. Commissural angle <160° is not associated with reoperation if symmetrical repair is achieved., (Copyright © 2022 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: In a recent trial, tricuspid annuloplasty (TA) during mitral valve surgery (MVS) for degenerative mitral regurgitation and moderate or less tricuspid regurgitation (TR) reduced the composite rate of death, reoperation for TR, or TR progression at 2 years. However, this benefit was counterbalanced by an increase in implantation of permanent pacemakers (PPMs). In this study, we analyzed the timing, indications, and risk factors for these implantations., Methods: We randomized 401 patients (MVS alone = 203; MVS + TA = 198). Potential risk factors for PPMs were assessed using multivariable time-to-event models with death and PPM implantation for heart failure indications as competing risks., Results: A PPM was implanted in 36 patients (9.6; 95% CI, 6.8-13.0) within 2 years of randomization, with 30/187 (16.0%) in the MVS + TA and 6/188 (3.2%) in the MVS groups (rate ratio, 5.08; 95% CI, 2.16-11.94; P < .001). Most (29/36; 80.6%) implantations occurred within 30 days postoperatively. Independent risk factors for PPM implantation within 2 years were TA (hazard ratio [HR], 5.94; 95% CI, 2.27-15.53; P < .001), increasing age (5 years, HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.01-1.52; P = .04), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF; HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.92-0.99; P = .02). In the subset of TA recipients (n = 197), age (5 years, HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.00-1.10; P = .04) and LVEF (HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.91-0.99; P = .01) were associated with PPM within 2 years., Conclusions: Concomitant TA, age, and baseline LVEF were risk factors for PPM implantation in patients who underwent MVS for degenerative mitral regurgitation. Although TA was effective in preventing progression of TR, innovation is needed to identify ways to decrease PPM implantation rates., (Copyright © 2022 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Background: This study was performed to determine cusp causes of aortic regurgitation in patients with tricuspid aortic valves without significant aortic dilatation and define cusp pathologies amenable to surgical repair (aortic valve repair [AVr]) versus aortic valve replacement., Methods and Results: We retrospectively reviewed surgical reports of consecutive adults with tricuspid aortic valves undergoing surgery for clinically significant aortic regurgitation within a prospective registry from January 2005 to September 2019. Valvular mechanisms were determined by systematic in vivo intraoperative quantification methods. Of 516 patients, 287 (56%) underwent repair (AVr; mean±SD age, 59.9±12.4 years; 81% men) and 229 (44%) underwent replacement (aortic valve replacement; mean±SD age, 62.8±13.8 years [ P =0.01 compared to AVr]; 67% men). A single valvular mechanism was present in 454 patients (88%), with cusp prolapse (46%), retraction (24%), and perforation (18%) being the most common. Prolapse involved the right cusp in 86% of cases and was more frequent in men ( P <0.001). Two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography accuracy for predicting mechanisms was 73% to 82% for the right cusp, 55% to 61% for the noncoronary cusp, and 0% for the left-coronary cusp. Cusp prolapse, younger age, and larger patient size were associated with successful AVr (all P <0.03), whereas retraction, perforation, older age, and concomitant mitral repair were associated with aortic valve replacement (all P <0.03)., Conclusions: Right cusp prolapse is the most frequent single valvular mechanism in patients with tricuspid aortic valve aortic regurgitation, followed by cusp retraction and perforation. The accuracy of 2-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography is limited for left and noncoronary cusp mechanistic assessment. Prolapse is associated with successful AVr, whereas retraction and perforation are associated with aortic valve replacement. With systematic intraoperative quantification methods and current surgical techniques, more than half of tricuspid aortic valve aortic regurgitation cases may be successfully repaired.

Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr Barbieri declares research grant support from Abbott Laboratories and Boston Scientific, speaker honoraria from Edwards Lifesciences, and consulting fees from Boston Scientific. Dr Dreger reports research support from Abbott Laboratories and speaker honoraria from Abbott Laboratories and Edwards Lifesciences. The other authors report no conflicts.

Tricuspid valve repair (TVR) combined with mitral valve surgery (MVS) has been a controversial issue. It is not clear whether the combined surgery has any influence on the occurrence of postoperative complications. The aim of this study was to compare the occurrence of complications including wound infection, wound bleeding, and mortality after MVS combined with or without TVR. By meta-analysis, a total of 1576 papers were collected from 3 databases, and 7 of them were included. We provided the necessary data of 7 included studies such as the authors, publication date, country, surgical approach and case number, patient age, and so on. Statistical analysis was carried out with RevMan 5.3 software. We found that patients with heart failure accepting MVS combined with or without TVR, performed no statistically significant difference in postoperative wound infection (OR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.29, 2.62; P = 0.81), wound bleeding (OR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.3, 1.48; P = 0.39), and mortality (OR: 1.05; 95% CI: 0.42, 2.61; P = 0.92). In conclusion, current evidence indicated that the combined surgery had no additional risk of postoperative complications, and might be an effective alternative surgical approach to mitral valve diseases accompany with tricuspid regurgitation. However, for the limited case size, it was required to support the findings with a large number of cases in further studies., (© 2024 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: This study evaluated midterm outcomes of a 3-pronged algorithm for bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) repair. Valve-sparing root reimplantation (VSRR) was performed for patients with aortic root dilatation. In those without a root aneurysm, external subannular ring (ESAR) was performed for annuli ≥28 mm and subcommissural annuloplasty (SCA) for annuli <28 mm., Methods: This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data of 242 patients undergoing primary BAV repair from April 29, 2004, to March 1, 2023, at a single institution. Primary end points were mortality, structural valve degeneration (SVD), which was defined as a composite of more than moderate aortic insufficiency or severe aortic stenosis, and reintervention., Results: The algorithm was used to treat 201 patients; of these, 130 underwent VSRR, 35 had ESAR, and 36 underwent SCA. Most were men with mean age of 43.8 years (SD, 12.0 years), which was similar between groups. Preoperative aortic insufficiency more than moderate was more common for ESAR compared with VSRR and SCA (74.3% vs 37.7% vs 44.4%, P < .001). At 30 days, mortality was 0.8% (n = 1) for VSRR and 0% for ESAR and SCA. At 6 years, overall Kaplan-Meier survival was 98.9% (95% CI, 97.3%-100%), with no differences between groups (P = .5). The cumulative incidence of SVD was 4.7% (95% CI, 0.1%-9.2%) for VSRR, 6.4% (95% CI, 0%-14.6%) for ESAR, and 0% for SCA (P = .4). Similarly, the cumulative incidence of reintervention with all-cause mortality as a competing risk was 2.2% (95% CI, 0.4%-6.9%), 6.1% (95% CI, 1%-17.9%), and 0% for VSRR, ESAR, and SCA, respectively (P = .506)., Conclusions: A 3-pronged algorithmic approach to BAV repair results in excellent survival and freedom from reoperation at 6 years., (Copyright © 2024 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To examine the early to mid-term clinical outcomes of aortic valve repair in patients with bicuspid aortic insufficiency. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study. The clinical data of 124 patients with BAV insufficiency who underwent aortic valve repair from January 2017 to June 2023 in the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery at Fuwai Hospital were analyzed retrospectively. There were 117 males and 7 females with an age of (38.1±12.7) years (range: 14 to 65 years). Depending on whether the aortic sinus was replaced or not, surgical approaches were divided into valve sparing root replacement (reimplantation, remodeling, modified remodeling) and isolated aortic valve repair (annuloplasty, isolated aortic valve leaflet repair). Perioperative and follow-up data were collected. Kaplan-Meier method was used to plot the curves of survival rate, free recurrence rate of massive aortic valve insufficiency and free re-operation rate, and Log-rank test was used for comparison between groups. Results: Among the surgeries, there were 47 cases of reimplantation, 8 cases of remodeling, 8 cases of modified remodeling, 48 cases of aortic annuloplasty (external annuloplasty in 22 cases, CV-0 annuloplasty in 26 cases), and 13 cases of isolated leaflet repair. Leaflet plication was the most used leaflet repair technique, used in 103 patients. The cardiopulmonary bypass time was (133.7±56.9) minutes (range: 48 to 461 minutes), and aortic cross-clamp time was (103.8±47.8) minutes (range: 25 to 306 minutes), with no surgical mortality. All patients underwent outpatient or telephone follow-up. The cumulative follow-up time was 340.3 person-years and the mean follow-up time was ( M (IQR)) 34.0 (25.5) months (range: 3 to 76 months). The 5-year survival rate was 98.4%, the 5-year freedom from significant insufficiency rate was 93.4% and the 5-year freedom from aortic valve reoperation rate was 95.6%. The subgroup analysis revealed a significantly better freedom from the significant insufficiency rate in the aortic valve annular reduction group compared to the non-reduction group ( P <0.01). Conclusions: Aortic valve repair in patients with bicuspid aortic insufficiency could obtain steady early to mid-term outcomes. Aortic annuloplasty can reduce the risk of recurrent aortic valve insufficiency in patients undergoing aortic repair.

Objectives: Recurrence of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) after tricuspid annuloplasty can occur in cases where a dilated right ventricle exists and subsequent leaflet tethering follows. We previously reported a new technique of the right ventricular papillary muscle approximation (RV-PMA) for functional TR associated with leaflet tethering. The objective of this study is to elucidate the mid-term outcomes and evaluate the durability of RV-PMA., Methods: Between January 2014 and March 2023, we applied RV-PMA in 20 patients of advanced functional TR with severe leaflet tethering. The indication of the technique was severe TR with leaflet tethering height >8 mm, and/or a right ventricular end-diastolic diameter >45 mm. The patients were followed up with echocardiography before discharge and at annual interval thereafter., Results: There was no perioperative mortality. In the echocardiography performed before discharge, TR was decreased to mild or less in 85%, and a significant improvement in right ventricular end-diastolic diameter and tethering height were achieved (53-45 mm and 11.1-4.4 mm, respectively). Furthermore, during the median 3-year follow-up period, TR was kept controlled mild or less in 80% of the cases., Conclusions: RV-PMA is considered to be a safe, effective and durable technique as an additional approach for tricuspid annuloplasty., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Stabilizing the aorto-ventricular junction is integral in aortic valve repair. We report our technique of internal circular suture annuloplasty. We used a continuous horizontal mattress suture of a single thick expanded polytetrafluoroethylene suture (CV-3). We put 4 stitches per sinus, so the suture was below the cusp attachment line at the nadirs and passed through the interleaflet triangle at the upper aorto-ventricular junction level. The suture was reinforced with pericardial pledgets on both sides of each commissure. We used this technique in 12 patients. The diameter of aorto-ventricular junction was reduced from 25 ± 2 mm to 22 ± 1 mm (n = 11) and was 22 ± 1 mm at the latest follow-up (4-74 months, median 41, n = 10). In 2 patients with large aorto-ventricular junction (27 mm or more), expected annular reduction was not achieved. Our modified technique is simple and seems durable. It may be useful for mild annular dilatation., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery.)

In aortic valve repair, whilst performing a Yacoub remodelling operation, the external annuloplasty of the aortic ring plays a very important role. Here we present an adjustable external Dacron annuloplasty as an additional tool, in very selected cases, that can help surgeons to further improve their immediate results thus influencing the long-term ones., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery.)

The Y-incision technique introduced by Dr. Bo Yang in 2021 is a very innovative technique that can enlarge the aortic annulus by two or more sizes without violating the left atrium or mitral valve. However, we encountered a case in which the left coronary artery ostium was located close to the left-non commissure. Therefore, we considered it would be dangerous to expand the incision to the left coronary annulus. We therefore devised a new technique that enlarges only the noncoronary annulus in an "L" fashion instead of a "Y" fashion. In performing this surgery, preoperative three-dimensional images were useful for understanding the anatomy when planning the aortic annular enlargement procedure. The L-incision technique can be a useful alternative method of aortic annulus enlargement.

The development of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a common complication of mitral valve disease. Although severe TR is usually operated on at the same time of mitral valve surgery (MVS), controversies remain regarding whether mild to moderate TR patients should be operated. Concomitant tricuspid valve repair with MVS for mild-moderate TR patients. Electronic databases were searched from inception to November 20, 2022 to include any observational or randomized controlled trials (RCT) that compare concomitant tricuspid repair with MVS versus MVS alone. Mantel-Haenszel method was used to pool study estimates and calculate odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). A total of 9813 patients from 25 studies were included. Regarding primary outcomes, concomitant repair group had significantly lower 30 days mortality (OR: 0.66; 95% CI 0.45 to 0.96), all-cause mortality-based on RCTs- (OR: 0.40; 95% CI 0.22 to 0.71), cardiovascular mortality (OR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.33 to 0.86) and heart failure hospitalizations (OR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.26 to 0.63). However, was associated with higher permanent pacemaker implantation rates (OR: 2.09; 95% CI: 1.45 to 3.00). There were no significant differences in terms of secondary outcomes: tricuspid valve reinterventions, stroke and acute kidney injury. Furthermore, repair group showed lower risk for TR progression degrees (OR 0.08; 95% CI 0.05 to 0.16) and decreased mean of TR progression (MD -1.85; 95% CI -1.92 to -1.77). Concomitant tricuspid valve repair in mild or moderate TR at time of MVS appears to reduce not only 30 days but also long-term all-cause and cardiovascular mortality weighed against the increased risk of pacemaker implantation.

Objectives: The Hemispherical Aortic Annuloplasty Reconstructive Technology (HAART) ring is a rigid, internal and geometric device. The objective of this article is to assess the mid-term outcomes of aortic valve repair (AVr) using this prosthesis., Methods: A prospectively maintained database was used to obtain outcomes for adult patients undergoing AVr using the HAART ring between September 2017 and June 2023. All aortic patients at our institution undergo life-long surveillance with regular assessment and valve imaging., Results: Seventy-one patients underwent AVr using the HAART device: 53 had a trileaflet valve and 18 a bicuspid valve. The median age was 54 years, and most were male (79%). Many required concomitant intervention: 46% had a root procedure and 77% an arch repair. There were no in-hospital deaths, and the median postoperative stay was 5 days. At a mean follow-up of 3.9 (±1.1) years, freedom from reoperation was 94%. Late imaging demonstrated: zero trace (25%), 1+ (54%), 2+ (15%) and 4+ (6%) aortic insufficiency (AI). Eleven patients have ≥moderate AI under surveillance, all of whom have a trileaflet valve (21% of trileaflet patients). Four patients required reoperation: 3 for ring dehiscence and 1 for endocarditis., Conclusions: Although early results using the HAART device are encouraging, mid-term results raise concern as 21% of trileaflet patients developed recurrent ≥moderate AI by 4 years post-repair. We experienced 3 incidences of ring dehiscence requiring reoperation. Based on this, we recommend caution using the sub-annular approach for stabilization in patients with trileaflet aortic valves. Long-term results are needed to assess outcomes against established techniques., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Tricuspid repair is recommended for significant functional tricuspid regurgitation (FTR) or tricuspid annulus (TA) dilation, based on TA >40 mm or >21 mm/m². The concordance between both TA dimensions related to the patient's body size has not been investigated. Patients who underwent rigid ring tricuspid annuloplasty for FTR between 2009 and 2017 were included. Assuming equality between both TA diameter criteria, patients were divided per body surface area (BSA): group 1 = BSA ≤1.9 m² and group 2 = BSA >1.9 m². The primary outcome was TR recurrence at 5 years. Tricuspid annuloplasty was performed in 186 patients (group 1: 130 patients [69.9%]; group 2: 56 patients [30.1%]). Group 1 comprised more female (70.8% to 23.2%, p <0.001) and older patients (77.1 ± 9.3 years; 74.2 ± 8.2 years, p = 0.048). Group 1 had a smaller absolute TA diameter (group 1: 45.3 ± 5.2 mm; group 2: 48.2 ± 5.6 mm, p <0.001), whereas the indexed TA size was inversely higher (group 1: 26.3 ± 3.4 mm/m²; group 2: 24.2 ± 2.7 mm/m², p <0.001). The tenting height was comparable (group 1: 7.8 ± 3.0 mm; group 2: 8.0 ± 2.7 mm, p = 0.714). The median ring size was 30 (interquartile range 28 to 32) and 32 (interquartile range 30 to 34) for groups 1 and 2, respectively (p <0.001). TR recurrence at 5 years was noticed in 20.2% and 6.5% of group 1 and 2 (p = 0.035). Indexed TA diameter (hazard ratio 1.43, 95% confidence interval 1.10 to 1.87, p = 0.008) and tenting height (hazard ratio 5.52, 95% confidence interval 1.87 to 14.57, p = 0.002) were independent predictors of TR recurrence. In conclusion, when the absolute TA diameter is used as the primary criterion, smaller patients are at a higher risk for TR recurrence by having a proportionally larger TA at the time of repair. An individualized approach guided by patient's body size might be more appropriate to indicate FTR correction to adjust for the annuloplasty sizing method., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have no competing interests to declare., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aortic annuloplasty has been clearly demonstrated to have a protective influence in aortic valve repair. Over the past 20 years, different annuloplasty concepts have been proposed by different groups. However, the most appropriate approach to enable long-term annular stability remains highly controversial. The aim of this article is to give a general overview of all types of aortic annuloplasty, particularly focusing on the use of an external Teflon ring, as proposed by our group. In this technique, external root dissection is performed in the same fashion as for reimplantation; the only difference is that it is necessary to go below the coronary ostia take-off. A series of pledgeted sutures (usually between 6 and 9 sutures) are placed at the level of the virtual basal ring. The external ring is made using a Teflon strip with a length of 8 to 9 cm, to reduce the annulus to a diameter of between 21 and 23 mm. The sub-annular sutures are then passed at the appropriate level through the Teflon strip and the strip is parachuted outside the aortic root base, passing under the coronary ostia. The two ends of the Teflon strip are tied at the level of the non-coronary sinus. Aortic annuloplasty is a crucial step to improve valve competence and stabilization. While several techniques offer good mid- to long-term results, annuloplasty with an external Teflon ring appears to be a simple and effective alternative to guarantee stable root diameters. Longer follow-up studies are needed to confirm the mid- to long-term results.

Objective: Existing replacement options for the aortic valve have significant drawbacks, especially in children. A geometric annuloplasty ring can help to achieve consistently successful aortic valve repair, but only limited experience with use of this device has been reported in pediatric and congenital heart disease patients., Methods: All pediatric and adult congenital patients at our institution who underwent aortic valve repair with placement of a geometric annuloplasty ring were reviewed. The study period spanned from July 2018 to April 2022. Hemodynamic outcomes were evaluated using transthoracic echocardiography., Results: The study included 36 subjects. The median age was 17.4 years (range, 8-30 years). Twenty-one subjects were younger than age 18 years. The most common primary diagnoses were neoaortic valve insufficiency or neoaortic root dilation, and congenital aortic stenosis with bicuspid or functionally unicuspid aortic valve. Of the 34 subjects with procedural success, 31 (91%) had use of additional valve repair techniques and 26 (76%) had an additional concomitant procedure performed. Operative mortality was 0% (0/33), and major complication rate was 6% (2/33). The median follow-up time was 1.9 years (maximum, 3.8 years). The mean grade of aortic insufficiency was signific antly reduced after repair, with no change in mean gradients. Freedom from reoperation over the follow-up period was 97% (33/34), and freedom from ≥3+ recurrent aortic insufficiency was 94% (32/34)., Conclusions: A geometric annuloplasty ring can be used to help achieve consistently successful aortic valve repair with excellent perioperative and follow-up outcomes, even in pediatric and complex congenital heart disease patients., (Copyright © 2022 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of tricuspid annuloplasty with/without additional edge-to-edge plications in patients with functional tricuspid regurgitation (TR) and to clarify the impact of tethering on surgical outcomes., Methods: This retrospective observational study included patients with moderate or greater functional TR who underwent initial tricuspid valve repair between January 2008 and December 2021. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on whether they had tethering (preoperative tethering area ≥0.75 cm2). All patients underwent annuloplasty, and edge-to-edge plications were added at the regurgitant leakage site identified by saline tests. The surgical outcomes of each group and the effect of tethering on recurrent moderate or greater TR were evaluated., Results: One hundred and thirty-three patients were included in this study. During the follow-up period of 55.3 (standard deviation: 44.9) months, the 5-year survival rates were 78.4% in patients without tethering and 76.1% in patients with tethering (P = 0.78). The 5-year cumulative incidence rates of readmission for heart failure and recurrent TR were 10.8% and 1.3% in patients without tethering and 23.0% and 29.5% in patients with tethering, respectively (P = 0.12 and <0.001). Multivariable analyses revealed that the preoperative and predischarge tethering areas predicted recurrent TR. A large tethering area remained postoperatively in patients with tethering., Conclusions: In patients without tethering, annuloplasty and additional edge-to-edge plications are effective in avoiding recurrent TR with satisfactory midterm clinical outcomes. However, in patients with tethering, these procedures resulted in residual tethering, which could be leading to recurrent TR., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Disclosures Drs Lee and Lam are consultants for Huihe Medical Technology.

Objectives: The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the long-term results of root remodelling with tricuspid aortic valves and the effects of concomitant cusp repair and annuloplasty., Methods: Between October 1995 and December 2021, 684 patients with root aneurysm and regurgitant tricuspid valves were treated by root remodelling. The mean age was 56.5 [standard deviation (SD): 14] years, and 538 (77.6%) were male. Relevant aortic regurgitation was present in 68.3%. Concomitant procedures were performed in 374 patients. The long-term results were analysed. The mean follow-up of 7.2 (SD: 5.3) years (median 6.6 years); it was 95% complete (4934.4 patient-years)., Results: Cusp prolapse was repaired in 83%, and an annuloplasty was added in 353 instances (51.6%). Hospital mortality was 2.3%, and survival was 81.7% (SD: 1.2) and 55.7% (SD: 5.8) at 10 and 20 years; age and measurement of effective height were independent predictors for death. Freedom from Aortic insufficiency (AI) II was 90.5 (SD: 1.9) at 10 years and 76.7 (SD: 4.5) at 20 years. Cusp repair of all cusps showed a lower freedom from recurrent AI ≥II at 10 years (P < 0.001). Suture annuloplasty showed a lower freedom from recurrent AI II at 10 years (P = 0.07). Freedom from reoperation was 95.5 (SD: 1.1) and 92.8 (SD: 2.8) at 10 and 20 years. The addition of an annuloplasty showed no difference (P = 0.236). Cusp repair had no effect on valve durability (P = 0.390)., Conclusions: Root remodelling leads to good long-term stability. The addition of cusp repair improves the valve stability over time. The addition of suture annuloplasty improves early valve competency; it showed no effect on freedom from reoperation up to 10 years., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: For patients with isolated aortic regurgitation, a double sub- and supravalvular annuloplasty has been shown to reduce recurrent aortic regurgitation after aortic valve repair compared with a single subvalvular annuloplasty. The objective of this study was to compare the geometrical and dynamic properties of single- and double-ring annuloplasties in an in vitro model., Methods: Eighteen aortic roots from 80 kg pigs were randomized into a control, single-ring and double-ring group. Experiments were conducted in a pulsatile in vitro model. Hydrodynamics, radial force measurements at annular and sinotubular level and 2D echographic imaging were obtained., Results: Both the single- and double-ring annuloplasties downsized the aortic annulus and sinotubular junction (STJ) significantly and increased the coaptation height. The double-ring annuloplasty showed an additional significant increase in coaptation height compared with the single ring [8.5 (0.9)-9.8 (0.8) mm, P < 0.01]. The single-ring annuloplasty reduced radial forces at both levels, whereas the double-ring annuloplasty showed the greatest force reduction of the STJ., Conclusions: By treating the whole functional aortic annulus, encompassing both the aortic annulus and the STJ, a greater force reduction is observed. A subvalvular annuloplasty alone is efficient in reducing aortic annulus diameter and increasing coaptation height, however, by treating the STJ as well, an additional effect is observed on coaptation height, creating a more efficient stabilization. Reduction of annular force-distensibility ratio with the double-ring annuloplasty compared with the native controls indicates a sustained stabilizing effect., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Objective: About half of tricuspid valves (TVs) have 2 posterior leaflets, and the fibrous tissue of the tricuspid annulus is poor. Considering the anatomy and histology of the TV, we devised a secure ring annuloplasty technique. We herein report the outcomes of our continuous wrapping suture annuloplasty technique using a flexible total ring., Methods: We used a Tailor™ ring (Abbott, Chicago, IL, USA) as a full ring. The mark on the left side of the ring was fixed to the anteroseptal commissure, and the midpoint of the ring's markers was fixed at the center of the septal leaflet annulus. Using a continuous suture, all stitches were passed around the annuloplasty ring without penetration. One suture from the anteroseptal commissure ran toward the left side and another from the midpoint of the septal leaflet annulus ran toward the right, leading to annuloplasty without TV deformation., Results: Eighty patients underwent TV repair with this technique. The tricuspid regurgitation (TR) score in all patients improved from 1.9 ± 0.7 to 0.8 ± 0.4 ( P < 0.001) at 3 years postoperatively. The TR score of TVs with 2 posterior leaflets also improved from 1.9 ± 0.7 to 0.6 ± 0.4 after the operation and was unchanged during follow-up. The median follow-up period was 1.3 (0.5 to 2.0) years, and no patients required TV reoperation. The 3-year survival rate was 93%, and the 3-year rate of freedom from pacemaker implantation was 95%., Conclusions: The continuous wrapping suture technique using a flexible total ring is a useful procedure without TV deformation even when 2 posterior leaflets are present.

Objectives: The objectives were to analyze the long-term outcomes of tricuspid aortic valve repair for isolated severe aortic regurgitation and the impact of different annuloplasty techniques., Methods: The study cohort consists of 127 consecutive patients who received aortic valve repair for isolated severe aortic regurgitation in the tricuspid aortic valve between 1996 and 2019 in our institution. Exclusion criteria were aorta dilatation (≥45 mm), connective tissue disease, active endocarditis, type A dissection, and rheumatic disease. Mean age of patients was 55.6 ± 16 years, and 80% were male. Median follow-up was 6.4 years. Time-to-event analysis was performed, as well as risk of death, reoperation, and aortic regurgitation recurrence., Results: Cusp repair was performed in 117 patients (92%), and annuloplasty was performed in 126 patients (99%) with Cabrol stitch (73%), reimplantation technique (19.7%), or ring annuloplasty (6.3%). There was no hospital mortality. At 10 and 14 years, overall survival was 81% ± 5% and 71% ± 6%, respectively, and freedom from reoperation was 80% ± 5% and 73% ± 6%, respectively. Age and left coronary cusp repair were independent predictors of reoperation. Freedom from recurrent severe aortic regurgitation (>2+) was 73% ± 5% and 66% ± 7% at 10 and 12 years, respectively. Age, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, and patch repair were independent predictors of recurrent aortic regurgitation. Type of annuloplasty had no impact on survival or reoperation., Conclusions: Aortic valve repair for isolated severe aortic regurgitation in the tricuspid aortic valve is a safe procedure, and durability at 14 years is acceptable. In this study, the annuloplasty technique did not influence repair durability as was found in bicuspid aortic valve repair or aortic valve-sparing surgery. Severity of cusp pathology seems to be the main determinant of repair durability., (Copyright © 2021 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Surgical edge-to-edge repair has been suggested for tricuspid regurgitation (TR) with complex tricuspid valve (TV) pathologies. Nevertheless, the impact of concomitant TAP has not been well established. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of tricuspid edge-to-edge repair according to the implementation of concomitant TAP., Methods: A total of 264 patients who underwent tricuspid edge-to-edge repair between January 2001 and December 2020 were enrolled in the study, and 23 patients who had undergone previous TV repair were excluded. The remaining 241 patients were categorized into two groups: TAP (n = 190) and non-TAP (n = 51). Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to adjust the baseline differences between the two groups., Results: Early mortality and morbidity did not differ between the two groups. The mean follow-up duration was 111.5 ± 72.4 months. IPTW-adjusted survival analysis did not reveal a difference between the two groups in late significant tricuspid stenosis (trans-tricuspid pressure gradient ≥5 mmHg) and TV reoperations. However, freedom from overall mortality and late severe TR were significantly higher in the TAP group (p = 0.033 and 0.006, respectively). The sensitivity analysis, including propensity score matching, showed consistent results., Conclusion: The long-term outcomes of surgical tricuspid edge-to-edge repair were better when performed with concomitant TAP., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have nothing to disclose regarding commercial support. No potential conflicts exist. In addition, no funding was provided for this study., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Aortic valve repair (AVr) aims to preserve the native aortic leaflets and restore normal valve function. In doing so, AVr is a more technically challenging approach than traditional aortic valve replacement. Some of the complexity of repair techniques can be attributed to the unique structure of the functional aortic annulus (FAA), which, unlike the well-defined mitral annulus, is comprised of virtual and functional components. Though stabilizing the ventriculo-aortic junction (VAJ), a component of the FAA, is considered beneficial for patients with chronic aortic insufficiency (AI), the ideal AVr technique remains a subject of much debate. The existing AVr techniques do not completely stabilize the VAJ which may increase susceptibility to recurrent AI due to VAJ dilation. An emerging new technique showing promise for the treatment of both isolated and complex AI is AVr using HAART 300 TM geometric annuloplasty ring (GAR). The GAR is implanted below the valve leaflets in the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT), providing stability and creating a neo-annulus. As with other AVr subtypes, this procedure has a learning curve. There are unique surgical and echocardiographic aspects of AVr with GAR, including the appearance of the LVOT, the aortic valve leaflets, and their motion which cardiac anesthesiologists and echocardiographers must be familiar with. In this work, using an eight-patient echocardiographic case series, we provide an overview of this novel AVr technique, including some unique aspects of device sizing, patient selection, expected post-repair echocardiographic features, and a review of outcomes data., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest None., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This study was undertaken to analyse outcomes of aortic valve repair using additional material and compare the results to those of cusp repair without the use of the pericardial patch., Methods: All consecutive patients aged over 16 who underwent aortic valve repair with external ring annuloplasty for isolated aortic insufficiency, aortic insufficiency and tubular aortic aneurysm or aortic root aneurysm between May 2003 and November 2019 were included in a cohort study. Data were collected and analysed from the AVIATOR registry (AorticValve repair InternATiOnal Registry). Propensity score framework analysis (inverse probability of treatment weighting) was used to compare outcomes of the groups while controlling for confounders., Results: During the 16-year study period, 618 patients underwent aortic valve repair. Eight-year survival rate was 92% in the patch group and 90.2% in the no patch group without significant differences [P = 0.957 inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) weighted]. Early valve-related reoperation was more frequent in the patch group as compared to the no patch group (6% vs 1%, P < 0.001 IPTW weighted), the freedom from aortic valve-related reintervention and from structural valve deterioration at 8 years was not significantly different between the patch and no patch groups (93.7% vs 94%, P = 0.968 IPTW weighted; and 99.3% vs 96.7%, P = 0.964 IPTW weighted)., Conclusions: Although a higher rate of early reintervention was observed, aortic valve repair using the pericardial patch, in a standardized approach using external annuloplasty, with effective coaptation height of at least 9 mm, was not associated with an increase in mid-term aortic valve-related reoperation or structural valve deterioration as compared to valve repair without the pericardial patch., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Significant functional tricuspid regurgitation (TR) should be corrected in patients undergoing surgery for left-sided valvular diseases. We hypothesized that ring type may affect outcomes in tricuspid annuloplasty. Herein, we report our experience with three-dimensional semi-rigid rings compared to open simple-band annuloplasty., Methods: This is a retrospective study that included all patients who underwent tricuspid annuloplasty concomitant to left-sided valvular surgery. The study's main outcome measure was long-term recurrent TR probability., Results: Of the 781 study patients, 611 (78%) underwent annuloplasty using flexible band and 170 (22%) underwent rigid ring implantation. Early mortality did not differ significantly between the rigid and flexible groups (4.4% vs 4.1%, P = 1.000). Long-term mortality was similar between the groups [hazard ratio (HR) 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69-1.36, P = 0.847]. At a mean follow-up of 62 (50) months, freedom from TR grade 3+/4+ was 96.4% and 96.7% in the rigid and flexible groups, respectively (HR 1.41, 95% CI 0.55-3.61, P = 0.476). Furthermore, 2.4% of the rigid and 1.3% of the flexible groups required reoperation (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.21-4.82, P = 0.988). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that rheumatic valve aetiology (HR 1.92, CI 1.04-2.98, P = 0.042) and mitral stenosis (HR 1.44, CI 1.01-2.2, P = 0.044) were predictors for recurrent TR (3+/4+). Ring type was not associated with recurrence (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.3-2.47, P = 0.787)., Conclusions: Open bands performed at least as well as three-dimensional rings. Our results suggest that late clinical results of tricuspid annuloplasty depend on left-sided pathology and patient factors and less on the type of ring used., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Root reimplantation has been the favoured approach for patients with heritable aortic disorder requiring valve-sparring root replacement. In the past few years, root remodelling with annuloplasty has emerged as an alternative to root reimplantation in the general population. The aim of this study was to examine the late outcomes of patients with heritable aortic disorder undergoing valve-sparring root replacement and compare different techniques., Methods: Using the AVIATOR registry (Aortic Valve Insufficiency and ascending aorta Aneurysm InternATiOnal Registry), data were collected from 5 North American and European centres. Patients were divided into 4 groups according to the technique of valve-sparing used (root reimplantation, root remodelling with ring annuloplasty, root remodelling with suture annuloplasty and root remodelling alone). The primary endpoints were freedom from aortic regurgitation (AR) ≥2 and freedom from reintervention on the aortic valve. Secondary endpoints were survival and changes in annular dimensions over time., Results: A total of 237 patients were included in the study (reimplantation = 100, remodelling + ring annuloplasty = 76, remodelling + suture annuloplasty = 34, remodelling alone = 27). The majority of patients had Marfan syndrome (83%). Preoperative AR ≥2 was present in 41% of the patients. Operative mortality was 0.4% (n = 1). No differences were found between techniques in terms of postoperative AR ≥2 (P = 0.58), reintervention (P = 0.52) and survival (P = 0.59). Changes in aortic annulus dimension were significantly different at 10 years (P < 0.05), a difference that started to emerge 4 years after surgery., Conclusions: Overall, valve-sparring root replacement is a safe and durable procedure in patients with heritable aortic disorder. Nevertheless, root remodelling alone is associated with late annular dilatation. The addition of an annuloplasty, however, results in similar freedom from AR, reintervention, survival and changes in annulus size compared to reimplantation., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Background: Several tricuspid annuloplasty (TA) techniques are used for concomitant repair of functional tricuspid regurgitation (TR). This study compared the midterm clinical and valvular outcome among 3 annuloplasty techniques., Methods: TA was performed in 307 patients (aged 75.9 ± 10.4 years) with a rigid ring (RA) in 184, a flexible band (FA) in 80, or a suture annuloplasty (SA) in 43. Study end points were survival and recurrence of TR >grade 2 at 5 years., Results: TA was performed concomitantly to mitral valve surgery in 136 patients (44.3%), aortic valve surgery in 18 (5.9%), coronary artery bypass grafting in 13 (4.2%), or a combined procedure in 140 (45.6%). Most had TR >grade 2 (78.5%), without significant differences between the TA groups (P = .878). Within a median follow-up of 3.4 years (interquartile range, 2.2-5.0 years), the 5-year survival was 80.1% ± 3.4% for RA, 83.5% ± 4.7% for FA, and 85.1% ± 6.5% for SA (P = .471). Independent risk factors for late mortality were renal impairment (hazard ratio [HR], 2.83; 95% CI, 1.16-6.89; P = .022), diabetes (HR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.07-4.11; P = .030), and severe right ventricular dysfunction by tricuspid annulus plane systolic excursion <10 mm (HR, 11.52; 95% CI, 4.98-26.66; P < .001). Pulmonary hypertension was nearly significant (HR, 1.92; 95% CI, 0.98-3.74; P = .057). The cumulative incidence of TR recurrence at 5 years was 15.9%, 19.4%, and 21.1% for RA, FA, and SA, respectively (P = .342). Severe pulmonary hypertension (HR, 2.64; 95% CI, 1.38-5.07; P = .003), preoperative TR grade (HR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.01-3.27; P = .046), and residual TR >grade 2 at discharge (HR, 3.38; 95% CI, 1.64-6.96; P = .001) were predictive for later TR recurrence, regardless of the annuloplasty technique., Conclusions: This study demonstrates that advanced pathophysiological right circulatory impairment, such as severe pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular dysfunction, affects the midterm survival and TR recurrence rate more than the annuloplasty technique used for concomitant repair of functional TR., (Copyright © 2022 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)