Search

The novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 pandemic is a global health problem, which started to affect China by the end of 2019. In Europe, Italy has faced this novel disease entity (named novel coronavirus disease [COVID-19]) first and severely. COVID-19 represents a significant hurdle for public health services and a potential harm for patients with cancer. The Collegio Italiano dei Primari Oncologi Medici (CIPOMO) is an Italian association of head physicians in oncology departments, which promotes working and research activities in oncology on a national basis. In the midst of the epidemic in Italy, the CIPOMO promoted a national survey aiming to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 on clinical activity of oncologists and the implementation of containment measures of COVID-19 diffusion. Overall, 122 head physicians participated in this survey, with a homogeneous distribution on the national territory. Results show that the following measures for oncologic patients have been promptly implemented through the whole country: use of protective devices, triage of patients accessing the hospital, delay of non-urgent visits and use of telemedicine. Results of this survey suggest that Italian oncology departments have promptly set a proactive approach to the actual emergency. Oncologists need to preserve the continuum of care of patients, as the benefit of ensuring a well-delivered anti-cancer treatment plan outweighs the risk of COVID-19 infection. International cooperation is an important starting point, as heavily affected nations can serve as an example to find out ways to safely preserve health activity during the pandemic.

A concomitant drug-based score was developed by our group and externally validated for prognostic and predictive purposes in patients with advanced cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The model considers the use of three classes of drugs within a month before initiating ICI, assigning score 1 for each between proton pump inhibitor and antibiotic administration until a month before immunotherapy initiation and score 2 in case of corticosteroid intake. In the present analysis, the drug score was validated in a prospective population of 305 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with ipilimumab plus nivolumab in the first-line setting. The value of the model in predicting overall survival and progression-free survival was statistically significant and clinically meaningful, with an overall survival rate at 12 months of 73% vs. 44% (P0.0001), and median progression-free survival of 11.6 (95% CI: 9.1-14.1) months versus 4.8 (95% CI: 2.7-7.0) months (P=0.002), respectively, for patients belonging to the favorable group (score 0-1) versus the unfavorable (score 2-4). Further development will be represented by the gut microbiome analysis according to the drug-based model classification and to the outcome of patients to ICI therapy to demonstrate the link between drug exposure and immune sensitivity.

Many consider the standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) to be preoperative chemoradiotherapy, radical surgery involving a total mesorectal excision, and post-operative adjuvant chemotherapy based on the pathology of the specimen. The poor impact on distant control is a major limitation of this strategy, with metastasis rates remaining in the 25–35% range and recovery after radical surgery leading to reluctance with prescription and inconsistent patient compliance with adjuvant chemotherapy. A second limitation is the low rate of pathologic complete response (pCR) (around 10–15%) despite multiple efforts to potentiate preoperative chemoradiation regimens, which in turn means it is less effective at achieving non-operative management (NOM). Total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) is a pragmatic approach to solving these problems by introducing systemic chemotherapy at an early timepoint. Enthusiasm for delivering TNT for patients with LARC is increasing in light of the results of published randomized phase III trials, which show a doubling of the pCR rate and a significant reduction in the risk of subsequent metastases. However, there has been no demonstrated improvement in quality of life or overall survival. A plethora of potential chemotherapy schedules are available around the radiotherapy component, which include preoperative induction or consolidation with a range of options (FOLFOXIRI, FOLFOX, or CAPEOX,) and a varying duration of 6–18 weeks, prior to long course chemoradiation (LCCRT) or consolidation NACT following short-course preoperative radiation therapy (SCPRT) using 5 × 5 Gy or LCCRT using 45–60 Gy, respectively. The need to maintain optimal local control is a further important factor, and preliminary data appear to indicate that the RT schedule remains a crucial issue, especially in more advanced tumors, i.e., mesorectal fascia (MRF) invasion. Thus, there is no consensus as to the optimum combination, sequence, or duration of TNT. The selection of patients most likely to benefit is challenging, as clear-cut criteria to individuate patients benefiting from TNT are lacking. In this narrative review, we examine if there are any necessary or sufficient criteria for the use of TNT. We explore potential selection for the individual and their concerns with a generalized use of this strategy.

TPS3636 Background: KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations are well-established negative predictive biomarkers of response to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients (pts). In clinical practice, RAS/BRAF wild-type (wt) patients receive first-line therapy regimens containing anti-EGFR agents. However, tumor heterogeneity might drive primary and acquired resistance to anti-EGFR MoAbs. In fact, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing reveals RAS/BRAF mutations in approximately 10% of pts who resulted in wt at tumor tissue. In addition, 30% to 50% RAS wt pts develop, during the treatment with anti-EGFR MoAbs, RAS mut can be detected in the ctDNA several weeks before clinical progression. As today, it is not known whether revealing RAS mut in liquid biopsy (LB) earlier than the appearance of a clinical/radiological disease progression, could impact pts’ outcomes. Similarly, there are no data suggesting the best therapeutic approach in patients with RAS/BRAF wt tissue and mutated ctDNA. Methods: This is a phase III, randomized, open-label, comparative, multicenter study to assess the superiority of Bevacizumab (BEV) compared to Cetuximab (CET) plus FOLFIRI in treatment naïve mCRC RAS/BRAF wt on tumor tissue (TT) and mutated in plasma samples. RAS/BRAF wt pts on TT will undergo the first LB, and RAS mut pts will be randomized 1:1 to receive FOLFIRI/CET (control arm) or FOLFIRI/BEV (experimental arm). Instead, RAS wt pts at first LB will be treated with FOLFIRI/CET up to 8 cycles. Pts who have not progressed after 8 cycles of treatment will undergo a second LB. If RAS mut was detected, pts will be randomized 1:1 to continue FOLFIRI/CET or switch to FOLFIRI/BEV. If not, pts will continue FOLFIRI/CET outside the clinical trial. Pts will be treated until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Among 26 pts screened at the first LB, actually 1 KRAS mut and 1 BRAF mut pts were detected. The primary endpoint is the PFS Plasma samples will be analyzed for KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations by Idylla ctKRAS and Idylla ctNRAS-BRAF-EGFGR. All samples will be also analyzed by NGS, in order to better evaluate the correlation of tumor heterogeneity with pts’ outcomes. Clinical trial information: EudraCT Number: 2020-005078-82, NCT04776655.

The novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been an overwhelming challenge for worldwide health systems. Since the beginning of year 2020, COVID-19 has represented a potential harm for cancer patients and has often hindered oncology care. The Collegio Italiano dei Primari Oncologi Medici (CIPOMO) is an Italian association of head physicians in oncology departments, which promotes working and research activities in oncology on a national basis. During the second wave of COVID-19 pandemic, the CIPOMO promoted a national survey aiming to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 on oncologists’ clinical activity and what changes have been made compared with the Italian situation during the first wave of the pandemic. Overall, 138 heads of medical oncology departments participated in this survey: 75 (54%) from the North, 24 (17%) from the Center, and 39 (28%) from the South of Italy and islands. This survey provides an overview of Italian oncologists facing the second wave of COVID-19 pandemic. The lesson learned during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic has led to a better organization of clinical activities, and regular testing among healthcare practitioners, with better chances to grant patients’ protection. However, the lack of standardized informatic platforms results in serious challenges in replacing frontal visits, often making a concrete reduction of patients’ hospital accesses unfeasible. Oncologists need to keep preserving the continuum of care of patients. Standardization of safety measures, together with the implementation of informatic platforms, can significantly improve oncology pathways during this second wave of COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND Rectum-preservation for locally advanced rectal cancer has been proposed as an alternative to total mesorectal excision (TME) in patients with major (mCR) or complete clinical response (cCR) after neoadjuvant therapy. The purpose of this study was to report on the short-term outcomes of ReSARCh (Rectal Sparing Approach after preoperative Radio- and/or Chemotherapy) trial, which is a prospective, multicenter, observational trial that investigated the role of transanal local excision (LE) and watch-and-wait (WW) as integrated approaches after neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer. METHODS Patients with mid-low rectal cancer who achieved mCR or cCR after neoadjuvant therapy and were fit for major surgery were enrolled. Clinical response was evaluated at 8 and 12 weeks after completion of chemoradiotherapy. Treatment approach, incidence, and reasons for subsequent TME were recorded. RESULTS From 2016 to 2019, 160 patients were enrolled; mCR or cCR at 12 weeks was achieved in 64 and 96 of patients, respectively. Overall, 98 patients were managed with LE and 62 with WW. In the LE group, Clavien-Dindo 3+ complications occurred in three patients. The rate of cCR increased from 8- to 12-week restaging. Thirty-three (94.3%) of 35 patients with cCR had ypT0-1 tumor. At a median 24 months follow-up, a tumor regrowth was found in 15 (24.2%) patients undergoing WW. CONCLUSIONS LE for patients achieving cCR or mCR is safe. A 12-week interval from chemoradiotherapy completion to LE is correlated with an increased cCR rate. The risk of ypT > is reduced when LE is performed after cCR.

Extending the interval between the end of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and surgery may enhance tumor response in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. However, data on the association of delaying surgery with long-term outcome in patients who had a minor or poor response are lacking.To assess a large series of patients who had minor or no tumor response to CRT and the association of shorter or longer waiting times between CRT and surgery with short- and long-term outcomes.This is a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Data from 1701 consecutive patients with rectal cancer treated in 12 Italian referral centers were analyzed for colorectal surgery between January 2000 and December 2014. Patients with a minor or null tumor response (ypT stage of 2 to 3 or ypN positive) stage greater than 0 to neoadjuvant CRT were selected for the study. The data were analyzed between March and July 2020.Patients who had a minor or null tumor response were divided into 2 groups according to the wait time between neoadjuvant therapy end and surgery. Differences in surgical and oncological outcomes between these 2 groups were explored.The primary outcomes were overall and disease-free survival between the 2 groups.Of a total of 1064 patients, 654 (61.5%) were male, and the median (IQR) age was 64 (55-71) years. A total of 579 patients (54.4%) had a shorter wait time (8 weeks or less) 485 patients (45.6%) had a longer wait time (greater than 8 weeks). A longer waiting time before surgery was associated with worse 5- and 10-year overall survival rates (67.6% [95% CI, 63.1%-71.7%] vs 80.3% [95% CI, 76.5%-83.6%] at 5 years; 40.1% [95% CI, 33.5%-46.5%] vs 57.8% [95% CI, 52.1%-63.0%] at 10 years; P .001). Also, delayed surgery was associated with worse 5- and 10-year disease-free survival (59.6% [95% CI, 54.9%-63.9%] vs 72.0% [95% CI, 67.9%-75.7%] at 5 years; 36.2% [95% CI, 29.9%-42.4%] vs 53.9% [95% CI, 48.5%-59.1%] at 10 years; P .001). At multivariate analysis, a longer waiting time was associated with an augmented risk of death (hazard ratio, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.50-2.26; P .001) and death/recurrence (hazard ratio, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.39-2.04; P .001).In this cohort study, a longer interval before surgery after completing neoadjuvant CRT was associated with worse overall and disease-free survival in tumors with a poor pathological response to preoperative CRT. Based on these findings, patients who do not respond well to CRT should be identified early after the end of CRT and undergo surgery without delay.

Background: The reorganization of oncologic follow-up was crucial to maintain oncologic care and reduce patient exposure during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic Methods: Patients scheduled for follow-up oncologic visits during the lockdown period (March 9th - May 4th 2020) were included in a program of telematic follow-up (TFU) developed at the Medical Oncology Unit of Sant’Andrea and San Bartolomeo Hospital in La Spezia, Italy Eligibility for TFU was determined through a pre-screening of medical charts based on tumor type, risk of relapse, geographic accessibility and DFS Pre-calls were made by skilled nurses to assess pts’ availability for next-day phone call and to assess availability of laboratory test and imaging results A TFU form was conceived to collect pts’ clinical history, symptoms, body weight, ongoing medical therapies, DFS, blood tests and imaging results (from Hospital imaging repository or acquired in the pre-call) Pts without signs/symptoms of relapse were scheduled for the next follow-up visit and the filled-in TFU form was attached to the clinical chart When a suspected disease relapse was found, an ambulatory visit was performed Results: There were 547 pts previously scheduled for in-hospital follow-up visit between March 9th and May 4th, 2020 82 of 547 pts (15%) were considered not eligible for TFU according to the pre-screening assessment 465 pts out of 547 (85%) were included in the TFU program All these pts accepted calls with a compliance rate of 100% The median age was 73 years (34-95);152 male (33%) and 313 female (67%) The distribution by tumor type was: 179 breast cancer (38%), 86 colorectal (18%), 55 urinary tract (12%), 39 melanoma and skin (9%), 31 gynecologic (6%), 26 lung cancer(6%), 16 GEP (3%), 15 head and neck (3%), and 18 other tumors (4%) Ten patients with signs/symptoms of tumor recurrence were detected at TFU: 1 had clinical symptoms, 3 abnormal blood tests and 6 suspicious radiological findings These patients were called for live visit and tumor relapse/progression was confirmed in 10 out of 10 cases Medical or surgical treatment was started, or planned to start, in all 10 patients Conclusions: TFU proved to be feasible with an eligibility rate of 85% and 100% patients’ compliance The detection rate for tumor recurrence was 2 1% Legal entity responsible for the study: The authors Funding: Has not received any funding Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest

Background: Cancer patients are more susceptible to infections and potentially at higher risk to develop COVID-19 Tumor type and antitumor treatment may also affect both the susceptibility to and the severity of SARS COV-2 Methods: To analyze the distribution of patients who developed COVID-19 during active antineoplastic therapy and the related clinical course by tumor type, stage and class of oncologic treatment (chemo, immune, biologic, other) a multicenter, retro-prospective, observational study was proposed to the Hospital Medical Oncologic Units of the National Health Service in Italy (168 centers of the Collegio Italiano dei Primari Oncologi Medici Ospedalieri -CIPOMO) Data were collected on demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment setting, type of ongoing anti-cancer therapy and COVID-19 clinical course (phenotype, hospitalization, therapy, duration and outcome) Eligibility required a positive COVID-19 molecular test before May 4th, 2020 and at least 1 course of antitumor therapy delivered after January 15th Results: At the present analysis data are available for 116 of 168 centers (7 declined, 28 pending, 17 data awaited) 64 of 116 centers (55%) had COVID-19 positive cases (cases /center: median 3, range 1-40) At these 64 centers, 283 positive cases (males 158, 55 9% - females 125, 44 1%;median age 67 years, range 28-89) were observed among a total population of 40894 patients receiving active treatment between January 15 and May 4 2020 65 of 283 (23%) had cardiovascular comorbidities and 7 (2%) pre-existent pulmonary disease 239/283 patients (84 4%) were receiving treatment for metastatic disease and 44 (15 6%) in the adjuvant setting Breast, lung, colon and prostate cancer were the main tumor types accounting for 61 % of cases Conclusions: The occurrence of COVID-19 among cancer patients receiving active antitumor treatment appears to reflect tumor epidemiology Full analysis of the distribution of COVID-19 occurrence and clinical course by tumor type, stage and oncologic treatment will be presented Legal entity responsible for the study: The authors Funding: Has not received any funding Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is known to cause metastasis to unusual sites, which can be both synchronous or metachronous. Thyroid gland is a rare site for metastasis. However, RCC is the most common primary neoplasm to metastasize to the Thyroid gland. Report of three cases and review of the literature.

Background Treatment with fluoropyrimidines and concomitant long-course external radiotherapy (RTE) is the standard of care in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) preoperative chemoradiation. A randomized phase II study (RaP/STAR-03) was conducted that aimed to evaluate the activity and safety of the monoclonal antibody anti-epidermal growth factor receptor panitumumab as a single agent in combination with radiotherapy in low-risk LARC preoperative treatment. Materials and Methods Patients had adenocarcinoma of the mid-low rectum, cT3N− or cT2–T3N+, KRAS wild-type status, and negative circumferential radial margin. Panitumumab was administered concomitant to RTE. Rectal surgery was performed 6–8 weeks after the end of preoperative treatment. The adjuvant chemotherapy regimen was FOLFOX. The primary endpoint was the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. The sample size was calculated using Simon's two-stage design. A pCR of 16% was considered to qualify the experimental treatment for further testing. Results Ninety-eight patients were enrolled in 13 Italian centers from October 2012 to October 2015. Three panitumumab infusions were administered in 92 (93.4%) patients. The RTE compliance was median dose 50.4 Gy; ≥28 fractions in 82 (83.7%) patients. Surgical treatment was performed in 92 (93.9%) patients, and no severe intraoperative complications were observed. A pCR was observed in 10 (10.9%) patients (95% confidence interval, 4.72%–17.07%). Pathological downstaging occurred in 45 (45.9%) patients. Grade 3 toxicities were observed in 22 (22.3%) patients, and the common adverse events were skin rash in 16 (16.3%) patients. No grade 4 toxicities were reported. Conclusion The pCR rate (our primary endpoint), at only 10.9%, did not reach the specified level considered suitable for further testing. However, the analysis showed a good toxicity profile and compliance to concomitant administration of panitumumab and RTE in preoperative treatment of LARC. The pCR evaluation in all wild-type RAS is ongoing. Implications for Practice The aim of the RaP/STAR-03 study was to evaluate the activity and safety of monoclonal antibody anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) panitumumab as a single agent without chemotherapy in low-risk, locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) preoperative treatment. Nevertheless, the use of panitumumab in combination with radiotherapy in preoperative treatment in patients with KRAS wild type and low-risk LARC did not reach the pathologic complete response primary endpoint. This study showed a good toxicity profile and compliance to combination treatment. Further analysis of NRAS and BRAF on tissue and circulating levels of the EGFR ligands and vascular factors (soluble vascular endothelial growth factor, E-selectin) may provide insight on the potential molecular pathways involved in the anti-EGFR response.

Background: The standard approach for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by total mesorectal excision (TME). After nCRT 20% of patients achieve a clinical complete response (pCR) and could be treated with a non-operative management (NOM). Methods: The panel of the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM) Guidelines on rectal cancer applied the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach addressing the following question: Should NOM vs. TME be used for patients with rectal cancer with clinical complete response after nCRT? Five outcomes were identified: disease-free survival (DFS), mortality, local recurrence, colostomy rate, and functional outcomes. Results: Nine studies were included in the analysis. A higher risk of disease recurrence was observed in the NOM group compared to the TME group (RR = 1.69, 95% CI 1.08, 2.64) on the other hand, we observed a slightly positive but not significant effect on mortality of NOM (RR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.46, 1.45). Patients in the NOM group were more likely to experience local recurrence (RR = 5.37, 95% CI 2.56, 11.27) and patients in the TME group were more likely to have a permanent colostomy (RR = 0.15, 95% CI 0.08, 0.29). Only one study evaluated functional outcomes. The overall certainty of evidence was rated as very low. Conclusions: NOM was found to correlate with a higher risk of local recurrence which did not translate in worse OS and a lower colostomy rate. Due to the paucity of evidences, no recommendations are possible. NOM remains an experimental treatment; thus, patients managed with NOM should be enrolled in clinical trials with a dedicated follow-up schedule.

For the treatment of both primary and metastatic liver tumors, laparoscopic parenchyma-sparing surgery is advocated to reduce postoperative liver failure and facilitate reoperation in the case of recurrence. However, atypical and wedge resections are associated with a higher amount of intraoperative bleeding than are anatomical resections, and such bleeding is known to affect short- and long-term outcomes. Beyond the established role of radiofrequency and microwave ablation in the setting of inoperable liver tumors, the application of thermoablative energy along the plane of the liver surface to be transected results in a zone of coagulative necrosis, possibly minimizing bleeding of the cut liver surface during parenchymal transection. From January 2013 to March 2016, a total of 20 selected patients underwent laparoscopic ultrasound-guided liver resection with thermoablative precoagulation of the transection line. During a period of 38 months, 50 laparoscopic thermoablative procedures were performed. Colorectal liver metastases were the most frequent diagnosis. Seventy-two percent of the nodules were removed using parenchymal transection with radiofrequency-precoagulation, while microwave-precoagulation was performed for 20 % of the resected nodules. The remaining 8 % of the nodules were treated by thermoablation alone. The hepatic pedicle was intermittently clamped in six patients. The mean blood loss was 290 mL, and four patients required perioperative transfusions. Precoagulation-assisted parenchyma-sparing laparoscopic liver surgery can get minimal blood loss during parenchymal transection and lower the need for perioperative transfusions, providing a nonquantifiable margin of oncological safety on the remaining liver. Additional results from larger series are advocated to confirm these preliminary data.

No Abstract in Short Communication.

Skin melanoma represents one of the most common and lethal solid tumor. It usually develops on the skin but it can occur in any tissues with melanine- containing-cells (extracutaneous malignant melanoma). Only 4-5% of malignant melanomas originate in extracutaneous tissues, and they have an extremely lethal behavior (1). These non-skin malignant melanomas are rare but extremely aggressive. Primary melanoma of the genitourinary tract accounts for less than 0.2% of all melanomas. To date only 28 cases of primary bladder melanoma (PMM) are described. We report a rare case of PMM of the bladder in a 72 years old man treated with radical cystectomy and immunotherapy with Nivolumab.

Rectum-sparing approaches appear to be appropriate in rectal cancer patients with a major (mCR) or complete clinical response (cCR) after neoadjuvant therapy. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effectiveness of rectum-sparing approaches at 2 years after the completion of neoadjuvant treatment. Patients with rectal adenocarcinoma eligible to receive neoadjuvant therapy will be prospectively enrolled. Patients will be restaged 7–8 weeks after the completion of neoadjuvant therapy and those with mCR (defined as absence of mass, small mucosal irregularity no more than 2 cm in diameter at endoscopy and no metastatic nodes at MRI) or cCR will be enrolled in the trial. Patients with mCR will undergo local excision, while patients with cCR will either undergo local excision or watch and wait policy. The main end point of the study is to determine the percentage of rectum preservation at 2 years in the enrolled patients. This protocol is the first prospective trial that investigates the role of both local excision and watch and wait approaches in patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer. The trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02710812).

Purpose A common hypothesis is that neo-adjuvant treatment in rectal cancer, is able to increase sphincter saving surgery. This review studies data relevant to this question. Study selection A total of 17 randomized trials were analysed. Results Since 1976, the rate of sphincter saving surgery increased from 20% to 75%. In none of the 17 trials it was possible to demonstrate a significant benefit of the neo-adjuvant regimens on the rate of sphincter saving surgery. There was a reduction in the risk of 5-year local recurrence partly due to these neo-adjuvant treatments. These neo-adjuvant regimens had no significant impact on the overall 5-year survival. Conclusions None of the neo-adjuvant treatments tested was able to demonstrate an increase in the rate of sphincter saving surgery. The improvement in conservative surgery is mainly due to technical changes in surgery. Organ preservation after complete clinical response appears as an interesting hypothesis to test.

Purpose To investigate oxaliplatin combined with fluorouracil-based chemoradiotherapy as preoperative treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer. Patients and Methods Seven hundred forty-seven patients with resectable, locally advanced (cT3-4 and/or cN1-2) adenocarcinoma of the mid-low rectum were randomly assigned to receive pelvic radiation (50.4 Gy in 28 daily fractions) and concomitant infused fluorouracil (225 mg/m2/d) either alone (arm A, n = 379) or combined with oxaliplatin (60 mg/m2 weekly × 6; arm B, n = 368). Overall survival is the primary end point. A protocol-planned analysis of response to preoperative treatment is reported here. Results Grade 3 to 4 adverse events during preoperative treatment were more frequent with oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil and radiation than with radiation and fluorouracil alone (24% v 8% of treated patients; P < .001). In arm B, 83% of the patients treated with oxaliplatin had five or more weekly administrations. Ninety-one percent, compared with 97% in the control arm, received ≥ 45 Gy (P < .001). Ninety-six percent versus 95% of patients underwent surgery with similar rates of abdominoperineal resections (20% v 18%, arm A v arm B). The rate of pathologic complete responses was 16% in both arms (odds ratio = 0.98; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.44; P = .904). Twenty-six percent versus 29% of patients had pathologically positive lymph nodes (arm A v arm B; P = .447), 46% versus 44% had tumor infiltration beyond the muscularis propria (P = .701), and 7% versus 4% had positive circumferential resection margins (P = .239). Intra-abdominal metastases were found at surgery in 2.9% versus 0.5% of patients (arm A v arm B; P = .014). Conclusion Adding oxaliplatin to fluorouracil-based preoperative chemoradiotherapy significantly increases toxicity without affecting primary tumor response. Longer follow-up is needed to assess the impact on efficacy end points.

The increasing number of elderly people in the world’s population has led to a parallel increase in the number of older cancer patients, with over 45% of all neoplasia in Europe occurring in patients older than 70 years. Rectal cancer is predominantly a disease of the elderly. Data emerging from cohort and retrospective studies show that elderly patients are less often treated with a multidisciplinary approach, including surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, compared with their younger counterpart, probably based on the impression that older patients show poor tolerance and benefit less from the treatment. Any available analysis has confirmed this concern. Unfortunately, data from studies properly designed for the elderly are currently limited. This article focuses on the state-of-the-art approach in rectal cancer treatment and its role in older patients, focusing on how elderly differ from younger patients in terms of clinical presentation, access to multimodality programs, tolerance of the therapy and outcome.

Background: Oxaliplatin (OXA) significantly enhanced the antitumour activity of 5-fluorouracil (FUra) in patients with advanced colorectal cancer and displayed radiosensitising properties in preclinical studies. This study was thus performed to test the feasibility, identify the recommended doses (RDs) and explore preliminarily the clinical activity of weekly OXA and infused FUra combined with preoperative pelvic radiotherapy. Patients and methods: Forty-six patients with recurrent or locally advanced (cT3-4 and/or N+) adenocarcinomas of the mid-low rectum were treated with escalating doses of OXA (25, 35, 45, 60 mg/m2, weekly for 6 weeks) and FUra (200–225 mg/m2/day, 6-week infusion) concurrent to preoperative pelvic radiotherapy (50.4 Gy/28 fractions). The RDs for the phase II part of the study were immediately below the level resulting in dose-limiting toxicities in more than one third of the patients, or corresponded to the last planned dose level. Results: In the escalation phase, dose-limiting toxicities only occurred in one patient at the fourth level and one of six patients treated at the last planned dose level (grade III diarrhoea). OXA 60 mg/m2 and FUra 225 mg/m2/day are therefore the RDs for the regimen. Among 25 patients globally treated at these doses (phase II part), the incidence of grade III diarrhoea was 16% with no grade IV toxicity. Neurotoxicity did not exceed grade II (12%). All patients completed radiotherapy and were operated on as scheduled. Twenty-one of 25 patients had the tumour down-staged after chemoradiation with seven (28%) pathological complete responses and 12 (48%) residual tumours limited to ypT1-2N0. Conclusions: Weekly OXA, at doses potentially active systemically, can be combined with full-dose, infused FUra and radiotherapy. Given the low toxicity and promising activity, this regimen is being compared to standard FUra-based pelvic chemoradiation in a randomised study.

Squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) is a rare cancer but its incidence is increasing throughout the world, and is particularly high in the human immunodeficiency virus positive (HIVþ) population. A multidisciplinary approach is mandatory (involving radiation therapists, medical oncologists, surgeons, radiologists and pathologists). SCCA usually spreads in a loco-regional manner within and outside the anal canal. Lymph node involvement at diagnosis is observed in 30%e40% of cases while systemic spread is uncommon with distant extrapelvic metastases recorded in 5%e8% at onset, and rates of metastatic progression after primary treatment between 10 and 20%. SCCA is strongly associated with human papilloma virus (HPV, types 16e18) infection. The primary aim of treatment is to achieve cure with loco-regional control and preservation of anal function, with the best possible quality of life. Treatment dramatically differs from adenocarcinomas of the lower rectum. Combinations of 5FU-based chemoradiation and other cytotoxic agents (mitomycin C) have been established as the standard of care, leading to complete tumour regression in 80%e90% of patients with locoregional failures in the region of 15%. There is an accepted role for surgical salvage. Assessment and treatment should be carried out in specialised centres treating a high number of patients as early as possible in the clinical diagnosis. To date, the limited evidence from only 6 randomised trials [1,2,3,4,5,6,7], the rarity of the cancer, and the different behaviour/natural history depending on the predominant site of origin, (the anal margin, anal canal or above the dentate line) provide scanty direction for any individual oncologist. Here we aim to provide guidelines which can assist medical, radiation and surgical oncologists in the practical management of this unusual cancer. 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

We have reported that an alternating regimen of bolus and continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (FU) was superior to bolus FU in terms of response rate and progression-free survival in advanced colorectal cancer. Biochemical modulation was an essential part of this regimen and it was selective for the schedule of FU administration: bolus FU was in fact modulated by methotrexate (MTX) while continuous infusion FU was potentiated by 6-s-leucovorin (LV). Considering the low cost and the favourable report on the activity of mitomycin C (mito) added to CI FU, we have incorporated this agent in the infusional part of our treatment programme. 105 patients with untreated, advanced, measurable colorectal cancer were accrued from 13 Italian centres and treated with the following regimen. 2 biweekly cycles of FU bolus (600 mg/m2), modulated by MTX (24 h earlier, 200 mg/m2) were alternated with a 3-week continuous infusion of FU (200 mg/m2daily), modulated by LV (20 mg/m2weekly bolus). Mito, 7 mg/m2, was given on the first day of the infusional period. After a 1 week rest, the whole cycle (8 weeks) was repeated, if indicated. 5 complete and 34 partial responses were obtained (response rate, 37% on the intention to treat basis; 95% confidence limits, 28–46%). After a median follow-up time of 26 months, 37 patients are still alive. The median progression-free survival is 7.7 months with an overall survival of 18.8 months and a 2-year survival rate of 30%. The regimen was very well tolerated with fewer than 13% of patients experiencing WHO grade III–IV toxicity. These results are consistent with those obtained by our group in 3 previous trials of schedule specific biochemical modulation of FU. They also indicate a highly active, little toxic, inexpensive regimen of old drugs to be used (a) as an alternative to the more expensive combinations including CPT-11 or oxaliplatin or (b) as the basis for combination programmes with these agents. © 2001 Cancer Research Campaign http://www.bjcancer.com

We have recently reported high clinical activity against advanced colorectal cancer of a regimen-alternating bolus FUra, modulated by methotrexate (MTX), and continuous infusion FUra, modulated by 6-s-leucovorin (6-s-LV). Considering the low toxicity of the bolus part of this regimen and our recent in vitro finding of a strong synergism between bolus FUra and natural-beta-IFN (n-beta-IFN), this cytokine was incorporated in the bolus part of our treatment programme. Fifty-six patients with untreated, advanced, measurable colorectal cancer were treated with two biweekly cycles of FUra bolus (600 mg m(-2)), modulated by MTX (24 h earlier, 200 mg m(-2)), and n-beta-IFN (3 x 10(6) IU i.m. every 12 h, starting at the time of FUra administration for four doses), alternating with a 3-week continuous infusion of FUra (200 mg m(-2) daily), modulated by 6-s-LV (20 mg m(-2) weekly bolus). After a 1-week rest, the whole cycle (8 weeks) was repeated if indicated. A total of 5 complete and 17 partial responses were obtained (response rate, 41%; 95% confidence limits, 28-55%) in 54 assessable patients. After a median follow-up time of 36 months, five patients are still alive. Overall, the median time to treatment failure was 6.4 months. The median duration of survival was 15.0 months. There was one treatment-related death after a course of MTX --> bolus FUra/n-beta-IFN and grade III-IV toxicity occurred in 18% of the patients. As the addition of n-beta-IFN results in high toxicity, whereas the efficacy seems to be similar to that of the same regimen without the cytokine, our groups are currently randomizing the original regimen, without IFN, against standard modulated bolus FUra.

PURPOSE To determine if fluorouracil (FUra) has different mechanisms of action as a function of the dose schedule used. DESIGN The preclinical and clinical literature relating toxicity and antitumor effects of FUra as a function of its dose schedule, with and without modulating agents, was reviewed. RESULTS The data support the hypothesis that FUra may be considered to be two different drugs, depending on its dose schedule (bolus v continuous infusion [CI]). CONCLUSION These results suggest that additional therapeutic benefit may be obtained from FUra regimens by (1) appropriate schedule-dependent modulation, (2) the sequential or alternating use of cycles of bolus followed by cycles of CI FUra appropriately modulated, or (3) hybrid regimens, ie, those that contain both pulse and CI schedules.

In the past 15 years, the outcome for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer has substantially improved owing to the availability of new cytotoxic and biological agents along with many significant advances in molecular selection, the use of personalised therapy and locoregional treatment, a more widespread sharing of specific professional experiences (multidisciplinary teams with oncologists, surgeons, radiotherapists, radiologists, biologists and pathologists), and the adoption of patient-centred healthcare strategies. The Italian Medical Oncology Association (AIOM) has developed evidence-based recommendations to help oncologists and all professionals involved in the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in their daily clinical practice.

A total of 20 patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma were enrolled in a phase II trial testing the activity of 5-fluorouracil given at 370 mg/m2 as a rapid i. v. bolus for 5 consecutive days, preceded by a rapid i. v. bolus of 200 mg/m2 5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid. The treatment was repeated every 4 weeks. The median age of the patients was 68 years and their median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status was 1. There were 7 patients with locally advanced disease and 13 with distant metastases (median, 2 sites). A median of 3 monthly cycles of treatment (range, 1–7) were given, with a corresponding dose intensity of 396 mg/m2 per week (86% of that planned). No complete response, 1 partial response, and 8 cases of disease stabilization were obtained. In general the regimen was well tolerated, with only 2 patients suffering from grade 3 stomatitis or diarrhea; the most common toxicity was nausea, which was experienced by almost 50% of the patients. The combination of 5-methyltetrahydrofolate plus 5-fluorouracil appears as little effective in this disease as 5-fluorouracil plus 5-formyltetrahydrofolate (leucovorin). It is suggested that bolus 5-fluorouracil is so inactive as an “effector agent” against pancreatic cancer that its biochemical modulation with exogenous high-dose reduced folates cannot improve the therapeutic outcome produced by the fluoropyrimidine in these patients.

e15149Background: Despite standard preoperative pelvic chemoradiation (CRT) and optimal surgery with total mesorectal excision (TME) leading to local recurrence rates below 5% in locally advanced r...

Oxaliplatin radiosensitizes human colon carcinoma cells in preclinical models, and it has been shown to improve the efficacy of fluoropyrimidines (FPs) in the treatment of metastatic and radically resected, early-stage colon cancer. Its combination with 5-fluorouracil (FU) and radiation in the preoperative treatment of rectal cancer may thus result in improved control of micrometastases at distant sites and increased local tumor shrinkage before surgery. High rates of tumor sterilization at surgery were indeed observed in multiple phase I–II studies testing the combination of oxaliplatin with FPs and preoperative radiation, particularly when a weekly schedule was used for oxaliplatin administration. Seven randomized trials have then been launched to investigate the addition of oxaliplatin to preoperative radiation and concomitant fluorouracil or capecitabine. Safety and activity data have now been reported. The results consistently indicate that adding oxaliplatin to a fluoropyrimidine does not improve primary tumor response to preoperative chemoradiation with only one study showing a statistically significant, but limited, improvement in the rate of complete tumor sterilization at surgery and other measures of response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation similarly distributed between the groups treated with or without oxaliplatin in all of these studies. Conversely, toxicity was significantly increased when oxaliplatin was added to standard, FP-based preoperative chemoradiation. Data on clinical outcome have been so far published for four out of seven studies and show a small improvement in 3- or 5-year DFS that reaches statistical significance in only one study. There was no impact on local control, while distant metastases were slightly reduced in the three studies reporting on this endpoint (with statistical significance in one of them). While further follow-up of these trials and clinical outcome data of STAR-01 and PETACC-6 are awaited to fully understand the role of oxaliplatin added to preoperative chemoradiation, alternative strategies are being developed to incorporate oxaliplatin in the preoperative treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer, including neoadjuvant chemotherapy before chemoradiation and consolidation chemotherapy in the interval between chemoradiation and surgery.

The aim of this phase II study was to assess the activity of panitumumab in combination with oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and external radiotherapy (RT) as preoperative treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer patients.Patients had rectal adenocarcinoma, cT3N+ or cT4N-/+ stage, located12 cm from the anal margin. Panitumumab was administered before the start of chemo-RT, and every 2 weeks in combination with 5-fluorouracil-oxaliplatin with concurrent RT. Rectal surgery was carried out 7-8 weeks after the end of neoadjuvant treatment. The primary end point was a pathological complete response rate of 25%.Sixty patients were enrolled from February 2007 to October 2009. Fifty-five (91.7%) patients underwent surgery. Rate of pathological complete response was 21.1% (95% confidence interval 10.4% to 31.6%). Pathological downstaging occurred in 33 of 57 (57.9%) patients. Grade 3-4 toxicity during neoadjuvant treatment was diarrhea (38.9%), cutaneous reactions (18.6%), nausea (5.1%), asthenia (3.4%), anorexia (3.4%), and neutropenia (1.7%). One toxic death was observed for diarrhea.In our study, the primary end point is not reached and panitumumab combination treatment was associated with high incidence of grade 3-4 diarrhea. The higher pathological complete response rate in comparison with the results of previous neoadjuvant rectal cancer trials with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibodies supports further studies necessary to understand the possibility of optimal regimens and sequences with chemo-RT.

Background Our recent findings in vitro in the human colon adenocarcinoma cell line HCT-8 suggest that resistance to fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients with advanced colorectal cancer might be overcome by use of a different treatment schedule. Purpose We tested the hypothesis that HCT-8 cells resistant to short-term 5-FU exposure retain sensitivity to continuous exposure and studied interactions between the two schedules. Methods HCT-8 cell lines resistant to short-term (pulse) treatment with 5-FU or to continuous exposure were obtained by six exposures to different concentrations of 5-FU for 4 hours or 7 days. We used a monolayer clonogenic assay to determine 5-FU-induced cell kill in resistant HCT-8 cells and sensitive parent cells. Parent cells were exposed to different concentrations of 5-FU for 1, 4, or 24 hours (short term), for 7 days (continuous exposure), or in a combination of both types of schedules. In a study of the mechanism of interaction between short-term and continuous exposure in parent cells, we performed flow cytometric DNA analysis to determine the percentage of cells in S phase and assays of thymidylate synthase inhibition in intact cells and of incorporation of [6-3H)]5-FU nucleotides into nucleic acids. Results Sensitive HCT-8 cells became fully resistant to 5-FU within five or six treatments, and low-dose continuous exposure almost immediately produced resistant clones. HCT-8 cells resistant to 5-FU given every 4 hours retained full sensitivity to continuous exposure, suggesting lack of cross-resistance between the two schedules, but cells resistant to continuous exposure were cross-resistant to short-term treatment. Parent cells showed a statistically significant (synergistic) enhancement of the cytotoxic activity for 5-FU exposure for 1 hour (100, 300, or 500 microM) followed by continuous exposure (0.5, 1, or 2 microM) or 4 hours (10, 30, or 60 microM) followed by continuous exposure (1 or 2 microM). Short-term plus continuous exposure produced a marked increase in percentage of S-phase cells, compared with the percentage for each schedule alone. The combination of 1-hour exposure and continuous exposure (1000 and 2 microM, respectively) produced a marked accumulation of cells in S phase at 24 hours (59%), which lasted up to 96 hours (53%). The combination of the two schedules produced only additive enhancement of thymidylate synthase inhibition as well as incorporation of [6-3H]5-FU nucleotides into nucleic acids of HCT-8 cells. Conclusions Our findings provide a rationale for the use of bolus 5-FU and continuous infusion 5-FU in sequence. Implication We are conducting a clinical trial of bolus methotrexate followed by continuous-infusion 5-FU plus leucovorin.

The majority of colorectal cancer patients receive chemotherapy either to palliate advanced unresectable disease or to reduce the risk of recurrence after radical surgery. Thanks to the improvements in systemic chemotherapy, in the last 20 years the median survival time for patients with unresectable metastatic disease has indeed progressively increased from less than 6 to almost 24 months and recurrences after radical surgery in patients with early-stage tumors have been halved. Although colorectal cancer incidence increase with aging, there is limited scientific evidence based on prospective clinical trials to guide the management of elderly colorectal cancer patients. In addition, aging is a continuum process making strict cut-off difficult to define and homogeneous subgroups hard to identify. There is significant heterogeneity also as regards comorbidities, overall physical ability, mental health and functional status. Specific guidelines for the medical treatment of elderly colorectal cancer patients are therefore difficult to draw. While fit patients are generally treated with adult protocols and frail individuals rarely receive chemotherapy, managing the intermediate vulnerable patients requires a careful balance between the biological and psycho-social costs of treatment, the aggressiveness of the tumor and its perception by the patient. In this review, the major achievements of chemotherapy in the treatment of colorectal cancer will be described and the available data addressing the extension of these chemotherapy programs to elderly patients will be discussed. Special emphasis will be given to the development of specific treatment strategies depending on the degree of disease aggressiveness. Empirical suggestions to adapt the chemotherapy programs developed for adult fit patients to subjects with various degrees of vulnerability and frailty will also be given along with practical indications for the use of specific chemotherapeutic agents in the presence of some common elderly-related comorbidities.

Within three repeated 7-day incubation periods with either methotrexate (MTX) or trimetrexate (TMTX), human colon adenocarcinoma cells (HCT-8) developed high levels of resistance to these drugs, as evidenced by approximately 20- and 50-fold increases, respectively, in the median effective doses. Similarly, within six short-term exposures (4 hours) to the same drugs, a high degree of resistance developed in the cells. Alternating 4-hour treatment cycles with MTX and TMTX did not delay the onset of resistance to these antimetabolites in the HCT-8 cells. The same strategy produced no better results than giving either MTX or TMTX alone to (C57BL/6 x DBA/2)F1 mice bearing murine leukemia P388 cells. Furthermore, HCT-8 cells resistant to short-term (4-hour) exposure to MTX were cross-resistant to the same drug given for 7 days continuously, and cells resistant to MTX given continuously for 7 days were cross-resistant to the same drug given for 4 hours. Analogous results were obtained with TMTX, indicating that, under these circumstances, changing the schedule of administration of the same agent does not overcome resistance to it. The clinical relevance of these data to prolonged adjuvant chemotherapy, as well as loco-regional and continuous-infusion chemotherapy, is discussed.

The management of rectal cancer requires a multidisciplinary approach with individual treatment based on a careful assessment of tumour location, stage and resectability. Early identification of the patients that are candidates for combined modality treatment is crucial. After showing less acute and long-term toxicity along with an improved local control in a randomized study, pre-operative combined chemoradiation has in fact recently replaced post-operative radiochemotherapy as standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer [1]. Multimodality treatment and the optimization of single treatment components [surgery in particular with the introduction of total mesorectal excision (TME)] have concurred and improved the prognosis of locally advanced rectal cancer with local recurrences decreasing from 40 to 80% in the 2000s [3]. Of note, the substantial improvement in local control has not been paralleled by a similar decrease in distant metastases that represent the site of failure for up to 30% of patients, despite optimal surgery and preor post-operative radiation with concomitant, radiosensitizing, and sequential, adjuvant, 5-fluorouracil (FU)-based chemotherapy (Figure 1) [1, 4, 5]. The role and limits of the chemotherapy regimens used in the standard combined-modality treatment programs for rectal cancer and the ongoing research to improve these regimens will be reviewed in this article in the light of the specific aims and current indications of adjuvant/neoadjuvant treatment.