Search

Introduction: Ocular toxoplasmosis is the leading cause of posterior uveitis worldwide, affecting individuals acrossdifferent age groups. The key to reducing vision loss includes prompt diagnosis and treatment. However, despite the prevalence of ocular toxoplasmosis, there has been little consensus regarding its pathophysiology,clinical features, diagnosis, and especially management. Methods: The data sources were literature reviews, including Pub Med and Medline databases. Search terms included toxoplasmosis, retinitis, vasculitis, vitritis, uveitis alone or in combination with, serum, aqueous, vitreous eye, ocular and review. Results: In this review paper, we have sought to provide an overview of the pathophysiology, epidemiology, and clinical features of the disease, both based on current literature and our own clinical experience. We have also discussed the use of serology, ocular fluid, and ophthalmic investigations that could further facilitate the diagnosis of ocular toxoplasmosis.Different management strategies have been reported worldwide, including newer approaches such as local therapy. Conclusion: A better understanding of critical aspects of ocular toxoplasmosis will hopefully lead to reduced morbidity, including blindness associated with this condition.

Purpose The COVID-19 pandemic has galvanized the development of new vaccines at an unprecedented pace. Since the widespread implementation of vaccination campaigns, reports of ocular adverse effects after COVID-19 vaccinations have emerged. This review summarizes ocular adverse effects possibly associated with COVID-19 vaccination, and discusses their clinical characteristics and management. Methods Narrative Literature Review. Results Ocular adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccinations include facial nerve palsy, abducens nerve palsy, acute macular neuroretinopathy, central serous retinopathy, thrombosis, uveitis, multiple evanescent white dot syndrome, Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease reactivation, and new-onset Graves’ Disease. Studies in current literature are primarily retrospective case series or isolated case reports – these are inherently weak in establishing association or causality. Nevertheless, the described presentations resemble the reported ocular manifestations of the COVID-19 disease itself. Hence, we hypothesize that the human body’s immune response to COVID-19 vaccinations may be involved in the pathogenesis of the ocular adverse effects post-COVID-19 vaccination. Conclusion Ophthalmologists and generalists should be aware of the possible, albeit rare, ocular adverse effects after COVID-19 vaccination.

Purpose To describe the adverse events associated with brolucizumab, in particular the sequence of intraocular inflammation (IOI), retinal vasculitis (RV), and/or retinal vascular occlusion (RO). Methods This was an unmasked post hoc analysis of the randomized HAWK/HARRIER clinical trials. Patients with neovascular AMD in the brolucizumab arms of the trials were included. IOI-related adverse events reported by study investigators were analyzed to determine early signs and the time course of IOI-related adverse events, using a subgroup of patients with definite/probable IOI cases identified in an independent unmasked post hoc review by an external safety review committee. A limited literature review on IOI following anti-VEGF therapy was also conducted. Results Among 50 patients with definite/probable IOI cases identified by the safety review committee, 12 had RV or RO adverse events reported by the investigators. For 6 of 12, IOI (other than RV) was reported before RV or RO. The duration from the first IOI adverse event to the first RV or RO adverse event ranged from 16 to 171 days for 5 patients and was 553 days for 1 patient. Four of the 6 patients received ≥ 1 brolucizumab injection on or after the date of the first IOI adverse event and before the first RV or RO adverse event. Conclusions IOI may precede RV or RO in some patients treated with brolucizumab.

The COVID-19 pandemic has galvanized the global response towards the development of new vaccines based on novel technologies at an unprecedented pace. Since the widespread implementation of vaccination campaigns, case reports on vaccines' systemic side effects, including ocular manifestations, have emerged. Since administered vaccines are generally not able to cause the disease in the recipient, or induce an immune response against the pathogen, we hypothesize that the development of ocular phenomena post-COVID-19 vaccination may occur via an immune response elicited by the vaccine. Of many, the most common ocular adverse events include facial nerve palsy, central venous sinus thrombosis and acute anterior uveitis. These COVID-19 vaccine-induced ocular (CVIO) adverse events could resemble the ocular findings in some of the COVID-19 patients. This review will provide a comprehensive overview of published ocular side effects potentially associated with COVID-19 vaccination and serve as a springboard for further research into CVIO adverse events.

To examine the 36-month efficacy and safety of a 0.2 μg/day fluocinolone acetonide insert (FAi) to treat noninfectious uveitis of the posterior segment (NIU-PS).Phase 3, prospective, double-masked, multicenter study (clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01694186).Adults (≥18 years old) with a diagnosis of NIU-PS in ≥1 eye for ≥1 year and ≥2 recurrences of uveitis requiring systemic corticosteroid, immunosuppressive treatment, or intraocular corticosteroids.Participants were randomized 2:1 to FAi or sham (injection plus standard of care) treatment.The primary outcome was the difference between the proportion of FAi-treated and sham-treated patients who had a uveitis recurrence. Secondary outcomes included time to first recurrence, number of recurrences, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) change from baseline, resolution of macular edema, and number of adjunctive treatments.One hundred twenty-nine participants (n = 87 FAi-treated; n = 42 sham-treated) were enrolled. Over 36 months of treatment, cumulative uveitis recurrences were significantly reduced with FAi compared with sham (65.5% vs. 97.6%, respectively; P0.001); time to first recurrence was commensurately longer (median 657.0 and 70.5 days, respectively; P0.001). The number of recurrences per eye was significantly lower in the FAi-treated compared with the sham-treated group (mean 1.7 vs. 5.3, respectively, P0.001). At 36 months, more FAi-treated eyes had a ≥15-letter increase in BCVA from baseline and fewer FAi-treated eyes had investigator-determined macular edema at month 36 compared with sham-treated eyes (33.3% vs. 14.7% and 13.0% vs. 27.3% for BCVA and macular edema, respectively). Fewer FAi compared with sham-treated participants required adjunctive treatments (57.5% vs. 97.6%, respectively). Intraocular pressure (IOP) was similar for both study groups at month 36 (mean ± standard deviation 14.5±5.1 and 14.8±5.3, respectively), and approximately half as many eyes in the FAi-treated group when compared with the sham-treated group underwent IOP-lowering surgery (5.7% vs. 11.9%). Cataract surgery was required more frequently over 36 months in the FAi-treated compared with the sham-treated group (73.8% vs. 23.8% of eyes, respectively).Fluocinolone acetonide insert-treated eyes had significantly reduced uveitis recurrence rates throughout the study duration, significantly increased recurrence-free durations, fewer recurrence episodes among those with recurrences, less adjunctive therapy, and an acceptable side-effect profile compared with sham-treated eyes.

To describe the clinical spectrum and outcome of patients with presumed tubercular uveitis and choroidal involvement.A retrospective case series nested in a cohort study was enrolled at a tertiary referral eye care center in the UK. Failure was defined as recurrence of lesion within 6 months of completion of antitubercular therapy (ATT) or corticosteroid therapy.Seventy-seven patients with presumed ocular tuberculosis and choroidal involvement were included in the study. Mean age was 45.5 ± 15.7 years, 44 (57.1%) patients were male, and 51 (66.2%) presented with bilateral disease. Choroidal granuloma was the most frequent clinical presentation (n = 27, 35.07%), followed by multifocal choroiditis (n = 24, 31.17%) and serpiginous-like choroiditis (n = 18, 23.38%). Quantiferon Gold in Tube Test (QFT) was positive in 64 (83.11%) patients. Fifty (64.94%) patients received ATT.Choroidal involvement in presumed ocular tuberculosis can present with a variable spectrum. Treatment failure rates were equivalent between ATT and non-ATT treated groups.

PURPOSE: To evaluate a proposed method for objective measurement of vitreous inflammation using a spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD OCT) device in a large cohort of uveitis eyes, including pseudophakic eyes and vitrectomized eyes.DESIGN: Retrospective, observational cohort study.METHODS: One hundred five uveitis eyes (105 patients) with different vitreous haze score grades according to standardized protocols and corresponding SD OCT images (Cirrus HD-OCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, California, USA) were included. Clinical data recorded included phakic status, previous vitreoretinal surgery, and anterior chamber (AC) cells and flare. SD OCT images were analyzed using custom software that provided absolute measurements of vitreous (VIT) and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) signal intensities, which were compared to generate a relative optical density ratio with arbitrary units (VIT/RPE-relative intensity) and compared to VHS.RESULTS: VIT/RPE-relative intensity showed a significant positive correlation with vitreous haze score (r = 0.535, P < .001) that remained significant after adjusting for factors governing media clarity, such as AC cells, AC flare, and phakic status (R(2)-adjusted = 0.424, P < .001). Significant differences were also observed between the different vitreous haze score groups (P < .001). Preliminary observation did not observe differences in VIT/RPE-relative intensity values between phakic and pseudophakic eyes (0.3522 vs 0.3577, P = .48) and between nonvitrectomized and vitrectomized eyes (0.3540 vs 0.3580, P = .52), overall and respectively for each vitreous haze score subgroup.CONCLUSIONS: VIT/RPE-relative intensity values provide objective measurements of vitreous inflammation employing an SD OCT device. Phakic status and previous vitrectomy surgery do not appear to influence these values, although these preliminary findings need validation in future studies.

To describe the ocular and systemic features in biopsy proven (definite) and non-biopsy proven (clinical) ocular sarcoidosis and to compare the ocular features with those proposed by the International Workshop for Ocular Sarcoidosis (IWOS).Retrospective chart review of 83 patients who attended a tertiary referral uveitis clinic and were diagnosed with sarcoidosis. Patients were divided into two groups based on the type of diagnosis: those who had tissue biopsy confirmed diagnosis 'definite sarcoidosis' (n= 42; 50.60 %) and those who had 'clinical sarcoidosis' (n= 41; 49.40%). Ocular and systemic manifestations, including lung function tests and bronchoalveolar lavage findings were compared in the two groups. The ocular features were also compared with the categories laid down by the International Workshop on Ocular Sarcoidosis (IWOS).The mean age at presentation was 38.75 years (SD=12.33), 55.42% patients were female and mean follow-up was 24.35 months (SD=18.35). Trabecular meshwork nodules and/or tent-shaped PAS (category II of IWOS) were observed more frequently in patients with biopsy proven sarcoidosis (26.19 % v/s 9.76%; p=0.08). After logistic regression analysis, the predictor coefficient curve showed area under curve of 0.7262. Lymphocytosis (38.61% and 28.02%, p=0.93) and monocytosis (55.11% and 53.83%, p=0.56) on bronchoalveolar lavage analysis was present in both the groups, highlighting presence of granulomatous disease.This study suggests high reliability for the clinical diagnosis of ocular sarcoidosis in patients with signs recommended by IWOS and that our diagnostic criteria are consistent with that of the IWOS.

To study the effects of intravitreal foscarnet and the clinical differences between varicella zoster virus (VZV) and herpes simplex virus (HSV) induced acute retinal necrosis (ARN).Retrospective comparative case series.Eighty-one eyes of 74 patients.A retrospective case note analysis was performed in 2 tertiary referral centers.Presenting and final visual acuity, and progression to retinal detachment.Thirty-three eyes had HSV-ARN and 48 had VZV-ARN. The average age for HSV-ARN was 34 years and 51 for VZV-ARN (P0.001). Visual acuity on presentation was similar (P = 0.48), but a larger proportion had better vision (or =20/60) in the HSV-ARN group (52%) than the VZV-ARN group (35%). A greater proportion of eyes with poor vision (or =20/200) was found at the 12-month follow-up in the VZV-ARN group (60%) compared with the HSV-ARN group (35%). A greater degree of visual loss in the VZV-ARN group (0.4 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]) compared with the HSV-ARN group (0.04 logMAR) was detected (P = 0.016). Retinal detachment was 2.5-fold more common in VZV-ARN (62%) compared with HSV-ARN (24%). When comparing eyes treated with (n = 56) and without (n = 25) intravitreal foscarnet, there was a 40% lower rate in retinal detachment (53.6% vs 75.0%) for VZV-ARN (P = 0.23). The numbers with HSV-ARN were too small for analysis.The results support the difference of outcome in HSV-ARN and VZV-ARN. Therefore, viral identification serves as a key to predicting outcome in these patients. Intravitreal foscarnet seems to be a useful adjunct for the treatment of ARN in that it reduced rate of retinal detachment.

Macular edema is the final common pathway of many intraocular and systemic insults. It may develop in a diffuse pattern where the macula appears generally thickened or it may acquire the characteristic petaloid appearance referred to as cystoid macular edema. Although macular edema may be associated with protean underlying conditions, it is most commonly seen following intraocular surgery, venous occlusive disease, diabetic retinopathy, and posterior segment inflammatory disease. As well as clinical suspicion, a wide range of investigations may lead to the diagnosis of macular edema. Fluorescein angiography and optical coherence tomography provide enhanced visualization of the geometry and distribution of macular edema. A variety of approaches to the treatment of macular edema have been attempted, with a variable degree of success. These options have included topical and systemic steroids, topical and oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents and laser photocoagulation treatment. More recently other therapeutic modalities, including immunomodulators, intravitreal injection of triamcinolone, and pars plana vitrectomy have also been employed. Clinical trials are currently looking into the use of a steroid slow-release intravitreal device for the management of macular edema secondary to uveitis and diabetes. This article reviews the clinical entity of macular edema focusing on the current therapeutic strategies for its management.

This study describes the clinical features, management, and outcome of 19 patients who had severe Acanthamoeba sclerokeratitis (ASK) unresponsive to conventional management, requiring systemic immunosuppression to control disease.Retrospective, non-comparative, interventional case series.Records of all patients with Acanthamoeba keratitis treated at Moorfields Eye Hospital between 1989 and 2000 were reviewed. From more than 200 patients, 19 who developed ASK treated with systemic immunosuppression were identified.Visual acuity, level of pain, and degree of inflammation were recorded after immunosuppressive treatment.ASK requiring immunosuppression occurred in 20 eyes of 19 patients (11 males and 8 females). The mean age (mean +/- standard deviation) at onset was 38.6 +/- 13.2 years. On presentation, best-corrected visual acuity was counting fingers or worse in 11 eyes (55%), 6/18 to 6/60 in 5 eyes (25%), and 6/12 or better in 4 eyes (20%). The mean time between onset of initial symptoms of Acanthamoeba keratitis and commencement of systemic immunosuppression was 4.8 +/- 3.5 months. The mean duration of immunosuppression required to control inflammation was 7.2 +/- 3.9 months. Severe scleritic pain remained uncontrolled in two patients and resulted in enucleation. Best-corrected visual acuity at final follow-up was counting fingers or worse in eight eyes (40%), 6/18 to 6/60 in six eyes (30%), and 20/40 or better in six eyes (30%). The mean follow-up period after resolution of inflammation was 24.3 +/- 20.9 months (range, 0.2-59.7 months).ASK is an uncommon complication of Acanthamoeba keratitis. The scleritis associated with this infection seems to be an immune-mediated response. After topical amebicidal treatment, systemic immunosuppression may be required to control the pain and tissue destruction associated with ASK.

A 17-year-old boy presented to the emergency room with a 48-hour history of deterioration in the vision of his right eye. Visual acuity was measured at 6/24 in the right eye and 6/6 in the left eye. In the right eye, a small subhyaloid hemorrhage and an associated vitreous hemorrhage were noted. During the next month, the preretinal hemorrhage cleared, revealing a vascularized chorioretinal granuloma in the superotemporal quadrant. A serous retinal detachment with marked retinal exudate was evident, indicating that the lesion was active (Panel A). A physical examination showed no other abnormalities, and the patient's history was unremarkable . . .