Search

Glyphosate-based herbicides (GBH) -the most widely used herbicides in agriculture worldwide-are frequently generalized by the name of “glyphosate”. However, GBH encompass a variety of glyphosate salts as active ingredient and different adjuvants, which differ between products. These herbicides reach water bodies and produce diverse impacts over aquatic communities. Yet, the risk assessment assays required for the approval focus mostly on active ingredients. Herein, we compared the effect of five different GBH as well as of monoisopropylamine salt of glyphosate (GIPA) on aquatic microbial communities from natural shallow lakes that were mixed and allowed to evolve in an outdoor pond. We performed an 8-day long assay under indoor control conditions to evaluate the effects of exposure on the structure of nano-plus microphytoplankton (net phytoplankton, with sizes between 2 and 20 μm and >20 μm, respectively) and picoplankton (size ranging between 0.2 and 2 μm) communities through microscopy and flow cytometry, respectively. Significantly different effects were evident on the structure of microbial communities dependent on the GBH, even with herbicides sharing similar active ingredients. Each GBH evoked increases of different magnitude in bacterioplankton abundance. Furthermore, GIPA and a formulation decreased the abundance of a phycocyanin-rich (PC-rich) picocyanobacteria (Pcy) cytometric population and GIPA further altered Pcy composition. Also, two GBH increased net phytoplankton total abundance and, unlike the tested GBH, no apparent effect of GIPA was detected on this community structure. These results demonstrate that GBH effects on aquatic microbial communities should not be summarized as “glyphosate” effects considering that the formulations have effects beyond those exerted by the active ingredients alone. This work intends to alert on the lack of real knowledge regarding the consequences of the variety of GBH on natural aquatic ecosystems. Indeed, the wide use of the term “glyphosate effect” should be thoroughly rethought.

Massive use of glyphosate-based herbicides in agricultural activities has led to the appearance of this herbicide in freshwater systems, which represents a potential threat to these systems and their communities. These herbicides can affect autotrophic and heterotrophic picoplankton abundance. However, little is known about glyphosate impact on the whole structure of these assemblages. Herein, we used an 8-day long microcosm approach under indoor controlled conditions to analyze changes in the structure of picoplankton exposed to a single pulse of glyphosate. The analyzed picoplankton correspond to two outdoor ponds with contrasting states: "clear" (chlorophyll-a = 3.48 μg L-1± 1.15; nephelometric turbidity, NTU = 1) and "turbid" (chlorophyll-a = 105.96 μg L-1 ± 15.3; NTU = 48). We evaluated herbicide impact on different picoplankton cytometric populations and further explored changes in bacterial dominant operational taxonomic units (OTUs) fingerprinting. We observed that glyphosate induced a drastic decrease in the abundance of phycocyanin-rich picocyanobacteria. Particularly, in the turbid system this effect resulted in an 85 % decrease in the abundance of the whole autotrophic picoplankton. Glyphosate also changed the structure of the heterotrophic fraction by means of changing bacterial dominant OTUs fingerprinting patterns in both systems and by shifting the relative abundances of cytometric groups in the clear scenario. These results demonstrate that upon glyphosate exposure picoplanktonic fractions face not only the already reported changes in abundance, but also alterations in the composition of cytometric groups and of bacterial dominant operational taxonomic units. This research provides suitable and still little explored tools to analyze agrochemical effects on picoplanktonic communities.