Search

Purpose: We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of metformin for treating patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer and to identify endocrine and metabolic phenotypic features or tumor molecular markers associated with sensitivity to metformin antineoplastic action.Experimental Design: We designed an open-label, randomized, phase II trial to assess the efficacy of adding metformin to a standard systemic therapy with cisplatin, epirubicin, capecitabine, and gemcitabine (PEXG) in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Patients ages 18 years or older with metastatic pancreatic cancer were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive PEXG every 4 weeks in combination or not with 2 g oral metformin daily. The primary endpoint was 6-months progression-free survival (PFS-6) in the intention-to-treat population.Results: Between August 2010 and January 2014, we randomly assigned 60 patients to receive PEXG with (n = 31) or without metformin (n = 29). At the preplanned interim analysis, the study was ended for futility. PFS-6 was 52% [95% confidence interval (CI), 33–69] in the control group and 42% (95% CI, 24–59) in the metformin group (P = 0.61). Furthermore, there was no difference in disease-free survival and overall survival between groups. Despite endocrine metabolic modifications induced by metformin, there was no correlation with the outcome. Single-nucleotide polymorphism rs11212617 predicted glycemic response, but not tumor response to metformin. Gene expression on tumor tissue did not predict tumor response to metformin.Conclusions: Addition of metformin at the dose commonly used in diabetes did not improve outcome in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer treated with standard systemic therapy. Clin Cancer Res; 22(5); 1076–85. ©2015 AACR.See related commentary by Yang and Rustgi, p. 1031

Purpose: TPX-0046 is designed to overcome resistance to FDA approved RET inhibitors Selpercatinib and Pralsetinib. Early prediction of resistance mechanisms to investigational drugs may facilitate subsequent drug and trial designs. This study aims to predict potential mutations inducing resistance to TPX-0046.Materials and methods: We conducted an in-silico analysis of TPX-0046 macrocyclic structure and predicted the binding mode on RET. We used as reference literary examples of resistance mechanisms to other macrocyclic inhibitors (Lorlatinib on ALK/ROS1) to construct RET secondary resistance mutations. We conducted docking simulations to evaluate impact of mutations on TPX-0046 binding.Results: TPX-0046 binding mode on RET appears to not be influenced by Solventfront G810X mutation presence. Bulky Gatekeeper V804X mutations affect predicted TPX-0046 binding mode. Mutations in Beta 7 strand region L881F and xDFG S891L impair TPX-0046 docking.Conclusions: Our findings suggest that development of second generation RET inhibitors focused mainly on Solventfront G810X mutations granting resistance to selective RET inhibitors Selpercatinib and Pralsetinib. If these findings are confirmed by identification of Gatekeeper V804X mutations in patients progressing to TPX-0046, explanation of acquired resistance and loss of benefit will be easier These findings might accelerate development of third generation RET inhibitors, as well as clinical trial design in precision oncology settings.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) yielded unprecedented efficacy in patients with microsatellite instability (MSI)-high metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Since the Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value (PIV) is a blood-based biomarker with prognostic usefulness in mCRC, it might predict clinical outcomes and primary resistance to ICIs.We retrospectively analysed the association of PIV and its early modulation at 3/4 weeks after treatment initiation with the outcomes of MSI-high mCRC patients receiving anti-programmed death-(ligand)1 (PD-[L]1) +/- anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) agents. PIV was calculated as follows: (neutrophil count × platelet count × monocyte count)/lymphocyte count. PIV cut-offs were determined using the maximally selected rank statistics.A total of 163 patients were included. In the multivariable models for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), both high (492) baseline PIV (OS: adjusted [a] HR, 3.00; 95% CI, 1.49-6.04, p = 0.002; PFS: aHR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.06-3.44, p = 0.031) and early PIV increase ≥+30% (OS: aHR, 3.21; 95% CI, 1.65-6.23, p 0.001; PFS: aHR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.30-3.89, p = 0.003) confirmed an independent prognostic impact. After stratifying patients according to baseline PIV and ICI regimen, OS and PFS were significantly worse in subjects with high PIV receiving anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy. Early PIV increase was an independent predictor of clinical benefit (aOR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.08-0.66; p = 0.007), whereas a trend was observed for baseline PIV (aOR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.10-1.07; p = 0.065).PIV is a strong predictor of outcomes in MSI-high mCRC patients receiving ICIs. Prospective validation of these results is required to establish its role as a stratification factor for personalised combination strategies.

International audience; Aberrant activation of RET is a critical driver of growth and proliferation in diverse solid tumours. Multikinase inhibitors (MKIs) showing anti-RET activities have been tested in RET-altered tumours with variable results. The low target specificity with consequent increase in side-effects and off-target toxicities resulting in dose reduction and drug discontinuation are some of the major issues with MKIs. To overcome these issues, new selective RET inhibitors such as pralsetinib (BLU-667) and selpercatinib (LOXO-292) have been developed in clinical trials, with selpercatinib recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The results of these trials showed marked and durable antitumour activity and manageable toxicity profiles in patients with RET-altered tumours. The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Translational Research and Precision Medicine Working Group (TR and PM WG) launched a collaborative project to review the available methods for the detection of RET gene alterations, their potential applications and strategies for the implementation of a rational approach for the detection of RET fusion genes and mutations in human malignancies. We present here recommendations for the routine clinical detection of targetable RET rearrangements and mutations.

Aim Severe neurological and endocrine toxicities are well recognised adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, the underlying pathophysiology is poorly understood, and classical circulating markers are often non-informative, making it difficult to obtain a precise diagnosis and to initiate timely and effective treatment. Here we investigated immune-modulating activity in the plasma of a mesothelioma patient who developed fatal neuroendocrine toxicity characterised by insulin-dependent diabetes, hypophisitis and a myasthenia-like syndrome while on treatment with the dual PD1 and TIM3 blockade. Methods We used an in vitro functional assay for unbiased detection of plasma dendritic cell–modulating activity, followed by cytokine quantification by the Cytokine Bead Array. Results Immunosuppressive treatment as per established guidelines could not prevent the fatal outcome. Patient's plasma contained a dendritic cell–stimulating activity that induced specific markers (CD25+) compatible with T-helper 17 stimulation. Consistently, elevated levels of interleukin 17 (IL17A), but no other cytokines, were identified in the patient's plasma but not in controls (healthy volunteers and patients treated with immunotherapy without neuroendocrine toxicities). Conclusion If confirmed in larger series, these data suggest IL17 as a candidate diagnostic and therapeutic target in the management of high-grade neuroendocrine immune-related adverse events.

Baseline tumour burden is a prognostic factor for patients with melanoma and non-small-cell lung cancer treated with immunotherapy. However, no data are available on its role in other solid tumours, nor for treatment with next-generation immunoncology agents (NGIOs).We reviewed data of patients with any solid tumour consecutively treated at our institution from August 2014 to March 2019, who received ≥1 dose of immune checkpoint inhibitor and/or NGIO within phase 1 trials. Baseline tumour burden was calculated as ∑i Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours 1.1 baseline target lesions (baseline tumour size [BTS]) or as sum of all measurable baseline lesions (total tumour burden [TTB]); the impact of both parameters on treatment outcomes was investigated.One hundred fifty patients were included in the analysis. Median BTS and TTB were 79 mm and 212 mm, respectively. Objective response rate was found significantly associated with BTS (p 0.001) and TTB quartiles (p = 0.006), with response rates progressively increasing with decreasing tumour burden quartiles. Both progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (p 0.001) were significantly associated with BTS quartiles, with 26% of the patients progression-free and 56% alive at 12 months in the lower BTS quartile, compared with 3% and 24%, respectively, in the upper quartile. TTB was also significantly associated with OS (P = 0.01) and borderline-significant for PFS (p = 0.07). Multivariate analysis confirmed that baseline burden, also considered as continuous variable, is independently associated with PFS and OS, when assessed with BTS (p = 0.001 and p 0.001) and TTB (p = 0.007 and p 0.001).Lower baseline tumour burden is associated with better outcomes in patients with cancer treated with novel immunotherapies.

Simple Summary We investigated for the first time the safety profile of COVID-19 vaccines in patients receiving new antineoplastic agents in early-stage clinical trials, including new immuno-regulatory anti-cancer investigational compounds and drug combinations. We found that about three-quarters of the patients under active anticancer treatments experienced mild to moderate adverse effects (AEs) related to COVID-19 vaccines. Patients enrolled in early-phase trials or receiving experimental immunotherapy agents did not experience worse AEs related to the vaccine than patients with cancer not enrolled in these trials, receiving approved drugs. The safety profile of COVID-19 vaccines in patients enrolled in early-phase clinical trials, including those treated with new immune checkpoint inhibitors, does not seem to differ from that of the general population of patients with cancer. Our data support the current vaccine prioritization of all cancer patients with active treatment and calls for data sharing from vaccinated patients enrolled in early-phase clinical trials. Abstract Pivotal trials of COVID-19 vaccines did not include cancer patients, with questions remaining about their safety and efficacy in this population. Patients enrolled in early-phase clinical trials receive novel treatments with unknown efficacy and safety profiles. Studies on the safety of COVID-19 vaccines in these patients are urgently required. This is a retrospective, real-world, cohort study of patients receiving anticancer treatments and COVID-19 vaccines between 1 February and 25 June 2021 at the Division of New Drugs Development for Innovative Therapies of the European Institute of Oncology. One hundred thirteen patients were enrolled, 40 in early-phase clinical trials, and 20 under novel immunotherapy agents. Nearly three-quarters of the patients experienced at least one adverse event (AE) after the first dose (1D) (74.3%) and second dose (2D) (72.6%). Most of the AEs were local (67.3% 1D and 61.9% after 2D), while 31.8% (1D) and 38.1% (2D) of the patients had systemic AEs. No AEs above grade 2 were observed. Therefore, COVID-19 vaccines appear to be safe in patients enrolled in early-phase clinical trials, including patients receiving novel immunotherapy compounds. All cancer patients should be prioritized for COVID-19 vaccination, regardless of ongoing treatments or enrollment in early-phase trials.

Introduction: Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)/fibroblast growth factor (FGF) is a pathway characterized by recurring alterations in cancer. Its dysregulations enhance cancer cell proliferation, survival, migration and invasion, as well as angiogenesis and immune evasion.Areas covered: FGFR/FGF selective inhibitors belong to a broad class of drugs with some being approved for specific indications and others under investigation in ongoing phase I and II clinical trials. In this review, all available clinical data from trials on selective FGFR/FGF inhibitors as well as described resistance mutations and mechanisms are presented. FGFR/FGF pathway inhibitors are classified according to the mechanism they employ to dampen/suppress signaling and to the preferred FGFR binding mode when X-ray crystal structure is available.Expert opinion: Data presented suggests the general actionability of FGFR1,2,3 mutations and fusions across histologies, whereas FGFR1,2,3 amplifications alone are poor predictors of response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Overexpression on immunohistochemistry (IHC) of FGF19, the stimulatory ligand of FGFR4, can predict response to FGFR selective inhibitors in hepatocellular carcinoma. Whereas IHC overexpression of FGFR1,2,3 is not sufficient to predict benefit from FGFR inhibitors across solid tumors. FGFR1,2,3 mRNA overexpression can predict response even in absence of structural alteration. Data on resistance mutations suggests the need for new inhibitors to overcome gatekeeper mutations.

Cancers are composed of transformed cells, characterized by aberrant growth and invasiveness, in close relationship with non-transformed healthy cells and stromal tissue. The latter two comprise the so-called tumor microenvironment (TME), which plays a key role in tumorigenesis, cancer progression, metastatic seeding, and therapy resistance. In these regards, cancer-TME interactions are complex and dynamic, with malignant cells actively imposing an immune-suppressive and tumor-promoting state on surrounding, non-transformed, cells. Immune cells (both lymphoid and myeloid) can be recruited from the circulation and/or bone marrow by means of chemotactic signals, and their functionality is hijacked upon arrival at tumor sites. Molecular characterization of tumor-TME interactions led to the introduction of novel anti-cancer therapies targeting specific components of the TME, such as immune checkpoint blockers (ICB) (i.e., anti-programmed death 1, anti-PD1; anti-Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Antigen 4, anti-CTLA4). However, ICB resistance often develops and, despite the introduction of newer technologies able to study the TME at the single-cell level, a detailed understanding of all tumor-TME connections is still largely lacking. In this work, we highlight the main cellular and extracellular components of the TME, discuss their dynamics and functionality, and provide an outlook on the most relevant clinical data obtained with novel TME-targeting agents, with a focus on T lymphocytes, macrophages, and cancer-associated fibroblasts.

‘First-generation’ immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Antigen 4 (CTLA4) and Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD(L)1) have undoubtedly revolutionised the treatment of multiple cancers in the advanced setting. Targeting signalling pathways other than core inhibitory modules may strongly impact the outcome of the antitumour immune response. Drugs targeting these pathways (‘next-generation’ immune modulators, NGIMs) constitute a major frontier in translational research and have generated unprecedented scientific and financial investment. Here, we systematically reviewed published literature, abstracts from major cancer conferences and pharma pipelines to identify NGIMs that have reached clinical development. We identified 107 molecules targeting 16 pathways, which we classified into 6 groups according to function (inhibitory vs stimulatory) and cell of predominant expression (lymphoid, non-lymphoid and natural killer). We identified all registered past and ongoing clinical trials (n = 428). We summarise the preclinical rationale for these targets, extracting translationally relevant information, and review published and preliminary clinical results. Some targets like indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase 1, lymphocyte activation gene-3 and IL15 have experienced exceptional growth of interest, measured in terms of activated studies and expected patient enrolment over time. We conclude that in this vast and rapidly changing drug development landscape, novel trial designs and better biomarker identification are necessary to optimise resource allocation

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) represents a heterogeneous subtype of breast cancer characterized by an unfavorable prognosis due to its aggressive biology. The median overall survival (OS) for patients with metastatic TNBC is around 9–12 months with conventional cytotoxic agents. Considering this suboptimal outcome, which is induced despite of medical treatment, new therapeutic strategies would be urgently needed. The ultimate goal of precision medicine is to identify specific molecular alterations that permit considering effective targeted drug(s). Germline BRCA mutations occur in 10–20% of TNBC patients while somatic mutations occur in 3–5% of them. Alterations in the homologous recombination (HR) system are typical of BRCA mutant tumors, but can also be identified in tumors that do not carry this mutation, defining a subgroup of patients referred to as BRCAness. In this review, we focus on the role of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) as both predictive and prognostic factor in different settings of TNBC patients treated with DNA damaging drugs and poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors.

3063 Background: Several studies showed that high baseline tumor size (BTS) is associated with worse outcomes in cancer patients treated with immunotherapy (IO). However, the prognostic impact of BTS for patients receiving targeted therapies (TT) remains uncertain. Methods: We collected clinical data for patients with solid tumors consecutively treated within early phase trials at our institution from 01/2014 to 04/2021. Treatments were categorized as IO-based (if any IO-agent was included) or TT-based (biomarker-matched or not). BTS was calculated as the sum of RECIST 1.1 baseline target lesions. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and objective-response rate (ORR) were compared between patients with high BTS (> median) and low BTS (≤median). Results: 444 patients were eligible for the analysis (220 IO, 151 TT biomarker-matched, 73 TT biomarker-unmatched). Median age was 56 years (interquartile range, IQR 48-64) and median BTS was 69 mm (IQR 40-100). Most represented tumor types were breast (49%), lung (9%), melanoma (5%) stomach, colorectal, head and neck and ovarian (4% each). Patients with low BTS were more often female (p < 0.001), had a better performance status (PS, p = 0.008), lower LDH (p < 0.001), lower neutrophile/lymphocyte ratio (NLR, p < 0.001) and higher albumin (p = 0.003). OS was significantly longer for patients with low BTS (16.6 vs 8.2 months, p < 0.001), including when restricting at those receiving IO (12 vs 7.5 months, p = 0.005). Among patients receiving TT, those with lower BTS experienced longer PFS (4.7 vs 3.1 months, p = 0.002) and OS (20.5 vs 9.9 months, p < 0.001) as compared with those with high BTS. However, BTS was only prognostic among patients receiving biomarker-matched TT, with improved PFS (6.2 vs 3.3 months, p < 0.001) and OS (21.2 vs 6.7 months, p < 0.001) in the low-BTS subgroup, despite a similar ORR (28% vs 22%, p = 0.57). BTS was instead not prognostic among patients receiving unmatched TT, with similar PFS (3.7 vs 4.4 months, p = 0.30), OS (19.3 vs 11.8 months, p = 0.20) and ORR (33% vs 28%, p = 0.78) in the two BTS groups. Multivariate analysis confirmed that BTS was independently associated with PFS (p = 0.03) and OS (p < 0.001) but not with ORR (p = 0.11), regardless of tumor site, treatment category, PS, NLR, sites of metastases and number of prior lines. Conclusions: Patients receiving biomarker-matched TT experience longer PFS and OS if having a lower BTS, whereas response rate is not affected by this variable. This difference may reflect the faster emergence of molecular mechanisms of resistance among patients with higher baseline burden. Lower BTS is also confirmed to be associated with longer survival among patients receiving experimental IO. BTS has instead no prognostic value among patients receiving unmatched TT.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized the cancer treatment with an approved efficacy in different solid tumors and hematologic malignancies. These agents are increasing the indication in cancer treatment, but can be associated with serious immune-related adverse effects (IRAEs). Dermatologic and gastrointestinal toxicities are the most common IRAE followed by endocrinopathies with a different time of occurrence. Rarely cases of gastrointestinal toxicities are observed almost 2 years after initiation of the therapy. In this review we focus on liver toxicity related to these immunotherapeutic agents for which the largest amount of safety data is available. The management of drug-induced liver toxicity is very complicated and in same cases may take a long period of time to be resolved. A prompt recognition of liver IRAEs and an appropriate management of this event, requiring close collaboration with other specialist figures, could improve its treatment with evident implication on the efficacy of the therapy.

Background: Early phase clinical trials often represent a therapeutical opportunity for cancer patients (pts). However, high logistic commitment is demanded for participation. Here we explore the COVID-19 related risk during the pandemic for pts enrolled in clinical trials compared to pts receiving standard treatments. Methods: We retrospectively assessed the incidence of COVID-19 in pts treated in our Department from March 2020 to April 2021. Pts were divided into two groups;those enrolled in phase I/II clinical trials (A) and those being treated with standard therapies (B). Logistical (telemedicine and drug home-delivery), as well as clinical, characteristics of susceptibility to COVID-19 and number of events (SARS-CoV2 infections) were collected. The number of teleconsultations and COVID-19 events among the two groups were compared through Fisher’s exact test. Results: 115 pts were evaluated: 36 pts (31%) in A and 79 pts (69%) in B. Pts in A were younger, with a median age of 55 years (range 39-77) compared to 62 years (range 31-83) in B. Performance status (PS, ECOG) was similarly distributed: 0 (A 78%, B 83%), 1-2 (A 22%, B 17%). The median of previous treatment was 1 in A (range 0-9) and 2 (range 0-14) in B. The majority of the pts had at least one comorbidity in both groups (A: 72% and B: 83%). None of the pts had pulmonary comorbidity in A and 6% in B. Obesity was similarly distributed (A 11%, B 14%). The mean of monthly scheduled accesses was 1,5 in both groups. However, teleconsultation and delivery of oral cancer treatments at home were given, at least on one occasion, to only 6% of pts in A compared to 43% in B (p

RET (rearranged during transfection) gene encodes a receptor tyrosine kinase essential for many physiologic functions, but RET aberrations are involved in many pathologies. While RET loss-of-function mutations are associated with congenital disorders like Hirschsprung disease and CAKUT, RET gain-of-function mutations and rearrangements are critical drivers of tumor growth and proliferation in many different cancers. RET-altered (RET+) tumors have been hitherto targeted with multikinase inhibitors (MKI) having anti-RET activities, but they inhibit other kinase targets more potently and show limited clinical activities. The lack of target specificity and consequently increased side effects, responsible for dose reduction and drug discontinuation, are critical limitations of MKIs in the clinics. New selective RET inhibitors, selpercatinib and pralsetinib, are showing promising activities, improved response rates, and more favorable toxicity profiles in early clinical trials. This review critically discusses the oncogenic activation of RET and its role in different kinds of tumors, clinical features of RET+ tumors, clinically actionable genetic RET alterations and their diagnosis, and the available data and results of nonselective and selective targeting of RET.

Background Few real-world series on the efficacy and safety of anti-programmed cell death protein-1(PD-1)/programmed death ligand-1(PD-L1)–based therapy are available in molecularly unselected patients with poor performance status (PS) and specific types of advanced cancers, because such populations are typically excluded from clinical trials due to poor life expectancy and risk of toxicity. Materials and Methods This multicenter retrospective case series included patients with microsatellite instability (MSI)-high metastatic cancers with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) PS of 2 or 3 not related to comorbidities receiving anti-PD-1 with or without anti-CTLA-4 therapy after failure of at least one prior treatment line. Results We included 27 patients with six diverse tumor types: colorectal (n = 18), gastric (n = 5), biliary tract, pancreatic, small bowel, and endometrial cancers (n = 1 each). Baseline ECOG PS was 2 (74%) or 3 (26%). Overall response rate was 33%, with six partial and three complete responses. Median time to response was 3.1, months and median duration of response was 16.9 months. Median progression-free survival was 3.4 months (95% CI: 2.3 to not evaluable), and 18-month overall survival was 50.8% (95% confidence interval, 32.7–78.8). Baseline variables were not associated with survival outcomes. ECOG PS 1 was reached by 52% of patients in a median time of 6 weeks, and ECOG PS 0 was reached by 30% of patients in a median time of 10 weeks. Conclusion In a high proportion of patients with MSI-high cancers and poor performance status related to end-stage disease, salvage immunotherapy can induce potentially long-lasting “Lazarus responses”. Immunotherapy decisions near the end-of-life should be carefully integrated with predictive biomarkers and with palliative care measures in the real-world setting. Implications for Practice In this retrospective cohort study of 27 pretreated patients with microsatellite instability (MSI)-high cancers and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or 3 not related to comorbidities, PD-1/PD-L1-based therapy induced a RECIST response in 33% of patients, with a median duration of 16.9 months, and an improvement of performance status in 52% of patients. MSI-high status can be used in clinical practice as a tumor-agnostic predictive biomarker to select critically ill patients with end-stage cancers for salvage immunotherapy.

Key Points Question Is combining the blood metabolomic signature of endometrial carcinoma with an ensemble machine learning algorithm a useful system for building a screening test for endometrial cancer? Findings In this diagnostic study that included 1550 postmenopausal women, the proposed screening test correctly identified all 16 women with endometrial cancer, with 2 false-positive results and 0 false-negative results. Meaning The results of this study suggest that the metabolomic profile of a blood sample could provide a noninvasive and accurate screening test with high sensitivity and specificity for endometrial cancer., This diagnostic test validates a metabolomics-based classification algorithm as a screening test for endometrial carcinoma., Importance Endometrial carcinoma (EC) is the most commonly diagnosed gynecologic cancer. Its early detection is advisable because 20% of women have advanced disease at the time of diagnosis. Objective To clinically validate a metabolomics-based classification algorithm as a screening test for EC. Design, Setting, and Participants This diagnostic study enrolled 2 cohorts. A multicenter prospective cohort, with 50 cases (postmenopausal women with EC; International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage I-III and grade G1-G3) and 70 controls (no EC but matched on age, years from menopause, tobacco use, and comorbidities), was used to train multiple classification models. The accuracy of each trained model was then used as a statistical weight to produce an ensemble machine learning algorithm for testing, which was validated with a subsequent prospective cohort of 1430 postmenopausal women. The study was conducted at the San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d’Aragona University Hospital of Salerno (Italy) and Lega Italiana per la Lotta contro i Tumori clinic in Avellino (Italy). Data collection was conducted from January 2018 to February 2019, and analysis was conducted from January to March 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures The presence or absence of EC based on evaluation of the blood metabolome. Metabolites were extracted from dried blood samples from all participants and analyzed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. A confusion matrix was used to summarize test results. Performance indices included sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and accuracy. Confirmation or exclusion of EC in women with a positive test result was by means of hysteroscopy. Participants with negative results were followed up 1 year after enrollment to investigate the appearance of EC signs. Results The study population consisted of 1550 postmenopausal women. The mean (SD) age was 68.2 (11.7) years for participants with no EC in the training cohort, 69.4 (13.8) years for women with EC in the training cohort, and 59.7 (7.7) years for women in the validation cohort. Application of the ensemble machine learning to the validation cohort resulted in 16 true-positives, 2 false-positives, and 0 false-negatives, and it correctly classified more than 99% of samples. Disease prevalence was 1.12% (16 of 1430). Conclusions and Relevance In this study, dried blood metabolomic profile was used to assess the presence or absence of EC in postmenopausal women not receiving hormonal therapy with greater than 99% accuracy.

Breast cancer (BC) remains the most frequently diagnosed cancer and the most common cause of cancer death among women of all races worldwide. Over 80% of BC cases are hormone receptor (HR)-positive, comprised of luminal A and luminal B per molecular subtypes, imposing an urgent need to fully understand the mechanisms behind progression. Ribociclib is a selective cycline-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor. A phase 1 and a phase 3 trial have established a definitive role of ribociclib as frontline in the treatment of endocrine-sensitive advanced BC. Areas covered: Herein, the authors provide an overview of the data on ribociclib covering all aspects of the drug from its pharmacokinetics to efficacy and safety. The authors also provide their perspectives for the future. Expert opinion: Ribociclib is offering an opportunity to explore a new compound at the crossroads of different molecular activity and cell targets, which focus on endocrine-resistance reversal in multiple settings including early BC. Moreover, its activity against different subtypes of BC is being studied as is its immune-modulating effect. One cautionary note is that, in a market of concomitant similar competitors, a financial discussion will be mandatory.

BackgroundT-cell immunoreceptor with immunoglobulin and immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory domains (TIGIT), and costimulatory receptor CD226 competitively bind 2 ligands, CD155 and CD112, which are expressed by tumor cells and antigen-presenting cells in the tumor microenvironment.1 2 Dual TIGIT/programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) blockade increased tumor antigen-specific CD8+ T-cell expansion and function in vitro and promoted potent antitumor response in vivo.3 4 TIGIT/PD-1 dual blockade using a TIGIT monoclonal antibody (mAb) with intact Fc produced clinical responses in advanced cancer.5 SEA-TGT is an investigational, human, nonfucosylated mAb directed against TIGIT. SEA-TGT binds to TIGIT, blocking inhibitory checkpoint signals directed at T cells. SEA-TGT enhances binding to activating FcγRIIIa and decreases binding to inhibitory FcγRIIb; this depletes immunosuppressive regulatory T cells and amplifies naive and memory T cells, potentially augmenting PD-1 inhibition effects. Preclinically, at suboptimal doses, SEA-TGT plus anti-PD-1 mAbs had superior antitumor activity than either agent alone.6MethodsSafety and antitumor activity of SEA TGT in ~377 adults (≥18 years) will be evaluated in this phase 1, multicenter, open-label, dose-escalation/expansion study. Part A will assess the safety/tolerability of SEA TGT to determine maximum tolerated and recommended doses. Part B will assess the safety and antitumor activity of the recommended dose in disease-specific expansion cohorts. Part C will assess SEA-TGT plus sasanlimab in dose-expansion cohorts after an initial safety run-in. Patients with histologically/cytologically confirmed relapsed/refractory/progressive metastatic solid tumors including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), gastric/gastroesophageal junction carcinoma, cutaneous melanoma, bladder, cervical, ovarian or triple-negative breast cancer, or selected lymphomas will be eligible for Parts A and B. Part C will enroll patients with histologically confirmed advanced NSCLC (high [tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥50%] and low [TPS=1–49%] PD ligand 1 [PD-L1] expression), cutaneous melanoma, and HNSCC without previous anti–PD-1/PD-L1 therapy exposure. SEA TGT will be administered on Day 1 of 21-day cycles.Laboratory abnormalities, adverse events, dose-limiting toxicities, and dose-level safety and activity are primary endpoints. Secondary endpoints are objective response (OR) and complete response (CR) rates, duration of OR/CR, progression-free survival, overall survival, pharmacokinetics (PK), and antidrug antibodies. Exploratory analysis will include pharmacodynamics (PD), PK/PD relationships, biomarkers, and resistance to SEA-TGT. This trial is recruiting in Europe and North America.Trial RegistrationNCT04254107ReferencesBlake SJ, Dougall WC, Miles JJ, et al. Molecular pathways: Targeting CD96 and TIGIT for cancer immunotherapy. Clin Cancer Res 2016;22(21):5183–5188.Chauvin JM, Zarour HM. TIGIT in cancer immunotherapy. J ImmunoTher Cancer 2020;8:e000957.Johnston RJ, Comps-Agrar L, Hackney J, et al. The immunoreceptor TIGIT regulates antitumor and antiviral CD8+ T cell effector function. Cancer Cell 2014;26(6):923–937.Chauvin JM, Pagliano O, Fourcade J, et al. TIGIT and PD-1 impair tumor antigen-specific CD8+ T cells in melanoma patients. J Clin Invest 2015;125(5):2046–2058.Rodriguez-Abreu D, Johnson ML, Hussein MA, et al. Primary analysis of a randomized, double-blind, phase 2 study of the anti-TIGIT antibody tiragolumab (tira) plus atezolizumab (atezo) versus placebo plus atezo as first-line (1L) treatment in patients with PD-L1-selected NSCLC (CITYSCAPE). J Clin Oncol 2020;38(15 suppl):9503.Smith A, Zeng W, Lucas S, et al. Poster 1583. SEA-TGT is an empowered anti-TIGIT antibody that displays superior combinatorial activity with several therapeutic agents. Presented at: American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting; April 9–14, 2021; Virtual Meeting.Ethics ApprovalInstitutional review boards or independent ethics committees of participating sites approved the trial, which will be conducted in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki and International Conference on Harmonisation Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice. All patients will provide written informed consent.

87 Background: Anti-PD-(L)1-based therapy yielded unprecedented efficacy in patients with MSI-high mCRC. A relevant proportion of subjects may achieve long-term disease control when receiving ICIs, particularly anti-PD-1 plus anti-CTLA-4 combo. However, some patients still experience treatment refractoriness or short-term clinical benefit. Methods: We analyzed data of 163 patients with MSI-high mCRC treated with anti-PD-1 +/- anti-CTLA-4 agents. The endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); multivariable analyses were performed using a cure model (Othus et al, CCR 2012), which allows to test which factors, including ICI type, could identify patients achieving long-term disease control. To account for biases consistent with non-random ICI assignment, we estimated a propensity score (covariates: ECOG PS, age, sex, primary tumor location, its resection, adjuvant treatment, synchronous presentation of mets, mucinous histotype, RAS/BRAF status, n. prior treatment lines, previous chemo, n. metastatic sites, presence of peritoneal, lung, liver, bone, brain, nodal mets), and then in the cure model we applied an inverse-probability-of-treatment-weight (IPTW) based on propensity score. A beforehand variable selection was operated using a random survival forest (RSF) model (RSF covariates: all the propensity score covariates plus ICI line and ICI type, platelets count (PLT), NLR, LDH), where we introduced a weight system in order to adjust variable selection net of ICI type. Results: RFS selected 5 variables: ICI type, ECOG PS, NLR, PLT and N. prior lines, the combination of which allowed to estimate the cure probability: the higher the probability the greater the chance of achieving long-term disease control. The Table shows the odds ratio estimates, defining the chance of being “cured” according to the values of the selected variables. ICI type was significantly associated with long-term disease control: patients treated with anti CTLA-4-combo achieved the highest chance of being cured, 3.41 times greater than the chance of patients treated with anti PD-1 mono. The median cure probability was as higher as 70.1% (IQR: 51.9-81.0%) with CTLA-4-combo vs 34.8% (IQR: 18.4-51.9%) with anti-PD-1 mono; the probability within treatment groups was varying according to ECOG PS, NLR, PLT and n. prior lines. Conclusions: Based on 5 variables including the ICI treatment type, a nomogram was built in order to estimate the cure probability in patients with MSI-high mCRC and potentially assist clinicians in their clinical practice. [Table: see text]

BACKGROUND Biliary tract cancer (BTC) is a rare and lethal disease with few therapeutic options. Preclinical data suggest that the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathway could be involved in its progression. METHODS This open-label, randomized phase 2 trial recruited chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced BTC displaying a wild-type (WT) KRAS status. Patients were randomized to gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) and oxaliplatin (100 mg/m2) with (arm A) or without (arm B) panitumumab (6 mg/kg) for up to 12 cycles. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) analyzed in an intention-to-treat fashion. RESULTS Eighty-nine patients (45 in arm A and 44 in arm B) were enrolled between June 2010 and September 2013. After a median follow-up of 10.1 months, the median PFS was 5.3 months (95% confidence interval, 3.3-7.2 months) in arm A and 4.4 months (95% confidence interval, 2.6-6.2 months) in arm B (P = .27). No survival differences were observed: the median overall survival was 9.9 months in arm A and 10.2 months in arm B (P = .42). In a subgroup analysis, no differences in PFS according to the site of the primary tumor were observed; patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma treated with panitumumab may have had a survival benefit in comparison with the control group (15.1 vs 11.8 months, P = .13). As for safety, skin toxicity was the main adverse event in arm A (80% of the patients). A higher incidence of diarrhea (55.5% vs 31.8%), mucositis (22.2% vs 13.6%), and constipation (24.4% vs 15.9%) was seen in arm A. CONCLUSIONS These results confirm the marginal role of anti-EGFR therapy even for WT KRAS–selected BTC. Cancer 2016;122:574–581. © 2015 American Cancer Society.

Tumorigenesis is a complex and dynamic process involving different cellular and non-cellular elements composed of tumor microenvironment (TME). The interaction of TME with cancer cells is responsible for tumor development, progression and drug resistance. TME consists of non malignant cells of the tumor such as cancer associated fibroblasts (CAFs), endothelial cells and pericytes composing tumor vasculature, immune and inflammatory cells, bone marrow derived cells, and the extracellular matrix (ECM) establishing a complex cross-talk with tumor. These interactions contribute towards proliferation and invasion of the tumor by producing growth factors, chemokines and matrix-degrading enzymes. ECM is a complex system containing macromolecules with distinctive physical, biochemical and biomechanical properties. During tumorigenesis this system is deregulated favoring the generation of tumorigenic microenvironment enhancing tumor-associated angiogenesis and inflammation. An important step of anticancer treatment is the identification of the biological alterations present in TME in order to target these key molecular players. Multitargeted approaches, providing a simultaneous inhibition of TME components, may offer a more efficient way to treat cancer. In this manuscript we overview the function of each components of TME and the treatments targeting the key players.

Purpose: We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of metformin for treating patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer and to identify endocrine and metabolic phenotypic features or tumor molecular markers associated with sensitivity to metformin antineoplastic action. Experimental Design: We designed an open-label, randomized, phase II trial to assess the efficacy of adding metformin to a standard systemic therapy with cisplatin, epirubicin, capecitabine, and gemcitabine (PEXG) in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Patients ages 18 years or older with metastatic pancreatic cancer were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive PEXG every 4 weeks in combination or not with 2 g oral metformin daily. The primary endpoint was 6-months progression-free survival (PFS-6) in the intention-to-treat population. Results: Between August 2010 and January 2014, we randomly assigned 60 patients to receive PEXG with (n = 31) or without metformin (n = 29). At the preplanned interim analysis, the study was ended for futility. PFS-6 was 52% [95% confidence interval (CI), 33–69] in the control group and 42% (95% CI, 24–59) in the metformin group (P = 0.61). Furthermore, there was no difference in disease-free survival and overall survival between groups. Despite endocrine metabolic modifications induced by metformin, there was no correlation with the outcome. Single-nucleotide polymorphism rs11212617 predicted glycemic response, but not tumor response to metformin. Gene expression on tumor tissue did not predict tumor response to metformin. Conclusions: Addition of metformin at the dose commonly used in diabetes did not improve outcome in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer treated with standard systemic therapy. Clin Cancer Res; 22(5); 1076–85. ©2015 AACR. See related commentary by Yang and Rustgi, p. 1031

Background: Malignant mesothelioma (MM) is an aggressive disease that is diagnosed mostly in locally advanced or metastatic stage. In this condition chemotherapy with the combination cisplatin and pemetrexed or ralitrexed represents the standard treatment as supported by a phase III study. However, chemotherapy has very limited effect on the improvement of survival of patients and very few of the MM patients survive more than 2 years. A better understanding of molecular mechanisms and pathways involved in angiogenesis in MM is the basis for the development of new drugs targeted against these pathways responsible for the proliferation and survival of tumor cells. Objective: This review discusses the role of angiogenic factors in tumourigenesis with a particular focus on MM and it summarizes the results of clinical trials on the drugs targeting angiogenic pathways in MM. Methods: We have used original research articles, abstracts and oral presentations from ASCO (American Society of Clinical Oncology) and the website of clinical trials http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov Results/Conclusions: This review summarizes the results of antiangiogenic agents under evaluation in clinical trials. A better understanding of the angiogenic pathways activated in MM will hopefully provide new therapeutic options for these patients in the future.

Malignant pleural mesothelioma is a highly invasive tumor arising from the mesothelial cells of serosal surfaces. Several chemotherapeutic agents have been tested for the treatment of this disease and doublet cisplatin with antifolates has been demonstrated to have significant efficacy in Phase III studies. However, the benefit of these treatments remains poor and the median survival time of patients is low, ranging between 9 and 17 months. Targeted therapies are being developed in oncology and emerging evidence suggests that they offer disease control in several tumors. This article reviews the knowledge on the malignant pleural mesothelioma molecular pathway and focuses on results of clinical trials conducted on this devastating disease.

Standard treatments for nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC), such as surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, often lead to disappointing results. Unfortunately, also the various immunotherapeutic approaches so far tested have not produced satisfactory results to be widely applied in the clinical practice. However, the recent development of new immunomodulatory agents may open promising therapeutic options. This paper focuses on PF3512676, lenalidomide, and NGR-TNF, that is, drugs belonging to three different classes of immunomodulatory agents, that are also capable to affect tumor blood vessels with different mechanisms, and discusses the potential role of such agents in NSCLC treatment strategy.

Targeted delivery of TNF to tumour vessels has been achieved by coupling this protein with the CNGRC peptide, an aminopeptidase N (CD13) ligand that targets the tumour neovasculature.The so-called NGR-TNF enhances the penetration of chemotherapeutic drugs in tumours and improves their efficacy. Here we describe a case of hepatocarcinoma which showed response to NGR-hTNF in combination with doxorubicin, clinically proving this promising strategy.

Advanced biliary tract adenocarcinoma (BTA) is a rare tumor with a poor prognosis. Since no standard salvage chemotherapy regimen exists, we explored the activity of capecitabine alone or combined with mitomycin C. Patients aged 18-75 years and with KPS > 50, with pathological diagnosis of BTA stratified based on site and stage of disease, were randomized to receive capecitabine 2000 mg/m(2) day 1-14 alone (ARM A) or in combination with mitomycin C 6 mg/m(2) day 1 (ARM B) as second-line therapy. Cycles were repeated in both arms every 3 weeks. Tumor assessment was performed every 2 months. The primary endpoint was the probability of being progression free at 6 months (PFS-6) from treatment start. According to the Fleming design, the study aimed to enroll 26 pts per arm. An exploratory endpoint was to assess thymidylate synthase (TS) and thymidine phosphorylase (TP) expression, as biomarkers predictive for clinical outcomes of capecitabine treatment. Between October 2011 and 2013, 57 metastatic pts were enrolled: ARM A/B 28/29. Accordingly, 55 (26/29) pts were assessable for the primary endpoint: 2 (8 %) ARM A and 3 (10 %) ARM B pts were PFS-6. Main G3-4 toxicities were: hand-foot syndrome and transaminitis in 4/0 %, and thrombocytopenia, diarrhea and fatigue in 0/3 % of pts. No statistically significant correlation was found between TS or TP expression and pts' outcome. Since capecitabine yielded a disappointing outcome and the addition of mitomycin C did not improve the results, new therapeutic strategies need to be explored to improve survival in this disease setting.

PURPOSE: No standard salvage chemotherapy has been identified for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPA), and there is an urgent need for active agents against this disease. This phase II trial explored the activity of trabectedin in mPA progressing after gemcitabine-based first-line chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients with gemcitabine-resistant disease received trabectedin 1.3 mg/m(2) as a 3-h intravenous continuous infusion every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity or for a maximum of 6 months. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival rate at 6 months (PFS-6). Since trabectedin modulates the production of selected inflammatory mediators, this study also aimed to identify inflammatory biomarkers predictive for response to trabectedin. RESULTS: Between February 2011 and February 2012, 25 patients received trabectedin. PFS-6 was 4%, median PFS 1.9 months (range 0.8-7.4), and median overall survival 5.2 months (range 1.1-24.3). Grade >2 toxicity consisted of neutropenia in 44%of patients, febrile neutropenia and thrombocytopenia both in 12%, anemia in 8%, fatigue in 12%, and AST and ALT increase in 8 and 4%, respectively. Trabectedin was shown to modulate the production of inflammatory mediators, and at disease progression, levels of a subgroup of cytokines/chemokines were modified. Furthermore, tissue analysis identified 30 genes associated with better prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: Although it has shown some ability to modulate inflammatory process, single-agent trabectedin had no activity as salvage therapy for mPA.

Background: The role of second-line chemotherapy (CT) is not established in advanced biliary tract cancer (aBTC). We investigated the outcome of aBTC patients treated with second-line CT and devised a prognostic model. Methods: Baseline clinical and laboratory data of 300 consecutive aBTC patients were collected and association with overall survival (OS) was investigated by multivariable Cox models. Results: The following parameters resulted independently associated with longer OS: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 (P

New strategies to prolong disease control warrant investigation in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. This open-label, randomised, multi-centre phase II trial explored the role of maintenance sunitinib after first-line chemotherapy in this setting.Patients with pathologic diagnosis of metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, performance status50%, no progression after 6 months of chemotherapy were centrally randomised by an independent contract research organisation, which was also responsible for data collection and monitoring, to observation (arm A) or sunitinib at 37.5mg daily until progression or a maximum of 6 months (arm B). The primary outcome measure was the probability of being progression-free at 6 months (PFS-6) from randomisation. Assuming P0 = 10%; P1 = 30%, α .10; β .10, the target accrual was 26 patients per arm.28 per arm were randomised. One arm B patient had kidney cancer and was excluded. Sunitinib was given for a median of 91 days (7-186). Main grade 3-4 toxicity was thrombocytopenia, neutropenia and hand-foot syndrome (12%), diarrhoea 8%. In arm A versus B, PFS-6 was 3.6% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0-10.6%) and 22.2% (95% CI: 6.2-38.2%; P0.01); 2 y overall survival was 7.1% (95% CI: 0-16.8%) and 22.9% (95% CI: 5.8-40.0%; P = 0.11), stable disease 21.4% and 51.9% (P = 0.02).This is the first randomised trial on maintenance therapy in metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The primary end-point was fulfilled and 2 y overall survival was remarkably high, suggesting that maintenance sunitinib is promising and should be further explored in this patient population.

Biliary tract cancer is a rare malignant tumor. Accordingly, to perform prospective and randomized trials is difficult and the knowledge of its natural history and optimal management remains limited. Chemotherapy is commonly used to improve the outcome and to delay tumor progression in advanced disease. Only recently, cisplatin-gemcitabine combination was identified as the new standard first-line therapy. Despite the outcome improvement, disease progression is a constant and approximately half of patients failing upfront treatment maintain a good performance status and are willing to undergo further treatment. No standard salvage chemotherapy regimen has been identified yet. Experiences of salvage therapy in advanced biliary tract cancer are sparse and yielded disappointing results. Well designed multi-institutional randomized trials are warranted to clarify the role and the activity of a second-line therapy.

Background Extraneural dissemination of oligodendroglioma is rare. Cases of breast metastases have never been described in the literature. Case reports We report the first two cases of young women with initial diagnosis of anaplastic oligodendroglioma who experienced mammary gland metastases and a review of the literature. Results Immunohistochemical analysis performed on material from both primary and metastatic sites did not allow to draw any conclusion on possible etiopathogenetic hypothesis. A review of literature yielded 35 cases of extracranial metastatic oligodendroglioma from 1989 to 2012. Conclusion Though rare, extracranial dissemination from oligodendroglioma may occur not only in long surviving heavily pre-treated patients. The review of literature and these two cases suggest that spread is primarily to bone and then from bone to other organs through hematogenous route mostly due to leptomeningeal or dura mater invasion. Chemotherapy regimens similar to those commonly used for non metastatic oligodendroglioma are recommended for patients with good performance status.

Summary Background Pancreatic cancer is among the deadliest tumors. Due to intrinsic chemo- and radio-resistance, surgical resection remains the only chance for cure. However surgery alone is unable to considerably improve survival and complementary chemotherapy and radiotherapy in a multimodal approach have been tested. Adjuvant chemotherapy yielded a modest outcome improvement, whereas the use of adjuvant chemoradiation is highly controversial. In this scenario, the neoadjuvant approach has a strong theoretical rationale, but limited information on the efficacy of this strategy is available. Materials and methods This review critically overviews the current knowledge, the rationale, the available data and information on neoadjuvant treatment in resectable pancreatic cancer. Results The very early systemic dissemination of pancreatic cancer endorses the rationale for an up-front use of systemic therapy. However, evidence collected so far depends on retrospective data, small case series that did not balance the different characteristics of patients suitable for surgery before or after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusion Currently there is no straightforward evidence to support the routine clinical use of this strategy. Only a properly designed randomized trial testing combination chemotherapy regimens selected on the basis of their efficacy and activity against metastatic disease can address this issue.

A randomised multi-centre phase II trial explored the role of MS in pts with MPA without progressive disease (PD) after induction chemotherapy (CT), using an observation only group (O) as calibration arm [Reni et al. Proc ASCO 2012]. The aim of this present study was to identify genetic polymorphisms related to pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of sunitinib that are associated with outcome. Adult pts with pathologic diagnosis of MPA, performance status (PS) >50%, no PD after 6 months of CT were randomized to O (arm A) or MS at 37.5 mg daily until PD or a maximum of 6 months (arm B). Functional polymorphisms of 6 genes involved in sunitinib activity, metabolism and transport (VEGFA, VEGFR-2, CYP3A5, CYP1A1, ABCB1, ABCG2) were studied in genomic DNA from baseline blood samples, using PCR Taqman®-probes-based assays. Associations of genotypes with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated by Log-rank test. Genotyping was successfully performed in all the DNA samples of 43 consenting pts of 55 enrolled in the trial (78%; arm A/B: 83%/73%; p = 0.39). Significantly longer OS was observed in 7 pts harbouring the ABCB1 3435TT genotype (group-1; median OS 20 months) as compared to 36 pts with 3435CC/CT genotype (group-2; median OS 7 months; p = 0.027). Median OS was 26 months in 4 group-1 arm B pts, 7 months in 15 group-2 arm B pts (p = 0.12); 16 months in 3 group-1 arm A pts and 9 months in 21 group-2 arm A pts (p = 0.67). No OS difference was observed in 28 pts harbouring the VEGFA -634GC-CC genotype (group-3; median OS 10 months) as compared to 15 pts with -634GG genotype (group-4; median OS 8 months; p = 0.15). However, median OS was 13 months in 13 group-3 arm B pts, 6 months in 6 group-4 arm B pts (p = 0.016); 9 months in 15 group 3 arm A pts and 11 months in 9 group 4 arm A pts (p = 0.67). These results suggest that polymorphisms of genes involved in expression of the main ligand for VEGFR2 (VEGFA 634G > C) and of efflux transporters (ABCB1 3435C > T) are promising candidates as predictive marker for selecting pts with MPA who may benefit of MS. Given the small sample size of these analyses, a larger confirmatory trial is necessary and appears worthwhile. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Purpose PEFG regimen (P:cisplatin, E:epirubicin, F:5-fluorouracil, G:gemcitabine) significantly prolonged progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA) with respect to standard gemcitabine. The current trial was aimed at assessing whether the replacement of E with docetaxel (D) may improve 6 months PFS (PFS6). Methods Chemo-naive patients with stage III or metastatic PA received P (30 mg/m(2) day 1 and 15), G (800 mg/m(2) day 1 and 15), and capecitabine (1,250 mg/m(2)/day days 1-28, without a break) and were randomized to receive either D at 25-30 mg/m(2) day 1 and 15 (arm A: PDXG regimen) or E at 30 mg/m(2) day 1 and 15 (arm B: PEXG regimen). Cycles were repeated every 28 days for a maximum of 6 months. The Fleming design was used to calculate the sample size on the probability of being PFS6. Assuming P0 = 40% and P1 = 60%, alpha = 0.05 and beta = 0.10; the study was to enroll 52 patients per arm. Results Between July 2005 and September 2008, 105 patients were enrolled, stratified by stage and randomized. Patients' characteristics were (A/B) the following: median age 61/59, PS > 70 92/88%, metastatic disease 66/65%. PFS6 was 58%, and median OS was 11 months in both arms. A partial response was observed in 60/37% of patients. Main per cycle G3-4 toxicity was the following: neutropenia 4/13%, thrombocytopenia 2/4%, anemia 4/4%, and fatigue 6/3%. Conclusions The inclusion of D instead of E yielded more objective response and less G3-4 neutropenia but did not improve PFS and OS. The present trial confirms the relevant impact on outcome of advanced PA of 4-drug regimens. PURPOSE: PEFG regimen (P:cisplatin, E:epirubicin, F:5-fluorouracil, G:gemcitabine) significantly prolonged progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA) with respect to standard gemcitabine. The current trial was aimed at assessing whether the replacement of E with docetaxel (D) may improve 6 months PFS (PFS6). METHODS: Chemo-naive patients with stage III or metastatic PA received P (30 mg/m(2) day 1 and 15), G (800 mg/m(2) day 1 and 15), and capecitabine (1,250 mg/m(2)/day days 1-28, without a break) and were randomized to receive either D at 25-30 mg/m(2) day 1 and 15 (arm A: PDXG regimen) or E at 30 mg/m(2) day 1 and 15 (arm B: PEXG regimen). Cycles were repeated every 28 days for a maximum of 6 months. The Fleming design was used to calculate the sample size on the probability of being PFS6. Assuming P0 = 40% and P1 = 60%, α = 0.05 and β = 0.10; the study was to enroll 52 patients per arm. RESULTS: Between July 2005 and September 2008, 105 patients were enrolled, stratified by stage and randomized. Patients' characteristics were (A/B) the following: median age 61/59, PS >70 92/88%, metastatic disease 66/65%. PFS6 was 58%, and median OS was 11 months in both arms. A partial response was observed in 60/37% of patients. Main per cycle G3-4 toxicity was the following: neutropenia 4/13%, thrombocytopenia 2/4%, anemia 4/4%, and fatigue 6/3%. CONCLUSIONS: The inclusion of D instead of E yielded more objective response and less G3-4 neutropenia but did not improve PFS and OS. The present trial confirms the relevant impact on outcome of advanced PA of 4-drug regimens.

More than half of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA) are candidates for further treatment when they experience upfront treatment failure.Patients with gemcitabine-resistant PA, age76 years and Karnofski performance status (KPS)50 were treated with a XELIRI or FOLFIRI regimen until progressive disease or a maximum of six months. As this was an observational study, no statistical design was performed.Between July 2007 and December 2009, 34 patients (median age 60 years; median KPS 90) were treated with XELIRI (26) or FOLFIRI (8) regimen. Grade2 toxicity consisted of neutropenia in 9% of patients, anemia and fatigue in 3% and hand-foot syndrome in 12%. Median progression-free survival was two months (range 1-4). Maximum response was stable disease in four patients (12%). Median survival was 4.2 (range 1-15) months.Fluoropyrimidine and irinotecan combination does not seem to have any role in the treatment of gemcitabine-resistant PA.

Angiogenesis is considered one of the key mechanisms of tumour growth and survival. Therefore it represents an ideal pharmaceutical target. Many antiangiogenic agents have been developed so far in several solid tumours and also in breast cancer. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEFG) is the main target and both monoclonal antibodies and small molecules belonging to the tyrosine kinase inhibitors directed against VEGF(R) have been developed. Some other therapeutic approaches have shown to exert some antiangiogenic activity, such as hormonal agents, metronomic chemotherapy, bisphosphonates and others. In this paper we provide an introduction of the current data supporting the angiogenesis in breast cancer and a review of the most relevant antiagiogenic therapies which have been investigated so far.