Search

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported. In the investigator-sponsored randomized phase II NIVAHL trial for early-stage unfavorable classical Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), two schedules of four cycles of nivolumab, doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine followed by 30 Gy involved-site radiotherapy resulted in high complete remission rates and an unprecedented 1-year progression-free survival in 109 patients. In this article, we report the preplanned final analysis conducted three years after the registration of the last patient including long-term safety results. No survival events were observed since the primary analysis, and after a median follow-up (FU) of 41 months, the overall survival was 100% in both treatment groups. The progression-free survival was 98% and 100% in the sequential and concomitant nivolumab, doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine treatment groups, respectively. At last FU, the mean forced expiratory pressure in one second was 95.5% (standard deviation 12.7%), the mean diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide adjusted for hemoglobin was 82.8% (standard deviation 15.4%), and the left ventricular ejection fraction was in the normal range in 95% of patients. Hypothyroidism requiring long-term medication occurred in 15% of patients, who were nearly exclusively female (87%). No second primary malignancies occurred, and no patient required corticosteroid treatment at last FU. Patient-reported normalized global quality-of-life score measured by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 improved over time. This preplanned FU analysis of the largest anti–programmed death protein 1 HL first-line trial to date confirms the outstanding efficacy and relatively favorable safety profile of this therapeutic approach.

The optimal first-line treatment for nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) diagnosed in early stages is largely undefined. We therefore analyzed 100 NLPHL patients (early-stage favorable: 85 patients; early-stage unfavorable: 15 patients) treated within the randomized HD16 (early-stage favorable) and HD17 (early-stage unfavorable) studies. These studies investigated the omission of consolidation radiotherapy (RT) in patients with a negative interim positron emission tomography (iPET) (defined as a Deauville score < 3) at the end of chemotherapy (HD16: 2xABVD; HD17: 2xBEACOPPescalated plus 2xABVD). Patients with NLPHL treated within the HD16 and HD17 studies had 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates of 90.3% (95%-CI: 83.8%-96.7%) and 92.9% (95%-CI: 79.4%-100%), respectively. Thus, the 5-year PFS did not differ significantly from patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma treated within the same studies (p=0.88 for HD16; p=0.50 for HD17). Patients with early-stage favorable NLPHL who had a negative iPET after 2xABVD and did not undergo consolidation RT (n=25) tended to have a worse PFS than iPET-negative patients who received consolidation RT (n=21) (5-year PFS: 83% (95%-CI: 67.8%-98.2%) vs 100%; p=0.05). Overall, there were 10 cases of NLPHL recurrence (HD16: 9 patients; HD17: 1 patient). However, no NLPHL patient died during follow-up. Hence, the 5-year overall survival rate was 100%. Taken together, contemporary HL-directed treatment approaches result in excellent outcomes for patients with newly diagnosed early-stage NLPHL and thus represent valid treatment options. In patients with early-stage favorable NLPHL, consolidation RT appears necessary after 2xABVD to achieve the optimal disease control irrespective of the iPET result.

FGFR1 expression in cancer cell lines.

Detailed description of STS Cohort 1 including the clinical data and FGFR1 status.

Purpose: We sought to investigate the clinical response to MET inhibition in patients diagnosed with structural MET alterations and to characterize their functional relevance in cellular models.Experimental Design: Patients were selected for treatment with crizotinib upon results of hybrid capture–based next-generation sequencing. To confirm the clinical observations, we analyzed cellular models that express these MET kinase alterations.Results: Three individual patients were identified to harbor alterations within the MET receptor. Two patients showed genomic rearrangements, leading to a gene fusion of KIF5B or STARD3NL and MET. One patient diagnosed with an EML4-ALK rearrangement developed a MET kinase domain duplication as a resistance mechanism to ceritinib. All 3 patients showed a partial response to crizotinib that effectively inhibits MET and ALK among other kinases. The results were further confirmed using orthogonal cellular models.Conclusions: Crizotinib leads to a clinical response in patients with MET rearrangements. Our functional analyses together with the clinical data suggest that these structural alterations may represent actionable targets in lung cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res; 24(6); 1337–43. ©2017 AACR.

Soft-tissue sarcoma cohorts.

Detailed description of STS Cohort 2 including the clinical data and FGFR1 status.

Radiographic assessment of target lesions following BGJ398 treatment.

In several solid tumors, fibroblast activation protein (FAP) is overexpressed by cancer-associated fibroblasts in the tumor microenvironment. Preliminary evidence suggests that detection and staging are feasible with PET/CT imaging using [68Ga]-radiolabeled inhibitors of FAP also in cervical cancer (CC). Our study aims to explore the accuracy of [68Ga]Ga-fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI)-46 PET/CT and [18F]F-FDG PET/CT compared with histopathological results of surgical lymph node (LN) staging before primary chemoradiation.Seven consecutive women with treatment-naive and biopsy-proven locally advanced CC underwent both whole-body [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46- and [18F]F-FDG PET/CT, for imaging nodal staging before systematic laparoscopic lymphadenectomy of the pelvic and para-aortic region. Location and number of suspicious LNs in PET imaging were recorded and compared with the results of histopathological analysis, including immunohistochemical staining for FAP.All 7 patients had focal uptake above background in their tumor lesions in [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT. [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT showed a higher tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) in primary tumor as well as in LN metastasis. Median TBRmax values using liver were 32.02 and 5.15 for [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT and [18F]F-FDG PET/CT, respectively. Median TBRmax using blood pool was 18.45 versus 6.85 for [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT and [18F]F-FDG PET/CT, respectively. Higher TBR also applies for nodal metastasis: TBRmax was 14.55 versus 1.39 (liver) and 7.97 versus 1.8 (blood pool) for [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT and [18F]F-FDG PET/CT, respectively. Overall, [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT detected more lesions compared with [18F]F-FDG PET/CT. Following surgical staging, a total of 5 metastatic LNs could be pathologically confirmed, of which 2 and 4 were positive by [18F]F-FDG PET/CT and [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT, respectively.[68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT seems useful to improve detection of nodal metastasis in patients with CCs. Future studies should aim to compare [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT to surgical staging of pelvic and para-aortic LNs in patients with locally advanced CC.

Reinduction chemotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant (HDCT + ASCT) is second-line standard of care for transplant-eligible patients with relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (r/r cHL) but has a high failure rate. Because response to reinduction is predictive of the outcome after HDCT + ASCT, we aimed to improve the standard dexamethasone, high-dose cytarabine and cisplatinum (DHAP) reinduction regimen by addition of the oral mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor everolimus (everDHAP). Transplant-eligible patients aged 18–60 years with histologically confirmed r/r cHL were included in this experimental phase I/II trial. Everolimus (10 mg/day, determined in phase-I-part) was administered on day 0–13 of each DHAP cycle. From July 2014 to March 2018, 50 patients were recruited to the phase II everDHAP group; two were not evaluable, three discontinued due to toxicity. Randomization to a placebo group stopped in October 2015 due to poor recruitment after nine patients. The primary end-point of computed tomography (CT)-based complete remission (CR) after two cycles of everDHAP was expected to be ≥40%. With a CT-based CR rate of 27% (n = 12/45) after two cycles of everDHAP the trial did not meet the primary end-point. Adding everolimus to DHAP is thus feasible; however, the everDHAP regimen failed to show an improved efficacy.

Malignant lymphoma comprises a broad spectrum of diverse entities originating from different types of lymphocytes. In the last century, successive improvements of treatment possibilities have led to an continuous amelioration of patient prognosis from lethal outcome to high rates of disease control and long-term survivors. PET/CT-based imaging plays a key role in stratification of stage and treatment response. Especially for radiotherapy, an essential treatment modality for lymphoma patients, functional imaging and the reevaluation of disease activity after frontline chemotherapy has led to major improvements regarding size of treatment fields and toxicity. International expert groups like the International Lymphoma Radiation Oncology Group (ILROG) develop guidelines for the optimal use of imaging for treatment planning. The shift from uniform large-field treatment volumes to complex individual setups taking into account biological response-assessments based on functional imaging resulted in a further de-escalation of side effects and modernization of lymphoma treatment. This paper aims to summarize the use of FDG-PET-imaging for radiation therapy planning in malignant lymphoma in the context of historic and future developments, as well as associated limitations and challenges ahead. We will discuss the contemporary standard of care as recommended by international expert guidelines like the ILROG, the national comprehensive cancer network (NCCN), as well as the newly updated German S3-guidelines.

The short half-life of existing prostate-specificmembraneantigen (PSMA) tracers limits their time for internalization into tumor cells after injection, which is an essential prerequisite for robust detection of tumor lesions with low PSMA expression on PET/CT scans. Because of its longer half-life, the 89Zr-labeled ligand 89Zr-PSMA-DFO allows acquisition of PET scans up to 6 d after injection, thereby overcoming the above limitation. We investigated whether 89Zr-PSMA-DFO allowed more sensitive detection of weak PSMA-positive prostate cancer lesions. Methods: We selected 14 prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence who exhibited no PSMA-positive lesions on a PET scan acquired with existing PSMA tracers (68Ga-PSMA-11, 18F-JK-PSMA-7). Within 5 wk after the negative scan result, we obtained a second PSMA PET scan using 89Zr-PSMA-DFO (117 6 16 MBq, PET acquisition within 6 d of injection). Results: 89Zr-PSMADFO detected 15 PSMA-positive lesions in 8 of 14 patients, who had a PET-negative reading of their initial PET scans with existing tracers. In these 8 patients, the new scans revealed localized recurrence of disease (3/8), metastases in lymph nodes (3/8), or lesions at distant sites (2/8). On the basis of these results, patients received lesiontargeted radiotherapies (5/8), androgen deprivation therapies (2/8), or no therapy (1/8). The plausibility of 14 of 15 lesions was supported by histology, clinical follow-up after radiotherapy, or subsequent imaging. Furthermore, comparison of the 15 89Zr-PSMA-DFO–positive lesions with their correlates on the original PET scan revealed that established tracers exhibited mild accumulation in 7 of 15 lesions; however, contrast-to-noise ratios were too low for robust detection of these lesions (contrast-to-noise ratios, 2.4 6 3.7 for established tracers vs. 10.2 6 8.5 for89Zr-PSMA-DFO, P 5 0.0014). The SUVmax of the 15 89ZrPSMA-DFO–positive lesions (11.5 6 5.8) was significantly higher than the SUVmax on the original PET scans (4.7 6 2.8, P5 0.0001). Kidneys were the most exposed organ, with doses of 3.3 6 0.7 mGy/MBq. The effective dose was 0.15 6 0.04 mSv/MBq. Conclusion: In patients with weak PSMA expression, a longer period of time might be needed for ligand internalization than that offered by existing PSMA tracers to make lesions visible on PET/CT scans. Hence, 89ZrPSMA-DFO might be of significant benefit to patients in whom the search for weak PSMA-positive lesions is challenging. Radiation exposure should be weighed against the potential benefitof metastasis-directed therapy or salvage radiotherapy, which weinitiated in 36% (5/14) of our patients based on their 89Zr-PSMA-DFO PET scans.

In patients with relapse of classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) after autologous stem cell transplant, brentuximab vedotin and anti-PD1 treatment, the outcome is poor. To assess the efficacy of the bispecific anti-CD30/CD16A, NK-cell engaging antibody AFM13 and to select the optimal treatment schedule (arm A-C), we initiated a randomized two-stage phase II trial (NCT02321592). Due to slow recruitment, the trial was terminated after treatment of 25 patients. Treatment with AFM13 was well tolerated: only two treatment-associated serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported; all SAEs resolved completely. With an objective response rate (ORR) of 16.7% (1/5 in arm A, 1/11 in arm B, and 2/8 in arm C) and a 12-month progression-free survival (PFS) of 12.6% (95% CI 3.2-28.9), treatment efficacy of AFM13 monotherapy in all evaluable patients was modest. The continuous application schedule (arm C) might be more effective, but the visit schedule should be better aligned with patients' daily life.

Resistance to MET inhibition occurs inevitably in MET-dependent non-small cell lung cancer and the underlying mechanisms are insufficiently understood. We describe resistance mechanisms in patients with MET exon 14 skipping mutation (METΔPre- and post-treatment biopsies were analysed by NGS (next generation sequencing), digital droplet PCR (polymerase chain reaction), and FISH (fluorescense in situ hybridization). A patient-derived xenograft model was generated in one case.Of 26 patients with MET tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment, eight had paired pre- and post-treatment biopsies (Three with MET amplification, three with METΔResistance to MET inhibition is heterogeneous with on- and off-target mechanisms occurring regardless of the initial MET aberration. Switching therapy between different types of kinase inhibitors can lead to repeated responses in cases with second-site mutations. Controlled clinical trials in this setting with larger patient numbers are needed, as evidence to date is limited to preclinical data and case series.

Background: Combined-modality treatment consisting of chemotherapy and consolidation radiotherapy is standard of care for patients with early-stage unfavourable Hodgkin lymphoma. However, the use of radiotherapy can have long-term sequelae, which is of particular concern, as Hodgkin lymphoma is frequently diagnosed in young adults with a median age of approximately 30 years. In the German Hodgkin Study Group HD17 trial, we investigated whether radiotherapy can be omitted without loss of efficacy in patients who have a complete metabolic response after receiving two cycles of escalated doses of etoposide, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin, and regular doses of bleomycin, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (eBEACOPP) plus two cycles of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine (ABVD) chemotherapy (2 + 2). Methods: In this multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial, patients (aged 18–60 years) with newly diagnosed early-stage unfavourable Hodgkin lymphoma (all histologies) and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or less were enrolled at 224 hospitals and private practices in Germany, Switzerland, Austria, and the Netherlands. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either standard combined-modality treatment, consisting of the 2 + 2 regimen (eBEACOPP consisted of 1250 mg/m2 intravenous cyclophosphamide on day 1, 35 mg/m2 intravenous doxorubicin on day 1, 200 mg/m2 intravenous etoposide on days 1–3, 100 mg/m2 oral procarbazine on days 1–7, 40 mg/m2 oral prednisone on days 1–14, 1·4 mg/m2 intravenous vincristine on day 8 [maximum dose of 2 mg per cycle], and 10 mg/m2 intravenous bleomycin on day 8; ABVD consisted of 25 mg/m2 intravenous doxorubicin, 10 mg/m2 intravenous bleomycin, 6 mg/m2 intravenous vinblastine, and 375 mg/m2 intravenous dacarbazine, all given on days 1 and 15) followed by 30 Gy involved-field radiotherapy (standard combined-modality treatment group) or PET4-guided treatment, consisting of the 2 + 2 regimen followed by 30 Gy of involved-node radiotherapy only in patients with positive PET at the end of four cycles of chemotherapy (PET4; PET4-guided treatment group). Randomisation was done centrally and used the minimisation method and seven stratification factors (centre, age, sex, clinical symptoms, disease localisation, albumin concentration, and bulky disease), and patients and investigators were masked to treatment allocation until central review of the PET4 examination had been completed. With the final analysis presented here, the primary objective was to show non-inferiority of the PET4-guided strategy in a per-protocol analysis of the primary endpoint of progression-free survival. We defined non-inferiority as an absolute difference of 8% in the 5-year progression-free survival estimates between the two groups. Safety analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01356680. Findings: Between Jan 13, 2012, and March 21, 2017, we enrolled and randomly assigned 1100 patients to the standard combined-modality treatment group (n=548) or to the PET4-guided treatment group (n=552); two patients in each group were found ineligible after randomisation. At a median follow-up of 46·2 months (IQR 32·7–61·2), 5-year progression-free survival was 97·3% (95% CI 94·5–98·7) in the standard combined-modality treatment group and 95·1% (92·0–97·0) in the PET4-guided treatment group (hazard ratio 0·523 [95% CI 0·226–1·211]). The between-group difference was 2·2% (95% CI −0·9 to 5·3) and excluded the non-inferiority margin of 8%. The most common grade 3 or 4 acute haematological adverse events were leucopenia (436 [83%] of 528 patients in the standard combined-modality treatment group vs 443 [84%] of 529 patients in the PET4-guided treatment group) and thrombocytopenia (139 [26%] vs 176 [33%]), and the most frequent acute non-haematological toxic effects were infection (32 [6%] vs 40 [8%]) and nausea or vomiting (38 [7%] vs 29 [6%]). The most common acute radiotherapy-associated adverse events were dysphagia (26 [6%] in the standard combined-modality treatment group vs three [2%] in the PET4-guided treatment group) and mucositis (nine [2%] vs none). 229 serious adverse events were reported by 161 (29%) of 546 patients in the combined-modality treatment group, and 235 serious adverse events were reported by 164 (30%) of 550 patients in the PET4-guided treatment group. One suspected unexpected serious adverse reaction (infection) leading to death was reported in the PET4-guided treatment group. Interpretation: PET4-negativity after treatment with 2 + 2 chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed early-stage unfavourable Hodgkin lymphoma allows omission of consolidation radiotherapy without a clinically relevant loss of efficacy. PET4-guided therapy could thereby reduce the proportion of patients at risk of the late effects of radiotherapy. Funding: Deutsche Krebshilfe.

Purpose: A primary analysis of the ongoing NIVAHL trial demonstrated unexpectedly high interim complete response rates to nivolumab-based first-line treatment in early-stage unfavorable Hodgkin lymphoma. However, biomarkers such as metabolic tumor volume (MTV) or total lesion glycolysis (TLG) and their change under treatment (ΔMTV and ΔTLG), measured on PET, might provide additional relevant information for response assessment in this setting. Hence, the current analysis aimed to investigate early response to checkpoint inhibitor therapy beyond conventional criteria. Patients and Methods: NIVAHL is a prospective, randomized phase II trial that recruited between April 2017 and October 2018. Patients in arms A and B were assessed for early treatment response after two courses of doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine with two concomitant nivolumab infusions per cycle (2 × N-AVD) and 4 × nivolumab, respectively. In the current analysis, we included all 59 individuals with PET images available to the central review panel for quantitative analysis before April 30, 2019. Results: At interim restaging, we determined a mean ΔMTV and ΔTLG of −99.8% each in arm A after 2 × N-AVD, compared with −91.4% and −91.9%, respectively, for treatment group B undergoing 4 × nivolumab. This high decrease in MTV and TLG was observed regardless of the initial lymphoma burden. Conclusions: Our study showed that nivolumab-based first-line treatment leads to rapid, near-complete reduction of tumor metabolism in early-stage unfavorable Hodgkin lymphoma. Thus, PET-derived biomarkers might allow reduction or even omission of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Furthermore, MTV and TLG could be also used to optimize immune checkpoint-targeting treatments in other cancers.

Executive SummaryThe EC Directive 2013/59/Euratom states in article 56 that exposures of target volumes in nuclear medicine treatments shall be individually planned and their delivery appropriately verified. The Directive also mentions that medical physics experts should always be appropriately involved in those treatments. Although it is obvious that, in nuclear medicine practice, every nuclear medicine physician and physicist should follow national rules and legislation, the EANM considered it necessary to provide guidance on how to interpret the Directive statements for nuclear medicine treatments.For this purpose, the EANM proposes to distinguish three levels in compliance to the optimization principle in the directive, inspired by the indication of levels in prescribing, recording and reporting of absorbed doses after radiotherapy defined by the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU): Most nuclear medicine treatments currently applied in Europe are standardized. The minimum requirement for those treatments is ICRU level 1 (“activity-based prescription and patient-averaged dosimetry”), which is defined by administering the activity within 10% of the intended activity, typically according to the package insert or to the respective EANM guidelines, followed by verification of the therapy delivery, if applicable. Non-standardized treatments are essentially those in developmental phase or approved radiopharmaceuticals being used off-label with significantly (> 25% more than in the label) higher activities. These treatments should comply with ICRU level 2 (“activity-based prescription and patient-specific dosimetry”), which implies recording and reporting of the absorbed dose to organs at risk and optionally the absorbed dose to treatment regions. The EANM strongly encourages to foster research that eventually leads to treatment planning according to ICRU level 3 (“dosimetry-guided patient-specific prescription and verification”), whenever possible and relevant. Evidence for superiority of therapy prescription on basis of patient-specific dosimetry has not been obtained. However, the authors believe that a better understanding of therapy dosimetry, i.e. how much and where the energy is delivered, and radiobiology, i.e. radiation-related processes in tissues, are keys to the long-term improvement of our treatments.

In head and neck cancers (HNCs), fibroblast activation protein (FAP) is expressed by cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) in the tumor microenvironment. Preliminary evidence suggests that detection and staging is feasible with positron emission tomography (PET/CT) imaging using [A total of 15 patients with HNCs received both [All patients had focal FAPI uptake above background in tumor lesions. Compared to FDG, tumor uptake (median SUVmax 10.2 vs. 7.3, p = 0.008) and tumor-to-background ratios were significantly higher with FAPI than with FDG (SUVmean liver: 9.3 vs. 3.2, p 0.001; SUVmean bloodpool: 6.9 vs. 4.0, p 0.001). A total of 49 lesions were recorded. Of these, 40 (82%) were FDGWe demonstrate that [

Purpose PSMA imaging is frequently used for monitoring of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in prostate cancer. In a previous study, [18F]-JK-PSMA-7 exhibited favorable properties for tumor localization after biochemical recurrence. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the performance of [18F]-JK-PSMA-7 under ADT. Procedures We examined the performance of [18F]-JK-PSMA-7 in 70 patients (first cohort) with increasing or detectable PSA values under ADT (PSA < 2 ng/ml for 21/70 patients). We further analyzed 58 independent patients with PSA levels < 2 ng/ml under ADT, who were imaged with [68Ga]PSMA-11 or [18F]DCFPyL (second cohort). Finally, we compared detection rates between [18F]-JK-PSMA-7, [68Ga]PSMA-11, and [18F]DCFPyL. Results In the first cohort, we detected [18F]-JK-PSMA-7-positive lesions in 63/70 patients. In patients with PSA levels ≥ 2 ng/ml, the detection rate was 100 % (49/49). In patients with PSA < 2 ng/ml, the detection rate was significantly lower (66.7 %, 14/21, p = 9.7 × 10−5) and dropped from 85.7 % (12/14, PSA levels between 0.3 and 2.0 ng/ml) to 28.6 % (2/7) for PSA levels < 0.3 ng/ml (p = 1.73 × 10−2). In the second cohort (PSA < 2 ng/ml), the detection rate was 79.3 % (46/58) for [68Ga]PSMA-11 or [18F]DCFPyL. Again, the detection rate was significantly higher (p = 1.1 × 10−2) for patients with PSA levels between 0.3 and 2.0 ng/ml (87.0 %, 40/46) relative to those with PSA levels < 0.3 ng/ml (50 %, 6/12). No significant difference was found between [18F]-JK-PSMA-7 and [68Ga]PSMA-11 or [18F]DCFPyL in patients with PSA levels < 2 ng/ml (p = 0.4295). Conclusion [18F]-JK-PSMA-7 PET showed a high detection rate in patients with PSA levels ≥ 0.3 ng/ml under ADT. The lower PSA threshold of 0.3 ng/ml for high detection rates was consistent across the three PSMA ligands. Thus, PSMA imaging is suitable for clinical follow-up of patients with increasing PSA levels under ADT.

Background Treatment of patients with solid tumors and KRAS mutations remains disappointing. One option is the combined inhibition of pathways involved in RAF‐MEK‐ERK and PI3K‐AKT‐mTOR. Methods Patients with relapsed solid tumors were treated with escalating doses of everolimus (E) 2.5‐10.0 mg/d in a 14‐day run‐in phase followed by combination therapy with sorafenib (S) 800 mg/d from day 15. KRAS mutational status was assessed retrospectively in the escalation phase. Extension phase included KRAS‐mutated non–small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) only. Pharmacokinetic analyses were accompanied by pharmacodynamics assessment of E by FDG‐PET. Efficacy was assessed by CT scans every 6 weeks of combination. Results Of 31 evaluable patients, 15 had KRAS mutation, 4 patients were negative for KRAS mutation, and the KRAS status remained unknown in 12 patients. Dose‐limiting toxicity (DLT) was not reached. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was defined as 7.5 mg/d E + 800 mg/d S due to toxicities at previous dose level (10 mg/d E + 800 mg/d S) including leucopenia/thrombopenia III° and pneumonia III° occurring after the DLT interval. The metabolic response rate in FDG‐PET was 17% on day 5 and 20% on day 14. No patient reached partial response in CT scan. Median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 3.25 and 5.85 months, respectively. Conclusions Treatment of patients with relapsed solid tumors with 7.5 mg/d E and 800 mg/d S is safe and feasible. Early metabolic response in FDG‐PET was not confirmed in CT scan several weeks later. The combination of S and E is obviously not sufficient to induce durable responses in patients with KRAS‐mutant solid tumors., The study investigated the combination of sorafenib and everolimus in patients with solid tumors (dose escalation part) and KRAS mutated NSCLC (expansion part). Although the trial showed manageable safety profile of sorafenib and everolimus, it failed in providing long terms responses for patients with solid tumors and KRAS mutated NSCLC. The novelty of the study was the early pharmacodynamics assessment using FDG‐PET implemented in a phase‐I.

What is it that we actually see when looking at PET (positron emission tomography)-positive signals in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL)?The PET image visualizes the distribution and uptake of a previously int...