Search

Normalizing health-related quality of life (QoL) and fatigue are important long-term treatment targets in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We examined their evolution in relation to changes in disease activity during vedolizumab therapy.Cohort study of biologically refractory IBD patients treated with vedolizumab. Patients were prospectively evaluated at all infusions by Short Health Scale (SHS) (QoL questionnaire covering four health dimensions) (n=79), visual analogous scale for fatigue (VAS-F) (n=30), and clinical disease activity. Objective disease assessment was done after one year or at treatment failure.Patients in steroid-free clinical remission at end of induction improved significantly in all SHS items already from week 2 with full implementation by week 14 ('Symptoms' 59% improvement, p0.001; Function' 63%, p0.001; Worries' 59%, p0.001; 'Well-being' 40%, p0.01). Then, SHS remained stable at background levels (20) for one year (improvements 67%; 65%; 62%; 57%; p0.001). Combined clinical-objective remission at one year was associated with highest SHS improvements (64-72%; p0.001). Of note, early SHS improvements preceded manifestation of clinical remission in most patients (22 of 33; 67%). Clinical response materialized into late (week 6 or later) and minor SHS improvements (31-46%, p0.001). Fatigue improved steadily over 6 months to background levels (VAS-F4) among patients in clinical remission (45% decrease) or clinical-objective remission (41%). SHS and VAS-F impairment remained elevated in patients without effect of therapy.QoL rapidly improves and predicts later significant clinical-objective efficacies of vedolizumab at end of induction and one year. Fatigue improves slowly after remission is attained.

Background and aims Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) may optimize biologic and thiopurine therapies in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The study aimed to investigate implementation and utilization of TDM in Scandinavia. Methods A web-based questionnaire on the use of TDM was distributed to Scandinavian gastroenterologists via the national societies. Results In total, 297 IBD physicians prescribing biologic therapies, equally distributed between community and university hospitals, were included (response rate 42%) (Norway 118 (40%), Denmark 86 (29%), Sweden 50 (17%), Finland 33 (11%), Iceland 10 (3%)). Overall, TDM was applied during biologic therapies by 87%, and for TNF-inhibitors >90%. Among the users, reactive and proactive TDM were utilized by 90% and 63%, respectively. Danish physicians were significantly less inclined to use TDM compared to other Scandinavian countries; (58% vs 98%); OR 0.03 [0.01-0.09], p < 0.001). Reactive TDM was commonly applied at primary (74%) and secondary (99%) treatment failure. Proactive TDM was used by 80% during maintenance therapy and 56% during induction and more commonly utilized in Norway (p < 0.001), and by physicians managing >10 IBD patients/week (p = 0.005). TDM scenarios were interpreted in accord with available evidence but with discrepancies for proactive TDM. The main barriers to TDM were lack of guidelines (51%) and time lag between sampling and results (49%). TDM of thiopurines was routinely used by 87%. Conclusion TDM of biologic and thiopurine therapies has been broadly implemented into clinical practice in Scandinavia. However, physicians call for TDM guidelines detailing indications and interpretations of test results along with improved test response times. Funding Agencies|Akershus University Hospital

BackgroundTofacitinib has emerged as a new potential treatment for acute severe ulcerative colitis [ASUC]. We conducted a systematic review to assess efficacy, safety and integration in ASUC algorithms.MethodsSystematic searching was done in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Clinicaltrials.gov until August 17, 2022, including all studies reporting original observations on tofacitinib for ASUC, preferably defined according to Truelove and Witts criteria. The primary outcome was colectomy-free survival.ResultsOf 1072 publications identified, 21 studies were included of which three were ongoing clinical trials. The remaining comprised a pooled cohort originating from 15 case publications [n = 42], a GETAID cohort study [n = 55], a case-control study [n = 40 cases] and a paediatric cohort [n = 11]. Of these 148 reported cases, tofacitinib was used as second-line treatment after steroid failure in previous infliximab failures or third-line after sequential steroid and infliximab or cyclosporine failure, 69 [47%] were female, median age range was 17–34 years and disease duration was 0.7–10 years. Overall, 30-day colectomy-free survival was 85% [n = 123 of 145; n = 3 without colectomy had follow-up ConclusionTofacitinib appears promising for treatment of ASUC with high short-term colectomy-free survival among refractory patients who are otherwise deemed to require colectomy. However, large high-quality studies are needed.

Background Infliximab therapy during pregnancy in inflammatory bowel disease is challenged by a dilemma between maintaining adequate maternal disease control while minimizing fetal infliximab exposure. We investigated the effects of pregnancy on infliximab pharmacokinetics. Methods The study population comprised 23 retrospectively identified pregnancies. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease were generally in clinical remission at pregnancy conception (74%) and received steady infliximab maintenance therapy (5 mg/kg q8w n = 17; q6w n = 4; q10w n = 1; 10 mg/kg q8w n = 1). Trough blood samples had been obtained in the same patients prior to pregnancy (n = 119), the first trimester (n = 16), second trimester (n = 18), third trimester (n = 7), and postpregnancy (n = 12). Data were analyzed using nonlinear mixed‐effects population pharmacokinetic modeling. Results Dose‐normalized infliximab concentrations were significantly higher during the second trimester (median 15 mg/ml/kg, interquartile range 10–21) compared to prepregnancy (7, 2–12; p = 0.003), the first trimester (9, 1–12; p = 0.04), or postpregnancy (6, interquartile range 3–11; p > 0.05) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Similar trends were observed in the third trimester (13, 7–36; p > 0.05). A one‐compartment model with linear elimination described the pharmacokinetics of infliximab (volume of distribution n = 18.2 L; clearance 0.61 L/day). Maternal infliximab exposure was influenced by the second and third trimester of pregnancy and anti‐infliximab antibodies, and not by pregnancy‐imposed physiological changes in, for example, body weight or albumin. Infliximab clearance decreased significantly during the second and third trimesters by up to 15% as compared to pre‐ and postpregnancy and the first trimester. The increased maternal infliximab exposure was weakly associated with lowered clinical disease activity. Pharmacokinetic model simulations of virtual patients indicated the increased maternal infliximab trough concentrations imposed by pregnancy will not completely counteract the decrease in infliximab concentration if therapy is paused in the third trimester. Conclusion Infliximab clearance decreases significantly in the second and third trimesters, leading to increasing maternal infliximab concentrations in any given regimen. Maternal infliximab levels may thus be maintained as constant in a de‐intensified regimen by therapeutic drug monitoring guidance in inflammatory bowel disease., Key Summary Summarize the established knowledge on this subject IFX during pregnancy is challenged by a dilemma between maintaining adequate maternal disease control while minimizing fetal drug exposure.Clinicians may refrain from administering IFX in the last part of pregnancy to lower the risk of imposing unknown effects of anti‐TNF‐a therapy on the fetus.International guidelines are conflicting regarding whether IFX should be paused in the third trimester. What are the significant and/or new findings of this study? IFX CL significantly decreases in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy by up to 15%, resulting in increasing maternal circulating IFX levels.Maternal IFX exposure during pregnancy is affected by trimester and anti‐IFX Abs (increasing IFX CL by 69%).Increased maternal IFX exposure during pregnancy correlated weakly with lower disease activity.Maternal IFX concentrations may be maintained at a constant level at a de‐intensified therapeutic regimen in the second and third trimesters via a therapeutic drug monitoring guided‐dose adjustments.

Background: Physicians tend to focus on biomedical targets (endoscopic remission), while little is known about issues important to patients. We aimed to identify critical concepts impacting inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients.Methods: We performed a survey of patients with IBD in biologic therapy (n=172) and used a validated qualitative method called concept mapping (CM) in patient workshops. The survey included 13 questions on attitudes toward symptoms and issues related to IBD. In the eight CM workshops, patients (n=26) generated statements later clustered into concepts identifying issues impacting a patient’s life. Patients ranked the statements by importance.Results: In the questionnaire survey, patients identified fatigue (57%) and stool frequency (46%) as the most critical symptoms impacting their daily lives regardless of disease activity. In the CM workshops with Crohn’s disease (n=13), 335 statements divided among ten concepts were generated, and the three most important concepts were “Positive attitudes,” (mean 4.3) “Accept and recognition” (mean 4), and “Personal experiences with Crohn’s disease,” (mean 4). In the workshops with ulcerative colitis (n=13), 408 statements divided into 11 concepts were generated; the most important concepts were “Take responsibility and control over your life” (mean 4), “Medication” (mean 3.9), and “Everyday life with ulcerative colitis” (mean 3.7)Conclusion: While symptoms such as fatigue and stool frequency impacted daily life regardless of disease activity, patients with IBD rated concepts focusing on psychosocial factors as having the most significant impact on everyday life.Trial registration: The Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte approved the questionnaire and methodology (work-zone no.: 18015429).

Despite the increasing availability of biological treatment in recent years, thiopurines remain an important treatment option in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) both as monotherapy and in combination therapy with biologicals. Pre-treatment screening of thiopurine-methyltransferase activity and monitoring of thiopurine metabolites during treatment are essential to optimize the effectiveness and safety of thiopurines. This review provides an evidence-based practical guide to prescribing and monitoring thiopurines in patients with IBD.

Objectives: Treatment of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) should aim at achieving mucosal healing. However, monitoring schedules to support this goal remain undefined. We aimed to identify patients’ and physicians’ preferences regarding monitoring strategy and investigated the feasibility of such a strategy. Methods: Elements considered relevant for monitoring were identified in questionnaire surveys among 1) patients with IBD receiving biologic agents (n = 172) and 2) their physicians (n = 87). Adherence to a monitoring strategy incorporating these elements was investigated in a retrospective cohort of patients with IBD treated with biologic agents (n = 139). Results: Patients considered blood and stool samples, endoscopies, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to be relevant aspects of monitoring their disease. However, patients also considered stool samples and endoscopies unpleasant. Physicians considered blood samples (99%), medical consultations (99%), fecal calprotectin (85%), endoscopy (78%), and MRI (71%) to be important aspects of IBD monitoring but considered endoscopies and MRI relevant only at clinical signs of relapse. A review of the clinical use of monitoring strategies including the elements identified above revealed high adherence for blood samples and disease activity indices (92%), but low adherence for fecal calprotectin (38%), therapeutic drug monitoring (38%), and endoscopies (32%). Conclusion: Important tools for evaluating mucosal healing (e.g., endoscopy) were rated highly unpleasant by patients, and physicians found endoscopies/MRI relevant only in case of relapse. These findings were reflected by low rates of adherence to use of these monitoring tools. In defining monitoring schedules to help achieve treatment goals, these important barriers must be addressed.

Primary non-response to infliximab (IFX) inherits a poor prognosis in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We explored underlying mechanisms and therapeutic thresholds in an effort to provide basis for optimizing therapy.A prospectively followed cohort of 166 IBD patients having received standard IFX induction therapy (5 mg/kg at weeks 2, 6, and 14) had trough IFX and anti-IFX antibodies (Abs) retrospectively assessed at weeks 2 (In all, 18 patients (11%) had primary non-response. Infliximab was consistently lower throughout the induction phase in non-responders as compared to responders (Week 2: IFX median 18.9 μg/mL vs. 23.3,IBD patients with primary IFX failure generally have lower IFX trough than responders during early induction phase. Pharmacokinetic failure seems common in ulcerative colits, whereas pharmacodynamic failure appears common in Crohn's disease.

Fatigue is a common symptom reported by patients with chronic immunoinflammatory diseases and with profound negative implications on health-related quality of life. This study aimed to delineate underlying components contributing to fatigue in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) receiving biologic therapy. Cross-sectional questionnaire study of all patients with IBD receiving any biologic therapy at a tertiary IBD center. Fatigue was assessed by Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy–Fatigue (FACIT-F). Disease activity and quality of life were evaluated by generic questionnaires. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to identify components of variables explaining fatigue. Three hundred patients with IBD were included. Moderate-to-severe fatigue defined as FACIT-F ≤ 39 was present in half of the included patients. PCA condensed variables associated with fatigue into three main components contributing to 49% of observed fatigue. The first component, explaining 21% of fatigue, included factors related to disease chronicity, e.g., long disease duration, high number of previously used biologic therapies, presence of previous intestinal surgery, and increasing age. The second component explained 14% of fatigue and comprised disease activity-related aspects, e.g., disease activity indices and C-reactive protein. The third explained 14% of fatigue and comprised various nutritional deficiencies. Fatigue can partly be explained by chronicity, disease activity, and nutritional deficits. However, the cause of fatigue is unexplained in approximately half of the patients with IBD supporting that fatigue can be an independent, systemic extraintestinal disease manifestation in IBD.

The pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) involves genetic predisposition, environmental factors, and a broadly dysregulated intestinal immune response to the commensal intestinal microflora. The interface between genetic predisposition and environmental factors is reflected in the epigenetic regulation at the transcriptional level. Treatment targets now involve mucosal and histological healing, but the future might additionally include normalization of intestinal cellular functions also at the molecular level, for example comprising complete restoration of phenotypic, genotypic, and epigenetic states. Recent developments in patient-derived epithelial intestinal stem cell (ISC) organoid technologies have opened exciting new therapeutic opportunities to potentially attain molecular healing by combining stem cell therapy with molecular manipulations using (epi)drugs and/or CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing. Here, we are the first to discuss the possibility for phenotypic, genotypic, and epigenetic restoration via molecular manipulations and stem cell therapy in IBD from a clinical perspective.

ObjectivePhysicians tend to focus on biomedical targets while little is known about issues important to patients. We aimed to identify critical concepts impacting patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).DesignWe performed a survey of patients with IBD in biologic therapy (n=172) and used a validated qualitative method called group concept mapping (GCM) in patient workshops. The survey included 13 questions on attitudes toward symptoms and issues related to IBD. In the eight workshops, patients (n=26) generated statements later clustered into concepts identifying issues impacting a patient’s life. Patients ranked the statements.ResultsIn the survey, patients’ mean age were 40 years (SD 13), 53% were women, and 38% had ulcerative colitis. They identified fatigue (57%) and stool frequency (46%) as the most critical symptoms impacting their daily lives regardless of disease activity. In the GCM workshops with Crohn’s disease (n=13) (median age 42 years (IQR 39–51) and 62% were women), 335 statements divided among 10 concepts were generated, and the three most important concepts were ‘Positive attitudes’, ‘Accept and recognition’, and ‘Sharing knowledge and experiences in life with Crohn’s disease’. In the workshops with ulcerative colitis (n=13) (median age 43 years (IQR 36–49) and 69% were women), 408 statements divided into 11 concepts were generated; the most important concepts were ‘Take responsibility and control over your life’, ‘Medication’, and ‘Everyday life with ulcerative colitis’.ConclusionFocusing solely on IBD symptoms, patients identified fatigue and stool frequency to impact daily life the most. However, when investigating the disease burden in a broader perspective beyond classic IBD symptoms, patients identified concepts with focus on emotional health to be most important.Trial registrationThe Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte approved the questionnaire and methodology (work-zone no: 18015429).

Background:To implement therapeutic drug monitoring-based strategies for infliximab (IFX) in inflammatory bowel disease, the authors assessed IFX levels for optimal discrimination between remission and nonremission and compared assays for anti-IFX antibodies (Abs).Methods:The retrospective cohort comprised 163 bionaive patients with inflammatory bowel disease who received stable IFX maintenance therapy (5 mg/kg every 8 weeks [q8w]) for 1 year. The clinical and biochemical remission status was assessed at all infusions (weeks 14-22-30-38-46-54), and IFX and anti-IFX Abs were estimated using a time-resolved fluorometric assay (n = 690; 88% of infusions). Samples positive for anti-IFX Abs or IFX levels < limit of detection (n = 102) were analyzed by 2 binding assays [enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)] and functional reporter gene assay/drug-tolerant enzyme immunoassay.Results:At all assessed time points, IFX levels were more than double in patients presenting clinical or biochemical remission. An IFX concentration of 4.5 mcg/mL was associated with clinical remission during the entire first year of therapy [sensitivity 54% (49-59), specificity 73% (67-78), AUC ROC0.65 (0.60-0.69), P < 0.0001]; these values were comparable with biochemical remission. Exploratory assessments for endoscopic remission (n = 131) were performed at the discretion of the treating physician. Anti-IFX Abs were associated with undetectable IFX and treatment failure [OR 2.9 (1.4-6.0), P < 0.01], irrespective of persistency or transiency. All performed assays detected anti-IFX Abs were picked up by all assays in ∼2/3 of samples. Binding assays demonstrated a higher sensitivity to anti-IFX Abs.Conclusions:IFX at ∼5 mcg/mL was associated with clinical and biochemical remission during the first year of maintenance therapy. During this phase of therapy, standard binding assays are appropriate for therapeutic drug monitoring.

Colonoscopy is essential for optimal management of inflammatory bowel disease. However, many patients opt out due to unpleasantness related to this procedure. We investigated if Nurse Administered Propofol Sedation (NAPS) would improve patient satisfaction and attitude towards future colonoscopies.Randomized clinical trial of deep sedation with NAPS (n = 63) versus moderate midazolam and fentanyl sedation (n = 67). To assess the primary end point of patient satisfaction at discharge, we developed a Satisfaction Questionnaire comprising 13 items each rated by a 5-point Likert scale and with higher scores reflecting more positive outcomes (13-65 points).Fifty-six patients (43%) with ulcerative colitis, 48 (37%) with Crohn's disease, and 26 (20%) with high suspicion of inflammatory bowel disease were included. Most (88%) had previously had a colonoscopy and pre-procedure expectations were similar between groups. Patients receiving deep sedation had significantly higher satisfaction score (mean 60.1, SD 3.4) than those receiving moderate sedation (51.2, 8.4; P.001). This was driven especially by less pain, more amnesia, sedation more to their liking, and better experience with the current than previous sedations. Importantly, these patients significantly more often preferred the same sedation for a future colonoscopy and were also inclined to accept more frequent colonoscopies. Assistance from another colonoscopist and disruption of the procedure due to pain occurred significantly more frequent in the moderate sedation group. There were no safety signals associated with NAPS.Patients with inflammatory bowel disease favor deep propofol sedation over moderate midazolam and fentanyl sedation. Availability of NAPS may facilitate patient adherence to endoscopy-based monitoring programs. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01934088.

Background: The therapeutic role of methotrexate (MTX) for management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remains unclear. Methods: We systematically reviewed randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) of MTX for induction and maintenance of remission in IBD until January 2020 in accordance with PROSPERO protocol (#CRD42018115047). Relative risk (RR) of maintenance of remission, induction of remission, endoscopic disease activity, and adverse events were combined in a meta-analysis. Findings: MTX monotherapy was not superior to placebo for induction of clinical remission in Crohn's disease (CD). However, MTX was superior to placebo in maintaining clinical remission of CD. Concomitant therapy with MTX and the TNF inhibitor infliximab (IFX) was not superior to IFX monotherapy in CD. In ulcerative colitis (UC), MTX monotherapy was not superior to placebo neither for induction of clinical remission, nor for maintenance of clinical remission. MTX did not result in superior endoscopic outcomes during induction or maintenance therapy compared with placebo. Regarding adverse events (AEs), our meta-analysis on CD studies showed a significantly higher risk of AEs when comparing MTX versus placebo in studies investigating induction of remission, but not in maintenance of remission. In UC, no such differences in AEs between MTX or placebo were observed. Interpretation: Current data support the efficacy of parenteral MTX monotherapy for maintenance of clinical remission in CD. MTX is not confirmed to be effective for treatment of UC or for induction of remission in CD. No evidence supports concomitant MTX to improve efficacy of IFX (no other biologics investigated). Keywords: Crohn's disease, Inflammatory bowel disease, Methotrexate, Therapy, Ulcerative colitis

Optimal management of Crohn's disease patients having responded to infliximab but without achieving remission is not well defined. The present study examined if these patients benefit from continued long-term infliximab maintenance therapy.Retrospective cohort study including all patients treated with infliximab for 1 year until the end of 2017 who have had a response but not reached remission on infliximab. Clinical outcomes were defined by the physicians' global evaluation, supported by clinical indices and objective markers of disease activity.In total, 376 Crohn's disease patients received infliximab. Among these, 76 (20%) were classified as having response but non-remission (RNR) after 1 year of therapy. A great majority (n = 54; 71%) experienced no additional therapeutic benefit after a further year of infliximab maintenance therapy, thus still having RNR. Nineteen patients (25%) obtained remission during continued infliximab, whereas only 4% (n = 3) experienced treatment failure. Although infliximab therapy beyond 2 years (follow-up median 35 months, IQR: 23-55) was accompanied by a higher proportion attaining remission (40%), nearly half (46%) still failed to improve. Among patients who had discontinued infliximab while having RNR (n = 21), half (n = 11) experienced disease flare within five months (median 22 weeks, IQR: 12-31).Most patients (71%) had no additional therapeutic benefit after an additional year of infliximab therapy, and after a median maintenance infliximab treatment period of 3 years, half still failed to improve further. Considering the importance of achieving complete remission, these patients appear to have an unmet medical need.

Interactions between thiopurines and infliximab presumably contribute to superior effect of infliximab–thiopurine combination therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We examined whether principal cytotoxic thiopurine metabolites influence adalimumab (ADL) and anti-ADL antibodies (Abs). Ninety-eight IBD patients previously treated with infliximab (96%) in whom trough ADL and anti-ADL Abs had been assessed as part of their clinical care were included. Thiopurine metabolites [6-thioguanine nucleotides (6-TGN) and methylated mercaptopurine metabolites (6-MeMP)] were determined at similar time points. ADL–thiopurine combination therapy was not associated with reduced anti-ADL Ab positivity compared to ADL monotherapy: 8/31 (26%) versus 19/67 (28%), p = 1.00. Concentrations of thiopurine metabolites were similar in anti-ADL Ab-positive and negative patients (6-TGN median 109 pmol/8 × 108 RBC vs. 112, p = 0.80; 6-MeMP 448 RBC vs. 720, p = 0.94). ADL trough levels did not differ between anti-ADL Ab-negative patients on ADL–thiopurine combination therapy and those on monotherapy (9.5 μg/mL vs. 7.6, p = 0.31). ADL levels were also comparable between patients on ADL mono- and combination therapy after stratification for 6-TGN/6-MeMP quartiles. There were no correlations between levels of 6-TGN and ADL (rP = − 0.17, p = 0.45; rS = − 0.38, p = 0.08), or 6-MeMP and ADL (rP = − 0.23, p = 0.31; rS = − 0.35, p = 0.11). Anti-ADL Ab positivity was associated with ADL treatment failure (OR 6 [2–20], p

Background Fatigue is a common reported symptom by patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and often with profound negative impact on quality of life including daily activities. The aim of this study was to encircle clusters of key components associated with fatigue to explore if fatigue is an independent IBD disease manifestation. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted in patients with IBD receiving biologic therapies at the tertiary IBD Clinic at Herlev Hospital, Denmark, from March to May 2019. Consecutive patients were asked to participate in a questionnaire survey when visiting the clinic. The questionnaire included: FACIT-Fatigue, Harvey-Bradshaw Index/Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index, short health scale, short IBD Questionnaire, and EQ-5D-5L. Additional disease-related information was retrieved from medical records. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to identify factors associated with fatigue. Results Three hundred patients with IBD (Crohn’s disease n=190 (62%); ulcerative colitis n=110 (38%), mean age 44 years, SD 14) treated with biologics were included. The median FACIT F-score was 39 for the population, and scores ≤39 were considered moderate-to-severe fatigue. A high proportion of patients had moderate-to-severe fatigue (n=152 (51%)), these patients had significantly higher clinical disease activity (moderate-to-severe, n=56 (37%); remission, n=47 (31%)), compared to those with none-to-mild fatigue (n=148 (49%)) (moderate-to-severe, n=10 (7%); remission, n=105 (71%)) (p Conclusion Fatigue in IBD is only to a lesser extent driven by disease activity and nutritional deficits, chronicity, and co-morbidity. This indicates that fatigue is an independent disease manifestation in IBD.

Background Therapeutic options for inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) have documented effect on hard endpoints such as clinical and endoscopic remission. However, little is still known about issues that are of concern and importance to patients. This study aimed to explore, and rate, the importance of treatment- and disease-related issues and concerns experienced by patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) by a state-of-the art qualitative approach. Methods Concept Mapping (CM) is a validated qualitative method, widely used to identify and organize disease- and treatment-related issues. In 8 CM workshops each with 3–4 participating patients, patients’ statements were elicited through a nominal group technique and organized using themes. The statements were visualized by multidimensional scaling, and cluster analysis was used to retrieve clusters organized by themes. The result was validated by patients, and further rated in terms of clinical importance. Then, thematic analyses were performed to generate a conceptual model of disease-related issues and concerns. Results In all, 13 CD and 13 UC patients participated of whom 7 (53%) and 3 (23%) were in clinical remission. There were 8 (62%) and 9 (69%) females, median disease duration of 17 years (IQR 12–20) and 11 years (5–15) respectively. In each disease group, 12 (92%) received biologics and 1 (8%) thiopurine, median age was 42 years (38–50). In the CD and UC workshops, 335 and 408 statements were generated, respectively, resulting in 10 CD and 11 UC clusters. The 5 highest rated clusters from each disease group along with generic clusters are shown in the Figure 1ab. Three clusters were rated to be “very important” (mean ≥ 4) for CD (Positive attitude, Acceptance and recognition, and Personal experiences living with CD), and 1 cluster for UC (Take responsibility and control over your own life). In the above-mentioned clusters, statements rated as of great importance (median= 5) were scattered as follows for CD 6/15 (40%), 10/35 (29%) and 12/30 (40%), respectively; and for UC 27/62 (44%)). In addition, UC patients also rated statements about efficacy of medication, and concerns and consequences high. CD patients created 26 (8%) (median=4) and UC 10 (2.5%) (median=4.5) symptoms specific statements scattered in different clusters. Conclusion The majority of the core concepts found in this study originated from patients’ perspectives focused on personomics, rather than from conventional patient reported outcomes such as bowel symptoms. Some core concepts differed across diseases, but most were independent of disease type. These data offer new knowledge to guide selection of clinically relevant and value-based treatment outcomes for IBD patients.

Based on randomized, placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) performed in Crohn’s disease, methotrexate has been used primarily for patients failing thiopurines but also for ulcerative colitis under the a...

Background: Circulating infliximab (IFX) concentrations correlate with clinical outcomes, forming the basis of the IFX concentration monitoring in patients with Crohn's disease. This study aims to investigate and refine the exposure-response relationship by linking the disease activity markers "Crohn's disease activity index" (CDAI) and C-reactive protein (CRP) to IFX exposure. In addition, we aim to explore the correlations between different disease markers and exposure metrics. Methods: Data from 47 Crohn's disease patients of a randomized controlled trial were analyzed post hoc. All patients had secondary treatment failure at inclusion and had received intensified IFX of 5 mg/kg every 4 weeks for up to 20 weeks. Graphical analyses were performed to explore exposure-response relationships. Metrics of exposure included area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and trough concentrations (Cmin). Disease activity was measured by CDAI and CRP values, their change from baseline/last visit, and response/remission outcomes at week 12. Results: Although trends toward lower Cmin and lower AUC in nonresponders were observed, neither CDAI nor CRP showed consistent trends of lower disease activity with higher IFX exposure across the 30 evaluated relationships. As can be expected, Cmin and AUC were strongly correlated with each other. Contrarily, the disease activity markers were only weakly correlated with each other. Conclusions: No significant relationship between disease activity, as evaluated by CDAI or CRP, and IFX exposure was identified. AUC did not add benefit compared with Cmin. These findings support the continued use of Cmin and call for stringent objective disease activity (bio-)markers (eg, endoscopy) to form the basis of personalized IFX therapy for Crohn's disease patients with IFX treatment failure.

Background It remains unknown whether infliximab (IFX) successfully can be discontinued once Crohn's disease (CD) patients have attained sustained, complete clinical, biochemical, and endoscopic remission. No randomized, placebo (PBO) controlled trial has previously assessed this. Methods This double-blind, randomized, PBO-controlled multicenter trial enrolled patients with luminal CD who had been treated with standard IFX maintenance therapy for at least 1 year, in complete remission at the time of inclusion defined as CD Activity Index (CDAI) 150 with an increase in CDAI >70-point from baseline over two consecutive weeks; or definitive clinical relapse requiring immediate intervention as judged by treating physician) in the intention-to-treat population. Results The study population comprised 115 patients (n=54 female; age median 34 years [IQR 26-50]; disease duration median 6 years [3-12]; IFX treatment duration median 23 months [16-39]). All patients were in combined clinical- (CDAI median 41 [IQR 15-66]), biochemical- (CRP median 3mg/L [IQR 2-4]), and endoscopic- (Simple Endoscopic Score for CD median 0, [IQR 0-0] (n=99)) remission. Patients were randomized to continued IFX therapy (n=59) or to start PBO infusions (n=56) (Figure 1). Time to relapse was significantly shorter among patients who discontinued IFX as compared to those continuing IFX (p 150) the figures were 47% in the PBO group vs. 98% in IFX group (p Conclusion This first double-blinded placebo-controlled RCT of IFX withdrawal in Crohn's disease patients strongly suggests that discontinuation of IFX leads to a considerable risk of relapse despite combined clinical, biochemical, and endoscopic remission. Download : Download high-res image (53KB) Download : Download full-size image Download : Download high-res image (56KB) Download : Download full-size image

Objectives: Characterise the circulating inflammatory cytokine pattern among patients failing consecutive anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) and anti-integrin treatments to identify predictors of response.Methods: A retrospective single-centre cohort study of 28 patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) receiving anti-integrin therapy (vedolizumab) subsequent to the failure of anti-TNF treatment was conducted. Blood samples were obtained immediately prior to initiation of vedolizumab therapy, and the response to treatment was evaluated after completion of the 14-week induction regimen. Multiplex ELISA was applied to quantify 47 preselected plasma proteins based on their putative involvement in the inflammatory process in IBD.Results: Anti-TNF and vedolizumab non-responders (n=20) had significantly higher levels of circulating interleukin (IL)-6 than anti-TNF non-responders with subsequent response to vedolizumab (n=8): median 9.5 pg/mL versus 5.9 pg/mL, pConclusions: Patients with IBD failing vedolizumab induction and anti-TNF therapy have persistent IL-6 pathway activity, which could be a potential alternative treatment target. sCD40L, osteocalcin and the IL-6 pathway activity might be predictors for response to vedolizumab.

Implementation of guidelines for prevention of infectious diseases during anti-TNFα therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is important but difficult. We investigated whether systematic information to health-care professionals about these guidelines improves patients' adherence.The study comprised three parts: (1) cross-sectional evaluation of baseline vaccination status in all IBD patients in anti-TNFα therapy (reference group; n=130); (2) prospective interventional study, where health-care professionals received systematic oral and written information about vaccination guidelines at baseline and at 2-month intervals for 6 months, followed by reassessment of vaccination status (intervention group; n=99); (3) cross-sectional evaluation of representative gastroenterologists' knowledge of guidelines (n=53). Outcomes were assessed by validated questionnaires.Patients' adherence to vaccination guidelines increased significantly after a period of systematic information to health-care professionals. Hence, complete adherence increased from 5 to 26%, partial adherence from 38 to 56%, and complete non-adherence decreased from 57 to 18% (P0.0001). Adherence to all individual vaccinations except human papilloma virus increased significantly (P≤0.0021). Improvement was independent of disease type and anti-TNFα agent. At baseline, only 8% of physicians could identify all elements in the reference guideline. Additional barriers reported by physicians were forgetfulness (32%) and insufficient consultation time (26%). Patient-perceived barriers were costs of vaccinations (35%) and forgetfulness (25%).Gastroenterologists' limited knowledge of vaccination guidelines during anti-TNFα therapy can be overcome by systematic education of health-care professionals. This inexpensive and easily accessible intervention immediately results in markedly improved patient adherence. Remaining obstacles for adherence comprise high vaccination costs and forgetfulness.

BACKGROUND: This study assessed the effects of infliximab (IFX) treatment failure on patient-reported outcomes and explored the influence of using personalized treatment in this situation.METHODS: Sixty-nine Crohn's disease patients with IFX treatment failure were randomized to an intensified IFX regimen (n = 36) or personalized treatment defined by IFX and anti-IFX antibodies (n = 33). Health-related quality of life evaluated with the Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) and productivity evaluated with the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI:CD) were assessed at treatment failure and after 4, 8, 12 and 20 weeks.RESULTS: Median IBDQ score at manifestation of IFX treatment failure was 40 and improved markedly in responders by 11 at weeks 4 and 8 (p < 0.001) and by 13 at weeks 12 and 20 (p < 0.001). Non-responders improved modestly at weeks 12 and 20 (increase of median 4, p < 0.05). Overall activity impairment was high at IFX failure (median 70%) and decreased substantially in responders (40-50%, p < 0.001) and to a lesser extent in non-responders (15-40%, p < 0.05). In employed patients (55%), absenteeism was negligible during the entire study period. However, median presenteeism was 40% at manifestation of IFX failure and decreased only among responders across time (decrease 10-30%, p < 0.05). Although anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) therapy was discontinued in most patients handled by personalized treatment, IBDQ and WPAI:CD scores were similar in these patients compared with patients routinely dose-intensified on IFX.CONCLUSION: Regaining low disease activity after IFX failure is necessary for minimizing patient impairment and indirect disease-related costs. A personalized treatment strategy does not have a negative influence on patient-reported outcomes.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Intensification of the infliximab (IFX) regimen is recommended if the treatment effect is inadequate. However, the rationale for this is not well defined as the underlying mechanisms vary. The aim of this study was to explore the association between changes in serum IFX and anti-IFX antibodies (Abs) after IFX intensification and clinical outcomes.METHODS: We performed a post hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial including 42 Crohn's disease patients with IFX treatment failure, all treated with an intensified IFX regimen (5mg/kg every 4 week) for 12 weeks. Trough serum IFX and anti-IFX Ab concentrations were measured by a homogeneous mobility shift binding assay (HMSA) and a functional cell-based reporter gene assay (RGA) at treatment failure and the end of the trial.RESULTS: Twenty-one patients (50%) regained clinical response on the intensified IFX regimen. The increase in serum trough levels of IFX during treatment intensification was higher among responders than non-responders (RGA, 8.8 versus 3.0 μg/mL, p = 0.035; HMSA, 9.9 versus 4.7 μg/mL, p = 0.040), and differentiated patients by clinical outcome (RGA, area under receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] 0.75 [0.53-0.97], p = 0.035; HMSA, AUC 0.74 [0.53-0.95], p = 0.042). All responders exhibited an IFX increase ≥2.6 μg/mL (sensitivity 100%, specificity 50%). Anti-IFX Abs detected by HMSA in 13 patients (32%) were often non-functional and became undetectable during IFX intensification. However, even functional anti-IFX Abs detected by RGA in six patients (15%) became undetectable.CONCLUSION: Increase in IFX levels following treatment intensification was associated with improved clinical outcomes, indicating insufficient drug levels in a subgroup of patients. Anti-IFX Abs may become undetectable during treatment intensification, suggesting lowered production or the formation of immune complexes.

Background One-third of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients show no response to infliximab (IFX) induction therapy, and approximately half of patients responding become unresponsive over time. Thus, identification of potential treatment response biomarkers are of great clinical significance. This study employs spectroscopy-based metabolic profiling of serum from patients with IBD treated with IFX and healthy subjects (1) to substantiate the use of spectroscopy as a semi-invasive diagnostic tool, (2) to identify potential biomarkers of treatment response and (3) to characterise the metabolic changes during management of patients with tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors. Methods Successive serum samples collected during IFX induction treatment (weeks 0, 2, 6 and 14) from 87 IBD patients and 37 controls were analysed by 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Data were analysed with principal components analysis and orthogonal projection to latent structures discriminant analysis using SIMCA-P+ v12 and MATLAB. Results Metabolic profiles were significantly different between active ulcerative colitis and controls, active Crohn’s disease and controls, and quiescent Crohn’s disease and controls. Metabolites holding differential power belonged primarily to lipids and phospholipids with proatherogenic characteristics and metabolites in the pyruvate metabolism, suggestive of an intense inflammation-driven energy demand. IBD patients not responding to IFX were identified as a potentially distinct group based on their metabolic profile, although no applicable response biomarkers could be singled out in the current setting. Conclusion 1H NMR spectroscopy of serum samples is a powerful semi-invasive diagnostic tool in flaring IBD. With its use, we provide unique insights into the metabolic changes taking place during induction treatment with IFX. Of distinct clinical relevance is the identification of a reversible proatherogenic lipid profile in IBD patients with active disease, which partially explains the increased risk of cardiovascular disease associated with IBD. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12916-017-0949-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Interactions between principal cytotoxic thiopurine metabolites, that is 6-thioguanine nucleotides [6-TGN], and infliximab [IFX] and anti-IFX antibodies [Abs] may contribute to higher effectiveness of IFX-thiopurine combination therapy than monotherapies in inflammatory bowel disease.To examine if thiopurine metabolites influenced trough IFX and anti-IFX Abs, 89 patients previously assessed for anti-IFX Abs were included. To assess if IFX influenced thiopurine metabolites, eight patients who had responded to 12 weeks of intensified IFX at a constant thiopurine dosing were included.In the first cohort, IFX-thiopurine combination therapy reduced anti-IFX Ab detection [8/40; 20%] as compared with IFX monotherapy [22/49; 45%], odds ratio [OR] 0.31 [0.12-0.80], p0.05. 6-TGN was significantly lower in anti-IFX Ab-positive patients (50 pmol/8 × 108 red blood cells [RBC] vs 105, p0.01). All anti-IFX Ab-positive patients had 6-TGN117 pmol/8 × 108 RBC (sensitivity 100% [63-100], specificity 47% [29-65], area under the curveROC = 0.82, p0.01). Trough IFX was similar between anti-IFX Ab-negative patients in IFX monotherapy and IFX-thiopurine combination therapy [5.1 μg/mL vs 4.9, p = 0.76]. 6-TGN and IFX did not correlate [rP = 0.04, p = 0.83; rS = 0.02, p = 0.89, respectively]. In the second cohort, trough IFX increased during IFX intensification [ΔIFX median 6.5 μg/mL, p = 0.02], but 6-TGN was stable [6-TGN at Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12: 90 pmol/8 × 108 RBC, 93, 101, 90; p0.05]. Methylated mercaptopurine metabolite associations were consistently negative.Superior effect of IFX-thiopurine combination therapy over monotherapies partly relates to decrease in anti-IFX Abs, which associates with 6-TGN levels and has a lower therapeutic threshold than during thiopurine monotherapy. Additional benefit likely ascribes to synergy between different anti-inflammatory modes of action rather than direct drug interactions.

BACKGROUND Primary infliximab treatment failure is common in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and represents a challenge to clinicians. Treatment options are limited. This study assessed the prognosis, defined as surgery-free survival, in patients with primary infliximab treatment failure as compared to patients without primary failure (initial responders). Furthermore, this study assessed the specter of medical therapies used after primary infliximab treatment failure along with treatment outcomes. METHODS Retrospective, observational, cohort study of patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with infliximab as first-line anti-tumor necrosis factor treatment at a tertiary center. Primary infliximab treatment failure was defined as no clinical improvement during infliximab induction therapy resulting in discontinuation of infliximab therapy. RESULTS A total of 560 patients (Crohn's disease n = 353 and ulcerative colitis n = 207) were treated with infliximab. Among these, 81 (15%) had primary infliximab treatment failure after a median of 3 infusions (weeks 0, 2, and 6) (interquartile range 2-4). The median surgery-free survival was 196 days from first infusion. One year after primary infliximab treatment failure, the majority of patients (n = 51, 63%) had inflammatory bowel disease-related surgery (Crohn's disease n = 19, 58%; ulcerative colitis n = 32, 67%; P = 0.49). There was a markedly increased risk of surgery in patients with primary infliximab treatment failure as compared to initial responders: odds ratio 6.3 (3.8-10.6), P < 0.0001. Among 30 patients handled by medical therapies, 16 (53%) still had active disease 1 year after primary infliximab treatment failure. CONCLUSIONS Primary infliximab treatment failure is associated with poor outcome including high risk of surgery or sustained active disease despite medical interventions.

Immune modulating drugs such as thiopurines (azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine) and methotrexate has been a mainstay for treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) for decades. However, despite widely used in IBD, questions still remain concerning the most rational treatment regimens of these agents. Results from a range of recent studies necessitate increased awareness on how to best use these potent drugs in the clinic. As controversy still remains regarding the most appropriate use of immunomodulators, this review is based on scrutinizing the current literature, with emphasis on randomized controlled trials and Cochrane reviews, focusing on aspects that can lead to optimal and evidence-based thiopurine and methotrexate treatment strategies in IBD.

Cost-effective guidance of therapeutic strategy in Crohn's disease patients with secondary infliximab (IFX) treatment failure may be achieved by serum IFX and anti-IFX antibody (Ab) measurements by radioimmunoassay (RIA). This study investigated implications of using other techniques for this purpose.This is a post hoc analysis of randomized clinical trial including 66 Crohn's disease patients with IFX failure in whom IFX and anti-IFX Ab measurements by RIA had been used for therapeutic guidance. Samples were additionally assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), homogeneous mobility shift assay (HMSA), and functional cell-based reporter gene assay (RGA).IFX detection was comparable between assays (82% RIA, 76% ELISA, 88% HMSA, and 74% RGA), and it correlated significantly (Pearson's r=0.91-0.97, P0.0001). However, IFX concentrations varied systematically between all pair of assays except RIA-RGA. Anti-IFX Ab detection was variable (27% RIA, 9% ELISA, 33% HMSA, and 11% RGA), but correlated significantly (Pearson's r=0.77-0.96; P0.0001). Anti-IFX Abs detected by RIA and HMSA were often from sera without drug-neutralizing activity (RGA). Assays agreed on classification of underlying mechanism for treatment failure in most cases (79-94%). The majority (74-88%) failed IFX owing to pharmacodynamic problems, or had noninflammatory pathophysiology for symptoms resembling relapse. Applied threshold for therapeutic vs. subtherapeutic IFX level influenced classifications. The four different assays did not differ in terms of the ability to predict response to interventions defined by the algorithm.Despite variable analytical properties, common assays result in similar classifications and interventions in patients with IFX treatment failure, and with comparable clinical outcomes. Implications are, however, profound for the minority classified differently.

A recent review by Hendy et al 1 discusses the use of anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) drug and anti-drug antibody (ADAb) measurements to achieve a personalised approach to treating patients with inflammatory bowel disease with loss of response (LOR) to protein-based TNF-antagonist therapy. While highly appreciated and filling an important gap in the current management of patients with LOR, the review leaves out important pharmacoimmunological information related to drug immunogenicity, particularly the clinical relevance of technologies used to measure ADAb.2 It should be noted that blood levels of infused or injected anti-TNF drugs vary considerably in the periods between repeated drug administrations (figure 1). Assessing circulating drug levels is therefore highly dependent upon the time from drug administration to blood sampling. If ADAb develops, these variations are even more complex, and assessments of drug and ADAb become dependent on time of blood sampling and on the kinetics of binding between drug and ADAb. The latter governs formation of immune complexes containing drug and ADAb, the size and stability of these complexes, their ability to bind and activate other serum components such as complement and, subsequently, elimination of the immune complexes from the circulation. In this scenario, the test characteristics of a given assay will markedly affect the reported levels of both drug and ADAb. While a test designed …