Search

Background: Interferon beta-1a remains an important treatment option for multiple sclerosis, particularly when safety or tolerability concerns may outweigh the benefits of higher-efficacy disease-modifying therapies. The five-year phase 4 Plegridy Observational Program (POP) study (NCT02230969) collected data on real-world safety and effectiveness of Plegridy® (peginterferon beta-1a) treatment in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis., Objective: To explore the real-world safety and effectiveness of peginterferon beta-1a in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis, including factors influencing treatment discontinuation., Methods: Data were collected prospectively from patients ≥ 18 years old with relapsing multiple sclerosis for overall population analysis and for subpopulations including newly/previously diagnosed patients, age, and experience with peginterferon beta-1a. Outcome measures included annualized relapse rates, adverse events, and predictors of time to treatment discontinuation., Results: Mean (SD) treatment duration in the overall population ( N  = 1172) was 896.0 (733.15) days. Incidence of adverse events was higher in new than experienced users (79.4% vs. 57.0%). New users were more likely than experienced users to discontinue (hazard ratio = 1.60; P  < 0.0001). The adjusted annualized relapse rate was 0.09, and at the end of 5 years, 77.1% of patients were relapse-free., Conclusions: Peginterferon beta-1a is an effective therapy for managing relapsing multiple sclerosis. The identification of predictors of discontinuation can help inform strategies to enhance treatment persistence., Competing Interests: The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: MS has received grant support and/or speaker honoraria from Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, and Teva Neuroscience. SW is a paid consultant, speaker, and/or contract researcher for Biogen, Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, EMD Serono, Genentech/Roche, Genzyme/Sanofi, Novartis, Receptos, and TG Therapeutics. GN has received speaker honoraria from Bayer, Biogen, Celgene, Merck, Novartis, and Roche. NB, AK, WC-B, and MV are employees of and may hold stock and/or stock options in Biogen. TK was an employee of Biogen at the time of these analyses and may hold stock and/or stock options in Biogen., (© The Author(s), 2024.)

Background: Diroximel fumarate (DRF) is approved for adults with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) in Europe and for relapsing forms of MS in the United States. DRF and dimethyl fumarate (DMF) yield bioequivalent exposure of the active metabolite monomethyl fumarate. Prior studies indicated fewer gastrointestinal (GI)-related adverse events (AEs) with DRF compared with DMF., Objective: To report final outcomes from EVOLVE-MS-1., Methods: EVOLVE-MS-1 was an open-label, 96-week, phase 3 study assessing DRF safety, tolerability, and efficacy in patients with RRMS. The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability; efficacy endpoints were exploratory., Results: Overall, 75.7% (800/1057) of patients completed the study; median exposure was 1.8 (range: 0.0-2.0) years. AEs occurred in 938 (88.7%) patients, mostly of mild (28.9%) or moderate (50.3%) severity. DRF was discontinued due to AEs in 85 (8.0%) patients, with < 2% discontinuing due to GI or flushing/flushing-related AEs. At Week 96, mean number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions was significantly reduced from baseline (72.7%; p < 0.0001); adjusted annualized relapse rate was 0.13 (95% confidence interval: 0.11-0.15)., Conclusion: DRF was generally well tolerated over 2 years, with few discontinuations due to AEs; radiological measures indicated decreased disease activity from baseline. These outcomes support DRF as a treatment option in patients with RRMS., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: BAS: research grant support from AbbVie, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Greenwich Biosciences, Novartis, and Sanofi and consulting and/or speaking fees from Alexion, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cigna, Cycle, EMD Serono, Genentech, Horizon, Janssen, Novartis, Octave Bioscience, Roche, Sanofi, and TG Therapeutics.DLA: consulting fees from Albert Charitable Trust, Alexion Pharma, Biogen, Celgene, Frequency Therapeutics, Genentech, Med-Ex Learning, Merck, Novartis, Population Council, Receptos, Roche, and Sanofi-Aventis; grants from Biogen, Immunotec, and Novartis; and equity interest in NeuroRx.JD: advisory boards for Amicus, Biogen, Janssen, Medis, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, and Teva; speaker bureaus for Biogen, Bayer, Hemofarm, Janssen, Medis, Medtronic, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva, and Zentiva; and research grant from Roche.MSF: research/educational grants from Sanofi-Genzyme; honoraria/consultation fees from Alexion/AstraZeneca, BMS (Celgene), EMD Serono, Hoffman La-Roche, Actelion/Janssen (J&J), Novartis, Quanterix, Sanofi-Genzyme, and Teva Canada Innovation; advisory boards/boards of directors for Alexion/AstraZeneca, Atara Biotherapeutics, Bayer Healthcare, Celestra Health, Hoffman La-Roche, Actelion/Janssen (J&J), EMD Serono/Merck Serono, Novartis, and Sanofi-Genzyme; and participated in speakers bureau for Sanofi-Genzyme and EMD Serono.RG: research support and speaker’s honoraria from Bayer-Schering, Biogen Idec, BMS, Chugai, Eisai, Genesis, Janssen, Merck Serono, Nikkiso Pharma, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Sandoz, and Teva; consulting honoraria from ZLB Behring, Baxter, Roche, and Talecris; and personal stock options in Bayer, Merck, and Roche.MG: consulting fees from Biogen, EMD Serono, Novartis, and Sanofi-Genzyme; research support from Alkermes; and speaker bureaus for Biogen, EMD Serono, Genentech-Roche, and Sanofi-Genzyme.EJ: advisory boards for Biogen and speaker fees from Biogen, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi.CLG: consultant/advisory boards/speaker bureaus for Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, EMD Serono, Genentech, Janssen, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, and TG Therapeutics.RTN: consultant for Abata Therapeutics, Banner Life Sciences, BeiGene, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Genentech, Genzyme, GW Therapeutics, Janssen, Horizon Therapeutics, Lundbeck, NervGen, and TG Therapeutics.DN: research support from and consultant/advisory boards/speaker bureaus for Adamas, Alkermes, Alexion, Bayer, Biogen, Celgene/BMS, EMD Serono, Janssen, Novartis, Roche-Genentech, and Sanofi-Genzyme.JO: research support from Biogen Idec, EMD Serono, and Roche and personal compensation for consulting/speaking from Biogen Idec, BMS, EMD Serono, Eli Lilly, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, and Novartis.MAHP: consultant/advisory boards/speaker bureaus for Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, EMD Serono, Genentech, Janssen, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, and TG Therapeutics.KS: research support from Merck; advisory boards for Biogen, Celgene/BMS, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, and TG Therapeutics.FTB: research support and travel grants, through his institution, from the German Science Fund (DFG), German Federal Ministry of Education and Science (BMBF), Bayer-Schering, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, and Teva and speaker fees from and advisory boards for Actelion, Alexion, Bayer, Biogen, CSL Behring, Fresenius, Horizon, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, and Teva.AW: adviser fees from AbbVie and research support from AbbVie, Alkermes, and Biogen.TZ: personal compensation for consulting services and speaker honoraria from Bayer, Biogen Idec, Novartis, Sanofi, Synthon, and Teva and financial support for research activities from Bayer, Biogen Idec, Novartis, Sanofi-Aventis, and Teva.WC-B, HC, SL, MS, SLS, and TW: employees of and hold stock/stock options in Biogen.SW: consulting fees from and advisory boards for Biogen, Celgene, and EMD Serono; speaker bureaus for Biogen, Celgene, EMD Serono, Roche-Genentech, and Sanofi-Genzyme; and research support from Biogen, Celgene, EMD Serono, Novartis, Receptos, Roche-Genentech, Sanofi-Genzyme, and TG.

Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) comparative effectiveness research needs to go beyond average treatment effects (ATEs) and post-host subgroup analyses., Objective: This retrospective study assessed overall and patient-specific effects of dimethyl fumarate (DMF) versus teriflunomide (TERI) in patients with relapsing-remitting MS., Methods: A novel precision medicine (PM) scoring approach leverages advanced machine learning methods and adjusts for imbalances in baseline characteristics between patients receiving different treatments. Using the German NeuroTransData registry, we implemented and internally validated different scoring systems to distinguish patient-specific effects of DMF relative to TERI based on annualized relapse rates, time to first relapse, and time to confirmed disease progression., Results: Among 2791 patients, there was superior ATE of DMF versus TERI for the two relapse-related endpoints ( p  = 0.037 and 0.018). Low to moderate signals of treatment effect heterogeneity were detected according to individualized scores. A MS patient subgroup was identified for whom DMF was more effective than TERI ( p  = 0.013): older (45 versus 38 years), longer MS duration (110 versus 50 months), not newly diagnosed (74% versus 40%), and no prior glatiramer acetate usage (35% versus 5%)., Conclusion: The implemented approach can disentangle prognostic differences from treatment effect heterogeneity and provide unbiased patient-specific profiling of comparative effectiveness based on real-world data., Competing Interests: X Jiang, G Simoneau, A Harrington, W Castro-Borrero, C de Moor, F Pellegrini are employees and former employees of and hold stock/stock options in Biogen. L Tian received consulting fees from Biogen. M Zuercher, P van Hoevell, and Y Heer are employees of Rewoso AG, Zürich, Switzerland. A Bergmann has received consulting fees from advisory board, speaker, and other activities for NeuroTransData; project management and clinical studies for and travel expenses from Novartis and Servier. S Braune has received honoraria from Kassenaerztliche Vereinigung Bayern and health maintenance organizations for patient care; honoraria for consulting, project management, clinical studies, and lectures and from Biogen, Eli Lilly, Merck, NeuroTransData, Novartis, Roche, and Thieme Verlag; honoraria and expense compensation as board member of NeuroTransData., (© The Author(s), 2023.)

Objective: To compare clinical and imaging features of multiple sclerosis (MS) severity between Black Americans (BAs) and White Americans (WAs) and to evaluate the role of socioeconomic status., Methods: We compared BA and WA participants in the Multiple Sclerosis Partners Advancing Technology Health Solutions (MS PATHS) cohort with respect to MS characteristics, including self-reported disability, objective neurologic function assessments, and quantitative brain MRI measurements, after covariate adjustment (including education level, employment, or insurance as socioeconomic indicators). In a subgroup, we evaluated within-race, neighborhood-level indicators of socioeconomic status (SES) using 9-digit zip codes., Results: Of 1,214 BAs and 7,530 WAs with MS, BAs were younger, had lower education level, and were more likely to have Medicaid insurance or to be disabled or unemployed than WAs. BAs had worse self-reported disability (1.47-fold greater odds of severe vs mild disability, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18, 1.86) and worse performances on tests of cognitive processing speed (-5.06 fewer correct, 95% CI -5.72, -4.41), walking (0.66 seconds slower, 95% CI 0.36, 0.96), and manual dexterity (2.11 seconds slower, 95% CI 1.69, 2.54). BAs had more brain MRI lesions and lower overall and gray matter brain volumes, including reduced thalamic (-0.77 mL, 95% CI -0.91, -0.64), cortical (-30.63 mL, 95% CI -35.93, -25.33), and deep (-1.58 mL, 95% CI -1.92, -1.23) gray matter volumes. While lower SES correlated with worse neuroperformance scores in WAs, this association was less clear in BAs., Conclusion: We observed a greater burden of disease in BAs with MS relative to WAs with MS, despite adjustment for SES indicators. Beyond SES, future longitudinal studies should also consider roles of other societal constructs (e.g., systemic racism). Such studies will be important for identifying prognostic factors; developing optimal treatment strategies among BAs with MS is warranted., (© 2021 American Academy of Neurology.)

Background: EXTEND (NCT01797965), an open-label extension study, evaluated the safety and efficacy of daclizumab beta in participants with relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) who had completed the randomized DECIDE study., Methods: Eligible participants who received either daclizumab beta or interferon beta-1a in DECIDE received daclizumab beta 150 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks for up to 5 years in EXTEND, followed by 24 weeks of post-dosing follow-up. Safety and tolerability were evaluated, as were clinical efficacy and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). EXTEND was terminated ahead of schedule by the sponsors., Results: The total safety population ( N  = 1203) received at least one dose of daclizumab beta in EXTEND. In the DECIDE and EXTEND combined periods, the median number of doses of daclizumab beta was 53; median time on treatment was 196 weeks. By 24 September 2018, the end of the study, 110/1203 (9%) participants had completed the protocol-specified treatment period and 1101/1203 (92%) had experienced an adverse event (AE). The most commonly reported AEs were MS relapse, nasopharyngitis, and upper respiratory tract infection. Hepatic events (18%), cutaneous events (45%), and infections (62%) were common treatment-related AEs. The incidence of serious AEs was 29%, most commonly MS relapse and infections. The incidence of immune-mediated disorders was 2%; three of seven were encephalitis. Two of six deaths were considered treatment related. In participants who received continuous daclizumab beta throughout DECIDE and EXTEND, the treatment effects on clinical and MRI outcomes were maintained for up to 6 years., Conclusion: Results from the combined DECIDE-EXTEND study elucidate outcomes of longer-term treatment with daclizumab beta in the clinical trial setting and underscore the importance of pharmacovigilance with immunomodulatory therapies in the real-world setting., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: LK reports funding to his institution (University Hospital Basel) in the last 3 years used exclusively for research support; steering committee, advisory board, and consultancy fees from Actelion, Addex, Bayer, Biogen, Celgene, Genzyme, Merck, Mitsubishi, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Santhera; speaker fees from Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi, and Teva; support of educational activities from Bayer, Biogen, CSL Behring, Genzyme, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi, and Teva; license fees for Neurostatus products; and grants from Bayer, Biogen, European Union, Innosuisse, Merck, Novartis, Roche Research Foundation, Swiss MS Society, and Swiss National Research Foundation. SC reports speaking honoraria from and/or advisory boards for Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, EMD Serono, Novartis, Pear Therapeutics, Roche Genentech, and Sanofi Genzyme; and research support from AbbVie, Acorda, Actelion, Biogen, MedDay, Novartis, Roche Genentech, and Sanofi Genzyme. DLA reports consultant fees and/or grants from Acorda, Adelphi, Alkermes, Biogen, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Celgene, Frequency Therapeutics, Genentech, Genzyme, Immune Tolerance Network, Immunotec, International Progressive MS Alliance, MedDay, Merck Serono, MS Society of Canada, Novartis, Pfizer, Receptos, Roche, and Sanofi and an equity interest in NeuroRx Research. RRR is an employee of and holds stock/stock options in AbbVie. JH was a former employee of and holds stock/stock options in AbbVie. BP was a former employee of and holds stock/stock options in Biogen. SF, SX and WC-B are employees of and hold stock/stock options in Biogen. The EXTEND study and these analyses were funded by Biogen (Cambridge, MA, USA) and AbbVie (Redwood City, CA, USA)., (© The Author(s), 2021.)

Objective: SELECTED, an open-label extension study, evaluated daclizumab beta treatment for up to 6 years in participants with relapsing multiple sclerosis who completed the randomized SELECT/SELECTION studies. We report final results of SELECTED., Methods: Eligible participants who completed 1-2 years of daclizumab beta treatment in SELECT/SELECTION received daclizumab beta 150 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks for up to 6 years in SELECTED. Safety assessments were evaluated for the SELECTED treatment period; efficacy data were evaluated from first dose of daclizumab beta in SELECT/SELECTION., Results: Ninety percent (410/455) of participants who completed treatment in SELECTION enrolled in SELECTED. Within SELECTED, 69% of participants received daclizumab beta for > 3 years, 39% for > 4 years, and 9% for > 5 years; 87% of participants experienced an adverse event and 26% a serious adverse event (excluding multiple sclerosis relapse). No deaths occurred. Overall, hepatic events were reported in 25% of participants; serious hepatic events in 2%. There were no confirmed cases of immune-mediated encephalitis. Based on weeks from the first daclizumab beta dose in SELECT/SELECTION, adjusted annualized relapse rate (95% confidence interval) for weeks 0-24 was 0.21 (0.16-0.29) and remained low on continued treatment. Overall incidence of 24-week confirmed disability progression was 17.4%. Mean numbers of new/newly enlarging T2 hyperintense lesions remained low; percentage change in whole brain volume decreased over time., Conclusions: The effects of daclizumab beta on clinical and radiologic outcomes were sustained for up to ~ 8 years of treatment. No new safety concerns were identified in SELECTED., Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01051349; first registered on January 15, 2010.

Background: Reversible lymphocyte count reductions have occurred following daclizumab beta treatment for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis., Objective: To analyse total and differential lymphocyte levels and relationship with infection status., Methods: In DECIDE, blood samples were collected at 12-week intervals from daclizumab beta- ( n = 919) or intramuscular interferon beta-1a-treated ( n = 922) patients. Infections/serious infections were assessed proximate to grade 2/3 lymphopenia or low CD4 + /CD8 + T-cell counts. Total safety population (TSP) data were additionally analysed from the entire clinical development programme ( n = 2236)., Results: Over 96 weeks in DECIDE, mean absolute lymphocyte count (ALC), CD4 + and CD8 + T-cell counts decreased <10% (7.1% vs 1.6%, 9.7% vs 2.0%, 9.3% vs 5.9%: daclizumab beta vs interferon beta-1a, respectively); shifts to ALC below lower limit of normal occurred in 13% versus 15%, respectively. Grade 3 lymphopenia was uncommon (TSP: <1%) and transient. Lymphocyte changes generally occurred within 24 weeks after treatment initiation and were reversible within 12 weeks of discontinuation. In DECIDE, mean CD4 + /CD8 + T-cell counts were similar regardless of infection status. TSP data were consistent with DECIDE., Conclusion: When observed, ALC and CD4 + /CD8 + T-cell count decreases in daclizumab beta-treated patients were generally mild-to-modest, reversible upon treatment discontinuation and not associated with increased risk of infections, including opportunistic infections.

Background: Cognitive impairment is common in multiple sclerosis (MS), with cognitive processing speed being the most frequently affected domain., Objective: Examine the effects of daclizumab beta versus intramuscular (IM) interferon (IFN) beta-1a on cognitive processing speed as assessed by Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT)., Methods: In DECIDE, patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) (age: 18-55 years; Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score 0-5.0) were randomized to daclizumab beta ( n = 919) or IM IFN beta-1a ( n = 922) for 96-144 weeks. SDMT was administered at baseline and at 24-week intervals., Results: At week 96, significantly greater mean improvement from baseline in SDMT was observed with daclizumab beta versus IM IFN beta-1a ( p = 0.0274). Significantly more patients treated with daclizumab beta showed clinically meaningful improvement in SDMT (increase from baseline of ⩾3 points ( p = 0.0153) or ⩾4 points ( p = 0.0366)), and significantly fewer patients showed clinically meaningful worsening (decrease from baseline of ⩾3 points ( p = 0.0103)). Odds representing risk of worsening versus stability or improvement on SDMT were significantly smaller for daclizumab beta ( p = 0.0088 (3-point threshold); p = 0.0267 (4-point threshold)). In patients completing 144 weeks of treatment, the effects of daclizumab beta were generally sustained., Conclusion: These results provide evidence for a benefit of daclizumab beta versus IM IFN beta-1a on cognitive processing speed in RRMS., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01064401 (Efficacy and Safety of BIIB019 (Daclizumab High Yield Process) Versus Interferon β 1a in Participants With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (DECIDE)): https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01064401 .

Primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) is a chronic demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS) currently lacking any effective treatment. Promoting endogenous brain repair offers a potential strategy to halt and possibly restore neurologic function in PPMS. To understand how the microenvironment within white matter lesions plays a role in repair we have focused on neural progenitor cells (NPCs) since these are found in lesions in PPMS and have been found to influence oligodendrocyte progenitor cell maturation (OPCs). To better understand the cellular nature of NPCs in PPMS we developed iPS cells from blood samples of PPMS patients and age matched non-disease spouse or blood relative controls. Using these iPS cell lines we determined that the NPCs from PPMS cases provided no neuroprotection against active CNS demyelination compared to NPCs from control iPS lines which were capable of completely preventing injury. Conditioned media (CM) from PPMS NPCs provides no protection to OPCs and prevents maturation of OPCs into oligodendrocytes in vitro. We also found that CM from PPMS iPS NPCs elicited patient-specific differences in the response to compounds that should foster oligodendrocyte (OL) maturation. Together, these data establish a new model for understanding the nature of myelination defects in PPMS which may lead to novel targeted approaches for preventing demyelination in these patients., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Cutaneous adverse events (AEs) have been observed in clinical studies of daclizumab high-yield process (HYP) in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Here, we report cutaneous AEs observed in the randomized, double-blind, active-comparator DECIDE study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01064401)., Methods: DECIDE was a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled phase 3 study of daclizumab HYP 150 mg subcutaneous every 4 weeks versus interferon (IFN) beta-1a 30 mcg intramuscular (IM) once weekly in RRMS. Treatment-emergent AEs were classified and recorded by investigators. Investigators also assessed the severity of each AE, and whether it met the criteria for a serious AE. Cutaneous AEs were defined as AEs coded to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities System Organ Class of skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders. The incidence, severity, onset, resolution, and management of AEs were analyzed by treatment group., Results: Cutaneous AEs were reported in 37% of daclizumab HYP-treated patients and 19% of IFN beta-1a-treated patients. The most common investigator-reported cutaneous AEs with daclizumab HYP were rash (7%) and eczema (4%). Most patients with cutaneous AEs remained on treatment (daclizumab HYP, 81%; IM IFN beta-1a, 90%) and had events that were mild or moderate (94% and 98%) and subsequently resolved (78% and 82%). Most patients with cutaneous AEs did not require treatment with corticosteroids or were treated with topical corticosteroids (daclizumab HYP, 73%; IM IFN beta-1a, 81%). Serious cutaneous AEs were reported in 14 (2%) daclizumab HYP patients and one (<1%) IM IFN beta-1a patient., Conclusion: There was an increased risk of cutaneous AEs with daclizumab HYP. While physicians should be aware of the potential for serious cutaneous AEs, the typical cutaneous AEs were mild-to-moderate in severity, manageable, and resolved over time., Funding: Biogen and AbbVie Biotherapeutics Inc., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01064401.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a potentially disabling chronic autoimmune neurological disease that mainly affects young adults. Our understanding of the pathophysiology of MS has significantly advanced in the past quarter of a century. This has led to the development of many disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) that prevent exacerbations and new lesions in patients with relapsing remitting MS (RRMS). So far there is no drug available that can completely halt the neurodegenerative changes associated with the disease. It is the purpose of this review to provide concise information regarding mechanism of action, indications, side effects and safety of Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency approved agents for MS, emerging therapies, and drugs that can be considered for off-label use in MS.

Purpose of Review: This review focuses on recent advances in the understanding and management of symptoms and dysfunctions associated with multiple sclerosis (MS)., Recent Findings: A broad spectrum of dysfunctions associated with MS are under investigation. Research published in the past year and a half addresses gait dysfunction, exercise training, fatigue, bowel/bladder and sexual dysfunction, and sleep disruption. Functional electrical stimulation and strength training have been validated for improvement in gait and motor function. Exercise training has been shown to benefit mood and quality of life scores and to reduce circulating inflammatory cytokine levels. Fatigue remains a challenging problem with incremental improvements in understanding of underlying causes and effective drug therapies offered by recent work. Treatment of bowel, bladder and sexual dysfunction utilizing a variety of modalities has been investigated with some progress., Summary: In the absence of treatments to reverse neurologic injury due to MS, effective symptom management and functional improvement remain essential to mitigate disability and maintain quality of life. Basic research, as well as controlled clinical trials, in this realm offers promising insights and solutions.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common cause of progressive neurological disability in young adults. In addition to spasticity, tremors, weakness, sensory disturbances, depression, cognitive problems, and bladder or bowel dysfunction, sexual dysfunction (SD) is also a prevalent and destructive manifestation of the disease that severely affects quality of life. Evaluation of this disorder requires insight into the primary (changes that directly affect libido, sexual response and orgasm due to direct damage to the nervous system), secondary (complaints which are related to the physical disability of MS, such as fatigue, muscle rigidity, weakness and spasms), and tertiary (emotional, social and cultural aspects of MS) components of MS-associated SD. Given the complexity and multifactorial nature of SD, a multidisciplinary approach is necessary when treating patients with MS. The aim of this Review is to provide a holistic approach to the evaluation and management of SD in patients with MS, incorporating the latest data from the fields of urology, neurology, nursing, social work, and psychology. What is currently known regarding the evaluation and management of SD in patients with MS will be presented from the perspective of these specialties.