Search

Background: Aortic graft infection represents one of the most challenging and life-threatening complication of surgical and endovascular treatment of aortic pathologies. The aim of this study was to report the results of a single center with in-situ revascularization for the treatment of aortic graft infections using the neo-aorto-iliac system (NAIS) and to review the literature about this surgical technique., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed our aortic graft infection case series and in-situ revascularization using the neo-aorto-iliac system. The study was conducted from January 2009 to June 2020. The primary outcomes analyzed were early mortality (<30 days), late mortality (>30 days), reinfection rate. Secondary outcomes were the primary patency rate, the secondary patency rate, and the lower limb salvage rate. A literature review of the last twenty years was performed on international medical databases Pubmed (Medline), Scopus and Web of Science., Results: During study period, 12 patients, all male (median age of 69 years [range: 52-87 years]), underwent to infected graft explantation and revascularization by NAIS using femoral-popliteal veins. Six cases were complicated by aorto-enteric fistulas, five were duodenal and one was colon. Patients spent the immediate postoperative period in the Intensive Care Unit for a median time of 4 days (range: 0-9 days). The median length of hospital stay was 27.5 days (range: 1-66 days). The mean follow-up was 21.5 months (range: 0-120). The 30-day mortality rate was 25% (3 patients) due to postoperative complications. No patient dropped out of the follow-up protocol. The primary patency rate was 92% while the secondary patency rate was 100%. No patient underwent lower limb amputation. Persistence of infection occurred in 1 case (8.3%). Overall Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were 75% for 30 days, 50% for 1 year, 48% for 5 years. Literature analysis identified 19 case series., Conclusions: The literature regarding NAIS has low statistical evidence due to retrospective design of the studies. Our results are in agreement with retrospective studies in the literature. When the surgical team is confident with NAIS, this technique should be considered the preferred method, considering an acceptable and comparable mortality rate with other techniques and a better rate of patency, resistance to graft degeneration, recurrent infections and amputation rate.

Background: To assess imaging findings, describe endovascular technical aspects and analyzed procedural outcomes in a population of patients underwent limb arteriovenous malformation (LAVMs)., Methods: From January 2015 to December 2018, all consecutive patients underwent an endovascular procedure for ICD-9-CM codex for arteriovenous malformation problems were retrospective reviewed. Among these, patients with LAVMs were selected. Demographic, preoperative imaging, interventional and postprocedural data were collected for each patient and procedure. The International Society of Vascular Anomalies, the Cho-Do angiographic classification and the Schobinger clinical stage were used to describe disease type, aspect and clinical severity. Angiographic and clinical outcomes were also described., Results: During the study period, 76 intervention for AVMs were performed in 52 patients. Among these, 26 LAVMs were selected and analyzed in 21 patients (number of LAVMs per patient: 1.2±0.5), 14 affecting upper limbs, 17 lower limbs. Pain, discomfort and swelling were main symptoms reported (95%, 90% and 62%, respectively). Ultrasound scan, computed angiography tomography and magnetic resonance angiography were used - alone or in combination - as preoperative imaging in 67%, 62% and 48% of patients, respectively. Cho-Do class ≥3 was described in 70% of treated LAVMs and a Schobinger stage ≥2 in more than 90%. Ipsilateral femoral access with a 5F introducer was preferred. Selective embolization with glue was the most preferred technique (57%), in combination or not with microsphere embolization (19%) and/or direct nidus sclerotherapy (14%). Optimal and suboptimal results were achieved in 86% of cases. Further interventions were performed in 52% of cases, with more than two interventions in 29% of cases., Conclusions: Quality of life, clinical picture and anatomical structure are items of paramount importance during preoperative LAVMs endovascular treatment planning. Treatment must be focused on LAVMs type, minimizing invasiveness and number of interventions, although secondary intervention rate remains quite high.

We report a case of a celiac trunk stenting using a steerable guiding catheter, to fix a residual endoleak following fenestrated endovascular repair (FEVAR) of a thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA). A systematic search of the literature about the use of steerable catheters was also performed on Pubmed according to the PRISMA Guidelines, including all papers in which the device was used for in vivo endovascular procedures. In our case report, the patient had undergone a failed attempt of cannulation due to the presence of a severely angulated and stenosed ostium of the vessel. A steerable catheter was then used to fix the residual endoleak. The search of the Literature retrieved 544 papers. Of them, 13 met the inclusion criteria and were therefore assessed. The use of steerable sheaths and catheters was reported as effective and safe for the cannulation of 157 target vessels in 131 endovascular procedures, with a success rate of 95.5% and no complications. The use of a steerable guiding catheter in our experience was safe and effective for the selective cannulation of a severely stenosed and angulated celiac trunk, to correct a residual endoleak after FEVAR for TAAA. Steerable catheters could be useful tools for the selective cannulation of target vessels with a challenging ostium., (© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: To evaluate clinical pictures, symptoms and etiology of recurrent varices after surgery (REVAS) through a clinical and color-Doppler-ultrasound scan (CDUS) analysis., Methods: During a three-year period, data about 9043 consecutive outpatients were collected. Among these, 160 patients (1.8%) were affected by REVAS. Data about risk factors, types of primary vein surgery, symptoms, clinical and CDUS characteristics were analyzed using the Clinical, Etiology, Anatomy and Pathophysiology (CEAP), Stonebridge and Perrin classifications in order to evaluate clinical and anatomical varices patterns., Results: Family history for chronic venous disease (90%), sedentary lifestyle (61.9%) and obesity (11.9%) were the most representative risk factors. REVAS symptoms were rather heterogeneous, although only 10% of cases was fully asymptomatic. CEAP classification showed a prevalence of C2 and C3 class (56.3% and 35% respectively). About half of inguinal REVAS was connected from a great saphenous vein residual stump (Stonebridge type 1). Lower limb perforating veins resulted associated to REVAS in 43.8% of cases., Conclusions: REVAS remain a major and still unsolved problem in patients following varicose veins surgery. Their clinical pictures and symptoms are heterogeneous and require a watchful analysis in order to identify both etiology and natural history.