Search

Background: The addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy improved outcomes for patients with metastatic colon cancer. E5204 was designed to test whether the addition of bevacizumab to mFOLFOX6, following neoadjuvant chemoradiation and definitive surgery, could improve overall survival (OS) in patients with stage II/III adenocarcinoma of the rectum., Subjects, Materials, and Methods: Patients with stage II/III rectal cancer who had completed neoadjuvant 5-fluorouracil-based chemoradiation and had undergone complete resection were enrolled. Patients were randomized to mFOLFOX6 (Arm A) or mFOLFOX6 with bevacizumab (Arm B) administered every 2 weeks for 12 cycles., Results: E5204 registered only 355 patients (17% of planned accrual goal) as it was terminated prematurely owing to poor accrual. At a median follow-up of 72 months, there was no difference in 5-year overall survival (88.3% vs. 83.7%) or 5-year disease-free survival (71.2% vs. 76.5%) between the two arms. The rate of treatment-related grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) was 68.8% on Arm A and 70.7% on Arm B. Arm B had a higher proportion of patients who discontinued therapy early as a result of AEs and patient withdrawal than did Arm A (32.4% vs. 21.5%, p = .029).The most common grade 3-4 treatment-related AEs were neutropenia, leukopenia, neuropathy, diarrhea (without prior colostomy), and fatigue., Conclusion: At 17% of its planned accrual, E5204 did not meet its primary endpoint. The addition of bevacizumab to FOLFOX6 in the adjuvant setting did not significantly improve OS in patients with stage II/III rectal cancer., Implications for Practice: At 17% of its planned accrual, E5204 was terminated early owing to poor accrual. At a median follow-up of 72 months, there was no significant difference in 5-year overall survival (88.3% vs. 83.7%) or in 5-year disease-free survival (71.2% vs. 76.5%) between the two arms. Despite significant advances in the treatment of rectal cancer, especially in improving local control rates, the risk of distant metastases and the need to further improve quality of life remain a challenge. Strategies combining novel agents with chemoradiation to improve both distant and local control are needed., (© AlphaMed Press 2019.)

Purpose: Sufficient data are currently unavailable to assist in defining suitable regimens for patients ≥ 70 years with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Methods: Chemonaïve patients with a performance status (PS) of 0 or 1 and stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were randomized to gemcitabine 1000mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 plus carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) 5.5 on day 1; the same schedule of gemcitabine plus paclitaxel 200mg/m(2) on day 1; or paclitaxel 225mg/m(2) on day 1 plus carboplatin AUC 6.0 on day 1. Cycles were every 21 days up to 6. Efficacy and toxicity results were compared by age groups., Results: Overall survival (OS) between patients <70 years (8.6 months, 95% CI: 7.9, 9.5) and ≥ 70 years (7.9 months, 95% CI: 7.1, 9.5) was similar. OS was 8.8 months (95% CI: 7.5, 10.3) among patients 70-74 years, 6.5 months (95% CI: 5.6, 9.3) among patients 75-79 years, and 7.9 months (95% CI: 6.3, 10.3) among patients ≥ 80 years. OS was lower among patients 75-79 years compared with patients 70-74 years (P=0.04). Compared with patients <70 years, patients ≥ 70 years experienced similar rates of myelosuppresion, but younger patients experienced more vomiting and nausea. There was no clear pattern with respect to differences in efficacy by treatments across age groups., Conclusions: Based on the similarity of patient outcomes across age groups, doublet chemotherapy is feasible among carefully selected elderly patients with good PS., (2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To investigate the effect of race on the efficacy and safety of standard chemotherapy doublet regimens in African American patients, we conducted a subgroup analysis of a phase III randomized trial., Patients and Methods: Chemonaïve patients with a performance status of 0 or 1 and stage IIIB or IV non-small cell lung cancer were randomized to arm A: gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 plus carboplatin area under the curve 5.5 on day 1; arm B: the same schedule of gemcitabine plus paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 on day 1; or arm C: paclitaxel 225 mg/m2 on day 1 plus carboplatin area under the curve 6.0 on day 1. Cycles were repeated every 21 days up to 6. A site selection tool identified institutions with potential to recruit a minority population. Outcome and toxicity data of white and African American patients were compared., Results: Of 1135 total patients, 972 were white (85.6%) and 138 were African American (12.2%). Median survival was 8.3 months for white patients (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.7-9.3) and 9.1 months for African American patients (95% CI: 8.2-11.1). Response rates were 29.1 and 29.0%, respectively. Rates of grade 3 or 4 toxicities were comparable. Among African Americans, median survival was 7.2 months (95% CI: 5.1-10.1) for gemcitabine-carboplatin (n = 47), 10.5 months (95% CI: 7.1-15.4) for gemcitabine-paclitaxel (n = 42), and 10.2 months (95% CI: 8.5-13.2) for paclitaxel-carboplatin (n = 49)., Conclusion: Whites and African Americans had similar outcomes, although there was some variability in survival among African Americans across the three treatment groups.

Background: Paclitaxel-carboplatin is used as the standard regimen for patients with advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This trial was designed to compare gemcitabine + carboplatin or gemcitabine + paclitaxel to the standard regimen., Patients and Methods: A total of 1135 chemonaive patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were randomly allocated to receive gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 plus carboplatin area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) 5.5 on day 1 (GC), gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 plus paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2) on day 1 (GP), or paclitaxel 225 mg/m(2) plus carboplatin AUC 6.0 on day 1 (PC). Stratification was based on disease stage, baseline weight loss, and presence or absence of brain metastases. Cycles were repeated every 21 days for up to six cycles or disease progression., Results: Median survival (months) with GC was 7.9 compared with 8.5 for GP and 8.7 for PC. Response rates (RRs) were as follows: GC, 25.3%; GP, 32.1%; and PC, 29.8%. The GC arm was associated with a greater incidence of grade 3 or 4 hematologic events but a lower rate of neurotoxicity and alopecia when compared with GP and PC., Conclusions: Non-platinum and non-paclitaxel gemcitabine-containing doublets demonstrate similar overall survival and RR compared with the standard PC regimen. However, the treatment arms had distinct toxicity profiles.

Purpose: To update and expand on previously published clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of cancer treatment-induced diarrhea., Methods: An expert multidisciplinary panel was convened to review the recent literature and discuss recommendations for updating the practice guidelines previously published by this group in the Journal of Clinical Oncology in 1998. MEDLINE searches were performed and the relevant literature published since 1998 was reviewed by all panel members. The treatment recommendations and algorithm were revised by panel consensus., Results: A recent review of early toxic deaths occurring in two National Cancer Institute-sponsored cooperative group trials of irinotecan plus high-dose fluorouracil and leucovorin for advanced colorectal cancer has led to the recognition of a life-threatening gastrointestinal syndrome and highlighted the need for vigilant monitoring and aggressive therapy for this serious complication. Loperamide remains the standard therapy for uncomplicated cases. However, the revised guidelines reflect the need for recognition of the early warning signs of complicated cases of diarrhea and the need for early and aggressive management, including the addition of antibiotics. Management of radiation-induced diarrhea is similar but may not require hospitalization, and chronic low- to intermediate-grade symptoms can be managed with continued loperamide., Conclusion: With vigilant monitoring and aggressive therapy for cancer treatment-induced diarrhea, particularly in patients with early warning signs of severe complications, morbidity and mortality may be reduced.

Purpose: Patients with locally advanced, initially unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have a median survival time of 9 to 11 months, a 2-year survival rate of 13%, and a long-term survival rate of 5% to 7% when treated with radical thoracic radiation alone. Because of the preclinical radiosensitizing capabilities of 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin and the therapeutic synergy of etoposide and cisplatin, we combined these agents with full-dose radical thoracic radiation to determine the feasibility and efficacy of this approach in locally advanced NSCLC., Methods: Patients with clinical stage IIIb and bulky IIIa NSCLC and ECOG performance status 0 or 1 received 5-fluorouracil infusion (640-800 mg/m2/d CVI days 1-5, 29-34), cisplatin (20 mg/m2/d, days 1-5, 29-34), etoposide (50 mg/m2, days 1, 3, 5, 29, 31, 33) and concurrent thoracic radiation (60 Gy/2 Gy/d/30 Fx). Patients with adequate cytoreduction proceeded to surgical resection., Results: From March 1987 to July 1990, 41 patients were enrolled on study; 40 are evaluable. The objective response rate was 90%. Thirteen patients (39%), five with clinical stage IIIb disease and eight with IIIa disease, underwent thoracotomy and resection; three proved to have pathological complete remissions. Ten of 77 chemotherapy courses were complicated by neutropenic fever. Grade 3 or 4 esophagitis occurred in 21 patients (52%). Cardiac ischemia or infarction occurred in two patients (5%). There were seven deaths in the first 6 months in the absence of disease progression. Two-year survival was 38%, 3-year survival 25%, and 4- to 5-year survival 18%. Six patients (15%) remain alive at the median follow-up time of 66 months (range, 64-84)., Conclusions: Despite substantial early morbidity and mortality, concurrent, aggressive chemoradiation produced a long-term survival rate in locally advanced NSCLC comparable to other combined modality approaches. However toxicity, particularly esophagitis and postoperative complications, preclude the use of this regimen in phase III studies. Combined modality approaches for locally advanced, initially unresectable NSCLC have become standard; research must simultaneously focus on ways to enhance efficacy and reduce toxicity.

Macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) is a known inducer of proliferation and differentiation of cells of the mononuclear phagocyte lineage, and gamma-interferon (gamma-IFN) is a known activator of mononuclear phagocytes. In this Phase I clinical trial of combined therapy with M-CSF and gamma-IFN, 36 patients were treated with 14-day continuous infusions of M-CSF at doses ranging from 10 to 140 micrograms/kg/day. In all but five patients, gamma-IFN was administered by daily s.c. injection on days 8-14 of the M-CSF infusion at doses of 0.05 or 0.1 mg/m2/day. A total of 73 courses of M-CSF and 66 courses of gamma-IFN were administered. The maximally tolerated dose combination was 120 micrograms/kg/day M-CSF, 0.1 mg/m2/day gamma-IFN. The addition of gamma-IFN did not alter the maximally tolerated dose of M-CSF therapy, although some additional toxicities were noted with combined therapy. At the 140-micrograms/kg/day M-CSF dose level, grade 4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 2 of 3 patients, with a median platelet count nadir of 26,000/mm3 after 7-10 days of M-CSF infusion. At this dose level, there was one reversible grade 3 hepatic toxicity, and one grade 3 exacerbation of underlying chronic obstructive lung disease. Peripheral blood monocytosis was observed at all M-CSF dose levels exceeding 40 micrograms/kg/day, approaching 3-fold elevations at the 100-micrograms/kg/day M-CSF dose level. The induction of monocytosis was correlated with the development of thrombocytopenia. At the conclusion of therapy with 100 micrograms/kg/day M-CSF, 0.1 mg/m2/day gamma-IFN, 78% of peripheral blood monocytes expressed the low affinity Fc gamma receptor for aggregated immunoglobulin, Fc gamma RIII (CD16), and CD14 was expressed by only 36% of the cells. This phenotype has been shown previously to be associated with cellular activation. In contrast, 35% of monocytes from patients treated with M-CSF therapy alone at the same dose expressed CD16 and 88% expressed CD14. A partial clinical response was noted in a patient with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, and minor clinical responses were observed in patients with a diffuse/follicular lymphoma, metastatic renal cell carcinoma, and metastatic thymoma. At M-CSF doses exceeding 20 micrograms/kg/day within the maximally tolerated dose range, gamma-IFN did not modulate the ability of M-CSF to reliably induce peripheral blood monocytosis. This study shows that M-CSF and gamma-IFN therapy induces the proliferation and differentiation of circulating mononuclear phagocytes.

Eighty-eight postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer, in whom estrogen receptors (ER) were positive or unknown, were treated on a controlled trial to determine the effectiveness of tamoxifen and to assess the therapeutic advantage of sequentially adding low-dose cyclophosphamide-methotrexate-5-fluorouracil (CMF) chemotherapy in tamoxifen responders. Patients with known ER negative status were not studied. After the initial 12-week treatment with tamoxifen alone, 60% of ER positive patients achieved complete or partial response as did 35% in whom ER were unknown. Response status further improved in 18% randomized to continue tamoxifen alone vs 31% in whom CMF was added to tamoxifen. There were no statistically significant differences in time to the development of progressive disease or survival between the ER positive and ER unknown patients or between the tamoxifen and tamoxifen plus CMF groups. We conclude that inability to determine ER status should not prejudice against the use of tamoxifen in postmenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer. No benefit has been demonstrated from the addition of CMF chemotherapy in tamoxifen responders.

Seventy-eight advanced breast cancer patients with hormone-resistant disease or visceral metastases were randomized to receive either of two low dose regimens consisting of cyclophosphamide (C), methotrexate (M), 5-fluorouracil (F), and Adriamycin (A) as their initial chemotherapy. One group was treated with CAMF, and the other with CMF until progression, followed by A (CMF leads to A). C was given at 50 mg/m2, po, days 1-14; M at 20 mg/m2, F at 300 mg/m2, and A at 20 mg/m2, iv, days 1 and 8 of each 28-day cycle. The response rates for CAMF vs. CMF did not differ significantly (complete and partial responses-62% vs. 49%; stabilizations-23% vs. 31%). Responses by site of metasis, median times to progression and median survivals were similar for both groups. Poor and good risk partial responders had similar survivals. Twelve percent of CMF patients treated with Adriamycin at the time of progression had partial responses with an associated improved survival. Since CMF is as effective as CAMF, but has less toxicity, low dose therapy with CMF is more acceptable than CAMF as an initial chemotherapy regimen for metastatic breast cancer. Adriamycin may be reserved for subsequent regression induction.

Eighty-nine postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer, in whom estrogen receptors (ER) were positive or unknown, were treated on a controlled trial to determine the effectiveness of tamoxifen and to assess the therapeutic advantage of sequentially adding low-dose cyclophosphamide-methotrexate-5-fluorouracil (CMF) chemotherapy in tamoxifen responders. Patients with known ER negative status were not studied. After the initial 12 week treatment with tamoxifen alone, 59% of ER positive patients achieved complete or partial response as did 35% in whom ER were unknown. Response status further improved in 18% randomized to continue tamoxifen alone vs. 28% in whom CMF was added to tamoxifen. There were no statistically significant differences in time to the development of progressive disease or survival between the ER positive and ER unknown patients or between the tamoxifen and tamoxifen plus CMF groups. We conclude that inability to determine ER status should not prejudice against the use of tamoxifen in postmenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer. As yet, no benefit has been demonstrated from the addition of CMF chemotherapy in tamoxifen responders.

Sixty breast cancer patients with hormone-resistant metastatic disease who had progressed after chemotherapy with low-dose cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) or with L-phenylalanine mustard underwent treatment with a low-dose Adriamycin regimen,i.e., 20 mg/m2, intravenously on days 1 and 8 every 28 days. Two percent of patients had complete responses; 25%, partial responses; 38%, stabilization; and 35%, progression. The time to progression for the responders was similar to that of the stabilized patients, while the responders and stabilized patients survived significantly longer than did the progressors. Responses were seen in nodal, hepatic, dermal/subcutaneous, bone, pulmonary, and peritoneal metastases. The toxicity was mild: 18% of patients had leukocyte counts of less than 3,000/mm3; 10% had platelet counts of less than 90,000/mm3, 22% experience vomiting; and 33% had hair loss. No patient experienced local venous/subcutaneous toxicity or heart failure. Since this regimen of low-dose Adriamycin appears to be as effective as, but less toxic than, the secondary standard-dose of Adriamycin at 60--75 mg/m2 every three weeks, a randomized trial of low-dose Adriamycin vs. standard-dose Adriamycin should be conducted in metastatic breast cancer patients who have previously undergone chemotherapy.

Encouraging results of the combination of upper hemibody irradiation (UHBI) and local chest irradiation (LCI) combined withh standard-dose chemotherapy in patients with extensive small cell bronchogenic carcinoma led us to a second pilot study utilizing the same radiation program combined wit high-dose induction chemotherapy. Fourteen patients with small cell bronchogenic carcinoma, five with extensive disease and nine with localized disease, were treated with cyclophosphamide (1.5 g/m2 iv, Days 1 and 22), lomustine (70 mg/m2 orally, Day 1), and methotrexate (15 mg/m2 twice weekly during Weeks 2, 3, 5, and 6). UHBI (600 rads) was given during Week 6 in a single dose and LCI was given during Week 7 (2000 rads/five fractions) to the tumor and mediastinum. Maintenance chemotherapy began in Week 12 with cyclophosphamide (700 mg/m2 iv every 3 weeks) and lomustine (70 mg/m2 orally every 6 weeks). Twelve patients were evaluable for response and toxicity (eight with limited disease). There were three complete response and seven partial responses after induction chemotherapy. After completion of the consolidation radiation therapy, all 12 patients had a response: six complete responses and six partial responses. Acute toxic effects included nausea and vomiting in eight patients, fever in five, and hypotension and angina in one. Subacute toxic effects included nausea, vomiting, and dehydration in two patients who required hospitalization, prolonged aplasia in one, reversible radiation esophagitis in three. Three patients had radiation pneumonitis including one with bilateral diffuse disease that led to death from respiratory failure. Only two of 12 patients received their maintenance therapy on schedule. Treatment failures occurred within the LCI field in seven patients and in distant metastatic sites in six. The median time to first relapse was 7 months and the median survival was 9 months. Because of toxicity, treatment delays, and poor survival in this group of patients, we cannot recommend this combined modality approach.

Forty-three evaluable patients with ovarian cancer who had failed one or more chemotherapy regimens were treated with mitomycin iv at 28-day intervals. Thirty-six patients with good bone marrow reserve received 10 mg/m2 and seven patients with poor bone marrow reserve received 6.7 mg/m2 initially. Ten patients (23%) responded. Patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1 had better response rates and survivals as compared to patients with a performance status of 2-4 (44% vs 8%; median survival, 8 vs 4 months). The acute hematologic and gastrointestinal toxicity was minimal. No patients developed pulmonary, renal, cardiovascular, or local tissue toxicity.

Thirty (30) patients with advanced metastatic malignant melanoma refractory to DTIC (NSC-45388) and a nitrosourea were treated with 5-azacytidine (NSC-102816). 5-Azacytidine was administered subcutaneously at a dosage of 100 mg/m2/day for 10 days. Twenty-six (26) patients were evaluable for toxicity and response. Major organ toxicities were hematologic, gastrointestinal, and cutaneous; no antitumor activity was noted.

Informed consent is an issue of major importance for cancer patients and for the practitioners who treat them. Recently, the President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research emphasized the educational goals of the consent process. Nevertheless, past research confirms that these goals are difficult to attain. In this paper, we present an overview of informed consent and describe a study of informed consent to cancer treatment conducted at the Fox Chase Cancer Center in which the consultation between the patient and physician (and/or other health professional) was observed and patients were interviewed. On the average, patients recalled less than 40% of what they were told. Patients who were told more items recalled more; however, they recalled a smaller proportion of what they were told. Several implications for health education are drawn from the study results.

A low-dose, three-drug regimen, C.M.F. (cyclophosphamide 50 mg, p.o., days 1-14; methotrexate, 25 mg, and 5-fluorouracil, 500 mg, i.v., days 1 and 8; cycled every 28 days) was used in 46 consecutive chemtherapy-eligible women (41 previously hormonally treated) with recurrent breast cancer. Thirteen percent of the patients had complete regressions (C.R.); 33% had partial regressions (P.R.); 26% stabilized; and 28% progressed. In evaluating response by sites of metastases, lymph nodes (30%), lung nodules (22%), and subcutaneous deposits (2/3) had the highest incidence of C.R.; 46-71% of patients with lymph node, lung, subcutaneous, liver, breast, or peritoneal disease showed C.R. or P.R. Skin and pleural disease responded in 30% of patients whereas no patients had radiographic healing of bony metastases. The toxicity was minimal: 7% gastrointestinal, 26% marrow-suppressive, and 7% infectious. This low-dose C.M.F. regimen resulted in regression resulted in regression rates similar to higher dose C.M.F. protocols, which use approximately twice these drug dosages with commensurate toxicity.

Seventy-three consecutive patients receiving cisplatin-containing chemotherapy regimens were treated with an initial dose of chlorpromazine (25 mg im), droperidol (1 mg iv, then 1 mg sc every 4 hours), and methylprednisolone (250 mg every 4 hours for four doses). Twenty patients received a combination chemotherapy protocol that included cisplatin at a dose of 40 mg/m2 iv (group 1) and 53 patients received a protocol that included cisplatin at a dose of 120 mg/m2 iv (group 2). The median age of all the patients was 58 years. Seventy-five percent of the patients in group 1 and 45% of those in group 2 had no vomiting at all; the remainder had limited and tolerable vomiting. These results in a group of elderly patients compare favorably with trials of other antiemetic programs.

Both ICRF-159 and methyl-CCNU are agents with antitumor activity against gastrointestinal carcinoma; hence the exploration of this combination for possible synergism. Results of the study involving 19 patients show that bone marrow toxicity is the limiting factor for this combination of drugs. Moreover, a dose of 130 mg/mg of MeCCNU with 800 mg/m2/day of ICRF is well tolerated.

Ninety evaluable metastatic breast cancer patients refractory to hormonal therapy and combinations of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil, and doxorubicin were treated with a low-dose mitomycin regimen, i.e., 10 mg/m2 intravenously every 28 days. In order to minimize thrombocytopenia, dose de-escalations related to platelet counts were made. One patient (1%) had a complete response and 17% had partial responses for a median duration of 4 months. The time to progression for the responders and stabilized patients was similar; however, the responders and stabilized patients lived significantly longer than did the progressors. Hematologic toxicity was minimized because of planned de-escalations in mitomycin dosage. Perivenous ulceration, both immediate and delayed (8%), congestive heart failure (2%), and heart-renal failure with malignant hypertension (2%) resulted in significant morbidity, including two drug-related deaths. Although mitomycin dosages were successfully titrated according to platelet counts in this group of chemotherapy-refractory patients, prolonged use of this drug in adjuvant or early metastatic breast cancer patients is not recommended because of potentially irreversible thrombocytopenia.

Thirty-eight evaluable patients with metastatic breast cancer refractory to hormonal therapy and multiple chemotherapy regimens were treated with mitolactol at a dose of 130 mg/m2/day orally for 10 days every 6 weeks. Only one patient, with nodal and chest wall metastases, had a sustained complete regression; two patients had stable disease; and 35 patients had disease progression. The toxicity, which was primarily hematologic, was acceptable.

Twenty-five patients with measurable metastatic melanoma refractory to DTIC and a nitrosourea were treated with dibromodulcitol (DBD). DBD was administered orally at bedtime at a dose of 100 mg/m2/day until hematologic toxicity (a greater than or equal to 50% decrease in the wbc or platelet count) was induced. Five patients experienced clinically useful objective remissions; responding lesions included both soft tissue metastases and visceral metastatic disease. It is concluded that DBD is useful in the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma and thus joins DTIC and the nitrosoureas as single agents which are active against this malignancy.

Thirty-seven previously untreated patients with advanced metastatic colorectal carcinoma were treated in a prospective randomized fashion with either ICRF-159 or 5-FU. The ICRF-159 was administered orally at a dose of 1 g/m2/day for 3 consecutive days every 3 weeks, and the 5-FU was given iv at a dose of 450 mg/m2/day for 5 days every 5 weeks. All patients were evaluated for response and toxic effects after two courses of treatment. All those who failed to meet the criteria for objective response with either a complete remission or a partial response received the other drug in a crossover fashion. Three of the 18 patients (16%) initially treated with 5-FU achieved a partial response while none of the 19 patients initially treated with ICRF-159 achieved a complete or partial response. Nine prior 5-FU-treated patients were crossed over to ICRF-159 and 14 prior ICRF-159-treated patients subsequently received 5-FU. No antitumor response was seen with the secondary agent in this study. The response rate for ICRF-159 (none of 19 patients) predicts that it is unlikely to produce a true response rate of greater than or equal to 20% with a rejection error of less than 5%, making it unsuitable as primary therapy for colon carcinoma. The toxicity of 5-FU was moderate and mainly gastrointestinal while the toxicity of ICRF-159 was severe and mainly hematologic.

ICRF-159, at a dose of 300 mg/m2, was given orally every 8 hours for nine doses every 21 days to 40 patients with metastatic breast cancer refractory to hormonal therapy and cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil, and adriamycin chemotherapy. Two patients with soft tissue disease had short-lived partial responses. The hematologic toxicity was severe. Three patients required rbc transfusions. Four patients became septic at the nadir of leukopenia; two of these patients died while leukopenic. Two patients had platelet counts less than 25,000/mm3. All patients who were nonevaluable or who had life-threatening or lethal toxicity were nonambulatory. Since the 19 nonambulatory patients had a median survival of only 1.25 months as compared to 7 months in ambulatory patients, it is recommended that future phase II trials in chemotherapy-refractory breast cancer be limited to ambulatory patients. Although ICRF-159 has minimal antineoplastic effects, it is not recommended for further investigations in metastatic breast cancer, even at more hematologically tolerable doses of 250 mg/m2 every 8 hours for nine doses.

Every physician at some time must manage pain associated with advanced cancer. In spite of the hopeless prognosis, the problem of pain deserves an intelligent appraisal and a systematic plan for relief to conserve the patients's physical, mental, and moral resources and social usefulness as long as possible. Selection of a method of tumor therapy from an array of laternatives demands study of the individual patient and careful consideration of the appropriate measures-the possibilities for success and the limitations, benefits, and risks.