Search

Since tamoxifen is widely used in breast cancer treatment and has been proposed for the prevention of breast cancer, its endometrial iatrogenic effects must be carefully examined. We have investigated the association between endometrial cancer and tamoxifen use or other treatments in women treated for breast cancer in a case-control study. Cases of endometrial cancer diagnosed after breast cancer (n = 135) and 467 controls matched for age, year of diagnosis of breast cancer and hospital and survival time with an intact uterus were included. Women who had received tamoxifen were significantly more likely to have endometrial cancer diagnosed than those who had not (crude relative risk = 4.9, p = 0.0001). Univariate and adjusted analyses showed that the risk increased with the length of treatment (p = 0.0001) or the cumulative dose of tamoxifen received (p = 0.0001), irrespective of the daily dose. Women who had undergone pelvic radiotherapy also had a higher risk (crude relative risk = 7.8, p = 0.0001). After adjusting for confounding factors, the risk was higher for tamoxifen users (p = 0.0012), treatment for more than 3 years (all p < 0.03) and pelvic radiotherapy (p = 0.012). Women who had endometrial cancer and had received tamoxifen had more advanced disease and poorer prognosis than those with endometrial cancer who had not received this treatment. Our results suggest a causal role of tamoxifen in endometrial cancer, particularly when used as currently proposed for breast cancer prevention. Pelvic radiotherapy may be an additional iatrogenic factor for women with breast cancer. Endometrial cancers diagnosed in women treated with tamoxifen have poorer prognosis. Women who receive tamoxifen for breast cancer should be offered gynaecological surveillance during and after treatment. A long-term evaluation of the risk-benefit ratio of tamoxifen as a preventive treatment for breast cancer is clearly warranted.

It has been reported that hypertonic saline provides protection against the renal toxicity of cisplatin (CDDP). We therefore evaluated its influence on the plasma and urinary pharmacokinetics of ultrafilterable platinum and kidney function as estimated by creatinine, inulin and PAH clearance. We undertook a randomized trial including two groups of ten patients receiving 100 mg/m2 CDDP in isotonic (group 1) or hypertonic saline (group 2) by a 20-min infusion. The hydration consisted of dextrose in group 1 and isotonic saline in group 2. Maximal concentration (Cmax), protein binding and cumulative urinary excretion were significantly higher in the dextrose group. Urinary flow decreased in this group but not in the other one. Inulin clearance was higher in the dextrose group than in the saline group and P-aminohippuric acid (PAH) clearance was not significantly different in these groups of patients. Hyponatremia was observed in the dextrose group. These results suggest that hypertonic saline infusion and saline hydration may enhance the diffusion of CDDP into tissues, lowering Cmax and renal excretion of platinum. The reduction of protein binding may indicate a diminution of aquation of CDDP in plasma. Our results suggest that the infusion of CDDP in hypertonic saline with salt hydration could exert a protective effect on the kidney. Moreover, there is a lessening of the risk of cellular hyperhydration. However, the better influence of dextrose hydration on glomerular filtration leads us to recommend a combination of the two methods of hydration for better tolerance and efficacy.

It has been reported that furosemide can prevent platinum nephrotoxicity by dilution of the toxic drug in the tubule or by another unknown mechanism. To evaluate its influence on ultrafilterable platinum pharmacokinetics, we undertook a randomized prospective trial of cis-diamminedichloroplatinum (CDDP) (80 mg/m2 by a 20-min infusion) administered to 20 patients with hydration-induced diuresis. Ten patients received 20 mg/m2 furosemide 1 h before CDDP administration, and 10 patients received no diuretic drug. Plasma and urinary pharmacokinetics of platinum and creatinine were compared in both groups of patients. Plasma total and ultrafilterable platinum was always higher in the furosemide group. However, protein binding, urinary concentrations, cumulative urinary excretion, renal clearance and creatinine clearance/renal clearance ratio (fractional clearance) were not statistically different. Moreover, the fractional clearance was successively lower, equal and higher than one in both groups. These results suggest that: (1) furosemide probably causes water depletion leading to a rise in plasma concentrations; (2) its protection by a pharmacokinetic interaction is doubtful, since all other parameters (especially urinary parameters) are not significantly modified; (3) renal clearance and fractional clearance suggest a bidirectional transport of platinum in the tubule not influenced by the diuretic drug.