1. Executive function in the classroom: Cognitive flexibility supports reading fluency for typical readers and teacher-identified low-achieving readers
- Author
-
Kelly B. Cartwright, Timothy R. Marshall, Joan B. Payne, and Cathy M. Huemer
- Subjects
Male ,030506 rehabilitation ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Automaticity ,Executive Function ,03 medical and health sciences ,Nonverbal communication ,Fluency ,Cognition ,Phonetics ,Reading (process) ,Developmental and Educational Psychology ,Humans ,Attention ,0501 psychology and cognitive sciences ,Child ,media_common ,Academic Success ,05 social sciences ,Cognitive flexibility ,Flexibility (personality) ,Clinical Psychology ,Reading ,Reading comprehension ,Case-Control Studies ,Female ,Comprehension ,0305 other medical science ,Psychology ,Neurocognitive ,050104 developmental & child psychology ,Cognitive psychology - Abstract
Background Dominant explanations of reading fluency indicate automatic phonological decoding frees mental resources for processing meaning. However, decoding automaticity does not guarantee attention to meaning. Recent neurocognitive work suggests executive functioning (EF) may contribute to fluency beyond decoding automaticity. Aims Two studies examined contributions of an understudied EF, cognitive flexibility, to fluent reading and tested a teacher-administered EF intervention to improve fluency in teacher-identified low-achieving (LA) readers. Methods and procedures Study 1 assessed word reading fluency, automatic decoding, reading comprehension, verbal and nonverbal ability, and reading-specific and domain-general cognitive flexibility in 50 1st and 2nd grade typically-developing (TD) readers. Study 2 compared TD and LA readers’ cognitive flexibility and examined effectiveness of cognitive flexibility intervention for improving fluency in 33 LA 2nd and 3rd graders. Outcomes and results Reading-specific flexibility contributed to fluency beyond automatic decoding and all other control variables in TD readers who had significantly higher cognitive flexibility than LA readers. Teacher-administered EF intervention improved reading fluency for LA readers. Conclusions and implications These findings expand understanding of the neurocognitive basis of reading fluency and add to the growing body of evidence that EF underlies learning differences and serves as a useful target of intervention for LA students.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF