Search

Objective: Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) have become a new standard of care for the maintenance treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combining stereotactic body radiotherapy with PARPi continuation as a strategy to treat ovarian cancer oligoprogression on PARPi. Methods: This is a multicenter retrospective study including ovarian cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy and PARPi continuation for oligoprogression under PARPi maintenance therapy between June 2012 and May 2023 in three Italian centers. PARPi treatment was continued until further disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was the next-line systemic therapy-free interval. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess local control, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate potential clinical outcomes predictors. Results: 46 patients were included, with a total of 89 lesions treated over 63 radiotherapy treatments. Lymph nodes were the most frequently treated lesions (80, 89.9%), followed by visceral lesions (8, 9%) and one case with a bone lesion (1.1%). Median follow-up was 25.9 months (range 2.8-122). The median next-line systemic therapy-free interval was 12.4 months (95% CI 8.3 to 19.5). A number of prior chemotherapy lines greater than five was significantly associated with a reduced next-line systemic therapy-free interval (HR 3.21, 95% CI 1.11 to 9.32, p=0.032). At the time of analysis, 32 (69.6%) patients started a new systemic therapy regimen, while 14 (30.4%) remained on the PARPi regimen. The 2-year progression-free survival, local failure-free survival, and overall survival rates were 10.7%, 78.1%, and 76.5%, respectively. Four patients (8.7%) experienced acute toxicity with G1 gastrointestinal events. Conclusion: Stereotactic body radiotherapy combined with PARPi continuation may be

Background: High-level evidence on hypofractionated proton therapy (PT) for localized and locally advanced prostate cancer (PCa) patients is currently missing. The aim of this study is to provide a systematic literature review to compare the toxicity and effectiveness of curative radiotherapy with photon therapy (XRT) or PT in PCa. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched up to April 2022. Men with a diagnosis of PCa who underwent curative hypofractionated RT treatment (PT or XRT) were included. Risk of grade (G) ≥ 2 acute and late genitourinary (GU) OR gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity were the primary outcomes of interest. Secondary outcomes were five-year biochemical relapse-free survival (b-RFS), clinical relapse-free, distant metastasis-free, and prostate cancer-specific survival. Heterogeneity between study-specific estimates was assessed using Chi-square statistics and measured with the I2 index (heterogeneity measure across studies). Results: A total of 230 studies matched inclusion criteria and, due to overlapped populations, 160 were included in the present analysis. Significant lower rates of G ≥ 2 acute GI incidence (2 % vs 7 %) and improved 5-year biochemical relapse-free survival (95 % vs 91 %) were observed in the PT arm compared to XRT. PT benefits in 5-year biochemical relapse-free survival were maintained for the moderate hypofractionated arm (p-value 0.0122) and among patients in intermediate and low-risk classes (p-values < 0.0001 and 0.0368, respectively). No statistically relevant differences were found for the other considered outcomes. Conclusion: The present study supports that PT is safe and effective for localized PCa treatment, however, more data from RCTs are needed to draw solid evidence in this setting and further effort must be made to identify the patient subgroups that could benefit the most from PT.

Purpose: To report the results involving post-operative interventional radiotherapy (POIRT) in a homogenous cohort of patients affected by keloid and treated at a single institution with the same fractionation schedule. Patients and Methods: Inclusion criteria were: surgery with a histopathological diagnosis of keloid, subsequent high-dose rate interventional radiotherapy (HDR-IRT)—12 Gy in 4 fractions (3 Gy/fr) twice a day—and follow-up period ≥ 24 months. Results: One-hundred and two patients and a total of 135 keloids were eligible for the analyses. Median follow-up was 64 [IQR: 25–103] months. Thirty-six (26.7%) recurrences were observed, 12-months and 36-months cumulative incidence of recurrence were 20.7% (95% CI 12.2–28.5) and 23.8% (95% CI 14.9–31.7) respectively. History of spontaneous keloids (HR = 7.00, 95% CI 2.79–17.6, p < 0.001), spontaneous cheloid as keloid cause (HR = 6.97, 95% CI 2.05–23.7, p = 0.002) and sternal (HR = 10.6, 95% CI 3.08–36.8, p < 0.001), ear (HR = 6.03, 95% CI 1.71–21.3, p = 0.005) or limb (HR = 18.8, 95% CI 5.14–68.7, p < 0.001) keloid sites were significantly associated to a higher risk of recurrence. Conclusions: The findings support the use of surgery and POIRT as an effective strategy for controlling keloid relapses. Further studies should focus on determining the optimal Biologically Effective Dose and on establishing a scoring system for patient selection.

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the toxicity, local control, overall and disease-free survival of elderly breast cancer (BC) patients treated with adjuvant once-weekly ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) either with intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) or 3D conformal RT (3DCRT). Methods: From July 2011 to July 2018, BC patients receiving 5.7 Gy once a week for 5 weeks to the whole breast after breast-conserving surgery were considered for the study. Inclusion criteria were: T1–T3 invasive BC, no or limited axillary involvement, age ≥ 65 years or women with commuting difficulties or disabling diseases. Results: A total of 271 patients were included in the study. Median age was 76 (46–86) years. Most of BC were T1 (77%), while the remaining were T2 (22.2%) and T3 (0.4%). Axillary status was negative in 68.3% of the patients. The only severe acute toxicity (G3) at the end of RT was erythema (0.4%), registered in the 3DCRT group; no G3 edema or epitheliolysis was recorded. With 18 months of median follow-up, severe early–late toxicity (G3) was reported in terms of fibrosis and breast retraction, both with an incidence of 1.4%, mostly in the 3DCRT group. Oncological outcomes at a median follow-up of 2.9 years reported 249/271 (91.9%) patients alive and free from any event and 5 (1.8%) isolated locoregional recurrences. At 3 years, disease-free survival and overall survival were 94.9% and 97.8%, respectively. Breast volume > 500 cm3 was reported as predictive for moderate–severe (≥ G2) acute toxicity. Conclusions: Weekly ultra-hypofractionated whole breast RT seems feasible and effective. Toxicity was mild, local control was acceptable, and overall survival was 97.8% at 3 years. Rates of severe toxicity were reduced with the IMRT technique.

Aim: To evaluate outcome of intraoperative electron boost (IOERT) and hypofractionated whole breast irradiation (HWBI) for breast cancer (BC) in young women. Methods and Materials: Women aged ≤ 48 with pT1-2 N0-1 BC received 12 Gy IOERT boost during conservative surgery followed by 3-dimensional conformal HWBI in 13 fractions (2.85 Gy/die). Local relapses (LR) and survival (disease-free, DFS; specific, BCSS; overall, OS) were analyzed. Results: 481 consecutive BC patients, mostly node negative, with median age of 42 were treated between 2004 and 2014. Median tumor size was 1.48 cm and median IOERT collimator was 4 cm. After 25-day mean interval, HWBI was delivered. At a median follow-up of 9.6 years, there were 23 LRs (4.8 %, 9 of which were in the boost region). Ten-year LR cumulative incidence was 4.1 % (95 %CI, 2.5–6.3). Over time, local control rate decreased for Luminal A and HER2 positive with negative hormonal receptors, while remained steady for triple negative. At multivariate analysis, LR predictors included age < 40, extensive intraductal component and the use of 4-cm IOERT collimator size. Ten-year survival outcomes were as follows: DFS 80.0 % (95 % CI, 75.8–83.5), BCSS 97.5 % (95 % CI, 95.5–98.6 %), OS 96.5 % (95 % CI, 94.3–97.9). Luminal B HER2 negative had the worse survival outcomes. Perioperative complications were uncommon (16.4 %), acute toxicity was mild (<2% Grade 3), but moderate/severe fibrosis was described in 40.8 % of the cases. Cosmesis was scored as excellent/good in 86 % of the cases. Conclusions: ELIOT boost and HWBI achieved an excellent local control at the cost of tumor bed fibrosis. IOERT boost dose lower than 12 Gy is advisable.

Purpose: To evaluate oncological outcomes and late toxicities in a retrospective series of patients with locally-extended anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC), treated with curative Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and chemotherapy. Methods: ASCC patients who underwent chemo-radiotherapy with IMRT from 2010 to 2020 were included. Oncological outcomes were assessed in terms of overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), colostomy-free survival (CFS) and event-free survival (EFS). Late toxicity was detected according to CTCAE v.5.0 and RTOG late radiation morbidity scoring system. Results: Ninety-five patients were included. Most patients (83%) received chemotherapy with oral Fluoropyrimidine plus Cisplatin. The median follow-up was 5.5 years. The OS was 85.2%, 82.1% and 79.3% at 3, 5 and 8 years, respectively. The DFS was 73.1%, 70%, and 65.3% at 3, 5 and 8 years, respectively; 3, 5 and 8 years CFS was 86.2%, 84.3% and 84.3%, respectively. The EFS was 71%, 67.9% and 63.1%, at 3, 5 and 8 years, respectively. On univariable analysis, a statistically significant lower OS was found for patients with T3-T4 stage (HR = 4.58, p = 0.005) and overall treatment time (OTT) ≥ 47 days (HR = 3.37, p = 0.038). A statistically significant lower DFS was reported for patients with T3-T4 stage (HR = 2.72, p = 0.008) and Serum Squamous Cell Carcinoma Antigen (SCC) value post-RT > 1.5 (HR = 2.90, p = 0.038.). Ten severe late toxicity (≥ G3) events were reported in 8 patients (8.6%). Conclusions: Our data confirm IMRT concomitant with a Cisplatin-based chemotherapy as an effective treatment of ASCC, ensuring acceptable long-term toxicities and good oncological outcomes.

Aims: To report toxicity of a hypofractionated scheme of whole-breast (WB) intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to the tumor bed (TB) using Tomotherapy® with Direct modality. Methods: Patients with early breast cancer, undergoing radiotherapy (RT) in 15 daily fractions to WB (prescription dose 40.05 Gy) and SIB to the TB (48 Gy), between 2013 and 2017, was analyzed. Primary endpoint was acute and intermediate toxicity assessed at the end and within 6 months from RT, according to Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) scale. Secondary endpoints included early chronic toxicity at 12-months follow-up, using the Late Effects Normal Tissue Task Subjective, Objective, Management, and Analytic (LENT-SOMA) scale, and cosmesis using Harvard criteria. Results: The study population was of 287 patients. Acute and intermediate toxicity was collected among 183 patients with data available at the end of RT and within 6 months, 85 (46%) experienced G2 toxicity and 84 (46%) G1 toxicity, while 14 (8%) did not report toxicity at any time. A significant reduction of any grade toxicity was observed between the two time points, with the majority of patients reporting no clinically relevant toxicity at 6 months. At univariate analysis, age < 40 years, breast volume > 1000 cm3 and Dmax ≤ 115% of prescription dose were predictive factors of clinically relevant acute toxicity (G ≥ 2) at any time. At multivariable analysis, only age and breast volume were confirmed as predictive factors, with Relative Risks (95% Confidence Intervals): 2.02 (1.13–3.63) and 1.84 (1.26–2.67), respectively. At 12-month follow-up, 113 patients had complete information on any toxicity with 53% of toxicity G < 2, while cosmetic evaluation, available for 102 patients, reported a good–excellent result for 86% of patients. Conclusions: Hypofractionated WB IMRT with a SIB to the TB, delivered with TomoDirect modality, is safe and well-tolerated. Most patients reporte

Background: Postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) with TomoHelicalTM (TH) or TomoDirectTM (TD) allows a uniform target coverage. In this study, we compare treatment plans using TD and TH in the setting of hypofractionated PMRT and immediate breast reconstruction. Material and methods: The TD-treatment plans of breast cancer patients treated between May 2016 and August 2019 were retrospectively selected. All the TD plans were re-planned on TH with the same prescription dose (40.05 Gy/15 fractions) and according to our dose/volume constraints. Data about the 2 treatment plans were compared with a focus on PTV coverage and all the organs at risk (OARs) constraints. Results: Fifty patients for a total number of 100 treatment plans (50 with TD and 50 re-planned with TH) were analyzed. All the median value in the TD PTV CHEST WALL plans fulfilled the predefined planning objectives, even though TH emerged as best for target coverage with statistically significant difference for V90%. TD provided the lowest V95% for the PTV SVC, but the median value was near to the recommended value of 90% (89.8 % vs 98.6% for TD and TH, respectively). Overall, TD reached the best OARs sparing. The main statistically significant differences with TH were for contralateral breast, ipsilateral and contralateral lung. All the other dose values for TH were higher than TD, but they fulfilled the recommended/acceptable predefined planning objectives. Conclusions: In the setting of PMRT, TD compared to TH reached an acceptable target volume coverage, with an optimal sparing of OARs.

Aim: The primary aim of this study is to provide preliminary indications for safe constraints of rectum and bladder in patients re-irradiated with stereotactic body RT (SBRT). Methods: Data from patients treated for prostate cancer (PCa) and intraprostatic relapse, from 1998 to 2016, were retrospectively collected. First RT course was delivered with 3D conformal RT techniques, SBRT or volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). All patients underwent re-irradiation with SBRT with heavy hypofractionated schedules. Cumulative dose-volume values to organs at risk (OARs) were computed and possible correlation with developed toxicities was investigated. Results: Twenty-six patients were included. Median age at re-irradiation was 75 years, mean interval between the two RT courses was 5.6 years and the median follow-up was 47.7 months (13.4–114.3 months). After re-irradiation, acute and late G ≥ 2 GU toxicity events were reported in 3 (12%) and 10 (38%) patients, respectively, while late G ≥ 2 GI events were reported in 4 (15%) patients. No acute G ≥ 2 GI side effects were registered. Patients receiving an equivalent uniform dose of the two RT treatments < 131 Gy appeared to be at higher risk of progression (4-yr b-PFS: 19% vs 33%, p = 0.145). Cumulative re-irradiation constraints that appear to be safe are D30% < 57.9 Gy for bladder and D30% < 66.0 Gy, D60% < 38.0 Gy and V122.1 Gy < 5% for rectum. Conclusion: Preliminary re-irradiation constraints for bladder and rectum have been reported. Our preliminary investigation may serve to clear some grey areas of PCa re-irradiation.

Aim: To evaluate reconstruction failure (RF) rate in patients receiving implant-based immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) and hypofractionated (HF) postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT). Materials and methods: Stage II–III breast cancer patients, treated with HF-PMRT using intensity modulated radiotherapy were stratified in two groups according to IBR: single-stage direct-to-implant (DTI-group) and two-stage expander and implant (TE/I-group). Irradiated patients were matched with non-irradiated ones who underwent the same IBR during the same period. Prescription dose was 40.05 Gy/15 fractions to chest wall and infra/supraclavicular nodal region. Primary endpoint was RF defined as the need of major revisional surgery (MaRS) for implant removal or conversion to autologous reconstruction. Secondary endpoint was the rate of minor revisional surgeries (MiRS) including implant repositioning or substitution with another implant. Results: One hundred and seven irradiated patients (62 in TE/I-group, 45 in DTI-group) were matched with 107 non-irradiated subjects. Median follow-up was 4.2 years (0.1–6.1) In the TE/I setting, MaRS was performed in 8/62 irradiated patients (12.9%) of the irradiated TE/I group compared to 1/62 (1.6%) non-irradiated subjects (p = 0.015). In the DTI setting, MaRs occurred in 3/45 irradiated patients (6.7%) compared to 1/45 non-irradiated ones (2.2%) (p = 0.35). Overall MaRS rate was 10.3% in the irradiated group. MiRS was performed in 35.6% and 31.1% of the irradiated and non-irradiated DTI-groups (p = 0.65), respectively, and in 12.9% and 8.1% of the irradiated and non-irradiated TE/I groups (p = 0.38), respectively. Conclusions: Compared to the non-irradiated counterparts, the TE/I group showed higher rate of RF, while no statistically significant difference was observed for the DTI group. The use of hypofractionation and IMRT to implant-based IBR did not seem to increase the risk of RF which appeared to be in line with the literature.

In the last 20 years coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) gained a pivotal role in the evaluation of patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) as finally recognized by the ESC guidelines on stable CAD. Technological advances have progressively improved the temporal resolution of CT scanners, contemporary reducing acquisition time, radiation dose and contrast volume needed for the whole heart volume acquisition, further expanding the role of cardiac CT beyond coronary anatomy evaluation. Aim of the present review is to discuss use and benefit of cardiac CT for the planning and preparation of VT ablation.