Search

COVID-19 surges led to significant challenges in ensuring critical care capacity. In response, some centers leveraged neurocritical care (NCC) capacity as part of the surge response, with neurointensivists providing general critical care for patients with COVID-19 without neurologic illness. The relative outcomes of NCC critical care management of patients with COVID-19 remain unclear and may help guide further surge planning and provide broader insights into general critical care provided in NCC units.We performed an observational cohort study of all patients requiring critical care for COVID-19 across four hospitals within the Emory Healthcare system during the first three surges. Patients were categorized on the basis of admission to intensive care units (ICUs) staffed by general intensivists or neurointensivists. Patients with primary neurological diagnoses were excluded. Baseline demographics, clinical complications, and outcomes were compared between groups using univariable and propensity score matching statistics.A total of 1141 patients with a primary diagnosis of COVID-19 required ICU admission. ICUs were staffed by general intensivists (n = 1071) or neurointensivists (n = 70). Baseline demographics and presentation characteristics were similar between groups, except for patients admitted to neurointensivist-staffed ICUs being younger (59 vs. 65, p = 0.027) and having a higher PaOCOVID-19 surges precipitated a natural experiment in which neurology-trained neurointensivists provided critical care in a comparable context to general intensivists treating the same disease. Neurology-trained neurointensivists delivered comparable outcomes to those of general ICUs during COVID-19 surges. These results further support the role of NCC in meeting general critical care needs of neurocritically ill patients and as a viable surge resource in general critical care.

OBJECTIVE Cerebral vasospasm and delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) contribute to poor outcome following subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). With the paucity of effective treatments, the authors describe their experience with intrathecal (IT) nicardipine for this indication. METHODS Patients admitted to the Emory University Hospital neuroscience ICU between 2012 and 2017 with nontraumatic SAH, either aneurysmal or idiopathic, were included in the analysis. Using a propensity-score model, this patient cohort was compared to patients in the Subarachnoid Hemorrhage International Trialists (SAHIT) repository who did not receive IT nicardipine. The primary outcome was DCI. Secondary outcomes were long-term functional outcome and adverse events. RESULTS The analysis included 1351 patients, 422 of whom were diagnosed with cerebral vasospasm and treated with IT nicardipine. When compared with patients with no vasospasm (n = 859), the treated group was significantly younger (mean age 51.1 ± 12.4 years vs 56.7 ± 14.1 years, p < 0.001), had a higher World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies score and modified Fisher grade, and were more likely to undergo clipping of the ruptured aneurysm as compared to endovascular treatment (30.3% vs 11.3%, p < 0.001). Treatment with IT nicardipine decreased the daily mean transcranial Doppler velocities in 77.3% of the treated patients. When compared to patients not receiving IT nicardipine, treatment was not associated with an increased rate of bacterial ventriculitis (3.1% vs 2.7%, p > 0.1), yet higher rates of ventriculoperitoneal shunting were noted (19.9% vs 8.8%, p < 0.01). In a propensity score comparison to the SAHIT database, the odds ratio (OR) to develop DCI with IT nicardipine treatment was 0.61 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44–0.84), and the OR to have a favorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score ≤ 2) was 2.17 (95% CI 1.61–2.91). CONCLUSIONS IT nicardipine was associated with improved outcome and reduced DCI compared with propensity-matched controls. There was an increased need for permanent CSF diversion but no other safety issues. These data should be considered when selecting medications and treatments to study in future randomized controlled clinical trials for SAH.

Background and PurposeCerebral vasospasm and delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) contribute to poor outcome following subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). With the paucity of effective treatments, we describe our experience with intrathecal (IT) nicardipine for this indication.MethodsPatients admitted to Emory University Hospital Neuroscience ICU between 2012-2017 with non-traumatic SAH, either aneurysmal or idiopathic, were included in the analysis. This patient cohort was compared using a propensity-score model to patients in the SAH international trialist (SAHIT) repository who did not receive intrathecal nicardipine. The primary outcome was DCI. Secondary outcomes were long-term functional outcome and adverse events.ResultsThe analysis included 1,351 patients, 422 of whom were diagnosed with cerebral vasospasm and treated with IT nicardipine. When compared with patients with no vasospasm (n=859) the treated group was younger (51.1±12.4 vs. 56.7±14.1, p0.1) yet higher rates of VP shunting were noted (19.9% vs. 8.8%, pConclusionsIT nicardipine was associated with improved outcome and reduced DCI compared with propensity matched controls. There was an increased need for permanent CSF diversion but no other safety issues. This data should be considered when selecting medications and treatments to study in future randomized controlled clinical trial for SAH.

Introduction: Cerebral vasospasm leading to delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) is one of the most significant factors impacting functional outcome in patients diagnosed with non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Effective treatment in this setting is lacking. We now report a single center retrospective cohort experience with intrathecal (IT) Nicardipine for this indication. Methods: All patients discharged between 2013-2017 diagnosed with non-traumatic SAH, either aneurysmal or idiopathic, were included in the analysis. Demographics, risk factors, clinical courses, radiological DCI, and functional outcomes were analyzed. Results: 1,085 patients were admitted with aneurysmal (n=796) or idiopathic (n=289) SAH. The mean age was 54.5±14.1 and 67.7% were women. Low grade hemorrhage (WFNS 1) was found in 42.4%, medium (WFNS 2-3) in 26.9%, and high grade (WFNS 4-5) in 30.7%. Cerebral vasospasm was diagnosed in 36.6% of the patients, and 85.4% of those received IT Nicardipine (n=339). Only 8.4% of all patients required angiography to treat vasospasm. TCD data was available for 159 patients who received IT Nicardipine. Treatment reduced mean velocities in all arteries within one day by 15.4% on average (p Conclusions: In a retrospective analysis, off-label IT Nicardipine is a safe and potentially effective treatment for cerebral vasospasm and prevention of the subsequent cerebral ischemia. Being the largest of its kind, this cohort could serve as a baseline for future clinical trial designs assessing IT Nicardipine safety and efficacy in a prospective, controlled fashion.

Additional file 2: Table S2. Patient outcomes. No statistically significant difference was noted between the two treatment groups. Ten patients were lost to long-term (90 day) follow up. mRS – Modified Rankin Scale.

Additional file 1: Table S1. ICU complications rate. No statistically significant difference was noted between the two treatment groups.

Cerebrovascular diseases attributed to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are uncommon but can result in devastating outcomes. Pediatric acute ischemic strokes are themselves rare and with very few large vessel occlusion related acute ischemic strokes attributed to COVID-19 described in the literature as of date. COVID-19 pandemic has contributed to acute stroke care delays across the world and with pediatric endovascular therapy still in its infancy, it poses a great challenge in facilitating good outcomes in children presenting with acute ischemic strokes in the setting of COVID-19. We present a pediatric patient who underwent endovascular therapy for an internal carotid artery occlusion related acute ischemic stroke in the setting of active COVID-19 and had an excellent outcome thanks to a streamlined stroke pathway involving the vascular neurology, neuro-interventional, neurocritical care, and anesthesiology teams.