Search

Purpose: This study aimed to present real-life data on the use, effectiveness, and safety of administering Ceftolozane/Tazobactam (C/T) through elastomeric pumps (EP) in the outpatient setting. Methods: This case series study was conducted from January 2022 to July 2023 in a large University Hospital in Rome, Italy. Patients receiving continuous infusion of C/T via EP were included up to a follow-up period of 90 days after the end of antibiotic therapy. The primary endpoint was the infection's clinical cure rate. Secondary endpoints were adverse events attributable to continuous home infusion of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam via elastomeric pumps. Results: Seven patients received C/T continuously infused via EP and were included in the final analysis. Three patients suffered from prosthetic joint infection (n = 3/7; 43%), two patients from osteomyelitis (n = 2/7; 29%), one patient from otomastoiditis (n = 1/7; 15%) and one from pneumonia (n = 1/7; 15%). All infection were sustained by P. aeruginosa. Five strains had MDR-type susceptibility profiles (n = 5/7; 71%) and two of these were DTR (n = 2/7; 29%). The infection cure rate reached 86% (n = 6/7). Two patients reported a complication related to the vascular catheter for drug infusion (n = 2/7; 29%). Conclusions: Continuous infusion of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam by elastomeric pumps has been shown to be safe and effective in practice representing a viable option of intravenous treatment in outpatient setting for infection sustained by P. aeruginosa especially for multidrug-resistant strains. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ceftolozane/tazobactam is approved for the treatment of patients from birth to

Purpose: The current study evaluated the in vitro activities of ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T), imipenem/relebactam (IMI/REL), and comparators against recent (2017–2021) clinical isolates of gram-negative bacilli from two countries in southern Europe. Methods: Nine clinical laboratories (two in Greece; seven in Italy) each collected up to 250 consecutive gram-negative isolates per year from lower respiratory tract, intraabdominal, urinary tract, and bloodstream infection samples. MICs were determined by the CLSI broth microdilution method and interpreted using 2022 EUCAST breakpoints. β-lactamase genes were identified in select β-lactam-nonsusceptible isolate subsets. Results: C/T inhibited the growth of 85–87% of Enterobacterales and 94–96% of ESBL-positive non-CRE NME (non-Morganellaceae Enterobacterales) isolates from both countries. IMI/REL inhibited 95–98% of NME, 100% of ESBL-positive non-CRE NME, and 98–99% of KPC-positive NME isolates from both countries. Country-specific differences in percent susceptible values for C/T, IMI/REL, meropenem, piperacillin/tazobactam, levofloxacin, and amikacin were more pronounced for Pseudomonas aeruginosa than Enterobacterales. C/T and IMI/REL both inhibited 84% of P. aeruginosa isolates from Greece and 91–92% of isolates from Italy. MBL rates were estimated as 4% of Enterobacterales and 10% of P. aeruginosa isolates from Greece compared to 1% of Enterobacterales and 3% of P. aeruginosa isolates from Italy. KPC rates among Enterobacterales isolates were similar in both countries (7–8%). OXA-48-like enzymes were only identified in Enterobacterales isolates from Italy (1%) while GES carbapenemase genes were only identified in P. aeruginosa isolates from Italy (2%). Conclusion: We conclude that C/T and IMI/REL may provide viable treatment options for many patients from Greece and Italy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We evaluated the activities of aztreonam/avibactam and recently approved β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (BLICs) to compare the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from intensive care unit (ICU) and non-ICU patients. Clinical isolates (1/patient) were consecutively collected from 72 United States medical centres in 2020–2022 and susceptibility tested by broth microdilution. The results for 5421 isolates from ICU patients were analysed and compared to those for 20,649 isolates from non-ICU patients. Isolates from ventilator-associated pneumonia patients were analysed separately. Aztreonam/avibactam inhibited 100.0%/>99.9% Enterobacterales and 100.0%/98.3% of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) from ICU/non-ICU patients at ≤8 mg/L, respectively. The CRE susceptibility rates were 88.5%/82.9% for ceftazidime/avibactam, 82.1%/81.2% for meropenem/vaborbactam, and 78.2%/72.6% for imipenem/relebactam among ICU/non-ICU isolates. Among the P. aeruginosa isolates from ICU/non-ICU patients, the susceptibility rates were 96.3%/97.6% for ceftazidime/avibactam, 97.2/98.4% for ceftolozane/tazobactam, 97.1%/98.0% for imipenem/relebactam, 77.8%/84.6% for piperacillin/tazobactam, and 76.9%/85.8% for meropenem; aztreonam/avibactam inhibited 78.0%/81.9% of P. aeruginosa at ≤8 mg/L. In summary, lower susceptibility rates were observed among ICU than non-ICU isolates. Aztreonam/avibactam exhibited potent in vitro activity and broad-spectrum activity against Enterobacterales from ICU and non-ICU patients, including CRE and isolates non-susceptible to newer BLICs. Against P. aeruginosa, aztreonam/avibactam showed a spectrum of activity comparable to that of piperacillin/tazobactam, meropenem, and ceftazidime. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Gram-negative bacteria have been one of the most studied classes in the field of microbiology, especially in the context of globally alarming antimicrobial resistance levels to these pathogens over the course of the past decades. With high numbers of these microorganisms being described as multidrug-resistant (MDR), or even extended-drug-resistant (XDR) bacteria, specialists in the field have been struggling to keep up with higher prevalence of difficult-to-treat infections caused by such superbugs. The FDA approval of novel antimicrobials, such as cefiderocol (FDC), ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T), ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA), imipenem/relebactam (IMR), sulbactam/durlobactam (SUL-DUR) and phase 3 clinical trials' results of aztreonam/avibactam (ATM-AVI) has proven that, while all these substances provide encouraging efficacy rates, antibiotic resistance keeps up with the pace of drug development. Microorganisms have developed more extensive mechanisms of resistance in order to target the threat posed by these novel antimicrobials, thus equiring researchers to be on a constant lookout for other potential drug candidates and molecule development. However, these strategies require a proper understanding of bacterial resistance mechanisms to gain a comprehensive outlook on the issue. The present review aims to highlight these six antibiotic agents, which have brought hope to clinicians during the past decade, discussing general properties of these substances, as well as mechanisms and patterns of resistance, while also providing a short overview on further directions in the field. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The potential for promotion of intestinal colonization with healthcare-associated pathogens by new antibiotics used to treat infections due to multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli is unclear. Methods: Mice treated for 3 days with daily subcutaneous phosphate-buffered saline (control), ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftaroline, and meropenem/vaborbactam were challenged with 10,000 colony-forming units (CFU) of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) resistant to each of the antibioics or carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae 1 day after the final treatment dose. The concentrations of VRE or K. pneumoniae in stool were measured on days 1, 3, 6, and 15 after challenge. Results: Control mice had transient low levels of VRE or K. pneumoniae (8 log10 CFU/g of stool on day 1 after challenge) that persisted at >4 log10 CFU/g of stool through day 15 (P8 log10 CFU/g of stool) (P5 log10 CFU/g of stool), and ceftazidime/avibactam did not promote colonization (P>0.05). Conclusions: Our results suggest that several beta-lactam antibiotics recently developed for treatment of infections with resistant Gram-negative bacilli have the potential to promote colonization by healthcare-associated pathogens. Additional studies are needed to examine the impact of these agents in patients.

Abstract Background Resistant bacterial infections, particularly those caused by gram-negative pathogens, are associated with high mortality and economic burdens. Ceftolozane/tazobactam demonstrated efficacy comparable to meropenem in patients with ventilated hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia in the ASPECT-NP study. One cost-effectiveness analysis in the United States revealed that ceftolozane/tazobactam was cost effective, but no Japanese studies have been conducted. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of ceftolozane/tazobactam compared to meropenem for patients with ventilated hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia from a health care payer perspective. Methods A hybrid decision-tree Markov decision-analytic model with a 5-year time horizon were developed to estimate costs and quality-adjusted life-years and to calculate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio associated with ceftolozane/tazobactam and meropenem in the treatment of patients with ventilated hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia. Clinical outcomes were based on the ASPECT-NP study, costs were based on the national fee schedule of 2022, and utilities were based on published data. One-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were also conducted to assess the robustness of our modeled estimates. Results According to our base-case analysis, compared with meropenem, ceftolozane/tazobactam increased the total costs by 424,731.22 yen (£2,626.96) and increased the quality-adjusted life-years by 0.17, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 2,548,738 yen (£15,763.94) per quality-adjusted life-year gained for ceftolozane/tazobactam compared with meropenem. One-way sensitivity analysis showed that although the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio remained below 5,000,000 yen (£30,925) for most of the parameters, the incremental net monetary benefit may have been less than 0 depending on the treatment efficacy outcome, especially the cure rate and mortality rate for MEPM and mortality rate for CTZ/TAZ. 53.4% of the PSA simulations demonstrated that CTZ/TAZ was more cost-effective than MEPM was. Conclusion Although incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was below ￥5,000,000 in base-case analysis, whether ceftolozane/tazobactam is a cost-effective alternative to meropenem for ventilated hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia in Japan remains uncertain. Future research should examine the unobserved heterogeneity across patient subgroups and decision-making settings, to characterise decision uncertainty and its consequences so as to assess whether additional research is required.

Bacterial resistance surveillance is one of the main outputs of microbiological laboratories and its results are important part of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS). In this study, the susceptibility of specific bacteria to selected antimicrobial agents was tested. The susceptibility of 90 unique isolates of pathogens of critical priority obtained from clinically valid samples of ICU patients in 2017–2021 was tested. 50% of these fulfilled difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) criteria and 50% were susceptible to all antibiotics included in the definition. 10 Enterobacterales strains met DTR criteria, and 2 (20%) were resistant to colistin (COL), 2 (20%) to cefiderocol (FCR), 7 (70%) to imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam (I/R), 3 (30%) to ceftazidime/avibactam (CAT) and 5 (50%) to fosfomycin (FOS). For Enterobacterales we also tested aztreonam/avibactam (AZA) for which there are no breakpoints yet. The highest MIC of AZA observed was 1 mg/l, MIC range in the susceptible cohort was 0.032–0.064 mg/l and in the DTR cohort (incl. class B beta-lactamase producers) it was 0.064–1 mg/l. Two (13.3%) isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (15 DTR strains) were resistant to COL, 1 (6.7%) to FCR, 13 (86.7%) to I/R, 5 (33.3%) to CAT, and 5 (33.3%) to ceftolozane/tazobactam. All isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii with DTR were susceptible to COL and FCR, and at the same time resistant to I/R and ampicillin/sulbactam. New antimicrobial agents are not 100% effective against DTR. Therefore, it is necessary to perform susceptibility testing of these antibiotics, use the data for surveillance (including local surveillance) and conform to AMS standards. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ceftolozane, a novel cephalosporin, combined with tazobactam, a known β-lactamase inhibitor, shows robust antipseudomonal activity, although it doesn't cover carbapenemases. Our review of data from 2012 to 2021 in Taiwan highlights TOL/TAZ's in-vitro performance.TOL/TAZ is most effective against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (91.3–94.4 % susceptible, with an MIC

Gram-negative bacteria have been one of the most studied classes in the field of microbiology, especially in the context of globally alarming antimicrobial resistance levels to these pathogens over the course of the past decades. With high numbers of these microorganisms being described as multidrug-resistant (MDR), or even extended-drug-resistant (XDR) bacteria, specialists in the field have been struggling to keep up with higher prevalence of difficult-to-treat infections caused by such superbugs. The FDA approval of novel antimicrobials, such as cefiderocol (FDC), ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T), ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA), imipenem/relebactam (IMR), sulbactam/durlobactam (SUL-DUR) and phase 3 clinical trials’ results of aztreonam/avibactam (ATM-AVI) has proven that, while all these substances provide encouraging efficacy rates, antibiotic resistance keeps up with the pace of drug development. Microorganisms have developed more extensive mechanisms of resistance in order to target the threat posed by these novel antimicrobials, thus equiring researchers to be on a constant lookout for other potential drug candidates and molecule development. However, these strategies require a proper understanding of bacterial resistance mechanisms to gain a comprehensive outlook on the issue. The present review aims to highlight these six antibiotic agents, which have brought hope to clinicians during the past decade, discussing general properties of these substances, as well as mechanisms and patterns of resistance, while also providing a short overview on further directions in the field.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#searchadvanced, Identifier CRD42024505832.

This study compares the clinical and microbiological efficacy of ceftolozane/tazobactam (CTLZ/TAZ) and piperacillin/tazobactam (PIPC/TAZ) for treating complicated cystitis or acute pyelonephritis. Patients who had been treated with empiric antibiotics, CTLZ/TAZ (52 cases) or PIPC/TAZ (47 cases), due to urinary tract infections (UTIs) were eligible for this study. Patients' demographic backgrounds, types of UTIs, and causative microorganisms isolated from urine or blood bacterial cultures were collected. Short-term clinical efficacy at the end of the initial empiric therapy, long-term clinical efficacy including sequential antibiotic treatments (nonrecurrence rate within 1 month after the initial empiric therapy), and microbiological efficacy were retrospectively compared in both CTLZ/TAZ and PIPC/TAZ groups. Complicated UTIs were present in most eligible patients, and no significant difference in the patients' background was observed between the two groups. Escherichia coli and Enterococcus faecalis were the most common microorganisms isolated from urine culture in both groups. The short-term clinical effective rate of CTLZ/TAZ and PIPC/TAZ was 80.8% and 87.2%, respectively. For long-term clinical efficacy, the nonrecurrence rate of UTIs was present in 95.1% and 89.7% of patients with CTLZ/TAZ and PIPC/TAZ, respectively. No significant difference was observed in the short- and long-term effects between the two groups. The microbiological efficacy of the CTLZ/TAZ and PIPC/TAZ groups was 72.7% and 86.0%, respectively. No significant difference in microbiological effects was also observed between the two groups. This study demonstrated the noninferiority of CTLZ/TAZ to PIPC/TAZ, suggesting that CTLZ/TAZ is an alternative antibiotic used as empiric therapy for UTIs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ABSTRACT: Objectives: To determine the in vitro activities of ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) and comparators against Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates cultured from hospitalised patient samples in Taiwan from 2012 to 2021 with an additional focus on the temporal and geographical prevalence of carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (CRPA). Methods: P. aeruginosa isolates (n = 3013) were collected annually by clinical laboratories in northern (two medical centres), central (three medical centres), and southern Taiwan (four medical centres) as part of the SMART global surveillance program. MICs were determined by CLSI broth microdilution and interpreted using 2022 CLSI breakpoints. Molecular β-lactamase gene identification was performed on selected non-susceptible isolate subsets in 2015 and later. Results: Overall, 520 (17.3%) CRPA isolates were identified. The prevalence of CRPA increased from 11.5%–12.3% (2012–2015) to 19.4%–22.8% (2018–2021) (P ≤ 0.0001). Medical centres in northern Taiwan reported the highest percentages of CRPA. C/T, first tested in the SMART program in 2016, was highly active against all P. aeruginosa (97% susceptible), with annual susceptibility rates ranging from 94% (2017) to 99% (2020). Against CRPA, C/T inhibited >90% of isolates each year, with the exception of 2017 (79.4% susceptible). Most CRPA isolates (83%) were molecularly characterised, and only 2.1% (9/433) carried a carbapenemase (most commonly, VIM); all nine carbapenemase-positive isolates were from northern and central Taiwan. Conclusion: The prevalence of CRPA increased significantly in Taiwan from 2012 to 2021 and warrants continued monitoring. In 2021, 97% of all P. aeruginosa and 92% of CRPA in Taiwan were C/T susceptible. Routine in vitro susceptibility testing of clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa against C/T, and other newer β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, appears prudent.

We evaluated the activities of aztreonam/avibactam and recently approved β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (BLICs) to compare the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from intensive care unit (ICU) and non-ICU patients. Clinical isolates (1/patient) were consecutively collected from 72 United States medical centres in 2020–2022 and susceptibility tested by broth microdilution. The results for 5421 isolates from ICU patients were analysed and compared to those for 20,649 isolates from non-ICU patients. Isolates from ventilator-associated pneumonia patients were analysed separately. Aztreonam/avibactam inhibited 100.0%/>99.9% Enterobacterales and 100.0%/98.3% of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) from ICU/non-ICU patients at ≤8 mg/L, respectively. The CRE susceptibility rates were 88.5%/82.9% for ceftazidime/avibactam, 82.1%/81.2% for meropenem/vaborbactam, and 78.2%/72.6% for imipenem/relebactam among ICU/non-ICU isolates. Among the P. aeruginosa isolates from ICU/non-ICU patients, the susceptibility rates were 96.3%/97.6% for ceftazidime/avibactam, 97.2/98.4% for ceftolozane/tazobactam, 97.1%/98.0% for imipenem/relebactam, 77.8%/84.6% for piperacillin/tazobactam, and 76.9%/85.8% for meropenem; aztreonam/avibactam inhibited 78.0%/81.9% of P. aeruginosa at ≤8 mg/L. In summary, lower susceptibility rates were observed among ICU than non-ICU isolates. Aztreonam/avibactam exhibited potent in vitro activity and broad-spectrum activity against Enterobacterales from ICU and non-ICU patients, including CRE and isolates non-susceptible to newer BLICs. Against P. aeruginosa, aztreonam/avibactam showed a spectrum of activity comparable to that of piperacillin/tazobactam, meropenem, and ceftazidime.

Background Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a leading cause of hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (HABP/VABP). Novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor (BL/BLI) combinations are often used for these infections; however, limited data exist to guide the dosing of BL/BLI in patients who are morbidly obese. Thus, we sought to evaluate the clinical and safety endpoints of patients who are morbidly obese (body mass index ≥35 kg/m2) and non–morbidly obese (<35 kg/m2) and receiving BL/BLI for P aeruginosa HABP/VABP. Methods This retrospective study was based on a cohort of patients hospitalized at 2 urban academic medical centers in Detroit, Michigan, from August 2014 through February 2021 with P aeruginosa HABP/VABP who were receiving BL/BLI (ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, or meropenem/vaborbactam) for ≥72 continuous hours. The primary endpoint was presumed treatment failure, defined as the presence of all-cause in-hospital mortality or the continuation of infectious symptoms. Analyses were adjusted for possible confounding with inverse probability of treatment weighting. Multivariable regression was used to identify predictors of treatment failure. Results In total, 285 patients with HABP (61.4%) and/or VABP (56.1%) were enrolled (morbidly obese, n = 95; non–morbidly obese, n = 190). The median Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score was 23 (IQR, 13–26), and 60% of patients were admitted to the intensive care unit at index culture collection. Patients who were morbidly obese demonstrated significantly greater odds of presumed treatment failure vs those who were non–morbidly obese (58.9% vs 37.9%, respectively; adjusted odds ratio, 1.675 [95% CI, 1.465–1.979]). In multivariable analysis, morbid obesity (1.06; 95% CI, 1.02–1.79), prolonged time to BL/BLI initiation (1.47; 95% CI, 1.28–2.66), renal dose–adjusted BL/BLI in the first 48 hours of therapy (1.12; 95% CI, 1.09–1.75), and continuous renal replacement therapy during BL/BLI therapy (1.35; 95% CI, 1.06–1.68) were independently associated with increased odds of presumed treatment failure. Conclusions Among hospitalized patients receiving BL/BLI for P aeruginosa HABP/VABP, those who were morbidly obese had significantly greater odds of presumed treatment failure when compared with those who were non–morbidly obese. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ABSTRACT Ceftolozane/tazobactam is approved for the treatment of patients from birth to

Infections due to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are increasingly prevalent in children and are associated with poor clinical outcomes, especially in critically ill patients. Novel beta lactam antibiotics, including ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam, and cefiderocol, have been released in recent years to face the emerging challenge of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacteria. Nonetheless, several novel agents lack pediatric indications approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicine Agency (EMA), leading to uncertain pediatric-specific treatment strategies and uncertain dosing regimens in the pediatric population. In this narrative review we have summarized the available clinical and pharmacological data, current limitations and future prospects of novel beta lactam antibiotics in the pediatric population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

(1) Background: Ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) is a novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor with excellent activity against the multidrug-resistant (MDR) P. aeruginosa. Continuous infusion (CI) dosing allows the optimization of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) properties of β-lactam antibiotics and may support patients' treatment as outpatients. (2) Methods: Adult patients receiving their entire course of C/T as a CI in the outpatient setting were retrospectively included in the study. The primary outcome evaluated was clinical resolution. The secondary outcomes evaluated were PK/PD target attainment (ƒT > 4 × MIC) and microbiologic clearance at the end of treatment. Therapeutic drug monitoring to assess C/T concentration was performed. (3) Results: Three patients were enrolled in the study and received 9 g of C/T in CI every 24 h. One patient received an additional course of antimicrobial therapy due to disease exacerbation six months after initial treatment, accounting for four evaluated treatments. The primary outcome was achieved in 3/4 treatments and the secondary outcome was achieved in 4/4 and 3/3, respectively. In all patients, free ceftolozane concentrations were >10 times higher than the EUCAST breakpoint (4 mg/L). (4) Conclusions: Elastomeric infusion of C/T delivered in CI can be an effective and convenient way to treat acute diseases caused by MDR-P. aeruginosa, avoid hospital admission, and contribute to infection control strategies. Despite the small number of enrolled patients, clinical and microbiological results support this strategy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Antimicrobial resistance has become a significant public health problem globally with multidrug resistant Gram negative (MDR-GN) bacteria being the main representatives. The emergence of these pathogens in neonatal settings threatens the well-being of the vulnerable neonatal population given the dearth of safe and effective therapeutic options. Evidence from studies mainly in adults is now available for several novel antimicrobial compounds, such as new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors (e.g., ceftazidime–avibactam, meropenem–vaborbactam, imipenem/cilastatin–relebactam), although old antibiotics such as colistin, tigecycline, and fosfomycin are also encompassed in the fight against MDR-GN infections that remain challenging. Data in the neonatal population are scarce, with few clinical trials enrolling neonates for the evaluation of the efficacy, safety, and dosing of new antibiotics, while the majority of old antibiotics are used off-label. In this article we review data about some novel and old antibiotics that are active against MDR-GN bacteria causing sepsis and are of interest to be used in the neonatal population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) is indicated for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infection (IAI), complicated urinary tract infection (UTI), and hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia caused by susceptible bacteria. As real-world data are limited, we report utilization and associated outcomes of C/T use in the outpatient setting. Methods This is a multicenter, retrospective study of patients who received C/T between May 2015 and December 2020. Demographics, infection types, C/T utilization characteristics, microbiology, and health care resource utilization were collected. Clinical success was defined as complete or partial symptom resolution at completion of C/T. Persistent infection and discontinuation of C/T were deemed nonsuccess. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors associated with clinical outcomes. Results A total of 126 patients (median age, 59 years; 59% male; median Charlson index, 5) from 33 office infusion centers were identified. Infection types included 27% bone and joint infection (BJI), 23% UTI, 18% respiratory tract infection (RTI), 16% IAI, 13% complicated skin and soft tissue infection (cSSTI), and 3% bacteremia. The median daily dose of C/T was 4.5 g, primarily administered via elastomeric pumps as intermittent infusion. The most common gram-negative pathogen was P. aeruginosa (63%), 66% of which was multidrug-resistant and 45% carbapenem-resistant. Enterobacterales was identified in 26% of isolates, of which 44% were extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producers. The overall clinical success rate of C/T was 84.7%. Nonsuccessful outcomes were due to persistent infections (9.7%) and drug discontinuations (5.6%). Conclusions C/T was successfully used in the outpatient setting to treat a variety of serious infections with a high prevalence of resistant pathogens. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: We evaluated the activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T), and comparators against clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates collected for the global Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends (SMART) surveillance program in ten countries in the Middle East and Africa to augment scarce standardized surveillance data in this region. Methods: Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute broth microdilution and interpreted with European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing breakpoints. P. aeruginosa isolates testing with C/T MIC >4 mg/l or imipenem MIC >2 mg/l were screened for β-lactamase genes. Results: C/T was active against 91.4% and 87.0% of P. aeruginosa isolates from the Middle East and Africa, respectively (14-21 and 7-16 percentage points higher than most β-lactam comparators, respectively). Considerable variation in susceptibility was seen across countries, which largely correlated with the observed prevalence of carbapenemases and/or extended-spectrum β-lactamases. Differences across countries were smaller for C/T than for the β-lactam comparators, ranging from 81% C/T-susceptible among isolates from Jordan to 95% for Qatar. Among subsets resistant to meropenem, ceftazidime, or piperacillin/tazobactam, C/T maintained activity against 51-73% of isolates from the Middle East and against 27-54% from Africa (where metallo-β-lactamase and GES carbapenemase rates were higher). Conclusion: Given the desirability of β-lactam use among clinicians, C/T represents an important option in the treatment of infections caused by P. aeruginosa.

Abstract Background Historically, multi-drug resistant organisms have been associated with the ICU setting. The present study sought to define the frequency of isolation from ICU versus non-ICU, phenotypic and genotypic profiles of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CR-PA) from a global cohort. Methods Multicenter surveillance study (17 centers from 12 countries) including 672 CR-PA isolates from 2019 to 2021. Phenotypic carbapenemase testing was assessed. Genotypic carbapenemase testing was conducted (CarbaR and CarbaR NxG) to detect β-lactamases. Broth microdilution MICs were established for ceftazidime, cefepime, ceftolozane/tazobactam, and ceftazidime/avibactam. Results 59% of CR-PA were isolated from patients outside the ICU. The most common source in ICU and non-ICU patients was respiratory (55% and 30%, respectively). In the ICU, 35% of isolates were phenotypically carbapenemase-positive versus 29% for non-ICU. VIM was the most common carbapenemase (54% and 44%, respectively) followed by GES (27% and 28%, respectively). Susceptibility to ceftazidime or cefepime were relatively low in ICU (39% and 41% of isolates, respectively) and non-ICU (47% and 52% of isolates, respectively). Ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam were more active with 56% and 66% of isolates susceptible in the ICU while 65% and 76% in non-ICU, respectively. When carbapenemase-negative, 86% and 88% of ICU isolates were susceptible to ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam. Similarly, in the carbapenemase-negative, non-ICU isolates 88% and 92% of isolates were susceptible, respectively. Conclusion Although multidrug resistant pathogens are often regarded as a challenge in the ICU population, the majority of CR-PA were isolated from non-ICU patients. Implementing phenotypic/genotypic testing will assist in guiding treatment. Carbapenem-resistance in P. aeruginosa should be regarded as a surrogate for MDR and this phenotype is increasingly prevalent outside the ICU.

Michael Pfaller,1,2 Dee Shortridge,1 Wei-Ting Chen,3 Helio Sader,1 Mariana Castanheira1 1JMI Laboratories, North Liberty, IA, USA; 2University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA; 3Merck & Co., Inc, Kenilworth, NJ, USACorrespondence: Dee Shortridge, JMI Laboratories, 345 Beaver Kreek Centre, Suite A, North Liberty, IA, 52317, USA, Tel +1 319-665-3370, Fax +1319-665-3371, Email dee-shortridge@jmilabs.comPurpose: To evaluate the in vitro activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam and comparator agents tested against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacterales isolates from hospitalised patients in Asia. Ceftolozane/tazobactam is an antipseudomonal cephalosporin combined with a well-established β-lactamase inhibitor.Methods: A total of 2038 Gram-negative organisms (376 P. aeruginosa and 1662 Enterobacterales) were collected consecutively using a prevalence-based approach from 11 medical centres. Organisms were susceptibility tested by broth microdilution according to CLSI guidelines. CLSI and EUCAST breakpoint criteria were used.Results: Ceftolozane/tazobactam was the most potent (MIC50/90, 0.5/4 mg/L) β-lactam agent tested against P. aeruginosa isolates, inhibiting 91.0% of the isolates at an MIC of ≤ 4 mg/L. P. aeruginosa exhibited high rates of susceptibility to amikacin (92.0/92.0% [CLSI/EUCAST]) and colistin by EUCAST criteria only (99.2% intermediate [CLSI]/99.2% susceptible [EUCAST]). Ceftolozane/tazobactam (MIC50/90, 0.25/16 mg/L; 86.8/86.8% susceptible [CLSI/EUCAST]) and meropenem (MIC50/90, 0.03/0.12 mg/L; 93.0/93.3% susceptible [CLSI/EUCAST]) were the most active compounds tested against Enterobacterales. Isolates displayed susceptibility rates to other β-lactam agents, ranging from 81.5/77.7% for piperacillin/tazobactam, 66.0/64.5% for cefepime, and 65.3/60.9% for ceftazidime using CLSI/EUCAST breakpoints. Among the Enterobacterales isolates, 6.8% were carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and 29.6% exhibited an extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) non-CRE phenotype. Ceftolozane/tazobactam showed good activity against ESBL non-CRE phenotype strains of Enterobacterales (MIC50/90, 0.5/8 mg/L; 84.8/84.8% susceptible), but not against isolates with a CRE phenotype (MIC50/90, > 32/> 32 mg/L).Conclusion: Ceftolozane/tazobactam was the most active β-lactam agent tested against P. aeruginosa and demonstrated higher in vitro activity than the available cephalosporins when tested against Enterobacterales from Asian countries.Keywords: Asia, ceftolozane/tazobactam, drug resistance, Enterobacterales, P. aeruginosa, surveillance

ABSTRACT: Objectives: Ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) is a novel cephalosporin and β-lactamase inhibitor combination with great activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. To assess P. aeruginosa susceptibility to C/T, a surveillance study was conducted from October 2018 to March 2019 at the University Hospital ‘Ospedali Riuniti’ in Ancona, Italy. Methods: Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) to C/T were determined by Etest strip. Resistant isolates were characterized by phenotypic (broth microdilution antimicrobial susceptibility testing and modified Carbapenem Inactivation Method [mCIM]) and genotypic (Polymerase Chain Reaction [PCR], Pulsed Field Gel Electrophoresis [PFGE], and whole-genome sequencing [WGS]) methods. Clinical variables of patients infected by C/T-resistant P. aeruginosa were collected from medical records. Results: Fifteen of 317 P. aeruginosa collected showed resistance to C/T (4.7%). Ten strains demonstrated carbapenemase activity by mCIM method, and PCR confirmed that eight strains harbored a blaVIM gene while the other two were positive for blaIMP. Additionally, three isolates carried acquired extended spectrum β-lactamase genes (two isolates carried blaPER and one carried blaGES). Eight strains were strictly related by PFGE and WGS analysis confirmed that they belonged to sequence type (ST)111. The other STs found were ST175 (two isolates), ST235 (two isolates), ST70 (one isolate), ST621 (one isolate), and the new ST3354 (one isolate). Most patients had received previous antibiotic therapies, carried invasive devices, and experienced prolonged hospitalization. Conclusion: This study demonstrated the presence of C/T-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates in a regional hospital carrying a number of resistance mechanisms acquired by different high-risk clones.

Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria-related infections have become a real public health problem and have exposed the risk of a therapeutic impasse. In recent years, many new antibiotics have been introduced to enrich the therapeutic armamentarium. Among these new molecules, some are mainly of interest for the treatment of the multidrug-resistant infections associated with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ceftolozane/tazobactam and imipenem/relebactam); others are for carbapenem-resistant infections associated with Enterobacterales (ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam); and finally, there are others that are effective on the majority of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (cefiderocol). Most international guidelines recommend these new antibiotics in the treatment of microbiologically documented infections. However, given the significant morbidity and mortality of these infections, particularly in the case of inadequate therapy, it is important to consider the place of these antibiotics in probabilistic treatment. Knowledge of the risk factors for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (local ecology, prior colonization, failure of prior antibiotic therapy, and source of infection) seems necessary in order to optimize antibiotic prescriptions. In this review, we will assess these different antibiotics according to the epidemiological data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined for clinical gram-negative isolates from Czech Republic, Hungary, and Poland, where published data for ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) and imipenem/relebactam (IMI/REL) is scarce. C/T was active against 94.3% of Enterobacterales, 10–18% higher than the tested cephalosporins and piperacillin/tazobactam. IMI/REL was the most active tested agent against non-Morganellaceae Enterobacterales (99.7% susceptible). C/T was the most active among all studied agents except colistin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (96.0% susceptible); susceptibility to IMI/REL was 90.7%. C/T maintained activity against 73.7–85.3% of β-lactam-resistant or multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa subsets. C/T and IMI/REL could represent important treatment options for patients from these countries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BackgroundOvercoming β-lactam resistance in pathogens such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a major clinical challenge. Rapid molecular diagnostics (RMDs) have the potential to inform selection of empiric therapy in patients infected by P. aeruginosa.MethodsIn this study, we used a heterogeneous collection of 197 P. aeruginosa that included multidrug-resistant isolates to determine whether 2 representative RMDs (Acuitas Resistome test and VERIGENE gram-negative blood culture test) could identify susceptibility to 2 newer β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor (BL-BLI) combinations, ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) and ceftolozane/tazobactam (TOL/TAZO).ResultsWe found that the studied RMD platforms were able to correctly identify BL-BLI susceptibility (susceptibility sensitivity, 100%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 97%, 100%) for both BLs-BLIs. However, their ability to detect resistance to these BLs-BLIs was lower (resistance sensitivity, 66%; 95% CI, 52%, 78% for TOL/TAZO and 33%; 95% CI, 20%, 49% for CZA).ConclusionsThe diagnostic platforms studied showed the most potential in scenarios where a resistance gene was detected or in scenarios where a resistance gene was not detected and the prevalence of resistance to TOL/TAZO or CZA is known to be low. Clinicians need to be mindful of the benefits and risks that result from empiric treatment decisions that are based on resistance gene detection in P. aeruginosa, acknowledging that such decisions are impacted by the prevalence of resistance, which varies temporally and geographically.

Objectives: To explore the in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility among clinically important Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) in Taiwan. Methods: From 2016 through 2018, a total of 5458 GNB isolates, including Escherichia coli (n = 1545), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 1255), Enterobacter species (n = 259), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 1127), Acinetobacter baumannii complex (n = 368), and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (n = 179), were collected. The susceptibility results were summarized by the breakpoints of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of CLSI 2020, EUCAST 2020 (for colistin), or published articles (for ceftolozane/tazobactam). The resistance genes among multidrug-resistant (MDR) or extensively drug-resistant (XDR)-GNB were investigated by multiplex PCR. Results: Significantly higher rates of non-susceptibility (NS) to ertapenem and carbapenemase production, predominantly KPC and OXA-48-like beta-lactamase, were observed in Enterobacterales isolates causing respiratory tract infection than those causing complicated urinary tract or intra-abdominal infection (12.7%/3.44% vs. 5.7%/0.76% or 7.7%/0.97%, respectively). Isolates of Enterobacter species showed higher rates of phenotypic extended-spectrum β-lactamase and NS to ertapenem than E. coli or K. pneumoniae isolates. Although moderate activity (54–83%) was observed against most potential AmpC-producing Enterobacterales isolates, ceftolozane/tazobactam exhibited poor in vitro (44.7–47.4%) activity against phenotypic AmpC Enterobacter cloacae isolates. Additionally, 251 (22.3%) P. aeruginosa isolates exhibited the carbapenem-NS phenotype, and their MDR and XDR rate was 63.3% and 33.5%, respectively. Fifteen (75%) of twenty Burkholderia cenocepacia complex isolates were inhibited by ceftolozane/tazobactam at MICs of ≤4 μg/mL. Conclusions: With the increase in antibiotic resistance in Taiwan, it is imperative to periodically monitor the susceptibility profiles of clinically important GNB.

Objectives: Antimicrobial resistance is one of the top 10 global public-health threats. Especially high rates of resistance have been reported for isolates from ICU patients, requiring expanded treatment options in this setting. We evaluated the activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam and comparators against Gram-negative isolates collected from patients with lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) in ICUs in seven Asian countries. Methods: In 2017–2019, up to 100 consecutive, aerobic Gram-negative LRTI isolates were collected per year at each of 37 hospitals. MICs were determined using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute reference broth microdilution method. Results: Overall, ceftolozane/tazobactam was active against 72% of 1408 Enterobacterales and 86% of 761 Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates. Susceptibility to the non-carbapenem β-lactam comparators, including piperacillin/tazobactam, was 52–67% among Enterobacterales isolates, and the activity of all β-lactam comparators, including meropenem, was 57–70% among P. aeruginosa. Ceftolozane/tazobactam maintained activity against 61% of meropenem-nonsusceptible and 64% of piperacillin/tazobactam-nonsusceptible P. aeruginosa. At the country-level, ceftolozane/tazobactam activity ranged from >90% against Enterobacterales from Hong Kong and South Korea to 90% against P. aeruginosa from South Korea, Malaysia, Philippines and Taiwan to

Complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs) lead to high morbidity and mortality, especially if poorly managed. However, Indonesia's microbial pattern and susceptibility data are limited, especially for new antibiotics. Ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) is reported to be a new potent antibiotic against various pathogens. Thus, we aim to investigate C/T in vitro activity against clinical isolates from cIAI patients. This prospective cross-sectional study was conducted in three major referral hospitals in Indonesia, including Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital (Jakarta), Dr. Kariadi Hospital (Semarang), and Dr. Soetomo Hospital (Surabaya), enrolling those diagnosed with cIAIs. Blood specimens were collected before or after at least 72 h of the last antibiotic administration. Meanwhile, tissue biopsy/aspirate specimens were collected intraoperatively. These specimens were cultured, followed by a susceptibility test for specific pathogens. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of isolates was determined according to CLSI M100. Two-hundred-and-eighty-four patients were enrolled from 2019–2021. Blood culture was dominated by Gram-positive bacteria (GPB, n = 25, 52.1%), whereas abdominal tissue culture was dominated by Gram-negative bacteria (GNB, n = 268, 79.5%). The three most common organisms were GNB, including E. coli, K. pneumoniae, and P. aeruginosa. C/T was susceptible in 96.7%, 70.2%, and 94.1% of the E. coli, K. pneumoniae, and P. aeruginosa isolates, respectively. In addition, C/T also remained active against ESBL Enterobacterales and carbapenem-non-susceptible P. aeruginosa. Overall, C/T demonstrates a high potency against GNB isolates and can be considered an agent for carbapenem-sparing strategy for cIAI patients as the susceptibility is proven. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• We evaluated the activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. • C/T was active against 91.4% and 87.0% of isolates from the Middle East and Africa. • This activity was higher than that of any of the tested β-lactam comparators. • Antimicrobial activity and prevalence of β-lactamases varied across countries. • C/T represents an important option in the treatment of infections caused by P. aeruginosa. We evaluated the activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T), and comparators against clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates collected for the global Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends (SMART) surveillance program in ten countries in the Middle East and Africa to augment scarce standardized surveillance data in this region. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute broth microdilution and interpreted with European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing breakpoints. P. aeruginosa isolates testing with C/T MIC >4 mg/l or imipenem MIC >2 mg/l were screened for β-lactamase genes. C/T was active against 91.4% and 87.0% of P. aeruginosa isolates from the Middle East and Africa, respectively (14-21 and 7-16 percentage points higher than most β-lactam comparators, respectively). Considerable variation in susceptibility was seen across countries, which largely correlated with the observed prevalence of carbapenemases and/or extended-spectrum β-lactamases. Differences across countries were smaller for C/T than for the β-lactam comparators, ranging from 81% C/T-susceptible among isolates from Jordan to 95% for Qatar. Among subsets resistant to meropenem, ceftazidime, or piperacillin/tazobactam, C/T maintained activity against 51-73% of isolates from the Middle East and against 27-54% from Africa (where metallo-β-lactamase and GES carbapenemase rates were higher). Given the desirability of β-lactam use among clinicians, C/T represents an important option in the treatment of infections caused by P. aeruginosa. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Historically, multi-drug resistant organisms have been associated with the ICU setting. The present study sought to define the frequency of isolation from ICU versus non-ICU, phenotypic and genotypic profiles of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CR-PA) from a global cohort. Methods: Multicenter surveillance study (17 centers from 12 countries) including 672 CR-PA isolates from 2019 to 2021. Phenotypic carbapenemase testing was assessed. Genotypic carbapenemase testing was conducted (CarbaR and CarbaR NxG) to detect β-lactamases. Broth microdilution MICs were established for ceftazidime, cefepime, ceftolozane/tazobactam, and ceftazidime/avibactam. Results: 59% of CR-PA were isolated from patients outside the ICU. The most common source in ICU and non-ICU patients was respiratory (55% and 30%, respectively). In the ICU, 35% of isolates were phenotypically carbapenemase-positive versus 29% for non-ICU. VIM was the most common carbapenemase (54% and 44%, respectively) followed by GES (27% and 28%, respectively). Susceptibility to ceftazidime or cefepime were relatively low in ICU (39% and 41% of isolates, respectively) and non-ICU (47% and 52% of isolates, respectively). Ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam were more active with 56% and 66% of isolates susceptible in the ICU while 65% and 76% in non-ICU, respectively. When carbapenemase-negative, 86% and 88% of ICU isolates were susceptible to ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam. Similarly, in the carbapenemase-negative, non-ICU isolates 88% and 92% of isolates were susceptible, respectively. Conclusion: Although multidrug resistant pathogens are often regarded as a challenge in the ICU population, the majority of CR-PA were isolated from non-ICU patients. Implementing phenotypic/genotypic testing will assist in guiding treatment. Carbapenem-resistance in P. aeruginosa should be regarded as a surrogate for MDR and this phenotype is increasingly prevalent outside the ICU. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Antimicrobial resistance is continuously increasing. Adding tazobactam to ceftolozane improves the latter’s activity spectrum against resistant strains. We aimed to determine the susceptibility of recently collected bacterial isolates to ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) and other antibiotics. Methods: This was a prospective cohort study conducted between March 2017 and March 2018. The in-vitro activities of C/T and 14 other antibiotics were assessed against 192 gram-negative bacterial (GNB) isolates (P. aeruginosa, K. pneumonia, E. coli, and other Enterobacterales) prospectively collected from two hospitals in Saudi arabia; in the laboratories of the International Health Management Associates Inc. Samples were obtained from intensive care units (ICUs) and non-ICU locations. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of the antibiotics were determined by broth microdilution. Isolates were obtained from different infection sites [urine (31.8%), urinary bladder samples (15.1%), abscess/pus (20.3%), endotracheal aspirates (18.8%)]. Results: Our sample showed substantial drug resistance; 66.1% of the collected isolates showed either multiple or extensive drug resistance. Susceptibility rates of P. aeruginosa (n = 50), E.coli (n = 40), K. pneumoniae (n = 64) and other Enterobacterales (n = 38) to C/T were 74%, 87.5%, 48.4% and 71.1%, respectively. According to MIC50 values (1 µg/mL for both P. aeruginosa and other Enterobacterales, 0.5 µg/mL for E.coli, and 4 µg/mL for K. pneumoniae), C/T was among the most potent antibiotics against these isolates. Conclusions: C/T displayed high potency against all examined bacterial isolates. It was mainly active against E.coli followed by P.aeruginosa and other Enterobacterales and its lowest susceptibility rate was reported against K. pneumoniae.

ABSTRACT: Objectives: Treatment options are limited for melioidosis patients who develop nosocomial infections due to extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Gram-negative bacilli. Ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) and ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA), which have activity against XDR Gram-negative bacteria, are two potential options. Data regarding the susceptibility of Burkholderia pseudomallei to these agents are limited, especially from Thailand, which is an endemic area for melioidosis. Methods: A total of 28 B. pseudomallei isolates from melioidosis patients in northeast Thailand were tested for susceptibility to C/T and CZA by Etest and the disk diffusion method. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for other antibiotics commonly used in melioidosis, including trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (SXT), ceftazidime (CAZ), imipenem (IPM) and meropenem, were also determined. Results: The MIC of C/T was very low for all isolates, ranging from 0.75 μg/mL to 1.0 μg/mL. For CZA, wide inhibitory zones ranging from 34–35 mm and MICs at 0.5 μg/mL were found. All isolates were also susceptible to SXT, CAZ and IPM based on Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) breakpoints. Conclusion: C/T and CZA exhibited excellent in vitro activity against B. pseudomallei. Further studies are required to prove efficacy in human subjects.

Objectives: Identify molecular mechanisms responsible for the in vitro nonsusceptibility to ceftolozane/tazobactam (TOL) in a group of 158 clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from five Latin American countries collected before the introduction of TOL into the clinical practice. Methods: Clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa (n = 504) were collected between January 2016 and October 2017 from 20 hospitals located in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, and Mexico. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) to TOL were determined by standard broth microdilution and interpreted according to CLSI breakpoints. Initially, production of carbapenemases in TOL nonsusceptible isolates was assessed by Rapidec® followed by qPCR to detect blaKPC, blaNDM-1, blaVIM, and blaIMP. Illumina® WGS was performed for isolates in which non-susceptibility to TOL was not mediated by carbapenemases. Results: A total of 158 (31.3%) isolates were non-susceptible to TOL. In 74 (46.8%) of these isolates, non-susceptibility to TOL was explained by the production of at least one carbapenemase. WGS revealed that some isolates carried ESBLs, mutated blaPDC and ampD, associated with decreased susceptibility to TOL. Conclusion: Substitutions found in PDC and carbapenemase production were the most common presumed mechanisms of resistance to TOL detected in this study. This study shows that epidemiological surveillance is warranted to monitor the emergence of novel mechanisms of resistance to TOL that might compromise its clinical utility. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of the study was to evaluate the EUCAST RAST method by extending analysis to 16–20 h reading time and performance with new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations. A total of 676 positive blood cultures (BCs) were enrolled. Results at 4 h, 6 h, 8 h and 16–20 h were interpreted according to bacterial species using EUCAST RAST breakpoints (version 5.1). For species for which no breakpoints were available, tentative breakpoints were used. Categorical agreement with the Microscan microdilution system was analysed. Among the 676 BCs enrolled, 641 were monomicrobial and were included in the analysis. Categorical agreement ranged from 98.9% at 4 h to 99.4% at 16–20 h. The rates of very major errors were 3.3%, 3.7% and 3.4% at 4 h, 6 h and 8 h, respectively, and decreased to 1% at 16–20 h (p < 0.001). The number of major errors was low for each reading time (0.2% and 0.4% at 4 h and 6 h, respectively, and 0.3% at both 8 h and 16–20 h). The proportions of results in the area of technical uncertainty were 9.9%, 5.9%, 5% and 5.2% for readings at 4 h, 6 h, 8 h and 16–20 h, respectively. Tentative breakpoints proposed for Enterobacterales other than E.coli/K.pneumoniae and coagulase-negative staphylococci showed overall performances comparable to those observed for E. coli/K. pneumoniae and S. aureus. In conclusion, EUCAST RAST has been shown to be reliable to determine microbial susceptibility to main antimicrobials, including ceftazidime/avibactam and ceftolozane/tazobactam. A poorer performance was observed for certain species/antimicrobial agent combinations. The better performance observed at 16–20 h compared to the early readings may confer to the method greater potential for antimicrobial de-escalation interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) is a combination of an antipseudomonal oxyiminoaminothiazolyl cephalosporin with potent in vitro activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and tazobactam, a known β-lactamase inhibitor. The aim of this study was to evaluate the activity of C/T against clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa and Enterobacterales collected from five Latin American countries between 2016 and 2017, before its clinical use in Latin America, and to compare it with the activity of other available broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents. Methods: a total of 2760 clinical isolates (508 P. aeruginosa and 2252 Enterobacterales) were consecutively collected from 20 hospitals and susceptibility to C/T and comparator agents was tested and interpreted following the current guidelines. Results: according to the CLSI breakpoints, 68.1% (346/508) of P. aeruginosa and 83.9% (1889/2252) of Enterobacterales isolates were susceptible to C/T. Overall, C/T demonstrated higher in vitro activity than currently available cephalosporins, piperacillin/tazobactam and carbapenems when tested against P. aeruginosa, and its performance in vitro was comparable to fosfomycin. When tested against Enterobacterales, it showed higher activity than cephalosporins and piperacillin/tazobactam, and similar activity to ertapenem. Conclusions: these results show that C/T is an active β-lactam agent against clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa and Enterobacterales. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: We report results from the national CLEAR (Canadian Leadership on Antimicrobial Real-Life Usage) registry on the usage of ceftolozane/tazobactam in Canada from 2022 to 2024., Research Design and Methods: The authors reviewed the final data using the national ethics approved CLEAR study. Thereafter, the literature is surveyed regarding the usage of ceftolozane/tazobactam to treat patients with HABP and VABP via PubMed (up to May 2024)., Results: Ceftolozane/tazobactam was primarily used as directed therapy to treat HABP and VABP caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa . It was primarily used alone, or in combination with another agent, to treat resistant and multidrug-resistant (MDR) P. aeruginosa infections. Despite primarily being used to treat severely ill patients in intensive care units, its use was associated with relatively high microbiological/clinical cure rates, along with an excellent safety profile. Several reports attest to the microbiological/clinical efficacy and safety of using ceftolozane/tazobactam to treat HABP and VABP., Conclusions: In Canada, ceftolozane/tazobactam is primarily used as directed therapy alone, or in combination, to treat MDR P. aeruginosa infections. Though mostly used to treat severely ill patients in the ICU, ceftolozane/tazobactam use in HABP and VABP is associated with relatively high microbiological/clinical cure rates and an excellent safety profile.

Background: The potential for promotion of intestinal colonization with healthcare-associated pathogens by new antibiotics used to treat infections due to multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli is unclear., Methods: Mice treated for 3 days with daily subcutaneous phosphate-buffered saline (control), ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftaroline, and meropenem/vaborbactam were challenged with 10,000 colony-forming units (CFU) of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) resistant to each of the antibioics or carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae 1 day after the final treatment dose. The concentrations of VRE or K. pneumoniae in stool were measured on days 1, 3, 6, and 15 after challenge., Results: Control mice had transient low levels of VRE or K. pneumoniae (<3 log 10 CFU/g) detected in stool with negative cultures on days 6 and 15 after challenge. In comparison to control mice, each of the antibiotics promoted establishment of high-density colonization with VRE (mean concentration, >8 log 10 CFU/g of stool on day 1 after challenge) that persisted at >4 log 10 CFU/g of stool through day 15 ( P <0.01). In comparison to control mice, meropenem/vaborbactam and ceftaroline promoted high-density colonization with K. pneumoniae (peak concentration, >8 log 10 CFU/g of stool) ( P <0.01), ceftolozane/tazobactam promoted colonization to a lesser degree (peak concentration, >5 log 10 CFU/g of stool), and ceftazidime/avibactam did not promote colonization ( P >0.05)., Conclusions: Our results suggest that several beta-lactam antibiotics recently developed for treatment of infections with resistant Gram-negative bacilli have the potential to promote colonization by healthcare-associated pathogens. Additional studies are needed to examine the impact of these agents in patients., Competing Interests: The authors declare that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2024 Pathogens and Immunity.)

ObjectivesIdentify molecular mechanisms responsible for the in vitro non-susceptibility to ceftolozane/tazobactam (TOL) in a group of 158 clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from five Latin American countries collected before the introduction of TOL into the clinical practice.MethodsClinical isolates of P. aeruginosa (n = 504) were collected between January 2016 and October 2017 from 20 hospitals located in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, and Mexico. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) to TOL were determined by standard broth microdilution and interpreted according to CLSI breakpoints. Initially, production of carbapenemases in TOL non-susceptible isolates was assessed by Rapidec® followed by qPCR to detect blaKPC, blaNDM-1, blaVIM, and blaIMP. Illumina® WGS was performed for isolates in which non-susceptibility to TOL was not mediated by carbapenemases.ResultsA total of 158 (31.3%) isolates were non-susceptible to TOL. In 74 (46.8%) of these isolates, non-susceptibility to TOL was explained by the production of at least one carbapenemase. WGS revealed that some isolates carried ESBLs, mutated blaPDC and ampD, associated with decreased susceptibility to TOL.ConclusionSubstitutions found in PDC and carbapenemase production were the most common presumed mechanisms of resistance to TOL detected in this study. This study shows that epidemiological surveillance is warranted to monitor the emergence of novel mechanisms of resistance to TOL that might compromise its clinical utility.

Infections due to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are increasingly prevalent in children and are associated with poor clinical outcomes, especially in critically ill patients. Novel beta lactam antibiotics, including ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam, and cefiderocol, have been released in recent years to face the emerging challenge of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacteria. Nonetheless, several novel agents lack pediatric indications approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicine Agency (EMA), leading to uncertain pediatric-specific treatment strategies and uncertain dosing regimens in the pediatric population. In this narrative review we have summarized the available clinical and pharmacological data, current limitations and future prospects of novel beta lactam antibiotics in the pediatric population.

(1) Background: Ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) is a novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor with excellent activity against the multidrug-resistant (MDR) P. aeruginosa. Continuous infusion (CI) dosing allows the optimization of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) properties of β-lactam antibiotics and may support patients’ treatment as outpatients. (2) Methods: Adult patients receiving their entire course of C/T as a CI in the outpatient setting were retrospectively included in the study. The primary outcome evaluated was clinical resolution. The secondary outcomes evaluated were PK/PD target attainment (ƒT > 4 × MIC) and microbiologic clearance at the end of treatment. Therapeutic drug monitoring to assess C/T concentration was performed. (3) Results: Three patients were enrolled in the study and received 9 g of C/T in CI every 24 h. One patient received an additional course of antimicrobial therapy due to disease exacerbation six months after initial treatment, accounting for four evaluated treatments. The primary outcome was achieved in 3/4 treatments and the secondary outcome was achieved in 4/4 and 3/3, respectively. In all patients, free ceftolozane concentrations were >10 times higher than the EUCAST breakpoint (4 mg/L). (4) Conclusions: Elastomeric infusion of C/T delivered in CI can be an effective and convenient way to treat acute diseases caused by MDR-P. aeruginosa, avoid hospital admission, and contribute to infection control strategies. Despite the small number of enrolled patients, clinical and microbiological results support this strategy.

Antimicrobial resistance has become a significant public health problem globally with multidrug resistant Gram negative (MDR-GN) bacteria being the main representatives. The emergence of these pathogens in neonatal settings threatens the well-being of the vulnerable neonatal population given the dearth of safe and effective therapeutic options. Evidence from studies mainly in adults is now available for several novel antimicrobial compounds, such as new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors (e.g., ceftazidime–avibactam, meropenem–vaborbactam, imipenem/cilastatin–relebactam), although old antibiotics such as colistin, tigecycline, and fosfomycin are also encompassed in the fight against MDR-GN infections that remain challenging. Data in the neonatal population are scarce, with few clinical trials enrolling neonates for the evaluation of the efficacy, safety, and dosing of new antibiotics, while the majority of old antibiotics are used off-label. In this article we review data about some novel and old antibiotics that are active against MDR-GN bacteria causing sepsis and are of interest to be used in the neonatal population.

Objective: To evaluate the real‐world clinical efficacy of ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) in difficult‐to‐treat infections caused by multi‐drug resistant Gram‐negative microorganisms, including carbapenem‐resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of adult patients treated with C/T for at least 48 hours for infections caused by multi‐drug resistant Gram‐negative bacteria in a tertiary hospital from May 2016 until August 2019. The primary outcome analysed was clinical failure, defined as a composite of symptomatology persistence after 7 days of C/T treatment, infection recurrence, and/or all‐cause mortality within 30 days of follow‐up. Results and discussion: 96 episodes of C/T treatment were included, mostly consisting of targeted treatments (83.9%) for the following sources of infection: intra‐abdominal (22.6%), urinary tract (25.8%), skin and soft tissue (19.4%), hospital‐acquired pneumonia (14%), and other (6.4%). The most frequently isolated bacteria were carbapenem‐resistant (88, 94.6%). Clinical failure rate was 30.1%, due to persistent infection at day 7 (4.3%), recurrence of the initial infection (16.1%), or 30‐day all‐cause mortality (8.6%). Adverse events most frequently reported were Clostridium difficile infection (9%) and cholestasis (8%). What is new and conclusion: C/T showed a favourable clinical profile for difficult‐to‐treat multidrug‐resistant and carbapenem‐resistant Gram‐negative infections, regardless of the source of infection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the past 15 years, treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB) has represented an intricate challenge for clinicians. In this perspective article, we discuss the available clinical data about novel agents for the treatment of CR-GNB VAP, together with general pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic principles for the treatment of VAP, in the attempt to provide some suggestions for optimizing antimicrobial therapy of CR-GNB VAP in the daily clinical practice. Recently, novel β-lactams and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations have become available that have shown potent in vitro activity against CR-GNB and have attracted much interest as novel, less toxic, and possibly more efficacious options for the treatment of CR-GNB VAP compared with previous standard of care. Besides randomized controlled trials, a good solution to enrich our knowledge on how to use these novel agents at best in the near future, while at the same time remaining adherent to current evidence-based guidelines, is to improve our collaboration to conduct larger multinational observational studies to collect sufficiently large populations treated in real life with those novel agents for which guidelines currently do not provide a recommendation (in favor or against) for certain causative organisms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Antimicrobial resistance is a global public health threat, and gram-negative bacteria, such as Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, are particularly problematic with difficult-to-treat resistance phenotypes. To reduce morbidity and mortality, a reduction in the time to effective antimicrobial therapy (TTET) is needed, especially among critically ill patients. The antibiogram is an effective clinical tool that can provide accurate antimicrobial susceptibility information and facilitate early antimicrobial optimization, decrease TTET, and improve outcomes such as mortality, hospital length of stay, and costs. Guidance is lacking on how to validate the susceptibility to new antibacterial agents. Commonly used traditional and combination antibiograms may not adequately assist clinicians in making treatment decisions. Challenges with the current susceptibility testing of new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations persist, impacting the appropriate antibacterial choice and patient outcomes. Novel antibiograms such as syndromic antibiograms that incorporate resistant gram-negative phenotypes and/or minimum inhibitory concentration distributions may assist in determining the need for earlier susceptibility testing or help define an earlier optimal use of the new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors. The purpose of this review is to emphasize novel antibiogram approaches that are capable of improving the time to susceptibility testing and administration for new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors so that they are earlier in a patient's treatment course. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections are challenging to treat due to multi-drug resistance (MDR) and the complexity of the patients affected by these serious infections. As new antibiotic therapies come on the market, limited data exist about the effectiveness of such treatments in clinical practice. In this comparative effectiveness study of ceftolozane/tazobactam versus aminoglycoside- or polymyxin-based therapies among hospitalized patients with positive MDR P. aeruginosa cultures, we identified 57 patients treated with ceftolozane/tazobactam compared with 155 patients treated with aminoglycoside- or polymyxin-based regimens. Patients treated with ceftolozane/tazobactam were younger (mean age 67.5 vs. 71.1, p = 0.03) and had a higher comorbidity burden prior to hospitalization (median Charlson 5 vs. 3, p = 0.01) as well as higher rates of spinal cord injury (38.6% vs. 21.9%, p = 0.02) and P. aeruginosa-positive bone/joint cultures (12.3% vs. 0.7%, p < 0.0001). Inpatient mortality was significantly lower in the ceftolozane/tazobactam group compared with aminoglycosides or polymyxins (15.8% vs. 27.7%, adjusted odds ratio 0.39, 95% confidence interval 0.16–0.93). There were no significant differences observed for the other outcomes assessed. In hospitalized patients with MDR P. aeruginosa, inpatient mortality was 61% lower among patients treated with ceftolozane/tazobactam compared to those treated with aminoglycoside- or polymyxin-based regimens. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ABSTRACT: Objectives: Ceftolozane/tazobactam is a cephalosporin/β-lactamase inhibitor combination with activity against Gram-negative bacilli. Here we report the use of ceftolozane/tazobactam in Canada using a national registry. Methods: The CLEAR registry uses a REDCapTM online survey to capture details associated with clinical use of ceftolozane/tazobactam. Results: Data from 51 patients treated in 2020 with ceftolozane/tazobactam are available. Infections treated included hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (37.3% of patients), ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (15.7%), bone and joint infection (11.8%), complicated intra-abdominal infection (7.8%) and complicated skin and skin-structure infection (7.8%). Moreover, 17.6% of patients had bacteraemia and 47.1% were in intensive care. Ceftolozane/tazobactam was primarily used as directed therapy for Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections (92.2% of patients). Ceftolozane/tazobactam was used because of resistance to (86.3%), failure of (11.8%) or adverse effects from (2.0%) previously prescribed antimicrobials. Ceftolozane/tazobactam susceptibility testing was performed on isolates from 88.2% of patients. Ceftolozane/tazobactam was used in combination with another antimicrobial active against Gram-negative bacilli in 39.2% of patients [aminoglycosides (15.7%), fluoroquinolones (9.8%) and colistin/polymyxin B (7.8%)]. The dosage regimen was customised in all patients based on creatinine clearance. The treatment duration was primarily >10 days (60.8% of patients), with microbiological success in 60.5% and clinical success in 64.4% of patients. Moreover, 7.8% of patients had adverse effects not requiring drug discontinuation. Conclusion: In Canada, ceftolozane/tazobactam is used as directed therapy to treat a variety of severe infections caused by multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa. It is commonly used in combination with other antimicrobials with relatively high microbiological/clinical cure rates and an excellent safety profile.