Search

Objective: Abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) is a prevalent condition in reproductive-aged women that significantly decreases the quality of life. A thorough history is necessary to determine the causes of AUB, which were categorized by the AUB System 2 (PALM-COEIN). AUB has been associated with retained intrauterine objects. However, studies regarding AUB caused by retained stitches of the cervical cerclage were limited., Case Report: We present two cases of AUB caused by retained stitches of the cervical cerclage. Both cases were successfully treated by removing the retained stitches by hysteroscopy., Conclusion: A comprehensive history is crucial to AUB evaluation, especially a previous history of iatrogenic processes, such as intrauterine device placement, retained cerclage stitches, or other foreign bodies., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Introduction: In women with cervical incompetence, transvaginal cerclage may help prevent preterm birth. However, training for this procedure poses challenges due to the low number of cases and difficulties in visualizing the operative field. Furthermore, the objective criteria for a successful cerclage procedure are not well-described. Quality assessment relies heavily on self-assessment rather than objective criteria and feedback. To address this issue, training on a simulator may offer a solution. We aimed to objectively assess surgical performance and compare it to the self-assessed performance in transvaginal cerclage procedures., Materials and Methods: During the Nordic Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG) congress in 2023, surgeons proficient in transvaginal cerclage procedures performed a transvaginal cerclage on a simulator. To compare the observed and self-assessed outcomes we obtained measurements on the cerclage height and number of bites from the detachable cervix, and from computed tomography scans we analyzed suture bite depth, reduction of cervix surface area, and whether cerclages had perforated the cervical canal. The same outcomes were self-assessed by each participant after the cerclage procedure. We visualized the continuous paired data in a Bland-Altman plot and compared these data with a paired t-test. Paired binary data was analyzed using McNemars test., Results: 29 participants from eight different nationalities performed one transvaginal cerclage each. The mean height of the cerclage was 26.8 mm (SD 9 mm) and mean depth was 6.5 mm (SD 1.9 mm) across a mean of 4.1 (SD 0.8) bites. The mean reduction of the cervix surface area was 7.6 % (SD 5.9 %). Two sutures perforated the cervical canal. The participants significantly underestimated the height of their cerclage with a mean difference of 6.0 mm (95 % CI 2.1-9.9), (p 0.002), between the observed and the self-assessed height, but otherwise revealed good self-assessment of their performed procedure., Conclusions: Overall, the experienced cerclage surgeons showed a genuine insight into their surgical performance of a transvaginal cerclage. These results could warrant development of a procedural guidelines with objective measures, now reassured that surgeons are capable of self-assessing their procedures., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: G. Tydeman and A. H. Shennan are inventors of the simulator. G Tydeman receives personal royalties from Limbs&Things Ltd with A Shennan receiving royalties to his institution. The remaining authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Cervical cerclage is an established intervention for the management of pregnancies at high risk of preterm birth. Although studies exist to support its use in certain situations, particularly in singleton pregnancies, many questions such as adjunct therapies and efficacy in specific subgroups of high-risk women have not been fully elucidated. This review will assess the current evidence as well as areas where there is currently a paucity of data and an urgent requirement for further research., (© 2024 The Author(s). BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objective: Previous studies have indicated that there is an association between cervical cerclage and type of suture material. However, it is still unclear which suture material can provide the greatest benefit to patients who have undergone cerclage. This study investigated the effect of two different suture materials (Mersilene tape vs braided suture) used for transvaginal cervical cerclage placement on maternal outcomes of women with cervical insufficiency., Methods: In this retrospective case-control study, 170 women who underwent history-, ultrasound-, or physical examination-indicated transvaginal cervical cerclage were categorized according to suture materials used for cerclage: a total of 96 received Mersilene tape and 74 received braided suture. Study participants received a transvaginal cervical cerclage before 28 weeks and were followed up until delivery to assess pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. The primary outcome was gestational age at delivery. Secondary outcomes included preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM), premature rupture of membranes (PROM), chorioamnionitis, neonatal survival rate, and neonatal morbidity., Results: Out of 170 eligible women, 74 (43.5%) received braided suture while 96 (56.5%) received Mersilene tape. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. The group that received braided suture had a lower incidence of gestational age at delivery <37 weeks (29.2% vs 54.2%, P = 0.046), PPROM (9.5% vs 21.9%, P = 0.029) and PROM (17.6% vs 32.3%, P = 0.028) compared to the group that received Mersilene tape. However, there were no significant differences between the two groups in average gestational age at delivery, the rate of gestational age at delivery <24, <28, <32, and < 34 weeks, chorioamnionitis, and neonatal survival rate, as well as neonatal morbidity., Conclusion: Compared to Mersilene tape, the utilization of braided suture has been significantly associated with a reduction in the incidence of gestational age at delivery <37 weeks, as well as a decreased risk of PPROM and PROM. However, the use of braided sutures did not result in discernible differences in the rates of chorioamnionitis or adverse neonatal outcomes., (© 2024 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.)

Background: Preterm birth (PTB), complications of which account for approximately 35% of deaths among neonates, remains a crucial issue. Cervical insufficiency (CI) is defined as the inability of the utrine cervix to retain a pregnancy, leading to PTB. Cervical cerclage is an efficient surgery for CI patients by preventing the cervix from being further mechanically shortened. Unfortunately, a certain number of patients who had cerclage still delivered prematurely, raising the urgent need to accurately assess the risk of PTB in patients with cerclage. Uterine electromyography (uEMG) is an emerging technology that characterizes uterine contractions by describing the actual evolution process of uterine activity and has been used to predict PTB in recent years., Method: In this single-center retrospective case-control study, singleton pregnancy women who received cervical cerclage and uEMG assessment between January 2018 and January 2022 at the Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University were enrolled., Results: 32 PTBs were observed of the 69 women who underwent assessment. Based on multivariate logistic regression analysis, PTB after cerclage was significantly associated with previous PTB history or mid-trimester pregnancy loss (OR: 2.87, 95%CI: 1.49-5.54) and contraction frequency detected by uEMG (OR: 2.24, 95%CI: 1.44-3.49). The AUC of contraction frequency (0.766, P<0.001) was observed, and the optimal cut-off value suggested by Youden Index was 1.75 times per hour. Combined with previous preterm history and cervical length, the AUC of contraction frequency reached 0.858. After stratification by contraction frequency, the median duration was 11 weeks in the high frequency group (> 1.75 times per hour) and 15 weeks in the low frequency group (≤ 1.75 times per hour) (P<0.001)., Conclusions: The uEMG effectively predicts PTB after transvaginal cervical cerclage and provides a new method for clinicians to evaluate the pregnancy outcome of CI patients., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Aim: Laparoscopic hysteropexy is a complicated procedure that requires specialized surgical skills, including precise dissection and suturing. The aim is to describe the technical considerations for performing a new, feasible, and minimally invasive technique to correct apical and concurrent apical and anterior vaginal wall defects., Method: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 70 consecutive women who underwent surgery for stage ≥3 uterovaginal prolapse. As a part of the technique, an anterior 2-cm long transverse incision was made at the anterior cervicovaginal junction, and the bladder was dissected through blunt and sharp dissection to the level of the isthmus. A posterior colpotomy was performed. A polypropylene tape was inserted into the cervical connective tissue, and the free arms of the tape were inserted into the peritoneum via the posterior colpotomy. Two arms of the tape were passed from the tunnel parallel and medial to a right sacrouterine fold, then fixed to the anterior longitudinal ligament via the laparoscopic route., Results: The tape can be inserted into the cervix in a median of 15 min, and the laparoscopy procedure can be completed in 24 min. No mesh erosion or long-term complications occurred. At a 1-year control, there were no cases of recurrence., Conclusions: This novel cervico-sacrocolpopexy technique is a feasible and safe, minimally invasive way to correct apical or multicompartment defects, with a short operation time and an anatomical result that mimics the normal sacrouterine ligament., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: There are no systematic reviews analyzing cervical cerclage's role in improving the perinatal outcome of the second twin in dichorionic diamniotic (DCDA) pregnancies following a second trimester or very early preterm birth of the first twin., Objective: The primary objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the effect of rescue cervical cerclage on delaying the delivery of the second twin after the delivery of the first twin in DCDA twin pregnancies. The secondary objective was to analyze the effect of rescue cervical cerclage on the perinatal outcome of the second twin in DCDA pregnancies compared to the non-cerclage group., Methods: A literature search was performed using PubMed, Medline databases, and the Cochrane Library. The studies selected were limited to human subjects and published online by December 2023. Two sets of results in this systematic review are described; the first set includes the outcomes of pregnancies with a DCDA twin pregnancy from the cohort of case series. The meta-analysis was performed for the cohort, and a combined narrative report was provided for the second set of results for the case reports., Results: A literature search resulted in 27 case series and 36 case reports. The case series analysis demonstrated that the mean gestation age of twin 2 at delivery with cervical cerclage (27.5 weeks) compared to those without cervical cerclage (24.4 weeks) was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Furthermore, analysis of the case series showed that twin 2 with cerclage had a statistically significant increase in latency period (days 44.7 vs 23.67) and birth weight (grams 3320 vs 2460) compared to the group without cerclage (p = -value was 0.001 and 0.01, respectively). It is difficult to draw any significant conclusion with complications of cervical cerclage; however, there were slightly more chorioamnionitis and respiratory distress syndrome in the cerclage group. The case report analysis showed no significant difference with or without cervical cerclage., Conclusions: From this review, it can be concluded that in DCDA twin pregnancies, cervical cerclage insertion after the extremely premature delivery or miscarriage of twin 1 may increase the gestational age at delivery, prolong the delivery interval, and increase the birth weight of twin 2. However, a large prospective multicenter randomized control trial should be performed to assess the benefit of cervical cerclage in DCDA twins to improve the delivery interval latency period and perinatal outcome of twin 2 after the delivery of twin 1., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the obstetric outcomes of transabdominal cerclage (TAC) in Japan., Methods: Questionnaires on TAC were sent to 183 institutions performing high-quality perinatal management in Japan. As a first-step questionnaire, we asked whether TAC was performed between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2022. In the second step of the questionnaire, the characteristics of all cases were asked from all institutions in which TAC was performed., Results: The response rate for the first survey was 59% (108/183). Of the 108 institutions, 27 performed TAC (25%) in 133 pregnancies. Of these 27 institutions, 19 responded to the second survey. One hundred twenty-five pregnancies were included in this study, five of which were aborted (gestational weeks <22 weeks), and 69 babies were born after 37 gestational weeks (55%). Eighty-two open abdominal cerclages were performed at 17 institutions and 43 laparoscopic TACs at three institutions. There were no differences in the age at TAC, gestational weeks at TAC, operative time of TAC, gestational weeks at delivery, incidence rate of second-trimester loss, or preterm delivery (before 37 gestational weeks) rate between the two groups. However, blood loss during open TAC was greater than that during laparoscopic TAC., Conclusion: TAC is a rare surgery for cervical insufficiency in Japan. TAC may be a safe and useful method for preventing second-trimester loss and preterm delivery in high-risk patients. TAC may also be a key option in Japan to improve perinatal outcomes in patients with cervical insufficiency., (© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.)

Objective: To compare the maternal and neonatal morbidity in patients with transvaginal (TVC) versus transabdominal (TAC) cerclage., Materials and Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients who received cervical cerclage and terminated the pregnancy in the second trimester or third trimester in two tertiary hospitals. Data on basic clinical characteristics, predelivery maternal morbidity, intrapartum morbidity, postpartum morbidity and neonatal morbidity of TVC patients and TAC patients were analysed and compared., Results: Seventy-two TVC patients and 120 TAC patients were included. The rates of abnormal fetal presentation and placental disorders were significantly higher in TAC patients than that in TVC patients (21.67% vs 5.56% and 18.33% vs 4.17%, respectively). The rates of premature rupture of membranes and intrauterine infection were significantly higher in TVC patients than that in TAC patients (25.00% vs 2.50% and 11.23% vs 3.33%, respectively). Compared with TVC patients, the rates of estimated intrapartum hemorrhage ≥500 ml, uterine rupture and cesarean delivery in the third trimester were significantly higher in TAC patients than in TVC patients. Gestational age at delivery and neonatal morbidity were comparable between TVC patients and TAC patients., Conclusion: Compared with TVC patients, TAC patients were associated with a significantly higher incidence of maternal morbidity in placental disorders, abnormal fetal presentation, intrapartum hemorrhage ≥500 ml and uterine rupture., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest We declare that there are no potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Introduction: The management of women with premature cervical dilatation and exposed unruptured fetal membranes remains uncertain and controversial. Treatment options may include expectant management or emergency cervical cerclage (ECC). Little is known regarding the effectiveness of individual interventions, or additional therapies. This systematic review aims to summarise all existing evidence to improve understanding of the treatment options and pregnancy outcomes for women presenting with premature cervical dilatation., Methods: Databases were searched using a prospective protocol (CRD42021286275). Studies were eligible for inclusion across five distinct comparison groups if they included women with premature cervical dilatation and reported clinical outcomes. Primary outcome was pregnancy loss (miscarriage, stillbirth, neonatal death and termination of pregnancy). Planned subgroups included singletons and twins, and low-cervical or high-cervical suture. Pairwise random effects meta-analysis calculated in RevMan5.4, single arm random effects proportional meta-analysis calculated using RevMan and R studio. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and Joanna Briggs Institute checklists., Results: 6781 abstracts were screened, and 177 (four randomised controlled trials) studies included in the five analysis groups. Women receiving ECC were significantly less likely to experience pregnancy loss (combined RR 0.48 95 %CI 0.39-0.59 singleton RR 0.48 95 %CI 0.34-0.67 twin only RR 0.39 95 %CI 0.26-0.58) compared to expectant management. Adjuvant amnioreduction with ECC was not found to reduce pregnancy loss (RR 1.12 (95 % CI 0.73-1.72) or any other outcomes compared to ECC without amnioreduction. Women were significantly more likely to experience pregnancy loss (RR3.85 95 %CI 3.13-4.74) after ECC compared to planned cerclage. The probability of intra-operative rupture of membranes at ECC insertion was 3.3 % (95 %CI 1.8-5.1) and the probability of an ECC attempt being abandoned was 2.6 % (95 %CI 1.1-4.6 %)., Discussion: ECC appears to reduce the risk of pregnancy loss for both singletons and twins although the overall quality of evidence is poor. It is important that women are counselled regarding the outcomes following cerclage according to indication. Pregnancy complications are common after ECC although the rates of intra-operative complications are lower than may be anticipated. Randomised trials remain imperative for understanding the role of ECC and adjunctive treatments in preventing pregnancy loss in this condition., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To determine the effects of cerclage on twin pregnancies., Methods: A multicenter, retrospective, cohort study was conducted at 10 tertiary centers using a web-based data collection platform. The study population included twin pregnancies delivered after 20 weeks of gestation. Patients with one or two fetal deaths before 20 weeks of gestation were excluded. Maternal characteristics, including prenatal cervical length (CL) and obstetric outcomes, were retrieved from the electronic medical records., Results: A total of 1,473 patients had available data regarding the CL measured before 24 weeks of gestation. Seven patients without CL data obtained prior to cerclage were excluded from the analysis. The study population was divided into two groups according to the CL measured during the mid-trimester: the CL ≤2.5 cm group ( n  = 127) and the CL >2.5 cm group ( n  = 1,339). A total of 127 patients (8.7%) were included in the CL ≤2.5 cm group, including 41.7% (53/127) who received cerclage. Patients in the CL >2.5 cm group who received cerclage had significantly lower gestational age at delivery than the control group (hazard ratio (HR): 1.8; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.11-2.87; p  = .016). Patients in the CL ≤2.5 cm group who received cerclage had a significantly higher gestational age at delivery than the control group (HR: 0.5; 95% CI: 0.30-0.82; p value = .006)., Conclusions: In twin pregnancies with a CL ≤2.5 cm, cerclage significantly prolongs gestation. However, unnecessary cerclage in women with a CL >2.5 cm may result in a higher risk of preterm labor and histologic chorioamnionitis although this study has a limitation originated from retrospective design.

Background: Second trimester miscarriage and preterm birth is a significant global problem. Surgical cervical cerclage is performed to prevent pregnancy loss and preterm birth. It utilises either a monofilament or braided suture. It is hypothesised that a braided material becomes colonised with pathogenic bacteria that causes vaginal dysbiosis, infection and cerclage failure., Objectives: The primary objective of the study was to examine the effectiveness of using a monofilament suture material as opposed to a braided suture material on pregnancy loss in women requiring a vaginal cervical cerclage., Design: Superiority open randomised controlled trial., Setting: Seventy-five maternity sites across the UK., Participants: Women experiencing a singleton pregnancy requiring a cervical cerclage., Interventions: Monofilament suture or braided suture., Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was pregnancy loss (miscarriage and perinatal mortality, including any stillbirth or neonatal death in the first week of life). Secondary outcomes included the core outcome set for preterm birth., Methods: Women were randomised on a 1 : 1 basis to monofilament or braided cerclage utilising a bespoke randomisation service with minimisation dependent on the site, indication for cerclage, intention to use progesterone and planned surgical technique. The inclusion criteria were three or more previous mid-trimester losses or preterm births, insertion of a cerclage in a previous pregnancy, a history of a mid-trimester loss or preterm birth with a shortened cervical length in the current pregnancy or in women who clinicians deemed at risk of preterm birth. The exclusion criteria were an emergency or rescue cerclage, age of < 18 years, being unable to give informed consent or the cerclage having to be placed abdominally. The original sample size was calculated based on a relative risk reduction of 41% from a pregnancy loss rate of 19% in the braided group to 11% in the monofilament group with 90% power and alpha at p = 0.05. The independent data monitoring committee noted a lower-than-anticipated pooled event rate within the trial and recommended an increase in sample size to 2050. The outcome data were collected using clinical record forms from the maternal and neonatal medical records and reported to Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit., Results: A total of 2049 women were randomised, after withdrawals and loss to follow-up, data on 1005 women in the monofilament group and 993 women in the braided group were included. The baseline demographics between the groups were similar. There was no evidence of a difference in pregnancy loss rates between the monofilament and braided groups (80/1003 vs. 75/993; adjusted risk ratio: 1.05, 95% confidence interval: 0.79 to 1.40; adjusted risk difference: 0.002, 95% confidence interval: -0.02 to 0.03)., Limitations: The trial did not collect long-term paediatric outcomes. There were no safety concerns., Conclusions: There was no evidence of a difference in pregnancy loss between a monofilament suture and a braided suture., Future Work: Long-term follow-up of neonates born within the C-STICH (cerclage suture type for an insufficient cervix and its effects on health outcomes) trial., Trial Registration: This trial is registered as ISRCTN15373349., Funding: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 13/04/107) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment ; Vol. 28, No. 40. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

Background: Women with unfavorable obstetric history can benefit from prophylactic cerclage ("history indicated") which can be performed vaginally or transabdominally with laparoscopic techniques. The aim of our study is to evaluate the effectiveness in the prevention of preterm birth of the vaginal technique and of the minimally invasive laparoscopic technique in women with an unfavorable obstetric history., Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study examining elective cerclages performed in women with adverse obstetrics history. The primary outcome was rate of early preterm and second trimester deliveries while other outcomes analyzed were surgical complications, the time needed for cerclage procedures, live birth rate, gestational age at delivery, birth weight, Apgar score., Results: Data from 64 women were analyzed; among them, 14 underwent a laparoscopic procedure (22%) while 50 a vaginal cerclage (78%). The two groups were homogeneous in terms of demographic characteristics, but of course differed significantly in terms of obstetrics history, as well as for the surgical indications of cerclage procedures. The rate of early preterm deliveries and second trimester miscarriage were the same in the vaginal and laparoscopic group (8%), comparable to what was reported in literature. The operative time was longer in the laparoscopic group, but with similar duration of the hospital stay. We reported no intraoperative complications in both groups., Conclusions: As the laparoscopic procedure, usually reserved for women with a previous failed vaginal cerclage, has been proved to be equally safe and effective, it may could be proposed to a wider group of women. Prospective randomized studies are needed to provide new and conclusive data about this topic.

Purpose: Women diagnosed with mid-trimester cervical insufficiency and dilatation are offered interventions to salvage and support the cervix, where the mainstay of therapy is emergency cervical cerclage. However, considering the significant morbidity associated with delivery in the extreme prematurity period, some women may opt for pregnancy termination. In addition, it is expected that elective cerclage in a subsequent pregnancy may yield better obstetrical results. The objective of this study was, therefore, to compare the obstetrical outcomes of emergency cerclage versus elective cerclage., Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of the pregnancy outcomes of women with a singleton pregnancy who underwent cervical cerclage at our institution between December 2008 and November 2021. Women who underwent emergency cervical cerclage due to painless dilatation in the second trimester were compared with women who underwent elective cerclage., Results: Overall, 32 women who underwent emergency cerclage and 183 women who underwent elective cerclage were included. No cases of iatrogenic membrane rupture were noted during the cerclage procedure. There was no statistical difference between the emergency cerclage group and the elective cerclage group in the primary outcomes: gestational age at delivery (35.8 + 4.7 vs 36.3 + 4.9, p =  0.58, respectively), delivery in the extreme prematurity period (between 24 and 28 gestational weeks, 6.5% vs 2.3%, p = 0.21, respectively), and fetal or neonatal death (6.9% vs 6.3%,  p =  0.91, respectively)., Conclusion: Although there are much less favourable circumstances, emergency cerclage is a safe procedure with comparable obstetrical outcomes to elective cerclage. Patient selection and experienced medical team may play a significant role in those cases., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Cervical cerclage, cervical pessary, and vaginal progesterone have each been shown to reduce preterm birth (PTB) in high-risk women, but to our knowledge, there has been no randomised comparison of the 3 interventions. The SuPPoRT "Stitch, Pessary, or Progesterone Randomised Trial" was designed to compare the rate of PTB <37 weeks between each intervention in women who develop a short cervix in pregnancy., Methods and Findings: SuPPoRT was a multicentre, open label 3-arm randomised controlled trial designed to demonstrate equivalence (equivalence margin 20%) conducted from 1 July 2015 to 1 July 2021 in 19 obstetric units in the United Kingdom. Asymptomatic women with singleton pregnancies with transvaginal ultrasound cervical lengths measuring <25 mm between 14+0 and 23+6 weeks' gestation were eligible for randomisation (1:1:1) to receive either vaginal cervical cerclage (n = 128), cervical pessary (n = 126), or vaginal progesterone (n = 132). Minimisation variables were gestation at recruitment, body mass index (BMI), and risk factor for PTB. The primary outcome was PTB <37 weeks' gestation. Secondary outcomes included PTB <34 weeks', <30 weeks', and adverse perinatal outcome. Analysis was by intention to treat. A total of 386 pregnant women between 14+0 and 23+6 weeks' gestation with a cervical length <25 mm were randomised to one of the 3 interventions. Of these women, 67% were of white ethnicity, 18% black ethnicity, and 7.5% Asian ethnicity. Mean BMI was 25.6. Over 85% of women had prior risk factors for PTB; 39.1% had experienced a spontaneous PTB or midtrimester loss (>14 weeks gestation); and 45.8% had prior cervical surgery. Data from 381 women were available for outcome analysis. Using binary regression, randomised therapies (cerclage versus pessary versus vaginal progesterone) were found to have similar effects on the primary outcome PTB <37 weeks (39/127 versus 38/122 versus 32/132, p = 0.4, cerclage versus pessary risk difference (RD) -0.7% [-12.1 to 10.7], cerclage versus progesterone RD 6.2% [-5.0 to 17.0], and progesterone versus pessary RD -6.9% [-17.9 to 4.1]). Similarly, no difference was seen for PTB <34 and 30 weeks, nor adverse perinatal outcome. There were some differences in the mild side effect profile between interventions (vaginal discharge and bleeding) and women randomised to progesterone reported more severe abdominal pain. A small proportion of women did not receive the intervention as per protocol; however, per-protocol and as-treated analyses showed similar results. The main study limitation was that the trial was underpowered for neonatal outcomes and was stopped early due to the COVID-19 pandemic., Conclusions: In this study, we found that for women who develop a short cervix, cerclage, pessary, and vaginal progesterone were equally efficacious at preventing PTB, as judged with a 20% equivalence margin. Commencing with any of the therapies would be reasonable clinical management. These results can be used as a counselling tool for clinicians when managing women with a short cervix., Trial Registration: EU Clinical Trials register. EudraCT Number: 2015-000456-15, clinicaltrialsregister.eu., ISRCTN Registry: ISRCTN13364447, isrctn.com., Competing Interests: AS is a member of PLOS Medicine’s editorial board. The authors have declared that no other competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2024 Hezelgrave et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Preterm birth is the leading cause of perinatal and neonatal morbidity and mortality in the developed world. An important cause of preterm birth is cervical insufficiency, leading to membrane prolapse, premature rupture of membranes, and mid-trimester pregnancy loss. A cerclage can be placed vaginally or abdominally to treat cervical insufficiency. In cases of failed prior transvaginal cerclage (TVC), transabdominal cerclage (TAC) is the alternative. The procedure can be completed via laparoscopy or open approach. The suture is placed at the internal os giving greater structural support.1 In this article, we review the definition of cervical incompetence, we present the indications for TAC, we discuss the outcomes of minimally invasive TAC compared to open approach, and we review surgical tips and tricks for robotic assisted (RA) TAC placement that can be used prior to pregnancy or in early gestation. The included images delineate the surgical technique for safe placement of robotic assisted laparoscopic abdominal cerclage in the management of cervical insufficiency.

Objective: Preterm birth (PTB) is the leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality worldwide, and cervical incompetence (CIC) is a significant contribution. Cervical cerclage (CC) is an effective obstetric intervention. However, many clinical factors affect the success rate of surgery. The objective was to investigate and compare the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of patients who underwent ultrasound- and physical examination-indicated cervical cerclage and to explore the influencing factors of preterm delivery before 34 weeks., Methods: The sociodemographic characteristics and clinical data of patients with a diagnosis of cervical incompetence who underwent ultrasound- and physical examination-indicated transvaginal cervical cerclage at Nanjing Maternal and Child Health Hospital from January 2020 to December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of the patients were evaluated. Continuous variables were compared using Student's t test (for normally distributed data) or the Mann-Whitney U test (for nonnormally distributed data). Categorical variables were analysed using the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. Additionally, logistic regression analyses and receiver operating characteristic curves were used to evaluate the associations of inflammatory markers with maternal and neonatal outcomes., Results: This study included 141 participants who underwent cervical cerclage, including 71 with ultrasound-indicated cerclage and 70 with physical examination-indicated cerclage. Compared to those in the ultrasound-indicated cerclage group, the duration from cerclage to delivery, birth weight, and APGAR score in the physical examination-indicated cerclage group were significantly lower, and the rates of delivery at < 28 weeks, < 32 weeks, < 34 weeks, and < 37 weeks of gestation and neonatal mortality were significantly higher (all P < 0.05). Compared to those in the physical ultrasound-indicated cerclage group, in the physical examination-indicated cerclage group, maternal blood inflammatory markers, such as C-reactive protein (CRP), the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) and the systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) were significantly higher (P < 0.05). Additionally, maternal blood inflammatory markers, such as the CRP, white blood cell count, platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), SII, and SIRI were significantly higher in the group with delivery before 34 weeks of gestation. Furthermore, the results demonstrated that twin pregnancy had the highest OR for preterm delivery before 34 weeks of gestation (OR = 3.829; 95% CI 1.413-10.373; P = 0.008), as well as the following: the SII level (OR = 1.001; 95% CI 1.000-1.002; P = 0.003) and CRP level (OR = 1.083; 95% CI 1.038-1.131; P = 0.022). The risk factors for preterm delivery before 34 weeks of gestation were twin gestation, an increased SII level and an increased CRP level, which had good combined predictive value., Conclusion: In patients with cervical insufficiency, ultrasound-indicated cervical cerclage appears to lead to better pregnancy outcomes than physical examination-indicated cerclage. Twin pregnancy and maternal blood inflammatory markers, such as the CRP level and the SII, are associated with preterm delivery before 34 weeks of gestation., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Both progestogens and cerclage are individually effective in preterm birth prevention in high risk pregnancies. However, national and international guidelines cite a lack of data available to comment on the potential benefit of concurrent progestogen therapy after cerclage has been placed. Studies to date have been small with mixed results regarding benefit of concurrent progestogen with cerclage leaving uncertainty regarding best clinical practice., Objective: This study aimed to evaluate whether cerclage with progestogen therapy was superior to cerclage alone in the prevention of spontaneous preterm birth in singleton pregnancies., Methods: This is an international retrospective cohort study of singleton pregnancies, without major anomaly or aneuploidy, and with cerclage placed at 10 different institutions in the United States and Colombia from June 2016 to June 2020. Exclusion criteria were lack of documentation regarding whether progestogen was prescribed, unavailable delivery outcome, and pregnancy termination (spontaneous or induced) before 16 weeks' gestation. The exposure of interest was progestogen use with cerclage placement, which included those who continued to use progestogen or who started progestogen after cerclage. The comparison group consisted of those without progestogen use after cerclage placement, which included those who had no progestogen use during the entire pregnancy or who initiated progestogen and then stopped it after cerclage placement. Progestogen type, cerclage indication, maternal baseline characteristics, and maternal/neonatal outcomes were collected. The primary outcome was spontaneous preterm birth at <37 weeks. The secondary outcomes were spontaneous preterm birth at <34 weeks, gestational age at delivery, and a composite neonatal outcome including ≥1 of the following: perinatal mortality, confirmed sepsis, grade III or IV intraventricular hemorrhage, retinopathy of prematurity, respiratory distress syndrome, and bronchopulmonary dysplasia. There were planned subgroup analyses by cerclage indication, progestogen type (vaginal progesterone vs 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate), preterm birth history, and site. Continuous variables were compared in adjusted analyses with analysis of covariance, and categorical variables were compared with multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for potential confounders with adjusted odds ratio. A Cox regression survival curve was generated to compare latency to spontaneous delivery, censored after 37 weeks., Results: During the study period, a total of 699 singletons met the inclusion criteria: 561 in the progestogen with cerclage group and 138 with cerclage alone. Baseline characteristics were similar, except the higher likelihood of previous spontaneous preterm birth in the progestogen group (61% vs 41%; P<.001). Within the progestogen group, 52% were on 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate weekly, 44% on vaginal progesterone daily, and 3% on oral progesterone daily. Progestogen with cerclage was associated with a significantly lower frequency of spontaneous preterm birth <37 weeks (31% vs 39%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.59 [0.39-0.89]; P=.01) and <34 weeks (19% vs 27%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.55 [0.35-0.87]; P=.01), increased latency to spontaneous delivery (hazard ratio for spontaneous preterm birth <37 weeks, 0.66 [0.49-0.90]; P=.009), and lower frequency of perinatal death (7% vs 16%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.37 [0.20-0.67]; P=.001). In planned subgroup analyses, association with reduced odds of preterm birth <37 weeks persisted in those on vaginal progesterone, those without a previous preterm birth, those with ultrasound- or examination-indicated cerclage, those who started progestogen therapy before cerclage, and in sites restricted to the United States., Conclusion: Use of progestogen with cerclage was associated with reduced rates of spontaneous preterm birth and early spontaneous preterm birth compared with cerclage alone. Although this study was not sufficiently powered for subgroup analysis, the strength of evidence for benefit appeared greatest for those with ultrasound- or examination-indicated cerclage, and with vaginal progesterone. El resumen está disponible en Español al final del artículo., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Recurrent pregnancy loss devastates parents and frustrates doctors, especially when the pregnancy progresses to the second trimester. Cervical insufficiency is the most common cause of second-trimester pregnancy loss. Abdominal cerclage is the treatment option for women with failed vaginally applied cervical cerclage. We report a 33-year-old para 0 with a history of nine second-trimester pregnancy losses. She had six failed transvaginal cerclages using McDonald's procedure. A vaginal double cervical cerclage was placed in her index pregnancy. Two mersilene tape purse-string sutures were placed in the submucosal layer of the cervix; the first 1cm below and the second at the level of the internal os. Both sutures were knotted at the 12 O'Clock position on the cervix. She carried her pregnancy to almost term and delivered a healthy baby girl weighing 2.5kg. We recommend a transvaginal double cervical cerclage with mersilene tape using a modified McDonald's technique as a viable alternative to abdominal cervical cerclage. (Afr J Reprod Health 2024; 28 [6]: 117-125)., Competing Interests: The Authors declared no conflict of interest, (African Journal of Reproductive Health © 2024.)

Objectives: We aimed to perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis to evaluate the preventive strategies for preterm birth in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome., Methods: PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Central were searched from inception to December 2023 with no filters. Additionally, the reference lists of the included studies were manually examined to identify any supplementary studies. We selected randomized controlled trials and cohorts comparing interventions to prevent preterm birth in twin pregnancies complicated by twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. A random-effects frequentist network meta-analysis was performed using RStudio version 4.3.1. Randomized controlled trials and cohorts were assessed respectively using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of interventions tool and Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials., Results: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we included eight studies comprising a total of 719 patients. Compared with expectant management, cerclage stood out as the only intervention associated with an increase in the survival of at least one twin (risk ratio 1.12; 95 % confidence interval 1.01-1.23). Our subgroup analysis based on different thresholds for short cervix demonstrated a significant reduction in the risk of preterm birth before 32 weeks with ultrasound-indicated cerclage using a 15 mm criterion (risk ratio 0.65; 95 % confidence interval 0.47-0.92)., Conclusions: Our study suggests the potential benefit of cerclage as a preventive strategy for preterm birth in pregnancies complicated by twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. These findings highlight the necessity for further investigation to corroborate our results and address the optimal threshold for ultrasound-indicated cerclage., (© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of cervical cerclage with spontaneous follow-up strategy on pregnancy duration and neonatal outcomes in women with visible or prolapsed fetal membranes., Methods: Patients who were referred to a single tertiary care centre between 1st January 2017 and 31st December 2022 were included in this comparative, retrospective cohort study. Patients were divided into two groups, those undergoing cerclage and those followed with no-cerclage. The range of pregnancy weeks for cerclage is between 18th and 27+6 weeks., Results: A total of 106 cases were reviewed and nine were excluded. Based on shared decision making, cervical cerclage was performed in 76 patients (78.3 %) and 21 patients (21.6 %) were medically treated in no-cerclage group if there was no early rupture of the fetal membranes. The gestational age at delivery was 29.8 ± 6 [median=30 (19-38)] weeks in the cerclage group and 25.8 ± 2.9 [median=25 (19-32)] weeks in the no-cerclage group (p=0.004). Pregnancy prolongation was significantly longer in the cerclage group compared to the no-cerclage group (55 ± 48.6 days [median=28 (3-138)] vs. 12 ± 17.9 days [median=9 (1-52)]; p<0.001). Take home baby rate was 58/76 (76.3 %) in cerclage group vs. 8/21 (38 %) in no-cerclage group. In the post-24 week cerclage group the absolute risk reduction for pregnancy loss was 50 % (95 % CI=21.7-78.2)., Conclusions: Cervical cerclage applied before and after 24 weeks (until 27+6 weeks) increased take home baby rate in women with visible or prolapsed fetal membranes without increasing adverse maternal outcome when compared with no-cerclage group., (© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.)

Introduction: Twin pregnancies have a high risk of extreme preterm birth (PTB) at less than 28 weeks of gestation, which is associated with increased risk of neonatal morbidity and mortality. Currently there is a lack of effective treatments for women with a twin pregnancy and a short cervix or cervical dilatation. A possible effective surgical method to reduce extreme PTB in twin pregnancies with an asymptomatic short cervix or dilatation at midpregnancy is the placement of a vaginal cerclage., Methods and Analysis: We designed two multicentre randomised trials involving eight hospitals in the Netherlands (sites in other countries may be added at a later date). Women older than 16 years with a twin pregnancy at <24 weeks of gestation and an asymptomatic short cervix of ≤25 mm or cervical dilatation will be randomly allocated (1:1) to both trials on vaginal cerclage and standard treatment according to the current Dutch Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecology guideline (no cerclage). Permuted blocks sized 2 and 4 will be used to minimise the risk of disbalance. The primary outcome measure is PTB of <28 weeks. Analyses will be by intention to treat. The first trial is to demonstrate a risk reduction from 25% to 10% in the short cervix group, for which 194 patients need to be recruited. The second trial is to demonstrate a risk reduction from 80% to 35% in the dilatation group and will recruit 44 women. A cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed from a societal perspective., Ethics and Dissemination: This study has been approved by the Research Ethics Committees in the Netherlands on 3/30/2023. Participants will be required to sign an informed consent form. The results will be presented at conferences and published in a peer-reviewed journal. Participants will be informed about the results., Trial Registration Number: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05968794., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Aim: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the oral probiotic effect on pregnancy outcomes in pregnant women undergoing cerclage compared to placebo., Methods: This study was a double-blind randomized clinical trial undertaken in Yasuj, Iran. 114 eligible participants who have undergone cerclage were randomly divided to either receive probiotic adjuvant or 17α-OHP (250 mg, IM) with placebo from the 16th -37th week of pregnancy by "block" randomization method. Our primary outcomes were preterm labor (PTB) (late and early) and secondary outcomes were other obstetrical and neonatal outcomes included preterm pre-labor rupture of membranes (PPROM), pre-labor rupture of membranes (PROM), mode of delivery, and neonatal outcomes including anthropometric characterize and Apgar score (one and fifth-minute)., Results: Results show that there are no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of PTB in < 34th (15.51% vs. 17.86%; P = 0.73) and 34-37th weeks of pregnancy (8.7% vs. 16.1%; P = 0.22), and mode of delivery (P = 0.09). PPROM (8.7% vs. 28.5%; P = 0.006) PROM (10.3% vs. 25%; P = 0.04) was significantly lower in patients receiving probiotic adjuvant compared to the control group. After delivery, the findings of the present study showed that there were no significant differences in newborn's weight (3082.46 ± 521.8vs. 2983.89 ± 623.89), head circumstance (36.86 ± 1.53vs. 36.574 ± 1.52), height (45.4 ± 5.34 vs. 47.33 ± 4.92) and Apgar score in one (0.89 ± 0.03 vs. 0.88 ± 0.05) and five minutes (0.99 ± 0.03vs. 0.99 ± 0.03) after birth., Conclusion: Our result has shown that the consumption of Lactofem probiotic from the 16th week until 37th of pregnancy can lead to a reduction of complications such as PPROM and PROM., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Competing Interests: Declaration of Interests A.Y. has nothing to disclose. E.H.F. has nothing to disclose. E.G.R. has nothing to disclose.

Background: The treatment for cervical insufficiency is cerclage surgery. Although cerclage is a common therapy for prevention of preterm birth, there is no consensus about its mechanism of efficacy. Previous investigators have hypothesized that cerclage prevents preterm birth by improving the cervical barrier to ascending infection. However, this hypothesis is difficult to study in human pregnancy., Objective: In a mouse model of ascending infection, we hypothesized that a cerclage improves the cervical barrier leading to decreased ascending intrauterine infection and inflammation. An abdominal cerclage was studied because a vaginal cerclage is not feasible in mice., Study Design: To perform an abdominal cerclage, laparotomy was performed on timed, pregnant C57BL/6 mice on gestational day 10 (E10). A 6-0 silk suture was placed around the cervix just below the junction of the 2 uterine horns. Sham controls received the same surgery, but no cerclage was placed. To track ascending infection nonpathogenic E coli K12 was genetically modified to express bioluminescence. On E15, bioluminescent E coli K12 (20 μL of 1×10 9 bacteria) was inoculated into the vagina. Whole-body bioluminescence imaging was performed 0.5 hours and 24 hours after inoculation. To assess intrauterine inflammation, pathogenic E coli K1 was used. On E15, bacterial inoculums of E coli K1 (20 μL of 1×10 4 bacteria) were vaginally administered. Samples of uterus, placenta, and fetal membranes were collected 24 hours after inoculation. Gene expression of inflammation-related proteins was compared between 3 groups: (1) sham control surgery + inoculation of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), (2) sham control surgery + inoculation of E coli K1, and (3) cerclage surgery + inoculation of E coli K1., Results: Abdominal cerclage was well tolerated. No cases of preterm birth were seen following abdominal cerclage. Whole-body bioluminescent imaging performed 0.5 hours post inoculation showed a strong luminescence signal in the vaginal region of mice in both control and experimental groups indicating successful bacteria inoculation. Twenty-four hours after inoculation, bioluminescent signal was seen ascending into the uterine horns in all control mice. However, in mice with abdominal cerclages, no bioluminescent signal was seen after 24 hours. When the reproductive tissues were imaged separately in control mice, strong bioluminescence signal was detected in the placenta, fetal membranes, and uterus. Gene expression studies showed that cerclage significantly decreased the expression of inflammatory proteins induced by E coli K1 in the uterus, placenta, and fetal membranes., Conclusion: In this mouse model of ascending intrauterine infection, abdominal cerclage prevented ascending infection of E coli. In addition, abdominal cerclage prevented expression of inflammatory cytokines in the uterus, placenta, and membranes of mice. The study provides evidence for a potential mechanism of cerclage success in human pregnancy., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Transabdominal cerclage is an effective surgical intervention for preterm birth prevention. Placement of cervical sutures using a port closure device for prepregnancy laparoscopic abdominal cerclage has been used at our unit in recent years. We report the operative and pregnancy outcomes for prepregnancy laparoscopic abdominal cerclage using the port closure device and compare it with the outcomes of the traditional approach. For prepregnancy laparoscopic transabdominal cerclage (n=52), the port closure device approach was associated with less blood loss during surgery (0.95±4.4 mL vs 5.4±15.7 mL; P=.007) and a shorter hospital length of stay (0.0; 0.0-0.0 days vs 1.0; 0.0-1.0 days; P<.001). There were also trends toward shorter operating times (41.4±15.3 minutes vs 50.1±18.0 minutes; P=.167) and lower perioperative complication rates (0.0%; 0/21 vs 16.1%; 5/31; P=.065) when compared with the traditional technique. There was no significant difference between the port closure device technique and the traditional approach in the rate of preterm birth in a subsequent pregnancy (0.0%; 0/9 vs 22.6%; 7/39; P=.248). Use of the port closure device for suture placement during prepregnancy laparoscopic cerclage for preterm birth prevention was reported. This technique was associated with less blood loss and a shorter hospital length of stay, had trends toward shorter operating times and lower perioperative complication rates, and had similar rates of preterm birth., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: This study aimed to ascertain the outcomes associated with a cervical cerclage among individuals with a history of previable prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM)., Study Design: This study was a retrospective cohort study conducted at a single tertiary center between 2011 and 2021. We included individuals with a history of previable (before 24 weeks) PROM and the subsequent viable pregnancy. Women with multifetal gestation, preterm birth (PTB) or cerclage in previous gestation, or abdominal cerclage after trachelectomy were excluded. Primary outcome was PTB rate (delivery <37 weeks). Recurrence of preterm PROM and adverse composite maternal and neonatal outcomes (CMO and CNO) were evaluated as secondary outcomes. CMO included any of the following: suspected chorioamnionitis, endometritis, red blood cell transfusion, uterine rupture, unplanned hysterectomy, or death. CNO included any of the following: previable PTB (<24 weeks of gestation), bronchopulmonary dysplasia, grade 3 or 4 intraventricular hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, mechanical ventilation, seizures, hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, or death., Results: During the study period, 118 individuals had a history of previable PROM and a documented subsequent pregnancy, out of which 74 (62.7%) met inclusion criteria. Nineteen (25.7%) of eligible individuals underwent a cerclage for prior previable PROM and were compared with controls ( n  = 55, 74.3%). Women who underwent a cerclage had higher rates of PTB < 37 weeks (63.2 vs. 10.9%, p  < 0.001; odds ratio [OR]: 14.00, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.97-49.35) and < 34 weeks (21.1 vs. 3.6%, p  = 0.03; OR: 7.07, 95% CI: 1.18-42.39) compared with those without cerclage. Furthermore, recurrent preterm PROM and previable PTB rates were higher among patients who underwent cerclage. The survival curve further indicated that individuals with cerclage delivered earlier. CMO and CNO rates were similar in those with and without cerclage., Conclusion: Cerclage placement in individuals with prior previable PROM was associated with higher rates of recurrent preterm PROM and PTB., Key Points: · The management of individuals in a subsequent pregnancy following previable PROM is a conundrum.. · Cerclage following previable PROM is associated with higher rates of recurrent preterm PROM and PTB.. · Composite maternal and neonatal outcome rates were similar in those with and without cerclage.., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To demonstrate the surgical techniques for improving safety in robotic-assisted abdominal cerclage in patients with bicornuate uteri complicated by recurrent pregnancy loss and cervical insufficiency., Design: Stepwise demonstration with narrated video footage., Setting: An academic tertiary care hospital., Patients: Our patient is a 22-year-old G2P0020 with a history of recurrent pregnancy loss. During her first pregnancy, she was asymptomatic until 19 weeks and delivered because of a preterm premature rupture of membranes. A transvaginal cerclage was performed for her second pregnancy at 14 weeks, which ended at 16 weeks because of preterm premature rupture of membranes. The final magnetic resonance imaging report noted a "bicorporeal uterus with duplication of the uterine body, resulting in two markedly divergent uterine horns that are fused at the isthmus... unlike a typical didelphic uterus, a single, non septated cervix is noted, which shows normal appearances, measuring 3.8 cm in length." Given her history of a uterine anomaly and recurrent pregnancy loss in the absence of other biochemical factors, her maternal-fetal medicine specialist referred her to us as the patient strongly desired future viable pregnancies. The patient was counseled on multiple alternatives, including different methods of performing the cerclage, and ultimately decided on the robotic-assisted (Da Vinci Xi) prophylactic abdominal cerclage., Interventions: The bicornuate uterus is a rare class IV mullerian duct anomaly caused by the impaired fusion of the mullerian ducts in the uterus, classically appearing in imaging studies as a heart-shaped uterus. This patient demographic reports a high incidence of obstetric complications. Pregnancy in such a uterus causes complications like first- and second-trimester pregnancy loss, preterm labor, low-birthweight infants, and malpresentation at delivery. 1 Researchers have postulated that there is an abnormal ratio of muscle fibers to connective tissue in a congenitally abnormal cervix. During pregnancy, an inadequate uterine volume may lead to increased intrauterine pressure and stress on the lower uterine segment, which can lead to cervical incompetence. 2 To address cervical incompetence, cervical cerclages are a commonly utilized procedure, as recent studies demonstrate that the incidence of term pregnancies in the group with documented cervical incompetence treated with cerclage placement increased from 26% to 63%. 3 One observational study noted improved obstetrical outcomes occurred with interval placement, a cerclage placed in between pregnancies in the nongravid uterus, compared with cerclage placement between 9 and 10 weeks gestation, with the mean gestational age for delivery at 32.9 weeks and 34.5 weeks when a cerclage was placed in gravid and nongravid women, respectively. 4 In addition, another retrospective study was done, which demonstrated a lower incidence of neonatal death with prophylactic cerclages. 5 Operating on a nonpregnant uterus offers several benefits, including its reduced size, fewer and smaller blood vessels, and simplified handling. Moreover, there are clearly no concerns regarding the fetus. In the decision to use a robotic-assisted platform vs. laparoscopic, a systematic review showed the rates of third-trimester delivery and live birth (LB) using laparoscopy during pregnancy were found to be 70% and 70%-100%, respectively. The same review demonstrated slightly improved outcomes via the robotic route regarding gestational age at delivery (median, 37 weeks), rates of LB (90%), and third-trimester delivery (90%). 6 Additional factors contributing to the preference for robotics in surgical procedures include incorporating advanced tools, which can enhance the robotic system's advantages compared with traditional laparoscopy. An invaluable tool in this context is the simultaneous utilization of Firefly mode, which employs a near-infrared camera system, achieved through injecting indocyanine green dye or integrating other light sources concurrently. The intravenous administration of indocyanine green is acknowledged widely for its safety and efficacy as a contrast agent in the evaluation of microvascular circulation and organ vascularization. This property equips surgeons with heightened precision when guiding the needle, proving especially advantageous when faced with challenges in visualizing vascular anatomy. In our specific case, we harnessed the capabilities of Firefly mode in conjunction with hysteroscopic light, enabling us to vividly illustrate the contours of a bicornuate uterus from both external and internal perspectives. We demonstrate a simplified technique of the abdominal cerclage, one cerclage around the internal cervical os of the uterus, using a robotic-assisted platform in a nongravid patient. The surgery began with the eversion of the umbilicus, and a 15-mm skin incision was made in the umbilicus. A Gelpoint mini advanced access site laparoscopy device was inserted into the incision, and CO 2 was allowed to insufflate the abdominal cavity with careful attention given to intraabdominal pressure. Once the DaVinci was docked, the surgeon began the creation of a bladder flap. The bladder was carefully dissected from the lower uterine segment and both uteri using monopolar scissors. The anatomical differences of a bicornuate uterus prompted the surgeon to dissect a wider circumference for safety reasons, where a wider dissection offers a better view of the uterine vessels and ease of introducing the Mersilene tape later on. Bilateral uterine vessels were further skeletonized and exposed anteriorly using blunt dissection and monopolar scissors. After further dissection and lateralization, the final result creates a landmark medial to the right uterine vessels at the level of the internal cervical os with which the needle of the Mersilene tape will be able to pass through. The Mersilene tape was guided from anterior to posterior via a previously straightened needle. Similarly, a landmark was created on the left, and the Mersilene tape was directed from anterior to posterior. The Mersilene tape was placed circumferentially around the internal cervical os of the bicornuate uterus, medial to the uterine vessels. Both ends of the Mersilene tape were then gently pulled, ensuring that the tape was lying flat on the anterior of the internal cervical os with no bowels or uterine vessels within it. The tape was then tied posteriorly at the 6 o'clock position with appropriate tension. A 2-0 silk was then sutured to the tails of the tape using the purse-string technique to ensure that it would remain securely tied and in the correct position. Hemostasis was assured. Both a hysteroscopy and a cystoscopy were done after the completion of the cerclage to ensure that no tape or sutures were seen within the cervical canal or the uterine cavity. None were observed., Main Outcomes Measures: The success criteria for the surgery were identified as the patient's ability to attain a viable pregnancy after the cerclage placement, along with achieving LB., Results: Subsequently, a spontaneous pregnancy was achieved. An infant weighing 3 pounds and 16 ounces was delivered by cesarean section at 36 weeks because of an oligohydramnios. The infant is currently healthy at 13 pounds., Conclusion: Robotic-assisted abdominal cerclage around the internal cervical os in a bicornuate uterus offers a possibly feasible and straightforward technique for surgeons seeking to reduce risks, although further research is needed., (Copyright © 2024 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Emergency cervical cerclage is a recognized method for preventing mid-trimester pregnancy loss and premature birth; however, its benefits remain controversial. This study aimed to establish preoperative models predicting preterm birth and gestational latency following emergency cervical cerclage in singleton pregnant patients with a high risk of preterm birth., Material and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data from patients who received emergency cerclage between 2015 and 2023 in three institutions. Patients were grouped into a derivation cohort (n = 141) and an independent validation cohort (n = 61). Univariate and multivariate logistic and Cox regression analyses were used to identify independent predictive variables and establish the models. Harrell's C-index, time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves and areas under the curves, calibration curve, and decision curve analyses were performed to assess the models., Results: The models incorporated gestational weeks at cerclage placement, history of prior second-trimester loss and/or preterm birth, cervical dilation, and preoperative C-reactive protein level. The C-index of the model for predicting preterm birth before 28 weeks was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.82-0.93) in the derivation cohort and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.71-0.92) in the independent validation cohort; The C-index of the model for predicting gestational latency was 0.70 (95% CI: 0.66-0.75) and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.71-0.84), respectively. In the derivation set, the areas under the curves were 0.84, 0.81, and 0.84 for predicting 1-, 3- and 5-week pregnancy prolongation, respectively. The corresponding values for the external validation were 0.78, 0.78, and 0.79, respectively. Calibration curves showed a good homogeneity between the observed and predicted ongoing pregnant probabilities. Decision curve analyses revealed satisfactory clinical usefulness., Conclusions: These novel models provide reliable and valuable prognostic predictions for patients undergoing emergency cerclage. The models can assist clinicians and patients in making personalized clinical decisions before opting for the cervical cerclage., (© 2023 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG).)

Background: The protocol for delayed-interval delivery of the second twin in twin pregnancies has not been standardized. Cervical cerclage is often performed, but its use is debated. To conduct a scoping review on cervical cerclage for prolonging the intertwin delivery interval and improving second twin survival and maternal outcomes after preterm delivery or spontaneous abortion of the first twin in twin pregnancies., Methods: Seven Chinese and English language databases were searched from inception to March 1, 2023, including PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang Data, VIP Chinese Science Journal Database, and Sinomed. Relevant observational studies that assessed the effectiveness of the use of cervical cerclage in delayed-interval delivery of twins were screened and selected, and raw data were extracted, and descriptive statistics and chi-square analysis were performed., Results: A total of 102 articles were retrieved. After screening and exclusion of duplicate and irrelevant articles, 22 articles meeting the inclusion criteria were obtained. Studies in which cerclage was performed reported longer intertwin delivery intervals than those that did not perform cerclage, and the difference was statistically significant. The cerclage group also tended to have lower rates of chorioamnionitis and maternal complications, but the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant., Conclusion: After excluding patients with contraindications, emergency cervical cerclage can be considered in cases of spontaneous abortion of the first twin in twin pregnancies to prolong the gestation and improve the prognosis of the remaining fetus until it becomes viable and increases its birth weight., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objectives: To determine whether reinforcing cerclage following ultrasound evidence of cerclage failure before 24 weeks is an effective method to delay gestational age at delivery, and to decrease the rate of preterm and peri-viable delivery., Methods: A retrospective review was conducted for all patients who underwent any cervical cerclage procedure at a single tertiary care centre in Toronto, Canada between 1 December 2007 and 31 December 2017., Results: Of 1482 cerclage procedures completed during the study period, 40 pregnant persons who underwent reinforcing cerclage were compared with 40 pregnant persons who were found to have cerclage failure before 24 weeks but were managed expectantly. After adjusting for the shortest cervical length measured prior to 24 weeks, there was no significant difference between the reinforcing cerclage and control group for gestational age at delivery, preterm, or peri-viable birth (P = 0.52, P = 0.54, P = 0.74, respectively). In an unadjusted model, there was a statistically significant increase in placental infection identified on postpartum placenta pathology in the reinforcing cerclage group compared with the expectant management group, 92.9% compared with 66.7% (P = 0.028)., Conclusion: Reinforcing cerclage is unlikely to successfully delay the gestational age at delivery and reduce rates of preterm and pre-viable birth, especially if irreversible and progressive cervical change has begun. Future work should examine the role of preoperative amniocentesis to explore the impact of pre-existing intra-amniotic infection and reinforcing cerclage success., (Copyright © 2023 The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada/La Société des obstétriciens et gynécologues du Canada. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This retrospective cohort study aimed to assess the efficacy of emergency cervical cerclage (ECC) performed with the combined McDonald-Shirodkar technique in twin pregnancies between 18 and 26 weeks of pregnancy with painless cervical dilation 1 to 6 cm., Methods: A retrospective cohort study matched with the degree of cervical dilation was conducted. The study group (case group) included women with twin pregnancies undergoing combined McDonald-Shirodkar approach with cervical dilation ≥1 cm between 18 to 26 weeks of gestation at four institutions, from December 2015 to December 2022. To minimize confounding factors, we elucidated the causality structure using a directed acyclic graph and performed 1:1 case-control matching. A control group underwent the McDonald approach. The primary outcome was gestational age (GA) at delivery. The secondary outcomes were pregnancy latency; the rates of spontaneous preterm birth at <28, <30, <32, and <34 weeks; and neonatal outcomes. Additional subanalysis was performed by dividing the patients into two subgroups of women with cervical dilation ≥3 cm and <3 cm., Results: A total of 84 twin pregnancies were managed with either the combined McDonald-Shirodkar approach (case group: n = 42) or the McDonald approach (control group: n = 42). Demographic characteristics were not significantly different in the two groups (P > 0.05). After adjusting for confounders that were represented by a directed acyclic graph, median GA at delivery was significantly higher (30.5 vs 27 weeks; Bate: 3.40 [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.13-4.67], P < 0.001) and median pregnancy latency was significantly longer (56 vs 28 days; Bate: 24.04 [95% CI, 13.31-34.78], P < 0.001) in the case group compared with the control group. Rates of spontaneous preterm birth at <28, <30, <32, and <34 weeks were significantly lower in the case group than in the control group. For neonatal outcomes, there was higher birth weight (1543.75 vs 980 g; Bate: 420.08 [95% CI, 192.18-647.98], P < 0.001) and significantly lower overall perinatal mortality (7.1% vs 31%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.16 [95% CI, 0.04-0.70], P = 0.014) in the case group compared with the control group. When cervical dilation was ≥3 cm, the combined McDonald-Shirodkar procedure can significantly reduce perinatal mortality (8.3% vs 46.7%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.09 [95% CI, 0.01-0.77], P = 0.028), significantly decrease the risk of delivery at <28 and <30 weeks, and prolong GA at delivery and pregnancy latency compared with the McDonald procedure., Conclusions: ECC performed with the combined McDonald-Shirodkar procedure in women with twin pregnancies who have cervical dilation 1 to 6 cm in midtrimester pregnancy may reduce the rate of spontaneous preterm birth and improve perinatal and neonatal outcomes compared with the McDonald procedure, especially for twin pregnancies in women with cervical dilation of 3 to 6 cm and prolapsed membranes., (© 2023 The Authors. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.)

Objective: To analyze the effectiveness of cerclage in twin pregnancies with a short cervix., Study Design: Retrospective cohort study performed in two University Institutions in Valencia (Spain) with two different protocols for the management of asymptomatic dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies with mid-trimester cervical length ≤ 25 mm: treatment with indomethacin, antibiotics and cerclage (cerclage group) (N = 43) versus expectant management (control group) (N = 37)., Results: The initial cervical length was similar in both groups but detection of a short cervix was performed earlier in the cerclage group (21.6 vs 24.1 weeks, p < 0.001). Women with cerclage had a greater pregnancy latency (12.5 vs. 7.7 weeks, p < 0.001); higher gestational age at delivery (34.1 vs. 31.8 weeks, p < 0.04); less spontaneous preterm birth (SPB) < 28 weeks (11.6 % vs 37.8 %, p < 0.009); higher birthweight (2145 vs 1733 g, p < 0.001); lower birthweight < 1500 g (12.5 % vs 40.0 %, p < 0.001); less admissions to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) (24.1 % vs 43.3 %, p < 0.03); shorter stay at NICU (25.6 vs 49.4 days, p < 0.02); lower respiratory distress requiring mechanical ventilation (14.9 % vs 36.5 %, p < 0.02); fewer patent ductus arteriosus (8.9 % vs 26.9 %, p < 0.008); and lower composite adverse neonatal outcome (26.6 % vs. 44.8 %, p < 0.03). Cerclage and gestational age at diagnosis were the only independent predictors of SPB < 32 and < 28 weeks by multivariate analysis. The cumulative data in the literature show promising beneficial effects of cerclage., Conclusion: Our data suggest that cerclage in asymptomatic twin pregnancies with a short cervix may reduce the earliest SPB and may improve neonatal outcome., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To compare the efficacy of laparoscopic transabdominal cerclage (TAC) pre-pregnancy and laparoscopic TAC in pregnancy in treating cervical insufficiency., Method: A retrospective analytical study comparing outcomes of laparoscopic TAC pre-pregnancy with laparoscopic TAC in pregnancy. A total of 178 patients who underwent laparoscopic TAC at our hospital were enrolled in the study. In total, 122 patients underwent interval cerclage, and 56 patients underwent cerclage during pregnancy., Results: A total of 178 patients who met the inclusion criteria were included in the analysis. Second-trimester abortions decreased by 50%, with an overall increase in full-term live births (32.53%) in patients undergoing laparoscopic TAC pre-pregnancy. The fetal survival rate was around 90% and 85% with laparoscopic TAC pre-pregnancy and laparoscopic TAC in pregnancy, respectively. Although the obstetric outcomes of laparoscopic TAC pre-pregnancy and in pregnancy were comparable, laparoscopic TAC pre-pregnancy was safer than laparoscopic TAC in pregnancy due to the complications associated with the procedure during pregnancy., Conclusions: Laparoscopic TAC pre-pregnancy yielded better reproductive outcomes than laparoscopic TAC in pregnancy and was associated with fewer perioperative complications., (Copyright © 2023 The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada/La Société des obstétriciens et gynécologues du Canada. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Cervical incompetence is an important cause of extremely preterm delivery. Without specialized treatment, cervical incompetence has a 30% chance of recurrence in a subsequent pregnancy. Recently, the first randomized controlled trial showed significant superiority of abdominal cerclage compared with both high and low vaginal cerclage in preventing preterm delivery at <32 weeks of gestation and fetal loss in patients with a previous failed vaginal cerclage., Objective: This study aimed to assess surgical and obstetrical outcomes in patients with pre- and postconceptional laparoscopic abdominal cerclage placement. Furthermore, it also aimed to perform subgroup analysis based on the indication for cerclage placement in order to identify patients who benefit the most from an abdominal cerclage., Study Design: A retrospective multicenter cohort study with consecutive inclusion of all eligible patients from 1997 onward in the Dutch cohort (104 patients) and from 2007 onward in the Boston cohort (169 patients) was conducted. Eligible patients had at least 1 second- or third-trimester fetal loss due to cervical incompetence and/or a short or absent cervix after cervical surgery. This includes loop electrosurgical excision procedure, conization, or trachelectomy. Patients were divided into the following subgroups based on the indication for cerclage placement: (1) previous failed vaginal cerclage, (2) previous cervical surgery, and (3) other indications. The third group consisted of patients with a history of multiple second- or early third-trimester fetal losses due to cervical incompetence (without a failed vaginal cerclage) and/or multiple dilation and curettage procedures. The primary outcome measure was delivery at ≥34 weeks of gestation with neonatal survival at hospital discharge. Secondary outcome measures included surgical and obstetrical outcomes, such as pregnancy rates after preconceptional surgery, obstetrical complications, and fetal survival rates., Results: A total of 273 patients were included (250 in the preconceptional and 23 in the postconceptional cohort). Surgical outcomes of 273 patients were favorable, with 6 minor complications (2.2%). In the postconceptional cohort, 1 patient (0.4%) had hemorrhage of 650 mL, resulting in conversion to laparotomy. After preconceptional laparoscopic abdominal cerclage (n=250), the pregnancy rate was 74.1% (n=137) with a minimal follow-up of 12 months. Delivery at ³34 weeks of gestation occurred in 90.5% of all ongoing pregnancies. Four patients (3.3%) had a second-trimester fetal loss. The indication for cerclage in all 4 patients was a previous failed vaginal cerclage. The other subgroups showed fetal survival rates of 100% in ongoing pregnancies, with a total fetal survival rate of 96%. After postconceptional placement, 94.1% of all patients with an ongoing pregnancy delivered at ³34 weeks of gestation, with a total fetal survival rate of 100%. Thus, second-trimester fetal losses did not occur in this group., Conclusion: Pre- and postconceptional laparoscopic abdominal cerclage is a safe procedure with favorable obstetrical outcomes in patients with increased risk of cervical incompetence. All subgroups showed high fetal survival rates. Second-trimester fetal loss only occurred in the group of patients with a cerclage placed for the indication of previous failed vaginal cerclage, but was nevertheless rare even in this group., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The perioperative management of the cervical cerclage procedure is not unified. In general population controlling microbiome cervical status does not affect obstetric outcomes, but it might be beneficial in patients with cervical insufficiency. The aim of our study was to present the obstetric, neonatal and pediatric outcomes of patients undergoing the cervical cerclage placement procedure in our obstetric department using a regimen of care that includes control of the microbiological status of the cervix and elimination of the pathogens detected., Material and Methods: Thirty-five patients undergoing cervical cerclage in the 2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Warsaw, were included in the study. The procedure was performed only after receiving a negative culture from the cervical canal., Results: Thirty-one (88.6%) patients delivered after the 34th and twenty-eight (80.0%) after the 37th week of gestation. The colonization of the genital tract was present in 31% of patients prior to the procedure, in 42% of patients - during the subsequent pregnancy course and in 48% of patients - before delivery. A total of 85% of patients who had miscarriage or delivered prematurely had abnormal cervical cultures. In patients with normal cervical cultures, and 91.7% of women delivered at term. No abnormalities in children's development were found., Conclusions: Controlling microbiological status of the cervical canal results in better or similar outcomes to those reported by other authors in terms of obstetric and neonatal outcomes. Active eradication of the reproductive tract colonization potentially increases the effectiveness of the cervical cerclage placement.

The present study aimed to evaluate the perinatal outcomes and influencing factors in twin pregnancies undergoing emergency cervical cerclage. The present retrospective cohort study included clinical data that were recorded between January 2015 and December 2021 at The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University (China). The study included data from 103 pregnancies (26 twin and 77 singleton pregnancies) that underwent emergency cerclage and 17 twin pregnancies that underwent expectant treatment. The median gestational age of twin emergency cerclage was significantly lower than that of singleton emergency cerclage, but higher than that of expectant treatment (28.5, 34.0 and 24.0 weeks, respectively). The median interval to delivery of twin emergency cerclage was significantly lower than that of singleton emergency cerclage, but significantly higher than that of expectantly treated twin pregnancies (37.0, 78.0 and 7.0 days, respectively).IMPACT STATEMENT What is already known on this subject? An important cause of premature birth is cervical insufficiency. Cervical cerclage extends the gestational period of women with cervical insufficiency. According to 2019 SOGC's No. 373-Cervical Insufficiency and Cervical Cerclage, both twin and single pregnancies benefit from emergency cerclage. However, there is minimal information about the pregnancy outcomes of emergency cerclage in twin pregnancies. What the results of this study add? This study shows that the outcomes of pregnancy in twin pregnancies undergoing emergency cerclage were better than that of expectant treatment but worse than that in singleton pregnancies undergoing emergency cerclage. What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? In this study, pregnant women with cervical insufficiency in twin pregnancies can benefit from emergency cerclage, we should treat those pregnant women as early as possible.

We evaluated the impact of cervical cerclage combined with one or more uterine contraction inhibitors in persistent inhibition of uterine contraction for the treatment of late abortion and premature delivery. This retrospective case series study analysed the medical data of 58 patients who underwent cervical cerclage for cervical insufficiency and simultaneously received one or more uterine contraction inhibitors (indomethacin, ritodrine, and atosiban) and magnesium sulphate at the Zibo Maternal and Child Health Hospital between January 2019 and December 2020.Patients are normal pregnancy who received cervical cerclage without complications. The rate of successful treatment was 74.14% (43/58). The prolonged gestation duration was 16.42 ± 7.84 weeks, and the average delivery gestational age was 35.91 ± 5.16 weeks. The longest duration of treatment with a uterine contraction inhibitor or inhibitors in combination or with magnesium sulphate alone was 15.34 ± 13.16 days, and nine cases developed adverse reactions. Persistent uterine contraction inhibition after cervical cerclage could prolong pregnancy and improve pregnancy outcomes.Impact statement What is already known on this subject? A crucial reason for treatment failure of cervical cerclage is that uterine contraction was not effectively inhibited. What do the results of this study add? Persistent inhibition of uterine contraction after cervical cerclage prolonged pregnancy duration, increased gestational age at delivery, and improved pregnancy outcomes. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? This study may provide a clinical basis for prolonging gestational age, preventing late abortion and premature delivery, and improving the survival rate and quality of life of premature infants.

Background: Preterm birth is one of the major causes of neonatal morbidity and mortality. Preterm delivery is a large burden to our health care system, and a history of preterm birth is one of the most common risk factors for subsequent preterm birth., Objective: We sought to examine the cost-effectiveness of the history-indicated cerclage strategy compared with the transvaginal ultrasound cervical length assessment strategy in individuals with a history of preterm birth., Study Design: We developed a decision analysis model to compare history-indicated cerclage and cervical length assessment. The primary outcome was the net monetary benefit from a maternal and neonatal perspective of both strategies, defined as the value of an intervention with a known willingness to pay threshold for a unit of benefit. The time horizon was set to be a lifetime. Costs (in 2022 USD) included those for the cerclage, serial transvaginal ultrasounds, maternal care for admission, neonatal care, and severe disability. Probabilities, utilities, and costs were derived from the literature. A cost-effectiveness threshold was set at $100,000 per QALY (quality-adjusted life year). We first conducted 1-way sensitivity analyses with associated variables as sensitivity analyses. We then performed a probabilistic sensitivity analysis using Monte Carlo simulation with 1000 trials to test the robustness of the results in the setting of simultaneous changes in probabilities, costs, and utilities., Results: In our base-case analysis, the history-indicated cerclage strategy compared to transvaginal ultrasound cervical length assessment was associated with more cost ($85,038 vs $70,155), with slightly less effectiveness from the maternal perspective (26.74 QALY vs 26.78 QALY) and from the neonatal perspective (28.91 QALY vs 29.06 QALY), and with less maternal and neonatal net monetary benefit. Therefore, the history-indicated cerclage strategy was dominated. With the 1000 trials of Monte Carlo simulation, transvaginal ultrasound cervical length assessment was the preferred strategy 84% and 88% of the time from the maternal and neonatal perspectives, respectively., Conclusion: The history-indicated cerclage strategy was more expensive and slightly less effective than the transvaginal ultrasound cervical length assessment strategy with a lower net monetary benefit., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of Mersilene tape versus alternative suture types in prolonging singleton pregnancies as well as other pregnancy and neonatal outcomes, in cases of history-, ultrasound-, and exam-indicated cervical cerclage., Methods: A systematic review was conducted to identify relevant studies comparing different suture types in cervical cerclage procedures. The primary outcome of interest was preterm birth (PTB) rate < 37, <35, < 28, and < 24 weeks. Statistical analyses were performed to determine the relationship between suture type and various outcomes., Results: A total of five studies, including three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and two retrospective studies, with a combined participation of 2325 individuals, were included. The pooled analysis indicated no significant association between suture type and PTB at less than 37 weeks of gestation (RR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.65-1.60, p < 0.01, I 2  = 74%). Women who received Mersilene tape had a higher risk of PTB at 34-37 weeks (RR: 2.62, 95% CI: 1.57-4.37, p = 0.69, I 2  = 0%), but a lower risk of PTB at less than 34 weeks (RR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.28-0.66, p = 0.66, I 2  = 46%). No statistically significant differences were observed for PTB before 28 weeks (RR: 1, 95% CI: 0.65-1.53, p = 0.70, I 2  = 0%), before 24 weeks (RR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.60-1.23, p = 0.33, I 2  = 0%), incidence of chorioamnionitis (RR: 0.97, 95% CI: 020-4.83, p < 0.01, I 2  = 95%), neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission (RR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.28-2.22, p = 0.08, I 2  = 67%) and neonatal death (RR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.42-2.35, p = 0.17, I 2  = 48%)., Conclusion: Our findings suggest that Mersilene tape does not reduce the risk of PTB before 37, 28 or 24 weeks. We observed higher risk of preterm birth between 34 and 37 weeks with Mersilene tape but lower incidence before 34 weeks, a period with higher neonatal morbidity and mortality. Due to the limited number of studies, our results and their clinical significance should be interpreted with caution., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Objective: Preterm birth, defined as delivery before 37 weeks' gestation, is a major obstetric challenge and is associated with serious long-term complications in those infants that survive. Preventative management includes cervical cerclage, either as an elective procedure or performed following transvaginal ultrasound surveillance and shortening of the cervix (≤25 mm). Significant questions remain regarding the optimal management, target population and technique. Therefore, this study aimed to assess differences in risk factors and pregnancy outcomes for women who received an elective cerclage versus ultrasound surveillance, following one prior premature event (spontaneous preterm birth/second trimester loss)., Study Design: Women were retrospectively identified from St Thomas's Hospital Preterm Birth Clinical Network Database. Women who had one prior premature event (between 14 +0 and 36 +6 weeks' gestation) were included and they were separated into those that an elective cerclage and those who underwent ultrasound surveillance to assess differences in demographics, pregnancy risk factors and preterm birth outcomes. We excluded women who received other preventative therapies. We also separately analysed those women who required an ultrasound-indicated cerclage, comparing the differences between women that delivered preterm and term., Results: We collected data from 1077 women who had a prior preterm event. 66 women received an elective cerclage. 11.4% of women who had ultrasound surveillance received an ultrasound indicated cerclage. Women with a prior history of mid-trimester loss, instead of preterm birth, were more likely to receive an elective cerclage. The mean gestational age of delivery was similar between those women who received an elective cerclage and those who had ultrasound surveillance with and without an ultrasound-indicated cerclage (38 +1 vs 37 +1 ), however, preterm birth rates <37 weeks' were twice as high in this ultrasound group (OR 2.3 [1.1-4.5], p = 0.02). In those women that do require an ultrasound-indicated cerclage, 50.4% deliver preterm., Conclusions: In conclusion, this study shows that in women with one prior preterm event, both history-indicated cerclage and ultrasound surveillance are appropriate management options. The majority of women undergoing ultrasound surveillance did not require a cerclage and so avoided the potential perioperative complications of cerclage insertion. However, those that did require an ultrasound-indicated cerclage were at high risk of preterm birth so should be followed up closely to enable adequate preterm birth preparation. Further prospective studies comparing history indicated cerclage and US surveillance in women with one prior preterm event are necessary., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Crown Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Transabdominal cerclage (TAC) is a relatively uncommon intervention for preventing preterm birth. This study aimed to investigate the experience of women who had undergone this procedure., Methods: The survey was designed in collaboration with a preterm birth studies public and patient involvement (PPI) group and ethical approval was granted by KCL BDM Research Ethics Panel (LRS-19/20-13205). Members of closed Facebook group, UK TAC Support, were invited to complete an online questionnaire about their experience of TAC, and pregnancies before and after having it placed. The survey was open between December 2019 and May 2020. Open and closed questions provided both qualitative and quantitative data for analysis, which was carried out using NVivo Pro 2020 v.1.4.1 qualitative data management software and SPSS Statistics 27 (IBM)., Results: One hundred eighty-three participants completed the survey, having had TAC procedures carried out in 36 hospitals. Altogether, participants had experienced 287 preterm births (PTB) and late miscarriages (LM), equating to an average of 1.6 each (range 0-5), including 18 stillbirths. TAC was indicated in 123 (67%) for previous PTB and/or LM, 29 (16%) for cervical surgery and 31 (17%) for both. 151 (83%) TAC procedures were open, 32 (17%) laparoscopic. 86% (n = 157) were placed outside pregnancy. Of those placed in pregnancy, gestation at TAC ranged from 7 to 16 weeks. When comparing earliest pre- and post-TAC pregnancy gestation (excluding first trimester losses), median gestational weeks gained following TAC was 15.5 weeks (SD 6.89). Qualitative themes included: the struggle to get treatment; lack of TAC knowledge amongst clinicians; gratitude, hope and feeling protected; possible detrimental effects of TAC., Conclusions: This very high-risk group found having a TAC gave great reassurance and hope, and were very grateful to have found the care they needed. However, they often struggled to get this support, frequently due to lack of clinician awareness. This may improve following roll-out of NHS England's Saving Babies Live Care Bundle and NHS commissioning guidelines for care of women at risk of PTB., (© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.)

Objective: This study aimed to determine how prolapsed fetal membranes (PFM) affect perinatal outcomes in cases of cervical insufficiency undergoing emergency cerclage or expectant management., Patients and Methods: This retrospective study analyzed perinatal outcomes in 100 pregnant women with cervical insufficiency, including those with visible PFM at the cervical external os and those with protruding PFM to the vagina. The participants were subjected to either expectant management involving prescribed bedrest or emergency cerclage., Results: In the study population, 41 (41%) preferred bedrest, while 59 (59%) chose emergency cerclage. Among those managed expectantly, 10 (10%) had visible PFM, and 31 (31%) had protruding PFM. Among those who underwent emergency cerclage, 32 (32%) had visible PFM, and 27 (27%) had protruding PFM. Delivery after 32 weeks of gestation showed similar rates between women with visible and protruding PFM, regardless of the management approach chosen. These rates were significantly higher compared to those with protruding PFM managed with bed rest and emergency cerclage. Prolongation of pregnancy in protruding-cerclage and protruding-bedrest groups was 42.3±34 and 17.9±22 days, respectively., Conclusions: Our findings provide support for considering emergency cerclage as a viable option when addressing cases involving a visible form of PFM, although the recommendation is somewhat less robust in instances of protruding PFM. The implementation of an emergency cerclage procedure has the potential to extend the time frame between diagnosis and delivery, enhance neonatal survival rates, and increase the likelihood of births occurring after 28 weeks of gestation. However, it does not seem to significantly affect the rate of births taking place after 32 weeks of gestation. This could potentially lead to complications associated with premature births and extended stays in the postnatal neonatal intensive care unit. Therefore, it is crucial to offer families detailed information regarding the pros and cons of emergency cerclage.

After the United States Food and Drug Administration pulled 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate from the market for its use in prevention of recurrent spontaneous preterm birth, national societies have had mixed recommendations regarding the management of patients with a singleton pregnancy and previous spontaneous preterm birth. Herein we highlight the randomized trial data and translational evidence supporting the use of vaginal progesterone for prevention of recurrent spontaneous preterm birth in singleton pregnancies. Prophylactic vaginal progesterone starting at 16 weeks and 0 days every night should be offered to patients with singletons and previous singleton spontaneous preterm birth regardless of cervical length, and continued along with placement of cerclage if a transvaginal ultrasound cervical length ≤25 mm is detected at <24 weeks., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Importance: Cervical cerclage (CC) represents one of the few effective measures currently available for the prevention of preterm delivery caused by cervical insufficiency, thus contributing in the reduction of neonatal morbidity and mortality rates., Objective: The aim of this study was to review and compare the most recently published major guidelines on the indications, contraindications, techniques, and timing of placing and removal of CC., Evidence Acquisition: A descriptive review of guidelines from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG), the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC), and the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) on CC was carried out., Results: There is a consensus among the reviewed guidelines regarding the recommended techniques, the indications for rescue CC, the contraindications, as well as the optimal timing of CC placement and removal. All medical societies also agree that ultrasound-indicated CC is justified in women with history of prior spontaneous PTD or mid-trimester miscarriage and a short cervical length detected on ultrasound. In addition, after CC, serial sonographic measurement of the cervical length, bed rest, and routine use of antibiotics, tocolysis, and progesterone are unanimously discouraged. In case of established preterm labor, CC should be removed, according to ACOG, RCOG, and SOGC. Furthermore, RCOG and SOGC agree on the prerequisites that should be met before attempting CC. These 2 guidelines along with FIGO recommend history-indicated CC for women with 3 or more previous preterm deliveries and/or second trimester pregnancy miscarriages, whereas the ACOG suggests the use of CC in singleton pregnancies with 1 or more previous second trimester miscarriages related to painless cervical dilation or prior CC due to painless cervical dilation in the second trimester. The role of amniocentesis in ruling out intra-amniotic infection before rescue CC remains a matter of debate., Conclusions: Cervical cerclage is an obstetric intervention used to prevent miscarriage and preterm delivery in women considered as high-risk for these common pregnancy complications. The development of universal international practice protocols for the placement of CC seems of paramount importance and will hopefully improve the outcomes of such pregnancies.

Purpose of Review: Laparoscopic abdominal cerclage placement has become the favored approach for management of refractory cervical insufficiency. There are special considerations with respect to surgical method, management of pregnancy loss, and delivery following placement. This review addresses current literature on transabdominal cerclage with a focus on up-to-date minimally invasive techniques., Recent Findings: Recent literature on abdominal cerclage has compared laparoscopic and open approaches, evaluated the effect of preconception placement on fertility, and explored the upper gestational limit for dilation and evacuation with an abdominal cerclage in situ ., Summary: The objective of this article is to help minimally invasive surgeons identify candidates for transabdominal cerclage placement, understand surgical risks, succeed in their laparoscopic approach, and appropriately manage patients postoperatively., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Preterm birth (PTB) is the leading cause of neonatal mortality, and reducing the PTB rate is one of the most critical issues in perinatal medicine. Cervical insufficiency (CI), a major cause of PTB, is characterised by premature cervical ripening in the second trimester, followed by recurrent pregnancy loss. Although multiple clinical trials have suggested that progesterone inhibits cervical ripening, no studies have focused on progesterone-induced molecular signalling in CI. Here, we established a primary culture system for human uterine cervical fibroblasts using a sample of patients with refractory innate CI who underwent transabdominal cervical cerclage and patients with low Bishop scores who underwent elective caesarean section as controls. RNA sequencing showed that the progesterone response observed in the control group was impaired in the CI group. This was consistent with the finding that progesterone receptor expression was markedly downregulated in CI. Furthermore, the inhibitory effect of progesterone on lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammatory stimuli was also impaired in CI. These results suggest that abnormal cervical ripening in CI is caused by the downregulation of progesterone signalling at the receptor level, and provide a novel insight into the molecular mechanism of PTB., (© 2023. The Author(s).)