Search

The COVID-19 pandemic has brought about new stressors on university students, with a negative impact on their mental health and well-being. The purpose of this study was to examine the usefulness of a brief psychodynamically oriented intervention on general functioning by investigating changes in symptoms of depression, anxiety, hopelessness, and burnout. The sample was comprised of 67 university students (22.4% males), with a mean age of 23.27 (standard deviation (SD) = 3.27), who asked for psychological help at a psychological university service. Pre- and posttreatment data showed a significant improvement in general functioning and symptom reduction due to the psychological intervention. The mean change was very high for depression (d = 1.11) and high for general functioning (d = 0.70) and anxiety (d = 0.69). Our findings showed the importance of considering university students a vulnerable population that requires specific services within the university context and underlined the fact that mental-health-promotion policies should be extensively implemented.

The outcome of a psychodynamic counselling intervention for students seeking psychological help at a university counselling centre in Italy was evaluated by examining its effect on clinical symptoms of the students. The intervention consisted of four counselling sessions and a later three-month follow-up session. The sample (N = 160) was drawn from a population of 360 university students. An in-treatment group (n = 86) was compared to a waiting-list comparison group (n = 74). Post-test measures were administered one month after baseline for each group. The psychodynamic counselling intervention was found to be a valid method to reduce psychopathological symptoms and to improve psychological adjustment among university students.

Author(s): Rita Cerutti [sup.1] , Andrea Fontana [sup.2] , Valerio Ghezzi [sup.3] , Francesca Menozzi [sup.1] , Valentina Spensieri [sup.1] , Renata Tambelli [sup.1] Author Affiliations: (1) grid.7841.a, Department of [...], Psychological distress represents a longstanding issue that has been observed in university student populations. The present study aimed to explore the psychological distress in a group of university students seeking for psychological help available in an Italian University Counselling Service. Participants were 597 students (70.5% female, M.sub.age = 24.79, SD.sub.age = 5.08) who consulted the Psychological Service at the University and completed the Adult Self-Report (ASR) questionnaire prior to a brief psychodynamic intervention (T1) and 372 of them (70.4% females, M.sub.age = 24.85, SD.sub.age = 5.44) were re-evaluated on the same scales three months after the end of the intervention within a follow-up session. Findings demonstrated that students who dropped out at follow-up had slightly higher baseline scores in Thought Problems and Rule-Breaking Behavior. Adopting a Latent Change Score Difference (LDS) approach to model the differences between T1 and T2 scores in ASR scales, results showed an average significant and reliable decrease in all psychopathological syndromes, although the rate of this change was not uniform for all individuals (in the case of somatic complaints, this was partially accounted for by gender). Students reporting higher symptoms in three syndromes at T1 (i.e., somatic complaints, depressive symptoms, withdrawal) showed a steeper decrease of such scores at the follow-up. Findings suggest that a short-term psychological counselling intervention may represent an efficacious way to deal with emerging psychopathological distress within university contexts.

Author(s): Fiorenzo Laghi [sup.1] , Rita Cerutti [sup.2] , Arianna Terrinoni [sup.3] , Antonia Lonigro [sup.4] , Annarita Pongetti [sup.1] , Mauro Ferrara [sup.3] , Fiorella Fantini [sup.2] Author Affiliations: [...], Traditionally, non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) has been investigated through the lens of borderline personality disorder. The present study tried to overcome such a limitation, considering new criteria suggested by the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Specifically, the aim of the current study was to compare the performance of a clinical sample of adolescent inpatients who engage in self-injurious acts with healthy controls on an emotion recognition task. Results showed that adolescents with NSSI scored worse than healthy controls on the recognition of both positive and negative emotions, as well as on the entire task. Conversely, no differences between the two groups were found when they had to discriminate between neutral facial expressions. Theoretical and clinical implications were discussed.

Research Findings: The present cross-sectional study investigated the question of whether 6 different temperament dimensions (inhibition to novelty, social orientation, motor activity, positive emotionality, negative emotionality, and attention) influenced cognitive and affective theory of mind (ToM) in 168 children (86 three/four-year-olds and 82 four/five-year-olds). Temperament was measured via a parent-report questionnaire, cognitive ToM via a classical false-belief task, and affective ToM via a comprehensive test tapping 3 levels of emotion comprehension (external, mental, and reflexive). In addition, language competence was assessed with a direct test evaluating both receptive and expressive language. The results showed that after we controlled for language ability, inhibition to novelty predicted higher levels of cognitive ToM in 4/5-year-old children. In addition, higher levels of social orientation predicted better comprehension of the external aspects of emotion in both younger and older children. Practice or Policy: Our results highlight the importance of the early identification of less sociable children, who might benefit from training interventions aimed at increasing their affective ToM abilities. At the same time, they are also consistent with previous evidence indicating that an inhibited approach to social interaction can promote false-belief understanding.

Objective: This study aimed to examine the association between social withdrawal motivations (peer isolation, shyness, unsociability, low mood, and avoidance) and symptoms of hikikomori using both variable- and person-oriented analyses. Method: Adolescents (N = 212) participated in this cross-sectional study. Data were collected using the Social Withdrawal Motivations Scale and the Avoidance subscale of the Child Social Preference Scale-Revised, the 25-item Hikikomori Questionnaire, the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 Brief Form, and the Interpersonal sensitivity subscale of the Brief Symptom Inventory. Results: Path analysis revealed that peer isolation, shyness, unsociability, and avoidance were associated with symptoms of hikikomori while covarying for age, sex, maladaptive personality, and interpersonal sensitivity. Cluster analysis based on social withdrawal motivations identified four subtypes of adolescents. The group with high social withdrawal motivations showed the highest level of overall personality dysfunction and interpersonal sensitivity. Additionally, the group with high social withdrawal motivations and the group with high avoidance demonstrated higher symptoms of hikikomori compared to the other two groups, after accounting for the effects of the covariates. Conclusions: The findings highlight that the evaluation of co-occurrent social withdrawal motivations may improve the ability to identify those adolescents most in need of support. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]