Search

Background: Organizing pneumonia (OP), an interstitial lung disease, has been observed in patients with inflammatory demyelinating diseases (IDDs) treated with anti-CD20, particularly after COVID-19, but data are limited., Aim: To provide a detailed characterization of COVID-19-associated OP in IDD patients treated with anti-CD20., Methods: Bi-centric retrospective cohort study including patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), aquaporin-4-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (AQP4 + NMOSD), and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody disease (MOGAD) who received anti-CD20 and were diagnosed with COVID-19-associated OP between March 2020 and October 2023., Results: Nineteen patients were included (mean age 46.8 years; 52.6% female; 63% rituximab, 37% ocrelizumab). Sixteen had MS, two MOGAD, and one AQP4 + NMOSD. Intermittent fever was the predominant symptom. Hospitalization occurred in all but one patient, without fatalities. Chest CT consistently showed OP patterns. Thirteen patients had positive severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) PCR in bronchoalveolar lavage. Treatments included corticosteroids, antivirals, monoclonal antibodies, and convalescent plasma. Fourteen patients postponed infusions; nine resumed post-recovery (median 11.9 months), two switched due to hypogammaglobulinemia, and three stopped. After a mean follow-up of 1.5 years, lung abnormalities and clinical manifestations resolved in 18 patients; however, 13 experienced long-COVID., Conclusions: In anti-CD20-treated patients with recurrent fever and distinctive CT features, COVID-19-associated OP should be considered., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: R Carvajal is currently being funded by a Research grand from the European Charcot Foundation. In 2023, he received a grant by “Vall d′Hebron Institut de Recerca.” In 2021, he received an ECTRIMS Fellowship training performed during 2021–2022. He has also received speaking honoraria from Roche, Novartis, Biogen, Merck, and Sanofi.B Rodríguez-Acevedo has received speaking honoraria from Merck and honoraria for consulting services from Novartis.L García-Vasco has received honoraria as a speaker from Merck and Novartis; and received support for attending meetings and congresses from BMS, Horizon, Janssen, Novartis and Sanofi.A Zabalza has a predoctoral grant Rio Hortega, from the Instituto de Salud CarlosIII, Spain (CM22/00237), received travel expenses for scientific meetings from Biogen-Idec, Merck Serono and Novartis; speaking honoraria from Eisai; and a study grant from Novartis.H Ariño has received grant from Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain; JR22/00072.L Bollo is supported by a 1-year stipend endowed by the NMSS/AAN John Dystel Prize for Multiple Sclerosis Research awarded to Prof. Xavier Montalban in 2022.N Cabello-Clotet has received support for attending meetings and congresses and honoraria as a speaker from Gilead, GSK Janssen, and MSD.A Cobo-Calvo has received grant from Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain; JR19/00007.M Comabella has received compensation for consulting services and speaking honoraria from Bayer Schering Pharma, Merck Serono, Biogen-Idec, Teva Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi-Aventis, Genzyme, and Novartis.A García-Sarreón is currently an ECTRIMS clinical fellowship awardee for 2023–2024 and receives support from ECTRIMS.S Otero-Romero has received speaking and consulting honoraria from Genzyme, Biogen-Idec, Novartis, Roche, Excemed and MSD; as well as research support from Novartis.A Pappolla has received funding travel from Roche and speaking honoraria from Novartis. He performed an ECTRIMS Clinical Training Fellowship program during 2021, and is currently performing an MSIF-ARSEP Fellowship program.J Rio has received speaking honoraria and personal compensation for participating on Advisory Boards from Biogen-Idec, Genzyme, Janssen, Merck- Serono, Novartis, Teva, Roche, and Sanofi-Aventis.P Tagliani has received support during one year as an ECTRIMS clinical fellowship awardee in 2019–2020.C Tur is currently being funded by a Miguel Servet contract, awarded by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación de España (CP23/00117). She has also received a 2020 Junior Leader La Caixa Fellowship (fellowship code: LCF/BQ/PI20/11760008), awarded by “la Caixa” Foundation (ID 100010434), a 2021 Merck’s Award for the Investigation in MS awarded by Fundación Merck Salud (Spain), a 2021 Research Grant (PI21/01860) awarded by the ISCIII, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación de España, and a FORTALECE research grant (FORT23/00034) also by the ISCIII, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación de España. In 2015, she received an ECTRIMS Post-doctoral Research Fellowship and has received funding from the UK MS Society. She is a member of the Editorial Board of Neurology Journal and Multiple Sclerosis Journal. She has also received honoraria from Roche, Novartis, Merck, Immunic Therapeutics, and Bristol Myers Squibb. She is a steering committee member of the O’HAND trial and of the Consensus group on Follow-on DMTs.A Vidal-Jordana has received support has received support for contracts Juan Rodes (JR16/00024) and from Fondo de Investigación en Salud (PI17/02162 and PI22/01589) from Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain, and has engaged in consulting and/or participated as speaker in events organized by Roche, Novartis, and Merck.A Vilaseca has received a Rio Hortega grant (CM22/00247) by Institute of Health Carlos III (ISCIII).A Villar has engaged in consulting and/or participated as a speaker in events organized by Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Janssen, and Glaxo, with travel expenses covered by Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Glaxo, Chiesi, and Novartis for participation in scientific meetings. In addition, research support has been received from Janssen and GlaxoSmithKline.J Sastre-Garriga serves as co-Editor for Europe on the editorial board of Multiple Sclerosis Journal and as Editor-in-Chief in Revista de Neurología, receives research support from Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias (19/950) and has served as a consultant/speaker for Biogen, Celgene/Bristol Meyers Squibb, Sanofi, Novartis and Merck.C Oreja-Guevara has received honoraria for speaking and serving on advisory boards from Biogen Idec., F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Sanofi-Genzyme, Merck, Janssen, BMS, Novartis and Teva.M Tintoré has received compensation for consulting services, speaking honoraria and research support from Almirall, Bayer Schering Pharma, Biogen-Idec, Genzyme, Immunic Therapeutics, Janssen, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, Viela Bioand Teva Pharmaceuticals. Data Safety Monitoring Board for Parexel and UCB Biopharma, Relapse Adjudication Committee for IMCYSE SA.X Montalban has received speaking honoraria and travel expenses for participation in scientific meetings, has been a steering committee member of clinical trials or participated in advisory boards of clinical trials in the past years with Abbvie, Actelion, Alexion, Biogen, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene, EMD Serono, Genzyme, Hoffmann-La Roche, Immunic, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Medday, Merck, Mylan, Nervgen, Novartis, Sandoz, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva Pharmaceutical, TG Therapeutics, Excemed, MSIF and NMSS.G Arrambide has received speaking honoraria and consulting services or participation in advisory boards from Sanofi, Roche and Horizon Therapeutics/Amgen; and travel expenses for scientific meetings from Novartis, Roche, ECTRIMS and EAN.J Castillo, A Falcó-Roget, I Galan, I Gómez-Estévez, G Granados, G Mato-Chain, D La Puma, L Midaglia, A Nieto-García, M Rodríguez, and I Sansano report no disclosures.

Background: Matings between male Aedes aegypti mosquitoes infected with wAlbB strain of Wolbachia and wildtype females yield non-viable eggs. We evaluated the efficacy of releasing wAlbB-infected Ae. aegypti male mosquitoes to suppress dengue., Methods: We specified the protocol of a two-arm cluster-randomized test-negative controlled trial (cRCT) and emulated it using a nationally representative test-negative/positive database of individuals reporting for febrile illness to any public hospital, general practitioner or polyclinic. We retrospectively built a cohort of individuals who reside in Wolbachia locations vs a comparator control group who do not reside in Wolbachia locations, using a nationally representative database of all individuals whom report for febrile illness and were tested for dengue at the Environmental Health Institute/hospital laboratories/commercial diagnostic laboratories, through general practitioner clinic, polyclinic or public/private hospital from epidemiological week (EW) 1 2019 to EW26 2022. We emulated a constrained randomization protocol used in cRCTs to balance dengue risk between intervention and control arms in the pre-intervention period. We used the inverse probability weighting approach to further balance the intervention and control groups using a battery of algorithmically selected sociodemographic, environmental and anthropogenic variables. Intention-to-treat analyses were conducted to estimate the risk reduction of dengue given Wolbachia exposure., Results: Intention-to-treat analyses revealed that, compared with controls, Wolbachia releases for 3, 6 and ≥12 months was associated to 47% (95% confidence interval: 25-69%), 44% (33-77%) and 61% (38-78%) protective efficacy against dengue, respectively. When exposed to ≥12 months of Wolbachia releases, protective efficacies ranged from 49% (13-72%) to 77% (60-94%) across years. The proportion of virologically confirmed dengue cases was lower overall in the intervention arm. Protective efficacies were found across all years, age and sex subgroups, with higher durations of Wolbachia exposure associated to greater risk reductions of dengue., Conclusion: Results demonstrated that Wolbachia-mediated sterility can strengthen dengue control in tropical cities, where dengue burden is the greatest., (© International Society of Travel Medicine 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Background: Incompatible insect technique (IIT) coupled with sterile insect technique (SIT) via the release of sterile male Wolbachia-infected mosquitoes is a promising tool for Aedes-borne disease control. Yet, real-world evidence on the suppressive effectiveness of IIT-SIT on mosquito abundance remains mostly limited to small semi-rural village and suburban localities over short trial durations. However, a large proportion of Aedes-borne diseases occur in dense, urban, and high-rise locations, limiting the applicability of previous studies for these settings with high disease burden. The sustainability and use of this technology over multiple years is also unknown., Methods: In this synthetic control study, we conducted a large-scale, field trial of IIT-SIT targeting Aedes aegypti among high-rise public housing estates in Singapore, an equatorial city state. Routinely collected data from a large, nationwide surveillance system of 57 990 unique mosquito traps, combined with a high-dimensional set of anthropogenic and environmental confounders were collected to ascertain mosquito abundance and its key drivers. Four townships were selected as the intervention groups (approximate population size of 607 872 residents as of 2022), wherein interventions that combined ITT with SIT over the course of the study period were conducted. Townships were subject to releases of wAlbB-SG male A aegypti mosquitoes twice a week. Data were assessed over the course of epidemiological weeks (EWs), which provide the finest temporal resolution of recorded Wolbachia release schedule and mosquito abundance data. A novel synthetic control framework was then developed to account for the non-randomised and staggered adoption setting of the intervention across trial sectors to identify the direct suppressive effectiveness of IIT-SIT on female A aegypti populations, the spillover effects in non-release areas, and the effect of the intervention on other mosquito populations such as Aedes albopictus. Furthermore, we recalculated effectiveness in terms of calendar time, time since intervention, and over multiple sites to examine heterogeneities in IIT-SIT effectiveness., Findings: Between EW27 2018 and EW26 2022, Wolbachia releases were conducted across 117 sectors, of which 97 had sufficient trap data, which were collected between EW8 2019 and EW26 2022. We found that Wolbachia-based IIT-SIT reduced wild-type female A aegypti populations by a mean of 62·01% (95% CI 60·68 to 63·26) by 3 months, 78·40% (77·56 to 79·18) by 6 months, and 91·32% (90·95 to 91·66) by at least 18 months of releases. We also found a smaller but non-negligible spillover suppression effect that gradually increased over time (mean spillover intervention effectiveness 61·02% [95% CI 57·89 to 63·72] in adjacent, non-intervention sectors). Although no consistent change in A albopictus populations was seen across the four intervention townships after Wolbachia releases, the average intervention effectiveness on the A albopictus population across all release sectors was -25·80% (95% CI -30·93 to -21·05), which was driven by increases in two towns., Interpretation: Our results demonstrate the potential of IIT-SIT for strengthening long-term, large-scale vector control in tropical cities, where dengue burden is the greatest. The effect of these interventions in different geographical settings should be assessed in future work., Funding: Singapore's Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Sustainability and the Environment, National Environment Agency, and National Robotics Program., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests DDY is a paid employee of Orinno Technology. EGK and YY are paid employees of Verily Life Sciences. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: This trial is a parallel, two-arm, non-blinded cluster randomised controlled trial that is under way in Singapore, with the aim of measuring the efficacy of male Wolbachia-infected Aedes aegypti deployments in reducing dengue incidence in an endemic setting with all four dengue serotypes in circulation. The trial commenced in July 2022 and is expected to conclude in September 2024. The original study protocol was published in December 2022. Here, we describe amendments that have been made to the study protocol since commencement of the trial., Methods: The key protocol amendments are (1) addition of an explicit definition of Wolbachia exposure for residents residing in intervention sites based on the duration of Wolbachia exposure at point of testing, (2) incorporation of a high-dimensional set of anthropogenic and environmental characteristics in the analysis plan to adjust for baseline risk factors of dengue transmission, and (3) addition of alternative statistical analyses for endpoints to control for post hoc imbalance in cluster-based environmental and anthropogenic characteristics., Discussion: The findings from this study will provide the first experimental evidence for the efficacy of releasing male-Wolbachia infected mosquitoes to reduce dengue incidence in a cluster-randomised controlled trial. The trial will conclude in 2024 and results will be reported shortly thereafter., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT05505682. Registered on 16 August 2022. Retrospectively registered. Last updated 11 November 2023., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Due to the absence of available therapeutics and good vaccines, vector control solutions are needed to mitigate the spread of dengue. Matings between male Aedes aegypti mosquitoes infected with the wAlbB strain of Wolbachia and wildtype females yield non-viable eggs. We evaluated the efficacy of releasing wAlbB-infected A aegypti male mosquitoes to suppress dengue incidence., Methods: In this synthetic control study, we conducted large-scale field trials in Singapore involving release of wAlbB-infected A aegypti male mosquitoes for dengue control via vector population suppression, from epidemiological week (EW) 27, 2018, to EW 26, 2022. We selected two large towns (Yishun and Tampines) to adopt an expanding release strategy and two smaller towns (Bukit Batok and Choa Chu Kang) to adopt a targeted-release approach. Releases were conducted two times a week in high-rise public housing estates. All intervention and control locations practised the same baseline dengue control protocol. The main outcome was weekly dengue incidence rate caused by any dengue virus serotype. We used incidence data collected by the Singapore Ministry of Health to assess the efficacy of the interventions. To compare interventions, we used the synthetic control method to generate appropriate counterfactuals for the intervention towns using a weighted combination of 30 control towns between EW 1, 2014 and EW 26, 2022., Findings: Our study comprised an at-risk population of 607 872 individuals living in intervention sites and 3 894 544 individuals living in control sites. Interventions demonstrated up to 77·28% (121/156, 95% CI 75·81-78·58) intervention efficacy despite incomplete coverage across all towns until EW 26, 2022. Intervention efficacies increased as release coverage increased across all intervention sites. Releases led to 2242 (95% CI 2092-2391) fewer cases per 100 000 people in intervention sites during the study period. Secondary analysis showed that these intervention effects were replicated across all age groups and both sexes for intervention sites., Interpretation: Our results demonstrated the potential of Wolbachia-mediated incompatible insect technique for strengthening dengue control in tropical cities, where dengue burden is the greatest., Funding: Singapore Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Sustainability, and the National Environment Agency, and the Singapore National Robotics Program., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests We declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Encephalopathy following Ifosfamide treatment is a well-described phenomenon that is typically treated with Methylene Blue (MB). Chloroacetaldehyde, a potentially neurotoxic metabolite of Ifosfamide is hypothesized to cause this encephalopathy. Current guidelines for treatment is to stop Ifosfamide and provide supportive care. MB acts to inhibit Chloroacetaldehyde formation and has been described as a therapy and prophylaxis for Ifosfamide-encephalopathy. MB is effective within 30 min and lasts up to 3 days. Prolonged encephalopathy and MB therapy has not been described in the literature as lasting longer than 30 days following treatment., Case Presentation: We present the case of an 11-year-old female with autistic spectrum disorder and recurrent episodes of severe somnolence for 7 months following Ifosfamide therapy for her Non-Germinomatous Germ Cell Tumor (GCT). Periods of somnolence occurred prior to receiving cranial RT. Administration of MB gave immediate but limited response, with resolution of somnolence lasting 1-2 days between administrations. The somnolence could not be explained by neuroimaging or laboratory evaluation, but EEG indicated persistent encephalopathy., Conclusion: A literature review determines that neurotoxicity is a side effect of Ifosfamide, but this effect has not been described persisting longer than 30 days. Our case continued to require treatment with MB for 7 months following cessation of therapy. We report these novel clinical findings, and hypothesize that there could be a genetic/metabolic component linking this reaction to Ifosfamide with the case patient's pre-existing autism. This possible association may also correlate to the already-established link between autism and the development of GCTs. This hypothesis leads to further discussion on the suitable usage of Ifosfamide in children with co-morbidities and the necessity of screening prior to its usage., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

In this study, we aimed to quantify KREC (kappa-deleting recombination excision circle) levels and naive B cell output in healthy HIV-uninfected children, compared with HIV-infected South African children, before and after starting ART (antiretroviral therapy). Samples were acquired from a Child Wellness Clinic (n = 288 HIV-uninfected South African children, 2 weeks-12 years) and the Children with HIV Early Antiretroviral Therapy (CHER) trial (n = 153 HIV-infected South African children, 7 weeks-8 years). Naive B cell output was estimated using a mathematical model combining KREC levels to reflect B cell emigration into the circulation, flow cytometry measures of naive unswitched B cells to quantify total body naive B cells, and their rates of proliferation using the intracellular marker Ki67. Naive B cell output increases from birth to 1 year, followed by a decline and plateau into late childhood. HIV-infected children on or off ART had higher naive B cell outputs than their uninfected counterparts (p = .01 and p = .04). This is the first study to present reference ranges for measurements of KRECs and naive B cell output in healthy and HIV-infected children. Comparison between HIV-uninfected healthy children and HIV-infected children suggests that HIV may increase naive B cell output. Further work is required to fully understand the mechanisms involved and clinical value of measuring naive B cell output in children.

Background and Aims: Learning from error can have a negative impact on the staff involved in the error ('second victim phenomenon' 1 ). We created a project, based on the principles of the Learning from Excellence project, 2 to learn from excellence and correct the imbalance of negative to positive feedback in the context of hospital practice., Methods and Results: Using a questionnaire, we surveyed staff on existing feedback mechanisms and morale. We then introduced a system where staff recorded and commented on examples of excellence in practice. Recipients and their supervisors received copies of these reports and the feedback was analysed and discussed with senior staff (consultant, senior charge nurse, managers). We re-audited the staff two months after starting this project and noted improvements in staff morale and in positive reporting., Conclusions: This project has improved the process of giving and learning from positive feedback and had a significant impact on staff morale. We can also demonstrate an example of improved clinical practice (from feedback received) and will now attempt to measure clinical outcomes with a new prospective study. Finally, we hope to set up a regional programme of reporting excellence in South-East Scotland.