Search

To provide real-world data on the addition of basal insulin (BI) in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (PWD2) suboptimally controlled with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) therapy. However, real-world data on the addition of BI to GLP-1RA therapy are limited.We used a US electronic medical record data source (IBM® Explorys®) that includes approximately 4 million PWD2 to assess the real-world impact of adding the second-generation BI analogue insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) to GLP-1RA therapy. Insulin-naïve PWD2 receiving GLP-1RAs who also received Gla-300 between March 1, 2015 and September 30, 2019 were identified; participants were required to have data for ≥12 months before, and ≥6 months after, addition of Gla-300.The mean (standard deviation [SD]) age of participants (N = 271) was 57.9 (10.8) years. Baseline glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) was 9.16% and was significantly reduced (-0.97 [SD 1.60]%; P 0.0001) after addition of Gla-300; a significant increase in the proportion of PWD2 achieving HbA1c control was observed after addition of Gla-300 (HbA1c7.0%: 4.80% vs. 22.14%, P 0.0001; HbA1c8.0%: 19.56% vs. 51.29%, P 0.0001). The incidence of overall (8.49% vs. 9.59%; P = 0.513) and inpatient/emergency department (ED)-associated hypoglycaemia (0.37% vs. 0.74%; P = 1.000), as well as overall (0.33 vs. 0.46 per person per year [PPPY]; P = 0.170) and inpatient/ED-associated hypoglycaemia events (0.01 vs. 0.04 PPPY; P = 0.466) were similar before and after addition of Gla-300.In US real-world clinical practice, adding Gla-300 to GLP-1RA significantly improved glycaemic control without significantly increasing hypoglycaemia in PWD2. Further research into the effect of adding Gla-300 to GLP-1RA therapy is warranted.

To assess patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in the SoliMix trial, which compared the efficacy and safety of iGlarLixi versus BIAsp 30 in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D).SoliMix (EudraCT: 2017-003370-13), a 26-week, open-label study, randomized (1:1) 887 adults with T2D and HbA1c ≥7.5%-≤10.0% (≥58-≤86 mmol/mol) on basal insulin plus oral antihyperglycaemic drugs (OADs) to once-daily iGlarLixi or twice-daily premix insulin, BIAsp 30. PROs were assessed using the Treatment-Related Impact Measure Diabetes (TRIM-D) and Global Treatment Effectiveness Evaluation (GTEE) questionnaires.Over 26 weeks, iGlarLixi showed greater improvement from baseline versus BIAsp 30 in total TRIM-D score (least squares mean difference [95% confidence interval]: 5.08 [3.69, 6.47]; effect size: 0.32) and in each TRIM-D domain, with the greatest differences seen in diabetes management (8.47 [6.11, 10.84]) and treatment burden (6.95 [4.83, 9.07]). GTEE scores showed a greater proportion of participants and physicians rated a complete or marked improvement of diabetes control with iGlarLixi (80.5%, 82.8%) versus BIAsp 30 (63.3%, 65.1%) at week 26. Post hoc analyses showed that after adjusting for HbA1c, body weight and hypoglycaemia outcomes, iGlarLixi continued to show greater improvements in TRIM-D total scores versus BIAsp 30.In addition to better glycaemic control, weight benefit and less hypoglycaemia, once-daily iGlarLixi provided improved diabetes management, treatment burden and perceived effectiveness versus twice-daily premix BIAsp 30, further supporting iGlarLixi as an advanced treatment option in people with suboptimally controlled T2D on basal insulin plus OADs.

Introduction Randomized controlled trials and real-world data from the USA have shown similar glycemic control with insulin glargine 300 U/ml (Gla-300) and insulin glargine 100 U/ml (Gla-100) and reduced hypoglycemia risk with Gla-300. This real-world study describes the efficacy and safety of Gla-300 and Gla-100 in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in France, Spain, and Germany. Methods This retrospective chart review analysis used anonymized data for adults with T2D switching basal insulin analog (BIA) therapy to Gla-300 or Gla-100, or insulin-naïve patients initiating Gla-300 or Gla-100. Outcomes included change from baseline to 6-month follow-up in glycated hemoglobin A1c (A1C), total and severe hypoglycemia incidences and events, insulin dose, and reasons for BIA choice. Results Six hundred sixty-five physicians (33.8% Spain, 31.7% France, 34.4% Germany) provided chart data for patients switching to Gla-300 (n = 679) or Gla-100 (n = 429) or initiating Gla-300 (n = 719) or Gla-100 (n = 711). After adjustment for baseline characteristics, A1C reductions from baseline were similar for patients switching to Gla-300 or Gla-100 (− 0.87% vs. − 0.93%; p = 0.326) while those switched to Gla-300 vs. Gla-100 had a significantly greater mean reduction in hypoglycemic events (− 1.29 vs. − 0.81 events during 6 months; p = 0.012). Mean insulin doses after titration were 0.43 ± 0.36 and 0.40 ± 0.28 U/kg in Gla-300 and Gla-100 switchers, respectively. Factors that significantly influenced BIA choice included a lower risk of hypoglycemia (for Gla-300) and physician familiarity (for Gla-100). Outcomes for insulin-naïve patients were broadly similar to those of switchers. Conclusions In this real-world European study, patients with T2D who switched therapy to Gla-300 or Gla-100 had improved glycemic control and reduced hypoglycemia at 6 months, with significant hypoglycemia advantages with Gla-300. Electronic Supplementary Material The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-020-01436-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Aims To compare 12‐month clinical effectiveness of insulin glargine 300 units/mL (Gla‐300) versus first‐generation basal insulin analogues (BIAs) (insulin glargine 100 units/mL [Gla‐100] or insulin detemir [IDet]) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) who were at high risk of hypoglycaemia and switched from one BIA to a different one (Gla‐300 or Gla‐100/IDet) in a real‐world setting. Methods DELIVER High Risk was a retrospective observational cohort study of 2550 patients with T2D who switched BIA to Gla‐300 (Gla‐300 switchers) and were propensity score‐matched (1:1) to patients who switched to Gla‐100 or IDet (Gla‐100/IDet switchers). Outcomes were change in glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), attainment of HbA1c goals (, In patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of hypoglycaemia, risk of inpatient/emergency department‐related hypoglycaemia was significantly lower during 12 months after switching to insulin glargine 300 units/mL, compared with switching to insulin glargine 100 units/mL or insulin detemir.

In PWD2 inadequately controlled with GLP-1 RA therapy, addition of basal insulin is recommended. We used a US electronic medical record data source (IBM Explorys) of ~4 million PWD2 to assess the real-world impact of adding the basal insulin analog Gla-300 to GLP-1RA therapy in PWD2. Insulin-naive PWD2 receiving GLP1-RAs who subsequently received Gla-300 between Mar 1, 2015-Sep 30, 2019 were identified; patients were required to have data for ≥12 months prior, and ≥6-month after, addition of Gla-300. Mean age of participants (N=271) was 57.9 (SD: 10.8) years. Baseline HbA1c was 9.16%, and was significantly reduced (0.97 [SD:1.60], p Disclosure T. S. Bailey: Consultant; Self; Abbott Diabetes, LifeScan, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Research Support; Self; Abbott, Abbott Diabetes, Biolinq, Capillary Biomedical, Inc., Dexcom, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Kowa Research Institute, Inc., Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Livongo, Medtronic, Medtrum Technologies, Novo Nordisk, REMD Biotherapeutics, Sanofi, Sanvita, Viacyte, Inc., vTv Therapeutics, Zealand Pharma A/S, Speaker’s Bureau; Self; BD, Medtronic, Sanofi. J. Westerbacka: Employee; Self; Sanofi, Stock/Shareholder; Self; Sanofi. C. Nicholls: Employee; Self; Sanofi. J. Gill: Employee; Self; Sanofi US, Other Relationship; Self; American Diabetes Association, Stock/Shareholder; Self; Sanofi US. M. Jones s: None. L. Shenoy: None. Funding Sanofi

Introduction: Treatment complexity can impact treatment adherence, which may affect clinical outcomes in people with T2D. This analysis assessed PROs in the SoliMix trial. Methods: SoliMix, an open-label, multicenter study, randomized adults with T2D and HbA1c ≥7.5-≤10 % on BI + OADs to once-daily iGlarLixi or twice-daily premix insulin analog (BiAsp 70/30). Between-treatment differences from baseline to Week 26 (W26) in Treatment-Related Impact Measure for Diabetes (TRIM-D) scores are shown overall and by domain. Global Treatment Effectiveness Evaluation (GTEE) endpoints were analyzed descriptively at W26. Results: As well as providing better glycemic control, iGlarLixi demonstrated greater improvement in each TRIM-D domain vs. BiAsp 70/30 from baseline to W26 (Figure), with the greatest differences seen in diabetes management and treatment burden scores. GTEE scores also showed a greater proportion of participants and physicians who rated complete or marked improvement of diabetes control with iGlarLixi (81% and 83%) vs. BiAsp 70/30 (63% and 65%) at W26. Conclusions: Advancing BI with iGlarLixi resulted in a greater positive impact than with premix 70/30 for people with T2D uncontrolled on BI + OADs, suggesting a potentially lower treatment burden with iGlarLixi. Disclosure W. H. Polonsky: Advisory Panel; Self; Intarcia Therapeutics, Inc., Consultant; Self; Abbott Diabetes, ADOCIA, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Dexcom, Inc., Insulet Corporation, Lilly Diabetes, Novo Nordisk, Onduo LLC., Sanofi US. J. Rosenstock: Board Member; Self; Applied Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Intarcia Therapeutics, Inc., Novo Nordisk, Oramed Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Sanofi, Consultant; Self; Applied Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Intarcia Therapeutics, Inc., Novo Nordisk, Oramed Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Sanofi, Research Support; Self; Applied Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Genentech, Inc., Intarcia Therapeutics, Inc., Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Novo Nordisk, Oramed Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Pfizer Inc., REMD Biotherapeutics, Sanofi. R. J. Mccrimmon: Advisory Panel; Self; Novo Nordisk Inc., Sanofi-Aventis, Board Member; Self; Novo Nordisk Foundation, Research Support; Self; AstraZeneca. K. H. Whitmire: None. F. Giorgino: Consultant; Self; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Lilly Diabetes, Novo Nordisk, Roche Diabetes Care, Sanofi, Research Support; Self; Lilly Diabetes, Roche Diabetes Care. J. Chen: None. C. Nicholls: Employee; Self; Sanofi. E. Lew: Employee; Self; Sanofi. A. Alvarez: Employee; Self; Sanofi. M. Coudert: Employee; Self; Sanofi. Funding Sanofi (EudraCT 2017-003370-13)

Randomized controlled trial (RCT) populations often do not reflect those typically seen in clinical practice. This retrospective, observational cohort study analysed real-world data of people with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) prescribed basal insulin analogues from electronic medical records (EMRs) in the Explorys database, which includes data from 39 integrated healthcare systems in the USA, to determine how representative selected RCTs investigating insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) are of T2DM populations in a real-world setting. Applying eligibility criteria derived from the EDITION 1, 2, and 3 (Gla-300 vs 100 U/mL [Gla-100]) and BRIGHT (Gla-300 vs insulin degludec) RCTs, we observed that only 17% (33,345/191,218) of people captured in the real-world database would have been eligible for such trials. Those who were ineligible tended to be older, had more comorbidities and a higher baseline hypoglycaemia rate than the eligible group. Using another large US EMR database (Optum Humedica) as corroboration, we found that 15% (36,285/235,697) would have been eligible to participate in the EDITION/BRIGHT RCTs. Furthermore, only 7% (1734/24,547) would have been eligible for the CONCLUDE (insulin degludec vs Gla-300) RCT. Our findings remind us of the value of real-world data studies, complementing the results of RCTs, and providing additional insights into groups who would typically be excluded from RCTs. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

DELIVER - High Risk study compared long-term clinical outcomes for patients with T2D and high hypoglycemia risk on first-generation BIs who were switched to Gla-300 or other first-generation BIs (other switchers). Electronic medical record data from the PHIE database were used. Eligible patients (age >18 years) had ≥1 criterion for high hypoglycemia risk (age >64 years; basal-bolus insulin use; renal impairment; uncontrolled baseline A1C; sulfonylurea use; atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; history indicating high risk, including ≥1 severe hypoglycemic episode (prior 12 months). Endpoints were A1C reduction from baseline to 9-12 months, attainment of A1C goals ( Disclosure S.D. Sullivan: Research Support; Self; Sanofi. N. Freemantle: Advisory Panel; Self; Sanofi. Research Support; Self; Akcea Therapeutics, Allergan, AstraZeneca, Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., Sanofi, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; Sanofi. A.A. Menon: None. R. Gupta: None. J. Wu: Employee; Self; Sanofi US. C. Nicholls: Employee; Self; Sanofi. J. Westerbacka: Employee; Self; Sanofi. Stock/Shareholder; Self; Sanofi. T.S. Bailey: Advisory Panel; Self; Abbott. Consultant; Self; Capillary Biomedical, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Medtronic, Novo Nordisk Inc., Sanofi. Research Support; Self; Abbott, Ascensia Diabetes Care, Becton, Dickinson and Company, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Calibra Medical, Capillary Biomedical, Inc., Companion Medical, Dance Biopharm Holdings Inc., Dexcom, Inc., Diasome Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, GlySens Incorporated, Kowa Pharmaceutical Europe Co. Ltd., Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Medtronic, Novo Nordisk Inc., POPS! Diabetes Care, POPS! Diabetes Care, Sanofi, Senseonics, vTv Therapeutics, Xeris Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Zealand Pharma A/S. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; Abbott, MannKind Corporation, Medtronic, Novo Nordisk Inc., Sanofi US, Senseonics. Funding Sanofi

RCTs are the gold standard for comparing therapies’ efficacy and safety but can have strict eligibility criteria and may not reflect real-life clinical practice. Electronic medical records such as those from the Predictive Health Intelligence Environment (PHIE) database may be used to assess clinical effectiveness in real-world populations missed by clinical trials. We describe here the proportion and characteristics of patients with T2DM who would have been excluded from RCTs using eligibility criteria adapted from the EDITION 1-3 and BRIGHT trials. Records from people with T2DM, with a basal insulin prescription on the index date (1 March 2015) and ≥1 HbA1c value in the previous 12 months, were evaluated. Exclusion criteria included HbA1c 10.0 %, systolic blood pressure >180 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure >95 mmHg, or key comorbidities (e.g., heart failure or stroke) in the previous 12 months. Of 191,218 evaluated records, 157,873 (83%) met ≥1 exclusion criterion; only 33,345 (17%) could have been included in RCTs (Table). Excluded patients were older, with more previous hypoglycemia vs. included patients and were less likely to have HbA1c between 7 and 9 %. This divergence in clinical characteristics and patient numbers highlights the need for real-world studies assessing clinical effectiveness in populations of interest typically excluded from RCTs. Disclosure D. Mauricio: Advisory Panel; Self; Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Sanofi. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; Almirall, S.A., Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Lilly Diabetes, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Novo Nordisk A/S, Sanofi, Urgo Medical. J. Westerbacka: Employee; Self; Sanofi. Stock/Shareholder; Self; Sanofi. C. Nicholls: Employee; Self; Sanofi. J. Wu: Employee; Self; Sanofi US. R. Gupta: None. A.A. Menon: None. B. Eliasson: Advisory Panel; Self; Amgen Inc., AstraZeneca, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH. Other Relationship; Self; Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk A/S, Sanofi. Funding Sanofi

Aim To compare glycaemic control, hypoglycaemia and treatment discontinuation of insulin glargine 300 units/mL (Gla‐300) and insulin degludec (IDeg) in a real‐world study of insulin‐naïve adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Materials and methods DELIVER Naive D was a retrospective observational study that used electronic medical record data from the IBM Watson Health Explorys database. Insulin‐naïve adults with T2D who started Gla‐300 or IDeg between March 2015 and September 2017 were identified. Patients were active in the system for ≥12 months before and ≥6 months after starting Gla‐300 or IDeg and had HbA1c measurements during 6‐month baseline and 3‐ to 6‐month follow‐up. Outcomes were compared among 1:1 propensity score‐matched cohorts. Results In the matched cohorts (n = 638 each), the mean age was 59 years, approximately 53% were male, and mean HbA1c was 9.67% (82 mmol/mol). Mean (SD) HbA1c decreases were comparable in the Gla‐300 and IDeg cohorts (−1.67% [2.22] and −1.58% [2.20]; P = 0.51), as were HbA1c target attainment [