Search

Background: Trismus therapy is often delayed after jaw reconstruction to avoid hardware failure or non‐union. The aim of this study is to document the forces that have been applied to patients undergoing free flap reconstruction of the oral cavity in the 12 months following oral cavity reconstruction, and to analyze the associations between force and maximal interincisal opening (MIO) over time. Methods: Participants with trismus after free flap reconstruction of the oral cavity completed a 10‐week jaw stretching program using Restorabite™. Primary outcome measures included the minimum and maximal force applied by a trismus device during rehabilitation, MIO, bone union, and health‐related quality of life outcomes up to 12 months postoperatively. Results: A mean of 20.6 Newtons (N) was used during passive exercises and 38.9 N during active exercises was used during trismus therapy. The mean increase in MIO for the 45 participants after 10 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months of therapy was 8.4 mm (p < 0.001), 12.6 mm (p < 0.001), 12.7 mm (p < 0.001), respectively. There was no significant difference in the mean minimal (p = 0.37) or mean maximal (p = 0.08) force applied between those who underwent osseous free flap reconstruction compared to fasciocutaneous only, respectively. In patients who underwent osseous reconstruction, 25 (67.6%) had complete bone union and 12 (32.4%) had partial union at 12 months postsurgery. Conclusions: In participants undergoing osseous free flap reconstruction, there was no association between the force applied to the rates of bone union. Further research to define safe and optimal loading may benefit patients undergoing jaw reconstruction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Head and neck cancer treatment often leads to trismus, a condition characterized by limited mouth opening. Exercise‐based therapy is the most common intervention but there are no clear guidelines as to the optimal exercise regimen. Restorabite™ is a portable and force‐regulated trismus device designed to enhance exercise adherence. This study explores the adherence to exercises using Restorabite™ in head and neck cancer patients with trismus and identifies facilitators and barriers to exercise therapy. Materials and methods: Mixed‐methods, prospective cohort study undertaken at a quaternary oncology hospital, in Sydney Australia involving participants diagnosed with head and neck cancer diagnosed with trismus (maximal incisal opening under 35 mm). Patients underwent a 10‐week individualized trismus program using Restorabite™ with weekly speech pathology reviews. Exercise adherence was tracked through categorized descriptors. Data were collected prospectively at baseline, during 10 weeks of therapy with Restorabite™, and at 6‐ and 12‐month post‐trismus exercise. Participants described facilitators of trismus therapy, and barriers to completing the prescribed exercises. Clinical documentation of these responses was then analyzed using content analysis. Results: One‐hundred and thirty‐five participants were recruited. During the intervention 69% (n = 93) exercised as recommended, 24% (n = 32) exercised less, and 7% (n = 10) exercised more than recommended. At 6 months post‐intervention, 55.5% (n = 75) exercised as recommended, 38.5% (n = 52) exercised less, and 4% (n = 6) exercised more. At 12 months, 36% (n = 49) exercised as recommended, 48% (n = 62) exercised less, and 11% (n = 15) exercised more. MIO increased from a mean of 18.6 mm at baseline, to 30.1 mm at the end of the 10‐week intervention. This was maintained at 6 and 12 months (31.7 and 32.1 mm, respectively). Adherence to the exercise program was associated with greater improvement in maximum interincisal opening (p < 0.001). Facilitators of adherence included intrinsic motivation, device portability, perceived functional change, and external support tools. Barriers included cancer treatment toxicities, competing priorities, and health challenges. Positive outcomes included functional improvements, while negative outcomes included increased pain. Conclusions: Seventy‐six percent of patients prescribed Restorabite™ performed trismus exercises at or more than the recommended frequency. Facilitators and barriers identified provide insights into factors influencing adherence. Future research should involve comparative studies that compare the adherence and effectiveness of different exercise programs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Understanding the barriers and facilitators for prophylactic swallowing and trismus exercises for patients undergoing radiation to the head and neck may help exercise adherence. The analysis reviews all published reports of exercise adherence with a critical appraisal following PRISMA guidelines. A total of 137 potential papers were identified; 20 studies met the inclusion criteria. The most commonly reported facilitators for swallowing and trismus exercises were regular clinician contact and online resources to reinforce instructions, set goals, and manage radiation toxicities. Social support and perceived benefit from exercises were also reported to be of help. The most common barriers to exercise were radiation toxicities, anxiety, feeling overwhelmed with information, and not understanding the reason for the exercises. Understanding facilitators and barriers to adherence is critical when designing exercise interventions for patients undergoing radiation for head and neck cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]