Search

Background: In patients with asthma, particularly severe asthma, poor adherence to inhaled drugs negatively affects the achievement of disease control. A better adherence rate is expected in the case of injected drugs, such as omalizumab, as they are administered only in a hospital setting. However, adherence to omalizumab has never been systematically investigated. The aim of this study was to review the omalizumab drop-out rate in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-life studies. A comparative analysis was performed between published data and the Italian North East Omalizumab Network (NEONet) database.Results: In RCTs the drop-out rate ranged from 7.1 to 19.4 %. Although the reasons for withdrawal were only occasionally reported, patient decision and adverse events were the most frequently reported causes. In real-life studies the drop-out rate ranged from 0 to 45.5 %. In most cases lack of efficacy was responsible for treatment discontinuation. According to NEONet data, 32 % of treated patients dropped out, with an increasing number of drop outs observed over time. Patient decision and lack of efficacy accounted for most treatment withdrawals.Conclusions: Treatment adherence is particularly crucial in patients with severe asthma considering the clinical impact of the disease and the cost of non-adherence. The risk of treatment discontinuation has to be carefully considered both in the experimental and real-life settings. Increased knowledge regarding the main reasons for patient withdrawal is important to improve adherence in clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In reactive arthritis (ReA) a specific T cell response to the triggering bacterial antigen is present in the synovial fluid, while in paired peripheral blood T cells the response is markedly reduced. The proliferative response to ReA-associated bacteria in the peripheral blood of ReA patients was compared with that seen in the blood of healthy adults, who denied exposure to these microbes, and in the umbilical cord blood of newborns, who have clearly not been exposed to bacterial antigen. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from non-exposed adults and those from umbilical cord blood proliferated to ReA-associated bacteria, whilst little response was seen in ReA PBMC. The response was MHC class II-restricted, required processing of the bacterial antigen, was seen in both CD45RO+ and CD45RA+ subsets, and was not oligoclonal. These T cell responses are similar to (hose previously demonstrated in non-exposed individuals to malaria, leishmania and trypanosoma antigen, and may reflect the existence of 'natural' T ceil immunity to ReA-associated bacteria. The lack of such responses in ReA peripheral blood may suggest that such 'natural' responses may restrict the dissemination or progression of infection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A long-term prospective study was performed to evaluate the safety and long-term outcome of surgical arthroscopy (AS) for persistent rheumatoid (RA) and psoriatic (PsA) knee joint synovitis (KJS). Local signs of joint inflammation (tenderness, swelling, ‘ballottement’) and range of motion (ROM) were scored and the sum, taken as a global outcome measure, was recorded in 17 RA and 18 PsA knees, both before and at follow-up periods of 2, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after surgical AS (knee joint synovectomy; meniscal curettage, cartilage shaving or chondrectomy, according to the degree of cartilage damage). A survival analysis (Kaplan-Meier) of the long-term outcome of surgical AS treatment and of the predictive value of clinical parameters of knee joint involvement was also performed. No intra- or post-operative morbidity, pain worsening or loss of joint motion was observed and all patients were discharged within 48 h. Comparison of the parameters of knee joint evaluation showed a significant reduction of the signs of joint inflammation and a significant increase in the ROM in all follow-up periods. At 36 months, the survival curves showed a 61.2% cumulative probability of clinical remission and 72.8% of definite improvement. No significant differences in the prognostic importance of RA, compared to PsA diagnosis, were observed, although higher percentages of PsA compared to RA knees (86.3% and 45.7%, respectively) reached the end point of clinical remission at 36 months. KJS duration, radiographic severity and cartilage damage were not predictors of poor long-term outcome of AS synovectomy. Surgical AS treatment for PsA knees with more advanced cartilage damage gave a better long-term outcome. A total of 50.7% of operated knees reached the end point of a KJS relapse at 36 months, the majority (82%) within the initial 18 months of follow-up. Our study indicates that AS synovectomy is a safe procedure requiring short hospitalization which, in combination with second-line medical treatment, can reduce local inflammation in RA and PsA KJS, and preserve knee joint ROM for up to 3 yr. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

SUMMARY The potential role of sonography in evaluating the response to therapy of persistent knee joint synovitis (KJS) was assessed in a longitudinal study in pre- and post-arthroscopic (AS) synovectomy in rheumatoid and psoriatic patients. At entry to the study, ultrasound (US) detection of synovial proliferation was compared with arthroscopic visualization as the ‘gold standard’ reference. US joint effusion and synovial thickness measures and predominant patterns of synovial proliferation were recorded by comparing clinical and US indices before and at 2, 6 and 12 months after AS synovectomy, or after KJS relapse up to 24 months. A 12 month survival analysis of clinical and US outcomes of arthroscopic synovectomy was also performed. US detection of morphology and degree of synovial proliferation was correlated with AS macroscopic evaluation. After AS synovectomy, the clinical index and both US joint effusion and synovial thickness were significantly reduced, whereas US patterns of synovial proliferation did not show significant changes. US and clinical indices were significantly correlated in all follow-up measurements and US joint effusion was significantly increased in the relapsed compared with the non-relapsed KJS group. The probability at 12 months of reaching maximum improvement in US joint effusion and synovial thickness outcomes was 99 and 58%, respectively; that for clinical remission of KJS was 72%. Ultrasound evaluation has proven reliable and accurate by the arthroscopic gold standard in detecting changes of rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis knee joint synovitis. The correlation of US with clinical findings in pre- and post-synovectomy patients suggests that sonography can be used as an objective method in monitoring the response to therapy of inflammatory knee joint disease. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Severe asthma affects about 10% of the population with asthma and is characterized by low lung function and a high count of blood leukocytes, mainly eosinophils. Various definitions are used in clinical practice and in the literature to identify asthma remission: clinical remission, inflammatory remission, and complete remission. This work highlights a consensus for asthma remission using a Delphi method. In the context of the Severe Asthma Network Italy, which accounts for 57 severe asthma centers and more than 2,200 patients, a board of six experts drafted a list of candidate statements in a questionnaire, which has been revised to minimize redundancies and ensure clear and consistent wording for the first round (R1) of the analysis. Thirty-two statements were included in the R1 questionnaire and then submitted to a panel of 80 experts, which used a 5-point Likert scale to measure agreement regarding each statement. Then, an interim analysis of R1 data was performed, and items were discussed and considered to produce a consistent questionnaire for round 2 (R2) of the analysis. Then, the board set the R2 questionnaire, which included only important topics. Panelists were asked to vote on the statements in the R2 questionnaire afterward. During R2, the criteria of complete clinical remission (the absence of the need for oral corticosteroids, symptoms, exacerbations or attacks, and pulmonary function stability) and those of partial clinical remission (the absence of the need for oral corticosteroids, and two of three criteria: the absence of symptoms, exacerbations or attacks, and pulmonary stability) were confirmed. This Severe Asthma Network Italy Delphi analysis defined a valuable and independent tool that is easy to use, to test the efficacy of different treatments in patients with severe asthma enrolled into the SANI registry., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Biologics are currently one of the main treatment options for a number of diseases. The IgG4 monoclonal antibody dupilumab targets the Interleukin-4 receptor alpha chain, thus preventing the biological effects of the cytokines IL-4 and IL-13, that are essential for the Th2 response. Several controlled trials showed that dupilumab is effective and safe in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD), severe asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), thus resulting in approval by regulatory agencies. Aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dupilumab in adult patients with CRSwNP stratified by common overlapping comorbid conditions., Methods: We performed a multicenter, observational, prospective study enrolling adult patients with severe CRSwNP who had started dupilumab treatment in the context of standard care from January 2021 to October 2021. Data were collected from twentynine Italian secondary care centers for allergy and clinical immunology, all of which were part of the Italian Society of Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology (SIAAIC). A number of efficacy parameters were used. Patient data were compared using the Wilcoxon test for paired data. All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS version 20 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA)., Results: In total, 82 patients with nasal polyposis were identified. A significant improvement was detected for all the applied efficacy parameters, i.e. 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) and bilateral endoscopic nasal polyp score (NPS) scores for CRSwNP, Rhinitis Control Scoring System (RCSS) and Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) scores for allergic perennial rhinitis, Forced Expiratory Volume in the 1st second (FEV1) and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) scores for asthma, Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) scores for AD. A non-significant improvement was also obtained in the Urticaria Activity Score over 7 days (UAS7) for chronic spontaneous urticaria. Treatment with dupilumab was well tolerated., Conclusions: These data suggest that dupilumab treatment in patients suffering from CRSwNP and associated comorbidities may be suitable. Such outcome, although confirmation by trials is warranted, suggests the possibility to treat different disorders with a single therapy, with favorable effects especially under the cost-effectiveness aspect., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Severe asthma patients are at an increased risk of major complications and they need to be monitored regularly. The COVID-19 pandemic has notably impacted on the health care resources. The telemedicine approach applied to the follow-up of asthmatic patients has been proven to be effective in monitoring their disease and their adherence to the therapy. The aim of our study was to investigate the satisfaction of severe asthma patients before the activation of a telemedicine management, as well as their current experience with self-administration of injection therapy. An ad hoc questionnaire was developed and sent by e-mail to 180 severe asthma patients. Most of subjects, 82%, were confident with the idea of doing self-measurements and self-managing their disease. Further, 77% of subjects favoured to carry out virtual visits and telemedicine. Regarding the home treatment, 93% of patients considered the self-injection therapy easy, 94% of subjects felt safe, and 93% were not worried while self-administering. Only mild adverse events were reported in 22% of patients after self-administration. Our results showed an agreement between what is considered necessary and practicable by healthcare personnel and what is perceived by the severe asthma patients in terms of treatment and monitoring of the disease with Telehealth. Biologics have a safety profile and can be easily self-administred at home.

Background: COVID-19 vaccination has been recommended for severe asthmatics. We aimed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and impact on disease control and patient's quality of life of the mRNA SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 vaccine in severe asthma patients regarding biologic treatment., Methods: Severe asthmatic patients regularly managed by two big allergy and respiratory referral centers were offered to undergo Pfizer COVID 19 vaccination at the hospital site. Patients filled in an adverse events questionnaire after the first and second dose, as well as the Asthma Control Test (ACT) and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ)., Results: Overall, 253 patients were vaccinated; only 16 patients refused. No serious events were detected. Less than 20% of patients reported side effects, most of which were classified as very common side effects. No differences were reported according to the ongoing biologic drug. A significant improvement in both ACT and AQLQ was observed between the first and the second dose administration., Conclusions: Our data confirm the optimal safety and tolerability profile of mRNA SARS- CoV-2/COVID-19 in severe asthma patients on biologic treatment, as well as their positive attitude towards COVID-19 vaccination. The negligible proportion of patients reporting side effects and the absence of asthma exacerbations are relevant to support the COVID-19 vaccination campaign in severe asthma patients worldwide.

Background: Asthma prevalence among COVID-19 patients seems to be surprisingly low. However the clinical profile of COVID-19 asthmatic patients and potential determinants of higher susceptibility/worse outcome have been scarcely investigated. We aimed to describe the prevalence and features of asthmatic patients hospitalized for COVID-19 and to explore the association between their clinical asthma profile and COVID-19 severity., Methods: Medical records of patients admitted to COVID-Units of six Italian cities major hospitals were reviewed. Demographic and clinical data were analyzed and compared according to the COVID-19 outcome (death/need for ventilation vs discharge at home without requiring invasive procedures)., Results: Within the COVID-Units population (n = 2000) asthma prevalence was 2.1%. Among the asthmatics the mean age was 61.1 years and 60% were females. Around half of patients were atopic, blood eosinophilia was normal in most of patients. An asthma exacerbation in the 6 months before the Covid-Unit admittance was reported by 18% of patients. 24% suffered from GINA step 4-5 asthma, and 5% were under biologic treatment. 31% of patients were not on regular treatment and a negligible use of oral steroid was recorded. Within the worse outcome group, a prevalence of males was detected (64 vs 29%, p = 0.026); they suffered from more severe asthma (43 vs 14%, p = 0.040) and were more frequently current or former smokers (62 vs 25%, p = 0.038)., Conclusions: Our report, the first including a large COVID-19 hospitalized Italian population, confirms the low prevalence of asthma. On the other side patients with GINA 4/5 asthma, and those not adequately treated, should be considered at higher risk., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The pandemic COVID-19 abruptly exploded, taking most health professionals around the world unprepared. Italy, the first European country to be hit violently, was forced to activate the lockdown in mid-February 2020. At the time of the spread, a high number of victims were quickly registered, especially in the regions of Northern Italy which have a high rate of highly-polluting production activities. The need to hospitalize the large number of patients with severe forms of COVID-19 led the National Health System to move a large number of specialists from their disciplines to the emergency hospital departments for the treatment of COVID-19. Furthermore, the lockdown itself has limited the possibility for general practitioners and pediatricians to be able to make outpatient visits and/or home care for patients with chronic diseases. Among them, the patient with atopic diseases, such as asthma, rhinitis and atopic dermatitis, is worthy of particular attention as she/he is immersed in a studded negative scenario with the onset of spring, a factor that should not be underestimated for those who suffer from pollen allergy. The Italian Society of Asthma Allergology and Clinical Immunology, to quickly deal with the lack of references and specialist medical procedures, has produced a series of indications for immunologic patient care that are reported in this paper, and can be used as guidelines by specialists of our discipline., Competing Interests: Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests., (© The Author(s) 2020.)

Background: Although blood eosinophils are currently recognized as the main clinical marker of TH2-type inflammation, their relevance in identifying asthma severity remains a matter of debate., Methods: Our retrospective real-life study on severe asthmatics included in the NEONet Italian database aimed to investigate the relevance of blood eosinophil count and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) in the clinical assessment of severe asthma and their role as potential predictors of responsiveness to anti-IgE therapy. The cut-off values chosen were 300 eosinophils/mm3 and FeNO of 30 ppm., Results: We evaluated 132 adult patients. No significant differences were observed between the groups (high and low baseline eosinophil counts) in terms of demographic data, total IgE, lung function, patient-reported outcomes, or nasal comorbidities. The Asthma Control Test score and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire scores were poorer in patients with FeNO ≥30 ppb than in patients with FeNO <30 ppb. In the high FeNO subgroup, more frequent hospital admissions and a higher number of working days lost in the previous year were registered. A combined score including both eosinophils and FeNO did not improve the accuracy of the individual parameters. In the high-eosinophil subgroup, the proportion of responders to omalizumab was greater and increased at each follow-up time point., Conclusions: Our findings show that blood eosinophil count is not an unequivocal marker of asthma severity, whereas a higher FeNO level is associated with more frequent hospital admissions and more working days lost. Blood eosinophils seem to act as a predictor of response to omalizumab.

Background : Few studies have provided real-world evidence of mepolizumab efficacy and safety. We aimed to evaluate mepolizumab for severe eosinophilic asthma in daily clinical practice. Research design and methods : Patients included in the RINOVA (Interdisciplinary Network for the management of severe asthma in Veneto region, Italy) database were investigated. Blood eosinophil count, forced expiratory volume in 1 second, % of predicted (FEV1%), fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), asthma control test (ACT), oral steroid (OCS) intake, and exacerbation rate were evaluated during mepolizumab treatment. Results : 69 patients were enrolled (mean age: 55.1 years; 60.9% females). A significant improvement was detected at one month with respect to blood eosinophils (median level at baseline: 710/μl; -620/μl, p < 0,001), FEV1% (median value at baseline 87; range: 79-101; +4, p = 0.001) and ACT (median value at baseline 18; range: 14-20.5;+4, <0.001). A significant reduction of FeNO was observed six months after the treatment start, when the exacerbation rate and the mean OCS dose significantly decreased (respectively: Δ reduction -3; p < 0.001 and -5 mg; p < 0.001). Conclusions : Our study provides real-world evidence of mepolizumab safety and confirms its dramatic steroid sparing effect. The greatest clinical change (ACT and FEV1) was observed within the first month.