Search

Cancer, characterized by uncontrolled cell proliferation, poses a major global health threat, as evident in the 2022 World Health Organization-International Agency for Research on Cancer report, recording 20 million new cases and 9.7 million deaths worldwide. Thailand alone reported 183,000 new cases and 118,000 fatalities, underscoring the need for tailored prevention, early detection, and treatment strategies. Conventional therapies like surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy, while effective in early stages, face limitations in advanced cases, prompting the development of targeted therapies and immunotherapy, notably chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy. CAR T cell therapy employs genetic engineering to create receptors recognizing cancer-specific antigens. Despite successes in hematological malignancies, challenges such as toxicities, relapse, and high costs persist. Ongoing research, led by the Siriraj Center of Research Excellence for Cancer Immunotherapy (SiCORE-CIT), focuses on advancing fourth- and fifth-generation CAR T cell technologies. SiCORE-CIT's fourth-generation CAR T cells exhibit potent anti-tumor activity against various cancers, surpassing second-generation counterparts. The innovative fifth-generation "Siriraj fifth-generation CAR T cells" secrete anti-PD-L1 scFv, showing potential for diverse cancer applications, highlighting the transformative impact of ongoing research. Successful applications of fifth-generation CAR T cells in B-cell leukemia, lymphoma, and multiple myeloma underscore their transformative potential. This emphasizes the critical role of continuous research in refining therapeutic approaches for both hematologic and solid malignancies. The ongoing exploration and development in this domain have the potential to revolutionize cancer treatment paradigms, significantly contributing to alleviating the global health burden associated with this complex disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Autoimmune diseases (ADs) are characterized by loss of immune tolerance, high chronicity, with substantial morbidity and mortality, despite conventional immunosuppression (IS) or targeted disease modifying therapies (DMTs), which usually require repeated administration. Recently, novel cellular therapies (CT), including mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC), Chimeric Antigen Receptors T cells (CART) and regulatory T cells (Tregs), have been successfully adopted in ADs. An international expert panel of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation and the International Society for the Cell and Gene Therapy, reviewed all available evidence, based on the current literature and expert practices, on use of MSC, CART and Tregs, in AD patients with rheumatological, neurological, and gastroenterological indications. Expert-based consensus and recommendations for best practice and quality of patient care were developed to support clinicians, scientists, and their multidisciplinary teams, as well as patients and care providers and will be regularly updated.

The Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T Cell Safety Database Project explored the use of cross-study safety data to identify risk factors associated with severe cytokine release syndrome (sCRS) and severe neurological toxicities (sNTX) after CAR T cell administration. Sponsors voluntarily submitted data for 1,926 subjects from 17 phases 1 and 2 studies (six acute lymphocytic leukemia [ALL], five non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma [NHL], and six multiple myeloma [MM] studies). Subjects with ALL had a higher risk for developing sCRS and sNTX compared with subjects with NHL or MM. Subjects who received CAR T cells produced with gammaretrovirus vectors including CD28 sequences had higher rates of sNTX compared with subjects who received products produced with other vector designs included in the database. Use of cytokine-directed therapies and corticosteroids at lower toxicity grades were associated with lower rates of sCRS. Although this exploratory study was limited by unadjusted cross-study comparisons, it independently reproduced known risk factors for CAR T cell toxicity. Findings provide stakeholders in the CAR T cell clinical development community information on safety trends for consideration in early phase clinical trial design, as well as avenues for additional research.

Summary: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells targeting CD19 represent a promising salvage immunotherapy for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL), offering ~40% of long‐term responses. In everyday clinical practice, haematologists involved in CAR T cell treatment of patients with R/R DLBCL have to deal with diagnostically complex cases and difficult therapeutic choices. The availability of novel immunotherapeutic agents for R/R DLBCL and recent advances in understanding CAR T‐cell failure mechanisms demand a rational approach to identify the best choice for bridging therapy and managing post‐CAR T‐cell therapy relapses. Moreover, positron emission tomography/computerised tomography may result in false‐positive interpretation, highlighting the importance of post‐treatment biopsy. In this review, we discuss all above issues, presenting four instructive cases, with the aim to provide criteria and new perspectives for CAR T‐cell treatment of DLBCL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the year 2021, there were three new Food and Drug Administration approvals for all leukemia types: asciminib (Scemblix) for chronic myeloid leukemia, brexucabtagene autoleucel (Tecartus) for relapsed/refractory B‐cell acute lymphocytic leukemia, and asparaginase erwinia chrysanthemi (recombinant)‐rywn (Rylaze) for acute lymphocytic leukemia. This is down from 2017–2018 when eight new therapies were approved for acute myeloid leukemia alone. However, this decrease from prior years does not imply that little progress was made in our understanding or treatment of leukemias in 2021. Asciminib and brexucabtagene autoleucel, in particular, are representative of major developing trends. Asciminib, a targeted therapy, is only one of many drugs in development that are products of a bedside‐to‐bench approach fueled by new sequencing and other genetic technologies that have greatly increased our understanding of the biology behind hematologic diseases. Brexucabtagene autoleucel, an adoptive cell therapy, is the newest of several similar treatments for B cell–associated neoplasms, and it is representative of a massive push to develop novel immunotherapies for a broad range of hematologic malignancies. This commentary reviews the development of asciminib and brexucabtagene autoleucel and describes other major advances in the associated fields of targeted therapy and immunotherapy for leukemias. Significant advances were made in the field of leukemia in 2021. Asciminib, brexucabtagene autoleucel, and asparaginase erwinia chrysanthemi were all approved for various indications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy represents a scientific breakthrough in the treatment of advanced hematological malignancies. It relies on cell engineering to direct the powerful cytotoxic T-cell activity toward tumor cells. Nevertheless, these highly powerful cell therapies can trigger substantial toxicities such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune cell-associated neurological syndrome (ICANS). These potentially fatal side effects are now better understood and managed in the clinic but still require intensive patient follow-up and management. Some specific mechanisms seem associated with the development of ICANS, such as cytokine surge caused by activated CAR-T cells, off-tumor targeting of CD19, and vascular leak. Therapeutic tools are being developed aiming at obtaining better control of toxicity. In this review, we focus on the current understanding of ICANS, novel findings, and current gaps. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common malignant primary brain tumor, known for its poor prognosis and high recurrence rate. Current standard of care includes surgical resection followed by combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Although immunotherapies have yielded promising results in hematological malignancies, their successful application in GBM remains limited due to a host of immunosuppressive factors unique to GBM. As a result of these roadblocks, research efforts have focused on utilizing combinatorial immunotherapies that target networks of immune processes in GBM with promising results in both preclinical and clinical trials, although limitations in overcoming the immunosuppressive factors within GBM remain. In this review, we aim to discuss the intrinsic and adaptive immune resistance unique to GBM and to summarize the current evidence and outcomes of engineered and non-engineered treatments targeted at overcoming GBM resistance to immunotherapy. Additionally, we aim to highlight the most promising strategies of targeted GBM immunotherapy combinatorial treatments and the insights that may directly improve the current patient prognosis and clinical care.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy represents a scientific breakthrough in the treatment of advanced hematological malignancies. It relies on cell engineering to direct the powerful cytotoxic T-cell activity toward tumor cells. Nevertheless, these highly powerful cell therapies can trigger substantial toxicities such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune cell-associated neurological syndrome (ICANS). These potentially fatal side effects are now better understood and managed in the clinic but still require intensive patient follow-up and management. Some specific mechanisms seem associated with the development of ICANS, such as cytokine surge caused by activated CAR-T cells, off-tumor targeting of CD19, and vascular leak. Therapeutic tools are being developed aiming at obtaining better control of toxicity. In this review, we focus on the current understanding of ICANS, novel findings, and current gaps.

Combining chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells with oncolytic viruses (OVs) has recently emerged as a promising treatment approach in preclinical studies that aim to alleviate some of the barriers faced by CAR-T cell therapy. In this study, we address by means of mathematical modeling the main question of whether a single dose or multiple sequential doses of CAR-T cells during the OVs therapy can have a synergetic effect on tumor reduction. To that end, we propose an ordinary differential equations-based model with virus-induced synergism to investigate potential effects of different regimes that could result in efficacious combination therapy against tumor cell populations. Model simulations show that, while the treatment with a single dose of CAR-T cells is inadequate to eliminate all tumor cells, combining the same dose with a single dose of OVs can successfully eliminate the tumor in the absence of virus-induced synergism. However, in the presence of virus-induced synergism, the same combination therapy fails to eliminate the tumor. Furthermore, it is shown that if the intensity of virus-induced synergy and/or virus oncolytic potency is high, then the induced CAR-T cell response can inhibit virus oncolysis. Additionally, the simulations show a more robust synergistic effect on tumor cell reduction when OVs and CAR-T cells are administered simultaneously compared to the combination treatment where CAR-T cells are administered first or after OV injection. Our findings suggest that the combination therapy of CAR-T cells and OVs seems unlikely to be effective if the virus-induced synergistic effects are included when genetically engineering oncolytic viral vectors.

Central nervous system (CNS) tumors are the most common solid malignancy in the pediatric population. Based on adoptive cellular therapy's clinical success against childhood leukemia and the preclinical efficacy against pediatric CNS tumors, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells offer hope of improving outcomes for recurrent tumors and universally fatal diseases such as diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG). However, a major obstacle for tumors of the brain and spine is ineffective T cell chemotaxis to disease sites. Locoregional CAR T cell delivery via infusion through an intracranial catheter is currently under study in multiple early phase clinical trials. Here, we describe the Seattle Children's single-institution experience including the multidisciplinary process for the preparation of successful, repetitive intracranial T cell infusion for children and the catheter-related safety of our 307 intracranial CAR T cell doses.

The success of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy in solid tumors, unlike in hematologic malignancies, is limited by inadequate tumor infiltration and T cell dysfunction and exhaustion. Regional delivery of CAR T cells in patients with solid tumors is safe and feasible; promotes infiltration, proliferation, and trafficking; and ignites functionally persisting systemic immunity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Besides common therapeutic approaches, such as surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, novel therapeutic approaches, including immunotherapy, have been an advent in CRC treatment. The immunotherapy approaches try to elicit patients` immune responses against tumor cells to eradicate the tumor. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells are two branches of cancer immunotherapy. MAbs demonstrate the great ability to completely recognize cancer cell-surface receptors and blockade proliferative or inhibitory pathways. On the other hand, T cell activation by genetically engineered CAR receptor via the TCR/CD3 and costimulatory domains can induce potent immune responses against specific tumor-associated antigens (TAAs). Both of these approaches have beneficial anti-tumor effects on CRC. Herein, we review the different mAbs against various pathways and their applications in clinical trials, the different types of CAR-T cells, various specific CAR-T cells against TAAs, and their clinical use in CRC treatment.

Aims: The purpose of this study was to design and manufacture CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)‐modified T cells for clinical use in Thailand, as a model for how this technology can be directly applied at individual institutions treating high‐risk leukemia patients. Methods: We constructed second‐generation CAR T cells expressing CD19 scFV‐CD28‐CD3ζ with different lengths of the spacer region: full, intermediate, and short length, by using a lentiviral vector. We wanted to determine whether the difference in length of the spacer would affect the cytotoxic potential of the CD19 CAR T cells against the leukemic cells. Results: We found that all constructs of CD19 CAR T cells exhibited a similar level of cytotoxicity against several human lymphoma and leukemia cell lines. For the clinical application, we chose the intermediate length spacer construct CD19 CAR T cells, hypothesizing that the highest transduction efficiency coupled with a slower initial proliferation in vitro might lead to effective leukemic cell kill, yet a lower probability for serious clinical side effects. We then tested the clinical efficacy of our CD19 CAR T cells in one patient with refractory/relapsed acute B‐cell lymphoblastic leukemia. This patient indeed had minimal clinical side effects after the CAR T‐cell infusion, and he remains in an unmaintained, ongoing complete remission 10+ months after his T‐cell treatment. Conclusion: Our CD19 CAR T cells demonstrated efficacies in acute lymphoblastic B‐cell leukemia, and will be used to establish an immunotherapeutic program for high‐risk B‐cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia in Thailand. We propose that this approach can be used as a model for how this new exciting technology can be applied directly at individual institutions that treat (a large number of) patients with high‐risk leukemia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T‐cell therapy is a promising immunotherapeutic treatment concept that is changing the treatment approach to hematologic malignancies. The development of CAR T‐cell therapy represents a prime example for the successful bench‐to‐bedside translation of advances in immunology and cellular therapy into clinical practice. The currently available CAR T‐cell products have shown high response rates and long‐term remissions in patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia and relapsed/refractory lymphoma. However, CAR T‐cell therapy can induce severe life‐threatening toxicities such as cytokine release syndrome, neurotoxicity, or infection, which require rapid and aggressive medical treatment in the intensive care unit setting. In this review, the authors provide an overview of the state‐of‐the‐art in the clinical management of severe life‐threatening events in CAR T‐cell recipients. Furthermore, key challenges that have to be overcome to maximize the safety of CAR T cells are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Despite improvements in the outcomes of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), traditional therapies (including hematopoietic stem cell transplant) often still fail. Antigen-specific immunotherapies for the treatment of ALL such as monoclonal antibodies, antibody–drug conjugates, bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTEs), and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells have demonstrated remarkable clinical efficacy and are rapidly evolving. With indisputable activity in patients with relapsed or refractory ALL, efforts now hope to integrate these agents into earlier phases of treatment. In this review, we will discuss the available antibody and cellular-based immunotherapies for the treatment of patients with ALL and provide a clinical and biologic framework with which to inform treatment approaches. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Genetically engineered T cells have become an important therapy for B-cell malignancies. Measuring the efficiency of vector integration into the T cell genome is important for assessing the potency and safety of these cancer immunotherapies. Methods A digital droplet polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) assay was developed and evaluated for assessing the average number of lenti- and retroviral vectors integrated into Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) and T Cell Receptor (TCR)-engineered T cells. Results The ddPCR assay consistently measured the concentration of an empty vector in solution and the average number of CAR and TCR vectors integrated into T cell populations. There was a linear relationship between the average vector copy number per cell measured by ddPCR and the proportion of cells transduced as measured by flow cytometry. Similar vector copy number measurements were obtained by different staff using the ddPCR assay, highlighting the assays reproducibility among technicians. Analysis of fresh and cryopreserved CAR T and TCR engineered T cells yielded similar results. Conclusions ddPCR is a robust tool for accurate quantitation of average vector copy number in CAR and TCR engineered T cells. The assay is also applicable to other types of genetically engineered cells including Natural Killer cells and hematopoietic stem cells.

As the field of cancer therapeutics moves increasingly toward targeted and cellular therapies, this evolution comes with new hurdles. Toxicity of these therapies can result in serious adverse events that can become life‐threatening. In particular, cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell‐associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) are now the most common adverse effects resulting from chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T‐cell therapy. Furthermore, CAR T cells are reported to cause hyperactivation of macrophages, which in extreme cases results in hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH). These toxic effects result from cytokines released as a direct effect of the therapy. Physicians are evaluating inflammatory markers to monitor longitudinally cytokine stimulation and immune activation after therapy, which can help predict and gauge the severity of the cytokine storm. Prompt recognition of toxic effects and rapid intervention are essential in the management of patients receiving CAR T‐cell therapy. Despite intervention, some patients still experience severe and prolonged ICANS. Herein we present a patient with lymphoma who developed prolonged ICANS and reviewed the literature on neurotoxicity and macrophage activation resulting from CD19‐directed CAR T‐cell therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is a highly effective new treatment for relapsed and refractory hematological cancers but is associated with the novel treatment-limiting toxicities of cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity. Neurotoxicity, now more commonly referred to as immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), is a clinical and neuropsychiatric syndrome that can occur in the days to weeks following CAR T-cell and other T-cell-engaging therapies. While the clinical characteristics of ICANS have been well described, its pathophysiology is poorly understood, and best treatment and preventive strategies remain elusive. Clinical trial experience and animal models suggest a central role for endothelial cell dysfunction, myeloid cells, blood-brain barrier disruption, and elevated central nervous system cytokine levels in the development of ICANS. Here we discuss ICANS incidence, clinical features, risk factors, biomarkers, pathophysiology, and grading and management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Besides common therapeutic approaches, such as surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, novel therapeutic approaches, including immunotherapy, have been an advent in CRC treatment. The immunotherapy approaches try to elicit patients' immune responses against tumor cells to eradicate the tumor. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells are two branches of cancer immunotherapy. MAbs demonstrate the great ability to completely recognize cancer cell-surface receptors and blockade proliferative or inhibitory pathways. On the other hand, T cell activation by genetically engineered CAR receptor via the TCR/CD3 and costimulatory domains can induce potent immune responses against specific tumor-associated antigens (TAAs). Both of these approaches have beneficial anti-tumor effects on CRC. Herein, we review the different mAbs against various pathways and their applications in clinical trials, the different types of CAR-T cells, various specific CAR-T cells against TAAs, and their clinical use in CRC treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells directed against the B-cell marker CD19 are currently changing the landscape for treatment of patients with refractory and/or relapsed B-cell malignancies. Due to the nature of CAR T cells as living drugs, they display a unique toxicity profile. As CAR T-cell therapy is extending towards other diseases and being more broadly employed in hematology and oncology, optimal management strategies of side-effects associated with CAR T-cell therapy are of high relevance. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), and cytopenias constitute challenges in the treatment of patients with CAR T cells. This review summarizes the current understanding of CAR T-cell toxicity and its management. • CAR T cells are associated with unique side-effects. • Cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) and cytopenias are common. • Understanding the presentation, pathophysiology, grading and management of side-effects is crucial for CAR T-cell safety. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) is a disease with a very poor outcome and remains an area of significant unmet need, necessitating novel therapeutic strategies. The progress made in the field of immunotherapy, in particular chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-engineered T cells, has given rise to many hopes for pathologies such as B cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia and B cell lymphoma, and many studies have attempted to translate these successes to AML. This review summarises the recent advances in, and defines an ideal target for, CAR T cell therapy in AML.

Abstract Background Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells have shown promise in the treatment of B cell acute lymphocytic leukemia (B-ALL). However, its efficacy in B-ALL patients with extramedullary involvement is limited due to poor responses and neurotoxicity. Here, we utilized a third generation of CAR T cell vector, which contains the Toll/interleukin-1 receptor (ITR) domain of Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2), to generate 1928zT2 T cells targeting CD19, and evaluated the efficacy of 1928zT2 T cells in relapse or refractory B-ALL patients with extramedullary involvement. Methods 1928zT2 T cells were generated by 19-28z-TLR2 lentiviral vector transfection into primary human T lymphocytes. The anti-leukemia effect of 1928zT2 T cells were determined by killing assays and in xenografts. Three patients diagnosed as relapse or refractory ALL with extramedullary involvement were infused with 1928zT2 T cells, and the clinical responses were evaluated by BM smear, B-ultrasonography, PET/CT, histology, flow cytometry, qPCR, ELISA, and luminex assay. Results 1928zT2 T cells exhibited enhanced effector function against CD19+ leukemic cells in vitro and in a xenograft model of human extramedullary leukemia. Notably, the 1928zT2 T cells eradicated extramedullary leukemia and induced complete remission in the three relapse and refractory ALL patients without serious adverse effects. 1928zT2 T cells expanded robustly in the circulation of these three patients and were detected in the cerebrospinal fluid of patient 3. These three patients experienced cytokine release syndrome (CRS) with grade 2 or 3, which remitted spontaneously or after tocilizumab treatment. None of the three patients suffered neurotoxicity or needed further intensive care. Conclusions Our results demonstrate that 1928zT2 T cells with TLR2 incorporation augment anti-leukemic effects, particularly for eradicating extramedullary leukemia cells, and suggest that the infusion of 1928zT2 T cells is an encouraging treatment for relapsed/refractory ALL patients with extramedullary involvement. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02822326. Date of registration: July 4, 2016.

Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T cell therapy is a promising form of adoptive cell therapy that re-engineers patient-derived T cells to express a hybrid receptor specific to a tumour-specific antigen of choice. Many well-characterised tumour antigens are intracellular and therefore not accessible to antibodies at the cell surface. Therefore, the ability to target peptide-MHC tumour targets with antibodies is key for wider applicability of CAR T cell therapy in cancer. One way to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of ligating tumour target cells is studying the immune synapse. Here we generated a second-generation CAR to targeting the HLA-A*02:01 restricted H3.3K27M epitope, identified as a possible therapeutic target in ~75% of diffuse midline gliomas, used as a model antigen to study the immune synapse. The pMHCI-specific CAR demonstrated specificity, potent activation, cytokine secretion and cytotoxic function. Furthermore, we characterised killing kinetics using live cell imaging as well as CAR synapse confocal imaging. Here we provide evidence of robust CAR targeting of a model peptide-MHC antigen and that, in contrast to protein-specific CARs, these CARs form a TCR-like immune synapse which facilitates TCR-like killing kinetics.

• CAR T cells might be a salvage option for lymphoma relapse after alloHCT. • Information on CAR T cells in B cell lymphoma after a prior alloHCT is limited. • After prior alloHCT, CD19 CAR T cell treatment in lymphoma is feasible and effective. • CAR T cells did not induce or exacerbate the risk of acute or chronic GVHD. • Protracted cytopenia after CAR T cell treatment is a matter of concern. Although CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells have been successfully used after a preceding allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloHCT) in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, little is known about the feasibility and outcome of CAR T cell treatment in patients who have been previously allotransplanted for lymphoma. In a single-center retrospective analysis, course and outcome of all allografted patients treated with CD19 CAR constructs for B cell lymphoma between October 2018 and November 2019 were studied. CAR therapy consisted either of a third-generation CAR (HD-CAR-1) or of commercially manufactured axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel; Gilead, Santa Monica, U.S.). Altogether, 10 CAR T cell dosings using recipient leukapheresis products were performed in 8 patients: 4 patients (2 mantle cell lymphoma, 2 chronic lymphocytic leukemia) received 6 dosings with HD-CAR-1 and 4 patients (all with diffuse large B cell lymphoma) received 4 dosings with axi-cel. Overall, 6 of 8 patients (75%) responded. CAR treatment was well tolerated with grade ≥ 3 cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity each being observed after 1 of 10 dosings. A single patient had moderate chronic graft-versus-host disease. Of note, 3 of 4 patients who received axi-cel had ongoing grade ≥ 3 cytopenia 3 months postdosing, whereas prolonged cytopenia was not observed in 9 alloHCT-naive patients who received axi-cel during the same time period. In conclusion, CAR T cell treatment from recipient-derived leukapheresis products after a prior alloHCT appears to be feasible, effective, and safe in patients with B cell lymphoma. Protracted cytopenia after axi-cel treatment is a matter of concern and requires further exploration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Establishing a quality program for immune effector cell (IEC) therapy requires a multidisciplinary approach. • Considerations such as standardization of patient care management and data management are crucial for a new IEC quality program. • IEC quality programs must align accreditation and federal requirements with institutional policies. • Auditing and reporting are essential elements of IEC quality programs. As the world of cellular therapy expands to include immune effector cell (IEC) products such as commercial chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells, quality management (QM) professionals are faced with creating either new IEC stand-alone programs or expand existing hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) programs to promote patient safety and be aligned with quality, regulatory, and accreditation requirements. The team professionals at City of Hope (COH) recently expanded the quality HCT program to include IEC products and, in doing so, implemented new regulatory infrastructure while maintaining high quality patient care. At COH, we developed the quality structure of our cellular therapy program through collaborations between quality, regulatory, and CAR T patient care committees, which included physicians and nurse coordinators. To ensure the quality of our program, we monitor data collection and reporting, perform quarterly proactive audits of, for example, outcome analysis, and measure selected end-points for benchmarking purposes. QM professionals play a critical role in the monitoring and evaluation processes and provide guidance on how to implement accreditation requirements and what impact the requirements may have on care management. Here we describe the process by which COH expanded our HCT QM program to include IEC therapy. We share examples of how we developed our overall program structure and other key items such as how we addressed patient care management and accreditation to apprise other programs that wish to create and/or expand existing programs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Genetically engineered T cells have become an important therapy for B-cell malignancies. Measuring the efficiency of vector integration into the T cell genome is important for assessing the potency and safety of these cancer immunotherapies.Methods: A digital droplet polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) assay was developed and evaluated for assessing the average number of lenti- and retroviral vectors integrated into Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) and T Cell Receptor (TCR)-engineered T cells.Results: The ddPCR assay consistently measured the concentration of an empty vector in solution and the average number of CAR and TCR vectors integrated into T cell populations. There was a linear relationship between the average vector copy number per cell measured by ddPCR and the proportion of cells transduced as measured by flow cytometry. Similar vector copy number measurements were obtained by different staff using the ddPCR assay, highlighting the assays reproducibility among technicians. Analysis of fresh and cryopreserved CAR T and TCR engineered T cells yielded similar results.Conclusions: ddPCR is a robust tool for accurate quantitation of average vector copy number in CAR and TCR engineered T cells. The assay is also applicable to other types of genetically engineered cells including Natural Killer cells and hematopoietic stem cells. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cancer immunotherapies, including checkpoint inhibitors and adoptive cell therapy, manipulate the immune system to recognize and attack cancer cells. These therapies have the potential to induce durable responses in multiple solid and hematologic malignancies and thus have transformed treatment algorithms for numerous tumor types. Cancer immunotherapies lead to unique toxicity profiles distinct from the toxicities of other cancer therapies, depending on their mechanism of action. These toxicities often require specific management, which can include steroids and immune-modulating therapy and for which consensus guidelines have been published. This review will focus on the toxicities of checkpoint inhibitors and chimeric antigen receptor T cells, including pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of Zhejiang University: Science B is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Autoimmune diseases (ADs) are characterized by loss of immune tolerance, high chronicity, with substantial morbidity and mortality, despite conventional immunosuppression (IS) or targeted disease modifying therapies (DMTs), which usually require repeated administration. Recently, novel cellular therapies (CT), including mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC), Chimeric Antigen Receptors T cells (CART) and regulatory T cells (Tregs), have been successfully adopted in ADs. An international expert panel of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation and the International Society for the Cell and Gene Therapy, reviewed all available evidence, based on the current literature and expert practices, on use of MSC, CART and Tregs, in AD patients with rheumatological, neurological, and gastroenterological indications. Expert-based consensus and recommendations for best practice and quality of patient care were developed to support clinicians, scientists, and their multidisciplinary teams, as well as patients and care providers and will be regularly updated., Competing Interests: RG discloses speaking honoraria from Biotest, Pfizer, Medac, Neovii and Magenta. TA received study support from Amgen, Janssen and honoraria from Neovii, GSK, Astra-Zeneca, Abbvie. FM received honoraria & travel support from BMS, Janssen, Gilead, Miltenyi, Novartis, Astra-Zeneca, Biontech, received research support from Gilead, and discloses advisory board from Biontech. JAS discloses consultancy for Vertex, Medac and Jazz, and advisory board from Kiadis. PA discloses study support by NIHR, payment for expert testimony by Pinsent Mason and Bugge Valentin and consulting to Cellerys AG. RS discloses speaking honoraria from Novartis and Gilead. CCL received travel support for attending meeting by Gilead and discloses consultancy for Nektar Therapeutics and Gilead. FSG received study support from Novartis and Gilead, speaking honoraria from Astra-Zeneca and travel support from Abbvie, Gilead and Pierre-Fabre. FO discloses speaking honoraria from Takeda, Medac, Kyowa Kirin, Menarini-Stemline, and travel support from Medac, Jazz and Janssen. JOL received study support from Abbvie, Gilead, Takeda, consultancy & honoraria from AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Celtrion, Engytix, Ferring, Galapagos, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Shire, Takeda, travel support by Abbvie, Takeda, Celltrion. AM received study support from Kyverna, Miltenyi and honoraria from Miltenyi, and participated to advisory board from Century Therapeutics. RC discloses speaking honoraria from GSK, AstraZeneca, Werfen, Rubió, Eli-Lilly, Pfizer. IYA discloses speaking honoraria from Kite, Novartis and BMS. None of the mentioned conflicts of interest were related to financing of the content of this manuscript. The remaining authors have nothing to declare., (© 2024 The Author(s).)

Background: CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells have substantial benefit in the treatment of patients with B-cell malignancies. However, despite encouraging therapeutic efficiency, there is limited overall response rate when anti-CD19 CAR-T cells are used to treat patients with relapsed and refractory (R/R) B cell lymphomas. Therefore, it further investigation is urgently needed to improve treatment efficacy. Method: A combined treatment protocol of CAR-T cell with decitabine (DAC) to treat B cell lymphoma was developed and tested on lymphoma cell lines first, and then efficacy and the underlying mechanism were investigated. After ethical approval was granted, the combined treatment protocol was applied to treat two patients with R/R B-cell lymphomas. Results: CAR-T cells were prepared successfully, and they recognized CD19 antigen expressed on lymphoma cell lines specifically. Cell-line studies also showed that CD19 antigen expression was increased by DAC pretreatment, and the function of CAR-T cells was not compromised. The cell-line study further demonstrated that lymphoma cells pretreated by DAC responded more to the treatment of CAR-T cells. Two patients with R/R B cell lymphoma were pretreated with DAC then treated with CAR-T, and both achieved complete remission (CR). Conclusions: The epigenetic modifying drug DAC increases expression of the surface antigen CD19 on lymphoma cells. The DAC pretreatment protocol may lead patients with B cell lymphoma to be more susceptible to adoptive transfer of anti-CD19 CAR-T cells treKeywordsatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is an effective new treatment for hematologic malignancies. Two CAR T-cell products are now approved for clinical use by the U.S. FDA: tisagenlecleucel for pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and adult diffuse large B-cell lymphoma subtypes (DLBCL), and axicabtagene ciloleucel for DLBCL. CAR T-cell therapies are being developed for multiple myeloma, and clear evidence of clinical activity has been generated. A barrier to widespread use of CAR T-cell therapy is toxicity, primarily cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurologic toxicity. Manifestations of CRS include fevers, hypotension, hypoxia, end organ dysfunction, cytopenias, coagulopathy, and hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Neurologic toxicities are diverse and include encephalopathy, cognitive defects, dysphasias, seizures, and cerebral edema. Our understanding of the pathophysiology of CRS and neurotoxicity is continually improving. Early and peak levels of certain cytokines, peak blood CAR T-cell levels, patient disease burden, conditioning chemotherapy, CAR T-cell dose, endothelial activation, and CAR design are all factors that may influence toxicity. Multiple grading systems for CAR T-cell toxicity are in use; a universal grading system is needed so that CAR T-cell products can be compared across studies. Guidelines for toxicity management vary among centers, but typically include supportive care, plus immunosuppression with tocilizumab or corticosteroids administered for severe toxicity. Gaining a better understanding of CAR T-cell toxicities and developing new therapies for these toxicities are active areas of laboratory research. Further clinical investigation of CAR T-cell toxicity is also needed. In this review, we present guidelines for management of CRS and CAR neurotoxicity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Immunotherapy, including chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, cancer vaccines, and dendritic cell therapy, has been incorporated as a fifth modality of modern cancer care, along with surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, and target therapy. Among them, CAR T-cell therapy emerges as one of the most promising treatments. In 2017, the first two CAR T-cell drugs, tisagenlecleucel and axicabtagene ciloleucel for B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), respectively, were approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). In addition to the successful applications to hematological malignancies, CAR T-cell therapy has been investigated to potentially treat solid tumors, including pediatric brain tumor, which serves as the leading cause of cancer-associated death for children and adolescents. However, the employment of CAR T-cell therapy in pediatric brain tumors still faces multiple challenges, such as CAR T-cell transportation and expansion through the blood–brain barrier, and identification of the specific target antigen on the tumor surface and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Nevertheless, encouraging outcomes in both clinical and preclinical trials are coming to light. In this article, we outline the current propitious progress and discuss the obstacles needed to be overcome in order to unveil a new era of treatment in pediatric brain tumors.

The use of messenger RNA (mRNA) in gene therapy is increasing in recent years, due to its unique features compared to plasmid DNA: Transient expression, no need to enter into the nucleus and no risk of insertional mutagenesis. Nevertheless, the clinical application of mRNA as a therapeutic tool is limited by its instability and ability to activate immune responses; hence, mRNA chemical modifications together with the design of suitable vehicles result essential. This manuscript includes a revision of the strategies employed to enhance in vitro transcribed (IVT) mRNA functionality and efficacy, including the optimization of its stability and translational efficiency, as well as the regulation of its immunostimulatory properties. An overview of the nanosystems designed to protect the mRNA and to overcome the intra and extracellular barriers for successful delivery is also included. Finally, the present and future applications of mRNA nanomedicines for immunization against infectious diseases and cancer, protein replacement, gene editing, and regenerative medicine are highlighted.

Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common hematologic malignancy and represents approximately 10% of all hematological neoplasms. Standard therapy consists of induction therapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or, if ASCT cannot be performed, standard doublet, triplet, or quadruplet, novel agent-containing induction treatment until progression. Although MM is still regarded as mostly incurable by current standards, the development of several novel compounds, combination therapies, and immunotherapy approaches has raised great hopes about transforming MM into an indolent, chronic disease and possibly achieving a cure for individual patients. Several new inhibitory and immunological agents have been approved or are under intensive investigation and may lead to new therapeutic options for patients with relapsed/refractory MM, for patients ineligible for ASCT, and for patients after ASCT. Especially in the field of immunotherapy, including monoclonal antibodies, checkpoint inhibition, and chimeric antigen receptor T cells, current advances are rapid and highly promising. This review aims to summarize the newest and most promising immunotherapeutic agents for MM, their clinical efficacy, their adverse event (AE) profiles, and the ways in which these AEs can best be overcome or avoided. Cancer 2018;124:2075-85. © 2018 American Cancer Society. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cancer-initiating cells (CICs) represent a relatively rare subpopulation of cells endowed with self-renewal, stemness properties, tumorigenicity in immunodeficient mice, and resistance to standard therapies as well as to immunotherapy. Here, we review the biological and immunological characteristics of CICs with special focus on the immunomodulating mechanisms they utilize to escape from immunosurveillance. The recently developed immunotherapeutic strategies have yielded remarkable clinical results in many types of tumors, indicating that indeed a patient’s immune system can mount an immune response, which is effective in controlling tumor growth. However, a high proportion of patients is resistant or acquires resistance to these therapeutic strategies. The latter findings may reflect, at least in some cases, the inability of the immunotherapeutic strategies used to eradicate CICs. The CICs that escape immune recognition and destruction may give rise to new tumors in the same organ site or through the metastatic colonization in other anatomic sites. Identification of novel therapeutic approaches that can eradicate CICs is a major challenge in the cancer therapy area. An improved understanding of the interactions of CICs with immune system and with tumor microenvironment may contribute to optimize the available therapies and to design novel combination treatments for cancer therapy. Abbreviations: ALDH, aldehyde dehydrogenase; APC, antigen-presenting cells; APM, antigen-processing machinery; CAR: chimeric antigen receptor; CHK1, checkpoint serine/threonine protein kinase; CIC, cancer-initiating cell; CRC, colorectal cancer; CTLA-4, cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4; GBM, glioblastoma multiforme; GDF-15, growth differentiation factor-15; CSPG4: chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan-4; IFN, interferon; IL-4, interleukin-4; IL-10, interleukin-10; IL-13, interleukin-13; IL-13α2, α2 chain of IL-13 receptor; mAb, monoclonal antibody; MDSC, myeloid-derived suppressor cell; MHC, major histocompatibility complex; PD-1, programmed death-1; PD-L1 programmed death ligand-1; PDK, 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase-1; PGE2, prostaglandin E2; STAT3, signal transducer and activator of transcription 3; TGFB-1, transforming growth factor beta-1; Treg, T regulatory cell. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

The FDA approval of two monoclonal antibodies in 2015has heralded a new era of targeted immunotherapies for multiple myeloma (MM). In this review we discuss the recent approaches using different immunological components to treat MM. In particular, we review current monoclonal antibody based therapies, engineered T- and NK cell products, 'off-target' immunomodulation, and strategies utilizing allogeneic cell transplantation in MM. We discuss how an immunologic approach offers promise for the treatment of this genetically heterogeneous disease, and how patients with acquired drug resistance may particularly benefit from these therapies. We also describe some of the limitations of the current strategies and speculate on the future of personalized immunotherapies for MM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Multiple clinical studies have treated mesothelin (MSLN)-positive solid tumors by administering MSLN-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells. Although these products are generally safe, efficacy is limited. Therefore, we generated and characterized a potent, fully human anti-MSLN CAR. In a phase 1 dose-escalation study of patients with solid tumors, we observed two cases of severe pulmonary toxicity following intravenous infusion of this product in the high-dose cohort (1-3 × 10 8 T cells per m 2 ). Both patients demonstrated progressive hypoxemia within 48 h of infusion with clinical and laboratory findings consistent with cytokine release syndrome. One patient ultimately progressed to grade 5 respiratory failure. An autopsy revealed acute lung injury, extensive T cell infiltration, and accumulation of CAR T cells in the lungs. RNA and protein detection techniques confirmed low levels of MSLN expression by benign pulmonary epithelial cells in affected lung and lung samples obtained from other inflammatory or fibrotic conditions, indicating that pulmonary pneumocyte and not pleural expression of mesothelin may lead to dose-limiting toxicity. We suggest patient enrollment criteria and dosing regimens of MSLN-directed therapies consider the possibility of dynamic expression of mesothelin in benign lung with a special concern for patients with underlying inflammatory or fibrotic conditions., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests C.H.J., R.M.Y., and M.M.D. are inventors on patents and/or patent applications licensed to Novartis Institutes of Biomedical Research and receive license revenue from such licenses. J.L.B., B.E., K.M., and L.Z. are holders of stock options and patents with Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research. R.M.Y. and M.M.D. are inventors on patents and/or patent applications licensed to Tmunity Therapeutics and receive license revenue from such licenses. C.H.J. and A.C. are scientific cofounders of Tmunity Therapeutics. C.H.J. is a scientific cofounder of Capstan Therapeutics and is a member of the scientific advisory boards of AC Immune, Alaunos, BluesphereBio, Cabaletta, Carisma, Cartography, Cellares, Celldex, Decheng, Poseida, Verismo, and WIRB-Copernicus. B.E. and R.J.G. completed work on this study before becoming employees at Miltenyi Biotec and AstraZeneca, respectively. R.J.G. holds or may hold AstraZeneca stock. N.C.S. holds equity in Fate Therapeutics and Pfizer. J.A.F. has received grants and personal fees from Cartography Bio., grants from Tmunity Therapeutics, and personal fees from Retro Bio and Shennon Bio outside the submitted work. Additionally, J.A.F. holds patents related to CAR T cells for cancer that are licensed and associated with royalties. S.F.L. is an inventor on patents in the areas of CAR T and biomarkers at Penn that were assigned to Novartis; received research funding from Novartis, Tmunity, and Cabaletta; and consults for Kite/Gilead. M.M.D. is a consultant for Tmunity Therapeutics and is a Consultant and Member on the Scientific Advisory Board of Cellares Corporation., (Copyright © 2023 The American Society of Gene and Cell Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Central nervous system (CNS) tumors are the most common solid malignancy in the pediatric population. Based on adoptive cellular therapy's clinical success against childhood leukemia and the preclinical efficacy against pediatric CNS tumors, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells offer hope of improving outcomes for recurrent tumors and universally fatal diseases such as diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG). However, a major obstacle for tumors of the brain and spine is ineffective T cell chemotaxis to disease sites. Locoregional CAR T cell delivery via infusion through an intracranial catheter is currently under study in multiple early phase clinical trials. Here, we describe the Seattle Children's single-institution experience including the multidisciplinary process for the preparation of successful, repetitive intracranial T cell infusion for children and the catheter-related safety of our 307 intracranial CAR T cell doses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common malignant primary brain tumor, known for its poor prognosis and high recurrence rate. Current standard of care includes surgical resection followed by combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Although immunotherapies have yielded promising results in hematological malignancies, their successful application in GBM remains limited due to a host of immunosuppressive factors unique to GBM. As a result of these roadblocks, research efforts have focused on utilizing combinatorial immunotherapies that target networks of immune processes in GBM with promising results in both preclinical and clinical trials, although limitations in overcoming the immunosuppressive factors within GBM remain. In this review, we aim to discuss the intrinsic and adaptive immune resistance unique to GBM and to summarize the current evidence and outcomes of engineered and non-engineered treatments targeted at overcoming GBM resistance to immunotherapy. Additionally, we aim to highlight the most promising strategies of targeted GBM immunotherapy combinatorial treatments and the insights that may directly improve the current patient prognosis and clinical care., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Gillette, Wang, Dowd and Toms.)

Background: Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) and other diffuse midline gliomas (DMG) of the thalamus and spinal cord are rare but devastating high-grade glial tumors of childhood with no curative treatment. Despite aggressive treatment attempts the prognosis has remained poor. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has been identified as a promising new approach in the treatment of DMG tumors; however, additional targets are urgently required given known tumor heterogeneity and the prospect of antigen escape of this cancer., Methods: Using cell surface mass spectrometry, we detected high HER2 cell surface protein across a panel of patient-derived DIPG cells, thereby identifying an existing CAR T cell therapy for use in DIPG. Primary human T cells were transduced to express a second-generation HER2 CAR and interrogated for efficacy against patient-derived DIPG cells., Results: HER2 CAR T cells demonstrated potent and antigen-specific cytotoxicity and cytokine secretion when co-cultured with patient-derived DIPG cells. Furthermore, HER2 CAR T cells provided a significant regression in intracranial DIPG xenograft tumors., Conclusions: HER2 CAR T cells are already in clinic development and are well tolerated in pediatric patients. Here we provide strong preclinical evidence for the inclusion of DIPG patients in future pediatric CNS tumor HER2 CAR T cell clinical trials., Competing Interests: The authors declare no direct conflicts of interest., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press, the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology.)

Relapsed and refractory hematologic malignancies have a very poor prognosis. Chimeric antigen receptor T cells are emerging as a powerful therapy in this setting. Early clinical trials of genetically modified T cells for the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and acute lymphoblastic leukemia have shown high complete response rates in patients with few therapeutic options. Exploration is ongoing for other hematologic malignancies including multiple myeloma, acute myeloid leukemia, and Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). At the same time, the design and production of chimeric antigen receptor T cells are being advanced so that this therapy can be more widely utilized. Cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity are common, but they are treatable and fully reversible. This review will review available data as well as future developments and challenges in the field. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T Cell Safety Database Project explored the use of cross-study safety data to identify risk factors associated with severe cytokine release syndrome (sCRS) and severe neurological toxicities (sNTX) after CAR T cell administration. Sponsors voluntarily submitted data for 1,926 subjects from 17 phases 1 and 2 studies (six acute lymphocytic leukemia [ALL], five non-Hodgkin's lymphoma [NHL], and six multiple myeloma [MM] studies). Subjects with ALL had a higher risk for developing sCRS and sNTX compared with subjects with NHL or MM. Subjects who received CAR T cells produced with gammaretrovirus vectors including CD28 sequences had higher rates of sNTX compared with subjects who received products produced with other vector designs included in the database. Use of cytokine-directed therapies and corticosteroids at lower toxicity grades were associated with lower rates of sCRS. Although this exploratory study was limited by unadjusted cross-study comparisons, it independently reproduced known risk factors for CAR T cell toxicity. Findings provide stakeholders in the CAR T cell clinical development community information on safety trends for consideration in early phase clinical trial design, as well as avenues for additional research., Competing Interests: The authors declare no competing interests.