Search

Objective: To determine the prevalence of gastrointestinal (GI) manifestations associated with diabetes mellitus (DM) in a Taiwanese population undergoing bidirectional endoscopies.Research Design and Methods: Subjects voluntarily undergoing upper endoscopy/colonoscopy as part of a medical examination at the National Taiwan University Hospital were recruited during 2009. Diagnosis of DM included past history of DM, fasting plasma glucose ≥ 126 mg/dL, or glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) ≥ 6.5%. Comparisons were made between diabetic and nondiabetic subjects, subjects with lower and higher HbA(1c) levels, and diabetic subjects with and without complications, respectively, for their GI symptoms, noninvasive GI testing results, and endoscopic findings.Results: Among 7,770 study subjects, 722 (9.3%) were diagnosed with DM. The overall prevalence of GI symptoms was lower in DM subjects (30.3 vs. 35.4%, P = 0.006). In contrast, the prevalence of erosive esophagitis (34.3 vs. 28.6%, P = 0.002), Barrett's esophagus (0.6 vs. 0.1%, P = 0.001), peptic ulcer disease (14.8 vs. 8.5%, P < 0.001), gastric neoplasms (1.8 vs. 0.7%, P = 0.003), and colonic neoplasms (26.6 vs. 16.5%, P < 0.001) was higher in diabetic subjects. Diagnostic accuracy of immunochemical fecal occult blood test for colonic neoplasms was significantly decreased in DM (70.7 vs. 81.7%, P < 0.001). Higher HbA(1c) levels were associated with a decrease of GI symptoms and an increase of endoscopic abnormalities. Diabetic subjects with complications had a higher prevalence of colonic neoplasms (39.2 vs. 24.5%, P = 0.002) than those without.Conclusions: DM and higher levels of HbA(1c) were associated with lower prevalence of GI symptoms but higher prevalence of endoscopic abnormalities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/aim: The present study explored the use of Waikato Environment for Knowledge Analysis (WEKA) to analyze hematological parameters for distinguishing potential development and progression of cervical cancer. Specifically, we aimed to identify significant biomarkers capable of differentiating atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) from cervical cancer-negative and advanced conditions such as cervical adenocarcinoma., Materials and Methods: Hematological and biochemical data were collected from patients and analyzed using data-mining algorithms available in WEKA. The random forest algorithm was employed to identify patterns among key hematological and biochemical biomarkers, alongside one-way analysis of variance to determine significant alterations in these parameters across cancer-negative, ASC-US, LSIL and adenocarcinoma groups., Results: Random forest was the classifier model that demonstrated superior performance metrics with high recall (1.000) and accuracy (0.843), Matthews correlation coefficient (0.510) and area under the curve (0.708), effectively identifying significant patterns within the datasets. One-way analysis of variance indicated significant alterations in red and white blood cell counts, platelet count, hemoglobin, hematocrit and other white blood cell parameters between cancer-negative, ASC-US, LSIL and adenocarcinoma, emphasizing the role of hematological parameters in identifying progression risk., Conclusion: The consistency in conclusions drawn from data mining and statistical analyses highlight the utility of hematological parameters as potential non-invasive biomarkers for cervical cancer screening and progression monitoring. These findings suggest that integrating machine-learning algorithms, particularly random forest, with hematological analysis might enhance early diagnosis and improve clinical outcomes for patients with cervical abnormalities., (Copyright © 2025, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Cecal intubation in colonoscopy relies on self-reporting. We developed an artificial intelligence-based cecum recognition system (AI-CRS) for post-hoc verification of cecal intubation and explored its impact on adenoma metrics., Methods: Quality metrics, including cecal intubation rate (CIR), adenoma detection rate (ADR), and other ADR-related metrics, were compared both before (2015-2018) and after (2019-2022) the implementation of the AI-CRS., Results: Although the CIR did not change significantly after the implementation of the AI-CRS, the ADR and advanced ADR significantly increased. Although the ADR significantly increased in all segments, the most significant increase in advanced ADR was observed in the proximal colon. Implementation of the AI-CRS was associated with a higher likelihood of detecting adenoma (adjusted odds ratio, 1.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-1.45) and advanced adenoma (adjusted odds ratio, 1.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-1.41), respectively., Conclusions: Implementation of a post-hoc verification of cecal intubation using an AI-CRS significantly improved various adenoma metrics in screening colonoscopy., Competing Interests: Disclosure The following author disclosed financial relationships: H-M. Chiu: Speaker for Olympus, Fujifilm, and Boston Scientific; research funding from Boston Scientific, Volition Rx, and Aether AI. All other authors disclosed no financial relationships. Research support for this study was provided in part to H-M. Chiu by the A1 Project of National Taiwan University Hospital (107-A142)., (Copyright © 2025 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background/aims: Anti-reflux mucosal ablation (ARMA) is a promising endoscopic intervention for proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-dependent gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, the effect of ARMA on esophageal motility remains unclear., Methods: Twenty patients with PPI-dependent GERD receiving ARMA were prospectively enrolled. Comprehensive self-report symptom questionnaires, endoscopy, 24-hour impedance-pH monitoring, and high-resolution impedance manometry were performed and analyzed before and 3 months after ARMA., Results: All ARMA procedures were performed successfully. Symptom scores, including GerdQ (11.16 ± 2.67 to 9.11 ± 2.64, P = 0.026) and reflux symptom index (11.63 ± 5.62 to 6.11 ± 3.86, P = 0.001), improved significantly, while 13 patients (65%) reported discontinuation of PPI. Total acid exposure time (5.84 ± 4.63% to 2.83 ± 3.41%, P = 0.024) and number of reflux episodes (73.05 ± 19.34 to 37.55 ± 22.71, P < 0.001) decreased significantly after ARMA. Improved esophagogastric junction (EGJ) barrier function, including increased lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure (13.89 ± 10.78 mmHg to 21.68 ± 11.5 mmHg, P = 0.034), 4-second integrated relaxation pressure (5.75 ± 6.42 mmHg to 9.99 ± 5.89 mmHg, P = 0.020), and EGJ-contractile integral (16.42 ± 16.93 mmHg·cm to 31.95 ± 21.25 mmHg·cm, P = 0.016), were observed. Esophageal body contractility also increased significantly (distal contractile integral, 966.85 ± 845.84 mmHg·s·cm to 1198.8 ± 811.74 mmHg·s·cm, P = 0.023). Patients with symptom improvement had better pre-AMRA esophageal body contractility., Conclusions: ARMA effectively improves symptoms and reflux burden, EGJ barrier function, and esophageal body contractility in patients with PPIdependent GERD during short-term evaluation. Longer follow-up to clarify the sustainability of ARMA is needed.

Background and Study Aim: Improvement of adenoma detection rate (ADR) effectively reduces the subsequent incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC). Three-dimensional (3D) colonoscopy provided more anatomical details than standard two-dimensional (2D) colonoscopy and improved ADR in a simulation study. We aimed to compare the ADR between 2D and 3D colonoscopy., Patients and Methods: In this multicenter randomized controlled trial, subjects aged ≥ 40 years who underwent colonoscopy for screening, surveillance, or symptoms were consecutively enrolled between February 2022 and June 2023 and randomized into 2D or 3D groups with a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was ADR. The secondary outcomes included the detection rates of flat adenoma, right-sided adenoma, proximal adenoma, sessile serrated lesion and advanced adenoma., Results: Of the 348 participants recruited, 158 and 160 were allocated to 2D and 3D colonoscopy, respectively. The mucosa inspection time was comparable between the 3D (9.8±2.6 minutes) and 2D (9.4±3.1 minutes) groups (p=.21). The 3D group had significantly higher ADR (53.1% vs. 38.6%, difference (95% confidence interval, CI): 14.5% (3.7-25.4), p=.0094), as well as higher detection rates for flat adenoma (35.0% vs. 21.5%, difference: 13.5% (3.7-23.3), p=.0076), right-sided adenoma (26.3% vs. 15.2%, difference: 11.1% (2.2-19.9), p=.015), proximal adenoma (38.1% vs. 23.4%, difference: 14.7% (4.7-24.7), p=.0045) and adenoma sized 5-9mm (45.0% vs. 31.0%, difference: 14.0% (3.4-24.5), p=.010). However, there was no difference in the detection rate of sessile serrated lesion and advanced adenoma., Conclusions: 3D colonoscopy improved the detection of adenomas without significantly increasing the mucosa inspection time. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05153746)., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).)

Introduction: Controversy remains regarding transparent cap-assisted technique improves adenoma detection rate (ADR) in colonoscopy. We aimed to investigate the effect of transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy (CAC) on ADR and other colonoscopy performance., Methods: We performed subanalysis of an international, multicenter, open-label database containing colonoscopy data from 11 centers in 4 Asian countries/regions on patients who underwent colonoscopy. The patient characteristics, procedure-related characteristics, and pathological findings of all detected lesions were prospectively recorded. The patients were divided into 2 groups as receiving colonoscopy with or without transparent cap attachment. The ADR and procedure time were compared between the 2 groups. Other procedural factors related to ADR were also investigated., Results: Between November 2020 and January 2022, 3,029 who underwent colonoscopy (transparent CAC, n = 1,796; standard colonoscopy, n = 1,233) were enrolled in this study. The transparent CAC group ADR was significantly higher than the conventional colonoscopy (55.1% vs. 50.0%, p < 0.01). Transparent CAC detected a higher proportion of patients with adenoma (odd ratio [OR]: 1.59, 95% CI: 1.13-2.24, p < 0.01) and any polypoid lesion (OR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.04-2.16, p = 0.03). Transparent CAC also reduced cecal intubation time (mean difference: -0.35 min) and total colonoscopy time (mean difference -3.4 min). In the other procedural factors, using linked-color imaging (OR: 1.75, 95% CI: 1.49-2.06, p < 0.01), patient body rotation (OR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.12-2.13, p < 0.01), longer withdrawal time (OR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.09-1.15, p < 0.01) were also significantly associated to adenoma detection., Conclusion: In real-world practice, transparent CAC is a safe and inexpensive technology that could improve adenoma and polyp detection., (© 2025 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background/purpose: We aimed to assess the effects of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication on the rebound of reflux-related symptoms among gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients., Methods: This prospective randomized study recruited patients with typical reflux symptoms and reflux esophagitis on esophagogastroduodenoscopy (NCT02934152). Patients positive for H. pylori via a urea breath test (UBT) were randomly assigned to receive bacterial eradication with triple therapy for 2 weeks either before or after proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment for 4 weeks. Follow-up was implemented with serial GerdQ evaluation and a subsequent UBT. The primary outcome was the incidence rates of symptom rebound between patients with and without H. pylori infection. The secondary outcomes included the severity of symptom rebound, incidence rates of symptom rebound, and successful eradication rates between the early and late eradication groups., Results: A total of 248 patients were enrolled, of whom 107 (43.1%) tested positive for H. pylori infection. All patients with and without concurrent H. pylori infection had significant symptom improvement over the entire treatment. Patients with H. pylori infection had significantly lower rates of symptom rebound (19.8% vs. 34.2%, p = 0.034) and rebound severity (1.8 ± 0.7 vs. 2.8 ± 1.6, p = 0.031) 4 weeks after eradication and PPI treatment than those without. The incidence rates of symptom rebound and successful eradication rates were not significantly different between the early and late eradication groups., Conclusions: GERD patients with concurrent H. pylori infection were less susceptible to symptom rebound after H. pylori eradication compared to those without., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrial.gov (NCT02934152)., (© 2025 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Colonoscopy has been widely regarded as the gold standard for its high diagnostic accuracy and preventive potential. However, its invasive nature, high cost, and suboptimal participation rates limit its utility at the population level. Non-invasive screening tests, notably the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) and multitarget stool DNA tests, present promising alternatives that may improve screening participation and reduce barriers to participation. Among these, FIT has demonstrated a consistent advantage in enhancing participation, which subsequently contributes to better long-term outcomes in CRC prevention. FIT-based two-step screening offers several practical advantages, including cost-effectiveness, non-invasiveness, and greater flexibility. Moreover, the quantitative nature of FIT allows for adjustable sensitivity thresholds and the ability of risk stratification, making it adaptable across diverse populations and scenarios. Through serial testing, FIT can increase cumulative detection rates over time. This approach facilitates the identification of high-risk individuals, allowing for more judicious use of colonoscopy resources and reducing unnecessary invasive procedures, especially among low-risk populations. Notably, evidence indicates that participation to FIT-based screening is consistently higher than to colonoscopy, which enhances the detection of early-stage cancers and advanced adenomas in the long run. Given the constraints of limited endoscopic capacity, the aging population, and the recent lowering of the recommended screening age due to the rising incidence of early-onset CRC, FIT emerges as a practical, flexible solution. The role of two-step FIT screening in improving participation and enabling risk-stratified, personalized approaches to CRC prevention is pivotal, advocating for its expanded integration into future screening paradigms., Competing Interests: Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Importance: Effects of screening for Helicobacter pylori on gastric cancer incidence and mortality are unknown., Objective: To evaluate the effects of an invitation to screen for H pylori on gastric cancer incidence and mortality., Design, Setting, and Participants: A pragmatic randomized clinical trial of residents aged 50 to 69 years in Changhua County, Taiwan, eligible for biennial fecal immunochemical tests (FIT) for colon cancer screening. Participants were randomized to either an invitation for H pylori stool antigen (HPSA) + FIT assessment or FIT alone. The study was conducted between January 1, 2014, and September 27, 2018. Final follow-up occurred December 31, 2020., Intervention: Invitation for testing for H pylori stool antigen., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were gastric cancer incidence and gastric cancer mortality. All invited individuals were analyzed according to the groups to which they were randomized., Results: Of 240 000 randomized adults (mean age, 58.1 years [SD, 5.6]; 46.8% female), 63 508 were invited for HPSA + FIT, and 88 995 were invited for FIT alone. Of the 240 000 randomized, 38 792 who were unreachable and 48 705 who did not receive an invitation were excluded. Of those invited, screening participation rates were 49.6% (31 497/63 508) for HPSA + FIT and 35.7% (31 777/88 995) for FIT alone. Among 12 142 participants (38.5%) with positive HPSA results, 8664 (71.4%) received antibiotic treatment, and eradication occurred in 91.9%. Gastric cancer incidence rates were 0.032% in the HPSA + FIT group and 0.037% in the FIT-alone group (mean difference, -0.005% [95% CI, -0.013% to 0.003%]; P = .23). Gastric cancer mortality rates were 0.015% in the HPSA + FIT group and 0.013% in the FIT-alone group (mean difference, 0.002% [95% CI, -0.004% to 0.007%]; P = .57). After adjusting for differences in screening participation, length of follow-up, and patient characteristics in post hoc analyses, an invitation for HPSA + FIT was associated with lower rates of gastric cancer (0.79 [95% CI, 0.63-0.98]) but not with gastric cancer mortality (1.02 [95% CI, 0.73-1.40]), compared with FIT alone. Among participants who received antibiotics, the most common adverse effects were abdominal pain or diarrhea (2.1%) and dyspepsia or poor appetite (0.8%)., Conclusions and Relevance: Among residents of Taiwan, an invitation to test for HPSA combined with FIT did not reduce rates of gastric cancer or gastric cancer mortality, compared with an invitation for FIT alone. However, when differences in screening participation and length of follow-up were accounted for, gastric cancer incidence, but not gastric cancer mortality, was lower in the HSPA + FIT group, compared with FIT alone., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01741363.

Background: The fecal immunochemical test for hemoglobin (FIT) is now a widely used non-invasive test in population-based organized screening programs for colorectal neoplasia. The positivity thresholds of tests currently in use are based on the fecal hemoglobin concentration (f-Hb), but the rationale for the adopted thresholds are not well documented. To understand current global usage of FIT in screening programs we conducted an international survey of the brands of FIT used, the f-Hb positivity threshold applied and the rationale for the choice., Methods: All members of the World Endoscopy Organization CRC Screening Committee were invited to complete an eight-element initial electronic survey exploring the key aims. Responses were obtained from 63 individuals, representing 38 specific locations in 28 countries. A follow-up survey on technical issues was offered to the 38 locations, with replies from 17 sites in 13 countries., Results: In-use quantitative FIT were provided by four main manufacturers; Minaris Medical (2 countries), Eiken Chemical Company/Polymedco (21), Alfresa Pharma (2) and Sentinel Diagnostics (4). Of the 38 screening sites, 15 used the threshold of 20 µg hemoglobin/g feces, while thresholds ranged between 8.5 and 120 ug/g in the remainder. Seven explanations were given for adopted FIT thresholds; maximizing the sensitivity for colorectal neoplasia (n = 23) was the most common followed by the availability of colonoscopy resources (n = 18). Predictive value, specificity, and cost effectiveness were less frequently reported as the rationale. Nine sites found it necessary to change the threshold that they had initially selected., Conclusions: This international survey has documented the wide range of FIT positivity thresholds that are in current use. Quantitative FITs enable programs to achieve the desired program outcomes within available resource constraints by adjusting the positivity threshold. This supports the need for enabling positivity threshold adjustment of emerging new screening tests based on novel predictive biomarkers, rather than providing inflexible test endpoints., Competing Interests: Declarations Conflict of interest Graeme P Young: Consultancy—Health First Systems, Institutional research support–Eiken Chemical Company. Han-Mo Chiu: Speaker honorarium—Olympus, Fujifilm, Boston Scientific, Research funding—Boston Scientific, Volition Rx, aether AI. Evelien Dekker: Institutional research support—FujiFilm. Consultancy—Olympus, Fujifilm, Ambu, InterVenn, Norgine, and Exact Sciences. Speaker’s fees—Olympus, GI Supply, Norgine, IPSEN/Mayoly, and FujiFilm. Harminder Singh: COI: Consultancy/advisory boards—Abbvie Canada, Amgen Canada, Roche Canada, Sandoz Canada, Organon Canada, Eli Lilly Canada, Takeda Canada, Pendopharm Inc, and Guardant Health, Inc. Institutional research support—Pfizer. Shares—VasCon. Erin L Symonds: Institutional research support—Eiken Chemical Company and Health First Systems. The authors declare no competing interests, and no financial arrangements related to the research or assistance with manuscript preparation., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Effective screening is essential to reducing CRC incidence and mortality by detecting the disease at early stages and identifying non-invasive precursors. While colonoscopy remains the most sensitive modality to visualize and remove neoplastic lesions thereby reducing CRC and the related death, its high cost and invasive nature limit its widespread use. The fecal immunochemical test (FIT), which offers a non-invasive alternative with higher public acceptance and comparable cost-effectiveness to colonoscopy, has become the preferred screening method in many regions. Newer non-invasive tests, such as multitarget stool DNA or RNA tests, have shown improved sensitivity for CRC and advanced adenomas, although their high costs and lower specificity present challenges for large-scale implementation. Blood-based circulating cell-free DNA test also offer promise but still require optimization to be cost-effective. The heterogeneity of the screening population further complicates the effectiveness of CRC screening programs. Variations in non-communicable disease risk factors, such as metabolic syndrome, lifestyle habits, and comorbidities, can significantly influence CRC risk and screening outcomes. Moreover, diverse screening behaviors, including inconsistent adherence to recommended screening intervals and the interchangeable use of different screening modalities, add complexity to achieving uniform effectiveness across populations. This variability underscores the need for personalized screening strategies that consider individual risk profiles and screening behaviors, as well as the application of cutting-edge technologies such as big data analytics, artificial intelligence, and digital twin approaches to evaluate its effectiveness. This article reviews the current CRC screening strategies, the advantages of non-invasive methods, and the potential of fecal hemoglobin concentration, to tailor screening intervals and improve risk stratification. It also discusses the emerging role of real-world data and advanced technologies in enhancing CRC screening accuracy and effectiveness, particularly in complex real-world scenarios where traditional methods may fall short. Before novel non-invasive approaches, such as ctDNA tests or polygenic risk scores, are validated and proven cost-effective, exploring the clinical utility of FIT and its quantitative measurement in both screening and surveillance by integrating real-world clinical big data seems a feasible direction for achieving sustained development in population screening., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Altered gut metabolites, especially short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), in feces and plasma are observed in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD)., Objective: We aimed to investigate the colonic expression of two SCFA receptors, free fatty acid receptor (FFAR)2 and FFAR3, and gut barrier integrity in patients with PD and correlations with clinical severity., Methods: In this retrospective study, colonic biopsy specimens were collected from 37 PD patients and 34 unaffected controls. Of this cohort, 31 participants (14 PD, 17 controls) underwent a series of colon biopsies. Colonic expression of FFAR2, FFAR3, and the tight junction marker ZO-1 were assayed by immunofluorescence staining. The You Only Look Once (version 8, YOLOv8) algorithm was used for automated detection and segmentation of immunostaining signal. PD motor function was assessed with the Movement Disorder Society (MDS)-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), and constipation was assessed using Rome-IV criteria., Results: Compared with controls, PD patients had significantly lower colonic expression of ZO-1 (p < 0.01) and FFAR2 (p = 0.01). On serial biopsy, colonic expression of FFAR2 and FFAR3 was reduced in the pre-motor stage before PD diagnosis (both p < 0.01). MDS-UPDRS motor scores did not correlate with colonic marker levels. Constipation severity negatively correlated with colonic ZO-1 levels (r = -0.49, p = 0.02)., Conclusions: Colonic expression of ZO-1 and FFAR2 is lower in PD patients compared with unaffected controls, and FFAR2 and FFAR3 levels decline in the pre-motor stage of PD. Our findings implicate a leaky gut phenomenon in PD and reinforce that gut metabolites may contribute to the process of PD., (© 2024. Fondazione Società Italiana di Neurologia.)

Objectives: There have been significant advances in the management of large (≥20 mm) laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) or nonpedunculated colorectal polyps; however, there is a lack of clear consensus on the management of these lesions with significant geographic variability especially between Eastern and Western paradigms. We aimed to provide an international consensus to better guide management and attempt to homogenize practices., Methods: Two experts in interventional endoscopy spearheaded an evidence-based Delphi study on behalf of the World Endoscopy Organization Colorectal Cancer Screening Committee. A steering committee comprising six members devised 51 statements, and 43 experts from 18 countries on six continents participated in a three-round voting process. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations tool was used to assess evidence quality and recommendation strength. Consensus was defined as ≥80% agreement (strongly agree or agree) on a 5-point Likert scale., Results: Forty-two statements reached consensus after three rounds of voting. Recommendations included: three statements on training and competency; 10 statements on preresection evaluation, including optical diagnosis, classification, and staging of LSTs; 14 statements on endoscopic resection indications and technique, including statements on en bloc and piecemeal resection decision-making; seven statements on postresection evaluation; and eight statements on postresection care., Conclusions: An international expert consensus based on the current available evidence has been developed to guide the evaluation, resection, and follow-up of LSTs. This may provide guiding principles for the global management of these lesions and standardize current practices., (© 2024 The Authors. Digestive Endoscopy published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.)

Introduction: Concerns regarding bleeding remain in cold snare polypectomy (CSP) for small pedunculated (0-Ip) polyps. The aim of this study was to compare the risk of CSP and hot snare polypectomy (HSP) for such lesions., Methods: Data on 0-Ip colorectal polyps ≤10 mm were extracted from a large, pragmatic, randomized trial. Immediate postpolypectomy bleeding (IPPB), defined as the perioperative use of a clip for bleeding, was evaluated through polyp-level analysis. Delayed postpolypectomy bleeding (DPPB), defined as bleeding occurring within 2 weeks postoperatively, was assessed at the patient-level among patients whose polyps were all ≤10 mm, including at least one 0-Ip polyp., Results: A total of 647 0-Ip polyps (CSP: 306; HSP: 341) were included for IPPB analysis and 386 patients (CSP: 192; HSP: 194) for DPPB analysis. CSP was associated with a higher incidence of IPPB (10.8% vs 3.2%, P < 0.001) but no adverse clinical events. The procedure time of all polypectomies was shorter for CSP than for HSP (123.0 ± 117.8 vs 166.0 ± 237.7 seconds, P = 0.003), while the procedure time of polypectomies with IPPB were similar (249.8 ± 140.2 vs 227.4 ± 125.9 seconds, P = 0.64). DPPB was observed in 3 patients (1.5%) in the HSP group, including one patient (0.5%) with severe bleeding, but not in the CSP group., Discussion: Despite CSP being associated with more IPPB events, it could be timely treated without adverse outcomes. Notably, no delayed bleeding occurred in the CSP group. Our findings support the use of CSP for 0-Ip polyps ≤ 10 mm., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American College of Gastroenterology.)

This study conducted adsorption experiments using Europium (Eu(III)) on geological materials collected from Taiwan. Batch tests on argillite, basalt, granite, and biotite showed that argillite and basalt exhibited strong adsorption reactions with Eu. X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis also clearly indicated differences before and after adsorption. By combining X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES), extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS), and wavelet transform (WT) analyses, we observed that the Fe 2 O 3 content significantly affects the Eu-Fe distance in the inner-sphere layer during the Eu adsorption process. The wavelet transform analysis for two-dimensional information helps differentiate two distances of Eu-O, which are difficult to analyze, with hydrated outer-sphere Eu-O distances ranging from 2.42 to 2.52 Å and inner-sphere Eu-O distances from 2.27 to 2.32 Å. The EXAFS results for Fe 2 O 3 and SiO 2 in argillite and basalt reveal different adsorption mechanisms. Fe 2 O 3 exhibits inner-sphere surface complexation in the order of basalt, argillite, and granite, while SiO 2 forms outer-sphere ion exchange with basalt and argillite. Wavelet transform analysis also highlights the differences among these materials.

Background and Aims: Early-onset colorectal cancer (CRC) is increasing globally. While the United States has lowered the age of initiation of screening to 45 years, other countries still start screening at 50 years of age. In Taiwan, the incidence of CRC has declined in 55- to 74-year-olds after the initiation of screening, but still increased in those 50-54 years of age, potentially due to the rising precancerous lesion incidence in 40- to 49-year-olds. This study aimed to explore the chronological trend of the prevalence of colorectal advanced neoplasms (AN) in the screening population 40-54 years of age., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed a screening colonoscopy cohort for prevalence of AN in average-risk subjects 40-54 years of age from 2003 to 2019. Logistic regression was used to distinguish cohort effect from time-period effect on the prevalence of AN., Results: In total, 27,805 subjects (52.1% male) were enrolled. There were notable increases in prevalence of AN in all 3 age groups during the 17-year span, but these were more rapid in those 40-44 years of age (0.99% to 3.22%) and 45-49 years of age (2.50% to 4.19%). Those 50-54 years of age had a higher risk of AN (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19-2.19) in 2003-2008 but not in later periods (2009-2014: aOR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.83-1.41; 2015-2019: aOR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.56-1.03) when compared with those 45-49 years of age., Conclusion: The prevalence of AN in those 40-54 years of age increased in the Taiwanese population, with a later birth cohort having a higher prevalence of AN. However, the prevalence of AN in those 45-49 years of age increased more remarkably and approximated that in those 50-54 years of age, which may justify earlier initiation of CRC screening in those 45 years of age., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) are associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer. Data on the prevalence of SSLs in Asia are limited. We performed this study to estimate the prevalence of SSLs in Asia and to explore endoscopic factors that are associated with SSL detection., Methods: This is a post-hoc analysis of a multicenter randomized controlled trial from four Asian countries/regions that compared adenoma detection rates using linked-color imaging (LCI) and white-light imaging. Colonoscopies were performed in an average-risk population for screening, diagnostic examination, or polyp surveillance. Patients with SSLs were compared against those without SSLs to evaluate for possible predictors of SSL detection using Firth's logistic regression., Results: 2898 participants (mean age 64.5 years) were included in the analysis. The estimated prevalence of SSLs was 4.0% (95%CI 3.4%-4.8%), with no sex or age group differences. On multivariable analysis, use of LCI (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.63, 95%CI 1.10-2.41), experienced endoscopists (aOR 1.94, 95%CI 1.25-3.00), use of transparent cap (aOR 1.75, 95%CI 1.09-2.81), and longer withdrawal time (aOR 1.06, 95%CI 1.03-1.10) were independently associated with SSL detection. Synchronous adenoma detection (aOR 1.89, 95%CI 1.20-2.99) was also predictive of SSL detection., Conclusion: The prevalence of SSLs in Asia is 4.0%. Use of LCI or a transparent cap, greater endoscopist experience, and longer withdrawal time were all associated with increased SSL detection., Competing Interests: S. Suzuki, T.L. Ang, H.-M. Chiu, and C.-Y. Kuo have received lecture fees from Fujifilm Corporation. T. Gotoda has received lecture fees from Fujifilm Corporation and Fujifilm Medical Co. Ltd. N. Yoshida and T. Takezawa have received research grants from Fujifilm Corporation. C.K. Tan, X.H. Koh, L.M. Wang, S. Aniwan, K. Laohavichitra, S. Chirapongsathorn, T. Yamamura, R. Rerknimitr, and H. Ishikawa declare that they have no conflict of interest., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aim: Linked color imaging (LCI) is an image-enhanced endoscopy technique that accentuates the color difference between red and white, potentially improving the adenoma detection rate (ADR). However, it remains unclear whether LCI performance in detecting colorectal lesions differs based on endoscopists' experience levels. We aimed to evaluate the differences in LCI efficacy based on the experience levels of endoscopists by conducting an exploratory analysis., Methods: In this post hoc analysis of an international randomized controlled trial comparing the detection of adenoma and other lesions using colonoscopy with LCI and high-definition white light imaging (WLI), we included patients from 11 institutions across four countries/regions: Japan, Thailand, Taiwan, and Singapore. We retrospectively reviewed differences in the lesion detection of LCI according to endoscopists' colonoscopy history or ADR., Results: We included 1692 and 1138 patients who underwent colonoscopies performed by 54 experts (experience of ≥ 5000 colonoscopies) and by 43 non-experts (experience of < 5000 colonoscopies), respectively. Both expert and non-expert groups showed a significant improvement in ADR with LCI compared to WLI (expert, 61.7% vs 46.4%; P < 0.001; non-expert, 56.6% vs 46.4%; P < 0.001). LCI had no effect on sessile serrated lesion detection rate in non-experts (3.1% vs 2.5%; P = 0.518). LCI significantly improved detection rates in endoscopists with relatively low detection performance, defined as an ADR < 50%., Conclusions: This exploratory study analyzed data from a previous trial and revealed that LCI is useful for both experts and non-experts and is even more beneficial for endoscopists with relatively low detection performance using WLI., (© 2024 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Study Objectives: The relationship between obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is complex. We aimed to determine the association of self-reported and objective sleep parameters with diverse manifestations of the GERD spectrum., Methods: We prospectively recruited 561 individuals who underwent an electrocardiogram-based cardiopulmonary coupling for OSA screening during a health check-up. All participants received the Reflux Disease Questionnaire and an upper endoscopy to determine the presence of troublesome reflux symptoms and erosive esophagitis (EE). Sleep quality was evaluated by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and sleep dysfunction was defined as a Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index score > 5. OSA was defined as a cardiopulmonary coupling-derived apnea-hypopnea index exceeding 15 events/h. Comparisons were made between participants on the GERD spectrum with respect to their various self-reported and objective sleep parameters., Results: Among the 277 patients with GERD (49.4%), 198 (35.3%) had EE. Patients with GERD had higher PSQI scores (6.99 ± 3.97 vs 6.07 ± 3.73, P = .005) and a higher prevalence of sleep dysfunction (60.6% vs 49.6%, P = .009). Patients with EE had a higher prevalence of OSA (42.9% vs 33.9%, P = .034). Along the GERD spectrum, symptomatic patients with EE had the highest PSQI scores and prevalence of sleep dysfunction (70.7%), while asymptomatic patients with EE had the highest prevalence of OSA (44%)., Conclusions: Our findings indicate a high prevalence of sleep dysfunction among individuals with GERD. Furthermore, patients on the GERD spectrum are prone to experiencing a range of self-reported and objective sleep disturbances., Citation: Hu K-Y, Tseng P-H, Hsu W-C, et al. Association of self-reported and objective sleep disturbance with the spectrum of gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Clin Sleep Med . 2024;20(6):911-920., (© 2024 American Academy of Sleep Medicine.)

Importance: Given a gradient relationship between fecal hemoglobin (f-Hb) concentration and colorectal neoplasia demonstrated previously, using f-Hb-guided interscreening interval has increasingly gained attention in population-based fecal immunological test (FIT), but it is very rare to address how to implement such a precision strategy and whether it can economize the use of FIT and colonoscopy., Objective: To demonstrate the applicability of personalized colorectal cancer (CRC) screening with f-Hb-guided screening intervals to reduce the number of FITs and colonoscopy with as equivalent efficacy as universal biennial screening., Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cohort study for developing f-Hb-guided precision interscreening interval was conducted using data on a Taiwanese biennial nationwide FIT screening program that enrolled more than 3 million participants aged 50 to 74 years between 2004 and 2014. The cohort was followed up over time until 2019 to ascertain colorectal neoplasia and causes of death. A comparative study was further designed to compare the use of FIT and colonoscopy between the personalized f-Hb-guided group and the universal biennial screening group given the equivalent efficacy of reducing CRC-related outcomes., Main Outcomes and Measurements: A spectrum of f-Hb-guided intervals was determined by using the Poisson regression model given the equivalent efficacy of a universal biennial screening. The use of FIT and colonoscopy for the pragmatic f-Hb-guided interval group was measured compared with the universal biennial screening group. Data analysis was performed from September 2022 to October 2023., Results: Using data from the 3 500 250 participants (mean [SD] age, 57.8 [6.0] years) enrolled in the Taiwanese biennial nationwide FIT screening program, an incremental increase in baseline f-Hb associated with colorectal neoplasia and CRC mortality consistently was observed. Participants with different f-Hb levels were classified into distinct risk categories. Various screening intervals by different f-Hb levels were recommended. Using the proposed f-Hb-guided screening intervals, it was found that the personalized method was imputed to reduce the number of FIT tests and colonoscopies by 49% and 28%, respectively, compared with the universal biennial screening., Conclusion and Relevance: The gradient relationship between f-Hb and colorectal neoplasia and CRC mortality was used to develop personalized FIT screening with f-Hb-guided screening intervals. Such a precision interscreening interval led to the reduced use of FIT test and colonoscopy without compromising the effectiveness of universal biennial screening.

Background: The use of artificial intelligence (AI) can revolutionize health care, but this raises risk concerns. It is therefore crucial to understand how clinicians trust and accept AI technology. Gastroenterology, by its nature of being an image-based and intervention-heavy specialty, is an area where AI-assisted diagnosis and management can be applied extensively., Objective: This study aimed to study how gastroenterologists or gastrointestinal surgeons accept and trust the use of AI in computer-aided detection (CADe), computer-aided characterization (CADx), and computer-aided intervention (CADi) of colorectal polyps in colonoscopy., Methods: We conducted a web-based questionnaire from November 2022 to January 2023, involving 5 countries or areas in the Asia-Pacific region. The questionnaire included variables such as background and demography of users; intention to use AI, perceived risk; acceptance; and trust in AI-assisted detection, characterization, and intervention. We presented participants with 3 AI scenarios related to colonoscopy and the management of colorectal polyps. These scenarios reflect existing AI applications in colonoscopy, namely the detection of polyps (CADe), characterization of polyps (CADx), and AI-assisted polypectomy (CADi)., Results: In total, 165 gastroenterologists and gastrointestinal surgeons responded to a web-based survey using the structured questionnaire designed by experts in medical communications. Participants had a mean age of 44 (SD 9.65) years, were mostly male (n=116, 70.3%), and mostly worked in publicly funded hospitals (n=110, 66.67%). Participants reported relatively high exposure to AI, with 111 (67.27%) reporting having used AI for clinical diagnosis or treatment of digestive diseases. Gastroenterologists are highly interested to use AI in diagnosis but show different levels of reservations in risk prediction and acceptance of AI. Most participants (n=112, 72.72%) also expressed interest to use AI in their future practice. CADe was accepted by 83.03% (n=137) of respondents, CADx was accepted by 78.79% (n=130), and CADi was accepted by 72.12% (n=119). CADe and CADx were trusted by 85.45% (n=141) of respondents and CADi was trusted by 72.12% (n=119). There were no application-specific differences in risk perceptions, but more experienced clinicians gave lesser risk ratings., Conclusions: Gastroenterologists reported overall high acceptance and trust levels of using AI-assisted colonoscopy in the management of colorectal polyps. However, this level of trust depends on the application scenario. Moreover, the relationship among risk perception, acceptance, and trust in using AI in gastroenterology practice is not straightforward., (©Wilson WB Goh, Kendrick YA Chia, Max FK Cheung, Kalya M Kee, May O Lwin, Peter J Schulz, Minhu Chen, Kaichun Wu, Simon SM Ng, Rashid Lui, Tiing Leong Ang, Khay Guan Yeoh, Han-mo Chiu, Deng-chyang Wu, Joseph JY Sung. Originally published in JMIR AI (https://ai.jmir.org), 07.03.2024.)

Background: The burden of cancer can be altered by screening. The field of cancer screening is constantly evolving; from the initiation of program for new cancer types as well as exploring innovative screening strategies (e.g. new screening tests). The aim of this study was to perform a landscape analysis of existing cancer screening programs in South-East Asia and the Western Pacific., Methods: We conducted an overview of cancer screening in the region with the goal of summarizing current designs of cancer screening programs. First, a selective narrative literature review was used as an exploration to identify countries with organized screening programs. Second, representatives of each country with an organized program were approached and asked to provide relevant information on the organizations of their national or regional cancer screening program., Results: There was wide variation in the screening strategies offered in the considered region with only eight programs identified as having an organized design. The majority of these programs did not meet all the essential criteria for being organized screening. The greatest variation was observed in the starting and stopping ages., Conclusions: Essential criteria of organized screening are missed. Improving organization is crucial to ensure that the beneficial effects of screening are achieved in the long-term. It is strongly recommended to consider a regional cancer screening network., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: We investigated coexisting lesion types in patients with invasive colorectal cancer (CRC) in a multinational study for comprehending the adenoma-carcinoma and serrated pathway about the development of CRC., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 3,050 patients enrolled in the international randomized controlled trial (ATLAS study) to evaluate the colorectal polyp detection performance of image-enhanced endoscopy in 11 institutions in four Asian countries/regions. In the current study, as a subgroup analysis of the ATLAS study, 92 CRC patients were extracted and compared to 2,958 patients without CRC to examine the effects of age, sex, and coexisting lesion types (high-grade adenoma [HGA], low-grade adenoma with villous component [LGAV], 10 adenomas, adenoma ≥10 mm, sessile serrated lesions [SSLs], and SSLs with dysplasia [SSLD]). Additional analyses of coexisting lesion types were performed according to sex and location of CRC (right- or left-sided)., Results: A multivariate analysis showed that HGA (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] 4.29 [2.16-8.18]; p &lt; 0.01), LGAV (3.02 [1.16-7.83], p = 0.02), and age (1.04 [1.01-1.06], p = 0.01) were independently associated with CRC. According to sex, the coexisting lesion types significantly associated with CRC were LGAV (5.58 [1.94-16.0], p &lt; 0.01) and HGA (4.46 [1.95-10.20], p &lt; 0.01) in males and HGA (4.82 [1.47-15.80], p &lt; 0.01) in females. Regarding the location of CRC, SSLD (21.9 [1.31-365.0], p = 0.03) was significant for right-sided CRC, and HGA (5.22 [2.39-11.4], p &lt; 0.01) and LGAV (3.46 [1.13-10.6], p = 0.02) were significant for left-sided CRC., Conclusions: The significant coexisting lesions in CRC differed according to sex and location. These findings may contribute to comprehending the pathogenesis of CRC., (© 2024 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

With new advances in next generation sequencing (NGS) technology at reduced costs, research on bacterial genomes in the environment has become affordable. Compared to traditional methods, NGS provides high-throughput sequencing reads and the ability to identify many species in the microbiome that were previously unknown. Numerous bioinformatics tools and algorithms have been developed to conduct such analyses. However, in order to obtain biologically meaningful results, the researcher must select the proper tools and combine them to construct an efficient pipeline. This complex procedure may include tens of tools, each of which require correct parameter settings. Furthermore, an NGS data analysis involves multiple series of command-line tools and requires extensive computational resources, which imposes a high barrier for biologists and clinicians to conduct NGS analysis and even interpret their own data. Therefore, we established a public gut microbiome database, which we call Twnbiome, created using healthy subjects from Taiwan, with the goal of enabling microbiota research for the Taiwanese population. Twnbiome provides users with a baseline gut microbiome panel from a healthy Taiwanese cohort, which can be utilized as a reference for conducting case-control studies for a variety of diseases. It is an interactive, informative, and user-friendly database. Twnbiome additionally offers an analysis pipeline, where users can upload their data and download analyzed results. Twnbiome offers an online database which non-bioinformatics users such as clinicians and doctors can not only utilize to access a control set of data, but also analyze raw data with a few easy clicks. All results are customizable with ready-made plots and easily downloadable tables. Database URL: http://twnbiome.cgm.ntu.edu.tw/ ., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

In healthcare facilities, answering the questions from the patients and their companions about the health problems is regarded as an essential task. With the current shortage of medical personnel resources and an increase in the patient-to-clinician ratio, staff in the medical field have consequently devoted less time to answering questions for each patient. However, studies have shown that correct healthcare information can positively improve patients' knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors. Therefore, delivering correct healthcare knowledge through a question-answering system is crucial. In this article, we develop an interactive healthcare question-answering system that uses attention-based models to answer healthcare-related questions. Attention-based transformer models are utilized to efficiently encode semantic meanings and extract the medical entities inside the user query individually. These two features are integrated through our designed fusion module to match against the pre-collected healthcare knowledge set, so that our system will finally give the most accurate response to the user in real-time. To improve the interactivity, we further introduce a recommendation module and an online web search module to provide potential questions and out-of-scope answers. Experimental results for question-answer retrieval show that the proposed method has the ability to retrieve the correct answer from the FAQ pairs in the healthcare domain. Thus, we believe that this application can bring more benefits to human beings.

Colonoscopy is crucial in preventing colorectal cancer (CRC) and reducing associated mortality. This comprehensive review examines the importance of high-quality colonoscopy and associated quality indicators, including bowel preparation, cecal intubation rate, withdrawal time, adenoma detection rate (ADR), complete resection, specimen retrieval, complication rates, and patient satisfaction, while also discussing other ADR-related metrics. Additionally, the review draws attention to often overlooked quality aspects, such as nonpolypoid lesion detection, as well as insertion and withdrawal skills. Moreover, it explores the potential of artificial intelligence in enhancing colonoscopy quality and highlights specific considerations for organized screening programs. The review also emphasizes the implications of organized screening programs and the need for continuous quality improvement. A high-quality colonoscopy is crucial for preventing postcolonoscopy CRC- and CRC-related deaths. Health-care professionals must develop a thorough understanding of colonoscopy quality components, including technical quality, patient safety, and patient experience. By prioritizing ongoing evaluation and refinement of these quality indicators, health-care providers can contribute to improved patient outcomes and develop more effective CRC screening programs., (© 2023 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.)

Objective: New screening tests for colorectal cancer (CRC) are rapidly emerging. Conducting trials with mortality reduction as the end point supporting their adoption is challenging. We re-examined the principles underlying evaluation of new non-invasive tests in view of technological developments and identification of new biomarkers., Design: A formal consensus approach involving a multidisciplinary expert panel revised eight previously established principles., Results: Twelve newly stated principles emerged. Effectiveness of a new test can be evaluated by comparison with a proven comparator non-invasive test. The faecal immunochemical test is now considered the appropriate comparator, while colonoscopy remains the diagnostic standard. For a new test to be able to meet differing screening goals and regulatory requirements, flexibility to adjust its positivity threshold is desirable. A rigorous and efficient four-phased approach is proposed, commencing with small studies assessing the test's ability to discriminate between CRC and non-cancer states ( phase I ), followed by prospective estimation of accuracy across the continuum of neoplastic lesions in neoplasia-enriched populations ( phase II ). If these show promise, a provisional test positivity threshold is set before evaluation in typical screening populations. Phase III prospective studies determine single round intention-to-screen programme outcomes and confirm the test positivity threshold. Phase IV studies involve evaluation over repeated screening rounds with monitoring for missed lesions. Phases III and IV findings will provide the real-world data required to model test impact on CRC mortality and incidence., Conclusion: New non-invasive tests can be efficiently evaluated by a rigorous phased comparative approach, generating data from unbiased populations that inform predictions of their health impact., Competing Interests: Competing interests: Board membership: TRL, RES, LG, FM, CS, RS, H-MC, ED, AK, HS, GAM, SI. Consultancy: LG, UL, GPY, FM, JM, SG, ED, AK, HS, SI. Expert testimony: FM. Grants or contract research: RSB, TRL, RES, FM, RS, FM, ED, ML, GAM, LC. Lectures/Other education events: LG, FM, H-MC, ED, AK. Patents: GPY, RSB, BC, AK, GAM. Receipt of equipment or supplies: LG, RES, ED, ML, GAM. Stock/Stock options: GPY, UL, JM, SG, ED, AK, GAM. Other professional relationships: GPY, SG., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

This two-year follow-up study examined the predictive relationships of theory of mind (ToM) to social interaction by reciprocal social behaviors (RSBs) and social functioning (SF) in 106 children with ASD. The results of the path analysis showed that the earlier ToM predicted children's current component RSBs (B = 3.53, SE = 1.86, p = 0.039) and the current SF (B = 1.79-1.87, SE = 0.03-0.34, p < 0.001). The aloof and passive social interaction styles predicted fewer turn-taking of RSBs (B =  - 48.77 to - 111.17, p < 0.001) and fewer components of RSBs (B =  - 36.30 to - 81.41, p < 0.001). This finding provides empirical evidence that ToM predicts social interaction in children with ASD., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background and Aim: Currently, some countries still acknowledge double-contrast barium enema (DCBE) as a backup confirmatory examination when colonoscopy is not feasible or incomplete in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs. This study aims to compare the performance of colonoscopy and DCBE in terms of the risk of incident CRC after negative results in the fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based Taiwan Colorectal Cancer Screening Program., Methods: Subjects who had positive FITs and received confirmatory exams, either colonoscopy or DCBE, without the findings of neoplastic lesions from 2004 to 2013 in the screening program comprised the study cohort. Both the colonoscopy and DCBE subcohorts were followed until the end of 2018 and linked to the Taiwan Cancer Registry to identify incident CRC cases. Multivariate analysis was conducted to compare the risk of incident CRC in both subcohorts after controlling for potential confounders., Results: A total of 102 761 colonoscopies and 5885 DCBEs were performed after positive FITs without neoplastic findings during the study period. By the end of 2018, 2113 CRCs (2.7 per 1000 person-years) and 368 CRCs (7.6 per 1000 person-years) occurred in the colonoscopy and DCBE subcohorts, respectively. After adjusting for major confounders, DCBE had a significantly higher risk of incident CRC than colonoscopy, with an adjusted HR of 2.81 (95% CI = 2.51-3.14)., Conclusions: In the FIT screening program, using DCBE as a backup examination was associated with a nearly threefold risk of incident CRC compared with colonoscopy, demonstrating that it is no longer justified as a backup examination for incomplete colonoscopy., (© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology published by Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) is effective in reducing CRC related mortality. Current screening methods include endoscopy based and biomarker based approaches. This guideline is a joint official statement of the Asian Pacific Association of Gastroenterology (APAGE) and the Asian Pacific Society of Digestive Endoscopy (APSDE), developed in response to the increasing use of, and accumulating supportive evidence for the role of, non-invasive biomarkers for the diagnosis of CRC and its precursor lesions. A systematic review of 678 publications and a two stage Delphi consensus process involving 16 clinicians in various disciplines was undertaken to develop 32 evidence based and expert opinion based recommendations for the use of faecal immunochemical tests, faecal based tumour biomarkers or microbial biomarkers, and blood based tumour biomarkers for the detection of CRC and adenoma. Comprehensive up-to-date guidance is provided on indications, patient selection and strengths and limitations of each screening tool. Future research to inform clinical applications are discussed alongside objective measurement of research priorities. This joint APAGE-APSDE practice guideline is intended to provide an up-to-date guide to assist clinicians worldwide in utilising non-invasive biomarkers for CRC screening; it has particular salience for clinicians in the Asia-Pacific region., Competing Interests: Competing interests: FKLC is Board Member of CUHK Medical Centre. He is a co-founder, non-executive Board Chairman and shareholder of GenieBiome Ltd. He receives patent royalties through his affiliated institutions. He has received fees as an advisor and honoraria as a speaker for Eisai Co. Ltd., AstraZeneca, Pfizer Inc., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., and Takeda (China) Holdings Co. Ltd. MCSW is the honorary medical advisor of GenieBiome. He is an advisory committee member of Pfizer, external expert of GlaxoSmithKline, a member of the advisory board of AstraZeneca and has been paid consultancy fees for providing advice on research. ATC is a member of the AGA Governing Board and has received grant funding from Freenome for a colorectal cancer screening study. HM-C is the principal investigator, Taiwan CRC Screening Program, Asian Chair of WEO CRC screening committee and secretary general of the Gastroenterological Society of Taiwan (GEST), received research funding from Volition Rx, Eiken Chemical and Aether AI, and lecture honorarium from Olympus, Fuji and Eiken Chemical. JEE has served on clinical advisory boards for Paion, has served on the clinical advisory board and has share options in Satisfai Health and reports speaker fees from Falk, Jannsen and Medtronic. He was also part of the British Society of Gastroenterology guideline working group for 'Faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) in patients with signs or symptoms of suspected colorectal cancer (CRC)'. He is funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the National Health Service, the NIHR or the Department of Health. KW has served as an advisory board member for BioChain (Beijing), Ferring, Janssen, Takeda and Abbvie, and a speaker for BioChain (Beijing), Ferring, Janssen, Abbvie, Everest and Takeda. He is named inventor of patent applications held by the FMMU and BioChain (Beijing) that cover the diagnostic use of ctDNA related to gastrointestinal cancers. SCN has served as an advisory board member for Pfizer, Ferring, Janssen, and Abbvie and received honoraria as a speaker for Ferring, Tillotts, Menarini, Janssen, Abbvie, and Takeda. SCN has received research grants through her affiliated institutions from Olympus, Ferring, and Abbvie. SCN is a scientific co-founder and shareholder of GenieBiome Ltd. SCN receives patent royalties through her affiliated institutions., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background & Aims: Effects of linked-color imaging (LCI) on colorectal lesion detection and colonoscopy quality remain controversial. This study compared the detection rates of adenoma and other precursor lesions using LCI vs white-light imaging (WLI) during screening, diagnostic, and surveillance colonoscopies., Methods: This randomized controlled trial was performed at 11 institutions in 4 Asian countries/regions. Patients with abdominal symptoms, a primary screening colonoscopy, positive fecal immunochemical test results, or undergoing postpolypectomy surveillance were recruited and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the LCI or high-definition WLI group. The primary outcome was adenoma detection rate (ADR). Secondary outcomes were polyp detection rate, advanced ADR, sessile serrated lesion (SSL) detection rate, and the mean number of adenomas per colonoscopy. The recommended surveillance schedule distribution after trial colonoscopy was analyzed., Results: Between November 2020 and January 2022, there were 3050 participants (LCI, n = 1527; WLI, n = 1523) recruited. The LCI group ADR was significantly higher than the WLI group ADR using intention-to-treat (58.7% vs 46.7%; P < .01) and per-protocol analyses (59.6% vs 46.4%; P < .01). The LCI group polyp detection rates (68.6% vs 59.5%; P < .01), SSL detection rates (4.8% vs 2.8%; P < .01), and adenomas per colonoscopy (1.48 vs 1.02; P < .01) also were significantly higher. However, the advanced ADR was not significantly different (13.2% vs 11.0%; P = .06). Significantly more patients in the LCI group had shorter recommended surveillance schedules than the WLI group (P < .01)., Conclusions: Compared with WLI, LCI improved adenoma and other polyp detection rates, including SSLs, resulting in alteration of the recommended surveillance schedule after screening, diagnostic, and postpolypectomy surveillance colonoscopies., Trial Registration Number: UMIN000042432 (https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm)., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Trichorhinophalangeal syndrome type 1 (TRPS1) is a novel immunohistochemical marker with excellent performance in distinguishing breast carcinoma from other cancers in surgical specimens. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic utility of TRPS1 compared with GATA3 for metastatic breast carcinoma in effusion cytology specimens., Methods: In total, 91 cell blocks of malignant effusion specimens, including 47 metastatic breast carcinomas (nine triple-negative breast carcinomas [TNBCs] and 38 non-TNBCs) and 44 nonmammary malignancies, were selected for TRPS1 and GATA3 immunohistochemistry. Modified H scores ≥ 200 were considered positive staining., Results: The positive rate of TRPS1 was similar between TNBC and non-TNBC (77.8% vs 73.3%, p = .802), whereas the positive rate of GATA3 was lower in TNBC than in non-TNBC (66.7% vs 89.5%, p = .087). The positive rate of TRPS1 was significantly higher in breast carcinoma than in urothelial carcinoma (74.5% vs 0%, p < .001), whereas the positive rate of GATA3 showed no difference between these two (85.1% vs 85.7%, p = .956). Notably, diffuse and strong aberrant expression of TRPS1 was observed in one lung adenocarcinoma and one serous adenocarcinoma in this series. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of TRPS1 immunohistochemistry for breast carcinoma were 74.5%, 95.5%, 94.6%, and 77.8%, respectively., Conclusion: TRPS1 is a sensitive and specific marker for metastatic breast cancer in serous effusion cell-block specimens. It shows superior sensitivity and specificity compared with GATA3, especially in the TNBC setting and for excluding urothelial carcinoma., (© 2022 American Cancer Society.)