Search

Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have been used to control epilepsy. More than 17 new AEDs, including gabapentin (GPN), lacosamide (LCM), perampanel (PER), pregabalin (PRG), rufinamide (RFM), and vigabatrin (VGB) have been approved and marketed since 1989. Accurate measurement of serum concentration of the antiepileptic drugs is crucial to achieve optimal efficacy and avoid adverse events. We describe an accurate and precise liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for the simultaneous quantification of GPN, LCM, PER, PRG, RFM, and VGB in serum. The method requires a small volume of sample (10 μL) and has a total chromatographic run time of 4 min for simultaneous measurement of these drugs. The method showed good accuracy with a bias of -0.2-5%. The intra- and inter-day imprecision were less than 5.0% for all the analytes. The linear assay ranges were 0.3-26 μg/mL for GPN, 0.15-24 μg/mL for LCM, 7.4-1881 ng/mL for PER, 0.03-13 μg/mL for PRG, 0.78-90 μg/mL for RFM, and 0.3-43 μg/mL for VGB., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Importance: This manuscript describes an occurrence of false-positive GM tests in patients receiving TPN products from a manufacturer who had recently changed the supplier of the glucose component. We describe the clinical presentation of nine false-positive cases and the results of serologic and microbiological investigations of the TPN products suspected of contamination with GM. Attempts to detect GM in parenteral nutrition products were made since the detection of GM in sodium gluconate-containing solutions in 2007, but none of them identified the source of elevated GM indexes in TPN products. However, the present study demonstrated that the glucose component of the TPN products contained a high level of GM antigen, which caused false-positive GM assay results. The source of GM was glucoamylase, which was derived from A. niger in the manufacturing process. Physicians and clinical microbiology laboratories should be aware of this issue to improve interpretation and patient care., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.