Search

The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and feasibility of sequential hypothermic oxygenated perfusion and normothermic machine perfusion and the potential benefits of graft viability preservation and assessment before liver transplantation.With the Food and Drug Administration and institutional review board approval, 17 expanded criteria donor livers underwent sequential hypothermic oxygenated perfusion and normothermic machine perfusion using our institutionally developed perfusion device.Expanded criteria donor livers were from older donors, donors after cardiac death, with steatosis, hypertransaminasemia, or calcified arteries. Perfusion duration ranged between 1 and 2 hours for the hypothermic oxygenated perfusion phase and between 4 and 9 hours for the normothermic machine perfusion phase. Three livers were judged to be untransplantable during normothermic machine perfusion based on perfusate lactate, bile production, and macro-appearance. One liver was not transplanted because of recipient issue after anesthesia induction and failed reallocation. Thirteen livers were transplanted, including 9 donors after cardiac death livers (donor warm ischemia time 16-25 minutes) and 4 from donors after brain death. All livers had the standardized lactate clearance60% (perfusate lactate cleared to4.0 mmol/L) within 3 hours of normothermic machine perfusion. Bile production rate was 0.2 to 10.7 mL/h for donors after brain death livers and 0.3 to 6.1 mL/h for donors after cardiac death livers. After transplantation, 5 cases had early allograft dysfunction (3 donors after cardiac death and 2 donors after brain death livers). No graft failure or patient death has occurred during follow-up time of 6 to 13 months. Two livers developed ischemic cholangiopathy. Compared with our previous normothermic machine perfusion study, the bile duct had fewer inflammatory cells in histology, but the post-transplant outcomes had no difference.Sequential hypothermic oxygenated perfusion and normothermic machine perfusion preservation is safe and feasible and has the potential benefits of preserving and evaluating expanded criteria donor livers.

There is a nationwide shortage of organs available for liver transplantation. Living donors help meet this growing demand. Not uncommonly, donors will have positive autoantibodies. However, it is unclear whether donor positive autoantibodies are correlated with worse outcomes following living liver donor transplantations.To analyze the significance of positive autoantibodies in donors on post-transplant outcomes in recipients.We performed a retrospective review of living liver donors who had undergone liver transplantation between January 1, 2012 and August 31, 2021. Demographic characteristics and pre-transplant data including antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and anti-smooth muscle antibody titers were collected in donors. Outcomes of interest were post-transplantation complications including mortality, biliary strictures, biliary leaks, infection, and rejection. Pediatric recipients and donors without measured pre-transplant autoantibody serologies were excluded from this study.172 living donor liver transplantations were performed during the study period, of which 115 patients met inclusion criteria. 37 (32%) living donors were autoantibody-positive with a median ANA titer of 1:160 (range 1:80 to 1:1280) and median anti-SMA titer of 1:40 (range 1:20 to 1:160). There were no significant differences in baseline demographics between the autoantibody positive and negative donors. Post-transplantation rates of death (Isolated pre-transplant autoantibody positivity is not correlated to worse post-transplant outcomes in living liver donor transplants.

This study was designed to review laparoscopic living donor liver transplantations (LDLTs) at a single center that achieved complete transition from open surgery to laparoscopy. LDLTs performed from January 2013 to July 2021 were reviewed. Comparisons between open and laparoscopic surgeries were performed according to periods divided into initial, transition, and complete transition periods. A total of 775 LDLTs, 506 laparoscopic and 269 open cases, were performed. Complete transition was achieved in 2020. Bile duct variations were significantly abundant in the open group both in the initial period (30.2% vs. 8.1%; p 0.001) and transition period (48.1% vs. 24.3%; p 0.001). Portal vein variation was more abundant in the open group only in the initial period (13.0% vs. 4.1%; p = 0.03). Although the donor reoperation rate (0.0% vs. 4.1%; p = 0.02) and Grade III or higher complication rate (5.6% vs. 13.5%; p = 0.03) were significantly higher in the laparoscopy group in the initial period, there were no differences during the transition period as well as in overall cases. Median number of opioids required by the donor (three times [interquartile range, IQR, 1-6] vs. 1 time [IQR, 0-3]; p 0.001) was lower, and the median hospital stay (10 days [IQR, 8-12] vs. 8 days [IQR, 7-9]; p 0.001) was shorter in the laparoscopy group. Overall recipient bile leakage rate (23.8% vs. 12.8%; p 0.001) and overall Grade III or higher complication rate (44.6% vs. 37.2%; p = 0.009) were significantly lower in the laparoscopy group. Complete transition to laparoscopic living donor hepatectomy was possible after accumulating a significant amount of experience. Because donor morbidity can be higher in the initial period, donor selection for favorable anatomy is required for both the donor and recipient.

Prognostic stratification of patients with colorectal cancer liver metastasis based solely on tumor-related factors has only moderate discriminatory ability. We hypothesized that the inclusion of nontumor related factors can improve prediction of long-term prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer liver metastasis.Nontumor related laboratory markers were assessed utilizing a training cohort from 2 U.S. institutions (n = 1,205). Factors independently associated with prognosis were used to develop a nontumor related prognostic score. The discriminatory ability, assessed by Harrell's C-statistics (C-index) and net reclassification improvement, was validated and compared with 3 commonly used tumor-related clinical risk scores: Fong clinical risk scores, m-clinical risk scores, and Genetic and Morphological Evaluation (GAME) score in an external validation cohort from 5 Asian (n = 1,307) and 3 European (n = 1,058) institutions. The discriminatory ability of nontumor related prognostic score combined with each of these 3 tumor-related prognostic scores was also estimated.Alkaline phosphatase (hazard ratio 1.43; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.84), albumin (hazard ratio 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.57-0.89), and mean corpuscular volume (hazard ratio 19.0, per log unit; 95% confidence interval, 4.79-75.0) were each independently associated with increased risk of death after resection of colorectal cancer liver metastasis (all P.05). In turn, alkaline phosphatase, albumin, and mean corpuscular volume were combined to form a nontumor related prognostic score (2.942 × mean corpuscular volume + 0.399 × alkaline phosphatase-0.339 × albumin-12) × 10 (median, 16; range, 1-30). The nontumor related prognostic score had good-to-modest discriminatory ability in the external cohort (C-index = 0.58), which was comparable to the 3 established tumor-related prognostic scores (C-index: Fong clinical risk scores, 0.53, m-clinical risk scores, 0.55, GAME, 0.58). The addition of the nontumor related prognostic score to the tumor-related prognostic scores enhanced the discriminatory ability in the entire study cohort (C-index: nontumor related score+Fong, 0.60, nontumor related score+m-clinical risk scores, 0.61, nontumor related score+GAME, 0.64), as well reclassification improvement (42.5, 42.7%, and 21.2%, respectively).Nontumor related prognostic information may help improve the prognostic stratification of patients after resection of colorectal cancer liver metastasis. The nontumor related prognostic score may be combined with tumor-related prognostic tools to enhance prognostic stratification of patients with colorectal cancer liver metastasis.

Although interest in expanding the application of minimally invasive liver resection (MILR) is high the world over, most of the extensive experience in MILR has been reported from Far East Asia and Europe and its adoption in North America is limited. The aim of this study was to review the experience of MILR in a single North American institute over a 15-year period, highlighting both the obstacles encountered and strategies adopted to overcome the stagnation in its uptake.This study included 500 MILR cases between 2006 and 2020. Patient demographics, disease characteristics, surgical technique, and perioperative outcomes are summarized. The major hepatectomy rate and conversion rate were assessed according to case numbers (first 100, 101-300, and 301-500 cases) to assess chronological trends.Of 500, 402 MILRs were done by pure laparoscopic (80.4%), 67 were hand assisted (13.4%), and 31 were robotic (6.2%). The majority (64%) of cases were performed for malignancy (n = 320; 100 Hepatocellular carcinoma, 153 Colorectal metastases, 27 Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and others, 40, 64%). A total of 71 cases were converted to open (14.2%). The annual case number gradually increased over the first few years; however, case numbers stayed around 30 between 2009 and 2017. In this period, despite accumulating MILR experience, open conversion rates increased despite no change in major hepatectomy rate. After this period of long-term stagnation, we introduced crucial changes in team composition and laparoscopic instrumentation. Our MILR case number and major hepatectomy rate thereafter increased significantly without increasing conversion or complication rates.Our recovery from long-term stagnation by instituting key changes as detailed in this study could be used as a guidepost for programs that are contemplating transitioning their MILR program from minor to advanced resections. Establishing a formal MILR training model through proper mentorship/proctorship and building a dedicated MILR team would be imperative to this strategy.

The persistent shortage of liver allografts contributes to significant waitlist mortality despite efforts to increase organ donation. Normothermic machine perfusion holds the potential to enhance graft preservation, extend viability, and allow liver function evaluation in organs previously discarded because considered too high-risk for transplant.Discarded livers from other transplant centers were transplanted after assessment and reconditioning with our institutionally developed normothermic machine perfusion device. We report here our preliminary data.Twenty-one human livers declined for transplantation were enrolled for assessment with normothermic machine perfusion. Six livers (28.5%) were ultimately discarded after normothermic machine perfusion because of insufficient lactate clearance (4.1 mmol/L after 4 hours), limited bile production (0.5 mI/h), or moderate macrosteatosis, whereas 15 (71.5%) were considered suitable for transplantation. Normothermic machine perfusion duration was from 3 hours, 49 minutes to 10 hours, 29 minutes without technical problems or adverse events. No intraoperative or major early postoperative complications occurred in all transplanted recipients. No primary nonfunction occurred after transplantation. Seven livers had early allograft dysfunction with fast recovery, and 1 patient developed ischemic cholangiopathy after 4 months treated with biliary stents. All other patients had good liver function with a follow-up time of 8 weeks to 14 months.In total, 71.5% of discarded livers subjected to ex vivo normothermic machine perfusion were successfully transplanted after organ perfusion and assessment using an institutionally built device. This study challenges the current viability criteria reported in the literature and calls for a standardization of viability markers collection, an essential condition for the advancement of the field.

Introduction: Sorafenib is the standard care for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT), though it offers limited survival. This study was designed to compare clinical outcomes between liver resection (surgery) and transarterial chemoembolization plus radiotherapy (TACE-RT) as the initial treatment modality for resectable treatment-naïve solitary HCC combined with subsegmental (Vp1), segmental (Vp2), and lobar (Vp3) PVTT. Methods: From the institutional HCC registry, we identified 116 patients diagnosed with resectable treatment-naïve HCC with Vp1–Vp3 PVTT based on radiologic images who received surgery (n = 44) or TACE-RT (n = 72) as a primary treatment between 2010 and 2015. A propensity score matching (PSM) model was created. Results: The TACE-RT group had a higher tumor burden (tumor size, extent, and markers) than the surgery group. Cumulative patient survival curve in the surgery group was significantly higher than that in the TACE-RT group before and after PSM. Liver function was relatively well preserved in the surgery group compared with the TACE-RT group. TACE-RT group, male, increased alkaline phosphatase, and increased platelet count were predisposing factors for patient death in resectable treatment-naïve solitary HCC with PVTT. Discussion/Conclusion: The present study suggests that surgery is considered as an initial treatment in selectively resectable treatment-naïve solitary HCC with Vp1–Vp3 PVTT.

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to assess the utility of laparoscopic ultrasound (LUS) during minimally invasive liver procedures in patients with malignant liver tumors who underwent preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS Medical records of patients with malignant liver lesions who underwent laparoscopic liver surgery between October 2005 and January 2018 and who underwent an MRI examination at our institution within a month before surgery were collected from a prospectively maintained database. The size and location of tumors detected on LUS, as well as whether they were seen on preoperative imaging, were recorded. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify factors that were associated with the detection of liver lesions on LUS that were not seen on preoperative MRI. RESULTS A total of 467 lesions were identified in 147 patients. Tumor types included colorectal cancer metastasis (n = 53), hepatocellular cancer (n = 38), neuroendocrine metastasis (n = 23), and others (n = 33). Procedures included ablation (67%), resection (23%), combined resection and ablation (6%), and diagnostic laparoscopy with biopsy (4%). LUS identified 39 additional lesions (8.4%) that were not seen on preoperative MRI in 14 patients (10%). These were colorectal cancer (n = 20, 51%), neuroendocrine (n = 11, 28%) and other metastases (n = 8, 21%). These additional findings on LUS changed the treatment plan in 13 patients (8.8%). Factors predicting tumor detection on LUS but not on MRI included obesity (p = 0.02), previous exposure to chemotherapy (p

There are currently no guidelines pertaining to ERAS pathways in living donor hepatectomy.To identify whether surgical technique influences immediate and short-term outcomes after living liver donation surgery DATA SOURCES: : Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Central.Systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines and recommendations using the GRADE approach derived from an international expert panel (CRD42021260707). Endpoints were mortality, overall complications, serious complications, bile eaks, pulmonary complications, estimated blood loss and length of stay.Of the 2410 screened articles, 21 articles were included for final analysis; 3 observational, 13 retrospective cohort, 4 prospective cohort studies and 1 randomized trial. Overall complications were higher with right versus left hepatectomy (26.8 vs 20.8%; OR 1.4, p = 0.010). Donors after left hepatectomy had shorter length of stay (MD 1.4 days) compared to right hepatectomy. There was no difference in outcomes after right donor hepatectomy with versus without middle hepatic vein. We had limited data on the influence of incision type and minimally-invasive approaches on living donor outcomes, and no data on the effect of operative time on donor outcomes.Left donor hepatectomy should be preferred over right hepatectomy as it is related to improved donor short-term outcomes (QOE; Moderate | Grade of Recommendation; Strong). Right donor hepatectomy with or without MHV has equivalent outcomes (QOE; Moderate | Grade of Recommendation; Strong); no preference is recommended, decision should be based on program's experience and expertise. No difference in outcomes was observed related to incision type, minimally invasive vs open (QOE; Low | Grade of Recommendation; Weak); no preference can be recommended. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Introduction Diffuse splanchnic vein thrombosis (DSVT) remains a serious challenge in liver transplantation (LT). Reno-portal anastomosis (RPA) has previously been reported as a valid option for management of patients with DSVT during LT. The aim of this study was to evaluate posttransplant renal function and surgical outcomes of patients with DSVT who underwent RPA during LT. Methods Between January 2005 and December 2017, 1,270 patients underwent LT at our institution, including 16 with DSVT managed with RPA (RPA group). We compared renal function and surgical outcomes in these patients to outcomes in 48 propensity-score (PS) matched patients without thrombosis (control group), using a 1:3 matching model. Results The two groups had similar rates of postoperative portal vein thrombosis (PVT), renal dysfunction as measured by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and overall postoperative complications (Clavien grade III), although the RPA group had a higher incidence of postoperative upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding (31.3% vs 4.2%; p=0.009) that had no clinical consequence. There were no significant differences in five-year graft and patient survival rates between the groups (p=0.133 and p=0.166, respectively). Conclusion RPA is an established technique in the management of patients with DSVT during LT, with comparable outcomes to patients without thrombosis. Our report is the first to demonstrate similar surgical outcomes, including long-term renal function, in LT recipients with or without RPA.

This study is designed to analyze the feasibility of laparoscopic living donor right hemihepatectomy in living donors with portal vein variation. Living donor liver transplantation cases using a right liver graft during the period of January 2014 to September 2019 were included. Computed tomographic angiographies of the donor were 3-dimensionally reconstructed, and the anatomical variation of the portal vein was classified. To reduce selection bias, a 1:1 ratio propensity score-matched analysis between the laparoscopy group and the open group was performed. Surgical and recovery-related outcomes as well as portal vein complication-free survival, graft survival, and overall survival rates were analyzed. After matching, 171 cases in each group from 444 original cases were compared. The laparoscopy group had a shorter operation time (P < 0.001), a smaller number of additional opioids required by the donor (P < 0.001), and a shorter hospital stay (P < 0.001). There were no differences in the portal vein complication-free survival (P = 0.16), graft survival (P = 0.26), or overall survival rates (P = 0.53). Although portal vein complication-free survival was inferior in portal veins other than type I (P = 0.01), the laparoscopy group showed similar portal vein complication-free survival regardless of the anatomical variation of portal vein (P = 0.35 in type I and P = 0.30 in other types). Laparoscopic living donor right hemihepatectomy can be performed as safely as open surgery regardless of the anatomical variation of the portal vein.

Objective The Expert Consensus Guidelines initiative on MIDH for LDLT was organized with the goal of safe implementation and development of these complex techniques with donor safety as the main priority. Background Following the development of minimally invasive liver surgery, techniques of MIDH were developed with the aim of reducing the short- and long-term consequences of the procedure on liver donors. These techniques, although increasingly performed, lack clinical guidelines. Methods A group of 12 international MIDH experts, 1 research coordinator, and 8 junior faculty was assembled. Comprehensive literature search was made and studies classified using the SIGN method. Based on literature review and experts opinions, tentative recommendations were made by experts subgroups and submitted to the whole experts group using on-line Delphi Rounds with the goal of obtaining >90% Consensus. Pre-conference meeting formulated final recommendations that were presented during the plenary conference held in Seoul on September 7, 2019 in front of a Validation Committee composed of LDLT experts not practicing MIDH and an international audience. Results Eighteen Clinical Questions were addressed resulting in 44 recommendations. All recommendations reached at least a 90% consensus among experts and were afterward endorsed by the validation committee. Conclusions The Expert Consensus on MIDH has produced a set of clinical guidelines based on available evidence and clinical expertise. These guidelines are presented for a safe implementation and development of MIDH in LDLT Centers with the goal of optimizing donor safety, donor care, and recipient outcomes.

There is much controversy regarding enhanced recovery for recipients of liver transplants from deceased and living donors. The objectives of this Review were to summarise current knowledge on individual enhanced recovery elements on short-term outcomes, identify key components for comprehensive pathways, and create internationally accepted guidelines on enhanced recovery for liver-transplant recipients. The ERAS4OLT.org collaborative partnered by the International Liver Transplantation Society performed systematic literature reviews on the effect of 32 relevant enhanced perioperative recovery elements on short-term outcomes, and global specialists prepared expert statements on deceased and living donor liver transplantation. The Grading Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations approach was used for rating of quality of evidence and grading of recommendations. A virtual international consensus conference was held in January, 2022, in which results were presented, voted on by the audience, and discussed by an independent international jury of eight members, applying the Danish model of consensus. 273 liver transplantation specialists from 30 countries prepared expert statements on elements of enhanced recovery for liver transplantation based on the systematic literature reviews. The consensus conference yielded 80 final recommendations, covering aspects of enhanced recovery for preoperative assessment and optimisation, intraoperative surgical and anaesthetic conduct, and postoperative management for the recipients of liver transplants from both deceased and living donors, and for the living donor. The recommendations represent a comprehensive overview of the relevant elements and areas of enhanced recovery for liver transplantation. These internationally established guidelines could direct the development of enhanced recovery programmes worldwide, allowing adjustments according to local resources and practices.

BACKGROUND Laparoscopic donor hepatectomy (LDH) for living donor liver transplantation has been performed in several specialized institutes. Surgical outcomes of LDH have shown comparable results to open donor hepatectomy (ODH), but the quality of life (QOL) after LDH is not known. This prospective questionnaire-based study was performed to assess health status and QOL of live liver donors before and after donor hepatectomy (DH). MATERIAL AND METHODS From May 2017 to February 2020, questionnaire items such as the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery mobility scale (EMS), Body Image Questionnaire, and EQ-5D-3L were examined up to 1 year after DH to respectively evaluate postoperative recovery, body image satisfaction, and health status. RESULTS During the study period, 45 laparoscopic DH (LDH) donors and 2 open DH (ODH) donors were finally fully evaluated. The LDH group had a significantly higher mean EMS than ODH on postoperative day (POD) 5, and 7 (P=0.011, and P=0.004, respectively). Body image scores of the LDH group were significantly higher than that of the ODH group at 1 month after DH (17.8 vs 15.0, P=0.017). There were 45 LDH donors who recovered to preoperative values at 6 months and 1 month after DH, with no statistically significant difference in EQ-5D-3L index value and visual analogue scale (P=0.059 and P=0.217, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Within 1 month after DH, LDH donors showed faster mobility recovery and body image satisfaction to the level of preoperative status than ODH. LDH donors recovered to preoperative health status within 6 months, in accordance with previous studies of ODH donors.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt has been established as an effective treatment for complicated portal hypertension. This retrospective study investigated the effect of pretransplant transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement on intraoperative graft hemodynamics and surgical outcomes after liver transplantation.Of 1,081 patients who underwent liver transplantation between January 2007 and June 2017 at Cleveland Clinic (OH, USA), 130 patients had transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement before liver transplant. We performed a 1:2 propensity score matching to compare intraoperative graft hemodynamics and surgical outcomes between the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt group (n = 130) and the no-transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt group (n = 260).The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt did not increase operative time, the volume of blood transfusion, duration of hospital stay, or complication rates. Graft and patient survivals were similar between the groups. Mean intraoperative cardiac output and graft portal flow in the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt group were greater than in the no-transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt group (P = .03 and P = .003, respectively). In multivariate analysis, male sex, younger age, low platelet count, absence of portal vein thrombosis, and pretransplant transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement were independently associated with increased portal flow volume (Por = 0.03 each). Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt malposition was observed in 17 patients (13.1%). The 1-year patient survival was 70.6% with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt malposition and 92.0% without transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt malposition (P = .01).Our findings suggest that pretransplant transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement increases graft portal flow but does not compromise surgical outcomes after liver transplantation. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt malposition, however, is not uncommon and may increase the complexity of transplantation.

Acute liver failure is a rare but life-threatening medical emergency. Despite advancements in medical management, mortality rates of acute liver failure remain high. Currently, liver transplant is the only definitive therapeutic option available. High-volume plasma exchange has been shown to increase transplant-free survival in patients with acute liver failure before liver transplant. However, the occurrence of infectious complications in patients who receive this treatment has not been well studied. We report 2 cases of severe opportunistic infections occurring within 30 days of transplant in patients who underwent high-volume plasma exchange before liver transplant.

Backgrounds/Aims While minimal invasive surgery has become popular, the feasibility of laparoscopy for liver cavernous hemangioma has not been shown. Methods Patients who underwent hepatectomy for liver cavernous hemangioma from January 2008 to February 2019 at the Samsung Medical Center were reviewed. Patients who underwent trisectionectomy were excluded. Background characteristics, along with operative and postoperative recovery, were compared between the laparoscopy and open surgery groups. Results Forty-three patients in the laparoscopy group and 33 patients in the open surgery group were compared. The differences in the background characteristics were presence of symptoms (14.6% in laparoscopy vs. 57.1% in open, p

BACKGROUND This study was designed to analyze the risk of extra-anatomical portal vein reconstruction during liver transplantation (LT) in patient with portal vein thrombosis (PVT). METHODS Patients who underwent LT between 2008 and 2018 were reviewed. PVT was graded according to the Yerdel system. Risk factor for portal vein complication-free, graft and overall survival were analyzed with multivariate Cox regression. RESULTS Seventy out of 1180 patients had PVT. Number of patients who underwent extra-anatomical reconstruction were three (13.0%), three (15.0%), and six (50.0%) with grade II, III and IV thrombosis, respectively. Grade III patients with extra-anatomical reconstruction (HR 10.212, CI 2.475-42.133, P = .001), grade IV with both anatomical (HR 16.991, CI 5.224-54.740, P

Objective Evaluating the perioperative outcomes of minimally invasive (MIV) donor hepatectomy for adult live donor liver transplants in a large multi-institutional series from both Eastern and Western centers. Background Laparoscopic liver resection has become standard practice for minor resections in selected patients in whom it provides reduced postoperative morbidity and faster rehabilitation. Laparoscopic approaches in living donor hepatectomy for transplantation, however, remain controversial because of safety concerns. Following the recommendation of the Jury of the Morioka consensus conference to address this, a retrospective study was designed to assess the early postoperative outcomes after laparoscopic donor hepatectomy. The collective experience of 10 mature transplant teams from Eastern and Western countries was reviewed. Methods All centers provided data from prospectively maintained databases. Only left and right hepatectomies performed using a MIV technique were included in this study. Primary outcome was the occurrence of complications using the Clavien-Dindo graded classification and the Comprehensive Complication Index during the first 3 months. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for complications. Results In all, 412 MIV donor hepatectomies were recorded including 164 left and 248 right hepatectomies. Surgical technique was either pure laparoscopy in 175 cases or hybrid approach in 237. Conversion into standard laparotomy was necessary in 17 donors (4.1%). None of the donors died. Also, 108 experienced 121 complications including 9.4% of severe (Clavien-Dindo 3-4) complications. Median Comprehensive Complication Index was 5.2. Conclusions This study shows favorable early postoperative outcomes in more than 400 MIV donor hepatectomy from 10 experienced centers. These results are comparable to those of benchmarking series of open standard donor hepatectomy.

Normothermic machine perfusion provides continuous perfusion to ex situ hepatic grafts through the portal vein and the hepatic artery. Because the portal vein has high flow with low pressure and the hepatic artery has low flow with high pressure, different types of perfusion machines have been employed to match the two vessels' infusion hemodynamics.We compared transplanted human livers perfused through a 2-pump (n = 9) versus a 1-pump perfusion system (n = 6) where a C-clamp is used as a tubing constrictor to regulate hemodynamics.There was no significant difference between groups in portal vein or hepatic artery flow rate. The 1-pump group had more hemoglobin in the perfusate. However, there was no significant difference in plasma hemoglobin between the 2-pump and 1-pump groups at each time point or in the change in levels, proving no hemolysis occurred due to C-clamp tube constriction. After transplantation, the 2-pump group had two cases of early allograft dysfunction (EAD), whereas the 1-pump group had no EAD. There was no graft failure or patient death in either group during follow-up ranging from 20-52 months.Our data show that the 1-pump design provided the same hemodynamic output as the 2-pump design, with no additional hemolytic risk, but with the benefits of lower costs, easier transport and faster and simpler setting.

Purpose Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is rare in HCV patients without cirrhosis, and little is known about the postoperative results of these patients. The present study compares the outcomes of cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic groups after liver resection (LR) in solitary HCV-related HCC patients and identifies risk factors for prognosis according to the presence or absence of cirrhosis in these patients. Methods Two hundred and 7 adult hepatectomy patients with treatment-naïve solitary HCV-related HCC were identified prospectively at our institution between July 2005 and May 2019. Results The non-cirrhotic group had better liver function than the cirrhotic group based on platelet count, liver function tests, liver stiffness measurement, and indocyanine green retention rate at 15 minutes but were older than the cirrhotic group. Consistently, noninvasive markers in the cirrhotic group were significantly higher than in the non-cirrhotic group. The cumulative disease-free survival and overall survival in the non-cirrhotic group were significantly higher than in the cirrhotic group. HCC recurrence was related to major LR and α-FP of >40 ng/mL and death was related to long hospitalization and α-FP of >40 ng/mL in multivariate analysis. Noninvasive markers and the presence of cirrhosis were not related to HCC recurrence or death in multivariate analyses. Conclusion The cirrhotic group showed poor prognosis due to poor liver function after LR compared to the non-cirrhotic group, but this was not sustained in multivariate analysis. The factors influencing HCC recurrence and death were different in the cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic groups.

The feasibility and learning curve of laparoscopic living donor right hepatectomy was assessed.Donors who underwent right hepatectomy performed by a single surgeon were reviewed. Comparisons between open and laparoscopy regarding operative outcomes, including number of bile duct openings in the graft, were performed using propensity score matching.From 2014 to 2018, 103 and 96 donors underwent laparoscopic and open living donor right hepatectomy respectively, of whom 64 donors from each group were matched. Mean(s.d.) duration of operation (252·2(41·9) versus 304·4(66·5) min; P 0·001) and median duration of hospital stay (8 versus 10 days; P = 0·002) were shorter in the laparoscopy group. There was no difference in complication rates of donors (P = 0·298) or recipients (P = 0·394) between the two groups. Total time for laparoscopy decreased linearly (RLaparoscopic living donor right hepatectomy is feasible and an experience of approximately 50 cases may surpass the learning curve.Se evaluó la viabilidad y la curva de aprendizaje de la hepatectomía derecha de donante vivo MÉTODOS: Se llevó a cabo una revisión de los donantes sometidos a hepatectomía derecha por un único cirujano. Las comparaciones entre el abordaje abierto y laparoscópico con respecto a los resultados operatorios, incluyendo el número of aberturas de los conductos biliares en el injerto se realizó utilizando un análisis de emparejamiento por puntaje de propensión.Desde 2014 a 2018, 96 y 103 donantes fueron sometidos a hepatectomía derecho de donante vivo por cirugía abierta y laparoscópica, respectivamente, de los cuales 64 donantes fueron emparejados para ambos grupos. La media del tiempo operatorio (304,3 ± 66,5 versus 252,2 ± 41,9 minutos, P0,001) y la mediana de la estancia hospitalaria fueron más cortas en el grupo de cirugía laparoscópica (10 versus 8 días, P = 0,002). No hubo diferencias entre ambos grupos en las tasas de complicaciones de los donantes (P = 0,298) o receptores (P = 0,394). El tiempo total de la laparoscopia disminuyó linealmente (R2= 0,407, β = -0,914, P = 0,001) y esta disminución comenzó a partir aproximadamente de los 50 casos realizados cuando los casos fueron divididos en cuatro cuartiles (segundo a tercero y tercero a cuarto, P = 0,001 y P = 0,023, respectivamente). Aunque los injertos con aperturas de los conductos biliares fueron más numerosos en el grupo laparoscópico (P = 0,022), no se hallaron diferencias en los dos últimos cuartiles (P = 0,207). CONCLUSIÓN: La hepatectomía derecha de donante vivo por vía laparoscópica es viable, y una experiencia de aproximadamente 50 casos, puede superar la curva de aprendizaje.

This study was designed to analyze the feasibility of extra-anatomical hepatic artery (HA) reconstruction in living donor liver transplantation (LT).Patients who underwent their first living donor LT at our center between January 2008 and December 2017 were reviewed. HA reconstruction was classified as anatomical or extra-anatomical reconstruction (EAR). We compared the background characteristics and posttransplantation outcomes, including complications, biliary complications, graft survival, and overall survival. The potential risk factors for bile leakage were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression, while risk factors for biliary stricture-free survival, graft survival, and overall survival were analyzed using multivariable Cox regression.Among 800 patients, 35 (4.4%) underwent EAR, of whom 7 (7/35, 20.0%) experienced HA complications after the initial anatomical reconstruction and required EAR during reoperation. Patients who underwent EAR (n = 2/35, 5.7%) had a similar rate of HA complications compared with those who underwent anatomical reconstruction (n = 46/772, 5.9%, P = 0.699). EAR was a significant risk factor for bile leakage (odds ratio [OR], 4.167; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.928-9.006; P0.001) along with multiple bile ducts (OR, 1.606; 95% CI, 1.022-2.526; P = 0.040) and hepaticojejunostomy (OR, 4.108; 95% CI, 2.190-7.707; P0.001). However, EAR had no statistical relationship to biliary stricture-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.602; 95% CI, 0.982-2.613; P = 0.059), graft survival (HR, 1.745; 95% CI, 0.741-4.109; P = 0.203), or overall survival (HR, 1.405; 95% CI, 0.786-2.513; P = 0.251). HA complications were associated with poor biliary stricture-free survival (HR, 2.060; 95% CI, 1.329-3.193; P = 0.001), graft survival (HR, 5.549; 95% CI, 2.883-10.681; P0.001), and overall survival (HR, 1.958; 95% CI, 1.195-3.206; P = 0.008).Extra-anatomical HA reconstruction during living donor LT was not a risk factor for biliary stricture, graft failure, or overall survival.

Background/Aims: Biliary strictures remain one of the most challenging aspects after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). The aim of this study was to assess long-term out ­come of endoscopic treatment of biliary strictures occurring after LDLT and to identify risk factors of recurrent biliary stric­ tures following endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage (ERBD) in LDLT. Methods: A total of 1,106 patients underwent LDLT from May 1995 to May 2014. We compared the risk factors between patients with and without recurrent biliary strictures. Results: Biliary strictures developed in 24.0% of patients. Technical success rate of ERBD for biliary stricture after LDLT was 66.2% (145/219). Among 145 patients managed by endoscopic drainage, stricture resolution occurred in 69 with median duration of stent indwelling of 13.6 months (range, 0.5 to 67.3 months), and stricture recurrence was seen in 20 (21.3%) out of 94. The median recurrence-free duration after final endoscopic success was 13.1 months (range, 0.5 to 67.3 months). Older donor age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03 to 1.17; p=0.004) and non-B, non-C liver cirrhosis (HR, 5.10; 95% CI, 1.10 to 25.00; p=0.043) were associated with higher recurrence of biliary stricture. Conclusions: Long-term stricture resolution rate after ERBD insertion for biliary stricture occurring after LDLT was 73.4%. Clinicians should pay careful attention during following-up to decide when to remove ERBD in patients who have factors associated with recurrent biliary strictures. (Gut Liver 2020;14:125-134)

Background: Prolonged-release tacrolimus is associated with better long-term graft and patient survival than the immediate-release formulation in liver transplant patients. However, no clinical data are available to assess the efficacy and safety of early conversion from twice-daily, immediate-release tacrolimus to once-daily, prolonged-release tacrolimus in de novo liver transplant recipients in Korea. Methods: A 24-week, randomized, open-label study was conducted in 36 liver transplant recipients. All patients received immediate-release tacrolimus (0.1-0.2 mg/kg/day, divided into two doses) for 4 weeks after transplantation, at which time 50% of the patients were converted, at a ratio of 1 mg to 1 mg, to prolonged-release tacrolimus (once-daily). The primary efficacy endpoint was the incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (BCAR) from weeks 4 to 24 after transplantation (per-protocol set). Medication adherence, adverse event profiles, laboratory tests, vital signs, and physical changes were also recorded. Results: BCAR frequency at 24 weeks was similar between the two treatment groups; two cases (mean±standard deviation, 0.14±0.53 cases) of BCAR were reported in one patient treated with prolonged-release tacrolimus (n=14), while no such cases were reported among patients treated with immediate-release tacrolimus (n=12). The tacrolimus blood concentration at weeks 12 and 24, medication adherence, and adverse event profiles were also similar between the formulations, with no unusual laboratory test results, vital signs, or physical changes reported. Conclusions: Early conversion to a simplified, once-daily, prolonged-release tacrolimus regimen may be an effective treatment option for liver transplant recipients in Korea. Larger-scale studies are warranted to confirm non-inferiority to immediate-release tacrolimus formulation in de novo liver transplant recipients.

Many institutions have started or are planning to start a purely laparoscopic right hepatectomy (PLRH) for adult living donor recipients but the experience is relatively very limited. The present review will look at the current status of PLRH and go over some of the technical details important for a safe operation. Necessary elements and different strategies to start a safe and reproducible PLRH program will be discussed.Several publications with a relatively large number of cases have been published in the last few years. The initial results of PLRH seem to be comparable to open donor hepatectomy when performed by surgeons with sufficient expertise laparoscopic and donor hepatectomy.With the ongoing accumulation of experience in laparoscopic liver surgery and living donor liver transplantation, it is most likely that PLRH will be performed more widely than the present time. Institutions should implement a step-by-step approach with proctorship, standardization of surgical procedures and a balanced selection criterion for donors for a safe transition from open method to a PLRH program.

Most management guidelines and much of the available clinical trial evidence for immunosuppressants in liver transplantation (LT) pertain to Western practice. While evidence from Western studies may not translate to Asian settings, there is a paucity of Asian randomized controlled trials of immunosuppression in liver recipients. Nonetheless, there are notable differences in the indications and procedures for LT between Western and Asian settings. The Asian Liver Transplant Network held its inaugural meeting in Singapore in November 2016 and aimed to provide an Asian perspective on aspects of immunosuppression following LT. Because of their importance to outcome following LT, the meeting focused on (1) reducing the impact of renal toxicity, (2) hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence, and (3) nonadherence with immunosuppressant therapy.

BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility of using intraoperative ultrasonography as a guidance in dividing bile duct during laparoscopic donor hepatectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS Cases of living liver donors who underwent laparoscopic living donor hepatectomy from May 2013 to December 2017 were reviewed. Operative and postoperative data were compared between donors with intraoperative ultrasonography and donors with intraoperative cholangiography. For analyzing whether bile duct division was performed successfully, anatomical type and number of bile duct openings were reviewed. When the number of bile ducts were achieved as expected, it was considered "successful". RESULTS Intraoperative cholangiography was used in 67 donors (62.6%) while intraoperative ultrasonography was used in 36 donors (33.6%). Mean operation time was 405.0±76.2 minutes versus 275.1±37.5 minutes, P

Donation after circulatory death (DCD) liver transplantation improves deceased donor liver use and decreases waitlist burden, albeit at an increased risk of biliary complications and inferior graft survival. Employing liver vascular inflow measurements intraoperatively permits allograft prognostication. However, its use in DCD liver transplantation is hitherto largely unknown and further explored here. DCD liver transplantation patient records at a single center from 2005 to 2018 were retrospectively scrutinized. Intraoperative flow data and relevant donor parameters were analyzed against endpoints of biliary events and graft survival. A total of 138 cases were chosen. The incidence of cumulative biliary complications was 38%, the majority of which were anastomotic strictures and managed successfully by endoscopic means. The ischemic cholangiopathy rate was 6%. At median thresholds of a portal vein (PV) flow rate of92 mL/minute/100 g and buffer capacity (BC) of0.04, both variables were independently associated with risk of biliary events (P = 0.01 and 0.04, respectively). Graft survival was 90% at 12 months and 75% at 5 years. Cox regression analysis revealed a PV flow rate of50 mL/minute/100 g as predictive of poorer graft survival (P = 0.01). Furthermore, 126 of these DCD livers were analyzed against a propensity-matched group of 378 contemporaneous donation after brain death liver allografts (1:3), revealing significantly higher rates (P 0.001) of both early allograft dysfunction (70% versus 30%) and biliary complications (37% versus 20%) in the former group. Although flow data were comparable between both sets, PV flow and BC were predictive of biliary events only in the DCD cohort. Intraoperative inflow measurements therefore provide valuable prognostication on biliary/graft outcomes in DCD liver transplantation, can help inform graft surveillance, and its routine use is recommended.

Purpose Little is known about liver resection (LR) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients older than 75 years of age. This study aimed to compare the postoperative and long-term outcomes of hepatectomy in this patient population according to operation period. Methods This study included 130 elderly patients who underwent LR for solitary treatment-naive HCC between November 1998 and March 2020. Group 1 included patients who underwent LR before 2016 (n = 68) and group 2 included those who underwent LR during or after 2016 (n = 62). Results The proportion of major LR, anatomical LR, and laparoscopic LR (LLR) in group 1 was significantly lower than those in group 2. Also, the median operation time, amount of blood loss, hospitalization length, rates of intraoperative blood transfusion, and complications in group 2 were less than those in group 1. In the subgroup analysis of group 1, high proteins induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II, long hospitalization, and LLR were closely associated with mortality. In the subgroup analysis of group 2, however, none of the factors increased mortality. Nevertheless, the presence of tumor grade 3 or 4 and the incidence of microvascular invasion were higher in group 1 than in group 2, and the disease-free survival and overall survival were better in group 2 than in group 1 because of minimized blood loss and quicker recovery period by increased surgical techniques and anatomical approach, and LLR. Conclusion LR in elderly HCC patients has been frequently performed recently, and the outcomes have improved significantly compared to the past.

Introduction Two novel clinical risk scores (CRS) that incorporate KRAS mutation status (modified CRS (mCRS) and GAME score) were developed. However, they have not been tested in large national and international cohorts. The aim of this study was to validate the prognostic discrimination utility and determine the clinical usefulness of the two novel CRS. Methods Patients undergoing hepatectomy for CRLM (2000-2018) in ten centers were included. The discriminatory abilities of mCRS, GAME, and Fong CRS were evaluated using Harrel's C-index and Akaike's Information Criterion. Results In the entire cohort, the C-index of the GAME score (0.61) was significantly higher than those of Fong score (0.57) and mCRS (0.54), while the C-Index of mCRS was significantly lower than that of Fong score. When we compared the models in the various geographical regions, the C-index of GAME score was significantly higher than that of mCRS in North America, Europe, and South America. The AIC of Fong score, mCRS, and GAME score were 14405, 14447, and 14319, respectively. Conclusion In conclusion, using the largest and most heterogenous population of CRLM patients with known KRAS status, this independent, external validation demonstrated that the GAME score outperforms both the traditional Fong score and mCRS.