Search

To look at markers to differentiate ocular sarcoidosis from ocular tuberculosis in a high TB endemic population. Retrospective multicenter study involving seven tertiary eyecare centers in India between July 2016 to December 2016. Demographic, clinical and laboratory data were retrieved from respective hospital databases. Group A included biopsy-proven ocular sarcoidosis while group B included ocular tuberculosis. Data from 2726 consecutive patients with uveitis were retrieved from the databases. Group A had 61 cases while group B included 307 cases. The mean age in group A was 43 ± 16.55 years while in group B was 38 ± 13.13 years. Females were more common in group A. Uveitis with low Schirmer test (OR-30, CI-95%), candlewax retinal vasculitis (OR-8.69, CI-95%), hilar lymphadenopathy (OR-15.23, CI-95%), fissural nodules (OR-39.11, CI-95%) had higher odds of having ocular sarcoidosis. Presence of dry eye, candlewax retinal vasculitis, hilar lymphadenopathy, and fissural nodules if present in a patient with uveitis, could help differentiate ocular sarcoidosis from ocular tuberculosis in a high TB endemic population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To study whether a customized elliptical flap configuration offers any visual, refractive, or biomechanical advantage over the "conventional" circular flaps in patients undergoing myopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).Methods: A prospective interventional contralateral eye study was undertaken enrolling 290 eyes of 145 myopic patients (≤-6.0D) undergoing LASIK, wherein the corneal flap was created in one eye using a customized elliptical flap configuration versus a conventional circular flap configuration in the other eye. Postoperatively, we compared the visual outcome, change in higher-order aberrations, corneal asphericity, and corneal biomechanics.Results: The visual outcomes, including higher-order aberrations, were comparable between the two groups. Changes in spherical aberration (mean: 0.234-0.331 versus 0.234-0.42; P = 0.644), corneal asphericity (-0.32-0.34 versus - 0.34-0.45; P = 0.42), corneal hysteresis (9.35-7.33 versus 9.4-6.71, P = 0.489), corneal resistance factor (9.71-7.40 versus 10.38-6.9, P = 0.181) were comparable between the elliptical and circular groups, respectively.Conclusion: We evaluated the usefulness of a customized elliptical flap configuration for performing LASIK surgery. Our data suggests that elliptical flaps may be associated with superior visual and biomechanical performance compared to circular flaps. This is certainly relevant in eyes with "borderline" pre-LASIK profile to improve patient satisfaction and safety after surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]