Search

BACKGROUND A large proportion of the prison population experiences substance use disorders (SUDs), which are associated with poor physical and mental health, social marginalization, and economic disadvantage. Despite the global situation characterized by the incarceration of large numbers of people with SUD and the health problems associated with SUD, people in prison are underrepresented in public health research. OBJECTIVE The overall objective of the PriSUD (Diagnosing and Treating Substance Use Disorders in Prison)-Nordic project is to develop new knowledge that will contribute to better mental and physical health, improved quality of life, and better life expectancies among people with SUD in prison. METHODS PriSUD-Nordic is based on a multidisciplinary mixed method approach, including the methodological perspectives of both quantitative and qualitative methods. The qualitative part includes ethnographic fieldwork and semistructured interviews. The quantitative part is a registry-based cohort study including national registry data from Norway, Denmark, and Sweden. The national prison cohorts will comprise approximately 500,000 individuals and include all people imprisoned in Norway, Sweden, and Demark during the period from 2000 to 2019. The project will investigate the prison population during three different time periods: before imprisonment, during imprisonment, and after release. RESULTS PriSUD-Nordic was funded by The Research Council of Norway in December 2019, and funding started in 2020. Data collection is ongoing and will be completed in the first quarter of 2022. Data will be analyzed in spring 2022 and the results will be disseminated in 2022-2023. The PriSUD-Nordic project has formal ethical approval related to all work packages. CONCLUSIONS PriSUD-Nordic will be the first research project to investigate the epidemiology and the lived experiences of people with SUD in the Nordic prison population. Successful research in this field will have the potential to identify significant areas of benefit and will have important implications for ongoing policy related to interventions for SUD in the prison population. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT DERR1-10.2196/35182

Behandling af opioidafhængighed med substitutionsmedicin har vist gode resultater i forhold til at reducere opioidbrug og forebygge stofrelaterede overdoser og dødsfald. Samtidig peger forskning på, at der sker overraskende mange dødsfald under og efter behandlingen.

Purpose To estimate the prevalence of psychiatric morbidity and dual diagnosis in a population of decedents with positive drug toxicology and evaluate changes over time between 2001-2002 and 2011-2012. Materials and methods A total of 520 autopsied drug users with positive toxicology were included in the study from 2001 to 2002 and from 2011 to 2012. Materials included autopsy reports, toxicological screening during autopsy and data from the Danish national health registers, including psychiatric diagnoses from psychiatric hospitals and ambulatory functions, dispensed prescription use from pharmacies and registered treatment for drug use disorders. Results In 2001-2002, 63.3% of the decedents had only positive toxicology, 22.5% also had psychiatric morbidity, and 14.2% had a dual diagnosis. In 2011-2012, 56.4% had only positive toxicology, 26.1% also had psychiatric morbidity, and 17.5% had a dual diagnosis. None of the changes were significant. Decedents with only positive toxicology became older at time of death over time; decedents with psychiatric morbidity and a dual diagnosis did not. The prevalence of nonprescribed psychotropic medication, methadone and benzodiazepines increased. Conclusion Decedents with psychiatric morbidity and dual diagnosis did not increase their lifespan over a 10-year period. Decedents with only positive toxicology increasingly consumed nonprescribed psychotropic medication and may have suffered from undiagnosed psychiatric disorders. The prevalence of prescribed and nonprescribed benzodiazepines and methadone increased and may have contributed to premature mortality.

Det er vigtigt at kende til de største risikofaktorer for både ikke-dødelige og dødelige overdoser, så vi kan blive bedre til at forebygge og afværge dem

Background: WHO guidelines emphasise the need for descriptions of clinical practice and observational studies on risk and benefits of pharmacotherapies in pregnancy. The aims of the present study were to: (1) Describe opioid maintenance treatment (OMT) in the Scandinavian countries in general, and specifically for pregnant women, (2) Describe a project which utilises a new approach using registry-linkage data to examine associations between prenatal exposure to OMT and child outcomes: a Scandinavian cohort study of pregnant women in OMT during pregnancy (ScopeOMT). Data: Guidelines describing the treatment of persons with opioid use disorders in general, and specifically for pregnant women. Scandinavian registry-linkage data from ScopeOMT. Results: Registry data show that approximately 800 pregnant women received OMT during pregnancy in the period of the ScopeOMT study. Similarities across the Scandinavian countries include access to free healthcare and treatment; multidisciplinary teams trained to support pregnant women in OMT; buprenorphine as the recommended drug when initiating therapy; and a holistic focus on the patients’ lives. An important difference is that Norwegian women who use illegal substances that may harm the foetus may be admitted – voluntarily, or against their will – for parts of, or the remainder of the pregnancy to inpatient treatment at specialised clinics. Conclusion: Many similarities in the treatment provided to opioid-dependent persons in the Scandinavian countries place this area in an excellent position to combine the efforts and carry out observational studies concerning the safety of OMT during pregnancy.

Background Drug overdoses remain a significant public health burden throughout the world. This study assessed the incidence and predictors of non-fatal and fatal drug overdoses among patients with an opioid use, treated for drug use disorders (DUD) at public treatment centers in Denmark. Methods A consecutive cohort of patients (n = 11,199) were tracked from date of first registered enrollment between the year 2000 and 2010 to first registered drug overdose, death or December 31st 2010, whichever occurred first. Competing-risks regression models were fitted to estimate the sub hazard ratios (SHRs) of non-fatal and fatal drug overdoses and confounding risk factors. Results A total of 3186 (28%) patients experienced a non-fatal drug overdose during follow-up, and 572 (6%) died from an overdose. Use of benzodiazepines (SHR: 1.15 95% CI 1.03, 1.28) was significantly associated with non-fatal overdose. Intravenous drug use and previous hospitalization for a non-fatal overdose increased the risk of later non-fatal (SHR: 1.57 95% CI 1.42, 1.73) and fatal overdoses (SHR: 1.43 95% CI 1.12, 1.82). Conclusions Patients who use opioids remain at risk of overdoses for a long time after discharge from drug treatment. Besides relevant monitoring and psychosocial support in opioid maintenance treatment, there is a need for informing and educating opioid users in risk factors and preventive measures in settings where they are often difficult to access for traditional treatment services.

Background: Studies on drug use are limited by the study populations available, which usually only include drug users in treatment settings. Therefore, the knowledge base is limited on drug users not entering treatment for drug use disorder (DUD). Using registers from departments of forensic medicine enables research on decedents with DUD, irrespective of treatment status. Objectives: The aim of this study is to characterize and compare drug users not receiving treatment and drug users receiving treatment, in relation to cause of death, toxicological findings, and use of nonprescribed medication. Methods: Retrospective register-based study on deceased drug users with supplemental data from the Registry of Drug Abusers Undergoing Treatment and the Register of Medicinal Product Statistics in 2 observation periods: 2001–2002 and 2011–2012. Results: Two-thirds of the population were not receiving treatment at the time of death in both observation periods. Drug users receiving treatment were more likely to die from accidental poisonings than drug users not receiving treatment. There was no difference in mean age at the time of death between the 2 groups, and both groups were older in the second observation period. There was no difference in toxicological findings according to treatment status and the 2 groups did not differ in the presence of nonprescribed medication found in the blood at the time of death. Discussion/Conclusions: The proportion of drug users that received treatment prior to death has not increased, and deceased drug users are mostly not in treatment for their drug use at the time of death.

BACKGROUND: Opioid agonist treatment (OAT) for opioid use disorders may be delivered at treatment clinics or dispensed from pharmacies, however the type of delivery may be associated with different risks and benefits. The aim of the study was to investigate whether dispensing of methadone or buprenorphine at pharmacies during treatment for opioid use disorders was associated with adverse outcomes.METHODS: Retrospective cohort study using a national, linked, population-level data set from Denmark. Patients included were between 18 and 75 years, living in Denmark, and admitted for treatment for opioid use disorders during 2000-2016 (n = 9299). Cox proportional hazards regression was estimated for convictions, non-fatal overdoses, and death, after the first dispensing of either methadone or buprenorphine from a pharmacy after starting treatment.FINDINGS: Of all patients, 68 % had methadone and 31 % had buprenorphine dispensed at a pharmacy. Compared with the time prior to pharmacy dispension, the risk of criminal convictions increased after having methadone dispensed from a pharmacy (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 1.22, 95 % confidence interval (CI) = 1.16-1.28), non-fatal overdoses (aHR = 1.55, CI 1.41-1.71), and all-cause mortality (aHR = 1.54, CI = 1.43-1.76). After having buprenorphine dispensed at a pharmacy, risk of criminal convictions increased (aHR = 1.08, CI = 1.01-1.16) and non-fatal overdoses (aHR = 1.31, CI = 1.18-1.45), but not all-cause mortality (aHR = 1.07, CI = 0.94-1.23).CONCLUSIONS: For almost all outcomes investigated across medication type, the risk of adverse events increased following a switch from clinic dispension to pharmacy dispension of medications in OAT. Medically responsible and safe provision of OAT may often require more clinical follow-up than what is typically provided when medication is dispensed at pharmacies.

Aims. This study examined overdose deaths involving benzodiazepines and prescription opioids, and studied associated factors. Methods. In a retrospective registry study of drug-overdose deaths (n = 167) with post-mortem toxicological findings of benzodiazepines and/or opioids/carisoprodol (strong analgesics) in Oslo, Norway, from 2006 to 2008, prescribing and dispensing patterns were investigated, and factors associated with benzodiazepines and/or strong analgesics in post-mortem toxicology where these medications were not prescribed were identified. Results. Among deceased with toxicological findings of only benzodiazepines, 28.1% (20.7–36.9) had been dispensed benzodiazepines four weeks prior to death; only strong analgesics, 33.3% (13.0–61.3) had been dispensed strong analgesics; both benzodiazepines and strong analgesics, 58.3% (36.9–77.2) had been dispensed benzodiazepines and/or strong analgesics. Also, 33.0% of the deceased had five or more different prescribing physicians of either benzodi...

Background Benzodiazepines are frequently prescribed to patients with drug use disorders. However, it has previously been difficult to distinguish whether this frequent prescribing was due to underlying psychiatric disorders or inappropriate prescribing. In a nationwide cohort study, we investigated the prescribing of benzodiazepines to patients with drug use disorders in connection with treatment admission. Methods Benzodiazepine prescriptions to patients (N = 33203) aged 18 to 67 years admitting for outpatient treatment for drug use disorders in Denmark, 2000 to 2010, were studied by using linked data from nationwide health registries. Factors associated with increasing amounts of benzodiazepine use within the first year after admission were assessed by multinomial logistic regression. Proportions of very long-term benzodiazepine prescription were calculated. Results During the first year after admission to treatment, 26.2 % of patients were prescribed benzodiazepines. Of these, 35.5 % were prescribed benzodiazepines at dose levels that might indicate inappropriate use (>365 Defined Daily Dose per year), and 34.6 % were prescribed more than one type of benzodiazepines. Diazepam was the most commonly prescribed type. Among patients with opioid use, 43.2 % were prescribed benzodiazepines which were three times higher than for patients with cannabis (12.2 %) or central stimulating drugs (13.8 %) as their primary drug use. Admitting to treatment for a drug use disorder did not increase the specialized psychiatric treatment coverage of this patient group, disregarding use of prescribed benzodiazepines. 29.5 % were new users of prescribed benzodiazepines, and of these, 27.5 % continued into very long-term use (≥4 years after admission) during the study period. Conclusions Benzodiazepines were commonly prescribed to patients admitting to treatment for drug use disorders, and included prescription of multiple and non-optimal types, high doses, and very long-term prescriptions. These findings point towards inappropriate prescribing of benzodiazepines in many cases more than treatment for psychiatric disorders.

Background/Aims: Increasing rates of overdose deaths involving opioid maintenance treatment (OMT) medications and particularly methadone have been observed concurrently with the implementation of liberal OMT strategies (i.e. minimum of control and high doses prescribed). This study examined methadone-related overdose deaths in a liberal OMT programme. Methods: Drug-overdose deaths (n = 130) with detection of methadone in Copenhagen, Aarhus, and Odense Municipality, Denmark, during the period 2008-2011 were identified from a registry. Cases with and without prescribed methadone as OMT were compared. Treatment delivery strategy among OMT-prescribed methadone cases was investigated. Results: Methadone was detected in 130 overdose deaths (71.4% of all overdose deaths). Among these, 63.1% were receiving methadone maintenance treatment. Of these, 79.3% had co-detection of benzodiazepines. Concomitant detection of heroin, non-prescribed benzodiazepines, and younger age were associated with having non-prescribed methadone in the toxicological findings (adjusted OR 3.1, 4.0 and 9.5, respectively). Of the decedents, 43.8% were prescribed a higher methadone dose than recommended (>120 mg daily), of which 80.0% did not have supervised intake of methadone. Conclusions: Liberal OMT access does not necessarily prevent overdose deaths overall. Prescription of higher doses of methadone combined with benzodiazepines may result in an increased risk of overdose for individuals in as well as outside OMT.