Search

Background Increasing demand for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) places greater emphasis on the efficiency of pathways and services. A significant limitation to increasing TAVI capacity is the availability of cardiac catheterisation laboratory time. We have developed a novel complexity scoring system (TAVI ComplEXity; TEX score) which can aid in planning lists with appropriate case selection. To validate the TEX score, we have undertaken a retrospective analysis of TAVI cases. The hypothesis is that increasing TEX score correlates with increased procedural duration and reduced valve academic research consortium (VARC) 3 technical and device success.Methods The TEX score assigns patients to a complexity level of 1 (low), 2 (intermediate) or 3 (high) based on the presence of specific clinical and anatomical variables. For validation purposes, comparisons were made between patients in the three complexity levels with respect to procedural duration as well as VARC-3 technical success, device success and early safety.Results The validation study included 1034 consecutive patients who underwent TAVI between June 2021 and October 2023. Of these, 582 (56.3%) were classified as level 1 complexity, 377 (36.5%) level 2 and 75 (7.3%) level 3. Significant differences were observed between the three groups with respect to procedural duration (73.7 min vs 85.6 min vs 136 min; p

This study sought to compare the morbidity and mortality of redo aortic valve replacement (redo-AVR) versus valve-in-valve trans-catheter aortic valve implantation (valve-in-valve TAVI) for patients with a failing bioprosthetic valve. A multicentre UK retrospective study of redo-AVR or valve-in-valve TAVI for patients referred for redo aortic valve intervention due to a degenerated aortic bioprosthesis. Propensity score matching was performed for confounding factors. From July 2005 to April 2021, 911 patients underwent redo-AVR and 411 patients valve-in-valve TAVI. There were 125 pairs for analysis after propensity score matching. Mean age was 75.2±8.5 years. In-hospital mortality was 7.2% (n=9) for redo-AVR vs 0 for valve-in-valve TAVI, p=0.002. Surgical patients suffered more post-operative complications, including IABP support (p=0.02), early re-operation (p

Background: Microvascular obstruction commonly affects patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and is independently associated with adverse outcomes. Objective: To determine whether or not a strategy involving low-dose intracoronary fibrinolytic therapy infused early after coronary reperfusion will reduce microvascular obstruction. Design: This was a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging trial. Setting: The trial took place at 11 hospitals in the UK between 17 March 2016 and 21 December 2017. Participants: Patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and a symptom onset to reperfusion time of ≤ 6 hours were eligible for randomisation. Radial artery access was a requirement, and further angiographic criteria included a proximal-to-middle coronary artery occlusion or impaired coronary flow in the presence of a definite thrombus in the culprit coronary artery. Exclusion criteria included a functional coronary collateral supply to the infarct-related artery, any contraindication to fibrinolysis and lack of informed consent. Additional exclusion criteria for safety were (1) requirement for immunosuppressive drug therapy for ≤ 3 months and (2) treatment with an antimicrobial agent. Intervention: A total of 440 participants were randomly assigned 1 : 1 : 1 to treatment with placebo (n = 151), 10 mg of alteplase (n = 144) or 20 mg of alteplase (n = 145) administered by manual infusion directly into the infarct-related coronary artery over 5–10 minutes. The intervention was scheduled to happen after reperfusion and before stent implantation. Outcomes: The primary outcome was the amount of microvascular obstruction (percentage of left ventricular mass) demonstrated by contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging at 2–7 days after enrolment. The primary analysis was the comparison between the 20 mg of alteplase group and the placebo group; if this comparison was not significant, the comparison of the 10 mg of alteplase group with the placebo group was considered as a secondary analysis. Sample size: A total of 618 patients (minimum of 558 patients). Recruitment was halted on 21 December 2017 given that conditional power for the primary outcome based on a prespecified analysis of the first 267 randomised participants was

Background There is a paucity of real-world outcome data comparing clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We sought to assess the association of choice of oral P2Y12-receptor inhibitor with clinical outcomes following PPCI for STEMI in a large consecutive patient series.Methods Demographic, procedural and 12-month outcome data were prospectively collected for all patients undergoing PPCI in Leeds, UK, between 01 January 2009 and 31 December 2011, and 01 January 2013 and 31 December 2013. Clinical endpoints were 30-day and 12-month all-cause mortality, recurrent MI and 30-day HORIZONS-major bleeding. Logistic regression analyses were undertaken to adjust for confounding factors.Results Prasugrel (n=1244) was associated with lower adjusted 30-day (OR 0.53 (0.34–0.85)) and 12-month (OR 0.55 (0.38–0.78)) mortality, and 12-month MI (OR 0.63 (0.42–0.94)) compared with clopidogrel (n=1648). Importantly, prasugrel was associated with lower adjusted 30-day mortality (OR 0.51 (0.29–0.91)) compared with ticagrelor (n=811). Lower 30-day (OR 0.40 (0.17–0.94)) and 12-month (OR 0.54 (0.32–0.93)) MI were observed in ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel, an association absent in comparison with prasugrel. Adjusted bleeding were not statistically significantly different among the P2Y12-receptor inhibitors.Conclusion In this large consecutive real-world series, prasugrel was associated with lower adjusted 30-day mortality compared with ticagrelor and clopidogrel, and lower adjusted 12-month mortality compared with clopidogrel. Both prasugrel and ticagrelor were associated with lower recurrent MI following PPCI compared with clopidogrel, with no overall increase in adjusted bleeding.