Search

Objectives To assess the reliability of applying a radiographic scoring system in estimating the severity of stool retention (SR) in hospitalized older adults with constipation, and to identify risk factors associated with clinical constipation and SR scores. Design Retrospective, case series study. Setting Southeast Ohio community hospital. Participants Adults 65 years or older with constipation or fecal impaction and abdominal radiographs available (N = 122). Bowel obstruction was excluded. Measurement Radiographs were independently scored by four readers twice, “5” being the most severe, for each quadrant of an abdominal film; possible total score was 0 to 20. Clinical constipation was defined as an average SR score of 13 or higher. Intra-class correlation was used to measure inter-rater agreement. Results The overall inter-rater agreement on abdominal radiograph readings was 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.88–0.93. Clinical constipation was associated with the use of statins and antimuscarinics by univariate logistic regression analysis. After adjusting for age, sex, residency, smoking history, oral laxatives, and self-reported constipation, the use of statins remained significantly associated with clinical constipation (OR = 3.86, 95% CI = 1.08–13.77, P = .036). Univariate linear regression analysis revealed that higher SR scores were associated with community residency, self-reported constipation, and the use of statins and antimuscarinics. After adjusting for the above confounders by multiple linear regression analyses, the use of antimuscarinics was independently associated with higher SR score (β = 1.769, 95% CI = 0.008–3.531, P = .049). Conclusion Abdominal radiography was reliable in assessing the severity of SR in older adults with constipation. The use of statins and antimuscarinics was associated with clinical constipation and greater SR.

Context: Information is limited in the stool retention (SR) and distribution patterns of constipated older adults. Objective: By using a radiographic scoring system for assessing the severity of SR in hospitalized constipated elderly, we investigate SR distribution patterns between two groups (highvs. low-scored) and to identify factors associated with high and low SR scores. Method: Adults aged ≥65 years admitted to a community hospital between 2005 and 2008 who were discharged with primary or secondary diagnosis of constipation without bowel obstruction and also had abdominal radiographs during the stay (N=131). Poor quality films (N=9) were excluded. Abdominal radiographs were scored by four readers. A score 0-5 (5 being the most severe) for each quadrant of radiographs (total score: 0-20) was used to estimate the severity of SR. Each quadrant represents the approximate location of ascending (Q1), transverse (Q2), descending (Q3), and recto-sigmoid colon area (Q4). Those with scores ≥ 13 were in the high-scored group (N=71); ≤12 in the low-scored group (N=39). Results: The range of average total SR scores was 7 to 18.9; mean score ±SD, 13.4±2.5. The high-scored group was younger than the low-scored group (mean±SD: 81.4±8.2 vs. 86.8±7.3 years, p