Search

Serum tryptase is a biomarker used to aid in the identification of certain myeloid neoplasms, most notably systemic mastocytosis, where basal serum tryptase (BST) levels >20 ng/mL are a minor criterion for diagnosis. Although clonal myeloid neoplasms are rare, the common cause for elevated BST levels is the genetic trait hereditary α-tryptasemia (HαT) caused by increased germline TPSAB1 copy number. To date, the precise structural variation and mechanism(s) underlying elevated BST in HαT and the general clinical utility of tryptase genotyping, remain undefined. Through cloning, long-read sequencing, and assembling of the human tryptase locus from an individual with HαT, and validating our findings in vitro and in silico, we demonstrate that BST elevations arise from overexpression of replicated TPSAB1 loci encoding canonical α-tryptase protein owing to coinheritance of a linked overactive promoter element. Modeling BST levels based on TPSAB1 replication number, we generate new individualized clinical reference values for the upper limit of normal. Using this personalized laboratory medicine approach, we demonstrate the clinical utility of tryptase genotyping, finding that in the absence of HαT, BST levels >11.4 ng/mL frequently identify indolent clonal mast cell disease. Moreover, substantial BST elevations (eg, >100 ng/mL), which would ordinarily prompt bone marrow biopsy, can result from TPSAB1 replications alone and thus be within normal limits for certain individuals with HαT.

Measurable residual disease (MRD) is associated with relapse and survival in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We aimed to quantify the impact of MRD on outcomes across clinical contexts, including its association with hematologic response and MRD assay sensitivity. We performed systematic literature review and meta-analysis of 48 studies that reported the association between MRD and overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS) in AML and provided information on the MRD threshold used and the hematologic response of the study population. Among studies limited to patients in complete remission (CR), the estimated 5-year OS for the MRD-negative and MRD-positive groups was 67% (95% Bayesian credible interval [CrI], 53-77%) and 31% (95% CrI, 18-44%), respectively. Achievement of an MRD-negative response was associated with superior DFS and OS, regardless of MRD threshold or analytic sensitivity. Among patients in CR, the benefit of MRD negativity was highest in studies using an MRD cutoff less than 0.1%. The beneficial impact of MRD negativity was observed across MRD assays and timing of MRD assessment. In patients with AML in morphological remission, achievement of MRD negativity is associated with superior DFS and OS, irrespective of hematologic response or the MRD threshold used.

Supplementary Data

Genetic mutations associated with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) also occur in age-related clonal hematopoiesis, often in the same individual. This makes confident assignment of detected variants to malignancy challenging. The issue is particularly crucial for AML posttreatment measurable residual disease monitoring, where results can be discordant between genetic sequencing and flow cytometry. We show here that it is possible to distinguish AML from clonal hematopoiesis and to resolve the immunophenotypic identity of clonal architecture. To achieve this, we first design patient-specific DNA probes based on patient's whole-genome sequencing and then use them for patient-personalized single-cell DNA sequencing with simultaneous single-cell antibody–oligonucleotide sequencing. Examples illustrate AML arising from DNMT3A- and TET2-mutated clones as well as independently. The ability to personalize single-cell proteogenomic assessment for individual patients based on leukemia-specific genomic features has implications for ongoing AML precision medicine efforts.Significance:This study offers a proof of principle of patient-personalized customized single-cell proteogenomics in AML including whole-genome sequencing–defined structural variants, currently unmeasurable by commercial “off-the-shelf” panels. This approach allows for the definition of genetic and immunophenotype features for an individual patient that would be best suited for measurable residual disease tracking.

Supplementary legend

Supplemental Figure 2. Effect of combination of NY-ESO-1 vaccine and decitabine treatment on NY-ESO-1 expression.

Purpose: Treatment options are limited for patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). The azanucleosides, azacitidine and decitabine, are first-line therapy for MDS that induce promoter demethylation and gene expression of the highly immunogenic tumor antigen NY-ESO-1. We demonstrated that patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) receiving decitabine exhibit induction of NY-ESO-1 expression in circulating blasts. We hypothesized that vaccinating against NY-ESO-1 in patients with MDS receiving decitabine would capitalize upon induced NY-ESO-1 expression in malignant myeloid cells to provoke an NY-ESO-1–specific MDS-directed cytotoxic T-cell immune response.Experimental Design: In a phase I study, 9 patients with MDS received an HLA-unrestricted NY-ESO-1 vaccine (CDX-1401 + poly-ICLC) in a nonoverlapping schedule every four weeks with standard-dose decitabine.Results: Analysis of samples serially obtained from the 7 patients who reached the end of the study demonstrated induction of NY-ESO-1 expression in 7 of 7 patients and NY-ESO-1–specific CD4+ and CD8+ T-lymphocyte responses in 6 of 7 and 4 of 7 of the vaccinated patients, respectively. Myeloid cells expressing NY-ESO-1, isolated from a patient at different time points during decitabine therapy, were capable of activating a cytotoxic response from autologous NY-ESO-1–specific T lymphocytes. Vaccine responses were associated with a detectable population of CD141Hi conventional dendritic cells, which are critical for the uptake of NY-ESO-1 vaccine and have a recognized role in antitumor immune responses.Conclusions: These data indicate that vaccination against induced NY-ESO-1 expression can produce an antigen-specific immune response in a relatively nonimmunogenic myeloid cancer and highlight the potential for induced antigen-directed immunotherapy in a group of patients with limited options. Clin Cancer Res; 24(5); 1019–29. ©2017 AACR.See related commentary by Fuchs, p. 991

Supplemental Table 1. Clinical characteristics of enrolled patients. Supplemental Table 2. Antibodies used in flow cytometry experiments Supplemental Table 3. Primers and Taqman probes used in quantitative pyrosequencing and RT-PCR experiments. Supplemental Table 4. Patient safety data. Supplemental Table 5. Molecular profile and therapeutic response. Supplemental Table 6. Antibody titers for common vaccine targets.

The European LeukemiaNet (ELN) recently revised both the clinical (2022) and measurable residual disease (MRD) testing (2021) guidelines for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Updated World Health Organization (WHO) and an International Consensus Classification (ICC) for myeloid neoplasms were also published in 2022. Together, these documents update the classification, risk stratification, prognostication, monitoring recommendations, and response assessment for patients with AML. Increased appreciation of the genetic drivers of AML over the past decade and our increasingly sophisticated understanding of AML biology have been translated into novel therapies and more complex clinical treatment guidelines. Somatic genetic abnormalities and germline predispositions now define and guide treatment and counseling for subtypes of this hematologic malignancy. In this paper, we discuss how we approach AML in daily clinical practice taking into consideration these recent updates in the context of new treatments and discoveries over the past decade.

Little is known about whether risk classification at diagnosis predicts post-hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) outcomes in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We evaluated 8709 patients with AML from the CIBMTR database, and after selection and manual curation of the cytogenetics data, 3779 patients in first complete remission were included in the final analysis: 2384 with intermediate-risk, 969 with adverse-risk, and 426 with KMT2A-rearranged disease. An adjusted multivariable analysis detected an increased risk of relapse for patients with KMT2A-rearranged or adverse-risk AML as compared to those with intermediate-risk disease (hazards ratio [HR], 1.27; P = .01; HR, 1.71; P < .001, respectively). Leukemia-free survival was similar for patients with KMT2A rearrangement or adverse risk (HR, 1.26; P = .002, and HR, 1.47; P < .001), as was overall survival (HR, 1.32; P < .001, and HR, 1.45; P < .001). No differences in outcome were detected when patients were stratified by KMT2A fusion partner. This study is the largest conducted to date on post-HCT outcomes in AML, with manually curated cytogenetics used for risk stratification. Our work demonstrates that risk classification at diagnosis remains predictive of post-HCT outcomes in AML. It also highlights the critical need to develop novel treatment strategies for patients with KMT2A-rearranged and adverse-risk disease.

Response criteria for patients treated for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) based on cytomorphology are inadequate. Many patients achieving a complete remission by such criteria will later relapse. Patients with AML in such remissions who test negative using higher sensitivity measures of residual disease burden (measurable residual disease [MRD]) have on average lower relapse rates and better survival than those testing positive. This association has raised the possibility that these technological advances in measurement of tumor burden could be used to optimize the drug development and regulatory approval processes in AML. The heterogeneous genetic etiology, diverse immunophenotypic profiles, related precursor states and polyclonal architecture however combine to make the development of standardized and validated MRD assessments for AML challenging. Current and future methods to measure residual disease in AML, performance characteristics of testing currently in use, and potential uses for optimized AML MRD tests including as a surrogate endpoint are discussed.

Multiple studies have demonstrated that patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who have measurable residual disease (MRD) detected during or after treatment have higher relapse rates and worse survival than similar patients testing negative. Updated response criteria for AML reflect the understanding that achievement of complete remission (CR) with no detectable MRD using high-sensitivity tests represents a superior response over conventional cytomorphological CR alone. Potential use cases for AML MRD testing are diverse and include patient selection for clinical trials and therapeutic assignment, early relapse detection and intervention during sequential monitoring, and drug development, including deep quantification for antileukemia efficacy and as a surrogate endpoint for overall survival in regulatory approvals. Testing for AML MRD has not, however, been harmonized, and many technical and clinical questions remain. The implications of MRD test results for specific therapeutic combinations, molecular subsets, test types, treatment time points, sample types, and patient characteristics remain incompletely defined. No perfect AML MRD test or testing strategy currently exists, and the evidence basis for clinical recommendations in this rare disease is sparse but growing. It is unproven whether conversion of an MRD test result from positive to negative by additional therapeutic intervention improves relapse risk and survival. Several national- and international-level consortia have recently been initiated to advance the generation and collection of evidence to support the use of AML MRD testing in clinical practice, drug development, and regulatory approvals.

Although cell-free DNA (cfDNA) tests have emerged as a potential non-invasive alternative to bone marrow biopsies for monitoring clonal hematopoiesis in hematologic diseases, whether commercial cfDNA assays can be implemented for the detection and quantification of de novo clonal hematopoiesis in place of blood cells is uncertain. In this study, peripheral plasma cfDNA samples available from patients with aplastic anemia (n=25) or myelodysplastic syndromes (n=27) and a healthy cohort (n=107) were screened for somatic variants in genes related to hematologic malignancies using a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments-certified panel. Results were further compared to DNA sequencing of matched blood cells. In reported results, 85% of healthy subjects, 36% of patients with aplastic anemia and 74% of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes were found to have somatic cfDNA variants, most frequently in DNMT3A, TET2, ASXL1 and SF3B1. However, concordance between cfDNA and blood cell findings was poor for the detection of clonal hematopoiesis when the allele frequency of the variants was

BackgroundPrevention of relapse for adults with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) in first remission (CR1) is the most common indication for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). Measurable residual disease (MRD) detection has been associated with higher relapse rates, but testing is not standardized. Establishment of validated AML MRD criteria would allow harmonization across centers facilitating clinical trials and generalizable practice guidelines.MethodsPatients aged 18 or older who underwent first alloHCT forFLT3, NPM1, IDH1, IDH2and/orKITmutated AML in CR1 were eligible for this multicenter study. Residual mutations detected in remission using ultra-deep error-corrected next-generation DNA-sequencing (NGS-MRD) associated with increased relapse risk were validated in a second independent cohort. The impact of baseline characteristics on NGS-MRD results was evaluated.ResultsPre-conditioning CR1 blood samples from 1075 patients were tested. Detection of residualNPM1and/orFLT3-ITD mutations before alloHCT was associated with worse outcomes after transplantation in both discovery (patients transplanted 2013-2017) and validation (patients transplanted 2018-2019) cohorts. In multivariate Cox regression analysis detection of residualNPM1m (relapse; HR: 4.9, 3.5-7.0, PFLT3-ITD (relapse: HR: 4.2, 3.1-5.7, PConclusionsDetection of residualNPM1and/orFLT3-ITD mutations in the blood of patients undergoing alloHCT for AML in CR1 is associated with increased relapse and worse survival. In those undergoing reduced intensity conditioning, melphalan may reduce the risk associated with testing NGS-MRD positive prior to transplantation.

Patients ≥55 years-old with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) fare poorly with conventional chemotherapy with 5-year overall survival of ∼20%. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors and novel B-cell targeted therapies improve outcomes, but rates of relapse and death in remission remain high. Allogeneic blood or marrow transplantation (AlloBMT) provides an alternative consolidation strategy, and post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) facilitates HLA-mismatched transplants with low rates of non-relapse mortality (NRM) and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD).The transplant database at Johns Hopkins was queried for patients ≥ 55 years old who received alloBMT for ALL using PTCy.The database included 77 such patients. Most received reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) (88.3%), were in first remission (CR1) (85.7%), and had B-lineage disease (90.9%). For the entire cohort, 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were 46% (95% CI 34-57) and 49% (95% CI 37-60). Grade 3-4 acute GVHD occurred in only 3% of patients and chronic GVHD in 13%. In multivariable analysis, myeloablative conditioning led to worse RFS (HR 4.65, p=0.001); while transplant in CR1 (HR 0.30, p=0.004), and transplant for Ph+ ALL vs. T ALL (HR 0.29, p=0.03) improved RFS. Of the 54 patients who received RIC alloBMT in CR1 for B ALL, 5-year RFS and OS were 62% (95% CI 47-74) and 65% (95% CI 51-77), respectively, with a 5-year relapse incidence of 16% (95% CI 7-27) and NRM of 24% (95% CI 13-36).RIC AlloBMT with PTCy in CR1 represents a promising consolidation strategy for B ALL patients ≥ 55 years old.NIH grants P01 CA225618 and P30 CA06973.

Serum tryptase is a biomarker used to aid in the identification of certain myeloid neoplasms, most notably systemic mastocytosis, where baseline (BST) levels >20 ng/mL are a minor criterion for diagnosis. Whereas clonal myeloid neoplasms are rare, the common cause for elevated BST is the genetic trait hereditary alpha-tryptasemia (HαT) caused by increased germline TPSAB1 copy number. To date, the precise structural variation and mechanism(s) underlying elevated BST in HαT and the general clinical utility of tryptase genotyping, remain undefined. Through cloning, long-read sequencing, and assembling of the human tryptase locus from an individual with HαT, and validating our findings in vitro and in silico, we demonstrate that BST elevations arise from over-expression of replicated TPSAB1 loci encoding wild-type α-tryptase due to co-inheritance of a linked over-active promoter element. Modeling BST levels based upon TPSAB1 replication number we generate new individualized clinical reference values for the upper limit of ‘normal’. Using this personalized laboratory medicine approach, we demonstrate the clinical utility of tryptase genotyping, finding that in the absence of HαT, BST levels >11.4 ng/mL frequently identify indolent clonal mast cell disease. Moreover, substantial BST elevations (e.g., >100 ng/mL) which would ordinarily prompt bone marrow biopsy, can result from TPSAB1 replications alone and thus be within ‘normal’ limits for certain individuals with HαT.

Lawal et al report on a 45-fold increase in secondary hematologic malignancy in 120 patients following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for sickle cell disease (SCD), comparable to what has been reported following gene therapy. Notably, the cohort is enriched for older patients and for haploidentical transplant recipients with mixed chimerism following HSCT. These data further support the idea that pre-existing premalignant myeloid clones undergo clonal selection in the setting of nonmyeloablative HSCT and contribute to secondary malignancy.

Genetic predisposition (familial risk) in the myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) is more common than the risk observed in most other cancers, including breast, prostate, and colon. Up to 10% of MPNs are considered to be familial. Recent genome-wide association studies have identified genomic loci associated with an MPN diagnosis. However, the identification of variants with functional contributions to the development of MPN remains limited. In this study, we have included 630 MPN patients and whole genome sequencing was performed in 64 individuals with familial MPN to uncover recurrent germline predisposition variants. Both targeted and unbiased filtering of single nucleotide variants (SNVs) was performed, with a comparison to 218 individuals with MPN unselected for familial status. This approach identified an ATM L2307F SNV occurring in nearly 8% of individuals with familial MPN. Structural protein modeling of this variant suggested stabilization of inactive ATM dimer, and alteration of the endogenous ATM locus in a human myeloid cell line resulted in decreased phosphorylation of the downstream tumor suppressor CHEK2. These results implicate ATM, and the DNA-damage response pathway, in predisposition to MPN.

Genetic mutations associated with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) also occur in age-related clonal hematopoiesis, often in the same individual. This makes confident assignment of detected variants to malignancy challenging. The issue is particularly crucial for AML posttreatment measurable residual disease monitoring, where results can be discordant between genetic sequencing and flow cytometry. We show here that it is possible to distinguish AML from clonal hematopoiesis and to resolve the immunophenotypic identity of clonal architecture. To achieve this, we first design patient-specific DNA probes based on patient's whole-genome sequencing and then use them for patient-personalized single-cell DNA sequencing with simultaneous single-cell antibody–oligonucleotide sequencing. Examples illustrate AML arising from DNMT3A- and TET2-mutated clones as well as independently. The ability to personalize single-cell proteogenomic assessment for individual patients based on leukemia-specific genomic features has implications for ongoing AML precision medicine efforts. Significance: This study offers a proof of principle of patient-personalized customized single-cell proteogenomics in AML including whole-genome sequencing–defined structural variants, currently unmeasurable by commercial “off-the-shelf” panels. This approach allows for the definition of genetic and immunophenotype features for an individual patient that would be best suited for measurable residual disease tracking.

The human leukocyte antigen (HLA) locus plays a central role in adaptive immune function and has significant clinical implications for tissue transplant compatibility and allelic disease associations. Studies using bulk-cell RNA sequencing have demonstrated that HLA transcription may be regulated in an allele-specific manner and single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) has the potential to better characterize these expression patterns. However, quantification of allele-specific expression (ASE) for HLA loci requires sample-specific reference genotyping due to extensive polymorphism. While genotype prediction from bulk RNA sequencing is well described, the feasibility of predicting HLA genotypes directly from single-cell data is unknown. Here we evaluate and expand upon several computational HLA genotyping tools by comparing predictions from human single-cell data to gold-standard, molecular genotyping. The highest 2-field accuracy averaged across all loci was 76% by arcasHLA and increased to 86% using a composite model of multiple genotyping tools. We also developed a highly accurate model (AUC 0.93) for predicting HLA-DRB345 copy number in order to improve genotyping accuracy of the HLA-DRB locus. Genotyping accuracy improved with read depth and was reproducible at repeat sampling. Using a metanalytic approach, we also show that HLA genotypes from PHLAT and OptiType can generate ASE ratios that are highly correlated (R2 = 0.8 and 0.94, respectively) with those derived from gold-standard genotyping.Highlights-Benchmarking of HLA genotype prediction accuracy from 5’- and 3’-based single-cell RNA-seq data compared to molecular HLA genotyping-Quantification of transcript coverage by 5’- and 3’-based single cell sequencing methods-Accurate prediction of complex HLA-DRB345 copy numbers using supervised learning-Balancing accuracy and performance through composite HLA genotyping-Meta-analytic approach to summarizing allele-specific expression of HLA genotypes at single-cell level

Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) has a median age at diagnosis of 67 years. The most common curative therapy remains an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT), yet it is complicated by treatment-related mortality (TRM) and ongoing morbidity including graft versus host disease (GVHD) that may impact survival, particularly in older patients. We examined the outcomes and predictors of success in 1321 patients aged 60 years and older receiving a HCT for AML in first complete remission (CR1) from 2007-2017 and reported to the CIBMTR. Outcomes were compared in three age cohorts (60-64; 65-69; 70+). With median follow-up of nearly 3 years, patients aged 60-64 had modestly, though significantly better OS, DFS and lower TRM than those either 65-69 or 70+; cohorts with similar outcomes. Three-year OS for the 3 cohorts was 49.4%, 42.3%, and 44.7% respectively (p = 0.026). TRM was higher with increasing age, cord blood as graft source and HCT-CI score of ≥3. Conditioning intensity was not a significant predictor of OS in the 60-69 cohort with 3-year OS of 46% for RIC and 49% for MAC (p = 0.38); MAC was rarely used over age 70. There was no difference in the relapse rate, incidence of Grade III/IV acute GVHD, or moderate-severe chronic GVHD across the age cohorts. After adjusting for other predictors, age had a small effect on OS and TRM. High-risk features including poor cytogenetics and measurable residual disease (MRD) prior to HCT were each significantly associated with relapse and accounted for most of the adverse impact on OS and DFS. Age did not influence the incidence of either acute or chronic GVHD; while graft type and associated GVHD prophylaxis were most important. These data suggest that age alone is not a barrier to successful HCT for AML in CR1 and should not exclude patients from HCT. Efforts should focus on minimizing residual disease and better donor selection.

Several methodologies that rely on the detection of immunophenotypic or molecular abnormalities of the neoplastic cells are now available to quantify measurable (“minimal”) residual disease (MRD) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Although the perfect MRD test does not (yet) exist, the strong association between MRD and adverse patient outcomes has provided the impetus to use measures of MRD as biomarker in the routine care of AML patients and during clinical trials. MRD test results may inform the selection of postremission therapy in some patients but evidence supporting the use of MRD as predictive biomarker is still limited. Several retrospective studies have shown that conversion from undetectable to detectable MRD or increasing MRD over time is associated with overt disease recurrence, and MRD testing may therefore be valuable as a monitoring biomarker for early detection of relapse. Interpreting serial MRD data is complex, with open questions regarding the optimal timing and frequency of testing, as well as the identification of test-specific thresholds to define relapse. Importantly, it is unknown whether intervening at the time of MRD detection, rather than at overt disease recurrence, improves outcomes. Finally, using MRD as a surrogate efficacy-response biomarker to accelerate drug development/approval has already been accepted by regulatory authorities in other diseases and is of great interest as a potential strategy in AML. While the prognostic value of MRD in AML is well established, data from prospective clinical trials confirming that treatment effects on MRD directly relate to clinical outcomes are needed to further establish the role of MRD as a surrogate endpoint in AML.

ImportancePreventing relapse for adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first remission is the most common indication for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant. The presence of AML measurable residual disease (MRD) has been associated with higher relapse rates, but testing is not standardized.ObjectiveTo determine whether DNA sequencing to identify residual variants in the blood of adults with AML in first remission before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant identifies patients at increased risk of relapse and poorer overall survival compared with those without these DNA variants.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsIn this retrospective observational study, DNA sequencing was performed on pretransplant blood from patients aged 18 years or older who had undergone their first allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant during first remission for AML associated with variants in FLT3, NPM1, IDH1, IDH2, or KIT at 1 of 111 treatment sites from 2013 through 2019. Clinical data were collected, through May 2022, by the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research.ExposureCentralized DNA sequencing of banked pretransplant remission blood samples.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcomes were overall survival and relapse. Day of transplant was considered day 0. Hazard ratios were reported using Cox proportional hazards regression models.ResultsOf 1075 patients tested, 822 had FLT3 internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) and/or NPM1 mutated AML (median age, 57.1 years, 54% female). Among 371 patients in the discovery cohort, the persistence of NPM1 and/or FLT3-ITD variants in the blood of 64 patients (17.3%) in remission before undergoing transplant was associated with worse outcomes after transplant (2013-2017). Similarly, of the 451 patients in the validation cohort who had undergone transplant in 2018-2019, 78 patients (17.3%) with residual NPM1 and/or FLT3-ITD variants had higher rates of relapse at 3 years (68% vs 21%; difference, 47% [95% CI, 26% to 69%]; HR, 4.32 [95% CI, 2.98 to 6.26]; P P Conclusions and RelevanceAmong patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first remission prior to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant, the persistence of FLT3 internal tandem duplication or NPM1 variants in the blood at an allele fraction of 0.01% or higher was associated with increased relapse and worse survival compared with those without these variants. Further study is needed to determine whether routine DNA-sequencing testing for residual variants can improve outcomes for patients with acute myeloid leukemia.