Search

Objectives: The first COVID-19 lockdown raised concerns about reduced access to primary care, especially for people with chronic diseases particularly at risk in the absence of follow-up. However, the COVIQuest trial, evaluating the impact of a general practitioner (GP) phone call (intervention) to chronic patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) or mental health disorder (MHD) concluded that the intervention had no effect at 1 month on the rate of self-reported hospitalisations in the CVD subtrial, whereas the intervention group in MHD subtrial might have a higher rate. This second part of the study aimed to describe the 6 month hospitalisation and specialised consultation rates, using the French health data system ( Système National des Données de Santé ). The secondary objective was to describe these rates during the same period in 2019., Design: A cluster randomised controlled trial, with clusters being GPs., Setting: Primary care, 149 GPs from eight French regions., Participants: Patients ≥70 years old with chronic CVD or ≥18 years old with MHD., Interventions: A standardised GP-initiated phone call aiming to evaluate patient's need for urgent care (vs usual care for control groups)., Primary and Secondary Outcome Measures: The occurrence of at least one hospitalisation at end point 31 October 2020 (randomisation 30 April 2020), excluding those starting on 30 April 2020, was measured as planned. Another main outcome was the occurrence of at least one specialised consultation during the same period. These 6 month effects were studied, using a logistic regression model within a generalised estimating equation framework, for each subtrial., Results: 4640 patients were included: 3274 cardiovascular (mean age 79.9±7.0 years; 57.8% male) and 1366 psychiatric (53.2±7.0; 36.5%). For both subtrials, the intervention patients were significantly more hospitalised than the control patients, respectively, 17.3% versus 14.9% of CVD patients (OR=1.26 (1.05 to 1.52)); 14.4% versus 10.7% of MHD patients (OR=1.40 (1.00 to 1.96)). During the same period in 2019, the hospitalisation rates were, respectively, 16.3%, 18.2%, 15.8% and 14.8%. The proportions of patients with at least one specialised consultation were not different between the intervention and control groups, respectively, 24.6% versus 24.3% for CVD patients (OR=1.06 (0.85 to 1.32)); 26.5% versus 24.4% for MHD patients (OR=1.15 (0.84 to 1.57)). During the same period in 2019, these rates were, respectively, 22.7%, 24.6%, 28.0% and 25.5%., Conclusions: The intervention was associated with higher rates of hospitalisation at 6 months in patients with MHD or CVD. No intervention impact was found in outpatient care. These results are difficult to interpret because of a potential artefact induced by national campaigns promoting medical use during lockdown, overlapping the study inclusion period. This study showed that medico-administrative databases could represent a complementary cost-effective tool to clinical research for long-term and healthcare consumption outcomes., Trial Registration Number: NCT04359875., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Chronic conditions are a significant public health concern due to their rising prevalence, association with high mortality, and substantial healthcare costs. General practitioners play a crucial role in managing these conditions, and quality indicators are essential tools for assessing the quality of care. Electronic feedback reports incorporating quality indicator performance have shown promise in improving care quality. However, most studies have focused on single conditions or link feedback to financial incentives, which may not sustain long-term practice changes. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a multi-condition electronic feedback reports on quality indicator performance in Swiss general practice without financial incentives., Methods: This randomized controlled trial involves general practitioners enrolled in the FIRE project, a database of electronic medical records from Swiss primary care. Participants are randomized to receive either a plain feedback report or a comprehensive quality indicator -specific feedback report bi-monthly for 12 months. The plain feedback report contains descriptive summaries of practice activities, while the quality indicator-specific feedback report includes performance data on 14 quality indicators across cardiovascular, endocrine, pulmonary, and renal domains. The quality indicators were selected in multi-step process involving review of the literature and clinical guidelines, domain expert consultations, and a panel discussion with general practitioners. The primary study objective is to compare the effectiveness of the quality indicator-specific feedback report and of the plain feedback report with respect to the performance of the selected quality indicators., Conclusion: The study addresses a critical gap by evaluating a multi-condition feedback report without financial incentives. Its findings can inform future health policies and strategies, in line with national and international initiatives that promote or even require the implementation of quality measurement activities in general practice., Trial Registration: Trial registry: ISRCTN. Registration number: ISRCTN10637092, https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN10637092. Registered January 9, 2024., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2024 Jäger et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Background: Since its introduction, telemedicine for patients with chronic diseases has been studied in various clinical settings. However, there is limited evidence of the effectiveness and medical safety of the nationwide adoption of telemedicine., Objective: This study aimed to analyze the effects of telemedicine on chronic diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic under a temporary telemedicine policy in South Korea using national claims data., Methods: Health insurance claims data were extracted over 2 years: 1 year before (from February 24, 2019, to February 23, 2020) and 1 year after the policy was implemented (from February 24, 2020, to February 23, 2021). We included all patients who used telemedicine at least once in the first year after the policy was implemented and compared them with a control group of patients who never used telemedicine. The comparison focused on health care use; the medication possession ratio (MPR); and admission rates to general wards (GWs), emergency departments (EDs), and intensive care units (ICUs) using difference-in-differences analysis. A total of 4 chronic diseases were targeted: hypertension, diabetes mellitus (DM), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and common mental disorders., Results: A total of 1,773,454 patients with hypertension; 795,869 patients with DM; 37,460 patients with COPD; and 167,084 patients with common mental disorders were analyzed in this study. Patients diagnosed with hypertension or DM showed increased MPRs without an increase in GW, ED, or ICU admission rates during the policy year. Moreover, patients in the DM group who did not use telemedicine had higher rates of ED, GW, and ICU admissions, and patients in the hypertension group had higher rates of GW or ICU admissions after 1 year of policy implementation. This trend was not evident in COPD and common mental disorders., Conclusions: The temporary telemedicine policy was effective in increasing medication adherence and reducing admission rates for patients with hypertension and DM; however, the efficacy of the policy was limited for patients with COPD and common mental disorders. Future studies are required to demonstrate the long-term effects of telemedicine policies with various outcome measures reflecting disease characteristics., (©Ji Ye Kang, Weon Jung, Hyun Ji Kim, Ji Hyun An, Hee Yoon, Taerim Kim, Hansol Chang, Sung Yeon Hwang, Jong Eun Park, Gun Tak Lee, Won Chul Cha, Sejin Heo, Se Uk Lee. Originally published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance (https://publichealth.jmir.org), 20.11.2024.)

Objectives: To evaluate changes in anxiety, care experiences and condition impact among adolescents with chronic health conditions in two countries as they transfer to adult healthcare and to assess factors influencing anxiety levels., Design: A longitudinal international study. Data was collected by questionnaires before (2017-2021) and a year after (2018-2022) transfer of care., Setting: Two specialist hospitals in Finland and Australia., Participants: 440 adolescents with chronic health conditions were recruited from Finland (FIN n=237; mean age 17.2) and Australia (AUS n=203; mean age 18.3) with the answering percentage FIN 68.8% and AUS 55.2% of the first time point., Main Outcome Measures: The validated State-Trait Anxiety Inventory short form (STAI) was used to measure care-related anxiety. Care experiences were measured using eight questions from the Adolescent-Friendly Hospital Survey. Self-reported condition impact was measured by a Visual Analogue Scale. Care experiences, condition impact, country and age were included in regression analyses as predictors of care-related anxiety., Results: At baseline, there were few clinically meaningful differences between participants at the two sites. Adolescents reported positive care experiences both before and after the transfer of care. In regression analyses after the transfer of care, adolescents with lower condition impact experienced lower anxiety levels than adolescents with higher condition impact (beta -9.00, 95% CI -13.85 to 4.16, p<0.001). After the transfer of care, adolescents who reported negative care experiences also reported higher anxiety (median STAI score 40.0 (IQR 30.0-50.0) versus 33.3 (IQR 23.3-41.6), p<0.001)., Conclusion: Across two different healthcare systems, most adolescents with chronic health conditions reported low anxiety and positive care experiences before and after transfer to adult healthcare. Beyond efforts to generally enhance positive care experiences, focusing on adolescents with higher-impact chronic conditions may reduce disease-related anxiety., Trial Registration Number: ClinicalTrials.org NCT04631965, submitted 21 October 2020., Competing Interests: Competing interests: All authors will complete the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at http://www.icmje.org/disclosure-of-interest/., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objectives: This systematic review aims to identify, appraise and synthesise the findings of published qualitative research exploring the barriers and facilitators to self-management of chronic conditions reported by women., Design: A systematic literature review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies., Data Sources: A search of MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase and PsycInfo was undertaken using the search terms 'Women', 'Woman' 'Female,' 'Chronic', 'Long-term', 'Disease', 'Illness', 'Condition' 'Health,' 'Self-management,' 'Qualitative,' 'Barrier' and 'Facilitator'. A hand search for literature was also performed., Eligibility Criteria: Studies published before 2005 and those not in English were excluded., Data Extraction and Synthesis: Extracted data were analysed thematically and emerging and recurring themes identified. Themes were mapped to the six components of the COM-B model. Critical appraisal of included publications was undertaken using the CASP (Critical Appraisal Skills Programme) qualitative checklist and finding weighted on quality., Results: Eighty-four publications were identified and eligible for inclusion within the review. Studies were conducted in five continents, with a focus on 20 different chronic conditions and included a total of 1788 women. Barriers and facilitators to physical capability, psychological capability, physical opportunity, social opportunity, autonomic motivation and reflective motivation were identified with a number of recurring themes found. Self-prioritisation, support and culture all had a significant impact on whether women followed self-management recommendations. Certain groups of women such as those living remotely, those with financial difficulties, migrants and those who do not speak the predominant language appear to face additional barriers to self-management., Conclusions: This review highlights that to self-manage chronic conditions women have to overcome various cultural, financial and social barriers. Self-management programmes should be designed taking into account these factors in order to ensure women are better supported and enabled to improve their health outcomes., Competing Interests: Competing interests: LD and RK are co-applicants of the NIHR/HTA funded Treatment of Prolapse with Self-Care Pessary (TOPSY) study., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objective: To identify primary care structures and processes that have the highest and lowest impact on chronic disease management and screening and prevention outcomes as well as to assess the feasibility of implementing these structures and processes into practice., Design: A two-round Delphi study was conducted to establish consensus on the impact and feasibility of 258 primary care structures and processes., Participants: 29 primary care providers, health system leaders and health services researchers in the USA., Outcomes: Primary outcomes were (1) consensus on the impact of each structure and process on chronic disease management and screening and prevention outcomes, separately and (2) consensus on feasibility of implementation by primary care practices., Results: Consensus on high impact and feasibility of implementation was reached on four items for chronic disease management: 'Providers use motivational interviewing to help patients set goals', 'Practice has designated staff to manage patient panel', 'Practice has onsite providers or staff that speak the most dominant, non-English language spoken by patients' and 'Practice includes mental health providers and/or behavioural health specialists in care team' and seven items for screening and prevention: 'Practice utilizes standing protocols and orders', 'Practice generates reports to alert clinicians to missed targets and to identify gaps in care, such as overdue visits, needed vaccinations, screenings or other preventive services', 'Practice has designated staff to manage patient panel', 'Practice sets performance goals and uses benchmarking to track quality of care', 'Practice uses performance feedback to identify practice-specific areas of improvement', 'Practice builds quality improvement activities into practice operations' and 'Pre-visit planning data are reviewed during daily huddles'. Only 'Practice has designated staff to manage patient panel' appeared on both lists., Conclusion: Findings suggest that practices need to focus on implementing mostly distinct, rather than common, structures and processes to optimise chronic disease and preventive care., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: As South Africa's population rapidly ages, the burden of non-communicable diseases and the challenges of performing daily care activities among older individuals are increasing. This study investigates trends in self-reported difficulties with daily care activities among older adults in South Africa and examines the association between these difficulties, sociodemographic factors, and chronic conditions., Methods: The study used cross-sectional data from ten rounds of South Africa General Household Survey (2012-2021). Sample population included 26,362 men and 42,400 women aged 60 years and above. The outcome measure was assessed by self-reported difficulty in performing basic care activities such as washing or dressing., Results: Between 2012 and 2021, the percentage of participants reporting "A lot of difficulty" increased by 79.75%, "Some difficulty" increased by 112.11%, while "Unable to do" decreased by 8.97%. The risk of self-care difficulties was higher for men (RR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.02, 1.20) and increased with age: RR = 1.24 (95% CI = 1.08, 1.42) for ages 65-69; RR = 2.27 (95% CI = 2.00, 2.58) for ages 70-74; and RR = 5.65 (95% CI = 5.08, 6.28) for ages 75+. Not being currently married (RR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.51, 1.79), being of African/Black (RR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.06, 1.38) or Coloured race (RR = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.21, 1.65), and having diabetes (RR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.34, 1.55), hypertension (RR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.26, 1.45), or asthma (RR = 1.30, 95% CI = 1.14, 1.48) were also associated with a higher risk of self-care difficulties., Conclusion: There was a notable increase in the proportion of participants reporting significant difficulty and some difficulty in performing self-care tasks, while a decrease was observed in the category of participants unable to do such tasks. Health policies should prioritize the specific needs of vulnerable sociodemographic and health groups, considering their increased risk of self-care difficulties., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: There is a growing prevalence of nonhealing wounds and chronic diseases in society, and there is an associated need for wound management solutions that include the use of telemedicine. A broad spectrum of factors influences the planning and execution of interventions within telemedicine in chronic wound management, spanning organizations, technologies, and individuals, including professionals and patients. The Telemedicine and Ambulatory Wound Care Team (TELE-AMBUS) project applies a whole-system research approach to account for this spectrum of factors., Objective: The primary objective of this study was to explore and analyze the implementation and consequences of an outpatient wound management model, comprising 2 interconnected quality improvement interventions (ie, telemedicine and ambulatory wound care team) aimed at older and vulnerable patients with chronic wounds, across the specialist and primary health care sectors. Embedded in this objective is the aim to improve the competence levels of health care providers and, consequently, the service quality of outpatient wound management across specialist and primary health care services., Methods: This project examines the implementation and consequences of an outpatient wound management model through a combined process and economic evaluation research strategy. A sociotechnical system theory approach and multiple work package design support the examination. The project uses observations, conversations, interviews, and economic assessments to gather rich, in-depth insights and understanding on why and how the new wound management model contributes to a change or not compared with the traditional treatment model., Results: The project has been funded from 2021 to 2025. Baseline interviews have been conducted since April 2022 and concluded in January 2024. Fieldwork, including nonparticipant observations, semistructured interviews, and informal conversations, has been conducted since November 2022 and is expected to conclude in March 2025. In parallel and as part of the cost-effectiveness analyses, time usage data on the outpatient and regular clinical models are being gathered during the fieldwork., Conclusions: We applied a whole-system approach in multiple ways, that is, to design or inform our fieldwork and to explore, evaluate, and translate project findings into practice across services. To our knowledge, this approach has not been undertaken in telemedicine in chronic wound management literature and associated human factors and ergonomics research. Thus, our approach can produce both original and novel research and theoretical results internationally., International Registered Report Identifier (irrid): DERR1-10.2196/55502., (©Sindre Aske Høyland, Kari Anne Holte, Olaug Øygarden, Kamrul Islam, Egil Kjerstad, Ragnhild Gjerstad-Sørensen, Synnøve Aske Høyland, Hanne Rusten Wærnes, Pascale Carayon, Maureen Fallon, Sarah Bradbury, Marcus Gürgen, Sissel Eikeland Husebø, Eirin Rødseth. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 04.11.2024.)

Background: The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that adolescents with chronic health conditions begin to assume responsibility for their own care by age 14. The goal of this qualitative one-time interview study is to learn how 14- to 16-year-old adolescents with chronic health conditions begin to develop self-management skills and the role that caregivers play in the learning process., Methods: Twenty adolescents ages 14-16 with chronic renal (n = 5), gastrointestinal (n = 5), hematologic (n = 5), or rheumatologic (n = 5) diseases, and 20 caregivers (dyads), completed individual semi-structured interviews discussing the adolescents' current degree of self-management. Six coders analyzed transcripts using thematic framework analysis., Results: Three primary themes emerged: continuum, motivations, and tools. Both adolescents and caregivers described progress along a self-management continuum with varying levels of responsibility for the adolescents, ranging from passive to responsible. Caregivers' behaviors similarly varied from directive management to supported self-management. Motivations for self-management skills were described in relation to one's health, self, and others. Families utilized a variety of tools to facilitate movement toward supported self-management with the adolescent., Conclusions: The development of adolescent self-management of their chronic condition is a complex, shifting continuum between caregiver and adolescent. This continuum may be impacted by adolescent motivation and tools/problem solving available to the family. Pediatric healthcare providers can support self-management by assessing and attending to each patient's motivations; building a road map individualized to each patient's skills; and offering time in outpatient clinic to practice self-management strategies., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Chronic constipation is one of the most common health disorders in all of medicine. Its extent ranges from mild discomfort, which is usually easy to improve, to severe functional limitations that may significantly reduce quality of life and may be refractory to various treatment approaches. Our understanding of the pathomechanism has grown considerably in recent years and has also led to important new therapeutic developments. The resulting treatment options and recommendations are presented in the current update of the S2k constipation guideline in an evidence-based and practical manner. The respective significance of traditional and recent drug developments is classified and categorized in modern "step-up" treatment strategies. In particular, numerous important aspects of everyday practice are addressed, such as questions on long-term treatment and therapeutic options in specific constellations (adequate treatment of constipation in older people, constipation during pregnancy, and drug-induced [especially opioid-induced]constipation).The most important new developments (i.e. new therapeutic approaches, but also re-evaluations of "traditional" laxatives and the importance of careful diagnostics in therapy-refractory patients) are summarized in this article., Competing Interests: Vortrags- und/oder Beratungshonorare: VA: Arena, Falk, Hexal, Kyow Kirin, Medice, Shionogi PL: Allergan, Abbvie, Falk, Ardeypharm, Medice, Nordmark, Norgine, (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

This umbrella review of 34 meta-analyses, representing 235 randomised controlled trials done across 52 countries and 48 957 participants and ten chronic conditions, aimed to evaluate evidence on the efficacy of mobile phone interventions for populations with chronic diseases. We evaluated the strengths of evidence via the Fusar-Poli and Radua methodology. Compared with usual care, mobile apps had convincing effects on glycated haemoglobin reduction among adults with type 2 diabetes (d=0·44). Highly suggestive effects were found for both text messages and apps on various outcomes, including medication adherence (among patients with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa and people with cardiovascular disease), glucose management in type 2 diabetes, and blood pressure reduction in hypertension. Many effects (42%) were non-significant. Various gaps were identified, such as a scarcity of reporting on moderators and publication bias by meta-analyses, little research in low-income and lower-middle-income countries, and little reporting on adverse events., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests SS has received research grants from the US National Institutes of Health and the Mind & Life Institute. OS has received research grants from Ekhaga Foundation and Olle Engkvist Foundation, has once received a payment from Mindfully Sweden for educational content, and was a cofounder of Eudelics AB. STM has received research grants from the National Institutes of Health. JT is an unpaid scientific adviser for Precision Mental Wellness with stock options. SBG has received research grants from the US National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, the Hope for Depression Research Foundation, the Brain and Behavior Research Foundation, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, the Center for Healthy Minds, and the University of Wisconsin–Madison; payments for reviewing grants from the National Institutes of Health and the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; and payments for delivering lectures from Chemnitz University of Technology and Veterans Affairs Canada., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Pediatric palliative care is a holistic care of children suffering from life-threatening or life-limiting illnesses and encompasses care of a child's body, mind, and spirit and involves giving support to the family. According to the Global Atlas of Palliative Care, 6% of the global need for palliative care is in children. In order to provide palliative care, one needs to identify and diagnose the conditions requiring palliative care. There has always been a confusion in identifying pediatric conditions requiring palliative care. There is a lot of inconsistency in the diagnosis of such conditions particularly in pre-verbal patients. This study attempts to generate more data about the common palliative care conditions and complaints with which the children present to tertiary care hospitals. To study the socio-demographic details, clinical profile, CCC (complex chronic conditions) designation, and the ACT/ RCPCH (Association for Children with Life-threatening or Terminal Conditions and the Royal College of Pediatrics and Child Health) classification of children suffering from chronic conditions requiring palliative care. The study was conducted as a single-center retrospective observational study of pediatric patients enrolled for palliative care at a tertiary care hospital in a metropolitan city in India from 01.06.2021 to 31.06.2022. The total sample size was 400. The socio-demographic data and the clinical profile were recorded from the case records of all the 400 patients. Classification of the conditions was done as per the CCC as well as the ACT/ RCPCH classification system. The mean age in our study was 5.15 years and there was a slighter male (59.5%) preponderance. They presented in OPDs with acute symptoms such as fatigue and fever, and they had other symptoms like tightness of the body, constipation, seizures, and difficulty in swallowing. Majority of the children (55%) were suffering from neurologic and neuromuscular conditions as per CCC followed by hematologic and immunologic conditions (10%). Category 4 (irreversible but non-progressive conditions causing severe disability, leading to susceptibility to health) was reported as the most common category according to the ACT/RCPCH.    Conclusion: Children suffering from chronic disease conditions requiring palliative care usually suffer from multiple symptoms which affect their daily life. As most of the patients belong to category 4 according to ACT/RCPCH which is an irreversible but non-progressive life-limiting condition, the course of the disease is prolonged, therefore requiring comprehensive care and services for a long time. It is necessary to establish more pediatric palliative care units to address the needs of such children. What is known: • Pediatric palliative care is a specialized area within palliative care, which focusses on the needs of children with life-limiting illnesses. • Data on pediatric palliative care has largely been limited to oncological conditions. There is a paucity of literature documenting the needs among children suffering from non-cancerous chronic conditions. What is new: • This study provides vital information with respect to palliative care burden among children mainly suffering from non-oncological conditions. • It also provides clinical and socio-demographic profile of the children suffering from chronic life-limiting conditions requiring palliative care in a tertiary hospital setting in a LMIC (low- or middle-income country)., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Chronic lateral epicondylitis (LE), normally known as tennis elbow, is often managed by conservative treatments. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) and local corticosteroid injection (LCI) are among the most commonly used conservative treatments. However, the comparison between these two interventions remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of ESWT and LCI for chronic LE. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched for eligible studies until April 20, 2024. Meta-analyses were conducted using Manager V.5.4.1. Pooled effect sizes were expressed as the weighted mean difference (WMD) or odds ratio (OR), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A total of six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Compared with LCI, ESWT had inferior change in visual analogue scale (Δ VAS) (WMD, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.48; I 2  = 20%; p < 0.001), Δ grip strength (WMD, -4.01; 95% CI, -5.57 to -2.44; I 2  = 36%; p < 0.001), change in patient-rated tennis elbow evaluation (Δ PRTEE) score (WMD, 8.64; 95% CI, 4.70 to 12.58; I 2  = 0%; p < 0.001) at 1-month follow-up, but superior Δ VAS (WMD, -1.15; 95% CI, -1.51 to -0.80; I 2  = 6%; p < 0.001), Δ grip strength (WMD, 2.04; 95% CI, 0.90 to 3.18; I 2  = 3%; p = 0.0005), Δ PRTEE score (WMD, -9.50; 95% CI, -14.05 to -4.95; I 2  = 58%; p < 0.001) at 3-month follow-up, and superior Δ VAS (WMD, -1.81; 95% CI, -2.52 to -1.10; I 2  = 33%; p < 0.001), Δ grip strength (WMD, 3.06; 95% CI, 0.90 to 5.21; I 2  = 0%; p = 0.005) at 6-month follow-up. The two groups had a similarly low rate of adverse events (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.05 to 8.60; I 2  = 67%; p = 0.77), all of which were mild. Both ESWT and LCI are effective and safe in treating chronic LE. Compared with LCI, ESWT showed inferior short-term (1-month) but superior long-term (3-month and 6-month) outcomes regarding pain relief and function recovery, with a similar rate of mild adverse events., (© 2024 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Background: The Academy of Homeopathy Education is a US-based accredited teaching institution offering homeopathy education services to professional and medically licensed homeopathy students. This study reports on clinical outcomes from the teaching clinic from 2020 to 2021., Methods: Data collected using the patient-generated outcome measure, the Measure Yourself Concerns and Wellbeing (MYCaW), were anonymized. Mean MYCaW values for initial and subsequent consultations were analyzed for the degree of change across the intervention period in 38 clients. Each client listed up to two complaints. MYCaW scores between initial and subsequent consultations were analyzed for the degree of change (delta) across the intervention period., Results: A total of 95 body system-related symptoms were analyzed for change in intensity following the homeopathic intervention. Statistically significant improvements in the intensity of main symptoms were observed between initial and subsequent follow-ups. The main symptom scores showed a mean change in intensity (delta MYCaW) of -0.79 points (95% confidence interval (CI), -1.29 to -0.29; p  = 0.003) at first follow-up, a mean change of -1.67 points (95% CI, -2.34 to -0.99; p  = 0.001) at second follow-up compared with the initial visit, and a mean change of -1.93 points (95% CI, -3.0 to -0.86; p  = 0.008) at third follow-up compared with the initial visit. For clients with four or more follow-ups, the mean delta MYCaW was -1.57 points (95% CI, -2.86 to -0.28; p  = 0.039)., Conclusion: Statistically significant improvements as well as some clinically meaningful changes in symptom intensity were found across a diverse group of individuals with a variety of long-term chronic conditions. The improvement was evident across different body systems and different levels of chronicity. There are limitations to the generalizability of the study due to the research design. Further research and investigation are warranted given the promising results of this work., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work., (The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).)

Food is Medicine (FIM) programs to improve the accessibility of fruits and vegetables (FVs) or other healthy foods among patients with low income and diet-related chronic diseases are promising to improve food and nutrition security in the United States (US). However, FIM programs are relatively new and implementation guidance for healthcare settings using an implementation science lens is lacking. We used a narrative review to describe the evidence base on barriers and facilitators to FIM program integration in US healthcare settings following the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment (EPIS) Framework. Evidence surrounding the EPIS Inner Context was a focus, including constructs Leadership, Organizational Characteristics, Quality and Fidelity Monitoring and Support, Organizational Staffing Processes, and Individual Characteristics. Peer-reviewed and grey literature about barriers and facilitators to FIM programs were of interest, defined as programs that screen and refer eligible patients with diet-related chronic disease experiencing food insecurity to healthy, unprepared foods. Thirty-one sources were included in the narrative review, including 22 peer-reviewed articles, four reports, four toolkits, and one thesis. Twenty-eight sources (90%) described EPIS Inner Context facilitators and 26 sources (84%) described FIM program barriers. The most common barriers and facilitators to FIM programs were regarding Quality and Fidelity Monitoring and Support (e.g., use of electronic medical records for tracking and evaluation, strategies to support implementation) and Organizational Staffing Processes (e.g., clear delineation of staff roles and capacity); although, barriers and facilitators to FIM programs were identified among all EPIS Inner Context constructs. We synthesized barriers and facilitators to create an EPIS-informed implementation checklist for healthcare settings for use among healthcare organizations/providers, partner organizations, and technical assistance personnel. We discuss future directions to align FIM efforts with implementation science terminology and theories, models, and frameworks to improve the implementation evidence base and support FIM researchers and practitioners., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: The World Health Organisation (WHO) recommends that health professionals develop and implement "adherence counselling toolkits" to promote adherence to long-term therapies in people with chronic conditions. This prospectively registered review aimed to systematically identify and evaluate existing toolkits developed to promote adherence to physical activity in people with chronic conditions., Materials and Methods: Grey literature and six e-databases were searched for studies investigating the use of "toolkits" to promote adherence to physical activity or exercise recommendations in people with chronic conditions (Medline, PsycInfo, EmCare, Cochrane, CINAHL Plus, Pedro). A two-stage screening process was completed by two independent reviewers., Results: Five studies describing five toolkits were included. Three toolkits displayed all WHO recommended features, including information on adherence, a clinically useful way of using this information, and behavioural tools for maintaining habits. The included toolkits featured "adherence" to the intervention; however, this was not their primary aim. There were trends towards improved physical activity with some of the included toolkits., Conclusions: There are a lack of rigorously developed toolkits that focus on adherence to physical activity in people with chronic conditions. Toolkits should be developed, tested, and implemented to improve adherence and outcomes for people with chronic conditions.

Objectives: Health technology assessment bodies advocate capturing the value of interventions in terms of their benefits to health and broader welfare. The wider societal impacts (WSI) framework considers how changes in health alter a person's net contribution to society-that is, what they produce minus what they consume. In this research, we review this framework and explore the scope to differentiate WSI by equity-relevant sociodemographic characteristics., Methods: This research updates previous calculations using publicly available data from population-based surveys in the United Kingdom. We then estimate for 199 chronic conditions: (1) WSI for the average person with the condition and (2) gain in WSI for an improvement of 0.1 in health-related quality of life score., Results: The nature and availability of information varied across population-based surveys and precluded analyses to examine WSI by population subgroup. Our updated estimates mirrored earlier findings that consideration of the broader societal impacts of health would reprioritize interventions compared with assessment on health alone. For example, for the same improvement in health, a woman experiencing diseases of the circulatory system has the highest potential gain in WSI (£354/month) whereas a man experiencing HIV has the lowest potential gain (£233/month)., Conclusions: The WSI framework provides a simple, indirect method to inform resource allocation decisions. Understanding the equity implications of this approach was hindered by differences in the information collected across population-based surveys. Findings demonstrate the potential reprioritization that may occur if the broader welfare benefits of health interventions were used to inform coverage decisions., Competing Interests: Author Disclosures Author disclosure forms can be accessed below in the Supplemental Material section., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Purpose: With the increasing aging of the population and the increasing incidence of chronic diseases in China, home hospice care services can meet the desire of the older adult with chronic diseases to receive care and die at home. In order to ensure the real application of hospice in families, the goal of the study was to construct a home hospice care program for the older adult at the end of life with chronic diseases based on Harmony Nursing Theory (composed of three parts: harmony needs assessment, harmony mechanism establishment and interpersonal interaction)., Methods: Through literature review, a qualitative interview and group discussion, the first draft of a home hospice care program for the older adult at the end of life with chronic diseases based on the harmony nursing theory was developed, which was further revised and finalized by combining the Delphi method of expert correspondence with 19 experts and a pilot study with a home hospice care team., Results: A total of two rounds of expert correspondence were conducted. In the first round, 21 questionnaires were distributed and 19 were returned, yielding a recovery rate of 90.48%. In the second round, 19 questionnaires were distributed, and 19 questionnaires were collected. The recovery rate was 100%. The authority of the two rounds of expert correspondence was 0.96, and Kendall's coefficient of concordance (W) was 0.268 and 0.310, respectively. After the first round of Delphi expert consultation, 3 items were deleted, and 12 items were revised. In the second round of Delphi expert consultation, two items were revised. The final version of the home hospice program includes 4 first-level items, 20 second-level items, and 59 third-level items., Conclusion: The home hospice care program based on harmony nursing theory is authoritative and scientific and can provide a reference for the practice of home hospice care for the older adult with chronic diseases., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work., (© 2024 Wang et al.)

Allogeneic platelet-rich plasma (al-PRP) is gaining attention in clinical practice for treating chronic refractory wounds, though research results remain controversial. To assess the clinical efficacy of al-PRP for chronic refractory wounds. Databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI, SinoMed, VIP, and WFPD were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing al-PRP with conventional treatments up to October 2023. Two researchers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed quality. Statistical analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4, and potential publication bias was assessed and corrected using funnel plots and Egger's test. Twelve studies with 717 cases were included. Meta-analysis showed al-PRP significantly improved outcomes compared to non-al-PRP treatments: increased healing rate (RR 2.72, 95% CI 1.77-4.19, p < 0.00001), shortened healing time (SMD - 1.03, 95% CI -1.31 to -0.75, p < 0.00001), improved efficacy rate (RR 1.19, 95% CI 1.10-1.28, p < 0.00001), increased wound shrinkage (MD 35.65%, 95% CI 21.65-49.64, p < 0.00001), and reduced hospital stays (MD -2.62, 95% CI -4.35 to -0.90, p = 0.003). Al-PRP is a feasible, effective, and safe biological therapy for chronic refractory wounds.Trial registration: PROSPERO Identifier CRD42022374920., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Chronic heart failure patients experience large disparities in quality of and access to treatment, with rural populations receiving lower levels of care. Telemonitoring of patients is increasingly being used as an important tool for improving patient management and care and might reduce geographical inequities in healthcare., Methods: We investigate the presence and magnitude of a geospatial interaction effect on the health benefit of a supplementary telemedicine intervention, by analyzing the relationship between distance to regular place of treatment and the benefit of telemedicine in a secondary analysis of data from a previously conducted RCT. We use change in EQ5D health status, SF-36 Physical component score and SF-36 Mental component score as the outcomes. In the unadjusted analysis, intervention group and distance group and the interaction term are included as the independent variables, in the adjusted analysis, multiple socioeconomic and health related variables are included to account for potential confounders., Results: We find evidence of a significant interaction between the effects of telemedicine and long distance to treatment for change in EQ5D health status (unadjusted: p = 0.016, adjusted p = 0.009) and unadjusted but not adjusted mental component score (unadjusted: p = 0.013, adjusted p = 0.0728), for the change in physical component score the interaction term was not significant (unadjusted: p = 0.118, adjusted p = 0.092)., Conclusion: In our study we find that supplementary telemedicine is likely to reduce the health access inequities associated with geographical distance for chronic heart failure patients. However, our sample size was modest and further research is needed to confirm these findings., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

The use of dietary supplements by patients with chronic liver disease is prevalent and rising. Despite the known risks of dietary supplements, including hepatotoxicity, adulteration, and contamination, patients with chronic liver disease often turn to dietary supplements to support their liver and/or overall health but are not necessarily empowered with the information or guidance from their liver practitioner to do so. This article provides practitioners with a framework for balancing the risks and benefits of dietary supplements in patients with chronic liver disease, offering examples of independent resources and certifications to use this framework in clinical practice. We offer 3 common clinical scenarios to highlight how the use of this framework can improve communication and decision-making in clinical practice. By adapting principles from Integrative Medicine, this article advocates for a patient-centered approach to dietary supplements in patients with chronic liver disease, encouraging open dialogue between clinicians and their patients to facilitate informed decision-making and personalized care., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

Background: Telemedicine holds immense potential to revolutionise healthcare delivery, particularly in resource-limited settings and for patients with chronic diseases. Despite proven benefits and policy reforms, the use of telemedicine remains low due to several patient, technology, and system-level barriers. Assisted telemedicine employs trained health professionals to connect patients with physicians, which can improve access and scope of telemedicine. The study aims to describe the design, service utilisation and chronic disease outcomes following the implementation of an assisted telemedicine initiative., Methods: This is an observational implementation study. Barriers and potential solutions to the implementation of telemedicine were identified through interviews with key stakeholders. The assisted telemedicine solution using an interoperable platform integrating electronic health records, point-of-care diagnostics, and electronic clinical decision support systems was designed and piloted at three telemedicine clinics in Tamil Nadu, India. Nurses were trained in platform use and facilitation of tele-consultations. Health records of all patients from March 2021 to June 2023 were included in the analysis. Data were analysed to assess the utilisation of clinic services and improvements in health outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus and hypertension., Results: Over 2.4 years, 11,388 patients with a mean age of 45 (± 20) years and median age of 48 years, predominantly female (59.3%), accessed the clinics. The team completed 15,437 lab investigations and 26,998 consultations. Among 5542 (48.6%) patients that reported chronic conditions, diabetes mellitus (61%) and hypertension (45%) were the most frequent. In patients with diabetes mellitus and hypertension, 43% and 75.3% were newly diagnosed, respectively. Diabetes mellitus and hypertension patients had significant reductions in fasting blood sugar (-33.0 mg/dL (95% CI (-42.4, -23.7, P < 0.001)), and systolic (-9.6 mmHg (95% CI (-12.1, -7.0), P < 0.0001)) and diastolic blood pressure (-5.5 mmHg (95% CI (-7.0, -4.08), P < 0.0001)) at nine months from first visit, respectively., Conclusions: The 'Digisahayam' model demonstrated feasibility in enhancing healthcare accessibility and quality by bridging healthcare gaps, diagnosing chronic conditions, and improving patient outcomes. The model presents a scalable and sustainable approach to revolutionising patient care and achieving digital health equity, with the potential for adaptation in similar settings worldwide., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Community-based chronic care intervention is important in the control and prevention of lifelong conditions such as podoconiosis and similar 'intensive disease management' neglected tropical diseases (NTDs). Despite a call for such interventions, few efforts have been made to identify opportunities and challenges related to their implementation. Employing a qualitative approach, this study explored the possibility of engaging community actors, physical places and networks to promote chronic care management in rural Ethiopia. We gathered data from affected individuals, community members, local leaders, health professionals and community health workers between April and May 2022. The study revealed that affected individuals, family members, religious leaders, traditional leaders, and health professionals have the potential to extend chronic care management in rural areas. Houses, churches, schools, and healthcare facilities are suitable venues at which to perform interventions. Strong community solidarity and political will are vital to chronic care interventions, while lack of understanding about chronic conditions, financial constraints, and limited resources at healthcare facilities could pose challenges. Using community assets has great promise for expanding chronic care management with minimal costs and efforts in under resourced areas. Achieving this will require a successful plan to coordinate the collaboration among the agents and settings., Competing Interests: The research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationship that could be considered as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright: © 2024 Engdawork et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Background: The International Survey of People living with Chronic Conditions (OECD-PaRIS survey), aims to systematically gather patient-reported experiences (PREMs) and - outcomes (PROMs) and potential predictors for these outcomes for persons with chronic conditions as well as information from professionals about health care provided. In such patient surveys, the advantages of a multilevel (nested) approach in which patients are sampled 'within providers' need to be balanced against the potential for bias if patient populations from participating GPs significantly differ from those of non-participating GPs. The objective was to assess the effects of general practitioner (GP) non-participation on the representativeness of the Norwegian patient data of the International Survey of People living with Chronic Conditions (OECD-PaRIS survey)., Methods: To test all aspects of the first main PaRIS survey, it was preceded by a field trial which this paper reports on the Norwegian part of. For the Norwegian part of the field trial in 2022, we randomly sampled and surveyed 75 GPs and 125 patients 45 years and older for each GP, regardless of whether their GP were also participating in the study. GPs were sampled from a national register that included all GPs. The surveys were primarily digital, but we sent postal questionnaires to non-digital patients and non-responding digital patients. We compared GP and patient characteristics as well as patient-reported experiences and outcomes according to GP participation status in bivariate analysis, supplemented with multiple linear regressions with PREMs/PROMs as dependent variables and participation status as independent adjusting for significant patient factors., Results: 17 of 75 sampled GPs participated (22.7%), of which 993 of 2,015 patients responded (49.3%). 3,347 of 7,080 patients of non-responding GPs answered (47.3%). Persons with chronic conditions from participating GPs reported significantly better patient-centred coordinated care (p = 0.017), overall experiences with the GP office the last 12 months (p = 0.004), mental well-being (p = 0.039) and mental health (p = 0.013) than patients from non-participating GPs. The raw differences between participating and non-participating GPs on patient-reported experiences and - outcomes varied from 1.5 to 2.9 points on a 0-100 scale, and from 2.2 to 3.0 after adjustment for case-mix., Conclusions: The Norwegian field trial indicates that estimates based on participants in the PaRIS survey may modestly overestimate patient-reported experiences and -outcomes at the aggregated level and the need for more research within and across countries to identify and address this potential bias., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: The prevalence of chronic conditions is increasing. Given that the majority of chronic patients are managed by primary healthcare providers, there is a need to integrate primary care with public health to address the prevailing situation and enhance patient outcomes. The purpose of this study is to establish, implement and evaluate an integrated primary care and public health model in China for patients with chronic conditions., Methods: This prospective, multicentre and observational study will be conducted at 12 township hospitals on patients (n=7200) diagnosed with chronic conditions (hypertensive, diabetic or stroke). Participants were divided into two groups: pilot areas and mainstream areas follow-up groups. The primary outcome will be the difference in the proportion of controlled chronic conditions among the two groups. Secondary outcomes will be the differences in mean change in diastolic and systolic blood pressures, fasting glucose, total cholesterol and triglyceride, death from any cause and participant-reported physical and psychological health status., Ethics and Dissemination: Ethics approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology. We plan to publish the results of this study in a peer-reviewed journal article., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: With the increasing prevalence of chronic diseases, the demand for medical services from chronic disease patients has become diversified and personalized. The advantages and role of traditional Chinese medicine in the prevention and treatment of chronic diseases gradually emerging. The preferences and willingness to pay for traditional Chinese medicine services (TCMS) among patients with chronic diseases, as well as any disparities between urban and rural patients, have not been examined in past studies., Objective: This study aimed to investigate the preferences of chronic disease patients for TCMS, explore the value/importance that patients place on different treatment attributes, and evaluate whether there are urban-rural differences in their preferences and willingness to pay for TCMS., Methods: A total of 317 patients from Jiangsu Province, China participated in a discrete choice experiment that elicited the preferences for TCMS. The choice questions were constructed by six attributes: out-of-pocket (OOP) cost, institution, medical provider, treatment method, treatment duration, treatment efficacy. Mixed logit models were used to estimate the stated preference and marginal willingness to pay for each attribute., Results: The choice preferences of chronic disease patients for TCMS in this study were influenced by the four attributes: institution, treatment method, and treatment efficacy, and OOP cost. Improvements in treatment efficacy were the most concerning, followed by being treated in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) hospital. Patients were willing to pay more to get better treatment outcomes. Compared with primary care institutions, patients were willing to pay more for treatment in TCM hospitals. The preferences for economic attribute (OOP cost) varied between urban and rural areas, and rural patients tended to favor scenarios that imposed a lower economic burden on them., Conclusion: The chronic disease patients' preferences for TCMS were determined mainly by treatment efficacy but also by institution, treatment method and OOP cost. The urban-rural difference in preference identified in this study highlights that effective policy interventions should consider the characteristics of patients' demand in different regions., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: The prevalence of chronic disease and multimorbidity is increasing and the associated disease and treatment burden is particularly heavy. Coordinated multidisciplinary, patient-centered care is particularly important for people living with chronic disease or multimorbidity. There was no valid tool to measure the quality of coordinated patient-centered care from the patient's perspective until the Patient-Centered Coordination by a Care Team (PCCCT) questionnaire was recently developed in Canada (Quebec/Ontario). The Quebecois version has been validated but is not directly transferable to France due to linguistic, cultural and health system differences between the two countries. To perform a cross-cultural adaptation of the Quebecois PCCCT questionnaire is therefore necessary to obtain a questionnaire's new version adapted for use in France, ensuring item and semantic equivalence., Methods: The adaptation process consisted of two stages, both of which were supervised by a scientific committee made up of five healthcare professionals. The first stage was a Delphi consensus involving a multidisciplinary healthcare professional panel to evaluate and harmonize the clarity and appropriateness of the questionnaire for patients in the French health system. During the second stage, adult patients with one or more chronic diseases, from various age, sex, socio-occupational categories, assessed the comprehensibility and conformity of the adapted version of the questionnaire resulting from stage 1 and improved it if necessary. This was achieved using cognitive interviews., Results: During Stage 1, two rounds were undertaken with 10 professional experts resulting in consensual reformulation of 10 out of the 14 items. These newly formulated items and the 4 remaining items were submitted to patients in Stage 2. Cognitive interviews were undertaken with 14 patients, testing 3 successively adapted versions of the questionnaire, until three consecutive patients did not find any ambiguity or misunderstanding. The final version resulting from the cross-cultural adaptation process aimed at being used in France, has item and semantic equivalence to the original Quebecois version., Conclusions: Measurement equivalence will be addressed in a future study. This French version is intended to be a useful resource for the health system reforms aimed at promoting more integrated and patient-centered care pathways., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Information and communications technology-based tailored management (TM) intervention is a novel automatic system in which a smartphone app for the management of patients with hypertension and diabetes, the provider web, and Bluetooth devices are linked. However, little evidence exists regarding the cost-effectiveness of the interventions using mobile apps., Objective: This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of TM intervention for adult patients with hypertension or diabetes in primary care compared with usual care (UC)., Methods: Cost-effectiveness analysis using a Markov model was conducted from the Korean health care system perspective. Based on 6-month outcome data from an information and communications technology-based tailored chronic disease management (ICT-CM) trial, effectiveness over a lifetime beyond the trial periods was extrapolated using a cardiovascular disease risk prediction model. Costs were estimated using ICT-CM trial data and national health insurance claims data. Health utility weights were obtained from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey., Results: In the base-case analysis, compared with UC, TM was more costly (US $23,157 for TM vs US $22,391 for UC) and more effective (12.006 quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs] for TM vs 11.868 QALYs for UC). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was US $5556 per QALY gained. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that the probability of TM being cost-effective compared with UC was approximately 97% at an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio threshold of US $26,515 (KRW 35 million) per QALY gained., Conclusions: Compared with UC, TM intervention is a cost-effective option for patients with hypertension or diabetes in primary care settings. The study results can assist policy makers in making evidence-based decisions when implementing accessible chronic disease management services., (©Sung-Hee Oh, Jae-Heon Kang, Jin-Won Kwon. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 11.10.2024.)

Background: Despite a substantial global improvement in infant and child mortality from communicable diseases since the early 1990s there is now a growing burden of chronic disease in children and adolescents worldwide, mimicking the trend seen in the adult population. Chronic diseases in children and adolescents can affect all aspects of their well-being and function with these burdens and their health-related consequences often carried into adulthood. Up to one third of disability-adjusted life years for children and adolescents globally are a result of chronic disease. This has profound implications for the broader family unit, communities, and health systems in which these children and young people reside. Models of chronic care delivery for children and adolescents with chronic disease have traditionally been adapted from adult models. There is a growing recognition that children and adolescents with chronic diseases have a unique set of healthcare needs. Their needs extend beyond disease education and management appropriate to the developmental stage of the child, to encompass psychological well-being for the entire family and a holistic care approach focusing on the social determinants of health. It is for this reason that patient navigators have been proposed as a potential intervention to help fulfil this critical healthcare gap. Patient navigators are trained medical or non-medical personnel (e.g. lay health workers, community health workers, nurses, or people with lived experience) who provide guidance for the patients (and their primary caregivers) as they move through complex (and often bewildering) medical and social systems. The navigator may deliver education, help to co-ordinate patient care, be an advocate for the patient (and their primary caregivers), or combinations of these. Patient navigators can assist people with a chronic illness (especially those who are vulnerable or from a marginalised population, or both) to better understand their diagnoses, treatment options, and available resources. As there is considerable variation in the purpose, design, and target population of patient navigator programmes, there is a need to systematically review and summarise the existing literature on the effectiveness of navigator programmes in children and young adults with chronic disease., Objectives: To assess the effectiveness of patient navigator programmes in children and adolescents with chronic diseases., Search Methods: We searched the Cochrane Library and Epistemonikos up to 20 January 2023 for related systematic reviews using search terms relevant to this review. We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL EBSCO, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov for primary studies., Selection Criteria: We included randomised controlled trials reporting the effect of patient navigator interventions on children and adolescents (aged 18 years or younger) with any chronic disease in hospital or community settings. Two review authors independently assessed the retrieved titles and abstracts, and where necessary, the full text to identify studies that satisfied the inclusion criteria., Data Collection and Analysis: Two review authors extracted data using a standard data extraction form. We used a random-effects model to perform a quantitative synthesis of the data. We used the I² statistic to measure heterogeneity amongst the studies in each analysis. We indicated summary estimates as mean differences (MD), where studies used the same scale, or standardised mean differences (SMD), where studies used different scales, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We used subgroup and univariate meta-regression to assess reasons for between-study differences. We used the Cochrane RoB 1 tool to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence., Main Results: We included 17 studies (2895 randomised participants). All studies compared patient navigators with standard care. Most studies were at unclear or high risk of bias. Meta-analysis was undertaken only for those studies that had the same duration of patient navigator intervention and follow-up/reporting of outcome measures. The evidence is very uncertain about the effects of patient navigator programmes compared with standard care on self-reported quality of life of children with chronic illness (SMD 0.63, 95% CI -0.20 to 1.47; I 2 = 96%; 4 studies, 671 participants; very low-certainty evidence); parent proxy-reported quality of life (SMD 0.09, 95% CI -2.21 to 2.40; I 2 = 99%; 2 studies, 309 participants; very low-certainty evidence); or parents' or caregivers' quality of life (SMD -1.98, 95% CI -4.13 to 0.17; I 2 = 99%; 3 studies, 757 participants; very low-certainty evidence). It is uncertain whether duration of patient navigator intervention accounts for any of the variances in the changes in quality of life. The evidence is very uncertain about the effects of patient navigator programmes compared with standard care on the number of hospital admissions (MD -0.05, 95% CI -0.34 to 0.23; I 2 = 99%; 2 studies, 381 participants; very low-certainty evidence) and the number of presentations to the emergency department (MD 0.06, 95% CI -0.23 to 0.34; I 2 = 98%; 2 studies, 381 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Furthermore, it is unclear whether patient navigator programmes reduce the number of missed school days as data were sparse (2 studies, 301 participants). Four studies (629 participants) reported data on resource use. However, given the variation in units of analysis used, meta-analysis was not possible (very low-certainty evidence). All studies reported cost savings or quality-adjusted life year improvement (or both) in the patient navigation arm. No studies reported on adverse events (specifically, abuse of any type against the navigator, the patient, or their family members)., Authors' Conclusions: There is insufficient evidence at present to support the use of patient navigator programmes for children and adolescents with chronic diseases. The current evidence is based on limited data with very low-certainty evidence. Further studies are likely to significantly change these results., (Copyright © 2024 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Objective: To describe how patients choose between primary care institutions (PCIs) and non-PCIs using rational choice theory from the perspective of survival rationality, economic rationality, and social rationality., Methods: Multi-stage stratified sampling and convenience sampling were applied to select 1723 patients to conduct the questionnaire survey. Chi-square test and binary logistic regression were performed to analyze the factors associated with patients' choice of PCIs., Results: In total 55.83% of 1723 patients would attend a PCIs for healthcare. The results of the univariate analysis revealed that patients who are female (58.46%, P = .015), suffering from chronic diseases (56.26%, P = .047), inpatients (67.58%, P < .001), Beijing (59.62%, P = .002), partial understanding of the family doctor contracting system (62.30%, P < .001), and not understanding of the medical alliance policy (58.04%, P = .031) had significantly higher probability of choosing PCIs. Logistic regression analysis showed that females were more unwilling to attend PCIs (odds ratio (OR) = 0.822, 95%CI: 0.676-0.999). Following survival rationality, patients without chronic diseases were more likely to attend PCIs (OR = 1.834, 95%CI: 1.029-3.268), and inpatients were more unlikely to attend PCIs (OR = 0.581, 95%CI: 0.437-0.774). From an economic rationality perspective, patients from the Fujian province were more likely to attend PCIs (OR = 1.424, 95%CI: 1.081-1.876). From a social rationality perspective, patients who partial understanding of the family doctor contracting system were more unlikely to attend PCIs (OR = 0.701, 95%CI: 0.551-0.892), and patients who partial and complete understanding of the medical alliance policy were more likely to attend PCIs (OR = 1.340, 95%CI: 1.064-1.687; OR = 1.485, 95%CI: 1.086-2.030)., Conclusions: Survival, economic, and social rationality are involved in patients' choice to attend PCIs. Compared to survival rationality and social rationality, economic rationality showed a lower association with patients' choice to attend PCIs. Medical institutions are recommended to adopt a "patient health-centered" approach when providing medical services and further optimize the family doctor contracting system and construction of medical alliances., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objective: There is limited evidence on how the physical health of children and young people (CYP) who are care experienced (eg, in foster or out-of-home care) compares to the general population. UK research suggests that the prevalence of some chronic conditions may be similar for these groups., Design: We undertook longitudinal population-wide data linkage of social care, prescription and hospitalisation records for care experienced and general population CYP born 1990-2004, followed from birth to August 2016. We compared prevalence estimates for asthma, diabetes (type 1) and epilepsy between the cohorts and used Poisson and survival models to estimate the association between social care and hospitalisations for these conditions., Results: Care experience was not associated with a higher prevalence of asthma and diabetes, but epilepsy was more prevalent. Care was associated with increased hospitalisation rates for all three conditions, particularly for males. HRs for hospitalisations were highest before and after care and lower while the child was in care, for diabetes these were, respectively 1.88 (95% CI 1.28 to 2.77), 2.40 (95% CI 1.55 to 3.71) and 1.31 (95% CI 0.91 to 1.88) for care experienced CYP compared with general population., Conclusions: Hospitalisations for chronic conditions are higher among care experienced CYP, particularly for males, and outside care episodes. Families with children with chronic conditions should be offered support to manage these conditions and help keep families together. Higher hospitalisations after care suggest that care leavers should be provided more support to help manage their health., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)

Previous research has outlined evident disparities in the prevalence of chronic conditions among African Americans compared to other groups, with low-income African American men disproportionately affected by almost every disorder. Self-management programs are useful tools for managing chronic disorders beyond the doctor's office. This monograph provides a detailed looking into the current state of the research on low-income African American men with chronic health conditions. An intersectional approach is used to provide a nuanced synthesis of relevant literature. The project outlines the need for programs designed to engage low-income African American men with skills, resources, and tools for managing chronic conditions. Authors argue that improvements to traditional self-management programs can be realized by emphasizing culture, including end-users in the creation of programs, and offering culturally tailored strategies to improve health. Thus, any targeted program must include culturally detailed information about nutrition, exercise, stress, mental health, and leveraging social support.

Introduction: The Chronic Care Model (CCM), the Expanded Chronic Care Model (ECCM) and the eHealth Enhanced Chronic Care Model (eCCM) focus on how healthcare teams and eHealth support can offer effective care and relevant solutions for patients facing chronic care conditions. However, they do not consider how patients can help these teams in their work, nor do they promote ways in which patients can help themselves. However, in the last decade, three different models have emerged that can complete our capacity to design and deliver integrated care for people with chronic diseases. In this article, we propose a revised version of the model that integrates the patient perspective and patients' experience-based knowledge. It integrates three different ways of engaging patients that complement the other patient engagement point of view: the experience of care and mediation in healthcare, therapeutic patient education and patient learning pathways, as well as patient-professional partnership., Methodology: For each of the three models, we conducted a review of the literature using CINAHL, Medline, OVID, EMBASE PsychINFO, Science Direct and government reports on patient engagement and partnership with their healthcare providers, to integrate the different components of these models into the ECCM and eCCM. The goal is to create a model that better takes into account the experiential knowledge of patients and citizens throughout its different dimensions., Results: We identified 129 papers based on their framework, design, sample, measures and fit with patient engagement and chronic illness and added our own research when relevant. Integrating the three models provides an opportunity to amplify the role played by the patient perspective in the management of chronic disease. The Expanded Chronic Care Patient-Professional Partnership Model (E2C3PM) is intended to rebalance power relations between healthcare professionals and patients (and their caregivers). This new model is based on recognizing patients' experiential knowledge and their roles as caregivers and as full members of the care team. Integrating patient empowerment into the E2C3PM underscores the importance of coproduction care with patients at the clinical, organizational and system levels within a supportive environment., Conclusion: Applying this new model should make it possible to better take into account the complexity of chronic diseases, improving the integration not only of care, services and eHealth support but also the various determinants of health and reaching a mutually beneficial settlement among all actors involved., Patient or Public Contribution: A patient-researcher contributed to the development of the protocol, the data collection and the preparation and writing of this manuscript., (© 2024 The Author(s). Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Navigating cancer care is complex and is exacerbated by pre-existing comorbidities managed by multiple providers. In this quality improvement study, we evaluated changes in perceived care coordination, navigation, and chronic illness care with community health worker (CHW) and mHealth support among Black breast cancer and prostate cancer patients with hypertension and/or diabetes. We collected patient and provider surveys on chronic illness care coordination at baseline and six months and found improvements in multiple domains. These findings support engaging CHWs to improve care coordination among cancer patients with comorbidities and demonstrate a use case of importance with emerging navigation reimbursement policies., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

This systematic review primarily aims to provide a summary of the game mechanics implemented in eHealth tools supporting young people's self-management of their chronic diseases. This review secondarily investigates the rationale for implementing game mechanics and the effects of these tools. A systematic search was conducted in Embase, Medline, PsycINFO, and Web of Science, from inception until August 30, 2022. Studies were eligible if focus was on the utilization of gamification in eHealth self-management interventions for young people (age = 10-25 years) with chronic diseases. Primary quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-method studies written in English were included. We identified 34 eHealth tools, of which 20 (59%) were gamified tools and 14 (41%) were serious games. We found that 55 unique game mechanics were implemented. The most commonly used were rewards (50%), score (44%), creative control (41%), and social interaction (32%). In comparison with gamified tools, the number and diversity of game mechanics applied were higher in serious games. For most tools (85%), a general rationale was provided for utilizing gamification, which often was to promote engaging experiences. A rationale for using specific game mechanics was less commonly provided (only for 45% of the game mechanics). The limited availability of experimental research precludes to test the effectiveness of using gamification in eHealth to support self-management in young people with chronic diseases. In this study, we highlight the importance of reporting the rationale for utilizing specific game mechanics in eHealth tools to ensure a proper alignment with evidence-based practice and the need of conducting experimental research. PROSPERO: CRD42021293037.

Background: Mobile health (mHealth) implementation is crucial for developing sustainable healthcare systems, but it faces the challenge of user acceptance. Extending traditional acceptance models allows for the cognitive, emotional and social aspects of engaging with mHealth to be captured, creating a more comprehensive understanding of users' intentions to use it in the future. User-centred intervention studies based on users' real experiences with mHealth are essential for accurate assessments and for improving upon studies that rely merely on anticipated mHealth use., Methods: An intervention study was conducted with 103 patients with at least one chronic condition (type 2 diabetes and/or arterial hypertension) who had used an mHealth service for three months. They were recruited through purposive sampling at a community health centre in Slovenia. Path analysis was applied to the survey data collected after a three-month testing period to validate an explanatory model with eight hypotheses., Results: The intensity of mHealth use affected usability, which in turn affected acceptability, the psychosocial impacts of engagement with mHealth and intention for future use. The results showed that the intensity of mHealth use did not affect mHealth acceptability. Likewise, acceptability did not affect the psychosocial impacts of engagement with mHealth or the intention for its future use. Notably, perceptions of the psychosocial impacts of mHealth had no significant effect on the intention for future use., Conclusion: Usability and intensity of use play a central role in the post-intervention usage of mHealth, offering valuable insights for policymakers and healthcare providers involved in the delivery of mHealth-based treatment to patients with chronic diseases., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Chronic health conditions (CHC; e.g., cystic fibrosis, type 1 diabetes) in children are associated with disease-specific physical symptoms that contribute to a high prevalence of sleep problems. Sleep problems exacerbate other health-related sequelae and can impede therapeutic response to health treatments, increasing the overall complexity of symptom management. Psychosocial sleep interventions (PSI) improve sleep in children with typical development and neurodevelopmental conditions. Yet, the effectiveness of PSI for children with CHC has scarcely been investigated. This systematic review appraises the literature examining the effectiveness and acceptability of PSI for children with CHC. A search identified 20 studies that met inclusion criteria. Data related to participant characteristics, sleep targets, research design and methods, measures, sleep outcomes and collateral effects were extracted. Study rigor was then evaluated. Most studies evaluated youth-directed Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia or parent-implemented behavioral sleep interventions. Twelve studies demonstrated positive sleep treatment effects and four demonstrated mixed effects. Collateral improvements were reported in child mental health and parental health and well-being, though physical health benefits for children were not consistently reported. One, five and 14 studies were rated as having strong, adequate, and weak methodological rigor respectively. Recommendations for clinical practice and future research are made., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Importance: Decades-old data indicate that people imprisoned in the US have poor access to health care despite their constitutional right to care. Most prisons impose co-payments for at least some medical visits. No recent national studies have assessed access to care or whether co-pays are associated with worse access., Objective: To determine the proportion of people who are incarcerated with health problems or pregnancy who used health services, changes in the prevalence of those conditions since 2004, and the association between their state's standard prison co-payment and care receipt in 2016., Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional analysis was conducted in October 2023 and used data from the Bureau of Justice Statistics' 2016 Survey of Prison Inmates, a nationally representative sample of adults in state or federal prisons, with some comparisons to the 2004 version of that survey., Exposures: The state's standard, per-visit co-payment amount in 2016 compared with weekly earnings at the prison's minimum wage., Main Outcomes and Measures: Self-reported prevalence of 13 chronic physical conditions, 6 mental health conditions, and current severe psychological distress assessed using the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale; proportion of respondents with such problems who did not receive any clinician visit or treatment; and adjusted odds ratios (aORs) comparing the likelihood of no clinician visit according to co-payment level., Results: Of 1 421 700 (unweighted: n = 24 848; mean [SD] age, 35.3 [0.3] years; 93.2% male individuals) prison residents in 2016, 61.7% (up from 55.9% in 2004) reported 1 or more chronic physical conditions; among them, 13.8% had received no medical visit since incarceration. A total of 40.1% of respondents reported ever having a mental health condition (up from 24.5% in 2004), of whom 33.0% had received no mental health treatment. A total of 13.3% of respondents met criteria for severe psychological distress, of whom 41.7% had not received mental health treatment in prison. Of state prison residents, 90.4% were in facilities requiring co-payments, including 63.3% in facilities with co-payments exceeding 1 week's prison wage. Co-payments, particularly when high, were associated with not receiving a needed health care visit (co-pay ≤1 week's wage: aOR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.10-1.86; co-pay >1 week's wage: aOR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.61-2.93)., Conclusions and Relevance: This cross-sectional study found that many people who are incarcerated with health problems received no care, particularly in facilities charging co-payments for medical visits.

Background: Given the growing population of older adults globally, e-Health plays an indispensable role in the chronic disease management of multimorbidity. However, qualitative evidence that synthesizes the experiences of older adults with multimorbidity using e-Health service is currently lacking. The objective was to explore the experiences and perceptions of e-Health care in community-based settings among the older adults with multimorbidity. Methods: Seven electronic databases including PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Chinese BioMedical Literature were searched, and the search was limited to studies from inception to September 1, 2023. Screening, data extraction, and quality appraisal were conducted independently by two reviewers. Thomas and Harden's thematic synthesis methodology was applied to synthesize the original themes. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research, and the confidence of synthesized themes was evaluated by the Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research approaches. Results: Ten studies with moderate methodological quality met eligibility criteria and were included finally. Studies were conducted in four countries with 235 participants who were living with multiple chronic conditions. Among the 10 included studies, 37 credible findings were extracted and interpreted into 3 synthesized themes and 12 subthemes: (1) advantages and benefits perceived during e-Health service, (2) multidimensional challenges and negative experience posed by e-Health service, and (3) preferences, suggestions, and expectations for future e-Health improvement. The confidence in the majority of the three final synthesized themes was rated between "low" and "moderate" scales. Conclusions: The findings of this study provide new insights into implementing tailored e-Health care for older adults with multimorbidity. Further research should emphasize on realizing the potential value of e-Health service based on users' needs and perspectives to promote age-friendliness in geriatric practice.

Background: Chronic diseases requiring long-term treatment, care, and follow-up can negatively affect the health and well-being of caregivers. Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) are increasingly used as a mental health intervention to control the psychological problems experienced by caregivers and improve their quality of life., Aims: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to provide evidence for a holistic evaluation and synthesis of the effects of MBIs applied to caregivers of adults with chronic disease on the burden, quality of life, and psychological distress., Methods: Studies evaluating the effects of mindfulness-based interventions on caregivers of adults with chronic diseases and published through September 2023 were searched using PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and EBSCO. Methodological quality was assessed with the modified JADAD scale, and bias was assessed with the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. Randomized controlled studies were included. The standardized mean difference with a 95% confidence interval was calculated. Heterogeneity was analyzed using the I 2 test and Q statistic. Publication bias was assessed with the Egger regression test., Results: This meta-analysis included 12 studies. Pooled evidence found that MBIs resulted in significant improvements in stress, anxiety, depression, and caregiver burden in caregivers of adults with chronic illness but had no significant effects on quality of life, resilience, and mindfulness. The Egger's test showed no evidence of publication bias., Linking Evidence to Action: MBIs can be considered as a helpful method to increase psychological well-being and reduce caregiver burden in caregivers of adults with chronic diseases. These findings may direct clinicians to conduct mindfulness-based interventions for caregivers of adults with chronic diseases., (© 2024 The Author(s). Worldviews on Evidence‐based Nursing published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Sigma Theta Tau International.)

Rationale: Healthcare systems remain disease oriented despite growing sustainability concerns caused by inadequate management of patients with multimorbidity. Comprehensive care programmes (CCPs) can play an important role in streamlining care delivery, but large differences in setup and results hinder firm conclusions on their effectiveness. Many elements for successful implementation of CCPs are identified, but strategies to overcome barriers and embed programmes within health systems remain unknown., Aims and Objectives: To address this knowledge gap through a detailed study of implementing a CCP in a Dutch hospital setting, including patient experiences, facilitators, barriers and ways to overcome those barriers. Additionally, this study aims to explore effects on patient satisfaction and healthcare use., Methods: A qualitative study design with 39 semistructured interviews and focus groups between July 2020 and February 2023 with 16 patients and 17 involved professionals. Additionally, effects on quantitative outcomes for patient satisfaction (PACIC-20) and healthcare use were explored., Results: Professionals expressed a wide range of topics related to implementation and ways to overcome barriers at hospital and system level. Alterations in the design to accommodate varying care demands, focus on inclusions through referrals, and lack of long-term support and appropriate financing were key topics. Patients expressed varying experiences, stated a strong desire for comprehensive information, and emphasised the importance of trust in caregivers. Patient satisfaction showed no effects, while healthcare use showed slight decreases in trends, but patient numbers were limited., Conclusion: The introduction of a CCP is feasible, and exploratory analysis on effectiveness shows lower hospital care use without decreasing patient satisfaction. However, this is accompanied by several challenges that show current fragmented systems still do not support implementation of integrated care initiatives. Overcoming those comes with substantial costs and may require a strong bottom-up implementation within a motivated team and actions on all levels of healthcare systems., (© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: People living with advanced, non-malignant chronic conditions often have extensive and complex care needs. Informal or family caregivers often provide the care and support needed by those with advanced chronic conditions at home. These informal caregivers experience many challenges associated with their caring role, which can impact their own wellbeing. Whilst there is growing evidence around the impact on carers, guidance on support for informal caregivers of patients with advanced, non-malignant, chronic conditions is lacking, with little evidence available on effective psychosocial carer interventions. This systematic review explored existing interventions for caregivers of those with advanced, non-malignant, chronic illness, in order to assess the effectiveness of these interventions in improving psychosocial outcomes., Methods: Electronic databases, Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE, and PsycINFO, were searched up to the end of March 2023. Studies meeting the inclusion criteria, focusing on interventions to improve psychosocial outcomes, such as depression, anxiety, quality of life, and caregiver burden, in this cohort of caregivers were included. Data were extracted regarding study setting, design, methods, intervention components, and outcomes. Risk of bias and quality assessment were conducted., Results: A total of 5281 articles were screened, ultimately identifying 12 studies for inclusion, reported in 13 publications. A narrative synthesis revealed mixed results. Psychosocial interventions resulted in more significant improvements in psychosocial outcomes than psychoeducational or support interventions, with interventions for carer-patient dyads also reflecting more positive outcomes for caregivers. Evidence-based interventions, guided by an appropriate theoretical model, were reportedly more effective in improving caregiver outcomes. Differences in outcomes were related to intervention development, design, delivery, and outcome assessment., Conclusions: This review, to our knowledge, is the first to explore the effectiveness of interventions in improving psychosocial outcomes for caregivers of those with advanced, non-malignant, chronic conditions. The review highlights the need for more robust, sufficiently powered, high-quality trials of evidence-based interventions for caregivers of people with advanced chronic illness. Optimal intervention duration and frequency of sessions are unclear and need further exploration., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Heart failure (HF) is a leading cause of hospitalizations in Haiti. However, few patients return for outpatient care. The factors contributing to chronic HF care access are poorly understood. Objective: The purpose of this study is to investigate the facilitators and barriers to accessing care for chronic HF from the patients' perspectives. Methods: We conducted a qualitative descriptive study of 13 patients with HF participating in three group interviews and one individual interview. We recruited patients after discharge from a nongovernmental organization-supported academic hospital in rural Haiti. We employed thematic analysis using emergent coding and categorized themes using the socioecological model. Findings: Facilitators of chronic care included participants' knowledge about the importance of treatment for HF and engagement with health systems to manage symptoms. Social support networks helped participants access clinics. Participants reported low cost of care at this subsidized hospital, good medication accessibility, and trust in the healthcare system. Participants expressedstrong spiritual beliefs, with the view that the healthcare system is an extension of God's influence. Barriers to chronic care included misconceptions about the importance of adherence to medications when symptoms improve and remembering follow-up appointments. Unexpectedly, participants believed they should take their HF medications with food and that food insecurity resulted in missed doses. Lack of social support networks limited clinic access. The nonhealthcare costs associated with clinic visits were prohibitive for many participants. Participants expressed low satisfaction regarding the clinic experience. A barrier to healthcare was the belief that heart disease caused by mystical and supernatural spirits is incurable. Conclusions: We identified several facilitators and barriers to chronic HF care with meaningful implications for HF management in rural Haiti. Future interventions to improve chronic HF care should emphasize addressing misconceptions about HF management and fostering patient support systems for visit and medication adherence. Leveraging local spiritual beliefs may also promote care engagement., Competing Interests: The authors have no competing interests to declare., (Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s).)

Background: The use of patient-facing health technologies to manage long-term conditions (LTCs) is increasing; however, children and young people (CYP) may have preferences about health technologies which they interact or engage with, that influence their decision to use these technologies., Aims: To identify CYP's reported preferences about health technologies to self-manage LTCs., Methods: We undertook a scoping review, searching MEDLINE, PsycINFO and CINAHL in July 2021. Searches were limited to papers published between January 2015 and July 2021. We included any health technologies used to manage physical and mental LTCs. Qualitative content analysis of study data was undertaken to categorise data into themes and quantitative data were described and visually represented. We engaged CYP with LTCs to support the review design, interpretation of findings and development of recommendations., Results: 161 journal articles were included, describing preferences of CYP. Most included studies were undertaken in high-income countries. CYP's main preferences and needs were: design and functionality; privacy and sharing; customisation and personalisation of the technology; and interaction options within the technology., Conclusions: This review highlights important preferences and needs that CYP may have before using technologies to self-manage their LTC. These should be considered when developing technology for this population. Future research should involve CYP throughout the development of the technologies, from identifying their unmet needs through to final design, development, evaluation and implementation of the intervention., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: There are numerous mobile health (mHealth) interventions for treatment adherence and self-management; yet, little is known about user engagement or interaction with these technologies., Objective: This systematic review aimed to answer the following questions: (1) How is user engagement defined and measured in studies of mHealth interventions to promote adherence to prescribed medical or health regimens or self-management among people living with a health condition? (2) To what degree are patients engaging with these mHealth interventions? (3) What is the association between user engagement with mHealth interventions and adherence or self-management outcomes? (4) How often is user engagement a research end point?, Methods: Scientific database (Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and CINAHL) search results (2016-2021) were screened for inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were extracted in a standardized electronic form. No risk-of-bias assessment was conducted because this review aimed to characterize user engagement measurement rather than certainty in primary study results. The results were synthesized descriptively and thematically., Results: A total of 292 studies were included for data extraction. The median number of participants per study was 77 (IQR 34-164). Most of the mHealth interventions were evaluated in nonrandomized studies (157/292, 53.8%), involved people with diabetes (51/292, 17.5%), targeted medication adherence (98/292, 33.6%), and comprised apps (220/292, 75.3%). The principal findings were as follows: (1) >60 unique terms were used to define user engagement; "use" (102/292, 34.9%) and "engagement" (94/292, 32.2%) were the most common; (2) a total of 11 distinct user engagement measurement approaches were identified; the use of objective user log-in data from an app or web portal (160/292, 54.8%) was the most common; (3) although engagement was inconsistently evaluated, most of the studies (99/195, 50.8%) reported >1 level of engagement due to the use of multiple measurement methods or analyses, decreased engagement across time (76/99, 77%), and results and conclusions suggesting that higher engagement was associated with positive adherence or self-management (60/103, 58.3%); and (4) user engagement was a research end point in only 19.2% (56/292) of the studies., Conclusions: The results revealed major limitations in the literature reviewed, including significant variability in how user engagement is defined, a tendency to rely on user log-in data over other measurements, and critical gaps in how user engagement is evaluated (infrequently evaluated over time or in relation to adherence or self-management outcomes and rarely considered a research end point). Recommendations are outlined in response to our findings with the goal of improving research rigor in this area., Trial Registration: PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42022289693; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display&#95;record.php?ID=CRD42022289693., (©Cyd Eaton, Natalie Vallejo, Xiomara McDonald, Jasmine Wu, Rosa Rodríguez, Nishanth Muthusamy, Nestoras Mathioudakis, Kristin A Riekert. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 24.09.2024.)

Background: The use of Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in chronic liver disease (CLD) patients in Germany is unknown. This study investigated the frequency of CAM use and associated sociodemographic, clinical and personality factors in CLD patients in Germany., Methods: This is a cross-sectional multicenter study of CLD patients attending liver outpatient clinics of university hospitals in Halle(-Saale) and Homburg between 2015 and 2017. Dedicated questionnaires recorded CAM use, sociodemographic and personality factors (evaluated with the "Big five" model, "Hospital Anxiety and Depression"-, "Multidimensional Health Locus of Control"- score). Uni- and multivariate analyses assessed factors associated to CAM use., Results: Overall 378 patients were recruited, 92 (24.3%) reported to CAM use. On univariate analysis, female CAM users were older (p = 0.001) and more physically active (p = 0.002), male CAM users more often used homeopathy (p = 0.000), actively promoted their health (p = 0.010) or had UDC in their medication (p = 0.004). Logistic regression analysis adjusted for personality factors showed significant association of age, physical exercise (females) and satisfaction with alternative medicine (females, males) to CAM use., Conclusions: CAM use is prevalent among CLD patients in Germany and is significantly associated to satisfaction with alternative medicine (females, males), physical exercise and older age (females). Doctors should actively inquire CLD patients about CAM use, as hepatotoxicity or interaction with medication can occur., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Optimising the management of chronicity has been a global challenge for decades. Individuals with long-term conditions (LTCs) and their families live with them for years. Thus, it is necessary to include both of their perspectives in the management and adaptation of the interventions proposed. The psychometric properties of the living with LTCs scale from the perspective of the family caregiver are unknown. The objective of the present study is to describe the psychometric properties of the EC-PC-Fam in a Spanish-speaking population., Methods: An observational, cross-sectional study was performed with a retest of part of the sample. The fit of the model was optimised with a factorial analysis, and the psychometric properties were verified., Results: A sample of 311 caregivers was recruited. Most of them were women (68.2%) and had a mean age of 58.29±9.91 years (range: 32-84 years). The initial version did not obtain acceptable fit scores. To improve the fit, different versions were tested, refining the distribution of the items until optimisation was reached in V.10 (19 items). Cronbach's alpha was 0.81 for the scale as a whole. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.77. The EC-PC-Fam scale is strongly and inversely correlated with a scale that measures the burden of the caregiver (r s =-0.46), and moderately related to the health-related quality of life (r s =0.373) and social support (r s =0.38)., Conclusions: The EC-PC-Fam scale from a family perspective is defined as a promising tool for promoting personalised care and for optimising the management of LTCs, and a new approach that includes family caregivers is proposed for clinical practice. The scale is an instrument with a moderate fit and optimum psychometric properties to measure living with LTCs from the perspective of a family caregiver. New validation studies are recommended to verify the fit of the proposed factorial solution., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROMs) are standardized digital instruments integrated into clinical care to collect subjective data regarding patients' health-related quality of life, functional status, and symptoms. In documenting patient-reported progress, ePROMs can guide treatment decisions and encourage measurement-based care practices. Voxe is a pediatric and user-centered ePROM platform for patients with chronic health conditions., Objective: We aimed to describe the user-centered design approach involving feedback from end users and usability testing of Voxe's platform features to support implementation in a pediatric health care setting., Methods: Purposive sampling was used to recruit patients aged 8-17 years from 2 chronic illness populations in 2 pediatric hospitals in Canada. Patients' health care team members were also purposively recruited. One-on-one iterative testing sessions were conducted digitally by research team members with participants to obtain feedback on the appearance and functionalities of the Voxe platform prototype. Patients and health care providers (HCPs) completed Voxe-related task-based activities. International Organization for Standardization key performance indicators were tracked during HCP task-based activities. HCPs also completed the System Usability Scale. To test platform usability, the think-aloud technique was used by participants during the completion of structured tasks. After completing all task-based activities, patient participants selected 5 words from the Microsoft Desirability Toolkit to describe their overall impression and experience with the Voxe platform. Qualitative data about likes, dislikes, and ease of use were collected through semistructured interviews. Feedback testing sessions were conducted with patients and HCPs until Voxe was acceptable to participating end users, with no further refinements identified. Quantitative and qualitative data analysis were completed using descriptive statistics and content analysis., Results: A total of 49 patients and 38 HCPs were recruited. Patients were positive about Voxe's child-centered design characteristics and notification settings. HCPs rated Voxe as user-friendly and efficient, with the time to complete tasks decreasing over time. HCPs were satisfied with the Voxe platform functionalities and identified the value of Voxe's system notifications, summarized display of ePROM results, and its capacity to integrate with electronic medical records. Patients' and HCPs' high satisfaction rates with the Voxe prototype highlight the importance of being responsive to user suggestions from the inception of eHealth platform developments to ensure their efficient and effective design., Conclusions: This paper describes the user-centered creation and usability testing of Voxe as an ePROM platform for implementation into clinical care for pediatric patients with chronic health conditions. As a patient-facing platform that can be integrated into electronic medical records, Voxe aligns with measurement-based care practices to foster quality patient-centered approaches to care. End users' positive feedback and evaluation of the platform's user-friendliness and efficiency suggest that Voxe represents a valuable and promising solution to systematically integrate patient-related outcome (PRO) data into complex and dynamic clinical health care settings., International Registered Report Identifier (irrid): RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053119., (©Samantha J Anthony, Sarah J Pol, Enid K Selkirk, Amarens Matthiesen, Robert J Klaassen, Dorin Manase, Amanda Silva, Melanie Barwick, Jennifer N Stinson, Alameen Damer, Mowa Ayibiowu, Selina X Dong, Stephan Oreskovich, Michael Brudno. Originally published in JMIR Human Factors (https://humanfactors.jmir.org), 19.09.2024.)

Objectives: The objective of this study was to compare and contrast the experiences of interdisciplinary attendees (spokes) and experts (hub members) from three Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) programmes: hepatitis C, chronic pain and concurrent mental health and substance use disorders., Design: Prospective qualitative study., Setting: Single-centre in tertiary care., Participants: The team conducted 30 one-on-one interviews with spokes and 4 focus groups with hub members from three ECHO programmes., Analyses: Three analysts were involved to perform a reflexive thematic analysis., Results: Our results showed the benefits and limitations of the three ECHOs, varying according to specificities of targeted chronic conditions. Three overarching themes were identified from the data analysis: (1) perceived impacts of an interprofessional educational setting; (2) nature of disease and interprofessional interactions as determinants of clinical practice changes in diagnoses and treatments and (3) impacts on patient engagement and care pathways., Conclusions: The extent to which a chronic disease relies on a biopsychosocial approach, the degree of interdisciplinary care required and the simplicity/complexity of treatment algorithms influence perceived benefits and barriers to participating in ECHO programmes. These points raised by our study are important in the understanding of the successes and limitations of implementing an ECHO programme. They are essential as they provide key information for tailoring Project ECHO to the chronic disease it addresses., Competing Interests: Competing interests: GP received honoraria from Canopy Growth and research grant from Pfizer Canada for work unrelated to the present study. AT has a family member working for ViiV USA, a pharmaceutical company. Other members have no competing interest to declare., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)