Search

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) represents an innovative approach to treat or prevent peritoneal metastasis. However, given the morbidity that can be associated with this procedure, adequate patient selection facilitated by scoring systems for primary peritoneal surface malignancy (PSM) is paramount to ensure equitable morbidity as well as acceptable survival outcome.Seminal studies on scoring systems for PSM that have laid the foundation for adequate patient selection and prognostication are spotlighted.Quantitative prognostic indicators have been defined for patients with PSM that enable the surgeon to make sound clinical judgements as to who may or may not benefit from CRS/HIPEC. These prognostic indicators include the histopathology of the tumor, findings on the preoperative abdominal and pelvic computerized axial tomography, the Peritoneal Cancer Index, completeness of cytoreduction score, and prior surgical score.Scoring systems for primary peritoneal surface malignancy reviewed in this article highlight the utility of these systems for patient selection for CRS/HIPEC and prognostication.

Supplementary Data figures and tables Fig. S1. Genomic characterization of CR cells. Fig. S2. Karyotype analysis of CR cells. Fig. S3. Drug sensitivity profiles of CR cells. Fig. S4. Population doubling times of Parental and nab-paclitaxel resistant cells. Fig. S5. Nab-paclitaxel sensitivity of CR spheroids. Fig. S6. Dependency of CR cells on KRAS. Fig. S7. CR-based PDX tumors in mice. Fig. S8. Reverse Phase Proteomic analysis of Parental and nab-paclitaxel resistant cells. Fig. S9. Modulation of c-Myc and the effects on nab-paclitaxel sensitivity. Fig. S10. SMAP2 Responses. Table S1. Patient data Table S2. Gene mutations associated with nab-paclitaxel resistance

The Chicago Consensus Working Group provides multidisciplinary recommendations for the management of desmoplastic small round cell tumor, breast, and gastrointestinal stromal tumor specifically related to peritoneal surface malignancy. These guidelines are developed with input from leading experts including surgical oncologists, medical oncologists, pathologists, radiologists, palliative care physicians, and pharmacists. These guidelines recognize and address the emerging need for increased awareness in the appropriate management of peritoneal surface disease. They are not intended to replace the quest for higher levels of evidence.

The Chicago Consensus Working Group provides multidisciplinary recommendations for palliative care specifically related to peritoneal surface malignancies. These guidelines are developed with input from leading experts including surgical oncologists, medical oncologists, gynecologic oncologists, pathologists, radiologists, palliative care physicians, and pharmacists. These guidelines recognize and address the emerging need for increased awareness in the appropriate management of peritoneal surface disease. They are not intended to replace the quest for higher levels of evidence.

The Chicago Consensus Working Group provides multidisciplinary recommendations for the management of neuroendocrine tumors specifically related to the management of peritoneal surface malignancy. These guidelines are developed with input from leading experts, including surgical oncologists, medical oncologists, pathologists, radiologists, palliative care physicians, and pharmacists. These guidelines recognize and address the emerging need for increased awareness in the appropriate management of peritoneal surface disease. They are not intended to replace the quest for higher levels of evidence.

Highlights • Progression of peritoneal metastases to cause bowel obstruction may occur in the absence of systemic cancer spread. • Bowel obstruction has a profound effect on the quality of life of these patients prior to their demise. • Drainage of gastrointestinal secretions has been shown to add palliative benefit to the management of these patients. • Total parenteral nutrition can assist in improving the quality of life of these patients. • In selected patients the optimal method for gastrointestinal decompression is a cervical esophagostomy tube., Background Patients with gastrointestinal or gynecologic malignancy may show disease progression within the abdomen and pelvis causing bowel obstruction in the absence of clinical evidence of disease outside of the peritoneal space. Bowel obstruction eventually results and has a profound effect on quality of life eventually leading to the demise of these patients. Methods In order to improve the quality of life and combat the requirement for a nasogastric tube, a combination of total parenteral nutrition (TPN) to allow adequate caloric intake plus cervical esophagostomy to drain intestinal secretions was utilized as a palliative treatment long-term for patients with malignancy-associated bowel obstruction. Results In 2 patients with appendiceal malignancy no cancer spread outside of the peritoneal space occurred. Unfortunately, total obstruction of the bowel caused unremitting nausea, vomiting, and pain accompanied by an inability to take adequate nutrition by mouth. In these 2 patients TPN long-term was initiated and a cervical esophagostomy tube placed percutaneously. Relief of malnutrition and the symptoms of nausea and vomiting were well treated using this combined approach. Pain management continued as an ongoing problem. Conclusions Long-term management of malignancy-associated bowel obstruction is possible with improvement in quality of life using a combination of TPN and a cervical esophagostomy tube. In these two cases the cervical esophagostomy tube was placed with limited adverse events, and adequate drainage of intestinal secretions long-term.

The inability to propagate human prostate epithelial cells indefinitely has historically presented a serious impediment to prostate cancer research. The conditionally reprogrammed cell (CRC) approach uses the combination of irradiated J2 mouse fibroblasts and a Rho kinase inhibitor such as Y27632 to support the continuous culture of cells derived from most epithelial tissues, including the prostate. Due to their rapid establishment and overall ease of use, CRCs are now widely used in a variety of basic and preclinical settings. In addition, CRCs were successfully used to clinically treat respiratory papillomatosis. Although both normal and tumor-derived prostate CRCs have been used to study the basic biology of prostate cancer and to test new therapies, certain limitations exist. We have previously reported that prostate CRCs form functional prostate glands when implanted under the mouse renal capsule. However in conventional culture, the prostate CRCs exist in an adult stem-like, transient amplifying state and consequently do not adequately recapitulate several important features of a differentiated prostate epithelium. To address these limitations, we previously described a transwell dish-based model that supported the culturing of prostate CRCs and the collection of cells and cell extracts for molecular and genetic analyses. Using normal and tumor-derived prostate CRCs, we describe the combined effects of the multi-dimensional transwell platform and defined culture media on prostate cellular proliferation, differentiation and signaling.

Aim: To analyze the clinicopathologic and prognostic significance of Leucine-rich repeat-containing G-protein-coupled receptor 5 (LGR5), a cancer stem cell marker expression in a cohort of colorectal cancer patients (CRC). Patients & methods: A total of 76 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue blocks of primary or metastatic tumors from 49 CRC patients were collected for duration 2009–2015. LGR5 expression was assessed through immunohistochemical staining of a tissue microarray. Results: LGR5 was significantly over expressed in CRC tissue samples and found to be a statistically significant independent prognostic marker for an improved overall survival. Conclusion: LGR5 expression was higher in colorectal cancer than in normal tissue. LGR5 was an independent prognostic marker for better clinical outcomes and might be used as a potential therapeutic target in CRCs.

The Chicago Consensus Working Group provides multidisciplinary recommendations for the management of peritoneal mesothelioma. These guidelines are developed with input from leading experts, including surgical oncologists, medical oncologists, pathologists, radiologists, palliative care physicians, and pharmacists. These guidelines recognize and address the emerging need for increased awareness of the appropriate management of peritoneal surface disease. They are not intended to replace the quest for higher levels of evidence.

The Chicago Consensus Working Group provides the following multidisciplinary recommendations for the care of patients with peritoneal surface malignancies. This article focuses on the standards of a peritoneal surface malignancy center, standards of billing and coding, standards of operative reports for cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, standards of cytoreductive surgery training, and standards of intraoperative chemotherapy preparation. These guidelines are developed with input from leading experts, including surgical oncologists, medical oncologists, pathologists, radiologists, palliative care physicians, and pharmacists. These guidelines recognize and address the emerging need for increased awareness in the appropriate management of peritoneal surface disease. They are not intended to replace the quest for higher levels of evidence.

The Chicago Consensus Working Group provides multidisciplinary recommendations for the management of ovarian neoplasms specifically related to the management of peritoneal surface malignancy. These guidelines are developed with input from leading experts, including surgical oncologists, medical oncologists, gynecologic oncologists, pathologists, radiologists, palliative care physicians, and pharmacists. These guidelines recognize and address the emerging need for increased awareness in the appropriate management of peritoneal surface disease. They are not intended to replace the quest for higher levels of evidence.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly aggressive disease with limited and, very often, ineffective medical and surgical therapeutic options. The treatment of patients with advanced unresectable PDAC is restricted to systemic chemotherapy, a therapeutic intervention to which most eventually develop resistance. Recently, nab-paclitaxel (n-PTX) has been added to the arsenal of first-line therapies, and the combination of gemcitabine and n-PTX has modestly prolonged median overall survival. However, patients almost invariably succumb to the disease, and little is known about the mechanisms underlying n-PTX resistance. Using the conditionally reprogrammed (CR) cell approach, we established and verified continuously growing cell cultures from treatment-naïve patients with PDAC. To study the mechanisms of primary drug resistance, nab-paclitaxel–resistant (n-PTX-R) cells were generated from primary cultures and drug resistance was verified in vivo, both in zebrafish and in athymic nude mouse xenograft models. Molecular analyses identified the sustained induction of c-MYC in the n-PTX-R cells. Depletion of c-MYC restored n-PTX sensitivity, as did treatment with either the MEK inhibitor, trametinib, or a small-molecule activator of protein phosphatase 2a. Implications: The strategies we have devised, including the patient-derived primary cells and the unique, drug-resistant isogenic cells, are rapid and easily applied in vitro and in vivo platforms to better understand the mechanisms of drug resistance and for defining effective therapeutic options on a patient by patient basis.

Tumor-associated systemic inflammatory response has been correlated with prognosis. Our aim was to analyze the utility of inflammation-based prognostic scores for prognostication and patient selection for cytoreduction and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (POIC) in patients diagnosed with peritoneal metastasis of colonic origin.A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database for all patients treated for peritoneal metastasis of colonic origin from February 2001 to April 2015. Inflammation-based prognostic scores including neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and Onodera's prognostic nutritional index (ONI) were calculated.Of 123 patients, 70 (56.9%) were men and 53 (43.1%) were women. Mean age at diagnosis was 49.9 years. Significant prognosticators in univariate analysis included intraoperative peritoneal cancer index (p 0.000), tumor marker CA19-9 (p 0.000), PLR (p = 0.020), POIC regimen (p 0.003), and completeness of cytoreduction (p 0.000). Multivariate Cox analysis identified CA19-9 (hazard ratio [HR] 1.0; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00-1.01, p = 0.031), ONI (HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.79-0.94, p 0.000), PLR (HR 1.0; 95% CI 0.90-1.01, p = 0.041), incompleteness of cytoreduction CC2 and CC3, and mucinous adenocarcinoma histology as significant independent prognosticators.The inflammation-based prognostic scores PLR and ONI and tumor marker CA19-9 are significant prognosticators of survival. They are useful in patient selection and prognostication for cytoreductive surgery and POIC in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colonic origin.

Peritoneal metastasis of colonic origin is associated with a poor prognosis. This study aimed to analyze the clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic predictors of survival in a cohort of patients treated with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (POIC) during two decades. A retrospective study analyzed a prospectively maintained database for all patients treated for peritoneal metastasis of a colonic origin (PCC) from January 1990 to April 2015. The 318 patients in our study comprised 171 men (53.8%) and 147 women (46.2%). The mean age of the patients at presentation was 50.6 years, (range 18–86 years). Overall survival was 42.5%, median survival and follow-up time was 21.5 and 15.0 months respectively. The 3 and 5 years survival rates were respectively 35 and 25%. The median survival time was 20.6 months for the men and 23.1 months for the women (p = 0.14). The mean intraoperative peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) was 15.2. The patients who had a completeness of cytoreduction (CC) score of 0 or 1 (no residual disease

Appendiceal cancer most commonly metastasizes to the peritoneum. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is the standard of care for appendiceal cancer with peritoneal metastases. Adverse events postoperatively have been associated with reduced survival. We analyzed clinical outcomes, including complications after CRS and HIPEC in patients with appendiceal cancer, in a recent cohort of patients to identify prognostic factors. Patients undergoing CRS with HIPEC for appendix cancer with peritoneal metastases between January 2007 and December 2009 were identified. Prospectively collected data were analyzed, including preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables, and multivariate Cox regression models were developed to identify factors independently predicting overall survival (OS). A total of 133 consecutive patients with a median age of 51 years were analyzed; 53.4 % were female. Pre-, intra-, and postoperative clinical variables analyzed for their impact on survival included sex, age, prior surgical score, Peritoneal Cancer Index, completeness of cytoreduction score, histology, lymph node metastases, operative time, blood transfusion, fresh frozen plasma transfusion, perioperative chemotherapy, postoperative complications, length of hospitalization, and disease recurrence. OS at 5 years was 74.4 %, and 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) of patients with a complete cytoreduction (CC ≤ 1) was 65.5 %. Factors independently predicting shorter survival included peritoneal mucinous adenocarcinoma (PMCA) histology (hazard ratio [HR] 15.2, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 3.38–69.0), lymph node metastasis (HR 3.82, 95 % CI 1.13–12.8), and incomplete cytoreduction [CC3; HR 13.7, 95 % CI 3.18–59.1). An incomplete cytoreduction was associated with the PMCA variant (p

Background The Institute of Medicine has recently prioritized access of quality cancer care to vulnerable persons including multimorbid patients. Despite promotional efforts to regionalize major surgical procedures to high-volume hospitals (HVHs), little is known about change in access to HVH over time among multimorbid patients in need of major cancer surgery. We performed a time-trend appraisal of access of multimorbid persons to HVH for major cancer surgery within a large nationally representative cohort. Methods We identified 168,934 patients who underwent 6 major cancer surgeries from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (1998 to 2010). Comorbidities were identified using Elixhauser's method. HVHs were defined as hospitals of highest procedure volumes that treated 1/3 of all the patients. Logistic regression models and predictive margins were used to assess the adjusted effects of comorbidity on receiving major cancer surgeries at HVH. Results Of all, 45.7% of the patients had 2 comorbidities or more. Multimorbidity predicted decreased access to HVH for esophagectomy, total gastrectomy, pancreatectomy, hepatectomy, and proctectomy, but not for distal gastrectomy, after controlling for covariates. A comorbidity level by year interaction analysis also showed that little disparity existed for receiving distal gastrectomy at an HVH, whereas the predicted difference in probability of receiving any of the other 5 major cancer procedures remained prominent between the years 1998 and 2010. Conclusions In this large 12-year time-trend study, multimorbid cancer patients have sustained low access to HVH for major cancer surgery across many oncologic resections. These results continue to reinforce and highlight the need for policy targeted research and intervention aimed at improving these access gaps.

Tumors that show a signet ring or adenocarcinoid histomorphology have been associated with a poor prognosis. This study aimed to analyze the clinicopathologic and prognostic features in patients with peritoneal metastasis from mucinous adenocarcinoma (PMCA), adenocarcinoma with signet ring cell (PMCA-S), or adenocarcinoid (PMCA-A) of the appendix treated with cytoreductive surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database for all patients treated for appendiceal adenocarcinoma from 1989 to 2012 was performed. The study cohort consisted of 494 patients including 361 patients with PMCA (73.1 %), 80 patients with PMCA-S (16.2 %), and 53 patients with PMCA-A (10.7 %). The patients comprised 273 men (55.3 %) and 221 women (44.7 %) with a mean age at presentation of 50.7 years for the PMCA-S patients, 47.3 years for the PMCA patients, and 47.5 years for the PMCA-A patients (p

BACKGROUND The prior surgical score estimates the extent of previous surgical intervention by quantitating surgical dissection within 9 abdominopelvic regions. OBJECTIVE Our aim was to analyze the prognostic significance of the prior surgical score in our cohort of patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal carcinomatosis of a colorectal origin. DESIGN This was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database for all patients treated for peritoneal carcinomatosis of a colorectal origin. SETTINGS The prospectively maintained surgical oncology tumor database was analyzed for the study period 1989-2014. PATIENTS A total of 407 patients diagnosed with peritoneal carcinomatosis of a colorectal origin and treated with cytoreductive surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy were included in this analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The prognostic significance and clinicopathologic factors associated with an initial nondefinitive surgical intervention in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of a colorectal origin undergoing cytoreductive surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy was evaluated. RESULTS There were 210 men (51.6%) and 197 women (48.4%) in the study. Mean age at presentation was 53.7 years (range, 19.0-87.0 y). Data on prior surgical score for 69 patients were missing, leaving us with a study cohort of 338 patients. Grouped by prior surgical score, 46 (13.6%) had a prior surgical score of 0 versus 25 (7.4%), 122 (36.1%), and 145 (42.9%) who had a prior surgical score of 1, 2, or 3. Overall survival was 53.0%. Three- and 5-year survival rates were 75% and 75% for group prior surgical score 0 versus 26% and 13%, 39% and 37%, and 21% and 16% for group prior surgical scores 1, 2, and 3. Median survival time for the various prior surgical score groups were 180.0, 30.4, 30.5, and 21.3 months for prior surgical scores 0, 1, 2, and 3 (p = 0.000). A total of 87.2% of the prior surgical score 0 group had a completeness of cytoreduction score of 0/1 (no residual disease/tumor

Background Cytoreductive surgery (CRS)/Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) is associated with prolonged survival in selected patients with peritoneal surface disease. Yet, for elderly patients (older than 70 years of age) CRS/HIPEC is controversial, due to associated morbidity.

Perioperative chemotherapy has been shown to improve disease-free survival compared with surgery alone for resectable colorectal liver metastases (CLM). We examined our experience with systemic chemotherapy in this clinical setting. A prospectively collected liver surgery database identified 210 patients treated for resectable CLM from 1996 to 2010. Results were correlated to four treatment groups: posthepatectomy adjuvant only, prehepatectomy preoperative only, peri-operative (preoperative and adjuvant), and surgery only. Seventy-nine (37.6%) patients received posthepatectomy adjuvant only treatment, 33 (15.7%) received prehepatectomy preoperative only treatment, 46 (21.9%) received perioperative (preoperative and adjuvant) treatment, whereas 52 (24.8%) received surgery alone. Preoperative and adjuvant systemic chemotherapy regimens were as follows: 23 (29.1%) and 18 (14.4%) received a 5-fluorouracil monotherapy regimen, 19 (24.1%) and 31 (24.8%) received an irinotecan-based regimen, and 28 (35.4%) and 37 (29.6%) received an oxaliplatin-based regimen. Nine (11.4%) and 12 (9.6%) received some other unknown combination. Treatment groups showed no difference in gender, mean tumor size, number of tumors, margin status, or postoperative complications with the only difference being a higher incidence of metachronous tumors in the preoperative only and perioperative groups (P = 0.01). Median follow-up and overall survival were 25 and 41 months, respectively. The adjuvant, preoperative, perioperative, and surgery only groups had a median survival time of 48, 35, 39, and 29 months, respectively (log-rank P = 0.04). Independent predictors of overall survival on multivariate analysis included treatment algorithm used and postoperative complication status. Adjuvant only systemic therapy was associated with an improved survival in resectable CLM. Prospective randomized trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Our aim was to develop a prognostic model for predicting overall survival following cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in patients with appendiceal adenocarcinoma and peritoneal metastasis. A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database for all patients treated for appendiceal adenocarcinoma with peritoneal metastasis from 1989 to 2012 was conducted. Overall, 734 (50.7%) males and 715 (49.3%) females, with a mean age at presentation of 48.6 years, were included. Prognostic variables identified in a univariate Cox analysis included sex, tumor recurrence, tumor histology, Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index, age at diagnosis, lesion size, completeness of cytoreduction (CC) score, distant metastasis, lymph node status, and use of HIPEC. A multivariate Cox analysis identified distant metastasis, CC score, tumor histology, HIPEC use, and sex as independently predictive of survival. A prognostic index was derived and four risk groups were categorized (≤1, 2–4, 5–10, and ≥10). Median survival for the four risk groups differed significantly: 240 months for patients with a prognostic score ≤1 versus 235, 78.4, and 19.4 months for the cohort of patients with a prognostic score of 2–4, 5–10 and ≥10, respectively (p = 0.000). An internal validation of our prognostic model was carried out on a series of 379 randomly selected patients from our data, which provided corresponding estimates. Our prognostic model demonstrated a significant difference in overall survival for patients stratified by our derived prognostic scores. External validation of this model in other cohorts of patients is needed.

The management of peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer is evolving. The introduction of new chemotherapeutic and biologic agents has certainly improved the outlook for many patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Traditionally, patients with limited hepatic or pulmonary metastases were the only candidates for metastasectomy. However, patients with metastasis localized to the peritoneum have been shown to be candidates for metastasectomy with improved clinical outcomes. Cytoreductive surgery with the addition of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in this cohort of patients offers the only chance for long-term survival. Complete cytoreduction in combination with HIPEC for peritoneal surface disease has been demonstrated to produce survival outcomes similar to liver resection for hepatic metastases. This review will examine recent evidence pertaining to the evolving surgical oncology paradigm for management of colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis.

A new and frequently utilized treatment option for symptomatic uterine leiomyoma is laparoscopic resection with morcellation so the specimen can be extracted through a small abdominal incision or through the vagina. Some of these tumors (approximately 0.2 %) have malignant foci of uterine leiomyosarcoma (ULMS) that is widely disseminated in the process of resection. These patients are in need of effective additional treatments. Patients with ULMS were treated with a standardized cytoreductive surgery (CRS), hyperthermic perioperative chemotherapy (HIPEC), and early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC) specifically designed for sarcomatosis. Distribution of disease by Peritoneal Cancer Index was recorded by preoperative computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging and at the time of CRS. Completeness of cytoreduction score was determined after completion of CRS. Morbidity and mortality, as well as interval to start systemic chemotherapy, were prospectively recorded. Six patients with disseminated ULMS after morcellation or slicing underwent CRS and HIPEC plus EPIC. All six patients had complete visible clearing of sarcoma prior to perioperative chemotherapy. Early intervention after morcellation was associated with a lesser extent of disease. No serious morbidity or mortality was observed in early referral patients, and patients eligible for systemic chemotherapy were treated with perioperative chemotherapy within 6 weeks of the CRS. The future use of laparoscopic resection of ULMS with morcellation is currently under debate. However, patients after laparoscopic resection and morcellation have CRS and HIPEC plus EPIC as a treatment option. Results regarding short-term benefit are suggested by these early data, especially with early referral.

Background. Diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM) is an aggressive disease for which cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) have been used with remarkable survival benefits. Our aim was to analyze the clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of recurrent DMPM managed with iterative CRS and HIPEC. Methods. A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database for all patients treated for DMPM from 1989 to 2012. Results. Of 205 consecutive CRS and HIPEC procedures, 44 (21.5 %) patients underwent an iterative procedure—22 (50.0 %) males versus 22 (50.0 %) females. Mean age at recurrence was 51.5 years. There was no 30-day mortality following an iterative procedure, and the grade III–V morbidity was 2.3 %. The median overall survival of patients undergoing an iterative CRS and HIPEC was 54 months versus 77 months following an initial CRS and HIPEC (p = 0.96). Patients undergoing an iterative surgery had a 3- and 5-year survival of 61 and 46 %, respectively, versus 60 and 52 % following an initial CRS and HIPEC. Amongst the iterative group, the achieved complete cytoreduction (CC) score was 15.9, 18.2, 22.7, and 43.2 % for CC0, CC1, CC2 and CC3, respectively, versus 3.1, 43.5, 28.6 and 24.8 %, respectively, following initial CRS (p = 0.000). Significant predictors of an improved survival in multivariate analysis were an epithelioid subtype, female sex, complete or near CC (CC0 or CC1), HIPEC regimen utilized, absence of postoperative complication, and age at diagnosis. Conclusion. Iterative CRS and HIPEC can be performed safely and appear to have benefits with this group of patients showing an improved median survival.

Cytoreductive surgery (CS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is the treatment most likely to achieve prolonged survival in peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). Yet the efficacy of HIPEC in rectal patients is controversial because of the retroperitoneal location of the primary tumor. Therefore, we reviewed our experience in patients with PC from a rectal primary tumor.A retrospective analysis of a prospective database of 950 HIPEC procedures was performed. Performance status, age, albumin level, prior surgical score, resection status, morbidity, mortality, and survival were reviewed.A total of 13 and 204 patients with PC from rectal and colon cancer, respectively, were identified. Median follow-up was 40.1 and 88.1 months, respectively. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score was zero or one for 92 % of patients with rectal cancer and 83 % for colon, while R1 resection was achieved in 54 and 51 %. The 30-day mortality was 5 % for colon cancer. There were no deaths in the rectal group. The morbidity for the colon and rectal groups was 57 and 46 %, respectively, with a 23 % 30-day readmission rate. In univariate analysis, age, ECOG, prior surgical score, albumin level, and node and resection status were not statistically significant in predicting survival for the rectal cancer patients. Median survival for the rectal and colon groups was 14.6 versus 17.3 months, while the 3-year survival was 28.2 versus 25.1 %.Our data demonstrate similar 3-year survival for patients with rectal and colon cancer PC treated with CS/HIPEC. This can be attributed to patient selection bias. Selected rectal cancer PC patients should not be excluded from an attempted cytoreduction and HIPEC.

Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CS+HIPEC) is associated with significant perioperative morbidity. One goal of our ongoing patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQoL) program is to describe the prognostic value of HRQoL measures for predicting postoperative morbidity and mortality following CS+HIPEC.A retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected clinical database for all patients treated for peritoneal carcinomatosis and who participated in our patient-reported HRQoL program from 2001 to 2011 was done. Patients completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy questionnaire plus the colon symptom subscale, in addition to the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status rating prior to CS+HIPEC. The trial outcome index (TOI), a specific measure of function, symptoms, and physical well being of the patient, was analyzed. The TOI is a combination of the physical and functional well being subscales + the colon-specific subscale of the FACT-C.Of 855 patients, 387 (45.2 %) participated in the HRQoL trials. Mean age was 53.3 years, and 213 (55 %) were female versus 174 (45 %) males. There were 240 patients (62 %) who had a complication versus 147 (38 %) who had no complication. A 30-day mortality rate of 7.7 % (30) was documented. Patients who suffered a 30-day postoperative mortality demonstrated a lower mean preoperative score in the FACT-C TOI 52.7 versus 61.7; P 0.001. Independent predictors of 30-day mortality on multivariate analysis included TOI (0.05), age (0.001), and smoking (0.001). Patients with a higher TOI score were less likely to suffer a mortality (95 % CI 0.9-1.0, P = 0.05). Patients with a higher emotional well being (EWB) score were less likely to suffer a complication 0.9 (95 % CI 0.87-1.0, P = 0.04). Other independent predictors of postoperative morbidity included diabetic status (P = 0.05), ECOG performance status (0.001), and gender (0.02).Preoperative HRQoL, as measured by FACT-C and ECOG performance status and added to traditional factors, helps predict postoperative morbidity and mortality following CS+HIPEC.

Background Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has improved the survival of patients with peritoneal surface malignancy. On recurrence, a repeat CRS/HIPEC is a treatment option. Study Design A retrospective analysis of 868 CRS/HIPEC procedures was performed. Type of primary, functional status, completion of resection, hospitalization, morbidity, mortality, and survival were reviewed. Results Sixty-two patients (7.7%) underwent a second CRS/HIPEC, including 33 patients with appendiceal primaries, 8 ovarian, 7 mesotheliomas, 4 colon cancers, and 10 various malignancies. Median follow-up was 60.8 months. Median overall survival in months was 85.3 for appendiceal cancer, 52.9 for mesothelioma, 60.1 for ovarian, and 137.4 for colon cancer. R1 resection was achieved in 43.5% after both procedures. Median survival after the second cytoreduction was 52.1 months for appendiceal cancer, 21.8 for mesothelioma, 53.9 for ovarian, and 55.7 for colon cancer. Median survival was 55.7 months for R1 resection, 20.3 months for R2a resection, and 15.5 months for R2b−R2c. Median ICU and hospital stay was 1 and 7.5 days, respectively. The 30-day morbidity after the second CRS/HIPEC was 48.4% and mortality was 3.2%. In multivariate analysis, the R status of the second CRS/HIPEC (p = 0.013) and the interval between the 2 procedures (p = 0.009) were significant in predicting improved survival. Conclusions In experienced tertiary centers and for selected patients, a repeat CRS/HIPEC procedure has morbidity and mortality similar to the initial cytoreduction. Survival depends primarily on the completion of the repeat cytoreduction and favorable biology of the tumor.

Background Although peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) from colorectal and appendiceal tumors is consistent with metastatic disease, complete cytoreduction with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) using mitomycin C (MMC) can improve survival. A recent phase I study by our group using hyperthermic intraperitoneal oxaliplatin has demonstrated its safety and appropriate dose. Our goal in this study is to present a single institution’s experience with the hematologic toxicities of the two agents. Methods We performed a retrospective review of 187 patients with PC of colorectal or appendiceal origin who underwent HIPEC with MMC or oxaliplatin between October 2006 and September 2009. Hematologic toxicities were graded according to the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0. Results Of the 187 patients, 55 had oxaliplatin-based HIPEC while 132 patients received MMC. Splenectomy was performed in 95 patients (50.8%) due to disease involvement. When comparing hematologic toxicity for MMC and oxaliplatin among the cohort of patients who underwent splenectomy, a statistically significant difference was noted in the incidence of platelet (P = .02) and neutrophil (P = .05) toxicity, with oxaliplatin having a higher incidence of grade 3 and grade 4 platelet and neutrophil toxicity respectively. However, no statistically significant difference in hematologic toxicity was noted between the two agents in patients who did not undergo splenectomy during cytoreductive surgery. Conclusions Oxaliplatin-based HIPEC for PC of colorectal and appendiceal origin is associated with similar white blood cell toxicity and higher platelet and neutrophil toxicity compared to MMC-based HIPEC.