Search

Background/Objectives: Endometriosis (END) is a painful gynecological condition. Clinical examination, imaging, and laparoscopy can provide a definitive diagnosis of END. Nonetheless, non-invasive biomarkers could help enhance and streamline the diagnostic process. Micro-RNAs (miRNAs), a family of small non-coding RNAs, could serve as useful non-invasive biomarkers for END. The aim of this study was to perform serum miRNA profiling in a retrospective cohort of women to identify miRNAs that are differentially expressed in END compared to control patients. Methods: RNA was isolated from serum samples of 67 END patients and 60 control women. The expression profile of a 754-miRNA panel was studied with RT-qPCR performed on a QuantStudio 12K Flex with the TaqMan OpenArray miRNA panel. A Censored Regression Model was used for miRNA differential expression analysis. Several gene-enrichment algorithms were employed to identify pathways related to the target genes of differentially expressed miRNAs. Results: One hundred and thirty miRNAs were detected in at least 75% of samples from either the END or the control group. Sixteen miRNAs were significantly modulated between the END and control groups. Enrichment analysis identified targets significantly overrepresented in numerous pathways involved in biological processes related to END, including inflammation, angiogenesis, cellular invasion, cell-cycle/cell proliferation, and estrogen and progesterone hormonal signaling. Conclusions: Our study indicates that differentially expressed miRNAs between END patients and controls can be identified through liquid biopsy. Our findings also suggest a potential role for serum miRNAs in the pathophysiology of END, warranting further investigations for their use as non-invasive biomarkers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objectives: Cervical cancer (CC) represents a significant health concern worldwide, particularly for younger women. Cold knife (CK) conization and carbon dioxide (CO2) laser conization are two techniques commonly used to remove pre-invasive lesions, offering a potential curative intent in cases of incidental diagnosis of CC. This study aimed to assess the clinical implications and pathological outcomes of CK vs. CO2 laser conization for pre-invasive lesions. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed women who underwent CO2 or CK conization for high-grade preinvasive lesions (CIN2/3, CIS and AIS) between 2010 and 2022. Patient demographics, surgical details and pathological outcomes were collected. Pregnancy outcomes, including composite adverse obstetric rates, and oncological follow-up data, were also obtained. Results: In all, 1270 women were included; of them, 1225 (96.5%) underwent CO2, and 45 (3.5%) underwent CK conization. Overall, the rate of positive endocervical or deep margins was lower with CO2 laser compared to CK (4.3% vs. 13.3%, p = 0.015). Incidental CC was diagnosed in 56 (4.4%) patients, with 35 (62.5%) squamous and 21 (46.6%) adenocarcinomas. In a multivariate regression model, the relative risk for positive endocervical or deep margins is significantly greater in cases of incidental diagnosis of CC (p < 0.01). In cases of incidental diagnosis of CC, we found that the probabilities of having either positive endocervical or deep margins after CO2 laser or CK conization are similar, with a higher risk in case of adenocarcinoma lesion. Among women with CC, 42 (75%) opted for radical treatment, while 14 (25%) underwent a follow-up. Only one woman (7.1%) in the follow-up group, who had undergone CK conization, experienced a composite adverse obstetric outcome. No recurrences were observed after a median follow-up of 53 months. Conclusions: CO2 laser conization achieved a lower positive margin rate overall. CK and CO2 conization appear to be equivalent oncological options for incidental CC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]