Search

BackgroundThe incidence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is increasing. The aim of the study was to provide reference survival data for patients with advanced iCCA treated with first-line cisplatin-gemcitabine chemotherapy (current standard of care).MethodsIndividual data from patients with iCCA recruited into the prospective, random assignment Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer (ABC)-01, -02, and -03 studies were retrieved. The prevalence and survival of liver-only iCCA was also assessed. Survival analysis was performed using univariate and multivariable Cox regression. All statistical tests were two-sided.ResultsOf 534 patients recruited into the ABC-01, -02, and -03 studies, 109 (20.4%) had iCCA. Most patients (n = 86, 78.9%) had metastatic disease at the time of recruitment; 52 patients (47.7%) had liver-only disease. Following random assignment, 66 (60.6%) iCCA patients received cisplatin and gemcitabine. The median progression-free and overall survival (OS) were 8.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI] = 5.9 to 8.9 months) and 15.4 months (95% CI = 11.1 to 17.9 months), respectively. Of these 66 patients, 34 patients (51.5%) had liver-only disease. Following chemotherapy, 30 (45.5%) and 21 (31.8%) were progression-free at 3 and 6 months from chemotherapy commencement, respectively. The median OS for patients with liver-only iCCA at diagnosis and after 3 and 6 months of chemotherapy was 16.7 months (95% CI = 8.7 to 20.2 months), 17.9 months (95% CI = 11.7 to 20.9 months), and 18.9 months (95% CI = 16.7 to 25.9 months), respectively. Multivariable analysis confirmed that iCCA had a longer OS compared with other non-iCCA biliary tract cancers (hazard ratio = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.35 to 0.95, P value = .03); liver-only iCCA patients also showed longer OS even though findings did not reach statistical significance (hazard ratio = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.36 to 1.19, P value = .16).ConclusionsPatients diagnosed with advanced iCCA have a better OS compared with other biliary tract cancers; a similar trend was identified for patients diagnosed with liver-only iCCA. These findings are to be considered for future clinical trial design.

IMPORTANCE: Administration of gemcitabine-cisplatin, the current standard therapy for advanced biliary tract cancers, results in median progression-free survival and overall survival of 8.0 and 11.7 months, respectively. New treatments offering improved survival outcomes are therefore needed. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between progression-free survival and the addition of nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab)–paclitaxel to gemcitabine-cisplatin for the treatment of patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This open-label, single-arm, phase 2 clinical trial conducted at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center and the Mayo Clinic in Phoenix, Arizona, enrolled 62 patients with advanced biliary tract cancers between April 14, 2015, and April 24, 2017. INTERVENTIONS: Patients initially received gemcitabine, 1000 mg/m(2), cisplatin, 25 mg/m(2), and nab-paclitaxel, 125 mg/m(2), on days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Owing to hematologic adverse events among the first 32 patients enrolled, these starting doses were reduced to 800, 25, and 100 mg/m(2), respectively, for the remaining 28 patients. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary trial end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. RESULTS: Of 60 patients who started treatment, the mean (SD) age was 58.4 (11.0) years, 38 (63%) had intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, 9 (15%) had extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, 13 (22%) had gallbladder cancer, 47 (78%) had metastatic disease, and 13 (22%) had locally advanced disease. Median follow-up was 12.2 (95% CI, 9.4-19.4) months, and median progression-free survival was 11.8 (95% CI, 6.0 to 15.6) months. The partial response rate was 45%, and the disease control rate was 84%. Median overall survival was 19.2 months (95% CI, 13.2 months to not estimable). Patients in the safety population (n = 57) received a median of 6 (interquartile range, 3-11) cycles of treatment; 26 patients (46%) remained on their starting dose throughout the trial. Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 58% of patients, and 9 patients (16%) withdrew owing to adverse events. Neutropenia was the most common grade 3 or higher adverse event, occurring in 19 patients (33%) overall. Post hoc analyses showed that treatment efficacy was not significantly associated with starting dose, tumor type, or disease status and that tolerability was improved with reduced- vs high-dose treatment. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Treatment with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine-cisplatin prolonged median progression-free survival and overall survival vs those reported for historical controls treated with gemcitabine-cisplatin alone. These findings will be tested in a phase 3 randomized clinical trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02392637

430 Background: The combination of cisplatin-based chemotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors is extensively investigated in urothelial carcinoma. Using this combination in the neoadjuvant setting for patients (pts) with MIUC might improve pathological response rate (PaR: 1 EFS at 2 years ≥ 65% compared to H0 EFS at 2 years ≤ 50%. We report the secondary endoints PaR, pathological complete remission (pCR: ypT0 N0), and safety on the full analysis set (FAS, received at least one dose of durva). Results: 61 pts were included between 7/18 and 9/19 at 12 sites. The FAS consists of 58 pts (79% male, median age 67.5 yrs) with bladder cancer (95%) or upper urinary tract/urethral cancer (5%). Clinical T2, T3, T4 stage were present at diagnosis in 69%, 21%, 10%, respectively, and 17% had cN1. 95% of pts received all 4 doses of neoadjuvant durva, 81% all 4 cycles of cis/gem and 17% switched to carboplatin. In total grade 3 and 4 adverse events (AE) during neoadjuvant treatment occurred in 48% and 27%, respectively. AEs related to durva were G3 in 7 pts (12%) and G4 in one patient (2%). Resection was performed in 53 pts (91%; 51 radical cystectomy, 2 nephroureterectomy), 4 pts refused surgery and one patient was irresectable due to a frozen pelvis. R0 resection was achieved in 52 pts (98%), one had R1. Postoperative complications included Clavien-Dindo III in 13 pts (24%) and IV in 5 pts (9%). PaR was found in 60% (95% CI 46.0%-73.5%) with 18 pts achieving pCR (34%; 95% CI 21.5%-48.3%) and 14 patients (26%) ypT1/ypTis. Conclusions: The first FAS results for neoadjuvant durvalumab in combination with cis/gem for operable MIUC confirm elevated pathological response rates and demonstrate acceptable safety. Postoperative morbidity is relevant but not exceeding the expected frequency or severity. Clinical trial information: NCT03406650.

9051 Background: Patients (pts) with resectable stage IB (≥4cm)-IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) derive modest overall survival benefit with neoadjuvant or postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. Neoadjuvant therapy can speed the discovery of promising regimens by using pathologic response as a surrogate for OS. Major pathologic response (MPR), defined as < 10% viable tumor, was strongly associated with improved OS. PD-(L)1 checkpoint inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy are standard of care in advanced NSCLC. We hypothesize that the addition of N to neoadjuvant CP or CG will increase the MPR rate compared to historical controls. Methods: This is an investigator-initiated trial for pts with newly diagnosed AJCC 8th stage IB (≥4cm)-IIIA squamous or non-squamous EGFR/ALK WT NSCLC with a plan to have surgery. Pts receive 3 courses of N 360mg IV q 3w added to C 75mg/m2 IV q 3w plus P 500 mg/m2 IV q 3wks or G 1250mg/m2 IV d1, d8 with surgery 3 wks after the last dose. The primary objective is MPR. To estimate pathologic response, the resected pathology specimens are cut >1 section/cm. Using the Aperio Digital scanning system©, slides were imaged, and then annotated by at least 2 pathologists for viable tumor vs. treatment effect with respective areas then automatically calculated and percentage of viable tumor calculated. Our primary endpoint will be reached if 10/34 (29%) planned pts have at least an MPR. Results: From 6/2018-8/2019, 13 pts were enrolled all of whom had surgery. Median age was 69 (49-80), 38% women, 31% nonsquamous, 54% stage IIIA, and 77% PD-L1 positive (≥1%, SP263). Pre-surgical grade 3 toxicity occurred in 2/13 pts, one of whom was changed to carboplatin for courses 2 and 3. Grade 3 toxicities were neutropenia (2/13), anemia (1/13), and renal (1/13). One pt. developed hypothyroidism 4 mos after surgery. One pt died 6 weeks after surgery from complications unrelated to study drugs. Our primary endpoint was met; 11/13 (85%), had at least an MPR with 6/13 (46%) and 5/13 (38%) having an MPR and pCR respectively. Radiologic response rate was 46% (PR 5, CR 1). Pts with either PD-L1+ or PD-L1- had MPRs. With a median follow-up of 10 months there are no recurrences. Conclusions: The combination of nivolumab added to platinum doublets was well tolerated. The primary endpoint of MPR in at least 10/34 pts was surpassed with MPR or pCR in 11/13 pts post-surgery. MPR was seen independent of PD-L1 score. Exploratory outcomes assessing markers of immune bias in tumor tissue and plasma are in process. Clinical trial information: NCT03366766.

4003 Background: Level A evidence supports use of CisGem as first-line chemotherapy for ABC; no robust evidence is available for second-line chemotherapy. Methods: Pts diagnosed with ABC with disease progression after prior CisGem were randomised (1:1) to either ASC+mFOLFOX or ASC. Randomisation was stratified by serum albumin levels ( < 35 vs ≥35 g/L), platinum sensitivity (determined from first-line CisGem) and disease extent (locally advanced vs metastatic). Pts with ECOG PS0-1, adequate haematological, renal and liver function, and adequate biliary drainage were eligible. Primary end-point was overall survival (OS) (multivariable Cox regression adjusted for stratification factors); sample size: 162 pts delivering 148 events were required (80% power; 5% two-sided alpha) for a hypothesised hazard ratio (HR) of 0.63. Assumed median survival for ASC was 4 months. Results: 162 pts (81 in each arm) were randomised (27 March ‘14 - 04 Jan ‘18); median age 65 yrs (range 26-84); sex: 80 (49%) male, 82 (51%) female; primary site: intrahepatic 72 (44%), extrahepatic 45 (28%), gallbladder 34 (21%) and ampullary 11 (7%). Baseline characteristics were balanced between arms except platinum sensitivity (ASC+mFOLFOX 27 pts (33%); ASC 34 pts (42%)). After 150 OS events, the adjusted HR was 0.69 (95% CI 0.50-0.97; p = 0.031; ASC+mFOLFOX vs ASC). Median OS (months (m)), 6m and 12m OS-rate (%) were 6.2m, 50.6% and 25.9% for the ASC+mFOLFOX and 5.3m, 35.5%, 11.4% for the ASC arm, respectively. Grade 3/4 toxicities were reported in 48 (59%) and 32 (39%) pts in the ASC+mFOLFOX and ASC arm, respectively; these were balanced between arms except for fatigue and neutropenia (more frequent in ASC+mFOLFOX arm); data cleaning is ongoing. No chemotherapy-related deaths were reported. Conclusion: Survival with ASC was greater than assumed; ASC+mFOLFOX improved OS after progression to CisGem with a clinically meaningful increase in 6m and 12m OS rate. ASC+mFOLFOX should become standard of care in second-line for ABC. Clinical trial information: NCT01926236.

OBJECTIVES We compared the efficacy and tolerability of cisplatin, gemcitabine, and treosulfan (CGT) therapy in younger patients (age

4084Background: Sel (AZD6244, ARR142886) is an oral MEK inhibitor, with preclinical evidence of synergy with Gem in BTC. CisGem is standard first-line treatment for advanced BTC. This trial assesse...

TPS8582Background: For patients (pts) with stage IB (≥4cm)-IIIA Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), multi-modality therapy yields a modest improvement in 5 year post-surgical overall survival (OS),...

Gemcitabine plus treosulfan (GeT) is under investigation in metastatic uveal melanoma. In this phase II trial, cisplatin was added to a GeT regimen to investigate the efficacy and toxicity of two alkylating agents in combination with gemcitabine. Patients received 30 or 40 mg/m2 of cisplatin, 1000 mg/m2 of gemcitabine and 3000 mg/m2 of treosulfan on days 1 and 8. Therapy was repeated on day 29. A maximum of six cycles was administered. Nineteen patients were included in the trial, of whom 17 were evaluable for response. No objective response was observed; seven patients (41%) had stable disease and 10 (59%) progressed. The median progression-free survival of all 19 patients was 3.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.8–3.1]; the median overall survival was 7.7 months (95% CI, 1.9–13.8). Grade 3 and 4 thrombopenia and leucopenia occurred in eight and nine of the 19 patients, respectively. The addition of cisplatin to the GeT regimen results in excessive haematological toxicity without improvement in efficacy.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves the survival of patients with high-risk urothelial cancer. However, the lack of curative alternatives to cisplatin-based chemotherapy is limiting for patients with neuropathy or hearing loss. Sequential chemotherapy also has not been well studied in the neoadjuvant setting. The authors explored sequential neoadjuvant ifosfamide-based chemotherapy in a patient cohort at high risk of noncurative cystectomy. METHODS: Patients with muscle-invasive cancer and lymphovascular invasion, hydronephrosis, clinical T3b and T4a (cT3b-4a) disease (defined as a 3-dimensional mass on examination under anesthetic or invasion into local organs), micropapillary tumors, or upper tract disease received 3 cycles of combined ifosfamide, doxorubicin, and gemcitabine followed by 4 cycles of combined cisplatin, gemcitabine, and ifosfamide. The primary endpoint was downstaging to pT1N0M0 disease or lower. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 85.3 months, the 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) rates for all 65 patients were 63% and 68%, respectively (95% confidence interval: 5-year OS rate, 0.52%-0.76%; 5-year DSS rate, 0.58%-0.81%). Pathologic downstaging to pT1N0 disease or lower occurred in 50% of patients who underwent cystectomy and in 60% of patients who underwent nephroureterectomy and was correlated with the 5-year OS rate (pT1N0 disease or lower, 87%; pT2-pT3aN0 disease, 67%; and pT3b disease or higher or lymph node-negative disease, 27%; P ≤ .001 for pT1 or lower vs pT2 or higher). Variant histology was associated with an inferior 5-year DSS rate (50% vs 83% in pure transitional cell carcinoma; P = .02). The most frequent grade 3 toxicities were infection (38%), febrile neutropenia (22%), and mucositis (18%). There were 3 grade 4 toxicities (myocardial infarction, thrombocytopenia, and vomiting) and 1 grade 5 toxicity in a patient who refused antibiotics for pneumonia. CONCLUSIONS: Sequential therapy was active and maintained the historic expectation of achieving a cure. The current results strongly reinforced previous experience suggesting that pathologic downstaging to pT1N0 disease or less is a useful surrogate for eventual cure in patients with urothelial cancer. Cancer 2013. © 2012 American Cancer Society.

Rationale The IFCT–GFPC 0502 phase III reported prolongation of progression-free survival with maintenance with either gemcitabine or erlotinib versus observation after cisplatin-gemcitabine chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC. Their incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was assessed in global population and in pre specified sub-groups. Methods A cost-utility analysis was performed to evaluate ICER of maintenance therapy with either gemcitabine or erlotinib, compared to observation. Direct medical costs (drugs costs, hospitalization, examinations, second-line treatments and palliative costs) were prospectively collected per patient alongside the trial, until death, from the third party payer perspective. Utility were extracted from literature. Sensitivity analyses were performed. Results ICER for maintenance therapy with gemcitabine and erlotinib were respectively 76 625 and 184 733 €/quality-adjusted life years (QALY). Gemcitabine maintenance therapy had favourable ICER in patients with PS = 0 (52 213 €/QALY), in responders to induction chemotherapy (64 296 €/QALY) and in patients with adenocarcinoma (62 292 €/QALY); erlotinib had favourable ICER if PS = 0 (94 908 €/QALY), in patients with adenocarcinoma (97 160 €/QALY) and objective response to induction (101,186 €/QALY), but it is not cost-effective in patients with PS = 1, other histology or if stable disease. Conclusion Gemcitabine and erlotinib maintenance therapy have acceptable ICER but with wide variation, function of histology, PS and response to the first line chemotherapy. Disclosure I. Borget: Honoraria from Roche for set up a class in health economy (no relation with the present study). M. Perol: consultant or advisory board with Roche, Lilly (myself) Honoraria from Lilly, Roche, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim (myself) Research funding from Lilly, Roche (myself). D. Perol: Honoraria : Roche (myself). G. Zalcman: Honoraria from Lilly, Roche Research funding from Lilly, Roche. A. Vergnenegre: honoraria and research funding from Roche. C. Chouaid: Honoraria from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Hoffman la Roche, Astra Zeneka, Sanofi Aventis, Lilly, Novartis and Amgen Research funding from AstraZeneca, Lilly, Novartis and Amgen. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

TPS11134 Background: Despite advances in tumor imaging and pathology, patients with CUP still account for about 2-3% of all cancer patients in European registries. Two randomized phase II trials: G...

4090 Background. Cisplatin + gemcitabine (CisGem) is a standard of care for advanced biliary tract cancer (ABC; Valle et al. 2010). Selumetinib (S; AZD6244, ARRY-142886) potently and selectively in...

4002 Background: ABCs exhibit increased VEGF expression, correlating with metastatic disease. Combining cediranib (which inhibits VEGFR1, 2 and 3 tyrosine kinase and VEGF-induced signaling in endot...

e18548 Background: The standard first-line treatment for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) has been cisplatin plus etoposide (PE). Phase II studies showed comparable outcomes and less toxicity with platinum-doublets containing gemcitabine or vinorelbine. Aiming to improve response rates without increasing toxicity, we evaluated the combination of cisplatin, gemcitabine plus vinorelbine (PGV) in comparison to PE. Methods: Patients with ES-SCLC, ECOG 0-1, admitted from January 2002 to January 2011 in two brazilian institutions were analyzed. We compared patients treated with PE (cisplatin 80 mg/m2 D1 and etoposide 100 mg/m2 D1-D3 every 3 weeks for up to 6 cycles) versus modified PGV (cisplatin 80 mg/m2 D1, gemcitabine 1500 mg/m2 D1 and vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 D1 every 3 weeks for up to 6 cycles). Results: Of 69 patients analyzed, 29 were treated with PGV and 40 with PE. Clinical characteristics were comparable in both groups, except for adrenal metastases that were more frequent in PE group (20% vs. 0%; p=0,02). Overall response and complete response rates with PGV and PE were 75.9% vs. 65.0% (p=0.33) and 6 (20.7%) vs. 3(7.5%) (p=0.15), respectively. Median progression-free survival for PGV and PE was 6.47 and 5.06 months (p=0.37). Median overall survival for PGV and PE was 10.94 months versus 9.65 months (p=0.76). Severe neutropenia was higher with PE versus PGV (57.1% vs. 23.1%; p=0.01). Severe vomiting (38.5% vs. 17.2%; p=0.07) and peripheral neuropathy (15.4% vs. 5.3%; p=0.37) were more common with PGV than PE, although without statistical significance. Conclusions: Modified PGV presented comparable efficacy to standard PE in the first-line treatment of ES-SCLC. Response rates were higher with PGV, but without statistical significance. PGV showed less severe neutropenia than PE, but higher non-significant severe vomiting and neuropathy. Prospective studies with a large number of patients should be provided to confirm these results.

e15016 Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with MVAC has been shown to improve overall survival in patients with muscle invasive transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder (MIBC), with pathological complete response (pCR) correlating with a survival benefit. Despite the lack of randomized data for cisplatin/gemcitabine (GC) in the neoadjuvant setting, it is commonly used in clinical practice, given its favorable toxicity profile and comparable efficacy to MVAC in the context of metastatic disease. Methods: Data was retrospectively obtained on 93 patients with T2-T4, N0-2 M0 MIBC treated with curative intent in our institution between 2005-2011. Characteristics of patients treated with GC NAC, along with treatment tolerance and outcomes, were collected. Results: Of 93 patients, 27% (n=25) were treated with GC NAC. Median age was 66 (range 49-81). 88% (n=22) of patients were clinical stage T3/4 and/or N1/2. 68% of patients received 28-day cycles of GC, with 32% receiving 21-day cycles of GC. One patient had split cisplatin dosing. 91% and 82% of planned cisplatin and gemcitabine were delivered, respectively. There were no treatment-related deaths. On completion of NAC, 52% (n=13) of patients underwent radical cystectomy, of whom 38% (n=5) achieved a pCR, and 62% (n=8) were downstaged to non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (nMIBC). Definitive chemoradiotherapy was used in 20% (n=5) of patients, whilst 12% (n=3) had no radical treatment due to progressive disease (n=2), or to a decline in ECOG performance status (n=1). Amongst patients without radical cystectomy, 12% (n=3) of patients achieved a biopsy-proven clinical complete response (cCR). In the intent-to-treat population, median disease-free survival was 32 months, and median overall survival 38.8 months. All patients with a pCR, cCR, or downstaging to nMIBC (n=12), were alive at a median follow-up of 16 months (3.9 – 49.1 months), although 1 patient had relapsed. Conclusions: GC is a well-tolerated regimen in the neoadjuvant treatment of MIBC, with a pCR rate comparable to that reported with MVAC. Our findings support the use of GC in the neoadjuvant treatment of MIBC.

8039 Background: AVAiL, an international placebo-controlled phase III trial, showed that Bv-based therapy significantly improved PFS and response rate in patients with advanced/recurrent NSCLC. This report summarizes overall safety findings from AVAiL. Methods: AVAiL randomized 1,043 patients with untreated locally advanced, metastatic or recurrent non-squamous NSCLC to C 80mg/m2 (d1) and G 1,250mg/m2 (d1 and d8) q3w for up to 6 cycles plus either Bv 7.5mg/kg q3w (n=331 with safety data), Bv 15mg/kg q3w (n=329) or placebo (n=326). Bv/placebo was administered until disease progression. Primary endpoint was PFS; secondary endpoints included OS, response rate, and safety. Safety was measured using NCI-CTC version 3.0 criteria for adverse events (AEs). Results: At final analysis, the median/maximum duration of Bv therapy was 4.9/28.5 mo (Bv 7.5) and 4.3/23.4 mo (Bv 15). The most common AEs overall were hematological and gastrointestinal (GI), and occurred in similar proportions of pts in the Bv and placebo arms. Grade ≥3 AEs occurred in 80%, 83%, and 77% of pts in the Bv 7.5, Bv 15 and placebo arms, respectively. The most common grade ≥3 adverse events were hematological, mainly neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Neutropenia was reported in 43% (Bv 7.5), 40% (Bv 15) and 34% (placebo) of pts. Grade ≥3 AEs of special interest included hypertension (7%, 9% and 2%), proteinuria (2%, 3% and 0%), bleeding (4%, 5% and 2%) and hemoptysis (0.5%, 1.2% and 1.3%). The incidence of grade 5 hemoptysis was low (0.9%, 0.9% and 0% of pts, respectively). The incidence of GI perforations ( [Table: see text]

8050 Background: AVAiL, an international, placebo-controlled, phase III trial, evaluated Bv plus CG in pts with previously untreated advanced, non-squamous NSCLC, with performance status 0/1. A retrospective analysis was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of Bv plus CG in the subpopulation of elderly pts (≥65 years [yrs]). Methods: 1,043 pts (age 20–83) were randomized to C 80mg/m2 and G 1,250mg/m2 q3w for up to 6 cycles plus either Bv 7.5mg/kg q3w (Bv 7.5; n=345), Bv 15mg/kg q3w (Bv 15; n=351) or placebo (Pl; n=347). Bv/Pl was administered until disease progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (RR) and safety. Efficacy and safety were compared between pts 6 cycles. Bv-treated pts ≥65 yrs derived an improvement in PFS compared to Pl (Bv 7.5: HR 0.71, p 0.023; Bv 15: HR 0.84, p= 0.25). ORRs were 40%, 29% and 30% for pts ≥65 in the Bv 7.5, Bv 15 and Pl arms. Survival was similar in all treatment arms regardless of age, (pts ≥65 Bv 7.5 HR 0.84; Bv 15 HR 0.88, p=NS). Safety data were available for 284 pts ≥65 yrs and 702 pts [Table: see text]

e22081 Background: The human MDR1 gene encodes an integral membrane protein, P glycoprotein (Pgp), whose function is the energy dependent export of substances from the inside of cells, and from membranes, to the outside. MDR1 mRNA levels have been shown to influence metabolism of cancer drugs. We tested whether MDR1 gene expression is associated with outcome in patients with locally advanced bladder cancer. Methods: 43 formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tumor samples from patients with locally advanced and/or lymph node-positive bladder cancer undergoing treatment with cisplatin/gemcitabine were analyzed.FFPE tissues were dissected using laser-captured microdissection and analyzed for MDR1 expression using a quantitative real- time RT-PCR method. Gene expression values (relative mRNA levels) are expressed as ratios between the target gene and internal reference gene (beta-actin). Results: MDR1 was significantly correlated to overall survival. We included tumor stage (pT), lymph node status (pN) and the blood vessel invasion along with the measured gene expression in a stepwise multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model. The overall model fit had a significance level of p=0.04 ( [Table: see text]

5023 Background: Fifty-percent of pts with MIBC develops metastases after RC. The role of AC in muscle invasive bladder cancer is under debate as data from 6 randomised trials, moreover with seriou...

17008 Background: New effective therapies are needed to improve the outcome of patients with advanced NSCLC. In this regard, new approaches such as cisplatin-based triplets have been explored with promising results but high toxicity. Furthermore, sequential chemotherapy schedules with taxanes followed by cisplatin-based regimens or viceversa could improve activity. A phase II study showed that sequential chemotherapy with weekly paclitaxel followed by CGV was highly active. Methods: A multicenter, randomized phase II trial of PCGV vs CGV in advanced NSCLC patients was conducted. Primary end-point: time to progression and survival. Eligible pts had unresectable, histologically confirmed NSCLC; no prior chemotherapy; PS 0–2; measurable disease. Pts received: Arm A (PCGV): P 150 mg /m2/week × 6, followed 2 weeks later by C 100 mg/m2 on day 1, gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 14, and vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 14 (CGV), every 28 days for a maximum of six courses. Arm B (CGV): C 100 mg/m2 on day 1, gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 14, and vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 14 (CGV), every 28 days for a maximum of six courses. Results: 106 Pts were included. Pts baseline characteristics (A/B: 52/54): male 82/79%; median age 60/59 (range 38–75 years); PS 0: 30/33%; 1 63/60%; 2: 7/7%; % squamous carcinoma:44/42%.WHO grade 3–4 toxicities for P were: neutropenia 18%; anemia 10%; thrombocytopenia 2%, peripheral neuropathy 18%. Grade 3–4 toxicities for CGV after P were: neutropenia 31%,nausea-vomiting 20%,thrombocytopenia 7%,anemia 5%,peripheral neuropathy 21%. WHO grade 3–4 toxicities for arm B were: neutropenia 35%,nausea-vomiting 19%, anemia 12%, thrombocytopenia 11% and peripheral neuropathy 15%. After therapy with arm A, 44% achieved a partial response, 15% had stabilization and 41% progressed. Arm B response rate were as follows: partial response 33%, stable disease 24% and progressive disease 43%. Median time to progression was (A/B) 7/6 months (log rank test, p 0.13) and median survival was (A/B): 11/10 months (log rank test, p 0.5). Conclusions: In spite of high response rate in TCGV arm, no survival benefit was detected in advanced NSCLC patients. No significant financial relationships to disclose.