Search

We sought to investigate the patient and physician approaches to malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) due to recurrent gynecologic cancer by (1) comparing patient and physician expectations and priorities during a new MBO diagnosis, and (2) highlighting factors that facilitate patient-doctor communication. Patients were interviewed about their experience during an admission for MBO, and physicians were interviewed about their general approach towards MBO. Interviews were analyzed for themes using QDAMiner qualitative analysis software. The analysis utilized the framework analysis and used both predetermined themes and those that emerged from the data. We interviewed 14 patients admitted with MBO from recurrent gynecologic cancer and 15 gynecologic oncologists. We found differences between patients and physicians regarding plans for next chemotherapy treatments, foremost priorities, communication styles, and need for end-of-life discussions. Both patients and physicians felt that patient-physician communication was improved in situations of trust, understanding patient preferences, corroboration of information, and increased time spent with patients during and before the MBO. Gaps in patient-physician communication could be targeted to improve the patient experience and physician counseling during a difficult diagnosis. Our findings emphasize a need for patient-physician discussions to focus on expectations for future cancer-directed treatments, support for patients at home with home health or hospice level support in line with their wishes, and acknowledgement of uncertainty while providing direct information about the MBO diagnosis.

PURPOSE: Malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) from gynecologic cancer is associated with increased symptoms and short survival. A gynecologic oncologist’s approach to palliative care consultation in the setting of MBO has not been well studied—it could be an opportune time for collaboration with palliative care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This qualitative analysis of interviews with gynecologic oncologists focuses on their perspectives on palliative care consultation at the time of MBO. Interviews were analyzed using a framework analysis, and key themes and quotations were extracted. RESULTS: We interviewed 15 gynecologic oncologists from 8 institutions in Chicago. They described a variety of expectations from palliative care consultation. Most frequently, they consulted palliative care for specific questions but managed the remainder of the care. Most participants frequently consulted palliative care, but they also worried about fragmentation of care, the timing of when to introduce a new team during MBO, and the selection of appropriate patients for a limited resource. Many participants preferred earlier palliative care consultation, and many described an emotional toll of caring for patients with MBO. Palliative care consultation was most readily discussed for nonsurgical patients. CONCLUSION: Participants’ expectations of palliative care consultations during MBO varied and were not always met. We recommend strengthening communication and protocols for palliative care involvement that meet the needs of specific patient populations and physician teams for surgical and nonsurgical patients. More research is needed to better understand how to integrate palliative care into oncologic and surgical care with gynecologic oncologists.

Molecular tumor profiling and next-generation sequencing are being increasingly utilized, but there are limited data on the therapeutic implications and potential benefits of targeted treatments. We aim to characterize gynecologic oncology patients referred for somatic tumor genetic mutation testing and assess survival outcomes, efficacy, and toxicities of those receiving targeted therapy.We conducted a retrospective chart review of gynecologic oncology patients referred for somatic tumor testing by next generation sequencing between 1/1/2012-8/23/2019. The primary objective was to compare overall and progression free survival between those treated with targeted therapy (group 1) versus traditional treatment (group 2).Most patients (70%) had additional treatment options available based on actionable mutations. The median number of somatic mutations identified was 5 (range 0-53). Patients in group 1 had more actionable somatic mutations (median 2 versus 0, p 0.001). There was no difference in OS (median 64 versus 76 months, p = 0.97) or PFS (median 2 versus 8 months, p = 0.05) between the groups. While fewer patients in group 1 experienced neuropathy (0 versus 5, p = 0.02), grade I/II thrombocytopenia (7 versus 13, p = 0.03), grade III/IV thrombocytopenia (0 versus 4, p = 0.02), and grade III/IV neutropenia (1 versus 9, p = 0.002), all other non-hematologic toxicities were similar in the two groups.Most gynecologic cancer patients have actionable mutations and may benefit from a personalized targeted therapy treatment plan. Next generation sequencing can be used to identify clinically actionable mutations in gynecologic cancers and guide the selection of treatments, thereby expanding treatment options without worsening survival or toxicity.

Purpose We sought to investigate the patient and physician approaches to malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) due to recurrent gynecologic cancer by 1) comparing patient and physician expectations and priorities during a new MBO diagnosis, and 2) highlighting factors that facilitate patient-doctor communication.Methods Patients were interviewed about their experience during an admission for MBO, and physicians were interviewed about their general approach towards MBO. Interviews were analyzed for themes using QDAMiner qualitative analysis software. The analysis utilized the framework analysis and used both predetermined themes and those that emerged from the data.Results We interviewed 14 patients admitted with MBO from recurrent gynecologic cancer and 15 gynecologic oncologists. We found differences between patients and physicians regarding plans for next chemotherapy treatments, foremost priorities, communication styles, and end-of-life discussions. Both patients and physicians felt that the patient-physician communication was improved in situations of trust, understanding patient preferences, corroboration of information, and increased time spent with patients during and before the MBO.Conclusion Gaps in patient-physician communication could be targeted to improve the patient experience and physician counseling during a difficulty diagnosis by focusing on education, symptoms, home support, nutrition, and end-of-life care.

Cervical cancer is the most common gynecologic cancer worldwide. Almost all are related to human papillomavirus exposure. Cervical cancer treatment is associated with significant morbidity that is likely to require support from palliative care teams. In these pearls on cervical cancer, we hope to inform providers about the common treatments and issues for cervical cancer patients. Treatment modalities include surgery for early-stage disease, radiation therapy for locally advanced disease, and pelvic exenteration, chemotherapy, or immunotherapy for recurrent disease. Cervical cancer causes pain and bleeding. Radiation can affect ovarian, urinary, and bowel function. Chemotherapy and immunotherapy are associated with fatigue and nausea. Fistulas between the vagina and bowel or bladder can occur due to cancer or to cancer treatments. Physical and emotional supportive care is important for women with cervical cancer.

When the COVID-19 pandemic began, formal frameworks to collect data about affected patients were lacking. The COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) was formed to collect granular data on patients with cancer and COVID-19 at scale and as rapidly as possible. CCC19 has grown from five initial institutions to 125 institutions with >400 collaborators. More than 5,000 cases with complete baseline data have been accrued. Future directions include increased electronic health record integration for direct data ingestion, expansion to additional domestic and international sites, more intentional patient involvement, and granular analyses of still-unanswered questions related to cancer subtypes and treatments.

Objective It is unclear if the types of surgical procedures performed on long-term survivors (LTS) of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) contribute to prolonged survival. In this case-control study we review the surgical procedures performed on LTS and describe their individual longitudinal disease courses. Methods Women with FIGO stage III–IV high-grade serous cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube or peritoneum were selected from the University of Chicago ovarian cancer database. LTS were those surviving >7 years and controls were short-term survivors (STS) living 1–2 years. Patients with non-serous histology, low grade, and low malignant potential tumors were excluded. Results We identified 450 women with stage III/IV HGSOC including 45 LTS and 78 STS. LTS showed a trend towards lower disease burden, yet underwent more aggressive surgical treatment. Interestingly, only 15 LTS (34%) were debulked to microscopic disease and 9 LTS (21%) underwent suboptimal debulking. Two LTS (5%) recurred within 12 months. LTS had heterogeneous clinical courses with 13 (29%) never experiencing a recurrence with 143 months median follow-up and 32 (71%) experiencing a recurrence with 115 months median follow-up. Of the women who recurred, 19 (59%) underwent at least one surgery for recurrence. Conclusions Aggressive surgical treatment intended to achieve microscopic disease, primary debulking surgery, preservation of sensitivity to chemotherapy, and recurrence amenable to secondary debulking are associated with long-term survival. However, clinicopathologic data are insufficient to predict long-term survival of HGSOC. Biologic characterization of these patient's tumors likely holds the key to understanding their unusually favorable courses.

The Chicago Consensus Working Group provides multidisciplinary recommendations for the management of ovarian neoplasms specifically related to the management of peritoneal surface malignancy. These guidelines are developed with input from leading experts, including surgical oncologists, medical oncologists, gynecologic oncologists, pathologists, radiologists, palliative care physicians, and pharmacists. These guidelines recognize and address the emerging need for increased awareness in the appropriate management of peritoneal surface disease. They are not intended to replace the quest for higher levels of evidence.

Objectives To describe and compare treatments and outcomes of patients with malignant bowel obstructions (MBO) due to uterine or ovarian cancer. Methods Retrospective chart review from two institutions of women admitted 1/1/2005–12/31/2016 with a MBO from recurrent/progressive uterine or ovarian cancer. Data collected includes patient characteristics, cancer-directed treatments before and after MBO, MBO management strategies, and survival after MBO. Results Women with MBO from uterine cancer (n = 46) and ovarian cancer (n = 130) underwent similar inpatient interventions such as inpatient chemotherapy and surgery. Median overall survival (OS) after admission for MBO for all patients was 105 days and was shorter for uterine cancer patients (57 vs 131 days, p = 0.0013). Uterine and ovarian cancer patients who had surgery had similar survival (182 vs 210 days, p = 0.6), as did those discharged on hospice from their first admission for MBO (26 vs 38 days, p = 0.1). Uterine and ovarian cancer patients had similar rates of post-discharge chemotherapy (37% vs 50%, p = 0.12), but uterine cancer patients who had chemotherapy still had shorter survival (151 vs 225 days, p = 0.03). Conclusions MBO has a relatively poor prognosis. Ovarian and uterine cancer patients whose interventions included surgery or hospice had similar outcomes. Among patients managed medically without hospice, uterine cancer patients experienced worse survival, even when candidates for subsequent chemotherapy. Patient counseling regarding goals of care at this difficult juncture can be informed by these findings and will be enhanced by patient-reported and qualitative data on the patient experience with MBO.

Purpose To evaluate whether intra-abdominal hemorrhage is visible on a modified focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) examination in stable obstetrics patients after a nonemergent cesarean delivery. Methods This was a prospective observational study of patients who underwent nonemergent cesarean delivery at a single institution. Patients provided written informed consent to participate in the study preoperatively and underwent a modified FAST examination in the recovery room within 2 hours of completion of surgery. A sonographic examination was considered positive for hemorrhage if an anechoic pocket consistent with free fluid was present. Results One hundred patients underwent suprapubic and bilateral upper-quadrant sonographic evaluations. The mean (±SD) time of the evaluation was 74.2 ± 36 minutes after the end of surgery. Among the 100 sonographic examinations of each upper quadrant, 194 (97.0%) were negative, 5 (2.5%) were indeterminate, and 1 (0.5%) was positive for fluid. All suprapubic sonographic examinations were considered inadequate. Conclusions Sonographic evaluation immediately after cesarean delivery is feasible in most patients and was overwhelmingly negative for intra-abdominal hemorrhage in a group of patients who did not require reoperation or unexpected blood transfusion. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Ultrasound, 2015

Although the median survival for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is5years, approximately 15% of patients will survive for10years. A better understanding of these exceptional responders could reveal opportunities to improve the dismal prognosis of most EOC patients. In this review, we examine the clinical and genomic features that have been associated with long-term survival, which is generally defined as survival of7-10years after initial diagnosis. Clinical features influencing long-term survival have been best reported in large retrospective population-based studies. These studies find that long-term survival is associated with previously validated prognostic factors, including younger age at diagnosis, earlier clinicopathologic stage, lower grade, non-serous histology, absence of ascites, primary debulking surgery, and optimal cytoreduction at primary surgery. Duration of survival after a recurrence also contributes to long-term survival and depends both on recurrence location and response to subsequent chemotherapy or surgery. Germline BRCA mutations, although associated with short-term chemosensitivity, do not appear to improve long-term survival. Unfortunately, the relative lack of recurrent somatic mutations in EOC has made the identification of genomic signatures associated with long-term survival difficult. Although six independent gene expression analyses of long-term survivors (LTS) have identified signatures associated with prolonged survival, different gene sets are identified in each study. Genes differentially expressed in tumors of LTS are broadly involved in cell proliferation, tumor-stromal interactions, the cytoskeleton, metabolism of nutrients, and immune/stress response. We anticipate that consistent selection of control and LTS groups, combined with the use of emerging transcriptomic, epigenomic, and proteomic platforms, is likely to identify conserved features associated with long-term survival. Further elucidating the factors contributing to long-term survival has the potential to contribute to our understanding of the biology of ovarian cancer, with the goal of improving the survival of all EOC patients.

813 Background: Despite published evidence based interventions for malignant bowel obstruction (MBO), implementation of a standard pathway is challenging. We hypothesized that using industrial engineering techniques and a modified dynamic sustainability framework for implementation, we can implement an electronic medical record (EMR) based pathway in the management of MBO. Methods: A workflow in the management of MBO was developed using iterative meetings from 8/2018 to 4/2019 including gateway stakeholders (surgical oncology, gynecological oncology and medical oncology), interventional stakeholders (gastroenterology, interventional radiology) and supportive stakeholders (hospital medicine, palliative care, nutrition, nursing). Industrial engineers were utilized to study human factors, and perform a method study. EMR integration was performed using EPIC systems Agile MD pathway and educational materials were created. Interventions such as early placement of gastrostomy tubes, total parenteral nutrition and medications were protocolized. Results: Since implementation, over 6 months the pathway and order set has been activated 56 times. Orders have been employed 21 times through the AgileMD pathway demonstrating a pathway drift of 62.5%. Educational materials have been accessed routinely during this time. Conclusions: Feasibility of implementing an EMR integrated MBO pathway is demonstrated with early suggestion of pathway drift. Utilizing tools of implementation science are necessary to facilitate widespread adoption of evidence based interventions in the management of patients with MBO.

To evaluate human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) trends after evacuation of complete hydatidiform moles to determine if urinary semiquantitative pregnancy tests (SQPTs) could replace blood draws. while still detecting early postmolar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.A retrospective review of complete hydatidiform moles at a safety-net hospital from 2003-2013 was performed. hCG curves were used to extrapolate expected SQPT results over timefor a resolving hydatidiform mole.Of 61 complete moles, 37 had an uncomplicated hCG decline and at least 4 serum hCG results. All of those patients had hCG10,000 mIU/mL within 15 days,2,000 within 64 days,500 within 70 days (92.2% within 1 month),100 within 89 days (90% within 2 months), and25 within 152 days (95.2% within 3 months). After reaching levels25, hCG rose only in cases of new pregnancies.Based on this retrospective analysis, SQPT monitoring could have avoided 90% of blood draws while still flagging all patients with subsequent postmolar GTN within 45 days by limiting blood draws to (1) patients with SQPT levels of10,000,500, and100 mIU/mL at 15, 30, and 45 days, respectively, (2) hCG25 after 60 days, or (3) increasing SQPT levels.

The implementation of cytology-based screening programs for precancerous lesions of the cervix has decreased the incidence of and mortality from cervical cancer in much of the developed world. Countries without the resources to install such frequent and laboratory-dependent screening programs have more and more options at their disposal. A screening program based on cytology analysis requires too much training, infrastructure, and repeated screening to be feasible. Visual inspection with acetic acid, often used throughout the world, is inexpensive and both sensitive and specific, but it lacks reproducibility. Although human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is too expensive for widespread use, its negative predictive value and sensitivity make it a promising method of screening. Utilizing HPV vaccines as a primary mode of prevention may not be financially feasible and does not obviate the need for screening. Cervical cancer has been considered an AIDS-defining illness, with HPV and HIV often coexisting, and screening methods have been shown to be as reliable for women with HIV as those without. Ultimately, the most clinically effective and cost-effective methods for reducing cervical cancer incidence are those that limit the number of visits that women are required to attend. Providing immediate cryotherapy for those with a positive screen, whether by visual inspection or HPV testing, is promising to have quite an impact, although the type of program implemented will depend on the needs and expectations of each country.

Objective: To find the optimal transcutaneous bilirubin (TcB) screening level in term neonates that minimizes the discomfort of phlebotomy, while protecting the child from harm and controlling costs. Methods: All available TcB and total serum bilirubin (TSB) measurements taken between 27 and 51 hours of life from a cohort of term newborns were analyzed in a retrospective chart review. TcB cutoffs between 6 and 12 mg/dL were evaluated for their negative predictive values (NPVs) for high risk (HR) and for the combination of high-intermediate risk and HR on the Bhutani TSB risk nomogram. Results: One thousand seventy-one full-term newborns were entered into the study. Of 601 newborns with TcB Conclusions: In our center, term infants with a TcB of

116 Background: Gynecologic oncologists’ (GO) approaches to palliative care team (PCT) consultation for managing patients with malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) from recurrent gynecologic cancer remains unknown. Methods: GO practicing in a large metropolitan area underwent semi-structured interviews exploring their approaches to PCT involvement at the time of diagnosis of a MBO and factors leading to specific recommendations. Interviews were analyzed using theoretical and open coding qualitative analysis. Results: 15 GO completed interviews. They were in academic (93%), urban (67%) settings and at a range of timepoints in their career. GO expressed mixed feelings regarding PCT consultation for their patients with MBO. Many were comfortable managing symptoms (pain, nausea) and limited consultations to uncontrolled symptoms. Others involved PCT for ongoing support regardless of symptom severity. GO were less likely to involve PCT to help with goal-setting discussions. Many GO held a “the earlier the better” stance, preferring to involve PCT in the outpatient setting. At a high-risk decision-point, such as MBO, these physicians felt that PCT consultation was overdue. In this setting, most participants reserved PCT consultations only for patients who were not surgical candidates. Barriers to PCT consultation for women with MBO centered around GO concerns that involving another team fragments care. Participants feared involving PCT would complicate patients’ experiences by requiring additional appointments, suggesting potential abandonment from their GO, and including an additional, potentially conflicting, source of information. Many GO mentioned they chose gynecologic oncology for the continuity of care and leading role in a patient’s cancer care. Conclusions: Overall, GO expressed comfort involving PCT outside of critical decision-points, yet were reticent to involve PCT at the time of MBO due to concerns of requiring the patient to deal with another team. Early incorporation of the PCT through a standardized co-management system in a GO outpatient clinic may improve communication and reduce barriers to PCT involvement.

To evaluate whether intra-abdominal hemorrhage is visible on a modified focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) examination in stable obstetrics patients after a nonemergent cesarean delivery.This was a prospective observational study of patients who underwent nonemergent cesarean delivery at a single institution. Patients provided written informed consent to participate in the study preoperatively and underwent a modified FAST examination in the recovery room within 2 hours of completion of surgery. A sonographic examination was considered positive for hemorrhage if an anechoic pocket consistent with free fluid was present.One hundred patients underwent suprapubic and bilateral upper-quadrant sonographic evaluations. The mean (±SD) time of the evaluation was 74.2 ± 36 minutes after the end of surgery. Among the 100 sonographic examinations of each upper quadrant, 194 (97.0%) were negative, 5 (2.5%) were indeterminate, and 1 (0.5%) was positive for fluid. All suprapubic sonographic examinations were considered inadequate.Sonographic evaluation immediately after cesarean delivery is feasible in most patients and was overwhelmingly negative for intra-abdominal hemorrhage in a group of patients who did not require reoperation or unexpected blood transfusion.

Objective. To test if hormone or growth factor receptor expression is associated with survival among patients with high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGS OvCa) we analyzed tumor mRNA expression microarray and clinical data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Methods. HGS OvCa patients were surgically staged prior to treatment with IP (n = 90) or IV-only (n = 398) chemotherapy. Multivariate Cox proportional-hazards regression tested associations of expression of 9 hormone or growth factor receptors with progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Hazard ratios are hazard per each one standard deviation increase in gene expression. Expression was analyzed as a continuous variable by restricted mean survival analysis. Mean PFS or OS were compared between IP and IV groups by permutation testing stratified by expression. P-values were two-tailed. Results. Expression of ESR1, PGR, FSHR, LHCGR, MET, and EGFR were not associated with PFS or OS. TSHR expression was associated with decreased OS (HR 1.22 (1.06-1.41), p = 0.005) and PFS (HR 1.18 (1.05-1.33), p = 0.006) among IV-only treated patients. ERBB2 expression was associated with decreased OS (HR 1.48 (1.05-2.10), p = 0.027) among patients who received IP chemotherapy. Using multigene (ESR2, PGR, TSHR, and ERBB2) analysis, among the IP group, ERBB2 (HR 1.76 (1.11-2.79), p = 0.015) and ESR2 (HR 0.28 (0.08-0.93), p = 0.037) were associated with OS. Only TSHR expression was associated with decreased OS (HR 1.22 (1.06-1.41), p = 0.005) and decreased PFS (HR 1.18 (1.05-1.33), p = 0.007) on multigene analysis of IV-only treated patients. OS and PFS decreased steeply at high expression of TSHR and ERBB2. Among patients with upper 10th percentile TSHR expression, no significant difference in mean OS or PFS was observed between patients treated with IP versus IV-only chemotherapy. Patients with lower TSHR expression (< 90% percentile) experienced a mean 13.7-month increased OS and 16.4-month increased PFS associated with IP chemotherapy (p < 0.0001). Conclusions. Among HGS OvCa patients treated with IV-only chemotherapy, increased tumor TSHR expression was associated with decreased OS and PFS. High TSHR expression characterized patients who did not benefit from IP chemotherapy. Citation Format: Brandon-Luke L. Seagle, Monica Dandapani, Chen Hui Luo, Claire Hoppenot, Robert Samuelson, Kevin H. Eng, Kunle Odunsi, Shohreh Shahabi. Overexpression of TSH and ERBB2 (HER2) receptors is associated with sharply decreased survival in high grade serous ovarian cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 4754.

Objective. To evaluate ovarian cancer stem cells as predictors of survival we analyzed associations of cancer stem cell markers ALDH1, CD117 and CD133 with survival outcomes among patients with high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGS OvCa). Methods. Data from HGS OvCa patients who were surgically staged prior to treatment with IP (n = 90) or IV-only (n = 398) chemotherapy was obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas. Multivariate Cox proportional-hazards regression tested associations of tumor mRNA expression of 5 cancer stem cell markers with progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Expression was analyzed as a continuous variable by restricted mean survival (RMS) analysis. Mean PFS or OS were compared between IP and IV groups by permutation testing stratified by expression. P-values were two-tailed. Results. Increased tumor ALDH1A2 expression was associated with decreased OS among patients treated with IP chemotherapy, HR 2.36 (1.16-4.80), p = 0.017. IP treated patients with upper 20th percentile ALDH1A2 expression had decreased OS compared to bottom 20th percentile expression (30.4 versus 51.1 months, -20.7 months difference, p = 0.017). RMS curves for PFS and OS of IP versus IV treated patients crossed at high ALDH1A2 expression, indicating that IP treated patients had decreased survival compared to IV-only treated patients. Patients with upper 20th percentile ALDH1A2 expression treated with IP versus IV-only chemotherapy had no difference in mean PFS (21.3 versus 21.6 months, -0.3 months difference, p = 0.67) and decreased OS (30.4 versus 35.3 months, -4.9 months difference, p < 0.0001). Upper 10th percentile ALDH1A2 expression was associated with decreased PFS (19.5 versus 22.0 months, -2.5 months, p = 0.005) and OS (27.1 versus 35.2 months, -8.1 months, p < 0.0001) comparing IP versus IV groups. Increased CD133 expression was associated with increased PFS among IV-only patients, HR 0.85 (0.74-0.97), p = 0.016. CD117 and the ALDH1 genes ALDH1A1/3 were not associated with survival. Conclusions. High primary tumor ALDH1A2 expression was independently associated with significantly decreased OS among patients treated with IP chemotherapy. High ALDH1A2 was associated with lack of benefit or decreased survival among patients treated with IP compared to IV-only adjuvant chemotherapy. Citation Format: Brandon-Luke L. Seagle, Monica Dandapani, Chen Hui Luo, Claire Hoppenot, Robert Samuelson, Kevin H. Eng, Kunle Odunsi, Shohreh Shahabi. Ovarian cancer stem cell marker ALDH1A2 is a candidate biomarker for patient selection for intraperitoneal chemotherapy. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 4753.