Search

Herpes zoster (HZ) is a frequent complication after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). The option of zoster prophylaxis with an antiviral drug is described in the literature, but there is no consensus on the drug and the dosage.We analyzed the records of 310 patients treated with ASCT who were controlled regularly regarding HZ inter alia for at least 24 months following ASCT. Since 01/2015 patients received prophylactic low-dose acyclovir (400 mg per day) during the first 12 months following discharge after ASCT (n = 107).Twenty percent of patients without this kind of prophylaxis and 2.8% of patients with prophylaxis developed HZ (p .001). No patient with this prophylaxis developed HZ in the first year after ASCT, 2.8% of patients in the second year after ASCT. A prognostic factor was the kind of diagnosis: 30% of lymphoma patients and 14% of myeloma patients developed HZ in the first 24 months after ASCT without prophylaxis, but only 6.3% and 0% of patients with prophylaxis, respectively. Neither an increase of HZ cases following prophylaxis nor acyclovir refractory HZ cases were observed.Zoster prophylaxis with low-dose acyclovir over 12 months after ASCT is effective and well tolerated.

Study drug dosing

Supplementary Appendix

Purpose Treosulfan and fludarabine (Treo/Flu) were successfully introduced into toxicity-reduced conditioning for SCT. However, the risk of post-SCT relapse remains a matter of concern. We report the results of a novel individual treatment approach with Treo/Flu and cytarabine (Treo/Flu/AraC) conditioning prior to allogeneic SCT in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), or myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). Methods Seventy-seven patients (median age 54 years) at high risk of disease relapse due to unfavorable cytogenetics or failure to achieve complete remission prior to SCT were included. Median follow-up was 3.2 years. Results The 1-, 2- and 3-year RFS rates were 49.4%, 41.7%, and 37.6% and OS rates were 59.3%, 49.3%, and 45.4%, respectively. Cumulative incidence of NRM was 10% at 100 days, 18.8% at 1 year and 20.1% at 2 years. The cumulative incidence of relapse increased from 31% at 1 year to 38.5% after 3 years. The cumulative incidences of engraftment, chimerism, graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) and toxicities were acceptable and comparable with similar patients conditioned with Treo/Flu or FLAMSA-RIC. Conclusion In conclusion, Treo/Flu/AraC provides tolerable, feasible, and effective conditioning for patients with AML, MDS or MPN, even in advanced disease states. The incidence of NRM and relapse is acceptable in this heavily pre-treated population with high-risk disease. Future research will aim to confirm these initial findings and include a larger number of participants in a prospective trial.

OBJECTIVE To contribute data on long-term outcome and potential curative impact of ASCT in FL, especially following HDT with the BEAM protocol (BCNU, etoposide, cytarabine and melphalan), given very limited data on this topic in the literature. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with FL (n = 76) were treated in our institution with HDT and ASCT. In the case of long-term remission (≥8 years), peripheral blood was tested for minimal residual disease by t(14;18)- and IGH-PCR, including the last follow-up. RESULTS 10-year overall survival, progression-free survival, and freedom from progression (FFP) after first-line ASCT (n = 20) were 80%, 60%, and 69%, after second-line ASCT (n = 48, following BEAM) 66%, 38%, and 41%, after third/fourth-line ASCT (n = 8) 33%, 25%, and 25%, respectively. Prognostic factors for FFP were treatment line and FLIPI (Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index). 10-year FFP for second-line ASCT and low-risk FLIPI at relapse was 69%, intermediate-risk 28%, and high-risk 25% (P

Colorectal cancer is a clinically and molecularly heterogeneous disease. Currently, extended RAS and BRAF mutation testing is obligatory in routine clinical practice before starting any treatment in the metastatic setting. Treatment decision making also includes assessment of the clinical condition of the patient, definition of the treatment goal, and consideration of the primary tumor site. Biological treatment is part of the first-line drug combination unless contraindicated. Mutational status is significantly associated with the outcome of patients and is strongly predictive for anti-EGFR-targeted therapy. The prognosis of RAS mutant CRC is clearly inferior to wild-type cases. RAS remains an elusive target, and specific treatment options are not yet available. Recently, promising results of a direct KRAS G12C inhibitor have been reported; however, further confirmation is needed. The biomarker landscape in mCRC is evolving; new promising markers are awaited with the chance of more precise targeted treatment.

ObjectiveOpioid-induced constipation (OIC) is a frequent adverse event among patients receiving chronic pain therapy that is requiring opioids. Naldemedine was approved by the Food and Drug Administration to treat OIC and appears to be more efficient than any other peripherally acting µ-opioid receptor antagonist. This meta-analysis aimed at assessing the available data on naldemedine in terms of efficacy.MethodsWe searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed and ClinicalTrials on 24 May 2022 to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing naldemedine to placebo among patients reporting OIC.ResultsEvaluation of 6 RCTs enrolling 2769 participants showed significantly greater respondence to treatment (OR=2.48; 95% CI: 2.02 to 3.06; pConclusionsNaldemedine improves a variety of bowel function parameters while preserving analgesia, confirming its efficacy for patients with OIC. However, head-to-head trials are needed to establish naldemedine as treatment of first choice for laxative-refractory OIC.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42022281353.

The prognosis of an early relapse of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) appears to be poor following autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). The aim of this study is to contribute data to the open question on whether additional radiotherapy can improve the outcome. Forty-eight patients with an early relapse (median 4 months after the end of initial immunochemotherapy, range 1–11) of DLBCL have been treated in our institution with high-dose therapy (usually the BEAM protocol) and ASCT since 2008 (median age 61 years, range 28–73). Twenty-three patients received ASCT in a second treatment line, 25 in a third line (19 refractory to second-line salvage therapy, 5 after second relapse). Fifteen of these 48 patients received radiotherapy (36–50 Gy, median 40) of residual masses after ASCT. Three-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) after second-line ASCT were 61 and 57%, after third-line ASCT 47 and 44%, respectively, without significant differences. A prognostic factor was the International Prognostic Index (IPI) at the start of salvage therapy. Three-year OS and PFS in low-risk patients were 69 and 69%, in low-intermediate-risk 63 and 53%, and in high-intermediate-risk 23 and 23%, respectively (p = 0.033). Twenty-three patients achieved a sustained complete remission (13–146 months, median 62). Sustained long-term remissions can be achieved in patients with early relapse of DLBCL following ASCT in a second or third treatment line, particularly in patients with low- and low-intermediate-risk IPI, following radiotherapy of residual disease after ASCT. Further investigations are required to clarify which patients need an alternative therapy (potentially CAR T‑cells or allogeneic transplantation).

Background Patients with carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) have a dismal prognosis, even when treated with multi-agent chemotherapy. We hypothesised that adding the epidermal growth-factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor cetuximab to standard first-line chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin would improve PFS and RR in unfavourable CUP. Methods This open-labelled, multicentre Phase 2 study included patients with unfavourable, untreated adeno- or undifferentiated CUP. Patients were randomised to receive either paclitaxel/carboplatin (group A) or paclitaxel/carboplatin plus cetuximab (group B) every 3 weeks for a maximum of 6 cycles followed by cetuximab maintenance in group B. The primary endpoint was PFS in the two groups. Secondary endpoints were RR, toxicity and overall survival (OS). Results One-hundred-and-fifty patients were randomised (group A = 72, group B = 78). The median PFS and OS for all patients were 3.8 and 8.1 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.9–4.8 and 6.8–9.5). There was no significant difference in PFS (3.7 vs 4.6 months, HR 0.98) or OS (8.1 vs 7.4, HR 1.1) between the two treatment groups. Response rate tended to be better for chemotherapy plus cetuximab compared to chemotherapy alone (22% vs 15%). Adverse events grade ≥3 were comparable between the two groups, except for significantly increased skin toxicity in the cetuximab arm. Conclusions Cetuximab plus paclitaxel/carboplatin did not improve PFS, OS and RR in metastatic CUP compared to paclitaxel/carboplatin alone. Addition of cetuximab resulted in additional skin toxicity. Clinical trial registration The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00894569.

Background: 5-Fluorouracil (FU) is one of the most commonly used cytostatic drugs in the systemic treatment of cancer. Treatment with FU may cause severe or life-threatening side effects and the treatment-related mortality rate is 0.2–1.0%. Summary: Among other risk factors associated with increased toxicity, a genetic deficiency in dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), an enzyme responsible for the metabolism of FU, is well known. This is due to variants in the DPD gene (DPYD). Up to 9% of European patients carry a DPD gene variant that decreases enzyme activity, and DPD is completely lacking in approximately 0.5% of patients. Here we describe the clinical and genetic background and summarize recommendations for the genetic testing and tailoring of treatment with 5-FU derivatives. The statement was developed as a consensus statement organized by the German Society for Hematology and Medical Oncology in cooperation with 13 medical associations from Austria, Germany, and Switzerland. Key Messages: (i) Patients should be tested for the 4 most common genetic DPYD variants before treatment with drugs containing FU. (ii) Testing forms the basis for a differentiated, risk-adapted algorithm with recommendations for treatment with FU-containing drugs. (iii) Testing may optionally be supplemented by therapeutic drug monitoring.

Importance Total neoadjuvant therapy has been increasingly adopted for multimodal rectal cancer treatment. The optimal sequence of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and chemotherapy needs to be established. Objective To report the long-term results of the secondary end points prespecified in the Randomized Phase 2 Trial of Chemoradiotherapy Plus Induction or Consolidation Chemotherapy as Total Neoadjuvant Therapy (CAO/ARO/AIO-12 trial) for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants This secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial included 311 patients who were recruited from the accrued CAO/ARO/AIO-12 trial population from June 15, 2015, to January 31, 2018, from 18 centers in Germany. Patients with cT3-4 and/or node-positive rectal adenocarcinoma were included in the analysis. Data were analyzed from June 15, 2015, to January 31, 2018. The follow-up analysis was conducted between January 31, 2018, and November 30, 2020. Interventions Patients were randomly assigned to group A for 3 cycles of fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin before fluorouracil/oxaliplatin CRT (50.4 Gy), or to group B for CRT before chemotherapy. Total mesorectal excision was scheduled on day 123 after the start of total neoadjuvant therapy in both groups. Main Outcomes and Measures The end points assessed in this secondary analysis included long-term oncologic outcomes, chronic toxicity, patient-reported outcome measures for global health status (GHS) and quality of life (QoL), and the Wexner stool incontinence score. Results Of the 311 patients enrolled, 306 were evaluable, including 156 in group A (mean [SD] age, 60 [11] years; 106 men [68%]) and 150 in group B (mean [SD] age, 62 [10] years; 100 men [67%]). After a median follow-up of 43 months (range, 35-60 months), the 3-year disease-free survival was 73% in both groups (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.63-1.45,P = .82); the 3-year cumulative incidence of locoregional recurrence (6% vs 5%,P = .67) and distant metastases (18% vs 16%,P = .52) were not significantly different. Chronic toxicity grade 3 to 4 occurred in 10 of 85 patients (11.8%) in group A and 8 of 66 patients (9.9%) in group B at 3 years. The GHS/QoL score decreased after total mesorectal excision but returned to pretreatment levels 1 year after randomization with no difference between the groups. Stool incontinence deteriorated 1 year after randomization in both groups and only improved slightly at 3 years, but never reached baseline levels. Conclusions and Relevance This secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial showed that CRT followed by chemotherapy resulted in higher pathological complete response without compromising disease-free survival, toxicity, QoL, or stool incontinence and is thus proposed as the preferred total neoadjuvant therapy sequence if organ preservation is a priority. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier:NCT02363374

Purpose: The BRCA1-like profile identifies tumors with a defect in homologous recombination due to inactivation of BRCA1. This profile has been shown to predict which stage III breast cancer patients benefit from myeloablative, DNA double-strand-break-inducing chemotherapy. We tested the predictive potential of the BRCA1-like profile for adjuvant non-myeloablative, intensified dose-dense chemotherapy in the GAIN trial. Methods: Lymph node positive breast cancer patients were randomized to 3 × 3 dose-dense cycles of intensified epirubicin, paclitaxel, and cyclophosphamide (ETC) or 4 cycles concurrent epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by 10 cycles of weekly paclitaxel combined with 4 cycles capecitabine (EC-TX). Only triple negative breast cancer patients (TNBC) for whom tissue was available were included in these planned analyses. BRCA1-like or non-BRCA1-like copy number profiles were derived from low coverage sequencing data. Results: 119 out of 163 TNBC patients (73%) had a BRCA1-like profile. After median follow-up of 83 months, disease free survival (DFS) was not significantly different between BRCA1-like and non-BRCA1-like patients [adjusted hazard ratio (adj.HR) 1.02; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55–1.86], neither was overall survival (OS; adj.HR 1.26; 95% CI 0.58–2.71). When split by BRCA1-like status, DFS and OS were not significantly different between treatments. However, EC-TX seemed to result in a trend to an improvement in DFS in patients with a BRCA1-like tumor, while the reverse accounted for ETC treatment in patients with a non-BRCA1-like tumor (p for interaction = 0.094). Conclusions: The BRCA1-like profile is not associated with survival benefit for a non-myeloablative, intensified regimen in this study population. Considering the limited cohort size, capecitabine might have additional benefit for TNBC patients.

Background: The emergence of the COVID-19 virus in 2020 led to unprecedented challenges in the way oncologic care is organized to guarantee treatment continuation for patients with cancer. The SCOPE COVID-19 survey aimed to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on third-line treatment goals in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and compare it with daily practice patterns from the pre–COVID-19 era. Methods: An expert panel of gastrointestinal oncologists developed the survey, which was undertaken between October 2020–January 2021. Questions were designed to evaluate the practice patterns during this time and assess the future impact of COVID-19 on treatment decisions. The survey was conducted online using FocusVision Decipher. Oncologists from 14 countries, the majority of which were in Europe, participated. Results: As of 31 January 2021, there were 228 respondents. The majority were medical oncologists (89%), aged between 35–55 years (62%), practiced in a university hospital (49%), and saw between 10–29 patients with mCRC/month (53%). Overall, few restrictions affecting cancer patient management, such as staff being redeployed, were reported by the majority of oncologists (84%). That said, there were a number of changes to practice patterns: the most frequent were a reduction in the number of hospital visits (83%), increased use of virtual consultations/telemedicine (82%), increased frequency of prescribing oral versus intravenous (IV) treatments (73%), and an increase in follow-up/monitoring procedures done closer to home (73%). The third-line treatment goals remained similar to the pre-COVID era;preserving quality of life remained the singular most common primary goal (36%), while 42% of respondents cited efficacy-focused goals, such as prolonging overall survival and improving progression-free survival as their main aim. Overall, 93% of oncologists opined that treatment decisions over the next 12 months will be influenced by the pandemic. While 86% predicted a return to normal for the initial visits for new patients, thereafter and for ongoing patients, 83% foresee that there will be a continued increase in the use of virtual consultations/telemedicine, 80% envision reduced frequency of hospital visits, and 74% foresee the increased frequency of prescribing oral versus IV treatments to be maintained, as well as follow-up being undertaken closer to home. In total, 40% of oncologists believe that the changes to existing protocols, incurred as a result of the pandemic, will be in effect for at least a year. Conclusions: The main third-line treatment goals for patients with mCRC remained the same during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, there were changes to the daily practice patterns. There was an increased use of oral versus IV therapies, and more follow-up and monitoring procedures were undertaken closer to home. Patients visited hospitals less frequently, with a shift toward virtual consultations/telemedicine, practices that are thought to continue for the foreseeable future. The latter observation suggests there is a need to further develop and invest in all aspects of digital health. Editorial acknowledgement: Medical writing support was provided by Joanne Franklin, PhD, CMPP, from Aptitude Health, The Hague, the Netherlands, and funded by Les Laboratoires Servier, France. Legal entity responsible for the study: The authors. Funding: Les Laboratoires Servier, France. Disclosure: G. Prager: Advisory / Consultancy: Merck, Roche, Amgen, Sanofi, Lilly, Bayer, Servier, Taiho, CECOG, MSD, BMS, Pierre Fabre. F. Rivera Herrero: Honoraria (Institution): Roche, Merck-Serono, Amgen, Sanofi, MSD, BMS, Servier;Advisory / Consultancy: Roche, Merck-Serono, Amgen, Sanofi, MSD, BMS, Servier;Research grant / Funding (self): Roche, Merck-Serono, Amgen, Sanofi, MSD, BMS, Servier;Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche, Merck-Serono, Amgen, Sanofi, MSD, BMS, Servier. H. Wasan: Honoraria (self): Servier, Incyte, Pierre Farbre;Advisory / Consultancy: Servier, Incyte, Pierre Farbre;Speaker Bure u / Expert testimony: Servier, Incyte, Pierre Farbre;Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer, Sirtex;Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Servier, Incyte, Pierre Farbre. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

We evaluated the impact of salvage regimens and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with induction failure. Between 1993 and 2009, 3324 patients with newly diagnosed AML were enrolled in 5 prospective treatment trials of the German-Austrian AML Study Group. After first induction therapy with idarubicin, cytarabine and etoposide (ICE), 845 patients had refractory disease. In addition, 180 patients, although responding to first induction, relapsed after second induction therapy. Of the 1025 patients with induction failure, 875 (median age 55 years) received intensive salvage therapy: 7+3-based (n=59), high-dose cytarabine combined with mitoxantrone (HAM; n=150), with all-trans retinoic acid (A; A-HAM) (n=247), with gemtuzumab ozogamicin and A (GO; GO-A-HAM) (n=140), other intensive regimens (n=165), experimental treatment (n=27) and direct allo-HCT (n=87). In patients receiving intensive salvage chemotherapy (n=761), response (complete remission/complete remission with incomplete hematological recovery (CR/CRi)) was associated with GO-A-HAM treatment (odds ratio (OR), 1.93; P=0.002), high-risk cytogenetics (OR, 0.62; P=0.006) and age (OR for a 10-year difference, 0.75; P

Background: To investigate tumour biomarker status and efficacy of first-line panitumumab+FOLFIRI for metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC). Methods: 154 patients received first-line panitumumab + FOLFIRI every 14 days. Primary end point was objective response rate (ORR). Data were analysed by tumour RAS (KRAS/NRAS) and BRAF status, and baseline amphiregulin (AREG) expression. Results: Objective responses occurred more frequently in RAS wild type (WT) (59%) vs RAS mutant (MT) (41%) mCRC and in RAS WT/BRAF WT (68%) vs RAS or BRAF MT (37%) disease. Median response duration was longer in RAS WT (13.0 months) vs RAS MT (5.8 months) (hazard ratio (HR): 0.16). Median progression-free survival was longer in RAS WT vs MT (11.2 vs 7.3 months; HR, 0.37) and was also longer in RAS WT/BRAF WT vs RAS or BRAF MT (13.2 vs 6.9 months; HR, 0.25). Incidence of adverse events was similar regardless of RAS/BRAF status, and no new safety signals were noted. Among patients with RAS WT tumours, ORR was 67% with high AREG expression and 38% with low AREG expression. Conclusions: First-line panitumumab+FOLFIRI was associated with favourable efficacy in patients with RAS WT and RAS WT/BRAF WT vs MT mCRC tumours and was well tolerated.

Immune cell infiltration in breast cancer is important for the patient's prognosis and response to systemic therapies including immunotherapy. We sought to investigate the prevalence of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and their association with immune checkpoints such as programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) in high-risk, node-positive breast cancer of the adjuvant German Adjuvant Intergroup Node-positive (GAIN-1) trial.We evaluated TILs by haematoxylin and eosin staining and PD-1 and PD-L1 (SP263 assay) expression by immunohistochemistry in 1318 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded breast carcinomas. The association of TILs with PD-1, PD-L1, molecular intrinsic subtypes, outcome and therapy regimens (dose-dense [dd] epirubicin, paclitaxel and cyclophosphamide [EPC] and dd epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, paclitaxel and capecitabine [EC-PwX]) was statistically tested.Overall TILs density was significantly associated with the expression of PD-1 and PD-L1 in immune cells (each p 0.0001) and PD-L1 in tumour cells (p = 0.0051). TILs were more common in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive tumours (each p 0.0001). On multivariate Cox regression analyses, patients with breast cancer without TILs had an unfavourable disease-free survival (DFS) in the EPC arm compared with the EC-PwX arm (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.69 [0.44-1.06], p = 0.0915); but no differences were seen in tumours with TILs (HR = 1.24 [0.92-1.67], p = 0.1566, interaction p = 0.0336). PD-1-positive immune cells in TNBC were associated with a significantly better DFS (HR = 0.50 [0.25-0.99], p = 0.0457). PD-L1 expression had no impact on patient outcome.TILs predict the benefit of intensified ddEPC compared with ddEC-PwX therapy in node-positive, high-risk breast cancer. TILs, PD-1 and PD-L1 are linked to each other indicating tumour immunogenicity. Moreover, PD-1-positive immune cells have a positive prognostic impact in TNBC.NCT00196872.

4024 Background: EGFR based combinations and the triplet combination FOLFOXIRI are known to increase response rates compared to doublet combinations. Methods: Patients with colorectal cancer and non-resectable liver metastases were enrolled into the trial. RAS wild type patients were randomised to cetuximab/FOLFIRI or cetuximab/FOLFOXIRI, RAS/BRAF mutant patients were randomised to FOLFOXIRI with or without bevacizumab. The primary endpoint was response. Secondary endpoints included progression free and overall survival. The trial was closed early due to poor recruitment. Results: Between 2014 and 2018, ninety-two pts were enrolled into the study. 54 wild type pts were randomised into cetuximab based treatment with (28 pts) or without (26 pts) oxaliplatin, 38 RAS/BRAF mutant pts were randomised to receive FOLFOXIRI alone (18 pts) or plus bevacizumab (16 pts). Objective response was achieved in 21/26 pts (81 % [95 CI: 61 – 93 %]) with cet/FOLFIRI, 24/28 pts (86 % [95 CI: 67 – 96 %]) with cet / FOLFOXIRI, 13/1 8 pts (72 % [95 CI: 46 – 90 %]) with FOLFOXIRI and 14/20 pts (70 % [95 CI: 46 – 88 %]) with bev/FOLFOXIRI. Two pts with cet/FOLFOXIRI and one pat with FOLFOXIRI achieved CR according to imaging. The median PFS was 12.7 [95 % CI: 7.2 – 18.2], 15.0 [95 % CI: 11.3 – 18.7], 17.5 [95 % CI: 8.0 – 27.1] and 15.0 [95 % CI: 11.4 – 18.5] months with cet/FOLFIRI, cet/FOLFOXIRI, FOLFOXIRI and bev/FOLFOXIRI. The median overall survival was 42 mo. [95 % CI: 28 – 55], 55 [95 % CI:41 – 68], 28 [95 % CI: 22 – 36] and 44 [95 % CI: 0 – 94] months with cet/FOLFIRI, cet/FOLFOXIRI, FOLFOXIRI and bev/FOLFOXIRI. The frequency of grade ≥ 3 toxicity per arm (cet/FOLFIRI, cet/FOLFOXIRI, FOLFOXIRI and bev/FOLFOXIRI) was 29 %, 46 %, 56 %. 45 % for neutropenia/leukopenia, 11 %, 12 %, 28 %, 25 % for diarrhea and 29 %, 19 %, 6 % and 5 % for skin toxicities. Conclusions: High response rates were observed in patients with colorectal liver metastases with all regimens. The numerically highest response rate was observed in RAS wild type patients treated with cetuximab/FOLFOXIRI. Clinical trial information: NCT01802645 .

Introduction: Since late 1990’s therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients has changed considerable, and the combination of doublet or triplet chemotherapy and a targeted agent are now routinely used. With the introduction of more intensified regimens, it has become even more important to identify patients that will benefit from and can tolerate therapy. Furthermore, the increasing understanding of the biology of mCRC has led to the discovery of new potential targets. Therefore, therapy of patients with mCRC has undergone considerable change from ‘one strategy fits all’ towards a more personalized therapy. Areas covered: We present an overview of the recent literature on approved systemic treatment of mCRC however with focus on how the treatment strategy has changed based on clinical and molecular parameters that presently are used routinely in the clinical situation. Expert commentary: The face of treatment of mCRC has changed from ‘one strategy fits all’ to a personalized approach in which both clinical, molecular parameters and the aim of therapy have to be taking into account when planning the optimal treatment strategy for the individual mCRC patient.

Objective Data from a trial of first-line panitumumab plus FOLFIRI (folinic acid, infusional 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan) in metastatic colorectal cancer were retrospectively analysed to investigate the effects of primary tumour location and early tumour shrinkage on outcomes. Methods Patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer from a single-arm, open-label phase II study (NCT00508404) were included. Tumours located from the splenic flexure to rectum and in the caecum to transverse colon were defined as left- and right-sided, respectively. Baseline characteristics were summarised by primary tumour location and the effects of primary tumour location on outcomes—including objective response rate, resection rate, depth of response, duration of response and progression-free survival—were analysed. Progression-free survival and objective response rate were analysed by early tumour shrinkage status. Results Primary tumour location was determined in 52/69 (75%) patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer; 45 (87%) had left-sided disease. Median progression-free survival was longer in patients with left-sided tumours (11.2 vs. 7.2 months for right-sided disease) and more of these patients experienced early tumour shrinkage ≥ 30% (53% vs. 29%). Early tumour shrinkage ≥ 30% was associated with improved progression-free survival irrespective of tumour location. More patients with early tumour shrinkage ≥ 30% achieved a partial or complete response. Objective response rate, duration of response, depth of response and resection rates were similar in patients with left- and right-sided tumours. Conclusions This analysis has confirmed a prognostic effect of primary tumour location in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer receiving first-line panitumumab plus FOLFIRI. Early tumour shrinkage was associated with improved progression-free survival irrespective of tumour location. In right-sided disease, early tumour shrinkage may identify a subgroup of patients who might respond to panitumumab. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00508404.

Standard first-line therapy of chronic myeloid leukemia is treatment with imatinib. In the randomized German Chronic Myeloid Leukemia-Study IV, more potent BCR-ABL inhibition with 800 mg ('high-dose') imatinib accelerated achievement of a deep molecular remission. However, whether and when a de-escalation of the dose intensity under high-dose imatinib can be safely performed without increasing the risk of losing deep molecular response is unknown. To gain insights into this clinically relevant question, we analyzed the outcome of imatinib dose reductions from 800 mg to 400 mg daily in the Chronic Myeloid Leukemia-Study IV. Of the 422 patients that were randomized to the 800 mg arm, 68 reduced imatinib to 400 mg after they had achieved at least a stable major molecular response. Of these 68 patients, 61 (90%) maintained major molecular remission on imatinib at 400 mg. Five of the seven patients who lost major molecular remission on the imatinib standard dose regained major molecular remission while still on 400 mg imatinib. Only two of 68 patients had to switch to more potent kinase inhibition to regain major molecular remission. Importantly, the lengths of the intervals between imatinib high-dose treatment before and after achieving major molecular remission were associated with the probabilities of maintaining major molecular remission with the standard dose of imatinib. Taken together, the data support the view that a deep molecular remission achieved with high-dose imatinib can be safely maintained with standard dose in most patients. Study protocol registered at clinicaltrials.gov 00055874.

There is a need to identify patients who may benefit from particular treatments. We investigated prognosis in 915 patients with mCRC from 2 phase III trials of panitumumab plus chemotherapy, based on Kohne category and BRAF status. Both Kohne category and BRAF status predicted outcomes in terms of PFS and OS, and panitumumab provided benefits over chemotherapy alone. Background: Kohne prognostic score is used to classify patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) as high, intermediate, or low risk. Using data from 2 phase III trials, we analyzed survival in patients categorized according to Kohne prognostic category and virus-induced rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B (BRAF) mutation. Patients and Methods: PRIME (Panitumumab Randomized Trial In Combination With Chemotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer to Determine Efficacy) (first-line) and 20050181 (second-line) were studies of chemotherapy with or without panitumumab. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed retrospectively in rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (RAS) wild type (WT) and RAS WT+BRAF WT mCRC in each Kohne category, and in BRAF mutant (MT) mCRC. Results: In PRIME (n = 495) and 20050181 (n = 420), 53 (11%) and 44 (10%) patients, respectively, had BRAF MT mCRC. Of the RAS WT+BRAF WT/unknown populations, 85/267/90 and 82/211/83 were categorized as high/medium/low risk, respectively. PFS and OS hazard ratios (HRs), adjusted for Kohne group, for patients with RAS WT + BRAF WT/unknown mCRC favored panitumumab with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in both studies. In PRIME, the PFS HR was 0.74 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-0.90) and OS HR was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.64-0.95). In 20050181, PFS and OS HRs were 0.80 (95% CI, 0.65-0.99) and 0.78 (95% CI, 0.62-0.99), respectively. Median PFS and OS were lower in patients with BRAF MT mCRC than in any of the 3 risk categories for patients with RAS WT+BRAF WT/unknown mCRC. Conclusion: During first- and second-line treatment, Kohne prognostic score allows accurate risk classification in RAS WT mCRC. BRAF MT mCRC should be classified as high risk regardless of other parameters. Panitumumab with chemotherapy might provide survival benefits versus chemotherapy alone in RAS WT and RAS WT+BRAF WT/unknown mCRC, overall and across risk categories. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.

705 Background: Using sunitinib (SUN) as the comparator, two out of three recent phase III clinical trials have shown an overall survival (OS) benefit in the alternative treatment arm (Checkmate 214 (C), Keynote 426 (K)). The Javelin 101(J) trial has yet to show a significant improvement. Methods: A cross-study comparison of OS for the sunitinib arms of C, K and J was carried out. Special focus was given to risk group stratification and subsequent therapies. Data from the SUN pivotal trial (SP) was also taken into account. Results: Across the C, K and SP trials, OS was similar at approximately 78%. Despite a lower percentage of favourable risk patients compared to K and SP, an OS of 82% was observed in J. At 18 months, OS survival curves split ranging from 65% ©, 72.1% (K) to 76% (J). OS in the SUN arm in J at 18 months was comparable to OS of Nivolumab/Ipilimumab in C (78%). The rate of subsequent therapies ranged from 34.3% (K), 39.2% (J) to 54% (C) in the SUN arms. At the time of the SP trial almost no subsequent therapy options existed. In the experimental arms, the rate of subsequent therapies was 51.8% ©, 20.5% (K) and 20.8% (J). The existing data give no clear evidence of a correlation between subsequent therapies and OS. However, an analysis of the subsequent therapies/patients discontinuing therapy ratio (ST/DIS) and type of subsequent therapy (PD1/L1 directed or therapy with proven OS benefit (pOS) in randomized trials) in the SUN arms may be more conclusive (see table). The rate of subsequent therapies (ST/DIS) as well as PD(L)1 or pOS therapies were highest in J, followed by K and C. Conclusions: Despite the difficulties of a cross trial comparison, this data should raise awareness of the influence of a more intense subsequent therapy. It points to the necessity to standardize subsequent therapies in 1st line trials if OS is a primary study aim. Given this analysis, it may be pertinent to ask if an optimal or near optimal subsequent therapy following SUN might be equal to a 1st line IO/IO therapy with regards to OS.[Table: see text]

ABSTRACT The VEGF- (bevacizumab) and EGFR- (cetuximab and panitumumab) targeting monoclonal antibodies have become integral components of the first-line treatment strategies for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Increasingly combination chemotherapy, with or without a targeted agent, is being used to facilitate curative liver resection and improve survival rates in patients with initially unresectable but potentially resectable mCRC. Currently, the only selective marker for the treatment of patients with mCRC is tumor RAS mutational status. BRAF status is a strong prognostic indicator. Medical and clinical oncologists from Central Asia, Russia, the Middle East, Africa and Turkey reviewed data for the use of targeted agents in the treatment of patients with mCRC and have formed recommendations for the biological of choice first-line for patients with mCRC.

Long-term clinical and molecular remissions in patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) following high-dose therapy (HDT) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) have been evaluated in only a few studies. Thirty-six patients with MCL received ASCT in our institution (27 patients undergoing first-line therapy, 8 patients undergoing second-line therapy, and 1 patient undergoing third-line therapy). In the case of long-term remission (≥5 years; n = 8), peripheral blood was tested for minimal residual disease (MRD) by t(11; 14) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and immunoglobulin heavy-chain (IGH) PCR at the last follow-up. Ten-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and freedom from progression (FFP) after first-line ASCT were 42 %, 43 %, and 54 %; after second-line ASCT, these were all 0 %. Four-year OS, PFS, and FFP for the first-line cohort were 75 %, 48 %, and 61 %, respectively. Four-year OS, PFS, and FFP after second-line ASCT were 55 %, 30 %, and 30 %, respectively. Treatment-related mortality (3 months after ASCT) was 0 %. The only prognostic factor for OS, PFS, and FFP was treatment line (p = 0.011, p = 0.046, and p = 0.023, respectively). No relapses occurred after 5 years following ASCT. So far, eight patients developed sustained long-term clinical and molecular complete remissions of up to 14.6 years following ASCT in the first treatment line. Sustained long-term clinical and molecular remissions can be achieved following ASCT in the first treatment line and apparently less frequent in the second treatment line.

Incidence and prognostic impact of ASXL2 mutations in adult acute myeloid leukemia patients with t(8;21)(q22;q22): a study of the German-Austrian AML Study Group

In this study, we evaluated the impact of secondary genetic lesions in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with inv(16)(p13.1q22) or t(16;16)(p13.1;q22); CBFB-MYH11. We studied 176 patients, all enrolled on prospective treatment trials, for secondary chromosomal aberrations and mutations in N-/KRAS, KIT, FLT3, and JAK2 (V617F) genes. Most frequent chromosomal aberrations were trisomy 22 (18%) and trisomy 8 (16%). Overall, 84% of patients harbored at least 1 gene mutation, with RAS being affected in 53% (45% NRAS; 13% KRAS) of the cases, followed by KIT (37%) and FLT3 (17%; FLT3-TKD [14%], FLT3-ITD [5%]). None of the secondary genetic lesions influenced achievement of complete remission. In multivariable analyses, KIT mutation (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.67; P = .04], log10(WBC) (HR = 1.33; P = .02), and trisomy 22 (HR = 0.54; P = .08) were relevant factors for relapse-free survival; for overall survival, FLT3 mutation (HR = 2.56; P = .006), trisomy 22 (HR = 0.45; P = .07), trisomy 8 (HR = 2.26; P = .02), age (difference of 10 years, HR = 1.46; P = .01), and therapy-related AML (HR = 2.13; P = .14) revealed as prognostic factors. The adverse effects of KIT and FLT3 mutations were mainly attributed to exon 8 and tyrosine kinase domain mutations, respectively. Our large study emphasizes the impact of both secondary chromosomal aberrations as well as gene mutations for outcome in AML with inv(16)/t (16;16).

BackgroundIn the CRYSTAL study adding cetuximab to first-line FOLFIRI significantly improved outcome in patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer. Quality of life (QoL) was assessed, and associations with tumour response and survival were investigated.Patients and methodsThe European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL questionnaire-core 30 was used, focusing on global health status (GHS)/QoL and social functioning scales. Radiological response was assessed by an independent review committee.ResultsQoL was evaluable in 627/666 patients (94%) with KRAS wild-type tumours; of these 52% received FOLFIRI, and 48% FOLFIRI plus cetuximab. Pattern mixture analysis revealed no significant differences for GHS/QoL (P=0.12) and social functioning scores (P=0.43) between the treatment arms. In additional analyses: early skin reactions in patients receiving cetuximab did not significantly affect these QoL scales, and tumour response was more common (58% versus 40%, P=0.0002) and survival longer (Hazard ratio 1.68, P

Vinflunine (VFL) has been approved in Europe for second-line treatment of metastatic and advanced urothelial cancer after failure of platin-containing therapy. Since approval, the drug has been investigated in few clinical trials. Most of the currently available reports describe experiences with VFL in a daily clinical setting. This review gives a short overview on clinical experiences and clinical trials involving VFL since the approval of this drug in 2009.

We evaluated the frequency, genetic architecture, clinico-pathologic features and prognostic impact of RUNX1 mutations in 2439 adult patients with newly-diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). RUNX1 mutations were found in 245 of 2439 (10%) patients; were almost mutually exclusive of AML with recurrent genetic abnormalities; and they co-occurred with a complex pattern of gene mutations, frequently involving mutations in epigenetic modifiers (ASXL1, IDH2, KMT2A, EZH2), components of the spliceosome complex (SRSF2, SF3B1) and STAG2, PHF6, BCOR. RUNX1 mutations were associated with older age (16-59 years: 8.5%; ⩾60 years: 15.1%), male gender, more immature morphology and secondary AML evolving from myelodysplastic syndrome. In univariable analyses, RUNX1 mutations were associated with inferior event-free (EFS, P

Clinical impact of GATA2 mutations in acute myeloid leukemia patients harboring CEBPA mutations: a study of the AML study group

Purpose Uncertainty exists about whether elderly patients benefit to the same extent as younger patients from combination therapy with irinotecan in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Patients and Methods Combined analysis was carried out with source data from the fluorouracil (FU)/folinic acid (FA) and the irinotecan/FU/FA arms of four first-line, phase III trials of CRC to investigate the efficacy and safety of combination and monotherapy in elderly (age ≥ 70 years; n = 599) compared with younger (age < 70 years; n = 2,092) patients. Results Response rates were improved with irinotecan-based combination therapy compared with FU/FA in patients both younger than 70 years and ≥ 70 years (46.6% v 29.0% P < .0001; and 50.5% v 30.3%, P < .0001, respectively). With irinotecan/FU/FA, progression-free survival was better for both younger (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77; 95% CI, 0.70 to 0.85; P < .0001) and elderly patients (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.90; P = .0026). In younger patients, overall survival was improved with combination therapy (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.75 to 0.92; P = .0003). The same trend was observed in elderly patients (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.05; P = .15). There was no significant interaction between treatment arm and age in the regression analysis. The expected differences in toxicity between combination and monotherapy in elderly and younger patients were observed. A significant interaction between treatment and age (cutoff, 70 years) for vomiting and hepatotoxicity was not confirmed by analysis that used age as a continuous variable. Conclusion Patients older than 70 years of age who were selected for inclusion in phase III trials derived similar benefits as younger patients from irinotecan-containing chemotherapy, and the risk of toxicity was similar.

The CRYSTAL and OPUS randomised clinical trials demonstrated that adding cetuximab to first-line chemotherapy in patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) significantly improved treatment outcome compared with chemotherapy alone. The objective of this pooled analysis was to further investigate these findings in patients with KRAS wild-type tumours using extended survival data and following an enhancement in the ascertainment rate of KRAS and BRAF tumour mutation status from these studies.Pooled individual patient data from each study were analysed for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and best overall response rate (ORR) in patients evaluable for KRAS and BRAF mutation status. Treatment arms were compared according to mutation status using log-rank and Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel tests.In 845 patients with KRAS wild-type tumours adding cetuximab to chemotherapy led to a significant improvement in OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.81; p=0.0062), PFS (HR 0.66; p0.001) and ORR (odds ratio 2.16; p0.0001). BRAF mutations were detected in 70/800 evaluable tumours. No significant differences were found in outcome between the treatment groups in these patients. Prognosis was worse in each treatment arm for patients with BRAF tumour mutations compared with those with BRAF wild-type tumours.Analysis of pooled data from the CRYSTAL and OPUS studies confirms the consistency of the benefit obtained across all efficacy end-points from adding cetuximab to first-line chemotherapy in patients with KRAS wild-type mCRC. BRAF mutation does not appear to be a predictive biomarker in this setting, but is a marker of poor prognosis.

Purpose The tet oncogene family member 2 (TET2) gene was recently identified to be mutated in myeloid disorders including acute myeloid leukemia (AML). To date, there is increasing evidence for a functional role of TET2 mutations (TET2mut) in AML. Thus, we explored the frequency, gene-expression pattern, and clinical impact of TET2mut in a large cohort of patients with AML in the context of other AML-associated aberrations. Patients and Methods Samples from 783 younger adult patients with AML were analyzed for the presence of TET2mut (coding exons 3 to 11), and results were correlated with data from molecular genetic analyses, gene-expression profiling, and clinical outcome. Results In total, 66 TET2mut were found in 60 patients (60 of 783 patients; 7.6%), including missense (n = 37), frameshift (n = 16), and nonsense (n = 13) mutations, which, with one exception, were all heterozygous. TET2mut were not correlated with distinct clinical features or genetic alterations, except for isocitrate dehydrogenase mutations (IDHmut) that were almost mutually exclusive with TET2mut (P < .001). TET2mut were characterized by only a weak gene-expression pattern, which, nevertheless, reflected TET2mut-associated biology. TET2mut did not impact the response to induction therapy and clinical outcome; the combination of patients who exhibited TET2mut and/or IDHmut revealed shorter overall survival (P = .03), although this association was not independent from known risk factors. Conclusion TET2mut were identified in 7.6% of younger adult patients with AML and did not impact the response to therapy and survival. Mutations were mutually exclusive with IDHmut, which supported recent data on a common mechanism of action that might obscure the impact of TET2mut if compared against all other patients with AML.

The fully human anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody panitumumab has been shown to improve progression-free survival when administered as a monotherapy for patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and is approved in this setting. Two large randomized clinical trials have investigated panitumumab in combination with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) as a first-line therapy for mCRC and 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) as a second-line therapy for mCRC. In these studies, the combination of panitumumab with FOLFOX or FOLFIRI resulted in improved progression-free survival compared with FOLFOX or FOLFIRI alone. Improved tumor response was also observed with the addition of panitumumab to FOLFIRI. As in monotherapy trials, the clinical benefits associated with panitumumab treatment were confined to patients with wild-type KRAS tumors, further showing the validity of KRAS mutational status as a predictive biomarker in mCRC. In addition to KRAS mutational status, a number of other potential predictive biomarkers are currently being investigated in mCRC and may eventually help identify patients who are likely to benefit from treatment with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies. Toxicities observed during treatment with panitumumab combined with FOLFOX or FOLFIRI were generally manageable and commonly included skin toxicities and gastrointestinal toxicities. Because it can lead to dose delays, dose reductions, and discontinuation, physicians and patients should carefully manage skin toxicity. Overall, the results of these two studies show that panitumumab improves outcomes when added to FOLFOX or FOLFIRI among patients with mCRC with wild-type KRAS.

We aimed to determine the prognostic impact of monosomal karyotype (MK) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in the context of the current World Health Organization (WHO) classification and to evaluate the outcome of MK+ patients after allogeneic HSCT. Of 1058 patients with abnormal cytogenetics, 319 (30%) were MK MK+. MK+ patients were significantly older (P = .0001), had lower white blood counts (P = .0006), and lower percentages of BM blasts (P = .0004); MK was associated with the presence of −5/5q−, −7, 7q−, abnl(12p), abnl(17p), −18/18q−, −20/20q−, inv(3)/t(3;3), complex karyotype (CK), and myelodysplasia (MDS)–related cytogenetic abnormalities (P < .0001, each); and NPM1 mutations (P < .0001), FLT3 internal tandem duplications (P < .0001), and tyrosine kinase domain mutations (P = .02) were less frequent in MK+. Response to induction therapy and overall survival in MK+ patients were dismal with a complete remission rate of 32.5% and a 4-year survival of 9%. MK retained its prognostic impact in AML with CK, AML with MDS-related cytogenetic abnormalities, and in a revised definition (MK-R) excluding cases with recurrent genetic abnormalities according to WHO classification and those with derivative chromosomes not leading to true monosomies. In younger patients, allogeneic HSCT from matched related and unrelated donors resulted in a limited improvement of overall survival.