Search

BackgroundInternational variations in cancer outcomes persist and may be influenced by differences in the accessibility and organisation of cancer patient pathways. More evidence is needed to understand to what extent variations in the structure of primary care referral pathways for cancer investigation contribute to differences in the timeliness of diagnoses and cancer outcomes in different countries.AimTo explore the variation in primary care referral pathways for the management of suspected cancer across different countries.Design and settingDescriptive comparative analysis using mixed methods across the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership (ICBP) countries.MethodSchematics of primary care referral pathways were developed across 10 ICBP jurisdictions. The schematics were initially developed using the Aarhus statement (a resource providing greater insight and precision into early cancer diagnosis research) and were further supplemented with expert insights through consulting leading experts in primary care and cancer, existing ICBP data, a focused review of existing evidence on the management of suspected cancer, published primary care cancer guidelines, and evaluations of referral tools and initiatives in primary care.ResultsReferral pathway schematics for 10 ICBP jurisdictions were presented alongside a descriptive comparison of the organisation of primary care management of suspected cancer. Several key areas of variation across countries were identified: inflexibility of referral pathways, lack of a managed route for non-specific symptoms, primary care practitioner decision-making autonomy, direct access to investigations, and use of emergency routes.ConclusionAnalysing the differences in referral processes can prompt further research to better understand the impact of variation on the timeliness of diagnoses and cancer outcomes. Studying these schematics in local contexts may help to identify opportunities to improve care and facilitate discussions on what may constitute best referral practice.

The pig is increasingly being used in medical research, both as a model of the human cardiovascular system, and as a possible source of organs for xenotransplantation. However, little is known about the comparative functions of the vascular endothelium between porcine and human arteries. We have therefore compared the effects of two endothelium-dependent vasorelaxants, acetylcholine (ACh) and the Ca2+-ATPase inhibitor, cyclopiazonic acid (CPA) on the porcine and human isolated pulmonary artery using isometric tension recording. ACh and CPA produced endothelium-dependent relaxations of both the human and porcine pulmonary arteries. In the porcine pulmonary artery, the cyclo-oxygenase inhibitor, flurbiprofen had no effect on relaxations to ACh (Emax: control 67.8+/-8.8% versus 72.4+/-9.5% (n=11)) or CPA (Emax: control 79.6+/-5.0% versus 94.0+/-10.6% (n=7)). The nitric oxide synthase inhibitor, L-NAME converted relaxations to both ACh and CPA into contractile responses (maximum response: ACh 30.0+/-11.1% (n = 10); CPA 80.4+/-26.2% (n = 8) of U46619-induced tone). These contractile responses in the presence of L-NAME were abolished by flurbiprofen. In the human pulmonary artery, L-NAME and flurbiprofen partly attenuated relaxations to ACh (Emax: control: 45.1+/-12.1%; flurbiprofen: 33.4+/-13.5%; L-NAME: 10.1+/-7.2%) and CPA (Emax: control: 78.1+/-5.5%; flurbiprofen: 69.6+/-7.2%; L-NAME 37.9+/-10.7% of U46619-induced tone). These responses were abolished by the combination of both inhibitors. We have demonstrated that while the release of nitric oxide is important in responses to endothelium-dependent vasorelaxants in both human and porcine pulmonary arteries, in the human arteries, there is an important role for vasorelaxant prostanoids whilst in the porcine arteries, vasoconstrictor prostanoids are released.