Search

Background: Renal transplant recipients with donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies are at an increased risk of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). Early protocolized renal biopsies may serve as a strategy to improve diagnosis in this patient population., Methods: We evaluated 155 highly sensitized renal transplant recipients with cPRA class I + II > 90% pre-transplant from 2015 to 2022. Patients with protocol biopsies within the first two weeks post-transplant were included., Results: A total of 122 patients were included in the study. Of these, 13 (10.6%) were diagnosed with very early antibody-mediated rejection (veABMR) within the first two weeks post-transplant. This corresponds to 52% (13/25 patients) of all ABMR cases reported during the follow-up of this population. The graft survival rates at one and three years were significantly lower in patients with veABMR (p < 0.001) compared to patients without rejection in the early protocol biopsy. In terms of severity, the veABMR cohort exhibited a hazard ratio (HR) of 10.33 (95% CI 3.23-33.06; p < 0.001) for graft failure. The presence of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) class II on the day of transplantation and a higher percentage of eplet mismatch (EpMM), particularly EpMM DQA1, correlated with the development of veABMR., Conclusion: Early protocol biopsies play a pivotal role in the early detection of veABMR in high-risk immunological patients. Patients with veABMR face significant risks of graft loss, despite early treatment of rejection., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the ERA.)

Background: Prognosis of HIV-infected patients on dialysis has improved. Few studies have compared survival between HIV-infected and HIV-negative patients on dialysis in the combined antiretroviral therapy (cART) era. We compared the outcome of HIV-infected patients on dialysis with a matched HIV-negative cohort., Methods: National, multicenter, retrospective cohort study of HIV-infected patients starting dialysis in Spain (1999-2006). Matching criteria for HIV-negative patients were dialysis center, year of starting dialysis, age, sex, and race., Results: The study population comprised 122 patients, 66 HIV-infected, and 66 HIV-negative patients. Median age was 41 years, and all but 4 HIV-infected patients were white. HIV-associated nephropathy was only present in 4 cases. HIV-infected patients were less frequently included on the kidney transplantation waiting list (17% vs 62%, P < 0.001). They also had more hepatitis C virus coinfection (76% vs 11%, P < 0.001), fewer cardiovascular events (62% vs 88%, P = 0.001), fewer kidney transplants (4.5% vs 38%, P < 0.001), and higher mortality (32% vs 1.5%, P < 0.001). Survival rates [95% confidence interval (CI)] at 1, 3, and 5 years for HIV-infected patients were 95.2% (89.9%-100%), 71.7% (59.7%-83.7%), and 62.7% (46.6%-78.8%). Five-year survival for HIV-negative patients was 94.4% (83.8%-100%) (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed the following variables to be associated with death in HIV-infected patients: peritoneal dialysis vs hemodialysis [hazard ratio; (95% CI): 2.88 (1.16-7.17)] and being on effective cART [hazard ratio (95% CI): 0.39 (0.16-0.97)]., Conclusions: Medium-term survival of HIV-infected patients on dialysis was lower than that of matched HIV-negative patients. Fewer HIV-infected patients had access to kidney transplantation. Being on effective cART improves survival. Further studies are needed to determine whether peritoneal dialysis increases mortality.

Objectives: To determine prevalence and characteristics of end-stage renal diseases (ESRD) [dialysis and renal transplantation (RT)] among European HIV-infected patients., Methods: Cross-sectional multicenter survey of EuroSIDA clinics during 2008., Results: Prevalence of ESRD was 0.5%. Of 122 patients with ESRD 96 were on dialysis and 26 had received a RT. Median age was 47 years, 73% were males and 43% were black. Median duration of HIV infection was 11 years. Thirty-three percent had prior AIDS; 91% were receiving antiretrovirals; and 88% had undetectable viral load. Median CD4(+)T-cell count was 341 cells per cubic millimetre; 20.5% had hepatitis C coinfection. Most frequent causes of ESRD were HIV-associated nephropathy (46%) and other glomerulonephritis (28%). Hemodialysis (93%) was the most common dialysis modality; 34% of patients were on the RT waiting list. A poor HIV control was the reason for exclusion from RT waiting list in 22.4% of cases. All the RT recipients were all alive at the time of the survey. Acute rejection was reported in 8 patients (30%). Functioning graft was present in 21 (80%)., Conclusions: This is the first multinational cross-sectional study of ESRD among European HIV population. Low prevalence of ESRD was found. Two-thirds of patients were excluded from RT for non-HIV/AIDS-related pathologies. Most patients had a functioning graft despite a high acute rejection rate.

To analyze the clinical management of the renal transplant recipient from a kidney living donor. The renal transplantation (RT) from a living donor without surgical complications has a very low frequency of acute tubular necrosis (ATN) that facilitates enormously the clinical control. The scheme of follow-up after-RT must include: (1) Hemodynamic monitoring; (2) Clinical management; (3) Renal allograft monitoring: renal function, diuresis, radionuclide imaging and ultrasound-Doppler; (4) Pharmacological treatment: analgesia, gastric protection, antibiotic prevention; (5) Monitoring of the immunosuppressive therapy; (6) Digestive monitoring; (7) Control of the cardiovascular risk; (8) Preventions infectious; (9) Osteodistrophia control. In living donor RT a rapid normalization of the renal function and a time of hospitalization reduced are observed. The presence of a long ATN or a renal dysfunction of the graft must force to realize an early renal allograft biopsy.