Search

Background: Disruption of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) may lead to recurrent lateral patellar dislocation and patellofemoral chondral injury. Despite significant previous work investigating numerous performance parameters, the optimal graft choice for MPFL reconstruction for patellar instability remains unclear. Purpose: To compare functional outcomes scores, subjective recurrent instability, and revision rates between autograft and allograft in MPFL reconstruction. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients who underwent MPFL reconstruction with autograft between 2013 and 2018 were identified. A 2:1 comparison group of patients who underwent MPFL reconstruction with allograft was matched by sex, age (±3 years), and body mass index (BMI) (±3 kg/m2). Patient characteristics, preoperative radiograph measurements, and intraoperative data were compared between the groups, as were patient-reported outcome measures, including International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE), and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. Subjective recurrent instability and revision rate were also compared between groups. Results: The autograft group was composed of 30 patients (13 male, 17 female) with a mean age of 24.4 years and mean BMI of 25.0 kg/m2, and the allograft group was composed of 60 matched patients (25 male, 35 female) with a mean age of 24.1 years and mean BMI of 25.1 kg/m2. The autograft and allograft groups reported similar IKDC scores (73.0 vs 73.7; P =.678), Lysholm scores (77.5 vs 80.7; P =.514), SANE (72.0 vs 75.8; P =.236), and VAS pain (30.7 vs 26.6; P =.482), as well as similar rates of postoperative patellar subluxations (20.0% vs 19.3%; P =.867) and dislocations (10.0% vs 15.0%; P =.805). Conclusion: Both allograft and autograft were found to be viable options for MPFL reconstruction. There were no significant group differences in failure rates, patient-reported outcomes, pain, or complications between autograft and allograft MPFL reconstruction in this series. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Injuries to the medial ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) are common among baseball pitchers due to repetitive stress on the soft tissue stabilizers of the elbow during pitching. Dynamic stress ultrasound (SUS) can be used to evaluate the UCL and ulnohumeral joint to identify anatomic risk factors of those who will require UCL reconstruction (UCLR). Purpose: To determine whether any adaptive or morphological changes detectable on SUS can predict injury to the UCL in professional baseball pitchers. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 203 professional baseball pitchers who underwent SUS at preseason training sessions over the course of 18 years were categorized into 1 of 2 groups: those without a history of shoulder, arm, elbow, or forearm surgery or injuries (healthy cohort; n = 184) and those who underwent UCLR the same season as SUS (UCLR cohort; n = 19). Ligament thickness, joint spacing, and laxity were compared. An additional matched cohort analysis was conducted using 10 players from each group to detect differences in the progression of UCL and ulnohumeral joint measures in the year before injury. Results: The UCLR cohort, when compared with the healthy cohort, had higher relative (ie, nondominant-side measurements subtracted from dominant-side measurements) resting ulnohumeral joint space (median, 0.50 vs 0.20 mm, respectively; P =.006) and higher rates of hypoechoic foci (57.9% vs 30.4%, respectively; P =.030). Players of both groups had similar dominant UCL thickness (P =.161), ulnohumeral joint space at rest (P =.321), space under stress (P =.498), and laxity (P =.796). Groups did not differ in terms of relative UCL thickness, ulnohumeral joint space under stress, or relative laxity. In the year before UCL injury, the UCLR cohort, compared with the matched healthy cohort, had a greater increase in mean dominant UCL thickness (0.94 vs –0.60 mm, respectively; P =.038) and a greater increase in relative median UCL thickness (1.35 vs –0.35 mm, respectively; P =.045). Players in the healthy cohort were statistically older than those in the UCLR cohort (23 vs 22 years, respectively; P =.004). No differences in ulnohumeral stress spacing or laxity were detected. Conclusion: SUS of players who underwent UCLR demonstrated a progressive increase in UCL thickness over 1 year, higher rates of hypoechoic foci, and increased ulnohumeral rest space compared with SUS of uninjured players. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: There is a paucity of data analyzing dynamic stress ultrasound (SUS) findings in elite pitchers who have undergone ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction (UCLR) and returned to sport. Purpose: To identify longitudinal, perioperative changes in the elbows of professional baseball pitchers who have undergone UCLR and to compare these findings with a matched cohort of healthy pitchers. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: This study used prospectively collected data from dynamic elbow SUS analyses of professional baseball pitchers within a single Major League Baseball organization. Pitchers were divided into 2 cohorts: a UCLR cohort and healthy cohort. The UCLR cohort eligibility included availability of (1) SUS from preseason of injury/UCLR and (2) SUS from ≥2 years after surgery. These players were 1:1 matched to players with no history of upper extremity injury to form the healthy cohort. Ligament thickness and ulnohumeral joint space at rest and under stress were directly measured. Joint laxity was calculated by subtracting joint space at rest from joint space under stress. The term "relative" was used to describe calculated differences where nondominant measurements were subtracted from dominant-side measurements. Results: Eight pitchers were included in the UCLR group and matched to 8 healthy pitchers (mean age at initial SUS examination, 19.6 years). At a minimum follow-up of 2 years, there were no significant differences between groups in terms of relative or dominant arm rest space, stress space, or laxity. Longitudinally (final measurements – baseline measurements), the mean relative ulnohumeral rest space decreased in the UCLR group and increased in the healthy group (–0.36 mm vs +0.50 mm; P =.032). The finding of increased UCL thickness in the UCLR group was expected, as UCL grafts are typically thicker than native ligaments. Conclusion: Ulnhohumeral joint stability was achieved after UCLR as indicated by similar rest space, stress space, and joint laxity in dominant arms compared with a matched healthy cohort. A significant decrease in relative rest space after UCLR may represent the achievement of stability in surgery patients. Alternatively, the increase in ulnohumeral rest space seen in the healthy cohort may represent adaptive changes from pitching at a professional level. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]