1. A national survey comparing practice patterns and residency training satisfaction for categorical dermatology versus combined internal medicine and dermatology trained physicians
- Author
-
Han, Joohee, Ronkainen, Sanna D, Jacobsen, Audrey, Bohjanen, Kimberly A, Merola, Joseph F, Colavincenzo, Maria L, DeWitt, Christine A, Fett, Nicole M, Haemel, Anna, Rosenbach, Misha, Werth, Victoria P, Lunos, Scott, and Goldfarb, Noah
- Subjects
dermatology ,internal medicine ,residency ,med-derm ,practice patterns ,training - Abstract
Combined internal medicine and dermatology (med-derm) training programs were created to advance complex medical dermatology and inpatient dermatology care. A prior study demonstrated that compared to categorical dermatology residents, med-derm residents had less program satisfaction, yet indicated a stronger desire to pursue careers in academia. No follow-up data on practice patterns after training has been reported. We aimed to characterize differences in residency program satisfaction and practice patterns between physicians trained in categorical dermatology compared to med-derm residency programs. We surveyed physicians who graduated from combined med-derm programs along with their counterparts, from six institutions, that either currently or historically had a combined med-derm training, from 2008-2017. Fifty-five percent of med-derm and forty-one percent of categorical-trained physicians responded. The practice patterns between the two groups were similar. A quarter of med-derm physicians continued to provide general internal medicine services. Categorical trained physicians were significantly more satisfied with their training (P=0.03) and performed more excisions on the head/neck (P=0.02). The combined graduates had significantly greater confidence in multidisciplinary care (P=0.003), prescribed more biologic (P
- Published
- 2023