Search

Purpose: To assess the long‐term stability of the anchored radiofrequency transponders and compare displacement rates with other commercially available lung fiducial markers. We also sought to describe late toxicity attributable to fiducial implantation or migration. Materials and methods: The transponder cohort was comprised of 17 patients at our institution who enrolled in a multisite prospective clinical trial and underwent bronchoscopic implantation of three anchored transponders into small (2–2.5 mm) airways. We generated a comparison cohort of 34 patients by selecting patients from our institutional lung SBRT database and matching 2:1 based on the lobe containing tumor and proximity to the bronchial tree. Assessment of migration was performed by rigidly registering the most recent follow‐up CT scan to the simulation scan, and assessing whether the relative geometry of the fiducial markers had changed by more than 5 mm. Toxicity outcomes of interest were hemoptysis and pneumothorax. Results: The median follow‐up of patients in the transponder cohort was 25.3 months and the median follow‐up in the comparison cohort was 21.7 months. When assessing the most recent CT, all fiducial markers were within 5 mm of their position at CT simulation in 11 (65%) patients in the transponder group as compared to 23 (68%) in the comparison group (P = 0.28). One case of hemoptysis was identified in the transponder cohort, and bronchoscopy confirmed bleeding from recurrent tumor; no cases of hemoptysis were noted in the comparison cohort. No case of pneumothorax was noted in either group. Conclusion: No significant difference in the rates of fiducial marker retention and migration were noted when comparing patients who had anchored transponders placed into small airways and a 2:1 matched cohort of patients who had other commercially available lung fiducial markers placed. In both groups, no late or chronic toxicity appeared to be related to the implanted fiducial markers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Surgery is often used for large or symptomatic brain metastases but is associated with risk of developing leptomeningeal dissemination. Emerging data suggest that fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (FSRT) is an effective management strategy in large brain metastases. We sought to retrospectively compare leptomeningeal disease (LMD) and local control (LC) rates for patients treated with surgical resection followed by radiosurgery (S + SRS) versus FSRT alone., Methods and Materials: We identified all patients with a brain metastasis ≥3 cm in diameter treated from 2004 to 2017 with S + SRS or FSRT alone (25 or 30 Gy in 5 fractions) who had follow-up imaging. LMD was defined as focal or diffuse leptomeningeal enhancement that was >5 mm from the index metastasis. Categorical baseline characteristics were compared with the χ 2 test. LMD and LC rates were evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method, with the log-rank test used to compare subgroups., Results: A total of 125 patients were identified, including 82 and 43 in the S + SRS and FSRT alone groups, respectively. Median pretreatment Graded Prognostic Assessment in the S + SRS and FSRT groups was 2.5 and 1.5, respectively ( P  < .001). Median follow-up was 7 months. The KM estimate of 12-month LMD rate in the S + SRS and FSRT groups was 45% and 19%, respectively ( P  = .048). The KM estimate of 12-month local control in the S + SRS and FSRT groups was 70% and 69%, respectively ( P  = .753). The 12-month KM estimate of grade ≥3 toxicity was 1.4% in S + SRS group versus 6.3% in the FSRT alone group ( P  = .248). After adjusting for graded prognostic assessment (GPA), no overall survival difference was observed between groups ( P  = .257)., Conclusions: Surgery is appropriate for certain brain metastases, but S + SRS may increase LMD risk compared with FSRT alone. Because S + SRS and FSRT seem to have similar LC, FSRT may be a viable alternative to S + SRS in select patients with large brain metastases., (© 2019 The Author(s).)