Search

PurposeTERT gene rearrangement with transcriptional superenhancers leads to TERT overexpression and neuroblastoma. No targeted therapy is available for clinical trials in patients with TERT-rearranged neuroblastoma.Experimental designAnticancer agents exerting the best synergistic anticancer effects with BET bromodomain inhibitors were identified by screening an FDA-approved oncology drug library. The synergistic effects of the BET bromodomain inhibitor OTX015 and the proteasome inhibitor carfilzomib were examined by immunoblot and flow cytometry analysis. The anticancer efficacy of OTX015 and carfilzomib combination therapy was investigated in mice xenografted with TERT-rearranged neuroblastoma cell lines or patient-derived xenograft (PDX) tumor cells, and the role of TERT reduction in the anticancer efficacy was examined through rescue experiments in mice.ResultsThe BET bromodomain protein BRD4 promoted TERT-rearranged neuroblastoma cell proliferation through upregulating TERT expression. Screening of an approved oncology drug library identified the proteasome inhibitor carfilzomib as the agent exerting the best synergistic anticancer effects with BET bromodomain inhibitors including OTX015. OTX015 and carfilzomib synergistically reduced TERT protein expression, induced endoplasmic reticulum stress, and induced TERT-rearranged neuroblastoma cell apoptosis which was blocked by TERT overexpression and endoplasmic reticulum stress antagonists. In mice xenografted with TERT-rearranged neuroblastoma cell lines or PDX tumor cells, OTX015 and carfilzomib synergistically blocked TERT expression, induced tumor cell apoptosis, suppressed tumor progression, and improved mouse survival, which was largely reversed by forced TERT overexpression.ConclusionsOTX015 and carfilzomib combination therapy is likely to be translated into the first clinical trial of a targeted therapy in patients with TERT-rearranged neuroblastoma.

For localized, resectable neuroblastoma without MYCN amplification, surgery only is recommended even if incomplete. However, it is not known whether the genomic background of these tumors may influence outcome.

BACKGROUND: Biology based treatment reduction, i.e. surgery alone also in case of not totally resected tumors, was advised in neuroblastoma patients with localized resectable disease without MYCN amplification. However, whether the genomic background of these tumors may influence outcome was unknown and therefore scrutinized in a meta-analysis comprising two prospective therapy studies and a ‘validation’ cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Diagnostic samples were derived from 406 INSS stages 1/2A/2B tumors from three cohorts: LNESGI/II and COG. Genomic data were analyzed in two age groups (cut-off: 18 months) and quality controlled by the SIOPEN Biology Group. RESULTS: In both patient age groups stage 2 tumors led to similarly reduced event-free survival (5y-EFS: 83+3% versus 80+4%), but overall survival was only decreased in patients >18m (5y-OS: 97+1% versus 87+4%; p=0.001). In the latter age subgroup, only tumors with SCA led to relapses, with 11q loss as the strongest marker (5y-EFS: 40+15% versus 89+5%; p18m but not

BACKGROUND:\ud \ud Real-time PCR is increasingly being adopted for RNA quantification and genetic analysis. At present the most popular real-time PCR assay is based on the hybridisation of a dual-labelled probe to the PCR product, and the development of a signal by loss of fluorescence quenching as PCR degrades the probe. Though this so-called 'TaqMan' approach has proved easy to optimise in practice, the dual-labelled probes are relatively expensive.\ud \ud RESULTS:\ud \ud We have designed a new assay based on SYBR-Green I binding that is quick, reliable, easily optimised and compares well with the published assay. Here we demonstrate its general applicability by measuring copy number in three different genetic contexts; the quantification of a gene rearrangement (T-cell receptor excision circles (TREC) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells); the detection and quantification of GLI, MYC-C and MYC-N gene amplification in cell lines and cancer biopsies; and detection of deletions in the OPA1 gene in dominant optic atrophy.\ud \ud CONCLUSION:\ud \ud Our assay has important clinical applications, providing accurate diagnostic results in less time, from less biopsy material and at less cost than assays currently employed such as FISH or Southern blotting.\ud

The prognosis of pediatric neuroblastoma depends both on clinical presentation and on certain cellular and molecular characteristics. At the present time, two hypotheses can be drawn to explain both clinical and biological heterogeneity. In the first hypothesis, neuroblastoma progresses from early to late clinical stages through a classical multistep process linked to an accumulation of molecular abnormalities. In the second hypothesis, neuroblastoma represents an heterogeneous group of unrelated diseases, where most of stages I and II or stage IVS neuroblastomas can rather be considered as benign tumors, and stage IV neuroblastoma as a true malignant proliferation. To ascertain relevant biological factors for the prognosis of the disease, it is uppermost important that all investigators agree on biological criteria for analysis when neuroblastoma tissue is available in screened and unscreened populations. This paper reviews the biological tools available for prognosis in neuroblastoma, the priority for analysis of biological markers according to reliability, feasibility, and reproducibility of analysis procedure, and the conditions of tissue storage for further analysis of these biological markers. The standardized biological evaluation of neuroblastoma will allow, first, to collect sufficient data for multivariate analysis of prognostic factors and, second, to better define the putative links between various forms of the disease.

The prognosis of pediatric neuroblastoma depends both on clinical presentation and on certain cellular and molecular characteristics. Screening programs have been initiated in infants of less than one year of age, based on the hypothesis that neuroblastoma progresses from early to late clinical stages through a classical multistep process linked to an accumulation of molecular abnormalities. However, recent analyses suggest that most cases discovered by screening are low stage tumors considered as dysembryogenetic residues devoid from major abnormalities and that high-grade tumors with molecular abnormalities are unrelated diseases.To confirm one or the other hypothesis, and eventually identify biological factors possibly responsible for the initiation and progression of the disease, it is of utmost importance that all investigators agree on biological criteria for analysis when neuroblastoma tissue is available in screened and unscreened populations. This paper reviews the biological tools available for prognosis in neuroblastoma, the priority for analysis of biological markers according to both methodological reliability and feasibility, and the conditions of tissue storage for further analysis of these biological markers.The standardized biological evaluation of neuroblastoma will allow to collect sufficient data for multivariate analysis; such analysis is now fundamental if one wants to clearly define the respective impacts of biological abnormalities on neuroblastoma progression.